DOCSLIB.ORG

11816 Asset Report Wonthella.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WONTHELLA SKATEPARK DRAFT SKATEPARK ASSESSMENT REPORT MARCH 2012 WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS OBJECTIVE 3 WONTHELLA SKATEPARK OVERVIEW 4 SKATEPARK RATING 5 SUMMARY 5 ACTION ITEMS 6 POSSIBLE WORKS 6 LIFE CYCLE 7 RECOMMENDATIONSNSS 8 CONDITION DETAILSETAILS 9 FUNCTION DETAILSETAILS 11 EXAMPLELE PHOTO APPENDIXAPPE 13 EXPLANATIONNATION OF TERMS 19 KEY CRITERIATERIA 20 TERMS - GENERALGEDRAFT ONLY 21 TERMS - PHOTO APPENDIX 22 AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS & OTHER DOCUMENTS 23 DISCLAIMER 25 PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 3 OBJECTIVE THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS TO ASSESS THE CURRENT CONDITION AND FUNCTIONALITY OF THE SKATEPARK AND HIGHLIGHT AREAS OF CONCERN FOR COMMUNITY AND COUNCIL. THIS ASSESSMENT PRODUCES AN OVERALL SCORE THAT ESTIMATES THE SKATEPARKSARKS REMAINING USEFUL LIFE BASEDASED ONO KEY CRITERIA. Assessing the skateparktepark is essential tto: • Defi nee potential liabilities and hazards. • Understandstand its capacity,capacitcapa condition and how longg it is viable.viabv • Develop aDRAFT regregular maintenance ONLY schedule and long term plan for the skatepark to maximise its value as a community asset. The report gives valuable information to stakeholders and will provide guidance and advice on how to reduce risks and capitalise on opportunities where applicable. PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 4 WONTHELLA SKATEPARK OVERVIEW Wonthella Skatepark is locatedlocate on the arranged at the top of the platform and a corner of Eighth And Pass St, Wonthella, level change forming a long grind ledge. WA. The skateparkkatepark borboborders a large There are shade shelters and seating sporting complexmplex withw pools and various dispersed in 2 refuge areas around the ovals south ofDRAFTf the skatepark. parkONLY perimeter. The local community of users consists The following report details our of skateboarders, BMX and scooter observations and recommendations. riders and the 740 ms² skatepark can accommodate about 4 active users at a time(and 20 observers at peak usage). Australind Skatepark has basic amenities. The skatepark has a well spaced fl owing layout of mostly banks and quarter pipes and features a funbox with ledge and transition hips from a bank to quarter pipe into a bowl style corner section. There are a number of square grind rails PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE SHIRE OF GERALDTON WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 5 SKATEPARK RATING This is a summary table detailing how the park scored against a numbermber of kekey criteria of an ideal skatepark would have. The score is comprised of 2 keyy categories: CoCondition and Function which are explained in detail under ‘Explanation of Terms’.Terms’ WONTHELLA SKATEPARK REPORT LY CATEGORY DETAILS SCORECCORORE NNLY RATING COMMENT CONDITION SURFACE SUBTOTALAL 4343 /100 FAIR THE PHYSICAL CONDIͳ TOLERANCE/QUALITYE/QUALITY SUBTOS ͳ ONLYOON TION OF THE PARK TAL 29 /100 FAIR STRUCTURETRUCTURE SUBTOTALSU 31 /100 FAIR SUBTOTAL AFT ONLY103 /300 CONDITIONON TOTAL ΈAΉ 34% FAIR FUNCTIONRRA AMENITIES SUBTOTAL 45 /100 FAIR HOW THE PARKARK CATERSCA OVERALL SKATE DESIGN SUBͳ TO USERS DRDRADRAF TOTAL 72 /100 GOOD SUBTOTAL 117 /200 FUNCTION TOTAL ΈBΉ 58% GOOD RUNNING TOTAL ΈA+BΉ 219 /500 GRAND TOTAL 47% FAIR SUMMARY Overall the skatepark is rated as Fair The need for repairs, renovation or (47%) which means it in the last half renewal to the skatepark will be required of its useful life. Parks in this stage of in the not too distant future. Planning their life cycle require regular inspections and budgeting for this stage should be and maintenances works to ensure they undertaken over the next 5 years. Please remain safe to users over the next 5-10 refer to the Life Cycle Comparison Table. years. PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 6 ACTION ITEMS These items are necessary and urgent repairs to minimise risk to council,, aanand are referred to as ‘Stop Gap Measures’ or Option A in the ‘Possible Works’ Table belowelow REFERENCE NUMBERED UNSAFE ITEMS LOCATION ACTION REQUIREDRE IMAGEI PRIORITYPR TIMING CONCRETE EROSION CLEAN DEBRIS, Y AT PLATFORM BEHIND BEHIND QUARTER PATCHCH HOLES 6ͳ25 LY 1 COPING. WHEEL TRAP PIPE COPING EDGE MMMM ΈHΉ CRITICAL IMMEDIATE STRUCTURAL FAILURE NLYNL TO CONCRETE AT CUTT OUT DAMAGEDDAD PLATFORM BEHIND SECTIONSECOON AND COPING. TRIPPING & BEHIND QUARTER REPLACE WITH 2 STRUCTURAL HAZARD.ARD. PIPEPE COPINGTO EDEDGEEDG APPROVED GROUT ΈFΉ CRITICAL IMMEDIATE LARGE CRACKSRACKS AT TOP OFF BANKED HIP. PLATFORMPLATF EDGE OF CLEAN DEBRIS, TRIPPINGRIPPING AND WHEELAAFAFT BANKEDB HIP NORTH PATCHONLY HOLES 6ͳ25 3 TRAPTRARAPP OF PARK MM ΈAΉ&ΈBΉ CRITICAL IMMEDIATE FILL HOLES WITH FINGERFINGE TRAP AND ENDS OF GRIND APPROVED GROUT, 4 DDRDRAFTSHARP EDGES RAILS GRIND SMOOTH ΈEΉ CRITICAL IMMEDIATE REMOVE SHARP JAGGED HOLES AND COPING OF EDGES FILL HOLES CRACKS TO COPING. QUARTER PIPE NEAR OR REPLACE 5 HIGH RISK TO USERS FUNBOX COPING ΈDΉ CRITICAL IMMEDIATE ENTRY PATHS TO 6 NO SAFETY SIGNAGE SKATEPARK REPLACE SIGNAGE ΈIΉ CRITICAL IMMEDIATE POSSIBLE WORKS APPROX. COST OF OPTION DESCRIPTION RISK TO COUNCIL WORKS LIFE OF WORKSΊYEARS΋ NO REPAIRS LEAVE SKATEPARK AS IS VERY HIGH 00 HIGH, CONSTANT OPTION A STOP GAP MEASURES REPAIRS REQUIRED 15,000 EVERY 1 YEAR OPTION B COPING REPLACEMENT HIGH ͳ MEDIUM 150,000 EVERY 5 YEARS OPTION C NEW PARK LOWͳMEDIUM 370,000 EVERY 20 YEARS PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON 7 10 YEAR LIFEFE CYCLE PROJECTIONION > Y CURRENT RESULTING WONTHELLATH TOTAL COST COUNCIL REMAINING LY SKATEPARK LY OPTION PARK SKATEPARKRK 01 COST BREAKDOWN RISK LIFE LIFE 20122012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 QUALITY REMAINING VERY LIFE 9 NO REPAIRS 0 POOR(25-0) NA 0 NLY NL N NL NL NL NL N NLY HIGH [YEARS] 0 00 WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT REPAIR 000 000 $15,000 EVERY HIGH- OPTION A , , OPTION A $135,000 POOR(25-0) 0 O ON ONLY ONL ON ONL ON ON O ON ON ON ON O ON ON ON O O O O O O O O OPTIONS O YEAR MEDIUM 15 15 15 0 $15,000 $15,000$15,000$15,00 $15,000 $$15,000$, $15,000$$15,000$, $15,000$15,000$15,000$, $15,000$15,0 $15,000$1 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $150,000 ONCE OFF, 000 , POOR- HIGH- OPTION B TO OPTION B $300,000 THEN REPAIRS 0 FAIR(50-25) MEDIUM 150 AFTER 5 $150,000 $150,000$$150 YEARS TO FT F FT FT FT FT F F F F GOOD- $370,000 OPTION C >> OPTION C $370,000 EXCELLENT LOW 10 ONCE OFF (75-100) $370,000 AF A A A A A A A A KEY: END OF LIFE AF LIFE >> REMAINING DRAFT ON DRAFT This table shows the projected life cycle of the Possible Works and the approximate costs over the next 10 This table shows the projected life cycle of the Possible Works years. LIFE CYCLE PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON PREPARED WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 8 RECOMMENDATIONS The table aims to highlight the cost and The community needs for a skatepark life of each repair option over a 10 year should be determined and appropriate period. Note the total cost of Option A & funding be secured to design and B and the outcome after 10 years being construct a new skatepark by an an old park at the end of its life. At that experienced specialist. The process may stage a new facility is inevitably required. include Convic recommend the following actions • Feasibility Study to ensure the money invested in the • Site Selection community has the maximum value over • Communityy consultation its life span: • Design & ConstructioConstruction -Immediate Stop Gap measures on Addressingddressing the ‘Imme‘Immediate’ items on the current skatepark (All points in the Action Action Items tabletabl should minimise the List) in the fi rst year. potential risk of injury at the current site. -Do not keep investing money in this park ConsideringConsONLY the time span of the after this and concentrate fundingndingng on skateparks development process, it is developing a new facility. important to retain a functional skatepark in the community. We recommend keeping -Build new facilityy (The approximate cost the existing skatepark and maintaining it for the designn and constructionconstructio oof a new for the community. The existing skatepark similar sizedzed facility is $370,000)$370, should be demolished once a replacement is completed, as it has reached the end of The design of the cucurrent skatepark is its useful life. fair but its conditionondDRAFT is deteriorating ON quickly and in its current condition poses a signifi cant risk to Council. This does not adequately serve the thriving non structured sports community in Geraldton. PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 9 CONDITION DETAILS The overall condition of the skatepark A is rated at 34%, which means the facility is near the end of its total life based on physical condition. The following stand out as the lowest scoring items for each category: SURFACE (43/100)00)0) The BANK (A) has large crackss inn the surface from an obstacle thathat was removed B There are crackscks and erosion on tthe skateablee surface (B) betweebetween transition pieces. TOLERANCEEDRAFT (29/100) ONLY The tolerance of the coping on the FUNBOX LEDGE (C) QUARTER PIPE (D) is incorrect due to damage, has holes and rust and the surrounding concrete is heavily eroded. As a result, it cannot be used safely by users. C D The GRIND LEDGE (E) has holes and sharp edges exposed on the ends. This is a signifi cant risk to the intended users. E PREPARED BY CONVIC FOR THE CITY OF GERALDTON WONTHELLA SKATEPARK ASSET REPORT 10 STRUCTURE (31/100) F The platform edge of the coping (F) has deteriorated and shows structural concrete failure, causing a signifi cant tripping hazard for skateboard & scooter wheels This also increases the potential of debrisbris covering on the skatepark surface.
Recommended publications
  • 2012 Utfpr Edfis Pdp Alvaro Lui

    2012 Utfpr Edfis Pdp Alvaro Lui

    SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DA EDUCAÇÃO – SEED SUPERINTENDÊNCIA DA EDUCAÇÃO - SUED DIRETORIA DE POLÍTICAS E PROGRAMAS EDUCACIONAIS - DPPE Ficha para identificação da Produção Didático-Pedagógica Professor PDE/2012 Título O skate enquanto fenômeno esportivo, cultural, social e contemporâneo: uma abordagem pedagógica nas aulas de Educação Física no ensino fundamental. Autor Alvaro Luiz Penteado Santos Disciplina/Área Educação Física Escola de Implementação do Projeto Col. Estadual Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco - EFMEPROF e sua localização Município da Escola Pinhais Núcleo Regional de Educação Área Metropolitana Norte Professor Orientador Profº Ms. Carlos Eduardo da Costa Schneider Instituição de Ensino Superior UTFPR Relação Interdisciplinar Artes, História, Geografia, Sociologia, Português. Resumo: O Skate é utilizado nas ruas como forma de lazer e estilo de vida, mas a realidade encontrada na escola é a sua utilização como meio de transporte e muitas vezes o mesmo fica guardado em um canto até o sinal de pegá-lo e voltar para casa. Assim o presente projeto pretende desmistificar os preconceitos ainda existentes em relação aos Esportes Radicais, em especial à modalidade Skate nas aulas de Educação Física no 8º ano período vespertino, dando ênfase aos aspectos contemporâneos que a modalidade enquanto fenômeno esportivo, cultural e social abrange na comunidade local, desta forma articulando a sua prática com as abordagens pedagógicas nas aulas, propiciando uma formação global dos alunos e que constitui num processo digno de formação humana. Caracteriza-se como pesquisa ação, qualitativa e de cunho social. Com a difusão do Skate, é necessário o aprimoramento do conhecimento de suas técnicas de ensino, mais seguras e eficientes, a fim de ampliar as formulações teóricas a este respeito.
  • City of Casey SKATE STRATEGY

    City of Casey SKATE STRATEGY

    Final Report City of Casey SKATE STRATEGY Volume 1Strategies SKATE STRATEGY – FINAL REPORT 14/7/06 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT This Skate and BMX Strategy is presented in two parts: Part 1 – Strategy Part 2 – Consultation findings This document is Part 1 – Strategy. It contains an outline of key issues and directions concerning the provision of skate and BMX facilities in the City. Part 2 – Consultation Findings contains details of the stakeholder consultation and school survey. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sport and Recreation Victoria sponsored this project. @leisure wishes to acknowledge the support and assistance provided by: Richard Amon, Project Manager, City of Casey staff of the City of Casey community groups, participating schools, stores and individuals who made input into this project Also, Tony Hallam of Tony Hallam Skateboarding provided assistance in assessing existing facilities in the City of Casey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, by any means, without the prior written permission of City of Casey and JEAVONS & JEAVONS Pty Ltd. Please refer to page 3 for the document control statement. Rear 534 Mt Alexander Road Ascot Vale Vic 3032 Ph: (03) 9326 1662 Fax: (03) 9326 0991 www.atleisure.com.au CITY OF CASEY 1 SKATE STRATEGY – FINAL REPORT 14/7/06 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................7
  • Klipsun Magazine, 2010, Volume 40, Issue 04-Spring

    Klipsun Magazine, 2010, Volume 40, Issue 04-Spring

    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Klipsun Magazine Western Student Publications Spring 2010 Klipsun Magazine, 2010, Volume 40, Issue 04 - Spring Allison Milton Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/klipsun_magazine Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Milton, Allison, "Klipsun Magazine, 2010, Volume 40, Issue 04 - Spring" (2010). Klipsun Magazine. 251. https://cedar.wwu.edu/klipsun_magazine/251 This Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Student Publications at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Klipsun Magazine by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EDITOR'S NOTE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Allison Milton MANAGING EDITOR Gabrielle Nomura COPY EDITOR Stephanie Castillo STORY EDITORS Megan Brown Amy Sanford JillianVasquez ONLINE EDITOR Kelsey Sampson DESIGNERS Audrey Dubois-Boutet Rebecca Rice Lauren Sauser Dear Reader, PHOTO EDITOR Angelo Spagnolo You may not realize it, or acknowledge it in any way, but you re doing it right now. Your eyes are going LEAD PHOTOGRAPHER from right to left as you read these words. Time is passing, Cejae Thompson the clock is ticking and somewhere in the world, someone is fighting for social justice and maybe even for his or her PHOTOGRAPHERS right to party. Reiko Endo Movement. It s not just a physical action. Of course, Brooke Loisel movement is incorporated into our workouts and daily Rhys Logan routines. We move from one place to another. We move Madeline Stevens up in the professional world. And we even move our hips Skyler Wilder when Shakira tells us they don’t lie.
  • Rhino Skate Parks Tuv Certified to En Standards 2000+ World Wide

    Rhino Skate Parks Tuv Certified to En Standards 2000+ World Wide

    WWW.RHINO-RAMPS.COM ALL RHINO COMPONENTS ARE YEARS RHINO HAS BEEN PRODUCING 100% RECYCLABLE AND PRODUCED WITH FACTS WORLD CLASS SKATE PARKS & NUMBERS 18 100% GREEN ENERGY RHINO SKATE PARKS TUV CERTIFIED TO EN STANDARDS 2000+ WORLD WIDE WORLDS QUITEST RAMPS. YEARS WARRANTY ON RHINOTOP SCIENTIFICALLY TESTED TO A DECIBEL 3 COMPOSITE SKATE SURFACE RATING BELOW AVERAGE OFFICE 12 NOISE 50 DB RHINO IS A MEMBER OF THE CEN/TC COUNTRIES WHERE YOU CAN 136/WG 12 (EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR FIND RHINO SKATE PARKS STANDARDISATION) AND SERVES AS AN 35 EXPERT ADVISOR DEVELOPING NEW EN SAFETY NORMS FOR SKATE PARKS RHINO IS A MEMBER OF SPAUSA SUN PANELS AVOID (SKATE PARK ASSOCIATION OF THE USA) 1050 130.000 KG CO2 PER ANNUM AND WAS THE RECIPIENT OF ITS INNOVATIVE PRODUCT AWARD HPL GROUND CONTACT STRIPS 9 The side panels are supported by 6 mm (1/4”) YOU CAN TRUST HPL strips to allow a good ventilation together COPING with the ventilation holes in the side panels. 2 Hot galvanised 3 mm thick steel tube to grind on. 4 The surface behind this coping is protected with STANLESS STEEL SCREWS a steel grindplate, BMX pegs can not damage the All the screws have a specially designed, double OUR QUALITY surface. asymetric thread. These screws hold 40 % better 7 10 than normal screws and won’t come loose under mechanical pressure. Anti-vandalism heads 6 prevent disassembling. 5 4 GALVANISED STEEL SIDES GALVANISED STEEL EDGE PROTECTIONS Ventilation is designed into every ramp All inclined outside edges are protected by rounded to allow for adequate air flow.
  • Umina Skatepark and Peninsula Recreation Precinct Redevelopment

    Umina Skatepark and Peninsula Recreation Precinct Redevelopment

    UMINA SKATEPARK AND PENINSULA RECREATION PRECINCT REDEVELOPMENT - PHASE FOUR [04] CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT AUGUST 2019 Creative Community Engagement and Activation Consultation & Design | Skatepark Construction | Contract Administration | Project Management A: PO Box 5771 Maroochydore, QLD 4558 | E: [email protected] | W: trinityskateparks.com.au | P: +61 (07) 5314 1114 PRE-DESIGN CONVERSATIONS, DROP-IN SESSIONS & VOTING During Trinity’s site visits to Umina, the Team met with key stakeholders as well as members of the general public. With Council’s assistance, Trinity facilitated drop-in sessions at the skatepark and asked local people to fill out user surveys and take part in a series of voting based exercises to select their preferred features and elements. This was an effective way to draw on local knowledge from members of the community that are directly and indirectly involved or interested in the project. Undertaking this form of engagement enables relationships to be formed with stakeholders as well as provides FIRST ROUND OF COMMUNITY CONSULTATION direct contact with the people who are engrained in the local culture and context of a place. For the first round of consultation, a number of different consultation techniques were SCHOOL BASED WORKSHOPS undertaken within the community and the following methods of consultation were used: Workshops with the local school students at Umina Public School and Brisbane Waters ONLINE SURVEYS Secondary College Woy Woy and Umina campuses were held to: The first round informed The Central Coast Council advertised to the community via print media, sent _ engage with the young and upcoming skate generation and correspondence to 625 local residents and posted on Council’s social media, advising that _ explore design ideas with the current skatepark users and members of the COMMUNITY CONSULTATION multiple consultation sessions would be held for them to ‘have their say’ about this project.
  • Design and Development Guidance for Skateboarding

    Design and Development Guidance for Skateboarding

    Skateboarding Design and Development Guidance for Skateboarding Creating quality spaces and places to skateboard When referring to any documents and associated attachments in this guidance, please note the following:- 1. Reliance upon the guidance or use of the content of this website will constitute your acceptance of these conditions. 2. The term guidance should be taken to imply the standards and best practice solutions that are acceptable to Skateboard England. 3. The documents and any associated drawing material are intended for information only. 4. Amendments, alterations and updates of documents and drawings may take place from time to time and it’s recommended that they are reviewed at the time of use to ensure the most up-to-date versions are being referred to. 5. All downloadable drawings, images and photographs are intended solely to illustrate how elements of a facility can apply Skateboard England’s suggestions and should be read in conjunction with any relevant design guidance, British and European Standards, Health and Safety Legislation and guidance, building regulations, planning and the principles of the Equality Act 2010. 6. The drawings are not ‘site specific’ and are outline proposals. They are not intended for, and should not be used in conjunction with, the procurement of building work, construction, obtaining statutory approvals, or any other services in connection with building works. 7. Whilst every effort is made to ensure accuracy of all information, Skateboard England and its agents, including all parties who have made contributions to any documents or downloadable drawings, shall not be held responsible or be held liable to any third parties in respect of any loss, damage or costs of any nature arising directly or indirectly from reliance placed on this information without prejudice.
  • Vic West Park – Skate Park

    Vic West Park – Skate Park

    Appendix D: Engagement Summary Report: Vic West Skate Park ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY REPORT Vic West Park – Skate Park JUNE 6 – JULY 17, 2015 Appendix D: Engagement Summary Report: Vic West Skate Park Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................3 Engagement Activities In Person Events ............................................................................................ 5 Vic West Street Fest ................................................................................ 5 Vee Dub Sk8 Competition ....................................................................... 6 Ideas Picnic ............................................................................................ 7 Idea Boards .................................................................................................... 9 Surveys Skate Park Survey ................................................................................. 10 General Vic West Park Survey .............................................................. 13 Next Steps .......................................................................................................15 Appendices Appendix 1: Complete Results – Skate Park Survey ................................... 16 Appendix 2: Complete Results – Vic West Park General Survey ................. 76 FOR MORE INFORMATION: City of Victoria E [email protected] T 250.361.0600 1 CENTENNIAL SQUARE, VICTORIA, BC V8W 1P6 | victoria.ca/parks Appendix D: Engagement Summary Report: Vic
  • Tony Hawkʼs Pro Skater 3 Game Design Suggestions Created

    Tony Hawkʼs Pro Skater 3 Game Design Suggestions Created

    Tony Hawkʼs Pro Skater 3 Game Design Suggestions Created: October 2, 2000 Updated: October 3, 2000 Updated: November 7, 2000 Non-Confi dential: Written by Noe Valladolid Friends: Here is an unadulterated look at the Tony Hawkʼs Pro Skater suggestions submitted to Neversoft. Below in three sections are the pages as submitted in chronological order. The fi rst section is the feedback form all of the THPS2 World Finalists were asked to submit after playing through the game. The second section is the follow-up for suggestions I submitted to Neversoft after asking permission to do so. The third section contains the ideas that I missed or wanted to elaborate on. Enjoy, Noe Valladolid SECTION 1 Questionnaire: September, 2000 Thank you for taking the time to fi ll out this questionnaire regarding Tony Hawkʼs Pro Skater 2 and the Big Score Competition. Please fi ll out this questionnaire after you have thoroughly played all the levels in the game and email it back to me or send a hard copy. [email protected] Thanks! Name: Noe Valladolid Age: 25 What other console systems do you own besides PlayStation (highlight appropriate systems): Sega Dreamcast √ Nintendo 64 √ Nintendo Game Boy √ Which console systems do you intend to buy in the upcoming year (highlight desired systems): Sony PlayStation 2 √ Nintendo Game Cube (FKA “Dolphin”) Nintendo Game Boy Advance √ Microsoft X-Box What video games do you like to play (besides THPS 1 & 2)? Grind Session Sonic Adventure Tenchu 1&2 (not just because your Activision) Chrono Cross Crazy Taxi Gran Turismo Grandia Driver Soul Calibur Final Fantasy Tactics Pokémon Gold and Silver Pokémon Stadium Lunar 2 Lunar: Silver Star Parasite Eve Tactics Ogre Twisted Metal 2 Metal Gear Solid THE BIG SCORE COMPETITION This section discusses the THPS 2 Big Score Competition.
  • Skateboarding

    Skateboarding

    Skateboarding Design and Development Guidance for Skateboarding Creating quality spaces and places to skateboard When referring to any documents and associated attachments in this guidance, please note the following:- 1. Reliance upon the guidance or use of the content of this website will constitute your acceptance of these conditions. 2. The term guidance should be taken to imply the standards and best practice solutions that are acceptable to Skateboard GB. 3. The documents and any associated drawing material are intended for information only. 4. Amendments, alterations and updates of documents and drawings may take place from time to time and it’s recommended that they are reviewed at the time of use to ensure the most up-to-date versions are being referred to. 5. All downloadable drawings, images and photographs are intended solely to illustrate how elements of a facility can apply Skateboard GB’s suggestions and should be read in conjunction with any relevant design guidance, British and European Standards, Health and Safety Legislation and guidance, building regulations, planning and the principles of the Equality Act 2010. 6. The drawings are not ‘site specific’ and are outline proposals. They are not intended for, and should not be used in conjunction with, the procurement of building work, construction, obtaining statutory approvals, or any other services in connection with building works. 7. Whilst every effort is made to ensure accuracy of all information, Skateboard GB and its agents, including all parties who have made contributions to any documents or downloadable drawings, shall not be held responsible or be held liable to any third parties in respect of any loss, damage or costs of any nature arising directly or indirectly from reliance placed on this information without prejudice.
  • SKATEBOARD PARK STUDY PHASE 2 - BACKGROUND STUDY Appendix a to Report CES17031 Page 2 of 128

    SKATEBOARD PARK STUDY PHASE 2 - BACKGROUND STUDY Appendix a to Report CES17031 Page 2 of 128

    Appendix A to Report CES17031 Page 1 of 128 FEBRUARY 2017 CITY OF HAMILTON SKATEBOARD PARK STUDY PHASE 2 - BACKGROUND STUDY Appendix A to Report CES17031 Page 2 of 128 Sources: artschoolskateboards - Josh Thomas 2HAMILTON SKATEBOARD PARK STUDY - CITY OF HAMILTON LANDinc & SPECTRUM Appendix A to Report CES17031 Page 3 of 128 CITY OF HAMILTON HAMILTON SKATEBOARD STUDY PHASE 2 – BACKGROUND STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS: SECTION 1. INVENTORY OF SKATEPARKS..........................................................................................................................................04 1.1 Inventory and Site Visits 1.2 Nearby Communities Skate Amenities SECTION 2. SURVEY ..........................................................................................................................................................................17 2.1 Survey Deployment 2.2 Review and Summary of Responses SECTION 3. LOCAL, PROVINCIAL AND NATIONAL SKATEBOARD, SCOOTER AND BMX CULTURE......................................................25 3.1. Local Skateboard Culture 3.2. Ontario Skateboard Culture 3.3. National Skateboard Culture 3.4. BMX Culture 3.5. Scooter Culture SECTION 4. CITY OF HAMILTON POLICY/BY-LAW REVIEW.................................................................................................................26 SECTION 5. TYPES OF SKATE PARKS, HIERARCHIES, AND TYPES OF FEATURES..............................................................................29 5.1. Types of Skateparks 5.2. Hierarchies / Scales of Skateparks 5.3. The
  • Bmx Freestyle Park Guide À L’Attention Des Collectivités Et Clubs

    Bmx Freestyle Park Guide À L’Attention Des Collectivités Et Clubs

    BMX FREESTYLE PARK GUIDE À L’ATTENTION DES COLLECTIVITÉS ET CLUBS ÉDITION 2021 ÉDITO « Le cyclisme est en perpétuelle évolution comme en atteste l’avènement de nouvelles pratiques telles que le Vélo à Assistance Electrique, le VTT sur sable, sur neige ainsi que le BMX Freestyle. Si la pratique du BMX freestyle n’est pas nouvelle en soi, force est de constater qu’elle a changé de braquet depuis plus de trois ans. Conscientes de l’attrait qu’opère le freestyle chez les plus jeunes, l’UCI puis le Comité International Olympique lui ont respectivement ouvert une voie royale en organisant les premiers championnats du Monde de la discipline en 2017 puis en choisissant de l’intégrer au programme des Jeux Olympiques de Tokyo. C’est une révolution et une juste récompense pour une pratique jusqu’ici organisée en marge de toute réglementation et de tout organisme officiel. Cette reconnaissance du freestyle en tant que pratique de haut-niveau lui donnera un écho supplémentaire et participera à son développement. Notre fédération a rapidement pris la mesure de ce mouvement à travers la création, dès 2017, d’un circuit de Coupe de France et d’un premier collectif France. Nous sommes désormais lancés dans un sprint passionnant et plein de défis. Pour la FFC, notre challenge passe par la structuration de la filière et donc la formation d’entraîneurs, la densification du calendrier de compétitions, la mise en place d’un plan de détection à l’échelle nationale et bien sûr la création d’équipements dédiés à cette pratique. C’est le cœur et le socle de toute cette stratégie.
  • Skatepark Expansion Project What We Heard Report – February 2021

    Skatepark Expansion Project What We Heard Report – February 2021

    Skatepark Expansion Project What We Heard Report – February 2021 Project Overview In 2020, the Golden Skateboard Association (GSA) secured funding through the Columbia Basin Trust’s Community Initiatives & Affected Areas Program for the Golden Skatepark Expansion Project. These funds were used to complete the conceptual skatepark and landscape design phase of the project. On February 2, 2021 Town Council voted unanimously to provide a support resolution that approves the land for a skatepark expansion using future grant applications to fund park improvements. For background information and detailed project information, view the Briefing Note here. The Town of Golden assisted the GSA to conduct a public engagement survey to collect feedback on the skatepark expansion concept plan as well as information about the current use of the park. Engagement Overview For this project, the Town and GSA took a ‘Consult’ based approach to public engagement. The IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum level defines ‘Consult’ level of engagement as a goal “to obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives and/or decisions.” This includes a commitment to “inform, listen to and acknowledge concerns, aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced decisions.” Public engagement took place from February 2 to 18, 2021 and worked to achieve the following objective: By Feb. 18, 2021 obtain input from 500 residents and skatepark users on the conceptual skatepark and landscape design for future phases of the project. The information collected is intended to help evaluate the proposed conceptual design, understand the use of the current park, and to inform future grant opportunities and planning for the area.