DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix A Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan – Single Issue Silica Sand Review Habitats Regulations Assessment – Test of Likely Significant Effects Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 September 2015 Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan – Single Issue Silica Sand Review Habitats Regulations Assessment – Test of Likely Significant Effects Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 September 2015 Mr T McCabe – Executive Director Community and Environmental Services Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG www.norfolk.gov.uk If you need this document in large print, audio, braille, an alternative format or in a different language please contact Norfolk County Council on 0344 800 8020 or 0344 8008011 (textphone) and we will do our best to help. List of Contents Page Summary S-1 Chapters and Appendices 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations DPD 1-1 1.2 Legislative Framework 1-2 1.3 Scope of Work 1-3 1.4 Methodology 1-4 1.5 Zone of Influence 1-5 1.6 Designated Sites within the Zone of Influence 1-6 1.7 Consultation 1-6 2 Screening Matrix 2-7 3 Summary of Task 1 and Recommendationsfor Task 2 3-1 4 References 6-1 Appendix A Location of the Designated Sites A-1 Appendix B Designated Sites and Qualifying Features B-1 B.1 Ouse Washes SPA B-1 B.2 The Wash SPA B-2 B.3 Norfolk Valley Fens SAC B-4 B.4 Ouse Washes SAC B-6 B.5 Roydon Common and Dersingham Bog SAC B-6 B.6 The Wash and North Norfolk Coast SAC B-7 B.7 Ouse Washes Ramsar B-10 B.8 Roydon Common Ramsar B-11 B.9 The Wash Ramsar B-12 B.10 Dersingham Bog Ramsar B-13 Appendix C Sensitivity of Qualifying Features Analysis C-1 C.1 Sensitivities of the Qualifying Habitats C-1 C.2 Sensitivities of the Qualifying Species – Birds C-8 C.3 Sensitivities of the Qualifying Species – Fish C-23 C.4 Sensitivities of the Qualifying Species – Invertebrates C-23 C.5 Sensitivities of the Qualifying Species – Mammals C-25 i September 2015 Acronyms and Abbreviations AA Appropriate Assessment DPD Development Plan Document EA Environment Agency LDF Local Development Framework NE Natural England RDB Red Data Book RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds SA Sustainability Appraisal SAC Special Area of Conservation SPA Special Protection Area SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest TOLS Test of Likely Significance ZoI Zone of Influence i September 2015 Summary S.1 Background The Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan is produced through the assessment of the proposed specific site put forward by a mineral company, in response to a ‘call for sites’, and defining areas of search within which sites for future silica sand extraction may be granted planning permission in the future. An initial assessment of the proposed specific site and ten areas of search has been carried out against environmental, transport, landscape, heritage, archaeology and amenity constraints. The Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations DPD must be considered in the wider context of the other documents of the Minerals and Waste Local Development Framework (M&W LDF). The ‘Core Strategy and Minerals and Waste Development Management Policies Development Plan Document’ (the ‘Core Strategy’) was adopted in 2011 and sets out the spatial vision for future minerals extraction and associated development and waste management facilities in Norfolk. The Core Strategy contains strategic objectives and policies that will guide where minerals extraction and waste management facilities should and should not occur in Norfolk. Development Management policies will also ensure that development will happen in a sustainable way at those locations assessed as being appropriate for development. The Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan (adopted in 2013) allocated 28 sites for mineral extraction (sand and gravel, carstone and silica sand) in Norfolk during the plan period to 2026. The Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan is planned to be adopted by the end of 2016 and will operate until the end of 2026, with the purpose to plan for mineral extraction in the most sustainable way that minimises potential adverse impacts on amenity and environmental resources. In accordance with Article 6 paragraph (3) of the Council Directive 92/43/EEC) on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (as amended), as transposed into UK law under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended), assessments are required where a plan (or project) not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site may give rise to significant effects upon a Natura 2000 site. The competent authority shall then agree to the plan only after having ascertained that the plan will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned. The objective of this report is to act as a Task 1 screening exercise to identify any likely significant impacts upon the Special Protection Areas (SPA), Special Areas for Conservation (SAC) and Ramsar designated sites. The screening exercise is a high-level review of the potential impacts arising from the implementation of the Silica Sand Review of the Mineral Site Specific Allocations Plan. Only proposed specific sites and areas of search that are reasonably close to European and/or Ramsar designated areas are included in the screening matrix table and assessed. Proposed specific sites and areas of search located more than 5km from the designated site were excluded from the screening exercise, unless otherwise specified in the table, because the potential impacts of silica sand extraction on designated sites are not expected to occur over a distance greater than 5km. S-1 September 2015 Following the detailed review of the potential minerals specific site and areas of search and the formulation of the Task 1 Test of Likely Significance (TOLS) screening matrix, two areas of search have been identified which could potentially result in likely significant effects on European and Ramsar designated sites. Developers wanting to extract silica sand from specific sites or land within an areas of search contained in the Silica Sand Review will still need to apply for and be granted planning permission before mineral extraction can take place. Planning permissions are often granted subject to conditions to mitigate potential adverse impacts from site operations. S.2 Summary and Recommendations for Task 2 Following the detailed review of the proposed specific site and ten areas of search defined for the Silica Sand Review of the Mineral Site Specific Allocations DPD and the formulation of the Task 1 Appropriate Assessment screening, two areas of search have been identified which could potentially result in likely significant effects on European and Ramsar designated sites. These are: The Wash Ramsar: Areas of Search A and B; likely significant effects, alone and in- combination were identified for criterion 5 and 6 of the Ramsar site. The Wash SPA: Areas of Search A and B; likely significant effects, alone and in- combination, were identified for all features of the SPA. The Wash and North Norfolk Coast SAC: Ares of Search A and B; uncertain significant effects, alone and in-combination were identified for all features of the SAC. The remaining designated sites are sufficiently distant from the proposed specific site and defined areas of search so that likely impacts are not considered significant. Nevertheless, best practice should be followed for future silica sand extraction at the proposed site and the areas of search. Based on this assessment Areas of Search A and B, must go through a Task 2 Appropriate Assessment. At this stage, impacts are re-evaluated, a more detailed assessment is conducted and appropriate mitigation measures are proposed, if needed. In addition, it is also recommended: Best practice should be followed at all times. This is most relevant where water dependent habitats are features of the designated sites. Monitoring programmes should be implemented where relevant to ensure that any changes to designated features are identified and preventive measures are implemented as soon as possible, therefore preventing an adverse effect. The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act, the NERC Act (2006), states that public authorities must have regard to the purpose of conserving biodiversity including the restoration or enhancing of a population or habitat. When restoration is one of the objectives of the activity, the conservation objectives of the European site need to be considered where reasonable. In addition, although the sites are located outside the designated sites boundaries, the restoration or enhancing of a population or habitat should be integrated with plans such as the Green Infrastructure Strategy, Biodiversity Action Plans and Norfolk Ecological Networks. S-2 September 2015 1 Introduction 1.1 Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations DPD Silica sand is a nationally important industrial mineral and the primary use for silica sand extraction in Norfolk is glass making. The silica sand resource in Norfolk is found in a relatively narrow band which runs north to south just to the east of King’s Lynn. The northern extent of the silica sand resource is at Heacham and the southern extent around Hilgay. The area of current extraction is centred on the parish of Leziate. A silica sand processing plant is located at Leziate, together with a railhead. The majority of the processed silica sand is transported out of Norfolk by rail. The Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan is produced through the assessment of the proposed specific site put forward by a mineral company, in response to a ‘call for sites’, and defining areas of search within which sites for future silica sand extraction may be granted planning permission in the future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)
    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
    Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations & Policies Document, Wymondham Area Action Plan, Long Stratton Area Action Plan and Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan, undertaken for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Natural Environment Team HRA of Site Allocations Document, Wymondham AAP, Long Stratton AAP and Cringleford Neighbourhood Plan for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations and Policies Document, the Wymondham Area Action Plan, the Long Stratton Area Action Plan and the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan Executive Summary As required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, before deciding to give consent or permission for a plan or project which is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, the competent authority is required to make an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives. This document is a record of the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Sites Allocation Document, undertaken for South Norfolk Council. Additionally, proposed development at Wymondham, as described in the emerging Wymondham Area Action Plan, at Long Stratton, as described in the emerging Long Stratton Area Action Plan and proposed housing in the parish of Cringleford, guided by the emerging Cringleford Draft Neighbourhood Plan, are assessed Three groups of plans are reviewed with respect to their conclusions with respect to potential in-combination effects. These are plans for The Greater Norwich Development Partnership, Great Yarmouth Borough Council, Breckland District Council, and The Broads Authority including local development plans and the Tourism Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017
    Norfolk County Council at your service Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2007-2017 Foreword by Cabinet Member with responsibility for Public Rights of Way Foreword I am pleased to be able to introduce There were an estimated 3.6 billion this Rights of Way Improvement Plan leisure trips to the countryside in for Norfolk 2007 - 2017. It heralds a 2005, with the average spend per trip new era extending opportunities to being £13.38. The estimated total visit the Norfolk countryside to all of value to the rural economy was £9.4 our community. billion. The Norfolk Local Access Forum, the Broads Local Access Forum, and County I see great benefit in the Council aligning Council Officers have contributed to this its major statutory transport planning plan. Significant public involvement was documents on walking, cycling, horse- secured through a consultation campaign; riding, soft-road driving, transport planning Citizens’ Panel research, and direct and health. Again, treating statutory and approaches made to disability, elderly, permissive countryside access like public ethnic, and Sure Start groups. On 20 transport, as part of the wider transport October 2004, a public conference of network, will make opportunities for interested parties discussed both the getting out and about more useful and assessment and proposed objectives. enjoyable. Enhanced management and Norfolk County Council’s countryside awareness should result from more access work has long recognised the people getting involved and sharing breadth of benefits that the service can responsibility. Understanding of the bring. Just three examples:- scope of the Council’s work, and satisfaction with it, should be boosted as Half-an-hour’s walking a day helps to the public gets directly involved in prevent high blood pressure and planning and monitoring progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves
    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walks East Norfolk Coast Introduction
    National Trail 20 Circular Walks East Norfolk Coast Introduction The walks in this guide are designed to make the most of the please be mindful to keep dogs under control and leave gates as natural beauty and cultural heritage of the Norfolk coast. As you find them. companions to stretch one and two of the Norfolk Coast Path (part of the England Coast Path), they are a great way to delve Equipment deeper into this historically and naturally rich area. A wonderful Depending on the weather, some sections of these walks can array of landscapes and habitats await, many of which are be muddy. Even in dry weather, a good pair of walking boots or home to rare wildlife. The architectural landscape is expansive shoes is essential for the longer routes. Norfolk’s climate is drier too. Churches dominate, rarely beaten for height and grandeur than much of the country but unfortunately we can’t guarantee among the peaceful countryside of the coastal region, but sunshine, so packing a waterproof is always a good idea. If you there’s much more to discover. are lucky enough to have the weather on your side, don’t forget From one mile to nine there’s a walk for everyone here, whether sun cream and a hat. you’ve never walked in the countryside before or you’re a Other considerations seasoned rambler. Many of these routes lend themselves well to The walks described in these pages are well signposted on the trail running too. With the Cromer ridge providing the greatest ground, and detailed downloadable maps are available for elevation of anywhere in East Anglia, it’s a great way to get fit as each at www.norfolktrails.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants
    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Marshes to Haddiscoe Dismantled
    This area inspired the artist Sir J. A. Arnesby 16 Yare Valley - Norton Marshes to Brown (1866-1955) who lived each summer Haddiscoe Dismantled Railway at The White House, Haddiscoe. Herald of the Night, Sir J.A.Arnesby-Brown Why is this area special? This is a vast area of largely drained marshland which lies to the south of the Rivers Yare and Waveney. It traditionally formed part of the parishes of Norton (Subcourse), Thurlton, Thorpe and Haddiscoe along with a detached part of Raveningham. It would have had a direct connection to what is now known as Haddiscoe Island, prior to the construction of the New Cut which connected the Yare and Waveney together to avoid having to travel across Breydon Water. There are few houses within this marshland area. Those that exist are confined to those locations 27 where there were, or are transport links across NORFOLK the rivers. The remainder of the settlements have 30 28 developed in a linear way hugging the edges of the southern river valley side. 22 31 23 29 The Haddiscoe Dam road provides the main 24 26 connection north-south from Haddiscoe village to 25 NORWICH St Olaves. 11 20 Gt YARMOUTH 10 12 19 21 A journey on the train line from Norwich to 14 9 Lowestoft which follows the line of the New Cut 13 15 18 16 and then hugs the northern side of the Waveney 17 Valley provides a glorious way to view this area as 8 7 public rights of way into the middle of the marshes LOWESTOFT 6 4 (other than the fully navigable river) are few and 2 3 1 5 far between.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]