Georgetown University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in German
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“‘ON THE VERGE OF HEARING’: EPISTEMOLOGY AND THE POETICS OF LISTENING IN THE HUMAN-NIXIE ENCOUNTER IN GERMAN LITERATURE” A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in German By Deva Fall Kemmis Hicks, M.A. Washington, DC April 18, 2012 Copyright 2012 by Deva Fall Kemmis Hicks All Rights Reserved ii “‘ON THE VERGE OF HEARING’: EPISTEMOLOGY AND THE POETICS OF LISTENING IN THE HUMAN-NIXIE ENCOUNTER IN GERMAN LITERATURE” Deva Fall Kemmis Hicks, M.A. Thesis Advisor: G. Ronald Murphy, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines selected texts of German literature in which a human being gains access to knowledge outside human scope by means of an encounter with the water nixie, seen in her mythological variations as siren, water sprite, undine, melusine, nymph, or mermaid. Texts to be considered include Das Nibelungenlied (ca. 1200), Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s “Der Fischer” (ca. 1779), Franz Kafka’s “Das Schweigen der Sirenen” (1917), Ingeborg Bachmann’s “Undine Geht” (1961), and Johannes Bobrowski’s “Undine” (1964). In each of these texts it is not the eyes that play the central role in the epistemological character of the human-nixie encounter, but the ears. In this project I argue that the human posture of attentive listening that precedes the encounter with the nixie indicates a state of readiness that leads to a moment of extraordinary awareness, in which the epistemological experience is transformational. Further, I suggest that poetry plays a pivotal role in the moment of epiphany, or of transformational knowing, for the reader. By pursuing the hypothesis that audial awareness underlies the moment of epiphany, both on the textual and poetological levels, it is my intention to contribute to the scholarship on the nature of the encounter between the mythical and the human in literature as a figuration of the larger epistemological confrontation between the eye and the ear, particularly with respect to the transformative potential of this encounter and its poetological implications. iii This dissertation is dedicated to my Doktorvater, Fr. Ronald Murphy, for inspiring me to work from the heart. I wish to thank Professors Peter Pfeiffer and Mary Helen Dupree for their invaluable guidance and support of my work. To Arthur and Walter, who taught me to listen to the sirens singing, and to my family and friends, thank you. AMDG Deva F. Kemmis Hicks iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Early Encounters: Homer’s Odyssey and Hagen and the Merewîp in the Nibelungenlied………………………………………………………………………….. 18 Chapter 2: Becoming the Listener: Goethe’s “Der Fischer” (ca. 1779)………………....44 Chapter 3: “Es war nie zu Ende”: Ingeborg Bachmann’s “Undine Geht” (1961)……….85 Chapter 4: “Hörbar leben im Dach”: the Sound of Awakening in Johannes Bobrowski’s “Undine” (1964)…………………………………………………………..136 Conclusion: Waves of Poetry and the Moment of Epiphany……………………………178 Primary Literature……………………………………………………………….………188 Secondary Literature…………………………………………………………………….190 v INTRODUCTION …Und seine Sinne waren wie entzweit: Indes der Blick ihm wie ein Hund vorauslief, umkehrte, kam und wieder weit und wartend an der nächsten Wendung stand,- blieb sein Gehör wie ein Geruch zurück. Manchmal erschien es ihm als reichte es bis an das Gehen jener beiden andern, die folgen sollten diesen ganzen Aufstieg. Rilke, “Orpheus. Eurydike. Hermes.” (24-31) …For the listener, who listens in the snow, And, nothing himself, beholds Nothing that is not there and the nothing that is. Wallace Stevens, “The Snow Man.” (13-15) When Oedipus learned that he had killed his father and married his mother, he dashed out his own eyes with his mother’s brooches, torn from her robe as she swung, having just hung herself. The chorus asks him, “Doer of dreadful deeds, how did you dare so far to do despite to your own eyes?” (Sophocles, 1327-9). After initially blaming Apollo, Oedipus replies, “But the hand that struck me was none but my own. Why should I see/ whose vision showed me nothing sweet to see?” (1335). Prized as the great intellect and riddle-solver, Oedipus lived without understanding what his eyes showed him. His knowledge of his life and family was illusory, and when he learned the truth of who he was, Oedipus no longer wished to see. In destroying his eyesight, Oedipus’ gruesome act is an indictment of his intellect and the sway it held in his life. A short time later Oedipus goes on, -with what eyes shall I look upon my people? No. If there were a means to choke the fountain 1 of hearing I would not have stayed my hand from locking up my miserable carcass, seeing and hearing nothing; it is sweet to keep our thoughts out of the range of hurt. (1385-90) The two faculties Oedipus identifies as the sources of knowledge and pain -- sight and hearing -- are the conduits he would remove altogether if he could. The emphasis on the role of the eyes as the primary organ of the epistemological endeavor has a long history, particularly prominent in the European Enlightenment (Kord 61- 78).1 Listening, as key element in the epistemological process, is often overshadowed in this history.2 This project will examine selected texts of German literature in which a human being gains access to knowledge outside human scope by means of an encounter with a supernatural being: the water nixie, seen in its mythological variations as water sprite, undine, melusine, selkie, siren, nymph, or mermaid.3 Texts to be considered include Das Nibelungenlied (ca. 1200), Goethe’s “Der Fischer” (1779), Kafka’s “Das Schweigen der Sirenen” (1917), Ingeborg Bachmann’s “Undine Geht” (1961), and Johannes Bobrowski’s “Undine” (1964). In each of 1 Albert Borgmann discusses this in terms of the etymology and history of the word “focus”, which as he notes took on a relation to the optical in the writings of Johannes Kepler. Technology 197. O’Callahan traces the dominance of the visual in terms of discourses of perception to philosophy’s modern era, in which he refers to the work of Kepler, Newton, Descartes and Berkeley 2. 2 Herder’s argument as to the medial and therefore key role that hearing plays among the senses in the invention and use of human language is an important exception. See Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache 57-62. 3 For a history of nixie figure in world literature see Frenzel Motive der Weltliteratur. Ein Lexikon dichtungsgeschichtlicher Längsschnitte 774-788, and for an account of the motiv in the Germanic tradition see Grimm Deutsche Mythologie, 244, 275-278. For a comprehensive classification of the nixie motif in world mythologies see Stith Thompson, Motif-index of folk-literature; a Classification of Narrative Elements in Folktales, Ballads, Myths (Sirens Vol. 1 pg. 369; Water Sprites Vol. 2 pg. 31; Marvels Vol. 3 F200-F399; Mermaids, Vol. 5 pg. 371). See also Austern and Nardoditskaya’s history of the siren figure in its different iterations in western and world literature in Music of the Sirens, especially Chapter 1, “Sirens in Antiquity and the Middle Ages” by Leofranc Holford-Strevens 16-52. 2 these texts it is not the eyes that play the central role in the epistemological character of the human-nixie encounter, but the ears. In this project I argue that the human posture of attentive listening that precedes the encounter with the nixie indicates a state of readiness that leads to a moment of extraordinary awareness, in which the epistemological experience is transformational. I will read these encounters in each text as figurations for the epistemological confrontation between sight and hearing. On the poetological level, I read these representations of the encounter between human and nixie as symbolic of the dialogue between reader and text, which likewise may give rise to a moment of exceptional awareness for the reader.4 This inquiry takes Albert Borgmann’s elaboration of focal occasions as the primary theoretical framework for the analysis of the representations of the human-nixie encounter in the primary texts under consideration. In his 2007 essay, Borgmann elaborates on his notion of a key condition of the meaningful human life, which he coins the focal occasion. Borgmann defines this term as a moment in which “the meaning of life comes into focus” and cites a dinner at home, a campfire in the wilderness or an evening of music as examples. These events will not always be focal occasions, of course -- Borgmann points out how preparations for the evening meal may be experienced on a given day as simple drudgery -- but they have the potential to take on that quality, especially if care is given to one’s larger life circumstances (Technology 209). 4 I define poetological as the level on which the interaction between text, author and reader is thematized. I take Hans Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutic approach to the aesthetic experience as a point of departure for the scope of possibility for dialogue at this level, discussed in both Wahrheit und Methode and in his later essays in Ästhetik und Poetik I: Kunst als Aussage. With Gadamer, I take Aristotle’s theory of anagnorisis as developed in the Poetics as foundational. Ronald Murphy’s exposition of realization theory, for instance in The Owl, the Raven and the Dove, serves as a present-day elucidation of Aristotle’s approach to aesthetics. These are the most instructive theoretical frameworks for my understanding of the potential scope and character of the aesthetic experience, which I will refer to in this work as the poetological level. 3 The epistemological question as to the precipitating conditions that underlie the moment of epiphany that is at the center of my work is informed by Borgmann’s conception of the focal occasion, but also draws on his work on the concept of focus, focal practices, and attentiveness.