Kaliningrad Oblast – the Flashback Edita Musneckiene, Lithuania
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SGGEE Guidelines Revision Last.Docx
Standards for Locations in the MPD May 31, 2012 Page 18 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Appendix A How to find locations in Eastern Europe I, Frank Stewner, would like to demonstrate with a few examples how I would find today locations of my family. In the 18th century, many members of the Stefner/Stewner family were living in the Salzburg area, Austria and migrated several times during the next 250 years: Salzburg -> East-Prussia –> Poland –> Volhynia –> Russia –> Volhynia –> Poland –> Germany. Many moved from Volhynia to Canada. Content: Village County State Country North East Page St. Johann-Huttegg St. Johann, Salzburg, Austria 471430 131149 18 Klein Degesen/Klein Lucken Nesterov, Kaliningrad, Russia 543148 222658 20 (Vyselki), Marijampole Mariampol (Marijampole), Marijampole, Lithuania 543300 232100 23 , Przasnysz, Przasnysz, Mazowieckie, Poland 530110 205248 24 Lipiny, Ciechanow, Mazowieckie, Poland 524824 202446 26 Makowitz (Makowice/ Novograd- Zhytomyr, Ukraine 503648 273300 28 Makovytsi), Volynskyi, Samara (Kuybyshev), Samara, Samara, Russia 531400 501000 31 Pawlodar (Pavlodar), , Pavlodar, Kazakhstan 521656 765744 31 Beschlejewka (Beshleyevka), , Chelyabinsk, Russia 541733 624956 31 Orenburg, Orenburg, Orenburg, Russia 514700 550600 33 Toptscha (Topcza/ Topcha), Korets, Rivne, Ukraine 504337 270313 33 Neusalz (Nowa Sol), Nowa Sol, Lubuskie, Poland 514800 154300 33 Posen (Poznan), Poznan, Wielkopolskie, Poland 522426 165453 34 Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 533334 100049 34 1. St. Johann-Huttegg in the Archdiocese of Salzburg, Austrian Empire I discovered that 8 Stefner/Steffner-families were forced to migrate from the Salzburg area to East- Prussia. This occurred during 1731-32 and was imposed by the Prince-Archbishop of Salzburg Leopold Anton E. Freiherr von Firmian. He ordered the expulsion of those Lutherans who did not convert to Catholicism. -
Lithuanian Synagogues: from the First Descriptions to Systematic Research
arts Article Lithuanian Synagogues: From the First Descriptions to Systematic Research Vilma Gradinskaite Independent scholar, 05224 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: The article presents an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania during the four major historical periods of the country—Lithuania in the Russian Empire (1795–1918), Vilnius Region in the interwar period and the independent Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940), the Soviet period (1940–1990), and the independent Republic of Lithuania restored in 1990. Each chapter of the article deals with the issues of synagogue research, heritage conservation and management, while the part about the restored independent Republic of Lithuania and modern days includes topical issues related to synagogue restoration, commemoration and putting them into operation. The study uses two different sources: archival materials and publications. Written sources and publications are reviewed in chronological order and start from the end of the 18th century. The study employs several research methods—the historical descriptive method, the comparative method and the analysis method. Keywords: Lithuania; synagogues; conservation; restoration; renovation; rebuilding; management; commemoration 1. Introduction The article presents several fields of study: (1) a review of the first descriptions of synagogues in Lithuania; (2) an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania; and (3) a brief reference to synagogue restoration, renovation, rebuilding, commemoration and putting into operation—topics which are currently particularly live in Lithuania today. It is not possible to understand the existing trends in synagogue research in Lithuania without considering the country’s past—the times of the Russian Empire, the interwar period and the Soviet period. -
In the Kaliningrad Region
INVESTMENTS AND BUSINESS IN THE KALININGRAD REGION Representative office of the NEW OPPORTUNITIES Kaliningrad region government MAXIMUM LENGTH GENERAL OF THE TERRITORY INFORMATION Sovetsk 108 КМ108 ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE KALININGRAD KALININGRAD Baltiysk Chernyakhovsk 15,1 K Gusev КМ² REGION TERRITORY 205 КМ SOVETSK BALTIYSK BORDER TERRITORIES 40 K PEOPLE 33 K PEOPLE 22 BALTIC SEA CITIES CHERNYAKHOVSK GUSEV N REPUBLIC 37 K PEOPLE 28 K PEOPLE W E OF LITHUANIA S Representative office of the REPUBLIC Kaliningrad region 1 government OF POLAND POPULATION 7 600 GRADUATES ANNUALLY 994 686 PEOPLE 60% 16 DATED WORKING-AGE HIGHER POPULATION EDUCATION 01/01/2018 INSTITUTIONS 9 900 5,2% PEOPLE MIGRATION UNEMPLOYMENT GROWTH RATE 66 PEOPLE/КМ² POPULATION Representative office of the DENSITY Kaliningrad region 2 government 12 PLACE IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION EDUCATION IMMANUEL KANT BALTIC FEDERAL UNIVERSITY Institute of Living Systems Engineering and Technology Institute Institute of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and Information Technologies Medical Institute European Business School Science and Technology Park KALININGRAD STATE and Factory 10 400 TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY Research Institute of Applied Informatics STUDENTS and Mathematical Geophysics IT and Situational Centre IN HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS Agriculture and Aquaculture Center for Medical Biotechnology Food Biotechnology, high-technology seafood processing PARTICIPANTS Energy Security Small-tonnage Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Marine Convention Training 5-100 The main marine university of Russia -
Elaboration of Priority Components of the Transboundary Neman/Nemunas River Basin Management Plan (Key Findings)
Elaboration of Priority Components of the Transboundary Neman/Nemunas River Basin Management Plan (Key Findings) June 2018 Disclaimer: This report was prepared with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 1 OVERVIEW OF THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS ............................... 5 1.1 General description of the Neman River basin on the territory of Belarus .......................... 5 1.2 Description of the hydrographic network ............................................................................. 9 1.3 General description of land runoff changes and projections with account of climate change........................................................................................................................................ 11 2 IDENTIFICATION (DELINEATION) AND TYPOLOGY OF SURFACE WATER BODIES IN THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS ............................................................................. 12 3 IDENTIFICATION (DELINEATION) AND MAPPING OF GROUNDWATER BODIES IN THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ................................................................................................................................... 16 4 IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES OF HEAVY IMPACT AND EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY ON SURFACE WATER BODIES -
Acdsee PDF Image
LIE TV V OS • • UDK 902/904(474.5) Li-227 Redaktorill kolegija: Doc. dr. Valdemaras Simenas (ats. redaktorius) (Lietuvos istorijos institutas, ViLnius) Dr. Anna Bitner-Wr6blewska (Valstybinis archeoLogijos muziejus VarSuvoje, Lenkija) Doc. dr. Rimantas lankauskas (Vilniaus ulliversitetas, Lietuva) Prof. dr. Eugenijus lovaisa (ViLniaus pedagoginis universitetas, Lietuva) Prof. dr. Vladimir Kulakov (Rusijos archeologijos institutas, Maskva) Prof. dr. Valter Lang (Tartu universitetas, Estija) Doc. dr. Algimantas Merkevicius (Vilniaus universitetas, Lietuva) Dr. Tomas Ostrauskas (sudarytojas) (Lietuvos istorijos institutas, ViLnius) Dr. Gintautas Rackevicius (Pili/{ tyrimo centras "Lietuvos pilys", ViLnius) Dr. Arms RadiQs (Latvijos nacionalinis istorijos muziejus, Ryga) Dr. Eugenijus Svetikas (Lietuvos istorijos institutas, ViLnius) Dr. Gediminas VaitkeviCius (Lietuvos istorijos instilulas, ViLnius) Dr. Vykintas Vaitkevicius (Klaipedos lIniversitelas, Lietuva) Doc. dr. Ilona VaskeviciUte (Lietuvos istorijos institutas, Vilnius) Dr. Gintautas Zabiela (Klaipedos universitetas, Lietuva) Dovile UrbanaviciUte (atsakinga sekreton':) (Lietuvos istorijos institutas, Vilnius) ISSN 0207-8694 © Lietuvos istorijos institutas, 2007 ISBN 978-9986-23-138-7 © Straipsni4 autoriai, 2007 )POKHH LlETUVOS ARCHEOLOGlJA. 2007. T. 31, p. 23-38. ISS 0207-8694 CULTU L IDENTIFICATION OF "TIlE CORDED • lOpHHK TERIALS" FROM BELORUSSIAN RIVER BASIN Hom HCTOPH- V ADZIM L. LAKIZA Results ofstudy ofheritage ofthe Corded Ware Culture in the Nemunas River basin are presented in the article. 2 groups ofsites are distinguished by the author: Bershty-Rusakovo group which formation was carried out on the basis of the local late Neolithic Neman culture under strong influence of alien components: "A-horizon" of the Corded Ware, Globular Amphorae, Single Grave, Rzucewo culture; Podgornaya group ofsites with features of the Middle Dnieper Culture. Keywords: The Late eolitthic, the Early Bronze Age, the Corded Ware Culture, the Neolithic emunas Culture, the Middle Dnieper Culture, the Trzciniec Culture. -
Why Kaliningrad Region?
Kaliningrad region Government NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUISNESS DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION MAXIMUM LENGTH NORWAY OF THE TERRITORY SWEDEN ESTONIA 108 КМ 108 LATVIA RUSSIA KALININGRAD LITHUANIA 15.1 REGION 205 КМ THS КМ² REGION IRELAND TERRITORY BELARUS ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER GERMANY POLAND 22 ENGLAND CITIES KALININGRAD >480 CHECH UKRAINE THOUSAND PEOPLE SLOVAKIA AUSTRIA MAIN CITIES FRANCE HUNGARY SOVETSK BALTIYSK SWITZERLAND ROMANIA >40K PEOPLE >36K PEOPLE CHERNYAKHOVSK GUSEV ITALY >37K PEOPLE >28K PEOPLE SVETLOGORSK >22K PEOPLE SPAIN BULGARIA PORTUGALPORRTUGALR Kaliningrad region Government GREECE POPULATION 60% WORKING-AGE POPULATION > 1 MIL PEOPLE DATED 01/08/2018 >10 THOUSAND PEOPLE PER YEAR >4.5 MIGRATION THOUSAND 5.2% GROWTH GRADUATES ANNUALLY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE >66 PEOPLE PER KM2 13 POPULATION DENSITY HIGHER EDUCATION 12TH PLACE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INSTITUTIONS Kaliningrad region Government ECONOMIC 524 $ 102 $ PERFORMANCE 33 536 ₶ 6 579 ₶ PER MONTH М2 PER YEAR AVERAGE SALARY RENTAL PRIСE FOR COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE 10.2 PROPERTIES BN $ 0.06 $ 400 $ 3.7 25 800 ₶ 641.58 BN ₶ kWh PER YEAR FOREIGN TRADE ELECTRICITY PRICE INTERNET PRICE TURNOVER 0.02 $ 2018 1.2 ₶ PER MIN OUTGOING CALLS 7. 2 2.08 0.74 $ 48 ₶ BN $ BN $ PER LITER 417.4 BN ₶ 130.5 BN ₶ PRICE OF GASOLINE GROSS INVESTMENTS CAPITAL REGIONAL DONE BY PRODUCT ORGANIZATIONS 2017 2018 Kaliningrad region Government SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE >129 1 BN ₶ MIL ₶ SEZ REGIME COVERS 2 BN $ 0.02 MIL $ THE WHOLE REGION SEZ REGIME IS REGULATED TOTAL AMOUNT MINIMUM BY THE REGIONAL AUTHORITIES -
Geography and Economy of the Kaliningrad Region: Limitations and Prospects of Development Sebentsov, Alexander B.; Zotova, Maria V
www.ssoar.info Geography and economy of the Kaliningrad region: limitations and prospects of development Sebentsov, Alexander B.; Zotova, Maria V. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Sebentsov, A. B., & Zotova, M. V. (2013). Geography and economy of the Kaliningrad region: limitations and prospects of development. Baltic Region, 4, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2013-4-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51241-9 Being an axclave, the Kaliningrad re- GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMY gion has been drawing attention of many OF THE KALININGRAD researchers in different fields. Yet the pros- pects for cooperation between the region REGION: and neighbouring communities in Poland and Lithuania, which once constituted an LIMITATIONS integrated social, economic and political AND PROSPECTS space, remain unclear. Media analysts and scholars alike tend to view the Kaliningrad OF DEVELOPMENT region as “double periphery”, since it is ex- cluded from major modernisation processes both in the European integration zone and in the Russian Federation. However, a de- A. Sebentsov* tailed study involving polyscale socioeco- * nomic indices, expert interviews, and sur- M. Zotova veys run contrary to this viewpoint. -
Argus Nefte Transport
Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils. -
Kaliningrad Study
Kaliningrad in Europe Kaliningrad in Europe A study commissioned by the Council of Europe Edited by Mr Bartosz Cichocki Linguistic Editing œ Mr Paul Holtom, Mrs Catherine Gheribi This study has been drafted by a group of independent experts at the initiative of the Committee of Advisers on the Development of Transfrontier Co-operation in Central and Eastern Europe, an advisory body established by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Although every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this study, the Council of Europe takes no responsibility for factual errors or omissions. The views expressed in the study are those of the authors and do not commit the Council of Europe or any of its organs. Factual information correct at March 2003. © Council of Europe, 2003 Foreword Walter Schwimmer Secretary General of the Council of Europe Kaliningrad, the city and the Oblast, are these days receiving a lot of attention from international circles. The Russian Federation has been actively raising the awareness of European institutions about the peculiar situation of the region, separated by mainland Russia and surrounded by land by two countries, Lithuania and Poland, soon-to- become members of the European Union. The perspective of the enlargement of the European Union to the Russia‘s exclave immediate neighbours is raising fears that the isolation of the Oblast would deepen and its economic and social backwardness worsen. The Council of Europe has responded to these legitimate preoccupation by taking recently several initiatives. In 2002, the Parliamentary Assembly held a thorough debate which led to the adoption of Recommendation 1579 on the Enlargement of the European Union and the Kaliningrad Region. -
East Prussia 2.0: Persistent Regions, Rising Nations
East Prussia 2.0: Persistent Regions, Rising Nations Maria Polugodina Theocharis Grigoriadis School of Business & Economics Discussion Paper Economics 2020/8 East Prussia 2.0: Persistent Regions, Rising Nations Maria Polugodina,∗ Theocharis Grigoriadis† Abstract In this paper, we examine the economic and political effects of the breakup of East Prussia into what is today Poland, Russia and Lithuania. We explore the dissolution of imperial regions into the boundaries of modern states, adding new insights to the research on the imperial legacies. We expect that German imperial legacies in the form of advanced economic institutions, and specifically East Prussian legacies of nationalistic and conservative political preferences, persist in the territories of former East Prussia in Poland, Russia and Lithuania compared to neighboring regions in their respective countries. We find no pattern of persistence in former East Prussian territories of contemporary Poland, whereas East Prussian persistence appears to be robust in Lithuania. We find strong evidence for the comparative persistence of political preferences in the Kaliningrad region, whereas we observe no economic spillovers. Drawing evidence from West German electoral data in the aftermath of World War II, we find that the presence of East Prussian refugees is conducive to conservative and nationalist support in the FRG. Hence, the East Prussian legacy relates primarily to the persistence of political preferences and migrating agents. Keywords: institutions, political economy, political preferences, migration, East Prussia, West Germany JEL Codes: F14, N74, O52, P51 ∗Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for East European Studies & School of Business and Economics, Garystr. 55, 14195 Berlin, Germany, Tel. +49 30 838 72979, [email protected]. -
Enclave to Exclave: Kaliningrad Between Russia and the European Union
Enclave To Exclave: Kaliningrad Between Russia And The European Union Brian Vitunic Columbia University The Kaliningrad region compels questions that neither Russia nor the European Union are ready to answer. Russian territory located outside of Russia’s contiguous borders, Kaliningrad’s unique geographic status stretches both the physical dimensions and conceptual cohesion of the European Union and Russia. When the surrounding countries Lithuania and Poland become EU members, probably in 2004, the 15,100-sq-km region will become a Russian exclave in “Schengenland.” The most immediate problem for the territory will be the impact of the border controls, visa regime, and customs agreements that new EU members must enact under the Schengen Agreement.1 Currently free of visa requirements, Kaliningraders would need Schengen visas for overland transit across Lithuania and Poland in the expanded EU. In addition to isolating with a paper wall the 1.3 million Kaliningrad residents from their own country of citizenship, restrictions on the movements of goods and people would damage Kaliningrad’s weak economy, which is propped by small-scale cross-border smuggling and legal trade,2 and potentially substitute a cordon sanitaire for active solutions to the region’s problems. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ivan Ivanov singled out the four main problems of the Kaliningrad territory at a 7 March 2002 meeting with European Commission officials and Polish and Lithuanian government leaders: visas, transit, energy, and fish.3 He noted that agreements with neighboring countries over fishery quotas address the fish issue; energy supply will be guaranteed by construction of a power-generating station in Kaliningrad as part of a Russian federal program in 2005. -
Palaeoseismic Deformations in the Eastern Baltic Region (Kaliningrad District of Russia)
Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2017, 66, 3, 119–129 https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2017.09 Palaeoseismic deformations in the Eastern Baltic region (Kaliningrad District of Russia) Olga Druzhininaa, Albertas Bitinasb, Anatoly Molodkovc and Tatyana Kolesnika a I. Kant Baltic Federal University, A. Nevsky St. 14, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia; [email protected], [email protected] b Klaipėda University, 84 H. Manto St., Klaipėda LT-92294, Lithuania; [email protected] c Department of Geology, School of Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] Received 12 October 2016, accepted 10 March 2017, available online 8 June 2017 Abstract. The article presents new data on sedimentological structures, which have been discovered at the Ryadino archaeo- logical excavation in the northeast of the Kaliningrad District of Russia (the Šešupė River Valley). Tongue-shaped and dome- shaped diapir-like structures indicate liquefaction-induced features. As the most plausible reason, the earthquake-induced shaking is discussed. A preliminary estimation of the time interval for the seismic event covers the period from the early up to the late Holocene. The reasons for seismic activity in this region can be related to neotectonic movements (including glacio-isostatic rebound) as recorded in the southeastern Baltic Sea area of the Fennoscandian ice sheet margin zone. The relation between a palaeoseismic event and the essential changes in the hydrographic network in the region is also discussed. Key words: palaeoseismicity, liquefaction, soft-sediment deformation structures, glacio-isostatic rebound, Šešupė River valley. INTRODUCTION According to Stewart et al.