DOCSLIB.ORG

USCIS Publishes Customer Satisfaction Survey on E-Verify

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USCIS Publishes Customer Satisfaction Survey on E-Verify Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Customer Satisfaction Survey – E-Verify Final Report October 15, 2010 USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey This page intentionally left blank. CFI Group Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Overall Findings and Recommendations 5 DetailedReport 7 Introduction & Methodology 9 Respondent Background 11 Customer Satisfaction Index 14 CustomerSatisfaction Model 15 DriversofSatisfaction 19 PriorityMatrix 27 Marketing/Outreach 28 Outcomes 29 Appendices Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire 30 Appendix B: Non-Modeled Responses 44 Appendix C: Results Tables 58 Appendix D: Verbatim Comments 72 CFI Group 1 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey This page intentionally left blank. CFI Group 2 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CFI Group 3 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey This page intentionally left blank. CFI Group 4 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey Overall Findings and Recommendations This report focuses on the customer satisfaction of companies currently enrolled in the E-Verify program. The Customer Satisfaction Index for E-Verify is 82. This is a positive result, especially when compared to benchmarks such as the latest federal government satisfaction index, which is 69. Even more so when considering that many of the users signed up not voluntarily, but because of a requirement from local, state or federal government or a parent company. In addition to rating overall satisfaction with E-Verify, users evaluated different areas of performance involving E-Verify depending on whether that particular area applied to the user. Using E-Verify is one of the highest rated areas and has the most impact on customers’ satisfaction with E-Verify. Users rated the initial response as being quite fast and submitting I-9 information being easy. Next steps were fairly clear in the response and navigating the website was relatively easy. Three-fourths of the respondents enrolled their organization with E-Verify and the registration process received a solid score in the low 80’s. Users thought the speed of receiving their User Name, Password and E-Verify Web Address was good as well as the ease of submitting registration information. The Tutorial also received mostly positive ratings, in particular for taking the online training in terms of understanding the content as well as the ease of accessing online resources. The online tutorial was rated lower for the amount of time required to complete the online training. About one-third (31%) of users indicated they were asked to match a photo and Photo Matching was the highest rated area, as users rated it being easy to use and quite helpful in preventing fraud. Less than one-third (29%) of the respondents received a Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC). Of those who did, they rated this process as being adequate with scores in the upper 70’s. Rated equally well were the ease and speed of resolving the case as well as the clarity of communications about steps involved in the resolution process. One-fifth (20%) of respondents contacted E-Verify customer service in the past 6 months. For those who did contact customer service, scores were good. With only one agent assisting them (a transfer did not occur) the score for customer service was in the upper 80’s. If a transfer did occur then scores were rated in the mid to low 80’s. Customer Service representatives were rated highest for their professionalism. Similarly, while only 6% of respondents had contacted Technical Assistance in the past 6 months this area was rated well. Technical Assistance staff also received the highest scores for professionalism. Respondents were asked about their awareness of changes made to the E-Verify system. Almost two- thirds noticed the changes and just under half said they represent a significant improvement to the system. Users stated they were likely to recommend E-Verify and they also have a high degree of confidence in its accuracy. Respondents also indicated that they are very likely to participate in the future with a rating in the low 90’s for future participation. In order to improve customer satisfaction, it is recommended to target the areas that have a high impact and are lower performing as priorities. Given the overall satisfaction score of 82, any sizable improvement in satisfaction may be somewhat difficult. Using E-Verify has the highest impact on satisfaction, however it is already a high scoring area as well, so it may not be possible to significantly improve this area. - Should USCIS seek improvement in the area of Using E-Verify, explore ways to make the next steps in the response more clear and focus on the users navigation of the website. CFI Group 5 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey Registration and Tutorial appear to be the best opportunities to improve customer satisfaction with E- Verify. - With respect to the Registration Process, focus on improvements to the clarity of instruction for enrolling as well as the memorandum of understanding stating the employer’s responsibilities and next steps to drive up scores in this area and subsequently increase customer satisfaction. - The Tutorial, which is a touchpoint for all users, is another opportunity to drive customer satisfaction. Users would like a tutorial that is less time consuming. Ratings of the tutorial show that for the most part, the content and resources easy to understand and useful. - Verbatim comments, included in Appendix D of this report, provide additional insight into these areas of opportunities. CFI Group 6 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey DETAILED REPORT CFI Group 7 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey This page intentionally left blank. CFI Group 8 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey Introduction & Methodology The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) is the national indicator of customer evaluations of the quality of goods and services available to U.S. residents. It is the only uniform, cross- industry/government measure of customer satisfaction. Since 1994, the ACSI has measured satisfaction, its causes, and its effects, for seven economic sectors, 41 industries, more than 200 private sector companies, two types of local government services, the U.S. Postal Service, and the Internal Revenue Service. ACSI has measured more than 100 programs of federal government agencies since 1999. This allows benchmarking between the public and private sectors and provides information unique to each agency on how its activities that interface with the public affect the satisfaction of customers. The effects of satisfaction are estimated, in turn, on specific objectives (such as public trust). Segment Choice This study is about employers who have enrolled in E-Verify–an Internet-based system operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA) that allows participating employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of their newly hired employees. Customer Samples and Data Collection The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) provided CFI Group with five stratified random samples of employers that have enrolled in E-Verify. (The samples were drawn in mid-June, 2010.) ALL Users – a cross-section of employers that have run a case in E-Verify since Jan. 2009 NON Users – a cross-section of employers that enrolled in E-Verify in 2008 or 2009 but who have never run a case RECENT Users – an oversample {*} of employers that have run a case in E-Verify since Jan. 2010 FAR Users – an oversample of employers that are enrolled in E-Verify as federal contractors and have run a case in E-Verify since Sept. 9, 2009—the date the FAR clause became effective LAPSED Users – an oversample of employers that ran five or more cases in E-Verify in 2009, but none through mid-June 2010 {*} NOTE: The purpose for the three oversamples was to supplement the numbers of responses from Recent, FAR, and Lapsed Users that were expected in the All User cross-section. Data were collected from July 6th through July 30th 2010. The sample sizes and response rates for the cross-section samples and oversamples are reported below: Size of {1} TOTAL {3} Type of Sample Usable Surveys Response Usable {2} Number of USER Provided Sample Returned Rate Surveys Responses All 5000 4530 1089 24% 1051 1051 Non 6000 5960 426 7% 397 397 Recent 1000 939 257 27% 248 1178 FAR 2500 2409 678 28% 657 800 Lapsed 4000 3772 554 15% 477 524 NOTES: {1} Initial sample sizes were based on the desired number of responses and expected completion rates. {2} Due to ineligible respondents or missing data, not all surveys that were returned were usable. CFI Group 9 Final Report USCIS – E-Verify 2010 Customer Satisfaction Survey {3} Includes respondents from the oversamples and, where relevant, the All Users cross-section. In several instances, respondents from the All Users cross-section fell into more than one of the oversample categories. Questionnaire and Reporting The questionnaire used is shown in Appendix A. It was designed to be agency-specific in terms of activities, outcomes, and introductions to the questionnaire and specific question areas. However, it follows a format common to all the federal agency questionnaires that allow cause-and-effect modeling using the ACSI model. CFI Group collaborated with USCIS to develop the questionnaire for the program. Most of the questions in the survey asked the respondent to rate items on a 1 to 10 scale, where “1” is “poor” and “10” is “excellent.” Scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale for reporting purposes. Appendix B contains tables of responses to non-modeled questions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EVIDENCE from DACA Elira Kuka Na'ama S
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DO HUMAN CAPITAL DECISIONS RESPOND TO THE RETURNS TO EDUCATION? EVIDENCE FROM DACA Elira Kuka Na'ama Shenhav Kevin Shih Working Paper 24315 http://www.nber.org/papers/w24315 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2018 We would like to thank Anna Aizer, Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes, Elizabeth Cascio, Aimee Chin, Chloe East, Hilary Hoynes, Chris Karbownik, Melissa Kearney, Ethan Lewis, Dan Millimet, Matt Notowidigdo, Francesc Ortega, Marianne Page, Bruce Sacerdote, Diane Schanzenbach, and Doug Staiger, as well as seminar participants at Northwestern MPES, University of Connecticut, Oklahoma State University, the US Census Bureau, and conference participants at the Barcelona GSE Summer Forum Migration meeting, UC Davis Alumni Conference, WEAI Conference, SEA Conference, SOLE Annual Meeting, and AEA Annual Meeting for helpful suggestions and feedback. We are also grateful to Marcella Alsan for her feedback and for generously sharing data on Secure Communities activation dates with us. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2018 by Elira Kuka, Na'ama Shenhav, and Kevin Shih. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Do Human Capital Decisions Respond to the Returns to Education? Evidence from DACA Elira Kuka, Na'ama Shenhav, and Kevin Shih NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    WPS6567 Policy Research Working Paper 6567 Public Disclosure Authorized Is Small Better? A Comparison of the Effect of Large and Small Dams Public Disclosure Authorized on Cropland Productivity in South Africa Elodie Blanc Eric Strobl Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Development Economics Vice Presidency Partnerships, Capacity Building Unit August 2013 Policy Research Working Paper 6567 Abstract This study estimates and compares the effects of small effect on cropland within the vicinity. However, their and large irrigation dams on cropland productivity in existence can enhance the relatively small positive impact South Africa. To this end, a panel data set of South of local small dams. Although a cost-benefit analysis of African river basins is constructed. The econometric irrigation benefits shows that small dams may be more analysis reveals that although large dams increase viable than large ones, large dams can play a potentially cropland productivity downstream, they have a negative important role within a system of both types of dams. This paper is a product of the Partnerships, Capacity Building Unit, Development Economics Vice Presidency. It is part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world. Policy Research Working Papers are also posted on the Web at http://econ.worldbank.org. The authors may be contacted at is [email protected]. The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished.
    [Show full text]
  • Promotion, Turnover and Satisfaction in the Army Civilian Workforce
    Dissertation Promotion, Turnover, and Satisfaction in the Army Civilian Workforce An Analysis of Features of Occupation Ladders and Employee Perspectives of the Work Environment Christina E. Steiner This document was submitted as a dissertation in December 2018 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of of Lawrence M. Hanser (Chair), Shanthi Nataraj, Gery Ryan, and Curt Gilroy (outside reader). PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD434.html Published 2019 by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. R® is a registered trademark Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • March 25—Minutes
    VIRTUAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS March 25, 2021 at 4:00 pm MINUTES Directors Present: Basil Seggos, Chair Vicki Been Leslie Wright for Director Kulleseid Michael Kuh Rose Harvey Sarah Nielson for Director Silver Aloysee Heredia Jarmoszuk Jeffrey Kaplan Purnima Kapur Lowell Kern Pamela Frederick Lawrence Goldberg Appearances: Hudson River Park Trust: Noreen Doyle, Acting President and CEO Daniel Kurtz, CFO and Executive Vice President, Finance & Real Estate Christine Fazio, General Counsel Also Present: Connie Fishman, Hudson River Park Friends Jeffrey LeFrancois, Advisory Council Chair 1 With a quorum being present, Chair Seggos called to order the March 25, 2021 meeting of the Hudson River Park Trust Board of Directors. He explained that due to the coronavirus pandemic and consistent with Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.1 issued on March 12, 2020, this meeting is being held remotely via a Zoom teleconference enabling participation of the Directors and the general public. Chair Seggos then noted that all Directors have received the Agenda materials in advance of this meeting and are free to ask questions or comment at any time on the action items submitted for approval today. Chair Seggos further noted that questions or comments from the audience will not be entertained at this meeting. I note that the Board memos and resolutions on today’s agenda have been posted on the Trust website in the link entitled Board Meetings, Bylaws and Other Materials under Board Agendas and Minutes and thus are available to the public. Chair
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of Liberals' and Conservatives' Respective
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Sociology Theses Department of Sociology 1-6-2017 Red Show, Blue Show: A Content Analysis of Liberals’ and Conservatives’ Respective Television Favorites Nicholas Rogers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_theses Recommended Citation Rogers, Nicholas, "Red Show, Blue Show: A Content Analysis of Liberals’ and Conservatives’ Respective Television Favorites." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2017. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_theses/63 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Sociology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RED SHOW, BLUE SHOW: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF LIBERALS’ AND CONSERVATIVES’ RESPECTIVE TELEVISION FAVORITES by NICK ROGERS Under the Direction of Ben L. Kail, PhD ABSTRACT Ideological partisans in the United States are increasingly “sorting” themselves along cultural lines, from the cable news stations they watch to the chain restaurants they prefer. How do partisans seem to “know” how to sort themselves along ideological lines in cultural realms that offer no obvious political cues? To investigate this question, I look to the realm of narrative television, where conservatives and liberals have certain unique favorite programs despite the programs lacking any overt political content. I employ a quantitative content analysis to demonstrate that the substance of these polarizing shows relate to the social traits of curiosity, conformity, relativism, dogmatism, tribalism, vigilance, and chastity, which have previously been demonstrated to correspond to political ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Extreme Media on Political Behavior, Attitudes, and Media Selection
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Political Science Dissertations Department of Political Science Spring 1-23-2013 The Effects of Extreme Media on Political Behavior, Attitudes, and Media Selection James B. Taylor Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss Recommended Citation Taylor, James B., "The Effects of Extreme Media on Political Behavior, Attitudes, and Media Selection." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2013. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_diss/28 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF EXTREME MEDIA ON POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, ATTITUDES, AND MEDIA SELECTION by JAMES BENJAMIN TAYLOR Under the Direction of Sean Richey ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the role of extreme media (i.e. political talk radio and cable news opinion shows) on the political attitudes of viewers and listeners. I investigate whether extreme media has both positive and negative externalities for democratic citizenship. Specif- ically, I use laboratory experiments, national survey data, and qualitative interviews to test the impact of extreme media on viewers' political knowledge, trust in government, efficacy, and political tolerance. I use laboratory experiments in controlled settings to uncover the impact of viewership on political knowledge, trust in government, and efficacy. I confirm these lab findings with the national survey data, by using propensity score matching and ordered probit models to demonstrate that exposure to extreme media produces political knowledge and efficacy, but decreases trust in government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Day After Tomorrow
    OF ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE OF ECONOMIC POLICY INTHE A HANDBOOK ONTHEFUTURE AFTER THE DAY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized CANUTOANDMARCELOGIUGALE,EDITORS OTAVIANO DEVELOPING WORLD TOMORROW THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW A Handbook on the Future of Economic Policy in the Developing World OTAVIANO CANUTO AND MARCELO GIUGALE Editors © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 13 12 11 10 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Develop- ment / The World Bank. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorse- ment or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Recon- struction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will nor- mally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition Parties and Anti-Government Protests in Comparative Perspective
    OPPOSITION PARTIES AND ANTI-GOVERNMENT PROTESTS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE by Yen-Pin Su B.A., National Taiwan University, 2001 M.A., National Taiwan University, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Yen-Pin Su It was defended on March 26, 2014 and approved by Steven Finkel, Daniel Wallace Professor, Political Science John Markoff, Distinguished University Professor, Sociology Co-Dissertation Advisor: Scott Morgenstern, Associate Professor, Political Science Co-Dissertation Advisor: Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, Associate Professor, Political Science ii Copyright © by Yen-Pin Su 2014 iii OPPOSITION PARTIES AND ANTI-GOVERNMENT PROTESTS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Yen-Pin Su, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 My dissertation adopts an interdisciplinary approach to examine the relationship between political parties and social movements in democratic countries. This work touches on the debates about why protest movements emerge and the literature on the consequences of party politics. It draws on rational choice and political process theories to explain the variation in anti- government protests in the context of democracies. I argue that the mobilization capacity of opposition parties matters for understanding the differing levels of protests. Specifically, focusing on the size and unity of the opposition camp as two unique dimensions of mobilization capacity, I contend that a larger opposition camp should encourage more anti-government protests only if the camp is more united. Moreover, I argue that, because of the differences in socio-economic backgrounds, political development trajectories, and the role of parties as mobilization agents, the effects of opposition mobilization capacity should work differently in developed countries and developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • View All Four Women Again, but with Another Purpose in Mind
    DEMYSTIFYING THE NOTION, “THE WEST IS BETTER”: A GERMAN ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Jennifer Stanek A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2011 Committee: Dr. Christina Guenther, Advisor Dr. Kristie Foell ii ABSTRACT Dr. Christina Guenther, Advisor I began my project in 2004 as an oral history project, involving four German women, with the purpose of finding out what motivated them either to flee East Germany before the construction of the Berlin Wall or stay. Five years later I wished to revive my project and interview all four women again, but with another purpose in mind. What had started out as a desire to understand my own family’s past turned into a desire to gain a better idea of the complexity of the notion, “the West is better,” and, therefore, an even better understanding of what moved a people across dangerous borders. In this thesis I examine what the idea, “the West is better,” meant to real individuals, who chose a life in the West either before the construction of the Wall on August 13, 1961 or in the 1980s before the fall of the Wall. I examine how this notion applied to their experiences specifically, the GDR-refugees’ contribution to the creation and perpetuation of this idea, and how this concept has affected the German people since 1949. The notion, “the West is better,” assumed much mythical character during the existence of the GDR, which it largely has not shed.
    [Show full text]
  • Combat-Related Reproductive Trauma: Implications for Quality of Life and the Reproductive Narrative
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr College Dissertations and Theses 2018 Combat-Related Reproductive Trauma: Implications for Quality of Life and the Reproductive Narrative Laura S. Covington Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations Part of the Social Work Commons Custom Citation Covington, Laura S. "Combat-Related Reproductive Trauma: Implications for Quality of Life and the Reproductive Narrative." PhD Diss., Bryn Mawr College, 2018. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/188 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Combat-Related Reproductive Trauma: Implications for Quality of Life and the Reproductive Narrative by Laura S. Covington March 2018 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research of Bryn Mawr College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy COPYRIGHT 2018 Laura S. Covington Copyright Notice: The dissertation submitted as part of the requirements for a degree is the property of the College. However, the author of the dissertation owns and retains the copyright in the dissertation, without further registration formalities. ii Abstract Little research exists on the experiences of a combat-related injury that impairs fertility. This dissertation is a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of military members after a genitourinary (GU) injury. It addresses the biological, psychological, and social impact on quality of life during recovery and subsequent attitudes about family development and sexual functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, International Trade and Capital Formation: Cause Or Effect?
    IZA DP No. 6975 Migration, International Trade and Capital Formation: Cause or Effect? Gabriel Felbermayr Volker Grossmann Wilhelm Kohler October 2012 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Migration, International Trade and Capital Formation: Cause or Effect? Gabriel Felbermayr University of Munich, Ifo Institute and GEP Nottingham Volker Grossmann University of Fribourg, IZA and CESifo Wilhelm Kohler University of Tübingen, CESifo and GEP Nottingham Discussion Paper No. 6975 October 2012 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minneapolis Plan to End Too Big to Fail
    THE MINNEAPOLIS PLAN TO END TOO BIG TO FAIL DECEMBER 2017 THE MINNEAPOLIS PLAN | ENDING TOO BIG TO FAIL | CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Comments & Responses 1 Summary for Policymakers 39 The Minneapolis Plan 59 Section 1 Summary 59 Section 2 Recommendations: Key Support and Motivation 67 Section 3 General Empirical Approach for the Capital and Leverage 88 Tax Recommendations Section 4 Technical Calculations for the Capital and Leverage 116 Tax Recommendations Section 5 The Banking and Financial System Post-Proposal Implementation 124 Appendix A The Leverage Ratio in the Minneapolis Plan 126 Appendix B Ending TBTF Initiative Process 128 References 161 | 1 | FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS THE MINNEAPOLIS PLAN TO END TOO BIG TO FAIL DECEMBER 2017 COMMENTS & RESPONSES THE MINNEAPOLIS PLAN | ENDING TOO BIG TO FAIL | COMMENTS & RESPONSES The Minneapolis Plan to End Too Big To Fail COMMENTS PROVIDED AND RESPONSES he Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis issued a draft Plan to End Too Big to Fail on November T16, 2016. The Plan included a request for comment that contained 11 specific questions for respondents to address. In addition, the Minneapolis Fed has presented the Plan in a number of forums, also with the goal of soliciting comments. This section of the Final Proposal details the comments we received in the process, our responses to the comments, and the revisions, if any, made to address the comments. We organize the comments by the relevant question they addressed. Note that we summarize the comments we received rather than providing them verbatim, both for brevity and to increase their clarity.
    [Show full text]