Amphibian Conservation in the Caatinga Biome and Semiarid Region of Brazil
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Herpetologica, 68(1), 2012, 31–47 E 2012 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION IN THE CAATINGA BIOME AND SEMIARID REGION OF BRAZIL 1,3 2 MILENA CAMARDELLI AND MARCELO F. NAPOLI 1Programa de Po´s-Graduac¸a˜o em Ecologia e Biomonitoramento, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Bara˜o de Jeremoabo, Campus Universita´rio de Ondina, 40170-115 Salvador, Bahia, Brazil 2Museu de Zoologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Bara˜o de Jeremoabo, Campus Universita´rio de Ondina, 40170-115 Salvador, Bahia, Brazil ABSTRACT: The Brazilian Ministry of the Environment (Ministe´rio Do Meio Ambiente, MMA) proposed defining priority areas for Brazilian biodiversity conservation in 2007, but to date, no definitions of priority areas for amphibian conservation have been developed for the Caatinga biome or the semiarid region of Brazil. In this study, we searched for ‘‘hot spots’’ of amphibians in these two regions and assessed whether the priority areas established by the MMA coincided with those suitable for amphibian conservation. We determined amphibian hot spots by means of three estimates: areas of endemism, areas of high species richness, and areas with species that are threatened, rare, or have very limited distributions. We then assessed the degree of coincidence between amphibian hot spots and the priority areas of the MMA based on the current conservation units. We analyzed areas of endemism with the use of a parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE) on quadrats. The Caatinga biome and semiarid region showed four and six areas of endemism, respectively, mainly associated with mountainous areas that are covered by isolated forests and positively correlated with species richness. All areas of endemism coincided with one or more priority areas defined by the MMA. We identify 15 priority areas for amphibian conservation in the Caatinga biome and semiarid region, including the creation of new full-protection conservation units. RESUMO: A definic¸a˜odea´reas priorita´rias para a conservac¸a˜o da biodiversidade brasileira foi proposta pelo Ministe´rio do Meio Ambiente (MMA) em 2007, mas ate´ o presente momento na˜oha´ estudo meto´dico que defina a´reas priorita´rias para a conservac¸a˜o de anfı´bios no bioma Caatinga ou no Semia´rido brasileiro. Neste estudo, buscamos por ‘‘hot spots’’ de anfı´bios nestes dois polı´gonos e verificamos se as a´reas priorita´rias do MMA coincidem com a´reas adequadas para a conservac¸a˜o dos anfı´bios. Determinamos os hot spots de anfı´bios por meio de treˆs estimadores: a´reas de endemismo, a´reas de alta riqueza de espe´cies e a´reas com espe´cies ameac¸adas, raras e/ou com padro˜es de distribuic¸a˜o restrita. Em seguida, acessamos o grau de coincideˆncia entre hot spots de anfı´bios e a´reas priorita´rias do MMA, igualmente considerando as unidades de conservac¸a˜o correntemente instaladas. A detecc¸a˜odea´reas de endemismo foi realizada pela Ana´lise de Parcimoˆnia de Endemicidade (PAE), usando quadrados. O bioma Caatinga e o Semia´rido apresentaram, respectivamente, quatro e seis a´reas de endemismo, principalmente associadas a a´reas montanhosas cobertas por florestas isoladas, e estiveram positivamente correlacionadas a` riqueza de espe´cies. Todas as a´reas de endemismo coincidiram com uma ou mais a´reas priorita´rias definidas pelo MMA. No´s identificamos 15 a´reas priorita´rias para conservac¸a˜o de anfı´bios no bioma Caatinga e Semia´rido, ale´m da criac¸a˜o de novas unidades de conservac¸a˜o de protec¸a˜o integral no Brasil. Key words: Amphibians; Complementarity analysis; Parsimony analysis of endemicity; Priority areas; Species richness; Threatened species THE DETERMINATION of priority areas for the 2004). To meet these obligations, the Brazilian conservation of biological diversity has received Ministry of the Environment (Ministe´rio Do much attention in recent years (Tabarelli and Meio Ambiente, MMA) developed its first Silva, 2004). The Convention on Biological ‘‘assessment and identification of priority areas Diversity (CBD), signed during the UN Con- and actions for the conservation of biomes’’ ference on Environment and Development between 1998 and 2000, and updated it in 2007. (UNCED) in 1992, aimed to generate guide- The definition of the priority areas was based on lines to reconcile the economic development of the available information about biodiversity and nations with the conservation and sustainable human pressures, in addition to the experience use of biological resources (Tabarelli and Silva, of researchers, and the degrees of priority were defined with the use of criteria for biolo- 3 CORRESPONDENCE: e-mail, milenacamardelli@yahoo. gical richness, areas of endemism, and the distri- com.br butions of endangered species. Furthermore, 31 32 HERPETOLOGICA [Vol. 68, No. 1 the importance of these areas to traditional With respect to amphibians, there have communities and indigenous peoples and their been no methodical studies that define vulnerability were also taken into account (MMA, priority areas for their conservation in the 2007). Caatinga biome or in the semiarid region of An important element of subjectivity in the Brazil, which points to the urgent need to test listing of priority areas proposed by the MMA whether the priority areas listed by the MMA (2007) is that a sizeable part of the information (2007) for biomes in the Brazilian territory used in the delineation of these areas came from include the hot spots for amphibians in these personal and single observations or from non- regions. If the congruence is not complete, methodical or poorly designed studies (M.F. then it will be necessary to redefine the Napoli, member of the Caatinga Thematic priority areas for conservation or to propose Group of MMA, personal communication, new areas to ensure the conservation of hot 2007). A second important aspect is that the spots for amphibians in these areas. level of knowledge and interest in each Brazilian This study aims (1) to identify hot spots of biome and in the various biological groups that amphibians in the Caatinga biome and semiarid make up the Brazilian biodiversity is uneven, region of Brazil by combining areas with high which led to an arbitrary and subjective levels of endemism and species richness with selection of priority areas for conservation. areas that contain species that are threatened, Because of this history, it is necessary to rare, or have very limited distributions; and (2) determine the degree of congruence between to determine whether the priority areas defined the priority areas for Brazilian biodiversity by the MMA (2007) coincide with areas conservation as defined by the MMA (2007) important to amphibian conservation. and important areas for conservation of the various taxonomic groups defined by biolog- MATERIALS AND METHODS ical studies conducted methodically for this purpose, such as those aimed at identifying Study Area areas of endemism. Areas of endemism The Caatinga is the only biome unique to include unique biota that result from various Brazil and has been recognized as a biogeo- types of isolation and that, once identified, can graphic province of the Chacoan subregion illuminate the natural processes that led to (Morrone, 2006). This biome is distributed their origins (Silva, 2008). throughout the northeast region of Brazil Another important question to be answered (except for the State of Maranha˜o) and the is whether the Caatinga biome and the northern part of the State of Minas Gerais 2 Brazilian semiarid region are identical with (Fig. 1), covers an area of 852,261 km , and respect to biological diversity, as they largely represents 11% of the Brazilian territory overlap geographically. Nevertheless, a biome, (MMA, 2007). The Caatinga biome is charac- as conceived by the Instituto Brasileiro de terized by semiarid to arid climates (Santos Geografia e Estatı´stica (IBGE, 2004a), is a set and Tabarelli, 2003) with long dry seasons, of vegetation types identifiable on a regional irregular rainfall (concentrated in the sum- scale, including its allied fauna and flora, with mer), average annual precipitation of 400 to similar geoclimatic conditions and a shared 600 mm (Ab’Sa´ber, 1977), high annual history of changes that resulted in biological temperatures (ca. 27uC), and a large temper- diversity. On the other hand, the semiarid ature range (MMA, 2007). region is defined based on Brazilian drylands Although the most common landscape in with similar climatic characteristics (Ministe´rio the Caatinga biome is the steppe savanna, da Integrac¸a˜o Nacional [MIN], 2005): average which is composed of thorny and deciduous annual rainfall, aridity index (the relationship plants and rivers that are largely intermittent between rainfall and potential evapotranspira- and seasonal (MMA, 2007), the biome is not tion), and drought risk. Therefore, the Caatinga physically homogeneous and can be divided biome and the Brazilian semiarid region are into smaller ecoregions (Velloso et al., 2002). conceptually different, and hence have differ- In this landscape, mountain massifs reach ent areas and boundaries. elevations of over 2000 m above sea level March 2012] HERPETOLOGICA 33 FIG. 1.—(A) Topographic map with the anuran sampling locations included in the analysis: 1, Sa˜o Francisco River; 2, Jequitinhonha River. (B) Distribution map of the 48 quadrats (operational geographic units) considered for analysis within the limits of the Caatinga biome and semiarid region