DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 21: Socioeconomics (Bristol Bay Drainages)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 21: Socioeconomics (Bristol Bay Drainages) PEBBLE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE DOCUMENT 2004 through 2008 (with updates in 2009) CHAPTER 21. SOCIOECONOMICS Bristol Bay Drainages PREPARED BY: MCDOWELL GROUP JIM BUELL STEPHEN R. BRAUND & ASSOCIATES SOCIOECONOMICS—BRISTOL BAY DRAINAGES TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 21-i LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 21-iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 21-xiv LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS .................................................................................................................. 21-xvi ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ 21-xvii 21. SOCIOECONOMICS—Bristol Bay Region ..................................................................................... 21-1 21.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 21-1 21.2 Study Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 21-1 21.3 Study Area ............................................................................................................................... 21-1 21.4 Previous Studies ...................................................................................................................... 21-1 21.5 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................................... 21-2 21.6 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 21-2 21.7 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 21-5 21.7.1 History and Culture .................................................................................................... 21-5 21.7.1.1 Pre-European Era ...................................................................................... 21-6 21.7.1.2 Russian and Other European Contact and Influence in the Study Area ... 21-6 21.7.1.3 Disease and Health Care ......................................................................... 21-10 21.7.1.4 Commercial Fishing ................................................................................ 21-11 21.7.1.5 Mining and Prospecting .......................................................................... 21-19 21.7.1.6 Trapping and Hunting ............................................................................. 21-19 21.7.2 Community Baseline Profiles—Iliamna Lake/Lake Clark Communities ................ 21-19 21.7.2.1 Nondalton ............................................................................................... 21-20 21.7.2.2 Kokhanok ................................................................................................ 21-34 21.7.2.3 Newhalen ................................................................................................ 21-47 21.7.2.4 Port Alsworth .......................................................................................... 21-60 21.7.2.5 Iliamna .................................................................................................... 21-73 21.7.2.6 Levelock ................................................................................................. 21-86 21.7.2.7 Pedro Bay ............................................................................................... 21-99 21.7.2.8 Igiugig ................................................................................................... 21-112 21.7.3 Regional Baseline Profiles—Nushagak/Bristol Bay Region .................................. 21-124 21.7.3.1 Entire Lake and Peninsula Borough ..................................................... 21-124 21.7.3.2 Balance of Lake and Peninsula Borough Communities ....................... 21-142 21.7.3.3 Bristol Bay Borough ............................................................................. 21-154 21.7.3.4 Dillingham Census Area ....................................................................... 21-173 21.7.4 Regional Basic Industry Overview ......................................................................... 21-193 21.7.4.1 Commercial Fishing .............................................................................. 21-193 21.7.4.2 Visitor Industry ..................................................................................... 21-218 21-i 03/14/2011 PEBBLE PROJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE DOCUMENT, 2004 THROUGH 2008 21.7.4.3 Mining .................................................................................................. 21-223 21.7.4.4 Government .......................................................................................... 21-229 21.7.4.5 Regional Economic Outlook ................................................................. 21-230 21.7.5 Governance ............................................................................................................. 21-232 21.7.5.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 21-232 21.7.5.2 Lake and Peninsula Borough ................................................................ 21-238 21.7.5.3 Bristol Bay Borough ............................................................................. 21-243 21.7.5.4 City of Dillingham ................................................................................ 21-244 21.7.5.5 Regional Nonprofit Organizations ........................................................ 21-244 21.8 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 21-246 21.9 References ........................................................................................................................... 21-248 21.10 Glossary ............................................................................................................................... 21-259 21-ii 03/14/2011 SOCIOECONOMICS—BRISTOL BAY DRAINAGES LIST OF TABLES Table 21-1, Bristol Bay Fishery, Non-resident workers and wages for seafood processing, 2008 ....... 21-18 Table 21-2, Nondalton, Population by Gender, 1990 and 2000 ............................................................. 21-21 Table 21-3, Nondalton, Median Age, 1990 and 2000 ............................................................................ 21-21 Table 21-4, Nondalton, Age by Count and Percentage, 1990 and 2000 ................................................ 21-21 Table 21-5, Nondalton, Race by Count and Percentage, 2000 .............................................................. 21-22 Table 21-6, Nondalton, Specific Alaska Native Designation, 2000 ...................................................... 21-23 Table 21-7, Nondalton, Households and Families, 1990 and 2000 ....................................................... 21-23 Table 21-8, Nondalton, Language Spoken at Home by People Age Five and Older, 2000 ................... 21-24 Table 21-9, Nondalton 2000-census Population Age Five and Older, Residence Status in 1995 ......... 21-24 Table 21-10, Nondalton, Employment by Gender and Place of Work, 1990 and 2000 ........................ 21-25 Table 21-11, Nondalton, Employers, 2007 ............................................................................................ 21-26 Table 21-12, Job Locations for Nondalton Residents, 2004 .................................................................. 21-26 Table 21-13, Funded Capital Improvement Projects in Nondalton, Fiscal Years 2002 to 2009 ............ 21-27 Table 21-14, Nondalton, Residents’ Commercial Fishing Activity, 1990 through 2009 ...................... 21-27 Table 21-15, Nondalton, Residents’ Crew-member Licenses, 2000 through 2009 ............................... 21-28 Table 21-16, Nondalton, Educational Attainment, 1990 and 2000 ........................................................ 21-29 Table 21-17, Nondalton, Occupations for the Employed Civilian Population Age 16 and Older, 2000 ...................................................................................................................................... 21-30 Table 21-18, Nondalton, Household Income, 1990 and 2000 ............................................................... 21-30 Table 21-19, Nondalton, Numbers of Households and Individuals Receiving Public Assistance, 2005 through 2009 ........................................................................................................................... 21-31 Table 21-20, Nondalton, Amount of Public Assistance Payments, 2005 through 2009 ........................ 21-31 Table 21-21, Nondalton, Housing Characteristics, 1990 and 2000 ....................................................... 21-33 Table 21-22, Kokhanok, Population by Gender, 1990 and 2000 ........................................................... 21-35 Table 21-23, Kokhanok, Median Age, 1990 and 2000 .......................................................................... 21-35 Table 21-24, Kokhanok, Age by Count and Percentage, 1990 and 2000 .............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska Park Science 19(1): Arctic Alaska Are Living at the Species’ Northern-Most to Identify Habitats Most Frequented by Bears and 4-9
    National Park Service US Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Region 11, Alaska Below the Surface Fish and Our Changing Underwater World Volume 19, Issue 1 Noatak National Preserve Cape Krusenstern Gates of the Arctic Alaska Park Science National Monument National Park and Preserve Kobuk Valley Volume 19, Issue 1 National Park June 2020 Bering Land Bridge Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve National Preserve Denali National Wrangell-St Elias National Editorial Board: Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Leigh Welling Debora Cooper Grant Hilderbrand Klondike Gold Rush Jim Lawler Lake Clark National National Historical Park Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Park and Preserve Guest Editor: Carol Ann Woody Kenai Fjords Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Katmai National Glacier Bay National National Park Design: Nina Chambers Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Sitka National A special thanks to Sarah Apsens for her diligent Historical Park efforts in assembling articles for this issue. Her Aniakchak National efforts helped make this issue possible. Monument and Preserve Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Below the Surface: Fish and Our Changing Environmental DNA: An Emerging Tool for Permafrost Carbon in Stream Food Webs of Underwater World Understanding Aquatic Biodiversity Arctic Alaska C.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Eastern North Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca Vitulina Richardii), Under the U.S
    Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Eastern North Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina richardii), under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Photo Credit: NOAA Fisheries/Dave Withrow Center for Biological Diversity 6 February 2020 i Notice of Petition Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Dr. Neil Jacobs, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Petitioner: Kristin Carden, Oceans Program Scientist, on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway #800 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 510.844.7100 x327 Email: [email protected] On November 19, 2012, the Center for Biological Diversity (Center, Petitioner) submitted to the Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) a petition to list the Iliamna Lake population of eastern North Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii) as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). (See generally Center 2012.) On May 17, 2013, NMFS issued a positive 90- day finding “that the petition present[ed] substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petition action may be warranted” and initiated a status review. (78 Fed. Reg. 29,098 (May 17, 2013).). On November 17, 2016, NMFS issued a determination that listing was not warranted because “the seals in Iliamna Lake do not constitute a species, subspecies, or distinct population segment (DPS) under the ESA.” (81 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • ORPC Rivgen Wake Characterization
    ORPC RivGen Wake Characterization Maricarmen Guerra Paris* Jim Thomson University of Washington University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA Seattle, WA, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] in turbulence due to eddies shed by turbine blades; and iii) complex interactions between natural and turbine ABSTRACT induced turbulent structures [6]. In this investigation we assess the wake formed behind Baseline and post-deployment flow conditions were mea- a horizontal cross-flow turbine installed on the Kvichak sured at the ORPC RivGen turbine site on the Kvichak river in southwest Alaska, USA, just downstream of the river in the vicinity of Igiugig village, Alaska. Mean sur- village of Igiugig. The small village is home to 70 peo- face flow and turbulence measurements were collected ple and its electricity source currently depends on an from a drifting platform equipped with a Nortek Signa- isolated power grid fed by diesel generators. The Ocean ture 1000Hz five beam AD2CP. Baseline measurements Renewable Power Company (ORPC) has set a pilot hy- indicate a maximum flow of 2.5 m/s and a 10% turbu- drokinetic energy project on the Kvichak river stream to lent intensity in the turbine vicinity. Measurements af- provide Igiugig with a renewable and locally produced ter turbine deployment and grid connection show a sig- source of energy. nificant decrease in surface velocity up to 200 m down- ORPCs RivGen turbine was successfully deployed, stream from the turbine and an increase in turbulence tested and connected to the local power grid during intensity up to 20% that extends about 75 m down- the summers of 2014 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Surveys in Headwater Streams of the Nushagak and Kvichak River Drainages Bristol Bay, Alaska, 2008 - 2010
    FISH SURVEYS IN HEADWATER STREAMS OF THE NUSHAGAK AND KVICHAK RIVER DRAINAGES BRISTOL BAY, ALASKA, 2008 - 2010 December, 2010 ©Bridget Besaw/TNC Prepared for by Dr. Carol Ann Woody & Sarah Louise O’Neal Fisheries Research and Consulting Anchorage, Alaska PREFACE The Nature Conservancy is an international not-for profit organization with a mission to preserve the biodiversity of the earth. Several years ago the Conservancy refocused programs to advancing local conservation efforts that contribute most to protecting globally significant strongholds of biodiversity. The Alaska Chapter determined that the loss of wild Pacific salmon productivity in Alaska would have a global impact because wild salmon have been severely compromised in other parts of the world. A focus on wild salmon in Alaska inevitably leads to Bristol Bay – home to the world’s largest remaining salmon runs. In the late 1990s the Conservancy began developing partnerships with local organizations to protect the long term viability of Bristol Bay’s salmon resource. A partnership with the Curyung Tribe of Dillingham, the Bristol Bay Native Association and the Nushagak- Mulchatna Watershed Council led to the development and the publication in 2007 of The Nushagak River Watershed Traditional Use Area Conservation Plan. During the time the Conservancy was working with this partnership, the discovery of a large copper and gold ore body on state lands in the watersheds of the Nushagak and Kvichak Rivers was announced. A flurry of new mining claims followed. The discovery, now known as the Pebble Prospect, is under active exploration and environmental assessment by a consortium of mining interests. The Anadromous Fish Act (AS 16.05.871) is the key State of Alaska statutory protection for freshwater habitats of fish in Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Quality in the Nushagak, Kvichak, and Chulitna Watersheds, Southwest Alaska 2009-2010
    Investigations of Surface Water Quality in the Nushagak, Kvichak, and Chulitna Watersheds, Southwest Alaska 2009-2010 Kendra L. Zamzow, Ph.D. Center for Science in Public Participation PO Box 54 Sutton, Alaska 99674 July 2011 for The Nature Conservancy 715 L Street Suite 100 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Investigations of Surface Water Quality in the Nushagak, Kvichak, and Chulitna Watersheds, Southwest Alaska 2009-2010 Prepared for: The Nature Conservancy 715 L Street Suite 100 Anchorage, AK 99501 Prepared by: Kendra L. Zamzow, Ph.D. Center for Science in Public Participation PO Box 54 Sutton, AK 99674 with editorial review by: Ann Maest, Ph.D. Stratus Consulting 1881 Ninth St., Ste. 201 Boulder, CO 80302 and Molly Welker Bristol Environmental Remediation Services, LLC 111 W. 16th Avenue, Third Floor Anchorage, AK 99501 July 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Study Area and Sampling Locations ...............................................................................3 3.0 Methods, Data Availability, and Relevant Standards .....................................................7 3.1 Methods .......................................................................................................................7 3.2 Available Data .............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Special Collections Division University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, Washington, 98195-2900 USA (206) 543-1929
    Special Collections Division University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, Washington, 98195-2900 USA (206) 543-1929 This document forms part of the Preliminary Guide to the Cannery Workers and Farm Laborers Union Local 7 Records. To find out more about the history, context, arrangement, availability and restrictions on this collection, click on the following link: http://digital.lib.washington.edu/findingaids/permalink/CanneryWorkersandFarmLaborersUnionLocal7SeattleWash3927/ Special Collections home page: http://www.lib.washington.edu/specialcollections/ Search Collection Guides: http://digital.lib.washington.edu/findingaids/search CANNERY WORKERS' AND FARM LABORERS' UNION. LOCAL NO. 7 1998 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON LIBRARIES MANUSCRIPTS AND UNIVERSITY ARCHIVES CANNERY WORKERS' AND FARM LABORERS' UNION. LOCAL NO. 7 Accession No. 3927-001 GUIDE HISTORY The Cannery Workers' and Farm Laborers' Union was organized June 19, 1933 in Seattle to represent the primarily Filipino-American laborers who worked in the Alaska salmon canneries. Filipino Alaskeros first appeared in the canneries around 1911. In the 1920s as exclusionary immigration laws went into effect, they replaced the Japanese, who had replaced the Chinese in the canneries. Workers were recruited through labor contractors who were paid to provide a work crew for the summer canning season. The contractor paid workers wages and other expenses. This system led to many abuses and harsh working conditions from which grew the movement toward unionization. The CWFLU, under the leadership of its first President, Virgil Duyungan, was chartered as Local 19257 by the American Federation of Labor in 1933. On December 1, 1936 an agent of a labor contractor murdered Duyungan and Secretary Aurelio Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratory Models of Intersite Variability in Mid to Late Holocene Central Alaska B.A
    ARCTIC VOL. 61, NO. 4 (DECEMBER 2008) P. 407– 425 Exploratory Models of Intersite Variability in Mid to Late Holocene Central Alaska B.A. POTTER1 (Received 27 November 2007; accepted in revised form 10 March 2008) ABSTRACT. Interrelated aspects of technology, site structure, and subsistence patterns in central Alaska are synthesized using a comprehensive database of radiocarbon-dated components. Microblade technology is examined with respect to broad patterns of technology, settlement, and subsistence. Striking changes in the archaeological record during the Late Holocene (~1000 cal BP), including the loss of microblades, are explored through three general models: technological and economic change within existing populations, population replacement or assimilation, and taphonomic bias. The evidence most strongly supports the first: a shift from multiseasonal large mammal hunting strategies with associated high residential mobility to exploitation of seasonally overabundant resources (caribou, fish) and increased logistical mobility and reliance on storage. Key words: Alaska, intersite variability, microblade technology, bison extirpation, Subarctic prehistory, subsistence economy, land-use strategies, Holocene RÉSUMÉ. Les aspects interdépendants de la technologie, de la structure des sites et des modèles de subsistance dans le centre de l’Alaska sont synthétisés en s’appuyant sur une banque de données exhaustives de composantes datées au radiocarbone. La technologie des microlames est examinée par rapport aux modèles élargis en matière de technologie, d’établissement et de subsistance. Des changements marquants sur le plan de l’enregistrement archéologique du Holocène supérieur (~1000 cal. BP), dont la perte des microlames, sont explorés à la lumière de trois modèles généraux : le changement technologique et économique au sein des populations existantes, l’assimilation ou le remplacement de la population, et l’écart taphonomique.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Maritime Russia and the North Pacific Arc Dianne Meredith Russia Has Always Held an Ambiguous Position in World Geography
    Early Maritime Russia and the North Pacific Arc Dianne Meredith Russia has always held an ambiguous position in world geography. Like most other great powers, Russia spread out from a small, original core area of identity. The Russian-Kievan core was located west of the Ural Mountains. Russia’s earlier history (1240-1480) was deeply colored by a Mongol-Tatar invasion in the thirteenth century. By the time Russia cast off Mongol rule, its worldview had developed to reflect two and one-half centuries of Asiatic rather than European dominance, hence the old cliché, scratch a Russian and you find a Tatar. This was the beginning of Russia’s long search of identity as neither European nor Asian, but Eurasian. Russia has a longer Pacific coastline than any other Asian country, yet a Pacific identity has been difficult to assume, in spite of over four hundred years of exploration (Map 1). Map 1. Geographic atlas of the Russian Empire (1745), digital copy by the Russian State Library. Early Pacific Connections Ancient peoples from what is now present-day Russia had circum-Pacific connections via the North Pacific arc between North America and Asia. Today this arc is separated by a mere fifty-six miles at the Bering Strait, but centuries earlier it was part of a broad subcontinent more than one-thousand miles long. Beringia, as it is now termed, was not fully glaciated during the Pleistocene Ice Age; in fact, there was not any area of land within one hundred miles of the Bering Strait itself that was completely glaciated within the last million years, while for much of that time a broad band of ice to the east covered much of present-day Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Trophic Ecology of Dolly Varden in The
    Population Dynamics and Trophic Ecology of Dolly Varden in the Iliamna River, Alaska: Life History of Freshwater Fish Relying on Marine Food Subsidies Troy A. Jaecks A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Washington 2010 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a master’s thesis by Troy A. Jaecks and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Committee Members: _______________________________________________ Thomas P. Quinn _______________________________________________ Andre Punt _______________________________________________ David Beauchamp _______________________________________________ James Hasbrouck Date: ___________________________________________ In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Any other reproduction for any purposes or by any means shall not be allowed without my permission. Signature ________________________________ Date ____________________________________ Table of Contents List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Juliana Pegues Dissertation
    INTERROGATING INTIMACIES: ASIAN AMERICAN AND NATIVE RELATIONS IN COLONIAL ALASKA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY JULIANA PEGUES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JIGNA DESAI, CO-ADVISOR ERIKA LEE, CO-ADVISOR AUGUST 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Juliana Pegues ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Portions of an earlier version of Chapter 3 were published in “Rethinking Relations: Interracial Intimacies of Asian Men and Native Women in Alaskan Canneries,” Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 15, no. 1 (March 2013): 55-66; copyright Taylor & Francis Group; reprinted with permission of Taylor & Francis Group. A slightly different version of Chapter 4 will be published in “’Picture Man’: Shoki Kayamori and the Photography of Colonial Encounter in Alaska, 1912-1941,” College Literature: A Journal of Critical Literary Studies. Thank you to the editors and special edition editors of these journals. Many people have guided and supported me throughout my dissertation process, and I’m delighted to have the opportunity to recognize them. I am grateful to my committee, exemplary scholars who challenge me to deeply engage and critically think through my project. My advisors Erika Lee and Jigna Desai have been everything I could ask for and more, both phenomenal academics who motivate me to be a better scholar, teacher, parent, and community member. Erika is a formidable historian who has provided me with invaluable training, always asking the important “why?” of my research and project, especially my contributions to Asian American studies. Erika encourages me to “embrace my inner historian,” and I would like to state for the record that she inspires me time and time again to research and write important, compelling, and creative historical narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Community Profiles 2000-2010
    NOAA-TM-AFSC-259 – Volume 8 Community Profiles for North Pacific Fisheries – Alaska: Pilot Point Pilot Point People and Place Location 1 Pilot Point is located on the northern coast of the Alaska Peninsula, on the east shore of Ugashik Bay. The community lies 84 air miles south of King Salmon and 368 air miles southwest of Anchorage. Pilot Point is in the Lake and Peninsula Borough Census Area and the Kvichak Recording District. The City encompasses 25.4 square miles of land and 115.1 square miles of water. Demographic Profile 2 In 2010, there were 68 inhabitants in Pilot Point, making it the 283rd largest of 352 total Alaskan communities with recorded populations that year. Pilot Point first appeared in U.S. Decennial Census records in 1970. The population of Pilot Point almost doubled between 1990 and 2000, then declined by 32% between 2000 and 2010. According to Alaska Department of Labor estimates, between 2000 and 2009, the population of permanent residents decreased by 34%, with an average annual growth rate of -1.55%. The change in population from 1990 to 2010 is provided in Table 1. In a survey conducted by NOAA’s Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC) in 2011, community leaders reported that, in addition to year-round residents, approximately 1,825 seasonal workers or transients are present in Pilot Point each year between May and August. They reported that the annual population peak takes place in June and July, and population fluctuations are entirely driven by employment in commercial fishing. It is also important to note that some people from the nearby village of Ugashik live part of the year in Pilot Point as well.3 In 2010, a majority of Pilot Point residents identified themselves as American Indian and Alaska Native (66.2%), 16.2% identified themselves as White, and 17.2% identified with two or more races.
    [Show full text]