DOCSLIB.ORG

The Regional Governance of Transport Policy in Wales: Towards Institutional Decongestion?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Regional Governance of Transport Policy in Wales: Towards Institutional Decongestion? The regional governance of transport policy in Wales: towards institutional decongestion? WISERD WORKING PAPER SERIES WISERD/WPS/006 Dr Ian Stafford October 2011 1 Author Dr Ian Stafford, Cardiff University Contact: Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods (WISERD) 46 Park Place Cardiff CF10 3BB Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)2920870325 WISERD Hub Contact: Cardiff University 46 Park Place Cardiff CF10 3BB Tel: 02920879338 Email: [email protected] 2 Abstract The introduction of the Railways Act 2005 and Transport (Wales) Act 2006 fundamentally reshaped the governance of transport policy within Wales. The two pieces of legislation conferred on the Welsh Assembly Government a number of key functions, including the statutory requirement to develop a Wales Transport Strategy and power to establish Joint Transport Authorities (JTAs) to ensure the delivery of national policy priorities at the regional and local levels. The latter measure was underpinned by the rationale that existing arrangements for the development and delivery of transport policy in Wales were overly complex and failed to deliver policy in a coordinated, ‘joined-up’ way. However, the move to JTAs was fiercely opposed by local authorities and the Welsh Local Government Association (WLGA) and intermediate arrangements were introduced which centred on the formalisation of previously voluntary Regional Transport Consortia in delivering Regional Transport Plans (RTPs). Question marks remain regarding the relative policy and decision- making capacity within the four Regional Transport Consortia and the extent to which these reforms have addressed or simply reinforced more complex and ‘congested governance’. The paper draws on an analysis of documentary data and semi- structured interviews with officials within the Welsh Assembly Government, Regional Transport Consortia and regional and local stakeholders to examine the policy and decision-making processes around the RTPs. It analyses the level of decision- making capacity within the four Regional Transport Consortia and the extent to which the arrangements introduced since 2006 have acted as a policy and institutional ‘decongestant’. 3 Introduction The introduction of devolution in 1999 has been characterised as leading to a fundamental ‘recalibration’ or ‘rescaling’ of territorial administration within the United Kingdom. This process of state ‘rescaling’ can be identified as part of a wider European trend which has led to the redistribution of responsibilities between multiple levels of governance, both upwards to supranational organisations, notably the European Union (EU), and downwards to regional and sub-national territories (Rodriguez-Pose and Gill, 2003; Lidström, 2007; Loughlin, 2007). Commentators have sought to capture this complex array of phenomena through the development of concepts, such as Multi-level Governance, which reflect the fragmentation of state power and authority across different levels of governance (Hooghe and Marks, 2001; Bache and Flinders, 2004). Haughton et al (2010: 10) identify a range of potential benefits and downsides that are commonly linked to the ‘rescaling’ of functions downwards to the sub-state or regional level. On the one hand, they argue devolution may deliver benefits through the tailoring of policies to local priorities and needs, promote policy innovation and stimulate greater accountability and openness in the policy-making process. On the other hand they note that devolution may actually engrain or exacerbate inequalities between territories, lead to inefficiencies in policy delivery and undermine existing territorial identities. Although the factors which shape the positive or negative effects of devolution are quite complex, it is clear that the introduction of devolution can be seen as having potentially far-reaching implications for the development and character of policy and the policy-making process. This vertical rescaling of the state is commonly linked to a horizontal reworking characterised by a shift from hierarchical systems of government towards more complex, networked forms of governance (Rhodes, 1997). This horizontal re-scaling has been characterised by Jessop as the ‘hollowing-out’ of the nation state by the combined processes of denationalisation, destatisation and internationalisation of policy regimes (Jessop, 1990, 2001). In response to these processes of ‘hollowing out’, Goodwin et al (2005, 2006) put forward the linked process of ‘filling in’. Processes of ‘filling in’ are characterised by ‘the sedimentation of new organisations, the reconfiguration of pre-existing organisations, the evolution of new relationships between different organisations, and the development of new working cultures’ (Jones et al , 2005; 357). Crucially the concept of ‘hollowing out’ is characterised as being limited to the national level where as the process of ‘filling in’ provides insights into contrasting and uneven processes of rescaling at the sub-national level. Haughton et al (2010, 11) argue that the linked processes of ‘hollowing out’ and ‘filling in’ can be understood as ‘not a simple redistribution of powers to other scales of government and governance, but 4 a change to the ways in which governments seek to pursue the their aims.’ In particular, they argue that in recent years there has been a growth of so-called ‘soft spaces’ which have developed outside of the formal and/or statutory mechanisms of policy-making or so-called ‘hard spaces’ (Haughton et al , 2010: 52). Haughton and Allmendinger (2007: 306) define ‘soft spaces’ as the ‘fluid areas between such formal processes where implementation through bargaining, flexibility, discretion and interpretation dominate.’ The growth of more complex, networked forms of governance and the emergence of new informal collaborative institutions and partnerships, highlighted in concepts such as ‘filling in’ and ‘soft spaces’, has led to some commentators to characterise the contemporary governance arrangements as the ‘congested state’ (Skelcher, 2000; Sullivan and Skelcher, 2002). The contested and constantly changing nature of these complex multi-level and multi-organisational relationships and networks has raised serious questions regarding the effective implementation and delivery of public services (Burfitt and Powell, 2008). The introduction of devolution has had a significant impact on the scales at which transport policy has been developed and delivered within the UK and has been characterised as part of the ‘filling in’ process highlighted above (Mackinnon et al , 2008). The complex character of transport has also meant that the appropriate spatial scale for the development and delivery of policy has been open to question (Marsden and May, 2006). Mackinnon et al (2008: 63) argue that the complexities of transport mean that different issues need to be addressed at different spatial scales, for example, tackling issues related to climate change are best suited to supranational agreements where as solutions to specific problems within communities are better addressed by the local or regional level. In both Scotland and Wales the devolved administrations have experimented with ‘nationally orchestrated regionalisation of transport governance’ aimed at delivering an integrated transport policy joining up the national, regional and local levels (Mackinnon et al , 2008). Within the Welsh context this process has centred on the formalisation of the previously voluntary Regional Transport Consortia and the provision of the statutory function for them to develop Regional Transport Plans (RTPs), published in draft in September 2009 (Sewta, 2009; Swwitch, 2009; TraCC, 2009; Taith, 2009). However, the impact of this evolving regional tier on the effective development and delivery of transport policy is open to question. For example, rather than providing a focus for the strategic integration of transport policy, this process of regionalisation could be characterised as simply adding to the ‘over-stuffed’ governance of transport policy within Wales (Pangbourne, 2007). Alternatively the Regional Transport Consortia may have acted as ‘institutional decongestants’, effectively countering the perceived negative effects of fragmentation within the policy area and promoting focused partnership and collaboration (Pemberton & Lloyd, 2008). 5 This paper analyses the regionalisation of transport policy in Wales in the post-devolved setting within the context of established debates around the dual processes of ‘hollowing out’ and ‘filling in’ and the development of fragmented, networked forms of governance. The analysis centres on two key research questions; i) to what extent have the Regional Transport Consortia had adequate policy and decision-making capacity to fulfil their functions and ii) the extent to which the consortia and RTP process has acted as a policy and institutional ‘decongestant’ or whether it has simply reinforced or exacerbated more complex and congested forms of governance. The paper draws on an analysis of documentary data and semi-structured interviews with officials within the Welsh Assembly Government, Regional Transport Consortia and regional and local stakeholders to examine the policy and decision-making processes around the RTPs. The paper is divided into three parts. Part one sets the context of transport policy in Wales and the rationale for the emergence of the consortia. Part two addresses the national context for the development of the RTPs and the role of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future Development of Transport for Wales
    National Assembly for Wales Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee The Future Development of Transport for Wales May 2019 www.assembly.wales The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales, agrees Welsh taxes and holds the Welsh Government to account. An electronic copy of this document can be found on the National Assembly website: www.assembly.wales/SeneddEIS Copies of this document can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 0300 200 6565 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @SeneddEIS © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2019 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. National Assembly for Wales Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee The Future Development of Transport for Wales May 2019 www.assembly.wales About the Committee The Committee was established on 28 June 2016. Its remit can be found at: www.assembly.wales/SeneddEIS Committee Chair: Russell George AM Welsh Conservatives Montgomeryshire Current Committee membership: Hefin David AM Vikki Howells AM Welsh Labour Welsh Labour Caerphilly Cynon Valley Mark Reckless AM David J Rowlands AM Welsh Conservative Group UKIP Wales South Wales East South Wales East Jack Sargeant AM Bethan Sayed AM Welsh Labour Plaid Cymru Alyn and Deeside South Wales West Joyce Watson AM Welsh Labour Mid and West Wales The Future Development of Transport for Wales Contents Chair’s foreword .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from Minister for Economy, Transport And
    Memorandum on the Economy and Transport Draft Budget Proposals for 2021-22 Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee – 20 January 2021 1.0 Introduction This paper provides information on the Economy & Transport (E&T) budget proposals as outlined in the 2021-22 Draft Budget published on 21 December 2020. It also provides an update on specific areas of interest to the Committee. 2.0 Strategic Context / Covid Impacts Aligned to Prosperity for All and the Well Being and Future Generations Act, the Economic Action Plan is the guiding policy and strategy document for all of Welsh Government’s activities. The 2021-22 plan builds on the considerable progress in implementing and embedding key elements of the plan, involving engagement with a range of stakeholders, particularly the business community and social partners. The pathway to Welsh economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic builds on the foundations of Prosperity for All: The Economic Action Plan. This shaped an economic development programme which invests in people and businesses - driving prosperity and reducing inequality across all of Wales. The mission builds on the early progress we have made in raising the profile and challenges in the Foundational Economy, recognising there is more to be done to spread and scale the approach. Other key initiatives, including Prosperity for All: A Low Carbon Wales, Cymraeg 2050, the Employability Delivery Plan and our Fair Work agenda, run through all interventions. The Well-being of Future Generations Act and its wider framework continue to provide a uniquely Welsh way of tackling the long-term challenges that our people and our planet face.
    [Show full text]
  • Llwybr Newydd a New Wales Transport Strategy
    Llwybr Newydd The Wales Transport Strategy 2021 Contents From the Ministers 3 5. Holding ourselves and our partners to account 47 Introduction 5 5.1 Transport performance 1. Vision 11 board 48 5.2 A new evaluation 2. Our priorities 13 framework 48 3. Well-being ambitions 22 5.3 Modal shift 48 Good for people and 5.4 Well-being measures 49 communities 23 5.5 Data on modes and sectors 50 Good for the environment 27 6. The five ways of Good for the economy working 48 and places in Wales 31 6.1 Involvement 52 Good for culture and the Welsh language 34 6.2 Collaboration 52 6.3 Prevention 52 4. How we will deliver 38 6.4 Integration 52 4.1 Investing responsibly 40 6.5 Long-term 52 4.2 Delivery and action plans 41 4.3 Cross-cutting delivery 7. Mini-plans 53 pathways 42 7.1 Active travel 56 4.4 Working in partnership 45 7.2 Bus 60 4.5 Updating our policies 7.3 Rail 64 and governance 46 7.4 Roads, streets and parking 68 4.6 Skills and capacity 46 7.5 Third sector 72 7.6 Taxis and private hire vehicles (PHV) 76 7.7 Freight and logistics 80 7.8 Ports and maritime 84 7.9 Aviation 88 Llwybr Newydd - The Wales Transport Strategy 2021 2 But we won’t achieve that level of physical and digital connectivity change unless we take people with to support access to more local Croeso us, listening to users and involving services, more home and remote from the Ministers people in designing a transport working.
    [Show full text]
  • BUS SERVICES (WALES) BILL Explanatory Memorandum
    BUS SERVICES (WALES) BILL Explanatory Memorandum incorporating the Regulatory Impact Assessment and Explanatory Notes March 2020 Bus Services (Wales) Bill Explanatory Memorandum to Bus Services (Wales) Bill This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by Department of Economy, Skills and Natural Resources of the Welsh Government and is laid before the National Assembly for Wales. Member’s Declaration In my view the provisions of the Bus Services (Wales) Bill, introduced by me on the 16 March 2020, would be within the legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales. Ken Skates AM Minister for Economy and Transport Assembly Member in charge of the Bill 16 March 2020 1 Contents page Part 1 – EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. Description 2. Legislative Competence 3. Purpose and intended effect of the legislation 4. Consultation 5. Power to make subordinate legislation PART 2 – REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6. Regulatory Impact Assessment summary 7. Options 8. Costs and benefits 9. Impact Assessments 10. Post implementation review ANNEX 1 – Explanatory Notes ANNEX 2 – Index of Standing Orders ANNEX 3 – Schedule of Amendments 2 PART 1 – EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. Chapter 1 – Description 1.1 The Bus Service (Wales) Bill will make changes to the legislative framework relating to the planning and delivery of local bus services in Wales. It will amend the existing legislative provision and provide local authorities with an improved range of tools to consider using when planning and delivering local bus services. The Bill will put in place new information sharing arrangements. 3 2. Chapter 2 – Legislative Competence 2.1 The National Assembly for Wales (‘the Assembly") has the legislative competence to make the provisions in the Bus Services (Wales) Bill (“the Bill”) pursuant to Part 4 of the Government of Wales Act 2006 ("GoWA 2006") as amended by the Wales Act 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cardiff City Capital Region
    Public Document Pack 1 Regional Transport Authority - 5th March 2019 at 10.30am. Council Chamber, Bridgend County Borough Council. This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 CCRTA Meeting 05th March 2019 10.30am at the Council Chamber, Bridgend County Borough Council AGENDA Item Agenda Item No. 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Transport for Wales – Update and Overview – Geoff Ogden 4. Welsh Government / Transport for Wales – Bus Strategy Update – Ben Hutchison and Tony Meacham 5. Improving Transport – White Paper - CCRTA Response 6. Metro Plus Report Close and date of next meeting:- Page 1 This page is intentionally left blank Page 2 Cyfarfod ATPRC 05 Mawrth 2019 10.30am yn Siambr y Cyngor, Cyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol Pen-y-bont AGENDA Rhif Eitem ar yr Agenda yr Eitem 1. Croeso a chyflwyniadau 2. Datganiadau o ddiddordeb 3. Trafnidiaeth i Gymru – Diweddariad a Throsolwg – Geoff Ogden 4. Llywodraeth Cymru – Trafnidiaeth i Gymru – Diweddariad ar y Strategaeth Bws – Ben Hutchison a Tony Meacham 5. Gwella Trafnidiaeth – Papur Gwyn – Ymateb ATPRC 6. Adroddiad Metro Plus Cau a dyddiad y cyfarfod nesaf:- Page 3 This page is intentionally left blank Page 4 CARDIFF CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MEETING 5th MARCH 2019 TITLE: WHITE PAPER – IMPROVING PUBLIC TRANSPORT – CCRTA CONSULTATION RESPONSE REPORT OF CARDIFF CAPITAL REGION CHAIR OF REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY COUNCILLOR HUW DAVID AGENDA ITEM: Reason for this Report 1. To update Members on the White Paper –‘Improving Public Transport’, issued by Welsh Government (WG) for consultation. 2. To offer Members a draft response to the consultation (included at Appendix A), in respect of the questions that WG have asked in relation to legislative proposals identified within the White Paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2004-05
    Waterway Map ADDRESSES British Waterways WATERWAYS BRITISH Willow Grange Church Road Watford WD17 4QA T +44 1923 201120 Head Office Customer Service Centre F +44 1923 201400 Willow Grange, Church Road, Willow Grange, Church Road, E [email protected] Watford WD17 4QA Watford WD17 4QA www.britishwaterways.co.uk T: 01923 226422 T 01923 201120 Discover the best of the UK’s waterside ANNUAL REPORT & F 01923 201304 with Waterscape.com [email protected] ISBN 0 903218 48 8 This document is printed on Greencoat Velvet Plus and Cyclus Offset. Greencoat is 80% recycled, 20% pulp from sustainable sources and Design by 55 Design Ltd has been awarded the NAPM and Eugropa recycled marks. 2004 05 Printed by Greenshires Group Cyclus Offset is 100% de-inked post consumer recycled waste / and has been awarded the NAPM. The document has been printed July 2005 using soya based inks. ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS BW Scotland Northern Waterways Southern Waterways 2004/05 ACCOUNTS Canal House, Middle Warehouse, Castle Quay, Canal Lane, Hatton, Applecross Street, Manchester M15 4NJ Warwick CV35 7JL Glasgow G4 9SP T 0161 838 5580 T 01926 626100 T 0141 332 6936 F 0161 838 5590 F 01926 626101 F 0141 331 1688 enquiries.scotland@ North West Waterways Central Shires Waterways britishwaterways.co.uk Trafalgar House, Temple Court, Peel’s Wharf, Lichfield Street, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 6GD Fazeley, Tamworth B78 3QZ BW London T 01925 847700 T 01827 252000 1 Sheldon Square, F 01925 847710 F 01827 288071 Paddington Central, enquiries.northwest@
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Issues in Wales: a Research Review
    Research report: 11 Equality issues in Wales: a research review Victoria Winckler (editor) The Bevan Foundation Equality issues in Wales: a research review Victoria Winckler (editor) The Bevan Foundation © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2009 First published Spring 2009 ISBN 978 1 84206 089 6 Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other Equality and Human Rights Commission’s research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com/researchreports If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] CONTENTS Page CHAPTER AUTHORS i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 This Report 1 1.2 Demography of Wales 2 1.3 Governance of Wales 12 1.4 Devolution and Equality 13 1.5 Conclusion 17 2. POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 18 2.1 Policy Context 18 2.2 Household Income and Poverty 19 2.3 Benefits and Pensions 28 2.4 Savings, Credit and Debt, and Financial Exclusion 31 2.5 Water and Fuel Poverty 35 2.6 Digital Inclusion 37 2.7 Culture, Leisure and Sport 38 2.8 Access to Advice, Support and Justice 42 2.9 Transport 44 2.10 Conclusions and Research Gaps 51 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Wales Transport Strategy Bevan Foundation Consultation Response
    A New Wales Transport Strategy Bevan Foundation Consultation Response The Bevan Foundation is -tank. We aim to end poverty and inequality by working with people to find effective solutions and by inspiring governments, organisations and communities to take action. We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the its new transport Our extensive work on poverty and inequality provides us with some insights into the difficulties faced by those living in low income households, including accessing affordable transport. Our response draws on this experience. Given the large number of questions in the consultation document we have grouped some together and our response is set out in 5 sections bellow. 1. The 20 year ambition and the long term vision The Bevan Foundation broadly agrees with the long term vision and the 20 year ambition set out in the Llwybr Newydd Strategy. In particular we welcome the ambition to develop a transport system where 1 We are concerned however, that there is little set out by means of how this ambition would be achieved for people trapped in poverty beyond the Welsh Government committing to ontinue to support concessionary and discounted travel for the people 2 The Bevan Foundation has highlighted a number of concerns with the current approach to concessionary and discounted travel over recent years. In the first instance concessionary services are not targeted at those most in need of support. Pensioners are the age group least likely to live in poverty in Wales. 19% of pensioners live in poverty, a proportion that is still too high and is rising, but which is less than the proportion of working age adults living in poverty, 22%, and significantly less than the proportion of children living in poverty which stands at 28%.3 This means that whilst there are thousands of over 60s benefitting from free bus travel who are not in poverty, there may be thousands of working age adults trapped in poverty who do not get access to the same support.
    [Show full text]
  • East-West Or North-South? Strategic Priorities for a Welsh Transport Infrastructure Andrew Minnis
    East-west or north-south? Strategic priorities for a Welsh transport infrastructure Andrew Minnis The economic and social importance of transport in Wales is widely accepted. However, should the priority be east-west links with England and beyond, or should a balance be struck with improved connections between north and south? Key Welsh transport links The Welsh transport network is a product of The economic and social impact of geography and history. A mountainous centre, transport the location of coalfields, and the importance of According to the 2006 Eddington Report, the economic connections to English industrial economic benefits arising from transport centres has concentrated population and include: industry on the north and south coasts of Wales. economic growth through increased production / consumption of goods and The busiest transport corridors in Wales are the services, and improved productivity; east-west routes of coastal north and south an improved response to structural Wales which form part of the strategic trans- economic change; and European transport network. Trunk road and rail improved quality of life through, for links join the port of Holyhead to Manchester example, availability of leisure time. and Liverpool, while the south western ports are linked to the cities of south Wales, southern More recently the role of transport in tackling England and, ultimately, Europe. Welsh social exclusion has been acknowledged. The 2008 Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation identified Powys, Ceredigion, Pembrokeshire, East-west road and rail links also join Carmarthenshire, Gwynedd and Monmouthshire Aberystwyth to the English midlands, while the as the most deprived local authorities in Wales in Heart of Wales line connects Swansea with terms of access to services.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Response IPT31. Professor Stuart
    Inquiry into Enterprise and Business IPT31. Inquiry into Integrated Public Transport Evidence from Professor Stuart Cole CBE, Wales Transport Research Centre, University of Glamorgan NAfW IntegPublicTrans brief Oct 2012 v5 CYNULLIAD CENEDLAETHOL CYMRU PWLLGOR MENTER A BUSNES YMCHWILIAD I DRAFNIDIAETH GYHOEDDUS INTEGREDIG TACHWEDD 2012 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES ENTERPRISE AND BUSINESS COMMITTEE INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT INQUIRY NOVEMBER 2012 Papur Ymgynghorol gan Yr Athro Stuart Cole CBE, Athro Emeritus mewn Trafnidiaeth, Canolfan Ymchwil Trafnidiaeth Cymru, Prifysgol Cymru Briefing paper by Professor Stuart Cole CBE, Emeritus Professor of Transport, Wales Transport Research Centre, University of Glamorgan OVERVIEW This paper responds to the primary issues raised by the Committee in its call for evidence. Each of the key issues is covered in turn. But first, the extent of the evidence is outlined. There has been considerable discussion about an integrated transport policy; but what does it mean and what does it have to integrate? Logistics and supply chain management facilitates operational freight integration to achieve commercial objectives and the most efficient means of moving good There is no similar framework on the passenger side where there exists four policy and operational aspects to integrate (although only (1) and (2) concern this call for evidence: 1. Integration within and between different types of transport - better and easier interchange between car/bus/rail etc. with better information on services and availability of integrated tickets. The same applies between public and private transport, between motorised and non-motorised (walking, cycling) transport and within public transport 2. Integration with land use planning - to reduce the need for travel and to ensure new developments can be reached by public transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Policy in 2010: a Rough Guide RESEARCH PAPER 10/28 19 March 2010
    Transport policy in 2010: a rough guide RESEARCH PAPER 10/28 19 March 2010 This paper is intended to provide an introduction to and an overview of transport policy in the UK in 2010, including: • Who makes transport policy nationally, internationally and at the devolved and local levels? • How is policy made? • How much is spent on transport and how is that money raised? • What are the main challenges in transport policy in 2010? • What are the main political parties’ transport policies? Louise Butcher Fintan Codd Rachael Harker Recent Research Papers 10/13 Unemployment by Constituency, January 2010 17.02.10 10/14 Energy Bill: Committee Stage Report 17.02.10 10/15 Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants Etc.) Bill: 22.02.10 Committee Stage Report 10/16 Sustainable Communities Act 2007 (Amendment) Bill [Bill 21 24.02.10 of 2009-10] 10/17 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill [Bill 17 of 2009-10] 25.02.10 10/18 Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill: Committee Stage 26.02.10 Report 10/19 Bribery Bill [HL] [Bill 69 of 2009-10] 01.03.10 10/20 Economic Indicators, March 2010 02.03.10 10/21 Grocery Market Ombudsman Bill [Bill 18 of 2009-10] 02.03.10 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee 08.03.10 Stage Report 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 Research Paper 10/28 Contributing Authors: Louise Butcher, Transport Policy, Business and Transport Fintan Codd, Transport Resources, Business and Transport Rachael Harker, Transport Statistics, Social and General Statistics This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Title
    Wales & Borders Overview of W&B and the South Wales Metro trc.llyw.cymru tfw.gov.wales @transport_wales Overview —Transport for Wales (TfW) —Wales and Borders Rail Service and South Wales Metro All images shown are for illustrative purposes only Our Purpose To keep Wales moving by delivering customer-focused services, expert advice and infrastructure investment. What is Transport for Wales? — A not-for-profit, customer-focused company, wholly owned by the Welsh Government — Helping to drive a step change in how we understand, plan, use and invest in transport in Wales — A pan-Wales organisation applying local understanding for the benefit of customers — An expert adviser to the Welsh Government and an advocate for transport-related matters Our Relationship with the Welsh Government — The Welsh Government develops policies for transport in Wales — Transport for Wales provides technical advice and expertise to help the Welsh Government to develop policy — Transport for Wales is an expert delivery organisation for the Welsh Government — Everything Transport for Wales does supports Welsh Government policies Our Strategic Goals — Improved customer service across — Ensuring that communities are transport services in Wales properly connected — Fully integrated/joined-up transport — Transport modelling and land-use with integrated ticketing quite difficult planning with the current deregulated bus market — Improving air quality and — Reinvesting operational surpluses in decarbonising our transport networks transport — Working with the Welsh Government
    [Show full text]