DOCSLIB.ORG

Bangkok's First Monorails

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bangkok's First Monorails Case study Thailand Bangkok's first monorails Bombardier's complete mobility solutions for Bangkok's new automated mass transit lines will seamlessly integrate with the city to increase connectivity The rapidly growing megacity Bombardier is also providing project Bangkok is addressing increasing management, systems engineering urbanisation by expanding its public and integration, testing and transportation network. Bombardier commissioning for the full turnkey 400,000 has been chosen to provide the systems. Passengers daily. turnkey systems for two new high- Will benefit from the new monorail capacity monorail lines. In 2018, the company was also lines. awarded a 20-year services contract The new lines bring transportation for its INNOVIA monorail 300 links to new areas of the city, systems on both lines, by Bangkok integrate with the existing network Mass Transit System Public Co. Ltd. and ease congestion. Bombardier’s (BTSC) to provide full continuity total scope includes 72 four- between delivery and maintenance. 288 car BOMBARDIER* INNOVIA* INNOVIA monorail 300 cars. monorail 300 trains equipped with This latest contract will see To be delivered to Bangkok as part BOMBARDIER* CITYFLO* 650 Bombardier maintain the monorail of the order. automatic train control for driverless trains, comprising 288 cars, as well operation, and the supply of wayside as the system’s guideway switches sub-systems. and depot equipment. Turnkey solutions The Pink line, running from Khae Rai-MinBuri, will Thanks to its advanced features, such as CITYFLO accommodate the travel demands of northern Bangkok. driverless technology and regenerative braking, the Meanwhile the Yellow line running from Lat Phrao- system is extremely efficient to operate. Service is Samrong in the city’s eastern area will interconnect frequent, reliable and safe, meaning more comfort with four existing and planned mass rapid transit lines for passengers and more revenue for cities. including the city’s airport rail link. Delivering capacity and safety Making complex simple Communications-based train control is tackling the Bombardier is a proven turnkey system provider and has capacity challenge worldwide. It provides advantages managed over 70 complex transportation projects with for safe and cost-effective infrastructure management multiple suppliers and partners – as a one stop provider. for the full range of mass transit systems from heavy As system integrator for the new lines, Bombardier is metro to light rail and for all grades of automation. managing and integrating the supply of sub-systems including: vehicles, signalling, power, platform screen The CITYFLO 650 solution is a moving block, automatic doors, telecommunications, supervisory control and train control system featuring continuous, bi-directional data acquisition, track switches and depot equipment. train-track communication. Using radio, or LTE 4G, the exact position of the trains is known at every moment. This approach reduces implementation times, increases There is no need for physical vehicle detection systems cost control due to risk minimisation and ensures low which decreases equipment and maintenance costs. life-cycle costs and complete integration of all system components. CBTC reduces the headway between vehicles, enabling trains to run closer to each other compared to a fixed Ensuring performance and efficiency block system. CITYFLO 650 can be used as an overlay The INNOVIA monorail 300 system will provide a cost- to upgrade existing systems or for new greenfield lines. effective, efficient and attractive high-capacity solution for Bangkok. Designed to integrate seamlessly into the The monorails will run at speeds up to 80 km/h with a urban environment on a raised guideway, and able to maximum capacity of over 28,000 passengers per-hour, handle sharp curves and steep grades the system is ideal per-direction. for growing cities with existing infrastructure. Yellow line Pink line Eastern Bangkok Monorail Co. Ltd. (EBM) Northern Bangkok Monorail Co. Ltd. (NBM) 30.4 km elevated monorail guideway 34.5 km elevated monorail guideway 23 new stations, one depot 30 new stations, one depot 30 x 4-car INNOVIA monorail 300 trains 42 x 4-car INNOVIA monorail 300 trains CITYFLO 650 rail control CITYFLO 650 rail control Wayside systems and system integration Wayside systems and system integration General data Performance and capacity First contract awarded - June 2018 Max. speed 80 km/h combined projects Minimum curve radius 70 m in main line / 46 m in depot Type of vehicle Monorail Traction motor rating 167 kW in motoring mode 255 kW in regeneration mode Model INNOVIA monorail 300 system Transit system Mass transit system Air conditioning >39 kW Owner Mass Rapid Transit Authority Cooling capacity >39 kW Quantity 72 trains (42 for Pink, 30 for Yellow) Current collection 750 V DC Empty weight of train 59,000 kg Train consist 4-car trainset Passenger capacity End car: 14 passenger seats per train, 137 passengers (seated+standing) Car configuration Intermediate car: 16 passenger seats per train, 147 passengers Length of train 50,474 mm (seated+standing) Length of driving motor car 13,392 mm Width 3,142 mm (door closed) Height 3,120 mm (from top of roof to top Technical characteristics of GWB) Train configuration Driverless monorail Floor height 450 mm Nominal voltage 750 V DC Gauge Monorail guideway beam Motor Permanent magnet motor Width of entrance area 1,600 mm Bogies Dual-tire, single axle, Height of entrance area 1,930 mm straddle-beam bogie Floor fire resistance at least 30 mins Brake Regenerative and hydraulic brake Bodyshell Steel underframe and extruded aluminium sidewall & roof assemblies Automatic train control External sliding doors Micro-plug passenger door Type of project Mass transit system Interior LCD dynamic passenger information Technology CITYFLO 650 rail control system, PA, PIP (intercom) Automation Driverless Air flow rate Fresh air – 8 m3/h/passenger Type of operation UTO Emergency air – 12 m3/h/passenger Growing our local roots Bombardier is one of the few suppliers delivering technology from Thailand for Thailand. Project delivery, system integration and rail control design and implementation for the projects is being led from Bombardier’s regional hub in Bangkok. In 2017, Bombardier opened a dedicated state-of-the-art customer testing lab to support its CBTC projects in Asia Pacific. Since establishing its Bangkok site in 1997, Bombardier has grown its local team to over 600, working on transportation needs for Thailand, Asia Pacific and Bombardier Transportation celebrated the delivery of the globally. Signalling projects in Bangkok include the first state-of-the-art INNOVIA monorail 300 vehicles for upgrade and expansion of the existing BTS SkyTrain Thailand in October 2020. and the city’s new MRT Purple line. Bombardier is also supplying the first driverless mass transit system in The milestone was marked at a special event on Thailand, INNOVIA automated people mover (APM) 300 October 1, 2020, attended by Thailand Prime Minister system for the new Gold line. Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, as well as other senior government officials. H.E. Dr. Sarah Taylor, Ambassador Bombardier is honoured to be delivering the first of Canada to Thailand was also in attendance, along monorails in Bangkok and, as a committed and long-term with representatives from Mass Rapid Transit Authority partner in this market, looks forward to continuing to of Thailand (MRTA), Northern Bangkok Monorail Co. Ltd. provide our customers with smart rail solutions to (NBM) and Eastern Bangkok Monorail Co. Ltd. (EBM). improve connectivity across Thailand. Trademark(s) of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. © 2020, Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. 12038/11-2020/en * Bombardier Transportation 3354/16-19 6th floor, Manorom Building Rama IV Road, Klongton, Klongtoey Bangkok 10110, Thailand Tel +66 2 67 28 290 www.bombardier.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Paper's Title Starts Here
    Dual Rated Speeds Escalator in Rapid Transit System with Extended Ramping Up and Down KC Gan, LF Cai, SC Cheah, Hadi Wijaya, Melvyn Thong Land Transport Authority, Singapore Keywords: Dual rated speeds, automatic switching, rapid transit system, acceleration, ramping up, ramping down, vibration, jerkiness. Abstract. To cater for different needs of escalator operating speeds in rapid transit systems (i.e. higher rated speed of 0.75m/s during peak hours is for effective discharging of passengers while slower rated speed of 0.50m/s during off-peak hours is for elderly passengers), we have introduced the dual rated speed escalator. Conventionally, the switching between 2 rated speeds can be done either manually through a key switch or automatically when no passengers are detected on the escalators at pre-set timing. However, there is a possibility of not being able to change speed if there are constant passengers coming into the rapid transit station, taking the escalators. Therefore, this shortcoming will be overcome by setting up a schedule timetable to do the safe switching of escalator rated speeds with passengers riding on the escalators with extended ramping up and down without comprising any safety requirements. This paper presents the case studies conducted on an existing station where a performance–based approach was adopted. The timing for the speed ramping up/down between the 2 rated speeds has been increased to 30 seconds in order to reduce the acceleration which results in minimizing the acceleration (vibration) and the rate of change of this acceleration (jerk). The objective is to ensure that the passenger’s perception are imperceptible and do not experience any abnormal and sudden change of vibration and jerk during the switching of dual rated speeds with extended ramping up and down.
    [Show full text]
  • The Las Vegas Monorail, an Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems Within the Resort Corridor
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 4-1999 The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor Cam C. Walker University of Nevada Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons Repository Citation Walker, Cam C., "The Las Vegas Monorail, an innovative solution for public transportation problems within the resort corridor" (1999). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1439111 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Monorail 1 THE LAS VEGAS MONORAIL, AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION The Las Vegas Monorail: An Innovative Solution for Public Transportation Problems within the Resort Corridor By Cam C. Walker Bachelor of Science Brigham Young
    [Show full text]
  • Bangkok Expressway and Metro Public Company Limited (BEM) FEBRUARY 2021 Business Overview
    Bangkok Expressway and Metro Public Company Limited (BEM) FEBRUARY 2021 Business Overview COMMERCIAL ROAD INVESTMENT RAIL DEVELOPMENT Total Expressway Total Rail BL = IBL + BL Ex Infrastructure portfolio SES 38.50 km BL 48 km 38 stations For advertising in Stations & • Owns 99.99% in NECL Sector C+ 32.00 km PPL 23 km 16 stations Trains, Retailing and • Owns 90.52% in BMN SOE 17.06 km Total 71 km 54 stations Telecommunications • Owns 18.47% in TTW Total 87.56 km • Owns 16.64% in CKP BL Ridership PPL to be negotiated with MRTA Traffic Volume Jan 2021 Profit sharing in P&L Jan 2021 151,237 trips/day Expressway Ads on SES Y2019 173 MB 799,583 trips/day Growth -61.95% YoY 9M/2020 - MB Growth -34.30% YoY Avg. 2021 CD Revenue Avg. 2021 151,237 trips/day Y2019 783 MB Cash Dividend Received 799,583 trips/day Growth -61.95% YoY 9M/2020 586 MB Y2019 489 MB Growth -34.30% YoY Growth 4.30% YoY 9M/2020 483 MB BL farebox Tolls Revenue Jan 2021 Jan 2021 4.24 MB/day 17.33 MB/day Growth -60.05% YoY Growth -37.67% YoY Avg. 2021 Avg. 2021 4.24 MB/day 17.33 MB/day Growth -60.05% YoY Growth -37.67% YoY PPL O&M service income Annual Income apx.1,800 - 2,000 MB/year 2 Financial Highlights & Earnings Outlook REVENUE STRUCTURE TOTAL REVENUE As of 9M/2020 Unit: MB SteadyRevenue with Growth 20,404 trong Earnings with Good Dividend 19,087 S Rail : 34% 15,393 13,232 Stable Cash Flow Road : 60% 10,589 Road Gearing for new investment Rail Commercial CD Development : Other 6% 2016 2017 2018 2019 9M/2020 NET PROFIT DPS / EPS NET IBD/E Unit: MB Unit: THB Unit : Times 5,317* 5,435** 1.44 3,123 0.35* 0.36** 1.38 2,606 1.37 1.34 1,482 0.20 1.33 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.13 0.10 DPS EPS 2016 2017 2018 2019 9M/2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 9M/2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 9M/2020 Remark : * Including non - cash extra item from reclassified the investment in CKP ** Including non - cash extra item from reclassified the investment in TTW 3 Expressway Map Expressway Network Distance (km) Operator 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Assessment of Urban Transport Systems in Bangkok
    Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok, Thailand Siradol Siridhara Mahidol University BLAK Bangkok Metro and Vicinity Population 16.43 million Bkk Population 5.56 million Employment 10.42 million Income 39,459 baht/hh Bangkok Metro and Vicinity 35 million trips per day. ≈ 70% by private vehicles. Average Speeds Morning peak hour 10.7 kph Evening peak hour 14.2 kph Key Players Regulators, Project Owners & Operators Rail Bus Regulators Project Owners Project Operators 3 Current Rail Network Current Network: 5 Lines, 97 Stations, 142.9 km Light Green Line 32 stations 39.5 km Dark Green Line 13 stations 14.7 km Blue Line 26 stations 47.0 km Purple Line 16 stations 23.6 km Airport Rail Link 8 Stations 28.6 km Total 153.4 km Green Blue Purple Red Ridership (approx.) 1500000 trips/day4 Future Rail Network Future Network: Approx. 540 km Light Green Line 55 stations 66.5 km Dark Green Line 20 stations 22.5 km Blue Line 42 stations 55.0 km Purple Line 32 stations 42.8 km Orange Line 30 stations 35.4 km Pink Line 30 stations 36.0 km Yellow Line 23 stations 30.4 km Brown Line 23 stations 21.0 km Gold Line 4 stations 2.7 km Grey 39 stations 26.0 km Light Blue Line 19 stations 30.0 km Light Red Line 55 stations 58.5 km Dark Red Line 20 stations 80.8 km Airport Rail Link 14 Stations 49.5 km Total 504 km 5 Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok SUTI01 Extent to Which Transport Plans Cover Public Transport, Intermodal Facilities and Infrastructure for Active Modes MIN SCORE MAX 0 11 16 No Aspects Explanation Score 1 Walking Networks Little attention has been paid to pedestrian network planning, although the awareness of maintenance of walkways and other pedestrian facilities have 2 been raised from the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Walt Disney World Resort Transportation Guide
    HOW TO TRAVEL AROUND PROPERTY UPDATED 03/04/18 FROM DISNEY’S ALL-STAR RESORTS LEGEND: BUS MONORAIL WATERCRAFT WALK TRANSFER Advise Guests to prepare for a sufficient amount of travel time. Taxi service is available at all of our resorts and theme parks. Pay attention to operating hours, inclement weather and downtimes. Do not give this guide to Guests. HOW TO GET TO MAGIC KINGDOM AREA MAGIC KINGDOM to MAGIC KINGDOM CONTEMPORARY to MAGIC KINGDOM or to CONTEMPORARY FORT WILDERNESS to MAGIC KINGDOM to FORT WILDERNESS GRAND FLORIDIAN to MAGIC KINGDOM or to GRAND FLORIDIAN POLYNESIAN VILLAGE to MAGIC KINGDOM or to POLYNESIAN VILLAGE WILDERNESS LODGE to MAGIC KINGDOM or to WILDERNESS LODGE SHADES OF GREEN to MAGIC KINGDOM or to TTC to SHADES OF GREEN MAGIC KINGDOM to CONTEMPORARY to TRANSPORTATION & TICKET CENTER (TTC) RESORTS MONORAIL ROUTE to POLYNESIAN VILLAGE to GRAND FLORIDIAN to MAGIC KINGDOM HOW TO GET TO EPCOT AREA EPCOT to EPCOT BOARDWALK to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to BOARDWALK SWAN & DOLPHIN HOTELS to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to SWAN & DOLPHIN HOTELS YACHT & BEACH CLUB to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to YACHT & BEACH CLUB HOW TO GET TO HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS AREA HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS ART OF ANIMATION to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to ART OF ANIMATION CARIBBEAN BEACH to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to CARIBBEAN BEACH POP CENTURY to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to POP CENTURY HOW TO GET TO ANIMAL KINGDOM AREA ANIMAL KINGDOM to ANIMAL KINGDOM ANIMAL KINGDOM LODGE to ANIMAL KINGDOM to ANIMAL KINGDOM LODGE CORONADO SPRINGS to ANIMAL KINGDOM to CORONADO SPRINGS HOW TO GET TO DISNEY SPRINGS AREA DISNEY SPRINGS to DISNEY SPRINGS OLD KEY WEST to DISNEY SPRINGS or to OLD KEY WEST PORT ORLEANS to DISNEY SPRINGS or to PORT ORLEANS SARATOGA SPRINGS to DISNEY SPRINGS or or to SARATOGA SPRINGS HOW TO GET TO WATERPARKS AND MINI GOLF BLIZZARD BEACH to BLIZZARD BEACH FANTASIA GARDENS MINI GOLF to HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS to SWAN & DOLPHIN to F.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Future Planning of Railway Networks in the Arabs Gulf Countries
    M. E. M. Najar & A. Khalfan Al Rahbi, Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., Vol. 1, No. 4 (2017) 654–665 INVESTIGATION FUTURE PLANNING OF RAILWAY NETWORKS IN THE ARABS GULF COUNTRIES MOHAMMAD EMAD MOTIEYAN NAJAR & ALIA KHALFAN AL RAHBI Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East College, Muscat, Oman ABSTRACT Trans-border railroad in the Arabian Peninsula dates back to the early 20th century in Saudi Arabia. Over the recent decades due to increasing population and developing industrial zones, the demands are growing up over time. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is now embarking on one of the largest modern cross-border rail networks in the world. This is an ambitious step regarding the planning and establishment of the rail network connecting all the six GCC countries. This railway network will go through at least one city in each country to link the cities of Kuwait in Kuwait, Dammam in Saudi Arabia, Manama in Bahrain, Doha in Qatar, the cities of Abu Dhabi and Al Ain in the United Arab Emirates and Sohar and then Muscat in Oman in terms of cargo and passengers. The area of investigation covers different aspects of the shared Arabian countries rail routes called ‘GCC line’ and their national rail network. The aim of this article is to study the existing future plans and policies of the GCC countries shared line and domestic railway network. This article studies the national urban (light rail transportation (LRT), metro (subways) and intercity rail transportation to appraise the potential of passenger movement and commodity transportation at present and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Doi:10.1038/Nature11520
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION doi:10.1038/nature11520 Other intraplate earthquakes in the India-Australia plate off Sumatra and Coulomb stress changes for a selection of possible intraplate faults. Extensional events at the trench wall are located in positive Coulomb stress change areas for receiver faults striking parallel to the trench both off Nicobar Islands (~N180°E) and off Nias (~N135°E) (see Figure A1). Any Aceh or Nias slip distribution that has weak surface displacement does not predict a positive Coulomb stress change in these areas close to the trench toe. These normal faults are active as a result of extensional bending stresses at the trench wall46,47 that are unrelated to the NW-SE compression in the Wharton Basin. The strike of the nodal planes shown on Figure A1 is following the trench line orientation. These normal faults are neo-formed faults since the normal fault fabric (N105°E to N110°E) is not perpendicular enough to the trench-normal bending stresses to be reactivated (with the exception of the two southernmost events in 2005, in the Wharton fossil spreading ridge area). Slip on neo-formed reverse faults perpendicular to the NW-SE intraplate P-axis is not favoured by the Aceh and Nias earthquakes (Figure A1), which is in agreement with the historical style of deformation in the Wharton Basin. A minority of thrust faults mechanisms is recorded, while most of the events are strike-slip. Figure A2 shows increased Coulomb stress change on N110°E oriented vertical planes (right- lateral slip) when compared to N15°E oriented vertical planes (left-lateral slip, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand MRTA Initial System Project (Blue Line) I–V
    Thailand MRTA Initial System Project (Blue Line) I–V External Evaluator: Hiroyasu Otsu, Graduate School of Kyoto University Field Survey: August 2007 – March 2008 1. Project Profile and Japan’s ODA Loan Myミャンマーanmar ラオスLaos Thailandタイ Banバンコクgkok ◎ カンボジアCambodia プロジェクトサイトProject Site Map of the project area Bangkok Subway (MRT Blue Line) 1.1 Background Accompanying the rapid economic development in Bangkok starting in the 1990s, regular traffic congestion and the associated air pollution became evident in the urban area. The Thai government drew up the Bangkok Mass Transit Master Plan (produced by the Office of the Commission for the Management of Road Traffic (OCMRT) and hereinafter referred to as the “master plan”) in 1995 based on the 7th National Economic and Social Development Plan (1992–1996) for the purpose of developing a mass transit network and also for developing a network of ordinary roads and expressways to achieve steady economic growth, together with resolving the above-mentioned traffic congestion and air pollution. Furthermore, the development of the mass transit network proposed in the master plan is also specified in the subsequent 8th National Economic and Social Development Plan (1997–2000), and it is positioned as an extremely important national project in Thailand. The plan for the Bangkok mass transit system, part of the master plan, involves the construction of five lines that will radiate out and join the Bangkok Metropolitan Area (BMA) with the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR)1 together with creating a network 1 The Bangkok Metropolitan Region includes Bangkok, which is a special administrative area, and the surrounding five provinces of Samut Prakan, Pathum Thani, Samut Sakhon, Nakhon Pathom, and Nonthaburi.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Assistance for Project Implementation for Bangkok Mass Transit Development Project in Thailand
    MASS RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY THAILAND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION FOR BANGKOK MASS TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THAILAND FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS, CO., LTD. EID JR 10-159 MASS RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY THAILAND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION FOR BANGKOK MASS TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THAILAND FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS, CO., LTD. Special Assistance for Project Implementation for Mass Transit Development in Bangkok Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background of the Study ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Objective of the Study ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope of the Study............................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Counterpart Agency............................................................................................. 1-3 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CIRCUMSTANCES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF MASS TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT IN BANGKOK .............................. 2-1 2.1 Legal Framework and Government Policy.......................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Relevant Agencies....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2
    [Show full text]
  • The Disney Monorail System
    The Disney Monorail System A National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark The American Society of Mechanical Engineers December 1986 Disneyland Anaheim, California The Disney Monorail System Since the time he first conceived the idea of Disneyland, The design of the cars, including their motive power Walt Disney was interested in the possibility of install- and braking and safety systems, could be utilized by ing a practical monorail system there. During a visit to any metropolitan transit system. For a city monorail, Europe in the Summer of 1957, Disney’s engineering however, the cars would have to be larger to provide group examined the experimental monorail developed for standing room. by the Alweg Corporation, near Cologne, Germany. The original monorail system at Disneyland, which After further investigation, the group reported to Disney opened in 1959, included two trains, one blue and one that this design appeared to offer the best prospects for red, and eight-tenths mile of track. A gold train and economy, stability, and all-around practicality, not only additional cars for the red and blue trains were added for Disneyland but for municipal transportation systems in the first few years of operation to expand capacity. in general. The Alweg Company had been operating their test monorail in Germany since 1952. Its beamway In June, 1961, the monorail was extended to the was on a long curve approximately one mile in length, Disneyland Hotel. This made it the first monorail in without grades. Disneyland and Alweg joined efforts America to run adjacent to a major highway (Harbor in the summer of 1958 to develop the basic system Boulevard) and to cross a city street (West Street).
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation on Physical Distancing Measures for COVID-19 Mitigation of Rail Operation in Bangkok, Thailand
    Investigation on Physical Distancing Measures for COVID-19 Mitigation of Rail Operation in Bangkok, Thailand Somsiri Siewwuttanagul1*, Supawadee Kamkliang2 & Wantana Prapaporn3 1,2 The Cluster of Logistics and Rail Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Thailand 3 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saga University, Japan * Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Received 5/5/2020; Revised 2/6/2020; Accepted 23/6/2020 Print-ISSN: 2228-9135, Electronic-ISSN: 2258-9194, doi: 10.14456/built.2020.7 Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic is the global health crisis and was declared a pandemic on 11th April 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO). The most common solution is physical distancing which refers to avoiding close contact with other people by keeping a physical space between others. The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging mass transit services which are usually crowded with passengers. There is a need for an effort to save lives and stop spreading the virus, but metro transit still needs to provide services to people. Although the metro operators in Bangkok had a quick response to this pandemic by implementing physical distancing measures at stations and in passenger cars, effective levels of these measures are still under question. This study compares the physical distancing data surveyed during the COVID-19 pandemic and close contact transmission by breathing which defined the risk distance. The study investigates passenger levels of infection risk from close contact transmissions by breathing during the time at the metro station, based on the location where activities take place in metro stations: concourse level, platform level, and in the passenger car during the commute.
    [Show full text]