DOCSLIB.ORG

Situation Overview: Jonglei State, South Sudan January-March 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Situation Overview: Jonglei State, South Sudan January-March 2018 Situation Overview: Jonglei State, South Sudan January-March 2018 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage Map 3: REACH assessment coverage Bor Town, c) two FGDs for Ayod in Bor PoC. of Jonglei State, January 2018 of Jonglei State, March 2018 All this information is included in the data used Ongoing conflict in Jonglei continued for this Situation Overview. to negatively affect humanitarian needs among the population in the first quarter of This Situation Overview provides an update 2018. Clashes between armed groups and to key findings from the November 2017 1 pervasive insecurity, particularly in northern Situation Overview. The first section analyses Jonglei caused displacement among affected displacement and population movement in communities, negatively impacting the ability Jonglei during the first quarter of 2018, and the to meet their primary needs. second section evaluates access to food and basic services for both IDP and non-displaced REACH has been assessing the situation in Map 2: REACH assessment coverage communities. hard-to-reach areas in South Sudan since of Jonglei State, February 2018 December 2015, to inform the response Population Movement and of humanitarian actors working outside of Displacement formal settlement sites. This settlement data Levels of depopulation remained high but is collected across South Sudan on a monthly stable overall in most parts of Jonglei in the first basis. Between 2 January and 23 March, Assessed settlements quarter of 2018. The proportion of assessed REACH interviewed 1527 Key Informants Settement settlements in Jonglei reporting that half or (KIs) with knowledge of humanitarian needs Cover percentae o aeed ettement reative to the OCHA COD tota dataet more of the population had left remained in 710 settlements in 7 of the 11 counties in similar between December 2017 (45%) and Jonglei State. January 2018 (37%), with no considerable In the first quarter of 2018, displacement Bor South County in Yolakot, Awerial County, In order to ensure an understanding of change in February or March. current displacement trends and humanitarian data from KI interviews were triangulated Lakes State and d) one FGD with new arrivals However, an intensification of conflict conditions in settlements from which with seventeen Focus Group Discussions from Juba in Bor Town. (FGDs), which involved participatory mapping between armed groups drove an increase displacement took place, new arrivals in data Informing further analysis on food security exercises to understand the routes that in displacement within Greater Akobo in the collection sites, representing 43% of KIs, were trends across the state, REACH also internally displaced persons (IDPs) took. first quarter of 2018. Indicative of this, 60% specifically targeted. The remainder of the KIs conducted ten Food Security and Livelihood These included: a) seven FGDs with new of assessed settlements in Greater Akobo interviewed (57%) reported having been in (FSL) FGDs with new arrivals and people arrivals from Greater Akobo (Uror, Nyirol and reported that more than half the population the settlement or having had regular contact who had recent contact with those in relevant Akobo Counties) in Akobo Town, b) five FGDs had left in January, compared to an average with someone from the settlement within the settlements including: a) four FGDs for Greater with new arrivals and people who had recent of 37% across all assessed settlements last month. For more information, please Akobo in Akobo Town, b) two FGDs for Duk contact with those in Greater Akobo and Ayod in Jonglei. Moreover, in January 55% of see the methodology section in this Situation County and two FGDs for Twic East County in in Bor PoC, c) four FGD with new arrivals from assessed settlements with IDPs in Akobo Overview. : 1 REACH South Sudan, Situation Overview, November 2017 . METHODOLOGY Map 4: Displacement Overview Jonglei State humanitarian partners in Akobo Town on the To provide an overview of the situation in 7 February registering 9,045 newly arrived UNITY 2 largely inaccessible areas of Jonglei State, UPPER Displacement to Jonglei individuals . Reflective of this displacement, Phom NILE REACH uses primary data provided by key Displacement within Jonglei the proportion of assessed settlements Canal informants who have recently arrived, or Fangak County reporting presence of IDPs in Greater Akobo County Pagil Displacement out of South received regular information, from their pre- Nyirol increased from 60% in December to 72% in County Lankien Sudan displacement location or “Area of Knowledge”. Waat January, remaining stable in February before Ayod Wanding County decreasing to 59% in March. This is consistent Information for this report was collected Ayod Yuai ETHIOPIA from key informants in the Mingkaman with reports from new arrivals interviewed Duk Duk Padiet Akobo Akobo during FGDs in Akobo in January who reported Spontaneous Settlement, Bor and Juba PoC County Uror County County Pochalla fleeing conflict in areas around Pieri, Motot, Twic East sites, Bor Town, Akobo Town, as well as in County County Nyal, throughout the first quarter of 2018. Yuai, Waat and Walgak, reaching Akobo in mid LAKES Bor South January. While the outbreak of conflict among The first phase of the assessment methodology County armed groups was consistently cited as a Pibor comprised a participatory mapping exercise to Pibor primary factor behind their displacement, FGD Bor County JONGLEI map the relevant settlements in Jonglei State. participants also reported inadequate access In-depth interviews were then conducted with to food due to lack of rainfall for cultivation, in selected participants, using a standardised WESTERN addition to suspension of food distributions due EQUATORIA survey tool comprising questions on EASTERN to insecurity as reasons for their displacement. displacement trends, population needs and EQUATORIA Juba As those displaced from conflict affected access to basic services. areas in Uror moved to Akobo, traveling north of Waat before turning south-east to Walgak After data collection was completed, all groups, particularly in areas along the Yuai- within Jonglei in the first quarter of 2018. In and onward to Akobo, some populations in the data was examined at the settlement level, Waat corridor, and other locations in Greater addition to high levels of displacement in and settlements were assigned the modal areas through which they passed also decided Akobo in January, continuing into early Greater Akobo, in March 40% of assessed response. When no consensus could be to leave, fearing the spread of conflict to their February2. Indicative of moderately improved settlements with IDPs in Fangak reported found for a settlement, it was not included in settlements3. In addition to those displaced security conditions, despite sporadic clashes, IDPs arriving in the first two months of 2018, reporting. Descriptive statistics and geospatial from Greater Akobo who proceeded through displacement into Akobo town decreased in predominantly from locations within Fangak, analysis were then used to analyse the Akobo West to Akobo Town, a smaller number March, with only 13% of assessed settlements but also from locations in Panyikang and Guit data. It should be noted that due to access/ proceeded to Ulang County, Upper Nile State, in Akobo County in March reporting IDPs to Counties, indicative of persistent humanitarian operational constraints which may impact on and to Lankien in Nyirol County. For more have arrived that month, with 33% and 30% of needs in these areas. coverage in each month, some changes over information, please see the Greater Akobo assessed settlements reporting IDPs to have time reported in the situation overview might Displacement from Greater Akobo to Displacement Brief3. arrived in January and February respectively. be due to variations in coverage. Akobo Town Displacement from Greater Akobo to Bor Displacement within Jonglei Following clashes between armed groups in PoC Greater Akobo between 9 and 26 January, County reported that these IDPs arrived While overall levels of displacement remained a large influx of IDPs arrived in Akobo While displacement to Bor PoC site remained during January, predominantly from locations stable across assessed settlements in Jonglei, Town in January and early February, with low in comparison to areas in Northern in Nyirol, and Uror counties. This is reflective conflict and deteriorating humanitarian a joint verification exercise conducted by Jonglei, the number of new arrivals in Bor PoC of an outbreak of fighting between armed conditions continued to drive displacement 2 OCHA South Sudan, Humanitarian Bulletin Issue 02, 20 February 2018 2 3 REACH Greater Akobo Displacement Brief, February 2018 site doubled from 61 individuals in December, Displacement to and within Ayod County Figure 2: Most reported reasons for leaving Akobo Bor Town. FGD Participants cited insecurity to 122 in January, with over two-thirds (72%) for locations in Ethiopia in March 2018: FGD participants interviewed in Bor PoC 33+30+18+9+8+2 and the effect of hyperinflation on participants coming from conflict affected Uror or Nyirol4. site in March reported that some displaced Insecurity 33 % capacity to access food as key push factors This number increased to 133 in February, populations from Uror and Nyirol traveled to Lack of food 30 % for leaving Juba. Participants traveled by boat, with a similar proportion coming from Uror locations in Pagil payam, reflective of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Education in Emergencies, Food Security and Livelihoods And
    D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 5 Needs Assessment Report Education in Emergencies, Food Security, Livelihoods & Protection Fangak County, Jonglei State, South Sudan Finn Church Aid By Finn Church Aid South Sudan Country Program P.O. Box 432, Juba Nabari Area, Bilpham Road, Juba, South Sudan www.finnchurchaid.fi In conjunction with Ideal Capacity Development Consulting Limited P.O Box 54497-00200, Kenbanco House, Moi Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya [email protected], [email protected] www.idealcapacitydevelopment.org 30th November to 10th December 2015 i Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 FOOD SECURITY AND LIVELIHOOD, EDUCATION AND PROTECTION CONTEXT IN SOUTH SUDAN ............................... 1 1.2 ABOUT FIN CHURCH AID (FCA) ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT IN FANGAK COUNTY .................................................................................................. 2 1.4 PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Village Assessment Survey
    IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY SOUTH SUD AN IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX SOUTH SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY DATA COLLECTION: August-November 2019 COUNTIES: Bor South, Rubkona, Wau THEMATIC AREAS: Shelter and Land Ownership, Access and Communications, Livelihoods, Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies, Health, WASH, Education, Protection 1 IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY SOUTH SUD AN CONTENTS RUBKONA COUNTY OVERVIEW 15 DISPLACEMENT DYNAMICS 15 RETURN PATTERNS 15 PAYAM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 16 KEY FINDINGS 17 Shelter and Land Ownership 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Access and Communications 17 LIST OF ACRONYMS 3 Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Livelihoods 18 BACKROUND 6 Health 19 WASH 19 METHODOLOGY 6 Education 20 LIMITATIONS 7 Protection 20 WAU COUNTY OVERVIEW 8 BOR SOUTH COUNTY OVERVIEW 21 DISPLACEMENT DYNAMICS 8 RETURN PATTERNS 8 DISPLACEMENT DYNAMICS 21 PAYAM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 9 RETURN PATTERNS 21 KEY FINDINGS 10 PAYAM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 22 KEY FINDINGS 23 Shelter and Land Ownership 10 Access and Communications 10 Shelter and Land Ownership 23 Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies 10 Access and Communications 23 Livelihoods 11 Markets, Food Security and Coping Strategies 23 Health 12 Livelihoods 24 WASH 13 Health 25 Protection 13 Education 26 Education 14 WASH 27 Protection 27 2 3 IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX VILLAGE ASSESSMENT SURVEY SOUTH SUD AN LIST OF ACRONYMS AIDS: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Rapid Needs Assessment on Flood Disaster in Twic East County, Jonglei State
    Coordinated Flood Disaster Assessment in the Former Twic East County Initial Rapid Needs Assessment On flood Disaster in Twic East County, Jonglei State July, 2019 Page 1 of 12 Coordinated Flood Disaster Assessment in the Former Twic East County Situation Overview Former Twic East County of Jonglei state composed of five Map Payams: Ajuong, Kongor, Lith, Nyuak, and Pakeer. According to the Fifth Population and Housing Census conducted in April 2008, Twic East County had a combined population of 8,5349 people, composed of 4,4039 males and 4,1310 female residents with 14326 Household (HHs) In the month of June 2019, there was a flooding in the former Twic East County which has affected all the five Payams. Nyuak, Kongor and Lith Payams were highly affected while Pakeer and Ajuong Payam were partly flooded. The flooding was caused by erratic and heavy rainfall which happened in the month of June 2019. For the last three years, there has been Twic East County heavy rainfall that causes flooding. The natural land scape of Twic East does not allow free water movement to downstream Affected population: 1547 HHS, total of 8722 people has and the water accumulation has increased in villages, especially been affected. Refer Annex 1 for in agricultural and grazing/pasture land. details. As rainy season is currently on its peak, flooding is expected to Displaced population: increase which might aggravate the situation before impact of Over 1000 HHS have been displaced.) the current flood is tackled and water level goes down. In addition, the rain condition in upper basin of Nile (from Central Key Priorities equatorial and Uganda) is expected to increase the river water Urgent seed vegetable seeds level and water level in swampy area (Sudd part of Twic East), supply for fresh food which will in turn causes breakage of primary dyke (which has production already some weak points) and add more crises in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Tables from the 5Th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008
    Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 CENSU OR S,S F TA RE T T IS N T E IC C S N A N A 123 D D β U E S V A N L R ∑σ µ U E A H T T I O U N O S S S C C S E Southern Sudan Counts: Tables from the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census, 2008 November 19, 2010 ii Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................. iv Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... x Foreword ....................................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ xv Background and Mandate of the Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation (SSCCSE) ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 History of Census-taking in Southern Sudan....................................................................... 2 Questionnaire Content, Sampling and Methodology ............................................................ 2 Implementation .............................................................................................................. 2
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Jonglei – “We Have Always Been at War”
    South Sudan: Jonglei – “We Have Always Been at War” Africa Report N°221 | 22 December 2014 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Jonglei’s Conflicts Before the Civil War ........................................................................... 3 A. Perpetual Armed Rebellion ....................................................................................... 3 B. The Politics of Inter-Communal Conflict .................................................................. 4 1. The communal is political .................................................................................... 4 2. Mixed messages: Government response to intercommunal violence ................. 7 3. Ethnically-targeted civilian disarmament ........................................................... 8 C. Region over Ethnicity? Shifting Alliances between the Bahr el Ghazal Dinka, Greater Bor Dinka and Nuer ...................................................................................... 9 III. South Sudan’s Civil War in Jonglei .................................................................................. 12 A. Armed Factions in Jonglei ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN Consolidated Appeal 2014 - 2016
    SOUTH SUDAN Consolidated Appeal 2014 - 2016 UNOCHA Clusters Assess and analyze needs Clusters and HCT Humanitarian Country Monitor, review Team and Coordinator and report Set strategy and priorities HUMANITARIAN PLANNING PROCESS Organizations Clusters Mobilize resources Develop objectives, indicators, and implement response plans and projects OCHA Compile strategy and plans into Strategic Response Plans and CAP 2014-2016 CONSOLIDATED APPEAL FOR SOUTH SUDAN AAR Japan, ACEM, ACF USA, ACT/DCA, ACT/FCA, ACTED, ADESO, ADRA, AHA, AHANI, AMURT International, ARARD, ARC, ARD, ASMP, AVSI, AWODA, BARA, C&D, CAD, CADA, CARE International, Caritas CCR, Caritas DPO-CDTY, CCM, CCOC, CDoT, CESVI, Chr. Aid, CINA, CMA, CMD, CMMB, CORDAID, COSV, CRADA, CRS, CUAMM, CW, DDG, DORD, DRC, DWHH, FAO, FAR, FLDA, GHA, GKADO, GOAL, HCO, HELP e.V., HeRY, HI, HLSS, Hoffnungszeichen, IAS, IMC UK, Intermon Oxfam, INTERSOS, IOM, IRC, IRW, JUH, KHI, LCED, LDA, MaCDA, MAG, MAGNA, Mani Tese, MAYA, MEDAIR, Mercy Corps, MERLIN, MI, Mulrany International, NCDA, NGO Forum, Nile Hope, NPA, NPC, NPP, NRC, OCHA, OSIL, OXFAM GB, PAH, PCO, PCPM, PIN, Plan, PWJ, RedR UK, RI, RUWASSA, SALF, Samaritan's Purse, SC, SCA, SIMAS, SMC, Solidarités, SPEDP, SSUDA, SUFEM, TEARFUND, THESO, TOCH, UDA, UNDSS, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIDO, UNKEA, UNMAS, UNOPS, UNWWA, VSF (Belgium), VSF (Switzerland), WFP, WHO, World Relief, WTI, WV South Sudan, ZOA Refugee Care Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://unocha.org/cap. Full project details, continually updated, can be viewed, downloaded and printed from http://fts.unocha.org. Photo caption: Fishermen on the Nile River in South Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Early Recovery and Humanitarian
    SOUTH SUDAN EARLY RECOVERY AND HUMANITARIAN PROJECT (SSERHP) END EVALUATION REPORT January , 2014 DENNIS OCHIENG & BETTY KWEYU ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Many people among them CARE staff and constituents have contributed to making this evaluation process a successful, smooth-running and rewarding process. Thanks go first of all to the Project Manager Sylvia Kaawe for her unswerving commitment to the evaluation process and tireless effort in ensuring a smooth workflow despite the unrest attributable to the growing tension and anxiety on the ground at the time Secondly, the evaluation team would like to appreciate the input of each and every CARE program staff in Panyagor sub office including but not limited to participation in interviews, coordination and logistics of this evaluation; in most instances beyond working hours and days. We appreciate the effort made by the County commissioner, Payam Administrators and Community members in attending meetings and interview sessions, with very short notices. Last but not least we acknowledge the input and dedication of all other CARE Staff based in Juba who facilitated the evaluation process; without their support the evaluation would not have been successful. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ IV DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS/CONCEPTS ...................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security Responses in Jonglei State in the Aftermath of Inter-Ethnic Violence
    Security responses in Jonglei State in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence By Richard B. Rands and Dr. Matthew LeRiche Saferworld February 2012 1 Contents List of acronyms 1. Introduction and key findings 2. The current situation: inter-ethnic conflict in Jonglei 3. Security responses 4. Providing an effective response: the challenges facing the security forces in South Sudan 5. Support from UNMISS and other significant international actors 6. Conclusion List of Acronyms CID Criminal Intelligence Division CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement CRPB Conflict Reduction and Peace Building GHQ General Headquarters GoRSS Government of the Republic of South Sudan ICG International Crisis Group MSF Medecins Sans Frontières MI Military Intelligence NISS National Intelligence and Security Service NSS National Security Service SPLA Sudan People’s Liberation Army SPLM Sudan People’s Liberation Movement SRSG Special Representative of the Secretary General SSP South Sudanese Pounds SSPS South Sudan Police Service SSR Security Sector Reform UNMISS United Nations Mission in South Sudan UYMPDA Upper Nile Youth Mobilization for Peace and Development Agency Acknowledgements This paper was written by Richard B. Rands and Dr Matthew LeRiche. The authors would like to thank Jessica Hayes for her invaluable contribution as research assistant to this paper. The paper was reviewed and edited by Sara Skinner and Hesta Groenewald (Saferworld). Opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of Saferworld. Saferworld is grateful for the funding provided to its South Sudan programme by the UK Department for International Development (DfID) through its South Sudan Peace Fund and the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) through its Global Peace and Security Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonglei State, South Sudan Introduction Key Findings
    Situation Overview: Jonglei State, South Sudan January to March 2019 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage METHODOLOGY of Jonglei State, January 2019 To provide an overview of the situation in hard-to- Insecurity related to cattle raiding and inter- Map 3: REACH assessment coverage of Jonglei State, March 2019 reach areas of Jonglei State, REACH uses primary communal violence reported across various data from key informants who have recently arrived parts of Jonglei continued to impact the from, recently visited, or receive regular information ability to cultivate food and access basic Fangak Canal/Pigi from a settlement or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). services, sustaining large-scale humanitarian Nyirol Information for this report was collected from key needs in Jonglei State, South Sudan. Ayod informants in Bor Protection of Civilians site, Bor By March 2019, approximately 5 months Town and Akobo Town in Jonglei State in January, since the harvest season, settlements February and March 2019. Akobo Duk Uror struggled to extend food rations to the In-depth interviews on humanitarian needs were Twic Pochalla same extent as reported in previous years. Map 2: REACH assessment coverage East conducted throughout the month using a structured of Jonglei State, February 2019 survey tool. After data collection was completed, To inform humanitarian actors working Bor South all data was aggregated at settlement level, and outside formal settlement sites, REACH has Pibor settlements were assigned the modal or most conducted assessments of hard-to-reach credible response. When no consensus could be areas in South Sudan since December found for a settlement, that settlement was not Assessed settlements 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected], Area Mapped Logcluster Office, UNOCHA Compound and Jebel Kajur, Juba South Sudan
    Sani Mingyeir Sullu Oubbe Wada`ah Djiri Bajouggi Karaw Balla Nyama Ludung Margibba Arga Gertobak Dalia Zulumingtong Gostoweir El Rahad Gyaga Manawashi En Nahud Duraysah Kurbi Karbab Godoba Silo Arid Limo Menawashei Tebeldina Kurto Kulme Gabir Futajiggi Shurab Zulata Tanako Burbur Seingo Kalamboa Uraydimah Kass Attib Deleig Kalu Dilu Shearia Shaqq Bunzuga al Gawa Galgani Duma Garoula Tangya Korgusa Garsila Kagko Khamis Abu zor Amar Seilo Ballah Umm Marabba Gedid Mogara Dauro Shalkha Harun Tumbo Qawz Beringil Lerwa Baya Saq an Na`am Buhera Sineit Goldober Singeiwa Agra Nyala Labado Sereiwa Baddal Sigeir Dilling Kirarow Tumko Umm Sa Disa Um Kurdus Shaqq Girbanat Kasoleri Buronga Gerger Saheib Mabrouka al Huja El Lait Bendisi Diri Tono Abu Mukjar Ambara Deimbo Buddu El doma Gartaga Abou Sufyan Dalami Artala Shuwayy Rashad El Roseires Um Sarir @Adid Al Muturwed Dashi Wad Abu Kubum Dago Ed Damazin Tetene Keikei Hassib Gheid Renk Nurlei Um Boim Î Damba El kharaba West Lasirei Luma Solwong Murr Njumbeil Agi Abu Ghazal Qubba Girru Ajala Um La`ota Abu Marlenga Ma'aliah 1 Jawazat Karinka Hajar Wajage Markundi Al Marwahah Abu Ma'aliah 2 Banda Dimbala 25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"EUmm 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 36°0'0"E Timassi Ajura heitan Abu Edd el Faki Jibaiha Lujugo Milmeidi Gettin Ibrahim 42Bakau Fursan Kukur Kosua Dambar p Lagawa Sali Kulaykili Abu @ Tabanu Agabullah Adilla Wisko War e ho u se Aradeiba Gereida Manasis Anja C ap a ci t i e s 20 11 Katayla Muhajiriye Abu `Ud Heiban Um- 68Akoc Dukhun Gueighrin
    [Show full text]
  • SITREP#109 24Feb 2017Final
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #109 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 24 February 2017 Situation Update A total of 13 counties in 9 (28%) of 32 states countrywide have confirmed cholera outbreaks (Table 1; Figure 1.0). The most recent cases were confirmed in Yirol East, Eastern Lakes state on 22 February 2017. Suspect cholera cases have been reported in Malakal Town; Pajatriei Islands, Bor county; Panyagor, Twic East county; and Moldova Islands, Duk county (Table 4). During week 8 of 2017, a total of 4 samples from Yirol East and 2 samples from Mayendit tested positive for cholera (Table 3). Cumulatively, 185 (37.8 %) samples have tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 24 February 2017 (Table 3). Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 24 February 2017 New New Total cases Total Reporting New deaths Total facility Total cases admissions discharges currently community Total deaths Total cases Sites WK 8 deaths discharged WK 8 WK 8 admitted deaths Jubek – Juba - - - - 8 19 27 2,018 2,045 Jonglei-Duk - - - - 3 5 8 92 100 Jonglei-Bor - 15 - 7 1 3 4 51 62 Terekeka - - - - - 8 8 14 22 Eastern Lakes 12 5 - 5 2 8 10 478 493 - Awerial Eastern Lakes 1 5 - 1 5 12 17 176 194 - Yirol East Imatong - - - - - - 1 1 28 29 Pageri Western Bieh - - - - - 4 - 4 266 270 Fangak Northern Liech - - - - 3 7 2 9 1,144 1,156 Rubkona Southern - - - - 3 - 3 91 94 Liech - Leer Southern Liech - - - - - 17 4 21 435 456 Panyijiar Southern Liech - 2 2 - - - 5 5 214 219 Mayendit Central Upper 5 181 Nile - Pigi 3 2 3 5 173 Total 18 29 - 19 55 67 122 5,180 5,321 Highlights in week 8 of 2017: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan IDSR Bulletin
    South Sudan Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Epidemiological Update W46 2018 (Nov 12- Nov 18) Major Epidemiological Developments W46 2018 • Completeness for IDSR reporting at county level was 65% . Completeness for EWARS reporting from IDPs was 84%. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ • A total of 16 alerts were reported, of which 81% were verified. 0 alerts risk assessed & 0 required a response. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ • A suspect Ebola case was reported in Sakure, Nzara county, Gbudue state on 23/11/2018 tested negative for Ebola Zaire following preliminary GeneXpert testing in Juba. Further confirmatory testing to follow in UVRI, Entebbe, Uganda. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ • A new measles outbreak has been confirmed after three measles IgM positive cases were confirmed in Bor PoC with the earliest case reported on 20/10/2018. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ • At least 15 suspect measles cases including one death reported from Mabor Duang village, Aduel payam, Rumbek East with the initial case reported in week 41, 2018. Case and laboratory investigations are underway. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ • There was no new suspect Rift Valley Fever (RVF) case
    [Show full text]