Let's Transform Work! Recommendations and Proposals from the Commission on the Work of the Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Let's Transform Work! Recommendations and Proposals from the Commission on the Work of the Future A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Jürgens, Kerstin; Hoffmann, Reiner; Schildmann, Christina Research Report Let's transform work! Recommendations and proposals from the Commission on the Work of the Future Study der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, No. 376 Provided in Cooperation with: The Hans Böckler Foundation Suggested Citation: Jürgens, Kerstin; Hoffmann, Reiner; Schildmann, Christina (2018) : Let's transform work! Recommendations and proposals from the Commission on the Work of the Future, Study der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, No. 376, ISBN 978-3-86593-286-0, Hans-Böckler- Stiftung, Düsseldorf This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/173273 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de/legalcode www.econstor.eu KERSTIN JÜRGENS, REINER HOFFMANN, CHRISTINA SCHILDMANN LET’S TRANSFORM WORK! RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSALS FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORK OF THE FUTURE KERSTIN JÜRGENS, REINER HOFFMANN, CHRISTINA SCHILDMANN LET’S TRANSFORM WORK! This title is No. 376 in the Hans Böckler Foundation’s Study series that continues, with sequential numbering, the edition Hans-Böckler-Stiftung series in electronic form. PROF. DR. KERSTIN JÜRGENS, born in 1970, is Professor of Micro sociology at the University of Kassel, Germany. She has been researching change in the world of work since the 1990s. REINER HOFFMANN, born in 1955, is President of the German Trade Union Confederation and chair of the executive board of the Hans Böckler Foundation. CHRISTINA SCHILDMANN, born in 1973, is head of the scientific secretariat of the Commission on the Work of the Future. She is a specialist in labour market policy, (gender-neutral) digitali- sation, care work and family policy. KERSTIN JÜRGENS, REINER HOFFMANN, CHRISTINA SCHILDMANN LET’S TRANSFORM WORK! RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSALS FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORK OF THE FUTURE Translated from the German by Andrew Wilson © Hans-Böckler-Stiftung 2018 Hans-Böckler-Straße 39, 40476 Düsseldorf, Germany www.boeckler.de Let’s Transform Work! by Kerstin Jürgens, Reiner Hoffmann and Christina Schildmann is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-ND-NC). The text of the license can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode. The license refers to the original material only and does not extend to material from other sources (marked as such by a reference), such as images, pictures and quotes, the use of which may require separate permission from the respective copyright holder. Originally published in German under the title Arbeit trans formieren! by transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, Germany. Copyright © 2017 by transcript Verlag, Bielefeld. Cover: Manja Hellpap, Berlin with use of images from Shutterstock.com: 9comeback, Zapp2Photo, Aila Images Book design and typesetting: Manja Hellpap, Berlin Printed in Germany ISBN e-book: 978-3-86593-286-0 ISBN printed book: 978-3-86593-287-7 CONTENT Introduction 6 The Commission 13 PARTICIPATING IN THE WORLD OF WORK 16 STANDARDS FOR DIVERSITY INCOME 48 REVALUING WORK EDUCATION AND TRAINING 78 GERMANY, THE TALENT FACTORY WORKING TIME 108 TIME SOVEREIGNTY IS THE SOLUTION WORK ORGANISATION 140 PEOPLE TAKE CENTRE STAGE MIGRATION 166 COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY FRAMEWORK FOR CHANGE 190 SHAPING THE FUTURE Prospects 222 Glossary 226 References 228 INTRODUCTION JOINING FORCES TO SHAPE THE WORK OF THE FUTURE Just a few years ago it would have been impossible to put together a text in the same way as the present publication was compiled. Count- less meetings and telephone conversations would have been necessary in order for all the authors to discuss and agree on the various drafts. Today, thanks to modern information and communications technol- ogies, we can work together on texts regardless of geograph ical dis- tance, access all the necessary data, compare the various versions of documents and make all the stages in the writing and editing process visible. However, it is not only the drafting and editing of books or other texts that today rely as a matter of course on the use of digital technologies and collaboration in virtual networks. These forms of digital working have long since gained entry into the whole of eco- nomic life and affect the daily lives of us all. This has not only radical- ly changed work routines and ways of working together but has also given rise to new work tasks and completely new business models. When the Hans Böckler Foundation set up the ‘Commission on the Work of the Future’ in 2015, it was clear that the task facing the new body would not be an easy one. Its 32 members, drawn from the super- visory boards and works councils of large companies, the creative economy, trade unions, government ministries and various areas of academic research, were asked to reach agreement on the change in the world of work and, in doing so, to focus in particular on two ques- tions. Firstly, what will the work of the future look like? And secondly, what are the new challenges facing employment policy makers? In order to find answers to these questions, the Hans Böckler Foundation took the conscious decision to ensure that the Commis- sion would be composed of equal shares of academics and practition- ers and that the chair’s duties would be divided up in the same way. At the same time, the Foundation refrained from setting the Com- mission closely defined objectives or obliging it to produce a final 7 programme. Rather, an open discussion space was to be created with- in which as much light as possible could be shed on what was still largely uncharted territory for researchers and employment policy makers. The members of the Commission were requested to enter into genuine dialogue about their views and ideas for shaping the work of the future. In other words, they had been invited to join the TO JOINING FORCES Commission not so much as representatives of their organisations but rather as experts on work and employment, in both the present and the future. THE FUTURE OF THE WORK SHAPE The composition of the Commission and the involvement of out- INTRODUCTION side experts meant that a wide range of different perspectives and expe- riences, priorities and positions, questions and expectations could be utilised for its joint deliberations. For all this diversity, however, Com- mission members shared a curiosity about the radical changes that technological progress will entail and which are only beginning to be- come apparent. And they were equally united in their desire that their thoughts and ideas should help to ensure that the world of work offers as many people as possible a good quality of life and a secure future. The Commission’s work was shaped by a shared conviction that organising work in a way that puts human beings centre stage would make a significant contribution to social cohesion and the strengthen- ing of democracy. The importance of this aspect became crystal clear over the two years of the Commission’s deliberations. Over this peri- od, we saw how right-wing populist movements were gaining sup- port in Germany and across Europe. And beyond the borders of the EU, on the other side of the Atlantic, we had to watch as the funda- mental democratic principles of peaceful coexistence have been in- creasingly called into question. This report presents the key findings of our Commission’s deliber- ations. Since the aim was to sketch as sweeping a panorama as pos- sible of the conceivable paths along which the work of the future might develop and the requirements that might have to be met, it was not our aim to submit a final report presenting the ‘agreed policy position’ of all the Commission’s members. Given the body’s hetero- geneous composition, it was evident from the outset that this would not be possible. We opted instead for a different way of presenting the results. The present publication begins with an analysis of the changes taking 8 LET'S TRANSFORM WORK! place in the world of work. We describe the principal driving forces of these changes as identified by the Commission, outline some pos- sible development paths and enumerate the resultant challenges for business, society and policy makers. As a team of authors, we filtered out those key ideas and proposals from our debates on which there was a broad consensus among Commission members and on this basis formulated a whole series of concrete proposals or recommendations, presented in the text under the heading FOOD FOR THOUGHT. The ideas outlined in the sections thus marked were decided and voted on by the Commission as a whole. It was also our intention that this final report should provide an insight into the issues that gave rise to considerable controversy on many points but also, in many cases, to enthusiastic debate.
Recommended publications
  • Tailoring the Truth
    Working Paper Matthias Diermeier Tailoring the Truth An experimental approach to parliamentarians’ toleration of misinformation and responsiveness in Germany 11th August 2021 Redaktion/ Wissenschaftliche Koordination Julia Rakers Tel. +49 (0) 203 / 379 – 1388 Sekretariat Lina-Marie Zirwes Tel. +49 (0) 203 / 379 - 2018 [email protected] Herausgeber (V.i.S.d.P.) Univ. Prof. Dr. Karl-RuDolf Korte Redaktionsanschrift Redaktion Regierungsforschung.De NRW School of Governance Institut für Politikwissenschaft Lotharstraße 53 47057 Duisburg [email protected] Please cite as Diermeier, Matthias (2021): Tailoring the Truth, An experimental approach to parliamentarians’ toleration of misinformation anD responsiveness in Germany, Working Paper, published on: regierungsforschung.De Tailoring the Truth An experimental approach to parliamentarians’ toleration of misinfor- mation and responsiveness in Germany Von Matthias Diermeier1 Abstract The rise of populist radical right parties (PRRPs) is largely seen to have been triggered by a de- alignment between voters and political elites and to have triggered an increasing supply of misin- formation. Consequently, the German populist radical right party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is strongly associated with the notion that ‘faKe news’ endanger democracy (Reuter et al., 2019). Whereas most studies focus on ‘fake news’ dynamics in social media, this contribution analyses one-to-one communication between politicians and constituents in an experimental set- ting. For this purpose, all 2,503 German parliamentarians of the federal political system receive an artificial inquiry including a piece of misinformation that circulates among the different elec- torates. The experiment reveals a division in political communication between established parties and the AfD. Politicians of established parties seem to be intrinsically driven by the ideal of a good democratic representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Open-Minded Contents 3
    Open-Minded Contents 3 You won’t find a fairy tale. You will find your future! What comes to mind when you hear the term ivory tower? To be honest, we think of Rapunzel or elves. The bad news: we have neither. The good news: we have neither. What we do have, are lecturers, students, and researchers who are all involved in real life, working to develop the ideas of tomorrow together with industry Open-Minded 4 Partners and Networks 24 experts from the realms of science and business. We like when people turn our heads. We set high standards. Because we think in terms of possibilities Preferably as a team. Sounds to good to be true? Here’s proof: instead of limitations. www.elfenbein-den-elefanten.de Culture and Living 30 Research and Teaching 8 We set the rhythm together. We like to get to the bottom of things. And hit the right notes for everyone. © mert.photo © Especially in research and teaching. Open-Minded 5 Open-Minded We like when people turn our heads. Because we think in terms of possibilities instead of limitations. © mert.photo © Prof. Dr.-Ing. Andrés Kecskeméthy, Chair of Mechanics 6 Open-Minded Open-Minded 7 We. Together. We admit, the Ruhr metropolis is not New York City. But and students from all over the world. You find yourself in a it‘s pretty close. Walking across the two campuses of the big melting pot, the melting pot UDE. University of Duisburg-Essen (UDE), you meet scientists We explicitly promote exchange – of knowledge, of per- spectives, of talents.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Jürgen Rüttgers (Stand: 11.01.2021)
    Prof. Dr. Jürgen Rüttgers (Stand: 11.01.2021) Monographien und herausgegebene Sammelbände „Siegfried Honert / Jürgen Rüttgers: ABC der Abwasserabgabe. Erl. d. Abwasserabgabengesetzes in Stichworten unter Berücksichtigung der landesrechtlichen Ausführungsgesetze für Verwaltung und Wirtschaft, 2. Auflage, Köln 1983 Jürgen Rüttgers (Hrsg.): Europas Wege in den Weltraum. Programme – Proteste – Prognosen, Frankfurt / Main 1989 Jürgen Rüttgers: Dinosaurier der Demokratie. Wege aus der Parteienkrise und Politikverdrossenheit, Hamburg 1993 Siegfried Honert / Jürgen Rüttgers / Joachim Sanden: Landeswassergesetz Nordrhein-Westfalen. Kommentar, 4. Auflage, Köln 1996 Jürgen Rüttgers: Zeitenwende – Wendezeiten. Das Jahr-2000-Projekt: die Wissensgesellschaft, Berlin 1999 1 Jürgen Rüttgers: Worum es heute geht, Bergisch Gladbach 2005 Rau, Johannes: Lust auf Zukunft. Reden (ausgewählt und eingeleitet von Elisabeth Domansky; hrsg. v. Bodo Hombach, Fritz Pleitgen und Jürgen Rüttgers), Essen 2006 Jürgen Rüttgers: Die Marktwirtschaft muss sozial bleiben. Eine Streitschrift, Köln 2007 Jürgen Rüttgers (Hrsg.): Wer zahlt die Zeche? Wege aus der Krise, Essen 2009 Jürgen Rüttgers (Hrsg.): Berlin ist nicht Weimar. Zur Zukunft der Volksparteien, Essen 2009 2 Hubert Burda / Mathias Döpfner / Bodo Hombach / Jürgen Rüttgers (Hrsg.): 2020 – Gedanken zur Zukunft des Internets, Essen 2010 Jürgen Rüttgers: Parteien - übermächtig und überfordert. Zwanzig Jahre nach der Parteienkritik Richard von Weizsäckers, Marburg 2012 Jürgen Rüttgers: Mehr Demokratie in Europa. Die Wahrheit über Europas Zukunft, Marburg 2016 Jürgen Rüttgers / Frank Decker (Hg.), Europas Ende, Europas Anfang, Neue Perspektiven für die Europäische Union, Frankfurt a. M. 2017 Jürgen Rüttgers, Mehr Demokratie in Deutschland, Berlin 2017 3 Jürgen Rüttgers, „Er war ein ganz großer Häuptling“, Neues über Konrad Adenauer, Paderborn 2017 Jürgen Rüttgers, Guten Morgen, Europa! Neue Motivation für ein vereintes Europa in Frieden, Freiheit und Vielfalt, hrg.
    [Show full text]
  • European Climate and Energy Experts
    Journalism for the energy transition EXPERT EUROPEAN CLIMATE AND ENERGY EXPERTS Filters: Expert Type: Any, Topic: Elections & Politics, Location: Any Progressive, social-liberal, pro-European and green political party. Not represented in Parliament. Twitter: @progresivne_sk Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Media office [email protected] Ľ Far-right neo-Nazi political party. Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Office [email protected] ľ Conservative liberal political party. Twitter: @Veronika_Remis Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Press office [email protected] Liberal and libertarian political party. Eurosceptic, advocates the liberalisation of drug laws and same-sex marriage. Rejects strict solutions to climate change. Member of the governing coalition. Twitter: @stranasas Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Ondrej Šprlák, spokesperson [email protected] +421 910579204 Right-wing populist political party opposed to mass immigration. Second largest party in the governing coalition. Twitter: @SmeRodina Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Office [email protected] +421 910444676 Led by former Prime Minister Robert Fico, left-wing populist and nationalist party with a socially conservative and anti-immigration stance. Twitter: @SmerSk Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Press office [email protected] Ľ Won the last election and is the largest party in the governing coalition. Non-standard party without fixed party structures. Twitter: @i_matovic Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Peter Dojčan, media officer [email protected] Largest political party in terms of public support. Since the last election, it is represented by 11 deputies in Parliament. Location: Slovakia PRESS CONTACT Patrícia Medveď Macíková, spokesperson [email protected] +421 91716221 Social-liberal and populist party, one of the two largest political parties in Estonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Exzellenzinitative in Bildung Und Forschung Seit 2006
    Exzellenzinitative in Bildung und Forschung seit 2006 NRW School of GoveRNaNce Exzellenzinitative in Bildung und Forschung seit 2006 4 INhaltSveRzeIchNIS 1 Vorwort 6 2 Die NRW School of Governance am Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Duisburg-Essen 8 3 Ausbildungstrias und Meilensteine 24 4 Forschungscluster und Lehrschwerpunkte 48 4.1 Regierungszentralen – Innenhöfe der Macht 51 4.2 Jugendgerechte Politikvermittlung 66 4.3 Neue Gesellschaftliche Konfliktlinien 76 4.4 Strategische Kommunikation in modernen Gesellschaften 82 4.5 Politik und Regieren in Nordrhein-Westfalen 91 4.6 Leadership und Legitimität 101 4.7 Politikwissenschaft und praktische Politikgestaltung – Masterprogramm Politikmanagement, Public Policy und öffentliche Verwaltung 106 5 Ausblick für 2009/2010 120 6 Innovationen fördern – unsere Partner 124 1 VorwoRt voN UNIv.-PRof. DR. KaRl-RUDolf KoRte (DIReKtoR DeR NRW School of GoveRNaNce) Ein Ort gelebter politikwissenschaftlicher Forschung zweite wichtige Phase, um die Attraktivität des Seit dem Jahr 2006 haben wir eine intellektuelle Master-Studiengangs Politikmanagement, Public und emotionale Qualität eingebracht, um die Policy und öffentliche Verwaltung noch weiter NRW School of Governance zu einer wissen- zu erhöhen. Neue Lehr- und Forschungsräumlich- schaftlich anspruchsvollen Einrichtung der Uni- keiten zeugen von einer stetigen Professionalisie- versität Duisburg-Essen zu machen. Davon zeugt rung der NRW School of Governance. die nachfolgende Zweijahresbilanz. Die spezifische Unsere Professional School
    [Show full text]
  • Open-Minded Contents 3
    Open-Minded Contents 3 You won’t find a fairy tale. You will find your future! What comes to mind when you hear the term ivory tower? To be honest, we think of Rapunzel or elves. The bad news: we have neither. The good news: we have neither. What we do have, are lecturers, students, and researchers who are all involved in real life, working to develop the ideas of tomorrow together with industry Open-Minded 4 Partners and Networks 24 experts from the realms of science and business. We like when people turn our heads. We set high standards. Because we think in terms of possibilities Preferably as a team. Sounds to good to be true? Here’s proof: instead of limitations. www.elfenbein-den-elefanten.de Culture and Living 30 Research and Teaching 8 We set the rhythm together. We like to get to the bottom of things. And hit the right notes for everyone. © mert.photo © Especially in research and teaching. Open-Minded 5 Open-Minded We like when people turn our heads. Because we think in terms of possibilities instead of limitations. © mert.photo © Prof. Dr.-Ing. Andrés Kecskeméthy, Chair of Mechanics 6 Open-Minded Open-Minded 7 We. Together. We admit, the Ruhr metropolis is not New York City. But and students from all over the world. You find yourself in a it‘s pretty close. Walking across the two campuses of the big melting pot, the melting pot UDE. University of Duisburg-Essen (UDE), you meet scientists We explicitly promote exchange – of knowledge, of per- spectives, of talents.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Course Catalogue
    Common Course Catalogue Faculty of Social Science RUB Faculty of Social Sciences UDE Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaft University of Duisburg-Essen Ruhr-Universität Bochum Institute of Political Science Faculty of Social Science Georg Lammich Vira Bushanska Coordinator MA Development and Governance Departmental Coordinator/ International Services Lotharstr. 63, 47057 Duisburg, Room LF 326 Universitätsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum Tel.: +49 (0)203/379- 3182 Tel. +49 (0234)32-22966 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] https://www.uni-due.de/politik/institute.php www.sowi.rub.de/internationales/index.html.en Institute of Sociology Lucia Bonikowski Departmental Coordinator for International Affairs Lotharstr. 65, 47057 Duisburg, Room LK 075 Tel.: +49 (0)203/379- 2197 E-mail: [email protected] https://www.uni-due.de/soziologie/institute.php CONTENT Introduction 2 Campus Bochum Bachelor Level S The Vicious Cycle of (lack of) Development, Organised Violence and Forced Migration 4 S Comparative Regionalism in Theory and Practice 5 L Introduction to Humanitarian Action 6 S Change in democracies. Knowing and doing migration with social and material technologies 7 Master Level S Enjoying Theories. Simple strategies for dealing with theories 8 S Governance, Participation and Development 9 S Global Economic Governance in Theory and Practice 10 S Interest representation in the EU multilevel system 11 S Social Movements and the (un)making of Solidarities in a Historical and Contemporary perspective - Summer
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance Under Dispute: Conceptualising Narrative Legitimation Politics
    European Journal of International Security (2021), 6, 210–232 doi:10.1017/eis.2020.23 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2020.23 . Surveillance under dispute: Conceptualising narrative legitimation politics Christopher Smith Ochoa1* , Frank Gadinger2 and Taylan Yildiz3 1NRW School of Governance, Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, 2Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research University of Duisburg-Essen and 3NRW School of Governance, Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (Received 22 November 2019; revised 17 November 2020; accepted 20 November 2020; https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms first published online 22 December 2020) Abstract Current debates about surveillance demonstrate the complexity of political controversies whose uncer- tainty and moral ambiguities render normative consensus difficult to achieve. The question of how to study political controversies remains a challenge for IR scholars. Critical security studies scholars have begun to examine political controversies around surveillance by exploring changing security practices in the everyday. Yet, (de)legitimation practices have hitherto not been the focus of analysis. Following recent practice-oriented research, we develop a conceptual framework based on the notion of ‘narrative legitimation politics’. We first introduce the concept of ‘tests’ from Boltanski’s pragmatic sociology to cat- egorise the discursive context and different moral reference points (truth, reality, existence). Second, we combine pragmatic sociology with narrative analysis to enable the study of dominant justificatory prac- tices. Third, we develop the framework through a practice-oriented exploration of the Snowden contro- versy with a focus on the US and Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Sprachstrategien Und Rollen Politischer Akteure
    Sprachstrategien und Rollen politischer Akteure in der parlamentarischen Arena – Eine Inhaltsanalyse am Beispiel der Haushaltsdebatten in Nordrhein-Westfalen zwischen 2000 und 2010 Von der Fakultät für Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. rer. pol. genehmigte Dissertation von Terhorst, Stephan aus Wesel 1. Gutachter: Univ.-Prof Dr. Karl-Rudolf Korte 2. Gutachter: Prof Dr. Andreas Blätte Tag der Disputation: 01. Februar 2012 Dissertationsvermerk Diese Arbeit wurde von der Fakultät für Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Uni- versität Duisburg-Essen als Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. pol.) genehmigt. Name der Gutachterinnen und Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Dr. Karl-Rudolf Korte 2. Prof Dr. Andreas Blätte Tag der Disputation: 01. Februar 2012 Danksagung Mein Dank gilt Prof. Dr. Karl-Rudolf Korte, der dieses Dissertationsprojekt be- treut und von Beginn an unterstützt hat. Darüber hinaus danke ich Prof. Andreas Blätte, der als Zweitgutachter jederzeit mit Rat und Tat zur Verfügung stand. Bedanken möchte ich mich außerdem bei der Stiftung Mercator in Essen, die mich und diese Arbeit mit einem Stipendium unterstützt haben und mir damit die Möglichkeit gegeben haben, dieses Thema intensiv bearbeiten zu können. Großer Dank gebührt Dr. Timo Grunden, der jederzeit ein offenes Ohr für Rückfragen, Probleme und Korrekturen hatte. Ich möchte mich ganz besonders für die zahlreichen Gespräche, Anregungen, Hil- festellungen und seine Geduld, die er mir entgegen gebracht hat, bedanken. Ohne seine Unterstützung wäre diese Arbeit nicht möglich gewesen. Darüber hinaus gilt mein Dank dem gesamten Team der NRW School of Governance für die vielen gemeinsamen Stunden und die anregenden Gespräche zu meiner Arbeit. Unterstützung habe ich aber auch aus meinem beruflichen und privaten Umfeld erfahren.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehre Und Forschung 2009-2010
    Lehre und Forschung 2009-2010 Lehre & Forschung Die NRW School Schwerpunkte Ausblick Partner für NRW NRW School of Governance | Lehre und Forschung 2009-2010 2 Gliederung gLieDeRuNg Grußwort von Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ulrich Radtke, Rektor der Universität Duisburg-Essen.................4 Die NRW School of Governance: Unser Selbstverständnis. Von Univ.-Prof. Dr. Karl Rudolf Korte ....6 1 Die NRW School of Governance............................................................10 2 Themenschwerpunkt: Lehre und Forschung für NRW ..................................... 36 3 Projektbezogene Themenschwerpunkte . 46 4 Fazit und Ausblick für 2011/2012: auf dem Weg zum Wissenschaftszentrum für angewandte Politikforschung .................................114 5 Innovationen fördern: unsere Partner.....................................................120 3 NRW School of Governance | Lehre und Forschung 2009-2010 gRußWoRt von univ.-Prof. Dr. ulrich Radtke, Rektor der universität Duisburg-essen Die NRW School of Governance ist eine Ein- Intensivere Betreuung von der Auswahl bis zum richtung an der Universität Duisburg-Essen und Abschluss und über das Kerncurriculum hinaus- besitzt Leuchtturmcharakter. In den Sozialwissen- reichende Angebote im Master-Studiengang schaften gehört sie zu den Vorreitern deutscher „Politikmanagement, Public Policy und Öffent- Professional Schools mit spezifischen politik- liche Verwaltung“ führen zu vermehrten und wissenschaftlichen Schwerpunktsetzungen und besseren Studienabschlüssen. Gleiches gilt für befindet sich darüber hinaus
    [Show full text]
  • Lehre Und Forschung 2011-2013
    Lehre und Forschung 2011-2013 Fünf Jahre Themenschwer- Überblick – Gelebter Projekte und Publikationen NRW School punkt „Ethik“ Veranstaltungen „Wissenstransfer“ NRW School of Governance | Lehre und Forschung 2011-2013 2 Inhalt INHALT Grußwort von Prof. Dr. Bernhard Vogel, Ministerpräsident a.D. ....................................4 Die NRW School of Governance: Unser Selbstverständnis .........................................6 1 Fünf Jahre NRW School of Governance.....................................................10 2 Themenschwerpunkt: Welker-Stiftungsprofessur für Ethik in Politikmanagement und Gesellschaft ..........................................32 3 Projekte und Veranstaltungen 2011 – 2013.................................................44 4 Publikationen 2011 – 2013 .................................................................84 5 Überblick – Gelebter „Wissenstransfer“ an der NRW School of Governance ...............100 Impressum ................................................................................111 3 NRW School of Governance | Lehre und Forschung 2011-2013 GRUßWORT von Prof. Dr. Bernhard Vogel, Ministerpräsident a.D. Um ehrlich zu sein: Als mich die Einladung von begegnet sind. Die Leitung der Seminare der Professor Korte erreichte, im Wintersemester Masterstudierenden lag bei jeweils zwei oder drei 2012/13 eine Gastprofessur für Politikmanagement Studenten, die sich auf das vereinbarte Thema der Stiftung Mercator an der Universität Duis- intensiv vorbereitet und mir eine Woche zuvor burg-Essen zu übernehmen,
    [Show full text]
  • Publikationsliste Karl-Rudolf Korte
    Publikationen Univ.-Prof. Dr. Karl-Rudolf Korte Stand: 31. April 2021 Gliederung Monographien und in Co-Autorenschaft verfasste Bücher ......................................................... 2 Herausgegebene und mitherausgegebene Bücher ....................................................................... 4 Herausgeber von Reihen etc. ...................................................................................................... 6 Aufsätze in Büchern (Auswahl seit 2001) .................................................................................. 7 Aufsätze in Zeitschriften (Auswahl ab 2002) ........................................................................... 14 Monographien und in Co-Autorenschaft verfasste Bücher 1 Wahlen in Deutschland, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 10. überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage, Bonn 2021 i.E. 2 Wahlen in Nordrhein-Westfalen, 5. Auflage, Wochenschau-Verlag, Frankfurt 2020. 3 Gesichter der Macht. Über die Gestaltungspotenziale der Bundespräsidenten, Campus Verlag Frankfurt/M./New York 2019. 4 Bürger, Medien und Politik im Ruhrgebiet. Einstellungen, Erwartungen, Erklärungs- muster, Springer VS, Wiesbaden 2019 (mit Jan Dinter). 5 Parteiendemokratie in Bewegung. Organisations- und Entscheidungsmuster der deut- schen Parteien im Vergleich. Reihe „Die politischen Parteien der Bundesrepublik Deutschland“, Abschlussband (mit Dennis Michels, Jan Schoofs, Niko Switek, Kristina Weissenbach), Nomos, Baden-Baden 2018. 6 Politik im vereinten Deutschland 1998-2010, Landeszentrale für
    [Show full text]