DOCSLIB.ORG

City of New York 2012-2013 Districting Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of New York 2012-2013 Districting Commission SUBMISSION UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT (42 U.S.C. § 1973c) CITY OF NEW YORK 2012-2013 DISTRICTING COMMISSION Submission for Preclearance of the Final Districting Plan for the Council of the City of New York Plan Adopted by the Commission: February 6, 2013 Plan Filed with the City Clerk: March 4, 2013 Dated: March 22, 2013 EXPEDITED PRECLEARANCE REQUESTED TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 II. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION (28 C.F.R. § 51.34) ................................................. 3 III. THE NEW YORK CITY COUNCIL.............................................................................. 4 IV. THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICTING COMMISSION ......................................... 4 A. Districting Commission Members ....................................................................... 4 B. Commissioner Training ........................................................................................ 5 C. Public Meetings ..................................................................................................... 6 V. DISTRICTING PROCESS PER CITY CHARTER ..................................................... 7 A. Schedule ................................................................................................................. 7 B. Criteria ................................................................................................................... 8 VI. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION ...................................................... 9 A. Website and Social Media .................................................................................. 10 B. Speakers’ Bureau and Outreach to Community Boards ................................ 11 C. Online Mapping for Members of the Public .................................................... 12 D. Resource Room (Public Access Terminals) ...................................................... 13 E. Advertisements and Mailings............................................................................. 13 F. Press Coverage .................................................................................................... 15 G. Comments/Communications from Third Parties Received by Commission . 15 H. Public Hearings ................................................................................................... 16 i. First Round .............................................................................................. 17 ii. Second Round .......................................................................................... 18 iii. Third Round ............................................................................................ 19 VII. DATABASE DESIGN .................................................................................................... 19 A. The 2000 Census .................................................................................................. 22 B. The 2010 Census .................................................................................................. 23 i. Demographic Changes in New York County ....................................... 23 ii. Demographic Changes in Bronx County .............................................. 24 iii. Demographic Changes in Kings County ............................................... 24 iv. Demographic Changes in Queens County ............................................ 24 v. Demographic Changes in Richmond County ....................................... 24 VIII. DISTRICTING PLANS ................................................................................................. 25 A. Overview .............................................................................................................. 25 B. Preliminary Draft Plan ....................................................................................... 25 C. November 15th Plan ............................................................................................. 27 D. December 4th Plan ............................................................................................... 28 E. Final Districting Plan .......................................................................................... 28 i. New York County ................................................................................... 29 ii. Bronx County .......................................................................................... 30 iii. Kings County ........................................................................................... 31 IX. FINAL PLAN ADOPTION ............................................................................................ 32 A. Board of Elections Letter and Response ........................................................... 33 B. Public Notice of this Submission ........................................................................ 33 X. SECTION 5 PRECLEARANCE SUBMISSION ......................................................... 33 A. Covered Jurisdictions ......................................................................................... 33 i. New York County ................................................................................... 34 ii. Bronx County .......................................................................................... 34 iii. Kings County ........................................................................................... 35 B. Benchmark Plan .................................................................................................. 35 C. Standard of Review ............................................................................................. 36 D. Section 5 Analysis ................................................................................................ 37 i. Majority Black Districts ......................................................................... 39 ii. Majority Hispanic Districts .................................................................... 58 iii. Multiethnic Districts ............................................................................... 77 XI. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 85 XII. EXHIBIT LIST ............................................................................................................... 86 APPENDIX 1: Dr. Lisa Handley, A Voting Rights Act Evaluation of the 2013 New York City Council Redistricting Plan APPENDIX 2: Submission Tables - Unadjusted Census Data Page i of xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section 5 Preclearance Submission (28 C.F.R. Part 51) I. Required Contents (28 C.F.R. § 51.27): a. A copy of any ordinance, enactment, order, or regulation embodying the change affecting voting for which section 5 preclearance is being requested. The 2013 final plan for the Districts of the Council of the City of New York (the “final districting plan”) of the City of New York 2012-2013 Districting Commission (the “Districting Commission”) for the fifty-one districts of the Council of the City of New York (the “City Council”) is annexed to this submission. (Exhibit 1a.) b. A copy of any ordinance, enactment, order, or regulation embodying the voting standard, practice, or procedure that is proposed to be repealed, amended, or otherwise changed. The 2003 precleared final districting plan for the City Council is annexed to this submission. (Exhibit 2a.) c. A statement that identifies with specificity each change affecting voting for which section 5 preclearance is being requested and that explains the difference between the submitted change and the prior law or practice. The changes affecting voting are set forth in Section X, infra, of this submission. d. The name, title, mailing address, and telephone number of the person making the submission. Where available a telefacsimile number and an email address for the person making the submission also should be provided. This submission is being made for the the City of New York 2012-2013 Districting Commission by: Thaddeus Hackworth, Esq. General Counsel New York City 2012-2013 Districting Commission 253 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10007 tel: (212) 788-9689 mobile: (917) 618-1819 fax: (212) 788-9470 email: [email protected] Page ii of xi e. The name of the submitting authority and the name of the jurisdiction responsible for the change, if different. The name of the submitting authority and the name of the jurisdiction responsible for the change is the same as those set forth in paragraphs (d) and (g). f. If the submission is not from a State or county, the name of the county and State in which the submitting authority is located. The City of New York is comprised of New York County, Bronx County, Queens County, Kings County, and Richmond County, in the State of New York. g. Identification of the person or body responsible for making the change and the mode of decision (e.g., act of State legislature, ordinance of city council, administrative decision by registrar). The body responsible for making the change is the New York City 2012-2013 Districting Commission, a 15-member commission appointed pursuant to Chapter 2A of the New York City Charter. Benito Romano, Chair Carl Hum, Executive Director 253 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10007 (212) 442-6940 h. A statement identifying the statutory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New York City, NY
    REACHING FOR ZERO: The Citizens Plan for Zero Waste in New York City A “Working Document” 1st Version By Resa Dimino and Barbara Warren New York City Zero Waste Campaign and Consumer Policy Institute / Consumers Union June 2004 Consumer Policy Institute New York City Zero Waste Campaign Consumers Union c/o NY Lawyers for the Public Interest 101 Truman Ave. 151 West 30th Street, 11th Floor Yonkers, NY 10703-1057 New York, New York 10001 914-378-2455 212-244-4664 The New York City Zero Waste Campaign was first conceived at the 2nd National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit in October of 2002, where City activists were confronted with the ongoing concerns of other Environmental Justice communities that would continue to be burdened with the high volume of waste being exported from NYC. As a result of discussion with various activists in the City and elsewhere, a diverse group of environmental, social justice and neighborhood organizations came together to begin the process of planning for Zero Waste in NYC. A series of principles were initially drafted to serve as a basis for the entire plan. It is the Campaign’s intent to expand discussions about the Zero Waste goal and to gain broad support for the detailed plan. The Consumer Policy Institute is a division of Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports magazine. The Institute was established to do research and education on environmental quality, public health and economic justice and other issues of concern to consumers. The Consumer Policy Institute is funded by foundation grants, government contracts, individual donations, and by Consumers Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Buddy CASSETTE DION ELVIS GUITAR IPOD PHONOGRAPH RADIO RECORD RHYTHM ROCK ROLL Where The
    Rhythm, Blues and Clues I V J X F Y R D L Y W D U N H Searchin Michael Presser, Executive Director A Q X R O C K F V K K P D O P Help the musical note find it’s home B L U E S B Y X X F S F G I A Presents… Y C L C N T K F L V V E A D R Y A K O A Z T V E I O D O A G E S W R R T H K J P U P T R O U S I D H S O N W G I I U G N Z E G V A Y V F F F U E N G O P T V N L O T S C G X U Q E H L T G H B E R H O J H D N L P N E C S U W Q B M D W S G Y M Z O B P M R O Y F D G S R W K O F D A X E J X L B M O W Z K B P I D R V X T C B Y W P K P F Y K R Q R E Q F V L T L S G ALBUM BLUES BROADWAY Study Buddy CASSETTE DION ELVIS GUITAR IPOD PHONOGRAPH RADIO RECORD RHYTHM ROCK ROLL Where the 630 Ninth Avenue, Suite 802 Our Mission: Music Inside Broadway is a professional New York City based children’s theatre New York, NY 10036 12 company committed to producing Broadway’s classic musicals in a Music Lives Telephone: 212-245-0710 contemporary light for young audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Times NEW YORK CITY POLL
    For paper of Oct. 28 The New York Times NEW YORK CITY POLL Oct. 21-26, 2005 Total N = 993 Registered N = 758 Likely voters N = 616 Results are based on the total citywide sample unless otherwise noted. An asterisk indicates registered respondents. TRENDS ARE BASED NEW YORK TIMES POLLS, EXCEPT: NEW YORK TIMES/CBS NEWS POLLS: OCT. 1998 - OCT. 2000, OCT. 6-9, 2001, JUNE AND AUG. 2002, AND JULY 2003; NEW YORK TIMES/WCBS NEWS POLLS: APRIL 1985 - JUNE 1990, MAY 1993 - OCT. 1994. 1. What's your long range view for the city -- do you think that ten or fifteen years from now, New York City will be a better place to live than it is now, a worse place, or about the same? Better Worse Same Better & worse DK/NA 11/731 38 32 26 4 8/77 27 42 18 13 12/77 38 34 17 11 12/7-14/81 30 40 22 7 1/5-10/85 30 31 27 5 6 1/4-6/87 26 35 31 4 5 1/10-12/88 24 42 28 6 6/11-17/89 22 48 24 1 5 6/17-10/90 20 51 24 4 11/2-12/91 19 58 17 5 5/10-14/93 22 50 23 - 5 3/1-6/97 28 36 29 1 6 8/5-12/01 34 25 32 1 9 10/6-9/01 54 11 26 1 8 10/27-11/1/01 51 12 26 2 9 6/4-9/02 41 20 31 1 6 8/25-29/02 33 23 38 1 6 1/11-15/03 34 26 32 2 7 6/6-11/03 30 33 29 1 7 8/31-9/4/03 34 31 26 1 8 4/16-21/04 33 28 32 2 6 8/20-25/04 30 32 30 1 6 2/4-13/05 28 29 36 3 4 6/21-26/05 31 29 33 2 5 8/22-28/05 30 26 37 1 5 10/21-26/05 36 24 34 1 5 1 Some people are registered to vote and others are not.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Rights in New York City: 1982–2006
    VOTING RIGHTS IN NEW YORK CITY: 1982–2006 JUAN CARTAGENA* I. INTRODUCTION TO THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT At the time of the 1982 amendments to the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the continuation of Section 5 coverage to three counties in New York City, the city was at a major crossroads regarding faithful compliance with the mandates of the Act. Just one year earlier in the largest city in the United States, the largest municipal election apparatus in the country was brought to a screeching halt when the federal courts enjoined the Septem- ber mayoral primaries—two days before Election Day—because the city failed to obtain preclearance of new (and discriminatory) city council lines and election district changes.1 The cost of closing down the election was enormous, and a lesson was painfully learned: minority voters knew how to get back to court, the courts would not stand by idly in the face of obvious Section 5 noncompliance and business-as-usual politics would no longer be the same. Weeks later, the Department of Justice (DOJ) would not only of- ficially deny preclearance to the city council plan, but would find that its egregious disregard of the burgeoning African-American and Latino voting strength in the city had a discriminatory purpose and a discriminatory ef- fect.2 In this context, the 1982 extension of Section 5 to parts of New York City should not have seemed so anomalous to a country that continued to * General Counsel, Community Service Society. Esmeralda Simmons of the Center for Law and Social Justice, Medgar Evers College, Margaret Fung of the Asian American Legal Defense and Educa- tion Fund, Jon Greenbaum of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and Debo Adegbile of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund assisted in editing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Charter School Growth and Sustainability in Harlem
    REGIMES, REFORM, AND RACE: THE POLITICS OF CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY IN HARLEM by Basil A. Smikle Jr. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Basil A. Smikle Jr. All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT REGIMES, REFORM, AND RACE: THE POLITICS OF CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY IN HARLEM By Basil A. Smikle Jr. The complex and thorny relationship betWeen school-district leaders, sub-city political and community figures and teachers’ unions on the subject of charter schools- an interaction fraught with racially charged language and tactics steeped in civil rights-era mobilization - elicits skepticism about the motives of education reformers and their vieW of minority populations. In this study I unpack the local politics around tacit and overt racial appeals in support of NeW York City charter schools with particular attention to Harlem, NeW York and periods when the sustainability of these schools, and long-term education reforms, were endangered by changes in the political and legislative landscape. This dissertation ansWers tWo key questions: How did the Bloomberg-era governing coalition and charter advocates in NeW York City use their political influence and resources to expand and sustain charter schools as a sector; and how does a community with strong historic and cultural narratives around race, education and political activism, respond to attempts to enshrine externally organized school reforms? To ansWer these questions, I employ a case study analysis and rely on Regime Theory to tell the story of the Mayoral administration of Michael Bloomberg and the cadre of charter leaders, philanthropies and wealthy donors whose collective activity created a climate for growth of the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Cunymatters LG 3/04
    SpecialLEGISLATIVE Edition cuny.edu/news • C ITY U NIVERSITY OF N EW Y ORK FOUNDED 1847 • Spring 2004 SPOTLIGHT on ALUMNI Legislators New Program Offers Politics 101 any CUNY tephanie Rosario is intrigued by alumni serve in what makes politics tick. There is, the state legisla- Sshe says, the fascination of give and M take, the back and forth of things, the ture. Here are some stories "manner in which individuals reach out to about them and about the their representatives and subsequently University's commitment these representatives can discuss and lobby for their concerns on everything from to training leaders. health and safety to justice and equality." The Brooklyn College student, who is “Two-fer” Legislators majoring in political science and minoring in sociology, is learning about the under- Take a Second Helping pinnings of politics first-hand by working 1of CUNY Learning in the office of Assemblymember Felix Senator Seymour Ortiz of Brooklyn, thanks to the Black, Puerto Rican & Hispanic Legislative Lachman has a Three CUNY students who'll be working as interns in legislators' district offices are, from left, Caucus/CUNY Scholars Program, which long relationship Andre Harding (Queens College), Stephanie Rosario (Brooklyn College) and Kathlene Burke awards high-achieving students internships (Baruch College). with two CUNY with members of the New York State colleges. Many of Legislature. Rosario, who wants to become his colleagues in a public-interest attorney or a law clerk for Caucus/CUNY Scholars Program are: but as yet I do not know whether I want to Albany have stud- a federal judge, says that the CUNY Senate Minority Leader David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote Ferrer for Mayor November 8Th
    Vote Ferrer For Mayor November 8th The Organization of Staff Analysts’ leadership endorsed Fernando Ferrer for Mayor months ago. I have known Freddy since before he held any office at all. As he progressed from legislative assistant to District Leader to City Council member and Borough President, Fred was consistently a friend of the working men and women of the City of New York. He was accessible, informed, considerate and effective. Freddy was especially of value to the Civil Service. His opponent gives him no credit for the turning around of the Bronx. Those of us who came from the Bronx in the 70's and 80's remember the arson that was wiping out housing wholesale. “The Bronx is burning” was proclaimed by national commentators and neither Freddy’s predecessor nor the Mayor had an answer. The answer, put forward and supported by Bronx Borough President Fernando Ferrer, was to increase the number of Fire Marshals, a civil service specialty of firefighters trained to detect and investigate arson. The arsonists were caught and convicted. The burning of the Bronx to cash in on fire insurance ended. Our current Mayor builds stadiums. Freddy saved affordable housing. [continues, over] Fred Ferrer managed budgets both as a Council leader and as a Borough President. His opponent also has managed a budget. When there was a cash shortfall in a bad year, Freddy worked out job sharing and voluntary furloughs. When our current Mayor claimed hardship, he laid off thirty analysts and three thousand other employees. There was no need for those layoffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture P5 Bites P14 Blues P3 SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM the MTA SMALL BUSINESS MENTORING PROGRAM | the MTA SMALL BUSINESS FEDERAL PROGRAM
    OCTOBER 03 - OCTOBER 09, 2018 • VOL. 19 • No. 40 WASHINGTON HEIGHTS • INWOOD • HARLEM • EAST HARLEM NORTHERN MANHATTAN’S BILINGUAL NEWSPAPER EL PERIODICO BILINGUE DEL NORTE DE MANHATTAN NOW EVERY WEDNESDAY TODOS LOS MIERCOLES Culture p5 Bites p14 Blues p3 SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM THE MTA SMALL BUSINESS MENTORING PROGRAM | THE MTA SMALL BUSINESS FEDERAL PROGRAM CALLING ALL SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESSES (SDVOBs) ARE YOU READY TO GROW YOUR BUSINESS? Joe Lhota Chairman PRIME CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS UP TO $3 MILLION I SMALL BUSINESS LOANS UP TO $900,000 Honorable Fernando Ferrer Vice Chairman Patrick Foye President If you’re a certified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Businesses (SDVOBs) construction contractor who wants to bid on New York’s lucrative transportation construction contracts, join the elite team at the MTA. Enroll in the award-winning MTA Small Business Development Program, which includes the MTA Small Business Mentoring Program and the MTA Small Business Federal Program. Contracts - Prime Construction Bidding Opportunities up to $3 Million Access to Capital - Small Business Loans up to $900,000 Per Contract Bonding - Access to Surety Bonding Assistance Veronique Hakim Training - Free Classroom Construction Training Managing Director Technical Assistance - MTA Expert Technical Assistance Mentoring - One-on-One Professional Development Free Business Plan Development Back Office Support WHO CAN APPLY NEXT STEPS SDVOBs Visit web.mta.info/sbdp to select the Michael J. Garner, MBA Chief Diversity Officer NYS MWBEs program in which you are interested in and DBEs download the application. You can also call Small Businesses 212.878.7161 for more information. DIVERSITY COMMITTEE MEMBERS Honorable David Jones Honorable Susan G.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E2432 HON
    E2432 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks November 18, 2005 1912, it was unfairly divided so that only half the Pacific and participated in the Battle of IN RECOGNITION OF NEW YORK of the seven million Albanians who live in Leyte Gulf in the Philippines. In one engage- CITY COUNCIL SPEAKER GIF- the Balkans today live in the State of Alba- FORD MILLER nia, with the other half living on her borders ment, the Battle of Surigao Strait, the USS in five other jurisdictions. The State of Melvin fired a torpedo that hit the Japanese Yugoslavia was created after World War I on battleship Fuso, splitting it in half and eventu- HON. CAROLYN B. MALONEY the backs of the Albanian people and on ally sinking it. According to historical reports, OF NEW YORK their land. Then Communism again sub- the USS Melvin was the only destroyer to sink IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES merged the Albanian people—this time a battleship in World War II. For his heroism throwing them into a political and economic Friday, November 18, 2005 ‘‘black hole,’’ stretching from Belgrade to and leadership aboard the USS Melvin, Admi- Mrs. MALONEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise to pay Tirana, for almost fifty years after World ral Atkins was awarded the Navy Cross. In tribute to Gifford Miller, Speaker of the New War II. It is a wonder that the Albanian peo- 1959, Admiral Atkins retired after 27 years of York City Council. Speaker Miller led the ple kept their language, their history, and faithful service to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 27530 Hon. Sam Farr Hon. Carolyn B. Maloney Hon
    27530 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS November 18, 2005 leadership and unwavering courage aboard Speaker Miller began his political career in Gifford Miller is an extraordinarily talented the USS Melvin. I hope that you will join me my office. He rose quickly from an entry level and hard-working public servant. Although in honoring the life and service of Admiral position in my Washington office to running term limits are bringing an end to his Speaker- Barry K. Atkins and offering our most sincere my New York district office. From the begin- ship, I am hopeful that he will remain active in condolences to his family and friends. ning his talents were obvious. He was hard- public life. New York city needs him. f working and dedicated, drafting legislation to Mr. Speaker, I request that my colleagues fund the development of pocket parks in urban join me in paying tribute to Speaker Gifford IN HONOR OF KEITH SHAFFER areas and other matters. Recognizing his abili- Miller, a remarkable public servant and com- ties, I soon promoted him to run my district of- munity leader. HON. SAM FARR fice. f OF CALIFORNIA As Chief of Staff in my New York office, he IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES established himself as a knowledgeable, com- STATEMENT IN HONOR OF CURTIS MCCLAIN Friday, November 18, 2005 mitted leader in the community. Most of all, Speaker Miller clearly loves New York City, Mr. FARR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to and wants to make this the best possible honor the life and legacy of Keith Shaffer, an HON.
    [Show full text]
  • Baychester Community Center Grand Opening!
    Vol. 33, No. 2 First Class U.S. Postage Paid — Permit No. 4119, New York, N.Y. 10007 February 2003 BAYCHESTER COMMUNITY CENTER GRAND OPENING! By Allan Leicht he Baychester Community Center was officially inau- Tgurated on January 14, 2003 as New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) Chairman Tino Hernandez cut the ribbon at the entrance to a new building that promises to endure as a landmark of the Bronx, indeed of New York. It is a structure of noble simplici- ty, which also houses the Bay- Eden Senior Center, and which came into being as a result of the persistence of NYCHA’s resident leadership and the collaborative financing of NYCHA, the New York City Council and the Depart- ment for the Aging. Joining Mr. Hernandez were former City Council Member Lawrence Warden, who represent- ed Bronx District 12, including Baychester, and who was instru- mental in the appropriation of over $2 million in City Council funds for the project; and current City Council Member for the dis- trict, Larry Seabrook. The overall cost of the new 15,500-square- foot facility was $9.6 million. Designed in its entirety by the Housing Authority’s Department The U.S. Department of Housing of Design and Capital Improve- BRAVING THE COLD (left to right) NYCHA Board Member JoAn- and Urban Development (HUD) ment, the brick and glass structure na Aniello, General Manager Douglas Apple, Vice-Chairman is appropriately down-to-earth Earl Andrews, Jr., Chairman Tino Hernandez, State Assembly- and well suited to its site on West man Carl E.
    [Show full text]