Monorail Transport System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monorail Transport System Europaisches Patentamt 19 European Patent Office Office europeenien des brevets (fi) Publication number : 0 561 51 5 A1 EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION @ Application number: 93301364.1 @ Int. CI.5: E01B 25/12 (22) Date of filing : 24.02.93 (30) Priority : 24.02.92 US 840123 (72) Inventor : Spieldiener, Robert P O Box 356, Im Muhleholz 14 (43) Date of publication of application : FL-9490 Vaduz (LI) 22.09.93 Bulletin 93/38 Inventor : Spieldiener, Reinhold Aussichtsstrasse 23 (S) Designated Contracting States : CH-8704 Herri iberg (CH) AT DE FR GB Inventor : Saiko, Alfons Speerstrasse 26A @ Applicant : INTAMIN AG CH-8942 Oberrieden (CH) Verenastrasse 37 CH-8832 Wollerau (CH) (74) Representative : Barker, Rosemary Anne et al c/o Mewburn Ellis, 2 Cursitor Street London EC4A 1BQ (GB) (54) Monorail transport system. (57) A plurality of independent cars (12) circulate a main route (58) with shunting of select cars to passenger loading stations (180) without sub- stantial interference of the continuous circu- lation of the remaining cars on a circuitous main route, wherein the shunting is accom- plished by a high-speed switching mechanism (54, 66) having multiple segmented articulated rails (55, 105, 112) having one segment that is pivotally anchored for pivoting the rail. < CO 10 LU Jouve, 18, rue Saint-Denis, 75001 PARIS 1 EP0 561 515 A1 2 This invention relates to a monorail system and in ultimate destination before diversion from the com- particular relates to a monorail track system having a mon line to a station line enables the system to oper- high-speed track switching mechanism. ate at a passenger capacity that is typical of a public In the past, most systems devised for monorail transport system. Key to the operation of the system tracks have been train systems having multiple, inter- 5 is a low-mass, track switching mechanism, that incor- connected cars making periodic and predetermined porates unique features for high speed switching for stops at central loading stations. As such, the neces- diversion of select cars to a passenger loading or un- sity for a reliable, high-speed track switching mecha- loading station. A similar low-mass track switch mech- nism has not been high. Customarily, track switching anism enables cars at a passenger station to be re- is required primarily at repair depots and other ser- 10 turned to the main line upon receiving a clearance sig- vice areas where one or more cars or trains may be nal signaling safe reentry. sidelined for removal from service during off peak The individual cars of the preferred embodiment hours or repair. In situations where transport systems are designed to seat three adults with additional cab have multiple routes, and track switching is required, space for auxiliary seating, for accommodating lug- for route changes, switching mechanisms have sub- 15 gage, or passengers that are wheelchair bound. The stantial lead time to accomplish the track switch be- high speed track switching mechanisms can be used fore the passenger train arrives at the switching junc- for other functions in a rail system such as for divert- tion. ing cars to storage or repair facilities. In the monorail system devised, however, cars The invention will be described further, by way of are not coupled in an elongated train, but are individ- 20 example, with reference to the accompanying draw- ually propelled along the track and are selectively re- ings, in which: moved from the track route to a station for passenger Fig. 1 is a side elevational view, partially frag- loading. The remaining cars not directed at a local sta- mented, of a passenger car used in the transport sys- tion continue on the common route to their destina- tem of this invention. tion. In the preferred embodiment, the individual cars 25 Fig. 2 is a front elevational view, partially frag- are relatively small such that they constitute person- mented, of the car of Fig. 1 . alized vehicles equivalent to a common taxi cab. In Fig. 3 is a side elevational view of a track switch- such a situation, where each car carries from one to ing mechanism used in the transport system. four passengers, the number of cars on the service Fig. 4 is a top plan view of the one-rail switching route must be substantially increased and the switch- 30 mechanism of Fig. 3. ing action to divert a single car for passenger pick-up Fig. 5 is a side elevational view of a typical articu- or unloading must be virtually instantaneous in order lation joint in the track switching mechanism. that the unswitched cars are not delayed and are not Fig. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken on the lines affected by diversions of individual cars. 6-6 in Fig. 5. The absence of a safe and reliable, high-speed, 35 Fig. 7 is plan view of a two rail switching mecha- switching mechanism to remove cars from a common nism used in the transport system. service route and return them to the route after load- Fig. 8 is a side elevational view of a locking mech- ing or unloading has impeded the adoption of a per- anism used in the transport system. sonal ized-type of transit system. Fig. 9 is a top plan view of the locking mechanism The capital costs to construct a public transport 40 of Fig. 8. system requires a passenger capacity that was not Fig. 10 is a cross-sectional view taken on the previously possible for independent rail car systems. lines 10-10 in Fig. 9. The devised system with the high-speed, track Fig. 11 is a partial side elevational view of the switching mechanism has enabled the necessary locking mechanism of Fig. 8. passenger capacity to be achieved for a service route 45 Fig. 12 is a schematic view of a typical loading with multiple stations. By incorporation of a scheme station arrangement. that diverts only those cars to stations as command- Fig. 13 is a schematic view ofan alternate loading ed by passengers, the remaining cars on the service station configuration. route can proceed to their specified destination, by- Fig. 14 is a typical track networkforthe transport passing intermediate stations. This scheme enables so system of this invention. a continuous steady flow of cars along the service An exemplified monorail transport system of this route with a minimum spacing between cars. invention is designated generally by the reference nu- This invention relates to a monorail public trans- meral 1 0 and includes a number of individual discon- port system. In particular, the invention relates to a nected cars, as exemplified by the car 12 in Figs. 1 system that utilizes a plurality of independent cars 55 and 2 on a monorail track 14. The track 14 forms part that circulate a main route with shunting of select cars of a monorail track network 16 that typically is in the to passenger loading and unloading stations. The form of a continuous service loop 18 as schematically continuous travel of cars on a main circuit line to an illustrated in Fig. 14. 2 3 EP0 561 515 A1 4 Referring to Figs. 1 and 2, each car 12 has a cab The track plate is supported on a projecting support 20 on a supporting chassis 22 that is propelled on the strut 86 on the beams 48 and 49. fixed track 14 that is customarily elevated and of a T The detail of the typical roller unit 76 and pivot pin configuration to lock each car 12 to the track during 74 is shown in Figs. 5 and 6. The pivot pin 74 seats operation. The cab 20 is spacious with ample room for 5 in internal hinge blocks 78 on the rounded end 70 and three or more passengers and luggage. Pivoting through interconnecting hinge blocks 90 on the con- seats 24 enable convenient wheelchair use of avail- toured end 72 of the adjacent segment such that a able space. Expansive windows 26 allow for panor- hinge joint is formed allowing limited pivotal articula- amic visibility. The chassis 22 has identical front and tion. The roller unit 76 is welded to the underside of rear tracking wheel assemblies 28. Each wheel as- 10 an appropriate articulated segment for support of the sembly 28 is contained under a protective cowling 30 span created by the linked segments. For the light and incudes top support wheels 32, opposed pairs of weight cars used in this system, two roller units for side wheels 34 and fore and aft tracking rollers 36. each span is sufficient. The typical roller unit 76 of The side wheels 34 provide vertical stability to the Figs. 5 and 6 has a bracket 92 with journal pins 94 for cab and the fore and aft rollers 36 provide a smooth 15 a support roller 96 that rolls on a track plate 84. The ride over joints in the track. The stabilization side typical track plate 84 includes a curved lateral guide wheels 34 and tracking rollers 36 are mounted on piv- plate 82 engaged by a lateral roller 80. oting assembly arms 38. Pivot of the arms 38 allows Actuation of the single-rail switching mechanism the arms to clear the side wheels from the lip 40 of 54 is accomplished by spaced hydraulic actuators 98 the top plate 42 of the monorail track. This operation 20 mounted on extension arms 100 projecting from a permits the car to be vertically disengaged from the support beam 49 under the articulated segments 68 track for installation or replacement. position for car diversion as shown in Fig.
Recommended publications
  • The Las Vegas Monorail, an Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems Within the Resort Corridor
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 4-1999 The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor Cam C. Walker University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons Repository Citation Walker, Cam C., "The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor" (1999). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1439111 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Monorail 1 THE LAS VEGAS MONORAIL, AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION The Las Vegas Monorail: An Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems within the Resort Corridor By Cam C. Walker Bachelor of Science Brigham Young
    [Show full text]
  • Walt Disney World Resort Transportation Guide
    HOW TO TRAVEL AROUND PROPERTY UPDATED 03/04/18 FROM DISNEY’S ALL-STAR RESORTS LEGEND: BUS MONORAIL WATERCRAFT WALK TRANSFER Advise Guests to prepare for a sufficient amount of travel time. Taxi service is available at all of our resorts and theme parks. Pay attention to operating hours, inclement weather and downtimes. Do not give this guide to Guests. HOW TO GET TO MAGIC KINGDOM AREA MAGIC KINGDOM to MAGIC KINGDOM CONTEMPORARY to MAGIC KINGDOM or to CONTEMPORARY FORT WILDERNESS to MAGIC KINGDOM to FORT WILDERNESS GRAND FLORIDIAN to MAGIC KINGDOM or to GRAND FLORIDIAN POLYNESIAN VILLAGE to MAGIC KINGDOM or to POLYNESIAN VILLAGE WILDERNESS LODGE to MAGIC KINGDOM or to WILDERNESS LODGE SHADES OF GREEN to MAGIC KINGDOM or to TTC to SHADES OF GREEN MAGIC KINGDOM to CONTEMPORARY to TRANSPORTATION & TICKET CENTER (TTC) RESORTS MONORAIL ROUTE to POLYNESIAN VILLAGE to GRAND FLORIDIAN to MAGIC KINGDOM HOW TO GET TO EPCOT AREA EPCOT to EPCOT BOARDWALK to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to BOARDWALK SWAN & DOLPHIN HOTELS to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to SWAN & DOLPHIN HOTELS YACHT & BEACH CLUB to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to YACHT & BEACH CLUB HOW TO GET TO HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS AREA HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS ART OF ANIMATION to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to ART OF ANIMATION CARIBBEAN BEACH to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to CARIBBEAN BEACH POP CENTURY to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to POP CENTURY HOW TO GET TO ANIMAL KINGDOM AREA ANIMAL KINGDOM to ANIMAL KINGDOM ANIMAL KINGDOM LODGE to ANIMAL KINGDOM to ANIMAL KINGDOM LODGE CORONADO SPRINGS to ANIMAL KINGDOM to CORONADO SPRINGS HOW TO GET TO DISNEY SPRINGS AREA DISNEY SPRINGS to DISNEY SPRINGS OLD KEY WEST to DISNEY SPRINGS or to OLD KEY WEST PORT ORLEANS to DISNEY SPRINGS or to PORT ORLEANS SARATOGA SPRINGS to DISNEY SPRINGS or or to SARATOGA SPRINGS HOW TO GET TO WATERPARKS AND MINI GOLF BLIZZARD BEACH to BLIZZARD BEACH FANTASIA GARDENS MINI GOLF to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to SWAN & DOLPHIN to F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disney Monorail System
    The Disney Monorail System A National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark The American Society of Mechanical Engineers December 1986 Disneyland Anaheim, California The Disney Monorail System Since the time he first conceived the idea of Disneyland, The design of the cars, including their motive power Walt Disney was interested in the possibility of install- and braking and safety systems, could be utilized by ing a practical monorail system there. During a visit to any metropolitan transit system. For a city monorail, Europe in the Summer of 1957, Disney’s engineering however, the cars would have to be larger to provide group examined the experimental monorail developed for standing room. by the Alweg Corporation, near Cologne, Germany. The original monorail system at Disneyland, which After further investigation, the group reported to Disney opened in 1959, included two trains, one blue and one that this design appeared to offer the best prospects for red, and eight-tenths mile of track. A gold train and economy, stability, and all-around practicality, not only additional cars for the red and blue trains were added for Disneyland but for municipal transportation systems in the first few years of operation to expand capacity. in general. The Alweg Company had been operating their test monorail in Germany since 1952. Its beamway In June, 1961, the monorail was extended to the was on a long curve approximately one mile in length, Disneyland Hotel. This made it the first monorail in without grades. Disneyland and Alweg joined efforts America to run adjacent to a major highway (Harbor in the summer of 1958 to develop the basic system Boulevard) and to cross a city street (West Street).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, the Republic of the Philippines
    Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014 Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines Final Report February 2015 Prepared for: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC Japan External Trade Organization Prepared by: TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Japan Transportation Planning Association Reproduction Prohibited Preface This report shows the result of “Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014” prepared by the study group of TOSTEMS, Inc., Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Japan Transportation Planning Association for Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. This study “Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines” was conducted to examine the feasibility of the project which construct the medium capacity transit system to approximately 18km route from Sta. Mesa area through Mandaluyong City, Ortigas CBD and reach to Taytay City with project cost of 150 billion Yen. The project aim to reduce traffic congestion, strengthen the east-west axis by installing track-guided transport system and form the railway network with connecting existing and planning lines. We hope this study will contribute to the project implementation, and will become helpful for the relevant parties. February 2015 TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2003 • $10.00 / Las Vegas Monorail • Transport for London, Part 2
    January–June 2003 • $10.00 / Las Vegas Monorail • Transport for London, Part 2: London’s Jubilee Line Extension The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. erausa.org/headlights Contents Staff editor and art director January–June 2003 Sandy Campbell Volume 66, Number 1–6 contributors Raymond R. Berger, James N. J. Henwood, John Linden, Raymond J. Mercado, Frank S. Miklos, Chris Slaight and William Vigras COVER STORY Electric Railroaders’ Viva Las Vegas Association, Inc. Raymond R. Berger and Raymond J. Mercado show us how a modest 13 casino shuttle using ex-Disneyworld monorail cars has been transformed E into a world class transportation showcase. Officers & Directors president FEATURE Frank S. Miklos first vice president Charles A. Akins London’s Jubilee Line Extension returns to London with a fascinating photo essay second vice president; corresponding secretary Sandy Campbell 26 Raymond R. Berger of one of the world’s most modern subways. third vice president; recording secretary William K. Guild director Randy Litz treasurer Michael Glikin librarian Richard C. Evans trip & convention chairman Jack May membership secretary Lewis Hitch National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal A-Tower, Room 4A New York City Mailing Address P.O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, N.Y. 10163-3323 Subscriptions 1996 Jubilee Line units stable at Headlights is sent free to members of the ERA. Stratford Market Depot. 26 An application for ERA membership can be found on our website, or we will gladly mail one to you michael pead, wikipedia upon request. Back Issues COLUMNS Back issues of Headlights may be ordered from our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Power Rail for Third Rail and APM Systems Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail
    www.conductix.us www.conductixtransit.com Transit Power Rail For Third Rail and APM Systems Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail 3rd & 4th Rail • APM & PRT • Stinger Systems • Monorail 2 3 Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail For over six decades, Conductix-Wampfler has built a worldwide reputation as a proven supplier of transit electrification products. We are your partner of choice when you need to power mass transit, people mover, monorail, and advanced light rail systems. Our mission is to design and build cost effective, energy efficient products, and to provide dedicated engineering expertise and support services that meet or exceed your expectations. We consistently meet your project needs in a variety of operating scenarios. Every component design is verified to meet the requirements of the application in our fully staffed test facility and through years of field experience. We set the standard for long term reliability and performance. Conductix-Wampfler has the engineering know-how, practical experience, and testing capabilities to be a partner in your success! You can choose from a wide variety of proven aluminum stainless conductor rail designs for mass transit systems. If you need a special rail design to meet unique and exacting criteria, Conductix-Wampfler can supply it! ISO9001:2008 Certified • Downtown People Movers • Automated Guideway Monorails • Light Rapid Transit • Amusement Park Scenic Rides • Automated People Movers • Maintenance Stinger
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Primer
    Passenger Rail Primer Thurston Passenger Rail Workgroup November 2005 Passenger Rail Characteristics This document is intended as a primer introducing and familiarizing the reader with the basic definitions of passenger rail and providing a comparison of common transit services in 2005. It was developed to facilitate a discussion of passenger rail and other transit options in the Thurston Region, in preparation of a regional rail plan. In the next section, Passenger Rail Overview, the fundamental characteristics of light rail, commuter rail and intercity rail are covered. Complementary and Alternative Transit Options (primarily common bus transit choices) provides a wider transit context within which the passenger rail modes coordinate and compete. After investigating transit options individually, they are compared and contrasted in a chart of their characteristics, Summarizing the Continuum of Services. Other Rail Transit Technologies provides a brief overview of less extensively used rail options and the Appendices provide additional details and information. Additional resources the reader may want to consult include: • The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) website at www.apta.com • The Victoria Transportation Policy Institute (VTPI) website at www.vtpi.org • Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) website at www.bts.gov Passenger Rail Overview Introduction Passenger rail modes may be distinguished from one another based on a variety of characteristics – level of service, technology, right-of-way and operations. These characteristics are discussed in more detail in the other sections of this chapter. Like other transit services, however, in the most basic sense passenger rail modes break down by three distinct geographies – local, regional, and statewide or interstate.
    [Show full text]
  • Straddle-Type Monorail Systems with Driverless Train Operation System
    Hitachi Review Vol. 53 (2004), No. 1 25 Straddle-type Monorail Systems with Driverless Train Operation System Masamichi Kato OVERVIEW: With close to four decades of experience developing and Kenichi Yamazaki deploying straddle-type monorail systems, Hitachi has now added to its lineup of standard/larger model monorails with a smaller, standardized, Toshiharu Amazawa cost-effective monorail system. In a parallel development, Hitachi has refined Takayuki Tamotsu its DTO (driverless train operation) system and has now demonstrated the system in medium-capacity transit systems. INTRODUCTION monorail cars and other equipment for China’s HITACHI has close to 40 years of experience in Chongqing Monorail that is now under construction. developing and supplying straddle-type monorail Recognizing the company’s excellent reputation in systems as medium-capacity transit systems to building smaller, standard, cost-effective monorail augment the conventional larger capacity train and systems, Hitachi was also chosen to build Sentosa subway systems in urban areas. Express (new monorail system) connecting Singapore Starting with Tokyo Monorail that went into service to Sentosa Island (see Fig. 1). in 1964, a number of straddle-type monorail systems This article highlights the main features of Hitachi’s have been deployed throughout Japan including straddle-type monorail systems and DTO (driverless Kitakyushu Urban Monorail in 1985, Osaka-Monorail train operation) system. in 1990, Tokyo Tama Intercity Monorail in 1998, and most recently Okinawa Urban Monorail that began FEATURES OF STRADDLE-TYPE operating on August 10, 2003. Turning to the overseas MONORAIL SYSTEMS market, Hitachi recently won a contract to supply The primary features and advantages of Hitachi’s Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Workings of Maglev: a New Way to Travel
    THE WORKINGS OF MAGLEV: A NEW WAY TO TRAVEL Scott Dona Amarjit Singh Research Report UHM/CE/2017-01 April 2017 The Workings of Maglev: A New Way to Travel Page Left Blank ii Scott Dona and Amarjit Singh EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Maglev is a relatively new form of transportation and the term is derived from magnetic levitation. This report describes what maglev is, how it works, and will prove that maglev can be successfully constructed and provide many fully operational advantages. The different types of maglev technology were analyzed. Several case studies were examined to understand the different maglev projects whether operational, still in construction, or proposed. This report presents a plan to construct a maglev network using Maglev 2000 vehicles in the United States. A maglev system provides energy, environmental, economic, and quality of life benefits. An energy and cost analysis was performed to determine whether maglev provides value worth pursuing. Maglev has both a lower energy requirement and lower energy costs than other modes of transportation. Maglev trains have about one-third of the energy requirement and about one- third of energy cost of Amtrak trains. Compared to other maglev projects, the U.S. Maglev Network would be cheaper by a weighted average construction cost of $36 million per mile. Maglev could also be applied to convert the Honolulu Rail project in Hawaii from an elevated steel wheel on steel rail system into a maglev system. Due to the many benefits that Maglev offers and the proof that maglev can be implemented successfully, maglev could be the future of transportation not just in the United States but in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • MODERN TRAMS (LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT) for Cities in India 1 | Melbourne Early Trolley Car in Newton, Massachusetts
    MODERN TRAMS (LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT) For Cities in India Institute of Urban Transport (india) www.iutindia.org September, 2013 Title : Modern Trams (Light Rail Transit)-For Cities in India Year : September 2013 Copyright : No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by photo, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without the written permission of FICCI and Institute of Urban Transport (India). Disclaimer : "The information contained and the opinions expressed are with best intentions and without any liability" I N D E X S.No. SUBJECT Page No. 1. What is a Tramway (Light rail transit) . 1 2. Historical background . 1 3. Worldwide usage. 3 4. Trams vsLRT . 3 5. Features of LRT . 4 6. Comparison with Metro rail . 4 7. Comparison with Bus. 5 8. Comparison with BRT (Bus-way) . 6 9. Issues in LRT. 8 10. A case for LRT . 8 11. Integrated LRT and bus network . 9 12. Relevance of LRT for India . 10 13. Kolkata tram . 10 14. Growth of Kolkata tram . 11 15. Kolkata tram after 1992. 12 16. Learning from Kolkata tram . 13 17. Present mass rapid transit services in India . 14 18. Need for a medium capacity mass rapid transit mode in India. 15 19. Planning and design of LRT . 16 20. Aesthetics and Technology . 17 21. Capex, Opex and Life cycle cost of alternative modes of MRT . 18 22. Evolution of LRT model abroad . 20 23. LRT model for India . 21 24. Road Junctions & Signalling Arrangements . 22 25. System design . 22 26. Financing . 23 27. Project Development Process . 23 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Westlake Transportation Hub Strategy
    Perteet - LMN Architects - GVA Kidder Matthews City of Seattle - Department of Transportation WESTLAKE TRANSPORTATION HUB STRATEGY WESTLAKE TRANSPORTATION A blueprint for transit integration, multi-modal access, and HUB STRATEGY placemaking within the expanding retail core of Seattle Transportation Hub Improvement Themes: Place-Based Improvement Strategies: Transit Integration VIRGINIA ST Westlake Hub Strategy Key Recommendations: FEDERAL COURTHOUSE PLAZA 7TH AVE 6TH A COSMOPOLITAN Legend VE “Times Square” WESTLAKE A Westlake Station Accommodate streetcar expansion and Street-Level Entrance to station mezzanine (existing) VE Retail-Based Entrance increasing development through a series to station mezzanine (existing) Street-Level Elevator of signature pedestrian and public space to station mezzanine (existing) Third Ave Mezzanine Extension (proposed) PLAZA 600 improvements Open-Air Tunnel Entrance RT ST (proposed) WA Transit STE Monorail (with station pulled back from 5th Ave) WESTIN Streetcar (with proposed extension and new stop) TOWER BUILDING WESTLAKEWESW STLALAKEE SQUARES E Bus Stop (to be retained and improved) Bus Stop (to be removed) Bus-Only Lane (peak-period only with right turns allowed) 5TH A Bus-Only Lanes (all-day with local access allowed) 6TH AY VE W VIRGINIA ST A VE Pedestrian and Bicycle OLIVE Fifth Avenue Connector 7TH Sidewalk Extensions BANK OF AMERICA AVE Increase visibility and direct physical Traffic Calming (with special roadway surface) Add parking and/or extend sidewalk MCGRAWMCGCGRAWAW SQUARESQ connections
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Monorail Rapid Transit for North American Cities
    Considering Monorail Rapid Transit for North American Cities Ryan R. Kennedy Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................2 PART ONE—Defining Monorail..................................................................................3 A. Monorail Types…3 B. Characteristics of Monorail Technology...7 Conclusion...11 PART TWO—Straddle Monorail Systems and Technology.................................12 A. Aerial Structures...13 B. Straddle Monorail Vehicles...18 C. Straddle Monorail Implementation...25 Conclusion...27 PART THREE—Monorail as Cost-effective Urban Transportation.....................28 A. Monorail Capital Costs...29 B. Comparing Conventional Rail Systems to Monorail...33 Conclusion...40 GENERAL CONCLUSION..........................................................................................42 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................43 Cover Picture: Seattle Alweg Monorail built in 1962. Source: Seattle Times 1 INTRODUCTION Monorails have often been lumped together with flying cars as part of a naïve, cartoonish vision of the future. Despite the immense popularity monorails have had with the general public, this form of transportation has been mainly relegated to world’s fairs and amusement parks. Recently, however, a number of major, transit-grade monorails have either been built or are in the construction or planning phase. Japan is clearly the leader
    [Show full text]