Zn4 C'haptcr VIII. Xlaintenancu Zimbabwe Nution& Prwess
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
zn4 C‘hAptcr VIII. Xlaintenancu of in(trnatiooal peace and security 3. Co//s upon the administering Power IO ensure the full and developments in Southern Rhodesia, but that his dclcga- impartial imp(emcn~ation of the letter and spirit of the Lancaster tion had trust in the ability of the United Kingdom to House agreement; implement the London agreement impartially.l*‘~ 4. Calls upon the Governmenl of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. while noting its announcement that the THE SITUATION IN SOUTH AFRICA: KILLINGS ANI) VIO- South Afriun troopa have ken withdrawn from the Beit Bridge. to ensure Ihe immbdi;tc, complete and uncondilional withdrawal of any LENCE BY THE AfARTHEfD RctilME IN SOWET AND OTHER AREAS other South African forces, repular or mercenary. from Southern Rhodesia: 5 Co/is upon the Government of the United Kingdom lo take all Decision of 19 June 1976 (1930th meeting): rc.wIulion nary steps in order to cnsutc that eligible Zimbabwe nution& 392 (1976) WIII freely participele in the forthcoming elccloral prwess. indudin8. By lettcr’*‘4 dated I8 June 1976 addressed to the (0) The speedy and unimpcdcd return of Zimbabwe erilcs and President of the Security Council, the rcpreaentutivcs of refqces in conformily with Ihe Lancaslcr House a8reemcnl; Benin, the Libyan Arab Republic and the United (b) The rclusc of all political prisoners; Republic of Tanzania. in accordance with the decision (c) The strict compliance by all the forces with the terms of Ihe of the African Group, requested an emergency meeting Lancaster House l srccmcnl and the confinement forthwith of the Rhode&an and auxiliary forces IO their bases in conformity with the! of the Security Council to consider the measures of agreement; repression, including wanton killings, perpetrated by the (d) The according of cqual treatment to all pprtics lo Ihe apartheid rtgime in South Africa against the African agreement; people in Sowcto and other areas in South Africa. (c) The rescinding of all emcrlcncy musura and rcplations tclegram~~~5 inconsistent with the conduct of free and fair elections; By dated 18 June 1976 addressed to the Secretary-General, the President of Madagascar, in 6. Culls upon the Government of the United Kingdom lo create conditions in Southern Rhoduia which will ensure free and fair view of the outburst of violence in Sowcto and several clecrions and thereby avert the danger of the collap~ of the Lancaster other places in South Africa, requested the Sccretary- House agrcemcnl. which could have serious consequences for intcrna- General to convene the Security Council as a matter of tional peace and security; urgency and to call upon all nations, particularly the 7. Calls upon the Government of the United Kingdom to release developed countries, to implement the relevant resolu- any South African polilical prisoners, including captured freedom filhtcrs. in Southern Rhodesia and to ensure their safe passage lo any tions of the General Assembly and the Security Council. country of their choice; At the 1929th meeting on 18 June 1976, the Council 8. Strongly condemns the rrcist rdgime in South Africa for included the item in its agenda.l*W In the course of the interference in the internal affairs of Southern Rhodesia: discussions the President, with the consent of the 9. Calls upon all Member State lo respect only Ihc free and fair Council, invited the representatives of Algeria, Cuba, choice of the people of Zimbabwe; India, Liberia, Madagascar, South Africa, the United IO. L4cldrs to keep Ihe situation in Southern Rhodesia under review until the Territory attains full independence under genuine Republic of Cameroon, Yugoslavia and Zambia, at their majority rule. request, to participate in the discussion without the right to vote.‘*“ Following the vote the rcprcsentative of the United Kingdom explained his delegation’s non-participation in The Council also extended invitations under rule 39 the vote, explaining that the draft resolution was of the provisional rules of procedure to Mr. Trami unbalanced and selective, and purported to give guid- Mhlambiso of the African National Congress of South ance on the United Kingdom’s administration of its Africa and Mr. David Sibeko of the Pan Africanist colonial territory otherwise than in accordance with the Congress of Azania.‘*“ terms of the London agreement; the United Kingdom The question was considered at the 1929th and delegation could not associate itself with such a resolu- 1930th meetings, held on I8 and I9 June 1976. tion.b2s’ At the 1929th meeting the rcpraentativc of Liberia, The representative of the United States said that, speaking on behalf of the African Group, stated that the although difficulties had occurred during the implemen- events in Sowcto were reminiscent of what took place in tation of the London agreement, it was necessary for the Sharpeville in 1960, constituted a violation of human parties concerned to build on the positive elements that rights and had become the concern of the international had so far emerged. He exhorted all others not party to community. She pointed out that the African States the agreement to exercise patience and exhibit forbear- condemned the atrocities by the Pretoria rtgimc, which ance in their criticism. In explanation of vote he said had resulted in the deaths of hundreds of innocent that he understood that the resolution just adopted people, including children. and calltd on the Security called on the United Kingdom and the parties concerned Council to take bold and positive action against South to play their part in implementing the agreement, but Africa which for the past 30 years had flouted resolu- his delegation did not accept charges of violations of lions of both the Security Council and the General that agreement.ln* Assembly.‘*‘* The representative of Portugal said that his deicga- ‘1” Ibid. prar 72 and 73 tion had rupported the resolution because it reflected In’ S/IZlOO. OR. Jlrf .vr. Suppl /IW Aprtl-lunr 1976. p 64 the apprehension of the world community about the ““‘S:I2IOI,thrd ‘J’* 1929th mtg , preceding para I ID For detatls. KC chapter III ‘*‘I 2196th ml&. paras. 5 and 6 “U Ibrd. ‘*” /hid. paras 34-43 lr”o 1929th mtg.. parar 6- 17 Parr II At the same meeting the rcprcscntative of Algeria Panama. Romania. Sweden and the Unit4 Republic of called on the Council to reaffirm unanimously the Tanzania. condemnation of apartheid. to express the solidarity of In explaining his participation in the debate the the Council with the African people in South Africa and rCprCSCtttgtiVC of South Africa statad that it should not to issue an absolute prohibition of any political, econom- be construed as modifying in any way the well-known ic or military relations with the Pretoria rtgimc.rzW position of his delegation on Article 2, paragraph 7, of The representative of the United Republic of Tanza- the Charter, which was documented in the records of nia reviewed the developments in South Africa which he the Organization.‘m called a direct threat to international peace and security In the course of the 1929th and 1930th meetings a and expressed his belief that the Council had to do number of speakers called for the imposition of ma- everything within its power, in accordance with the sures stipulated in Chapter VII of the Charter of the appropriate provisions of the Charter, to ensure that an United Nations.r2*’ end was put to the apartheid system.‘zP1 The representative of Italy proposed to adopt the The representative of the USSR agreed with the press draft resolution by consensus.‘“’ statement issued on 17 June 1976 by the Acting The representative of Benin, on behalf of the sponsors Chairman of the United Nations Special Committee of the draft resolution, said that there were no objec- against Apartheid in which an appeal had been made tions to the Council proceeding in the manner proposed for a total embargo on all supplies to the armed forces by the representative of Italy. and police of South Africa and for the complete The President announced that inasmuch as draft international isolation of the South African racist resolution S/I 2103 had unanimous support in the Coun- rCgimc. and supported the strongest sanctions against cil, there appeared to be no need to vote upon it South Africa, as provided for in the Charter.‘*** formally. At the same meeting. the President informed the At the same meeting draft resolution S/12103 was Council of a letter dated I8 June 1976 from the unanimously adopted by consensus as resolution 392 Rapporteur of the Special Committee against Apartheid ( I 976).lzw with a request to address the Council on the item. In The resolution reads as follows: accordance with previous practice, the President pro- Thr Srcurify Council. posed that the Council extend an invitation, under rule Having ronsidcrrd the letter of the representatives of Renin. the 39 of the provisional rules of procedure, to the Rappor- Libyan Arab Republic and the United Republic of Tanzania, on teur of the Special Committee against Apartheid. In the behalf of the African Group at the United Nations, concerning the absence of objections, it was so decided.‘“’ mcawm of repression. including wanton killings. perpetrated by the oparrhrid regime in South Africa against the African people in The Rapporteur of the Special Committee against Sowcto and other areas in South Africa, Apartheid reiterated the Committee’s appeal for a total Having conridrrrd also the telegram from the President of the embargo on all supplies for the armed