DOCSLIB.ORG

Nietzsche on Criminality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nietzsche on Criminality University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School April 2021 Nietzsche on Criminality Laura N. McAllister University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation McAllister, Laura N., "Nietzsche on Criminality" (2021). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8827 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nietzsche on Criminality by Laura N. McAllister A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Joshua Rayman, Ph.D. Peter R. Sedgwick, Ph.D. Stephen Turner, Ph.D. Alex Levine, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 24, 2021 Keywords: Freedom, Justice, Punishment, Revenge, Criminal, Greatness Copyright © 2021, Laura N. McAllister ACKNOWLEDGMENTS While writing this dissertation I have received a great deal of support and guidance and I would like to pay special thanks and appreciation to the persons below who made this dissertation successful and assisted me throughout in helping me to reach my goal. I would first like to thank my major professor and mentor, Dr. Joshua Rayman, who has always inspired and encouraged me to be a better philosopher and writer. His invaluable knowledge, helpful feedback, and conscientious guidance was instrumental to the whole of this project. Moreover, he was the sole editor of my dissertation and I offer my sincerest gratitude for his hard work and attention to detail, which has sharpened my thinking and brought my writing to a higher level. Although I may have taken longer to complete this dissertation than he may have wished, he continued to support me and pushed me when necessary. I remain ineffably indebted to him. I want to extend my heartfelt thanks to Dr. Peter R. Sedgwick for agreeing to be a member of my committee. Not only was his work a valuable resource, but I am deeply indebted to him for the thought-provoking, amusing, and sometimes deeply personal correspondence we shared over the past two years. I extend my gratitude to Dr. Alex Levine, who offered to be a part of my committee. Despite not being a Nietzsche scholar, his participation and feedback was greatly appreciated. I am also extremely thankful to Dr. Stephen Turner for remaining on my committee despite it taking me so long to finish my dissertation. In addition, I want to express my deepest gratitude to parents and family, without whom I am nothing. They not only assisted me financially but always supported me emotionally throughout this long, and oftentimes challenging, process. They never gave up on me and consistently reassured me that I had the knowledge and ability to complete my dissertation and I am truly grateful. Last, but not least, I want to thank my wonderful and beautiful friends, who have always encouraged me and listened to me talk about Nietzsche incessantly. In particular, I want to thank Adam Karros, who helped to resolve numerous technical issues, for which I am sincerely appreciative. Finally, to my dear friend, Oliver Foland, with whom I have had many long conversations about my project. I always turned to him when I was stuck, and I will be forever thankful for his valuable insights, philosophical comprehension, and constant encouragement. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. iv Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... vi Chapter One: Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 Chapter Two: The Individual, Free Will, Responsibility, and Guilt ............................................ 16 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 16 2. Nietzsche’s Historical, Genealogical, and Psychological Account of the Individual ................................................................................................................ 18 19 2.1. The Origin of Autonomy, Free Will, Responsibility, and Moral Blame .... 18 2.2. The Origin of Guilt and the Bad Conscience ........................................... 24 3. Nietzsche’s Critique of the Individual................................................................. 31 3.1. The Psychology of Freedom, Willing, and Guilt ..................................... 32 3.2. The Will as Causal .................................................................................. 35 3.3. Causa Sui ............................................................................................... 37 3.4. The Subject ............................................................................................ 38 3.5. The Conscience and Moral Judgements .................................................. 40 3.6. The Conscience, Obedience, and Freedom .............................................. 45 4. Nietzsche’s Privileged, Alternative Perspective .................................................. 48 4.1. Nietzsche’s Revaluation of Freedom and Responsibility ......................... 48 4.2. The Innocence of Becoming ................................................................... 49 4.3. Overcoming the Conscience and the Bad Conscience ............................. 54 4.4. Freedom and the Possibility of Genuine Agency ..................................... 56 5. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 67 Chapter Three: Justice ............................................................................................................... 69 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 69 2. Nietzsche’s Genealogical, and Psychological Account of Justice ........................ 71 2.1. Justice and Rights: A State of Equilibrium .............................................. 71 2.2. Justice and Law: A Device Used by the Powerful ................................... 76 3. Nietzsche’s Critique of Justice............................................................................ 79 3.1. Justice and Slave Morality ...................................................................... 79 3.2. Justice and Will to Power........................................................................ 82 3.3. Justice, Equality, and the Negation of Rights .......................................... 84 3.4. Justice, Equality, and the Elevation of Man ............................................. 88 3.5. Justice, Equality, and Revenge ................................................................ 90 4. Nietzsche’s Privileged, Alternative Perspective .................................................. 93 4.1. A New Justice ......................................................................................... 93 4.2. Justice as a Personal Value ...................................................................... 94 i 4.3. Justice and Ressentiment ......................................................................... 97 4.4. The Self-Overcoming of Justice .............................................................. 99 4.5. Mercy and Forgiveness ......................................................................... 101 4.6. Justice, Pathos of Distance, and the Necessity of Enemies .................... 103 4.7. Exemplary Individuals .......................................................................... 107 Chapter Four: Punishment ....................................................................................................... 110 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 110 2. Nietzsche’s Historical, Genealogical, and Psychological Account of Punishment ... 113 2.1. Punishment and the Morality of Mores ................................................. 113 2.2. Cruelty is Festive .................................................................................. 116 2.3. Understanding the Origin and Utility of Punishment ............................. 118 2.4. The Lawbreaker and Punishment in the Community ............................. 122 2.5. Punishment and Power ......................................................................... 123 3. Nietzsche’s Critique of Punishment .................................................................. 124 3.1. Morality and the Abolition of Punishment ............................................ 126 3.2. Punishment and the State ...................................................................... 130 3.3. The Moral Right to Punish .................................................................... 132 3.4. The Arbitrary Determination of Guilt in a Court of Law ....................... 136 3.5. Punishment as a Stimulant for Guilt ...................................................... 138 3.6. Punishment, Proportionality, and Retributive Theory ............................ 140 3.7. Punishment,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative Philip J
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Philosophy College of Arts & Sciences 3-2007 Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative Philip J. Kain Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/phi Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Kain, P. J. "Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative," The outheS rn Journal of Philosophy, 45 (2007): 105-116. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Kain, P. J. "Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative," The outheS rn Journal of Philosophy, 45 (2007): 105-116., which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00044.x. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. https://www.pdcnet.org/collection/ authorizedshow?id=southernjphil_2007_0045_0001_0105_0116&pdfname=southernjphil_2007_0045_0001_0109_0120.pdf&file_type=pdf This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative Philip J. Kain Santa Clara University I Nietzsche embraces the doctrine of eternal recurrence for the first time at Gay Science §341:1 The greatest weight.—What, if some day or night a demon were to steal after you into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: "This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and everything unutterably small or great in your life will have to return to you, all in the same succession and sequence—even this spider and this moonlight between the trees, and even this moment and I myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's Naturalism As a Critique of Morality and Freedom
    NIETZSCHE’S NATURALISM AS A CRITIQUE OF MORALITY AND FREEDOM A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Nathan W. Radcliffe December, 2012 Thesis written by Nathan W. Radcliffe B.S., University of Akron, 1998 M.A., Kent State University, 2012 Approved by Gene Pendleton____________________________________, Advisor David Odell‐Scott___________________________________, Chair, Department of Philosophy Raymond Craig_____________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTERS I. NIETZSCHE’S NATURALISM AND ITS INFLUENCES....................................................... 8 1.1 Nietzsche’s Speculative‐Methodological Naturalism............................................ 8 1.2 Nietzsche’s Opposition to Materialism ............................................................... 15 1.3 The German Materialist Influence on Nietzsche................................................. 19 1.4 The Influence of Lange on Nietzsche .................................................................. 22 1.5 Nietzsche’s Break with Kant and Its Aftermath................................................... 25 1.6 Influences on Nietzsche’s Fatalism (Schopenhauer and Spinoza)
    [Show full text]
  • FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE NON- FICTION TWILIGHT of the IDOLS UNABRIDGED and the ANTICHRIST Read by Barnaby Edwards
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE NON- FICTION TWILIGHT OF THE IDOLS UNABRIDGED and THE ANTICHRIST Read by Barnaby Edwards The last works completed before Nietzsche’s final years of insanity, Twilight of the Idols and The Antichrist contain some of his most passionate and polemical writing. Both display his profound understanding of human nature and continue themes developed in The Genealogy of Morals, as the philosopher lashes out at the deceptiveness of modern culture and morality. Twilight of the Idols attacks European society, Christianity and the works of Socrates and Plato, which he proclaims are life-denying as they prioritise reason over instinct and the after-world over the apparent world. The Antichrist explores the history, psychology and moral precepts of Christianity, forming his final assault on organised religion. Barnaby Edwards has recorded more than 60 audiobooks. Perhaps best known for his role as a Dalek operator in the television series Doctor Who, he has provided voices for three of the BBC’s Doctor Who video games Total running time: 7:14:00 and has worked as a director, writer and actor for several related audio View our catalogue online at n-ab.com/cat dramas by Big Finish Productions. He also plays the computer L.E.M.O.N. in the comic sci-fi audio series Strangeness in Space. His audiobooks have won several awards, including the Best Original Work Audie and the Guardian’s Audiobook of the Month. 1 Twilight of the Idols 3:23 27 6. Let us finally consider what naivete it shows… 2:39 2 Apophthegms and Darts 10:35 28 The Four Great Errors 2:09 3 The Problem of Socrates 1:38 29 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pippi Longstocking As Friedrich Nietzsche's Overhuman1
    Confero | Vol. 4 | no. 1 | 2016 | pp. 97-135 | doi: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.160111 Pippi Longstocking as Friedrich Nietzsche’s overhuman1 Michael Tholander n January 3, 1889, Friedrich Nietzsche walks out from his lodging at Piazza Carlo Alberto in Turin. Suddenly, he witnesses a coachman flogging his old and tired horse. He rushes forward and throws himself around the horse’s Oneck in an attempt to protect it. Then, after bursting into tears, he falls to the ground, unconscious, perhaps struck, for the first time, by the serious symptoms of advanced syphilis.2 This event concluded Nietzsche’s prolific career at the early age of 44. It would be followed by more than a decade of crippling physical and mental disorder, before he died his second, and definitive, death on August 25, 1900. Thus, despite having 1 This essay is a rewritten and extended English version of the one published in connection with the hundredth anniversary of the death of Nietzsche: Tholander, Michael (2000). Friedrich Nietzsche – och Pippi Långstrump. Tvärsnitt, 22(3), 2-17. 2 Other theories suggest that Nietzsche suffered from a series of strokes, from dementia or from brain cancer, or that he fell victim to a combination of these maladies. See, e.g., Butler, Paul (2011). A Stroke of Bad Luck: CADASIL and Friedrich Nietzsche’s “Dementia” or Madness. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Dementia: History and Incidence. Santa Barbara: Praeger. Michael Tholander declared the exacting precept “Die at the right time!”3 in his most well-known book, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche, quite ironically, died all too early, as well as all too late.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing Spirits: the Nietzschean Übermensch and the Chinese Sages
    138 Chapter 3: Dancing spirits: the Nietzschean Übermensch and the Chinese sages O life: … I dance after you, I follow wherever your traces linger. Where are you? Give me your hand! Or only one finger! … That is a dance up high and down low: I am the hunter; would you be my dog or my doe? … Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra The I Ching reveals to its reader eternal patterns of cosmic change that may assist those who wish to fulfil their innate potential for good. To accept and to follow the Decree of Heaven appears to be the core of the I Ching. The diversity of nature is represented in the I Ching by means of the hexagrams that provide clues to the reader of the appropriate action to be taken under various circumstances of this changing physical world. Constant change in nature seems evitable and serves as an inspiration to the authors of the I Ching. Confucius (1993:33) recognizes the terrible quality of change in all existence and is inspired by running water. Standing by a stream, the Master muses: ‘Things that go past are like this, aren’t they? For they do not set aside day or night.’ Chuang Tzu (1968:240) is also aware of the fragility and transience of human life, stating that ‘man’s life between heaven and earth is like the passing of a white colt glimpsed through a crack in the wall whoosh! and that’s the end.’ In Chapter 13 of the Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu (1963:69), too, realizes the inevitable horror of bodily existence: ‘The reason I have great trouble is that I have a body.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2017 Course Title: an Introduction to Nietzsche: Philosophy and Cultural Criticism Course Code: PHI 103 Instructor: Frederick Dolan
    Preliminary Course Syllabus Quarter: Spring 2017 Course Title: An Introduction to Nietzsche: Philosophy and Cultural Criticism Course Code: PHI 103 Instructor: Frederick Dolan Course Summary: An introduction to the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900), emphasizing his philosophy, cultural criticism, and the relationship between his work and life. Please see course page for a full description and additional details. Grade Options and Requirements: No Grade Requested (NGR) – No work required, no credit received, no proof of attendance provided. Credit/No Credit (CR/NC) – Must attend at least 80% of class sessions. Letter Grade (A, B, C, D, No Pass) – Must attend at least 80% of class sessions and complete a piece of written work (to be discussed further in class). *Please Note: If you require proof that you completed a Continuing Studies course for any reason (for example, employer reimbursement), you must choose either the Letter Grade or Credit/No Credit option. Courses taken for NGR will not appear on official transcripts or grade reports. Tentative Weekly Outline: Meeting #1: “To look at science in the perspective of art, but at art in that of life.” Ecce Homo (in Basic Writings of Nietzsche). Meeting #2: Nietzsche, Wagner, and the Greeks. The Birth of Tragedy (in Basic Writings of Nietzsche). Meeting #3: Nietzsche as Cultural Diagnostician. The Advantages and Disadvantages of History for Life (on Canvas). The Gay Science, 1886 Preface and p.276. Beyond Good and Evil, Part Two and p. 204-205, 212, 223-224 (in Basic Writings of Nietzsche). Meeting #4: Morality as a Problem. The Genealogy of Morals (in Basic Writings of Nietzsche).
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing the Void: Nietzsche's "Zarathustra" and the Political. James Daniel Stewart Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 Embracing the Void: Nietzsche's "Zarathustra" and the Political. James Daniel Stewart Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Stewart, James Daniel, "Embracing the Void: Nietzsche's "Zarathustra" and the Political." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 436. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/436 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's and Pessoa's Psychological Fictionalism
    Nietzsche’s and Pessoa’s Psychological Fictionalism Antonio Cardiello* & Pietro Gori** Keywords Nietzsche; Pessoa; Vaihinger; Mead; Fictionalism; Subjectivity; Neo-Kantianism. Abstract In a note to G.R.S. Mead’s Quests Old and New, where he Found a section devoted to Hans Vaihinger’s main ideas, Fernando Pessoa reFlects on the consequences oF the Fictionalist approach to both our perception oF the I and the value oF consciousness. These questions correspond to some statements that we Find in Nietzsche’s writings, which in particular Vaihinger reFers to in his Die Philosophie des Als-ob. Our aim is thus to compare Nietzsche’s and Pessoa’s view oF the I and consciousness, and to deal with their psychology by making reFerence to Vaihinger’s Fictionalism. Palavras-chave Nietzsche; Pessoa; Vaihinger; Mead; Ficcionalismo; Subjectividade; Neokantismo. Resumo Num apontamento relacionado com a leitura de Quests Old and New de G.R.S. Mead, que revisita as teses principais de Hans Vaihinger, Fernando Pessoa reFlecte sobre as consequências de uma abordagem Ficcionalista quanto à percepção do eu e ao valor da consciência. As questões que Pessoa coloca encontram correspondência com os escritos de Nietzsche a quem Vaihinger se reFere, em particular, no seu livro Philosophie des Als-ob. O nosso intuito é o de aproFundar a comparação entre a concepção do eu e da consciência em Nietzsche e Pessoa, reconstruindo as posições de ambos nos moldes do Ficcionalismo de Vaihinger. * IFILNOVA – Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas – Universidade Nova de Lisboa. ** IFILNOVA – Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas – Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Cardiello & Gori Psychological Fictionalism Sou nada..
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's Theory of the Will
    Philosophers’ , . that Nietzsche has provocative views about the I mprint nature of the will and free will. It is less often appreciated that I his views on these topics have considerable merit. Nietzsche not only anticipates and lends argumentative support to the new wave of non-libertarian incompatibilism defended by philosophers like Derk Pereboom () and Galen Strawson () — the view that free will is incompatible with “determinism” and that there is no credible ac- count of free will as outside the causal order in the ong — but his Nietzsche’s Theory theory of the will also wins some support from recent work on the will in empirical psychology (see Wegner ). As a philosophical naturalist, Nietzsche thought of his theoretical endeavors as proceed- ing in tandem with empirical inquiry (Leiter : –). As befits his of the Will self-designation as “the first psychologist”, it turns out that Nietzsche anticipated results that psychologists only arrived at a century later. In section of Daybreak, Nietzsche sets out the primary issues that shall occupy us here in trying to understand his theory of the will. Nietzsche writes: We laugh at him who steps out of his room at the mo- ment when the sun steps out of its room, and then says: “I will that the sun shall rise”; and at him who cannot stop a . In discussing Nietzsche’s “theory of the will”, I am concerned with the notion Brian Leiter of “will” familiar from general philosophy of action, both contemporary and historical, namely, the idea of a human faculty, whatever its precise character, that stands in some kind of necessary relationship with action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche VOL
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE Or, How to Philosophise with the Hammer THE ANTICHRIST NOTES TO ZARATHUSTRA, AND ETERNAL RECURRENCE TRANSLATED BY ANTHONY M. LUDOVICI The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche The First Complete and Authorised English Translation Edited by Dr Oscar Levy Volume Sixteen T.N. FOULIS 13 & 15 FREDERICK STREET EDINBURGH: AND LONDON 1911 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com CONTENTS TWILIGHT OF THE IDOLS TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE PREFACE MAXIMS AND MISSILES THE PROBLEM OF SOCRATES "REASON" IN PHILOSOPHY MORALITY AS THE ENEMY OF NATURE THE FOUR GREAT ERRORS THE "IMPROVERS" OF MANKIND THINGS THE GERMANS LACK SKIRMISHES IN A WAR WITH THE AGE THINGS I OWE TO THE ANCIENTS THE ANTICHRIST THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE NOTES TO ZARATHUSTRA TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE The Twilight of the Idols was written towards the end of the summer of 1888, its composition seems to have occupied only a few days,—so few indeed that, in Ecce Homo (p. 118), Nietzsche says he hesitates to give their number; but, in any case, we know it was completed on the 3rd of September in Sils Maria. The manuscript which was dispatched to the printers on the 7th of September bore the title: "Idle Hours of a Psychologist"; this, however, was abandoned in favour of the present title, while the work was going through the press. During September and the early part of October 1888, Nietzsche added to the original contents of the book by inserting the whole section entitled "Things the Germans Lack," and aphorisms 32-43 of "Skirmishes in a War with the Age"; and the book, as it now stands, represents exactly the form in which Nietzsche intended to publish it in the course of the year 1889.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's Philosophy of Action Brian Leiter
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2009 Nietzsche's Philosophy of Action Brian Leiter Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ public_law_and_legal_theory Part of the Law Commons Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere. Recommended Citation Brian Leiter, "Nietzsche's Philosophy of Action" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 270, 2009). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Working Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO. 270 NIETZSCHE’S PHILOSOPHY OF ACTION Brian Leiter THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO July 2009 This paper can be downloaded without charge at the Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html and The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Forthcoming in T. O’Connor & C. Sandis (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy of Action NIETZSCHE Brian Leiter University of Chicago Nietzsche holds that people lack freedom of the will in any sense that would be sufficient for ascriptions of moral responsibility; that the conscious experience we have of willing is actually epiphenomenal with respect to the actions that follow that experience; and that our actions largely arise through non-conscious processes (psychological and physiological) of which we are only dimly aware, and over which we exercise little or no conscious control.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PERSPECTIVE of a NEW PHILOSOPHER • UH-F a Thesis
    THE PERSPECTIVE OF A NEW PHILOSOPHER A Thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of A d s' the requirements for PHIL the Degree • UH-f Master of Arts In Philosophy by Mauricio Arturo Ulloa San Francisco, California August 2015 Copyright by Mauricio Arturo Ulloa 2015 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read THE PERSPECTIVE OF A NEW PHILOSOPHER by Mauricio Arturo Ulloa, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Philosophy at San Francisco State University. Professor of Philosophy cXr^y'7'~ Sandra Luft, Ph.D. Professor of Humanities Abrol Fairweather Ph.D. Adjunct Faculty of Philosophy Department THE PERSPECTIVE OF A NEW PHILOSOPHER Mauricio Arturo Ulloa San Francisco, California 2015 In this paper, I will show why accounts that defend Nietzsche’s perspectivism by reinterpreting him to be more in line with a traditional epistemic theory are mistaken. First, I will compare what Nietzsche calls the old philosopher (traditional philosophers as we know them) and what he calls the new philosopher. Then, I will examine the traditional account of perspectivism as the view that there is no such thing as one universal, truth claim but instead multiple perspectives and explain how it has been defended against its biggest criticism: the paradox of perspectivism. The paradox of perspectivism states that if perspectivism is to be taken seriously it undermines itself as it becomes just another mere perspective and if it is not taken seriously perspectivism is ultimately reduced to relativism.
    [Show full text]