Breakdown of Species Boundaries in Mandevilla: Floral Morphological
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Revisión De Las Apocinaceas De Argentina Ezcurra, Cecilia 1981
Tesis de Posgrado Revisión de las Apocinaceas de Argentina Ezcurra, Cecilia 1981 Tesis presentada para obtener el grado de Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad de Buenos Aires Este documento forma parte de la colección de tesis doctorales y de maestría de la Biblioteca Central Dr. Luis Federico Leloir, disponible en digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar. Su utilización debe ser acompañada por la cita bibliográfica con reconocimiento de la fuente. This document is part of the doctoral theses collection of the Central Library Dr. Luis Federico Leloir, available in digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar. It should be used accompanied by the corresponding citation acknowledging the source. Cita tipo APA: Ezcurra, Cecilia. (1981). Revisión de las Apocinaceas de Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. http://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/Download/Tesis/Tesis_1687_Ezcurra.pdf Cita tipo Chicago: Ezcurra, Cecilia. "Revisión de las Apocinaceas de Argentina". Tesis de Doctor. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. 1981. http://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/Download/Tesis/Tesis_1687_Ezcurra.pdf Dirección: Biblioteca Central Dr. Luis F. Leloir, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Contacto: [email protected] Intendente Güiraldes 2160 - C1428EGA - Tel. (++54 +11) 4789-9293 REVISION DE LAS APOCINACEAS gg ARGENTINA por Cecilia Ezcurra Trabajo de Tesis para optar al titulo de Doctora en Ciencias Biológicas FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS EXACTAS Y NATURALES UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES lag; LGSI 5. ; 4_ x3 OoOooooI AGRADECIMIENTOS . METODOLOGIA Y MATERIALES . HISTORIA SINOPTICA DE LA FAMILIA Y SUEDIVISIONES DE LA MISMA AFINIDADES CON OTRAS FAMILIAS 'll MORFOLOGIA . -
Pollinator Adaptation and the Evolution of Floral Nectar Sugar
doi: 10.1111/jeb.12991 Pollinator adaptation and the evolution of floral nectar sugar composition S. ABRAHAMCZYK*, M. KESSLER†,D.HANLEY‡,D.N.KARGER†,M.P.J.MULLER€ †, A. C. KNAUER†,F.KELLER§, M. SCHWERDTFEGER¶ &A.M.HUMPHREYS**†† *Nees Institute for Plant Biodiversity, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany †Institute of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ‡Department of Biology, Long Island University - Post, Brookville, NY, USA §Institute of Plant Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ¶Albrecht-v.-Haller Institute of Plant Science, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany **Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK ††Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden Keywords: Abstract asterids; A long-standing debate concerns whether nectar sugar composition evolves fructose; as an adaptation to pollinator dietary requirements or whether it is ‘phylo- glucose; genetically constrained’. Here, we use a modelling approach to evaluate the phylogenetic conservatism; hypothesis that nectar sucrose proportion (NSP) is an adaptation to pollina- phylogenetic constraint; tors. We analyse ~ 2100 species of asterids, spanning several plant families pollination syndrome; and pollinator groups (PGs), and show that the hypothesis of adaptation sucrose. cannot be rejected: NSP evolves towards two optimal values, high NSP for specialist-pollinated and low NSP for generalist-pollinated plants. However, the inferred adaptive process is weak, suggesting that adaptation to PG only provides a partial explanation for how nectar evolves. Additional factors are therefore needed to fully explain nectar evolution, and we suggest that future studies might incorporate floral shape and size and the abiotic envi- ronment into the analytical framework. -
KHADIR MOHIDEENCOLLEGE (Nationally Accredited with B by NAAC) ADIRAMPATTINAM – 614 701, TAMIL NADU, INDIA
AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF FLORICULTURE IN THANJAVUR DISTRICT Thesis submitted to Bharathidasan University for the award of the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ECONOMICS By A. AHILANDESWARI Under the Guidance of Dr. Mrs. N. CHITHRA ,M.A, M.Phil., Ph.D., P.G. AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS KHADIR MOHIDEENCOLLEGE (Nationally accredited with B by NAAC) ADIRAMPATTINAM – 614 701, TAMIL NADU, INDIA SEPTEMBER - 2014 Certificate P.G. AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS KHADIRMOHIDEENCOLLEGE ADIRAMPATTINAM Dr. Mrs. N. CHITHRA, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Associate Professor& Research Advisor, CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF FLORICULTURE IN THANJAVUR DISTRICT ” submitted by A.AHILANDESWARI (Reg.No. 48091/Ph.D2/Economics/Full Time/April 2012 ) is a bonafide record of research work done by her under my guidance in the Department of Economics, Khadir Mohideen College, Adirampattinam and that the thesis has not previously formed the basis for the award of any degree or any other similar title. The thesis is the outcome of personal research work done by the candidate under my overall supervision. Date: (N. CHITHRA) Station: Declaration A. AHILANDESWARI Reg.No. 48091/Ph.D2/Economics/Full Time/April 2012 Research Scholar (Full Time), PG and Research Department of Economics, Khadir Mohideen College, Adirampattinam. DECLARATION I hereby declare that the thesis “AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF FLORICULTURE IN THANJAVUR DISTRICT” submitted by me for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics to the Bharathidasan University under the guidance and supervision of Dr.N.CHITHRA, Associate Professor of Economics and Research Advisor, PG and Research Department of Economics, Khadir Mohideen College, Adirampattinam is the Record of work done by me. -
IS MANDEVILLA (APOCYNACEAE, MESECHITEAE) MONOPHYLETIC? EVIDENCE from FIVE PLASTID DNA LOCI and MORPHOLOGY Author(S): André O
IS MANDEVILLA (APOCYNACEAE, MESECHITEAE) MONOPHYLETIC? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE PLASTID DNA LOCI AND MORPHOLOGY Author(s): André O. Simões , Mary E. Endress , Timotheüs van der Niet , Luiza S. Kinoshita , and Elena Conti Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 93(4):565-591. 2006. Published By: Missouri Botanical Garden DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3417/0026-6493(2006)93[565:IMAMME]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/ full/10.3417/0026-6493%282006%2993%5B565%3AIMAMME%5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. IS MANDEVILLA (APOCYNACEAE, Andre´ O. Simo˜es,2 Mary E. Endress,3 MESECHITEAE) Timotheu¨s van der Niet,3 Luiza S. Kinoshita,4 -
Import and Release the Moth Plant Rust Fungus, Puccinia Araujiae, As a Biocontrol Agent for the Weed Moth Plant
Staff Assessment Report APP202529: import and release the moth plant rust fungus, Puccinia araujiae, as a biocontrol agent for the weed moth plant 23 October 2015 Purpose An application to import and release the moth plant rust fungus, Puccinia araujiae, as a biocontrol agent for the weed moth plant, Araujia hortorum Application number APP202529 Application type To obtain approval to release new organisms Applicant Northland Regional Council Date formally received 17 August 2015 2 EPA advice for application APP202529 Executive Summary and Recommendation In August 2015, Northland Regional Council made an application to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) seeking to introduce the moth plant rust fungus (Puccinia araujiae) as a biological control agent for the weed moth plant (Araujia hortorum). We examined the beneficial and adverse effects to the environment, market economy, and society and communities, in addition to the effects on Māori and their relationship to the environment in our assessment of the application. The applicant presented evidence to show that the moth plant rust fungus will not infect native New Zealand species based on taxonomic analysis and safety testing conducted in quarantine. New Zealand jasmine (Parsonsia spp.) is the only native plant that is in the same family as moth plant but it belongs to a different sub-family. Host range testing showed that moth plant rust only attacks plants in the sub-tribe to which moth plant belongs, therefore, New Zealand jasmine is not considered susceptible to the rust. The moth plant rust may attack the exotic ornamental species tweedia since it is in the same sub-tribe as moth plant. -
APP201039 APP201039 Application Final.Pdf(PDF, 1.4
Application to R elease a new organism without controls That is not a genetically modified organism BP House 20 Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04-916 2426 Fax: 04-914 0433 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ermannz.govt.nz Publication number 122/01 Please note This application form covers the import for release, or release from containment any new organism that is not a genetically modified organism under s34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act. This form may be used to seek approvals for more than one organism where the organisms are of a similar nature with similar risk profiles. Do not use this form for genetically modified organisms. If you want to release a genetically modified organism please use the form entitled Application to release a genetically modified organism without controls. This is the approved form for the purposes of the HSNO Act and replaces all other previous versions. Any extra material that does not fit in the application form must be clearly labelled, cross-referenced and included as appendices to the application form. Confidential information must be collated in a separate appendix. You must justify why you consider the material confidential and make sure it is clearly labelled as such. If technical terms are used in the application form, explain these terms in plain language in the Glossary (Section 6 of this application form). You must sign the application form and enclose the application fee (including GST). ERMA New Zealand will not process applications that are not accompanied by the correct application fee. -
Host Range Testing of Freudeita Cf. Cupripennis
The host range of Freudeita cf. cupripennis, a biological control agent for moth plant, Araujia hortorum Zane McGrath, Quentin Paynter, Arnaud Cartier, Hugh Gourlay, Richard Hill Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland 1076 Summary The host range of the moth plant beetle was determined in laboratory tests. Moth plant beetles were sourced from Melilla, Uruguay. Experiments conducted in the Landcare Research containment facility at Auckland, New Zealand tested 10 plant species related to moth plant in the family Apocynaceae. Newly‐emerged adult beetles fed heavily on the foliage of moth plant controls and on Oxypetalum caeruleum. The foliage of other test plants was not significantly affected. Females lay eggs at the base of plants on which they feed. It is unlikely that females would lay eggs on any species other than moth plant and O. caeruleum Newly‐hatched larvae placed on the surface of the soil of potted plants of O. caeruleum and moth plant controls colonised the roots and substantially completed development. Larvae placed on the soil surface over the roots of the other plant species tested did not survive, except for two atypical larvae on the roots of Hoya carnosa, which might be contaminants. The risk of larval development on non‐target plants other than O. caeruleum is insignificant. Oxypetalum caeruleum is closely related to moth plant in the sub‐tribe Oxypetalinae. Tests indicate that it is a fundamental host of the moth plant beetle population from Uruguay and could be at risk in New Zealand. There is no evidence that plants belonging to the Apocynaceae but outside the sub‐tribe Oxypetalinae could be used by F. -
Native and Exotic Flora of the North Western Slopes Upstream of the Junction of the Peel and Namoi Rivers, New South Wales
721 Native and exotic flora of the North Western Slopes upstream of the junction of the Peel and Namoi Rivers, New South Wales J.R. Hosking and T.A. James Hosking1, J.R. and T.A. James2 (1 NSW Agriculture and CRC for Weed Management Systems, RMB 944, Tamworth, NSW 2340; 2National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, NSW 2000) 1998. Native and exotic flora of the North Western Slopes upstream of the junction of the Peel and Namoi Rivers, New South Wales. Cunninghamia 5(3): 721–766. The area covered by this study is in the North Western Slopes botanical subdivision of New South Wales, upstream of the junction of the Peel and Namoi Rivers (between 30°16'S and 31°35'S and 150°21'E and 151°22'E). Detailed surveys were carried out in eight areas on a range of soils. A total of 1041 taxa (1016 species) were recorded (639 native to the area, 8 Australian but not native to the area, 394 exotic and naturalised). Data were analysed to provide relative proportions of native and exotic plant taxa in relation to plant groups, plant families, survey sites, and life-form and life-cycle attributes. A high proportion of exotic taxa (38%) was recorded, particularly in the plant families Poaceae, Asteraceae and Fabaceae, reflecting a long history of settlement and agriculture in the region. A diversity of life-forms was represented but overall the taxa were predominantly forbs, grasses or grass-like plants. The area around Woodsreef asbestos mine and an area east of Chaffey Dam contained a number of native species that appeared to be restricted to serpentinite areas. -
Ornamental Plant Diversity of the Family Apocynaceae In
Arom OPEN ACCESS Freely available online & at al ic in P l ic a n d t e s M Medicinal & Aromatic Plants ISSN: 2167-0412 Research Article Ornamental Plant Diversity of the Family Apocynaceae in Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India Rejitha S1*, Uma Devi S2 1Department of Botany, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Marthandam, Tamil Nadu, India; 2Department of Botany, Sree Ayyappa College for Women, Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu, India ABSTRACT The present study highlights the diversity study of ornamental flowering plants in Apocynaceae family, which are documented from Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India. We have identified 29 species belonging to 19 genera is used as decorative potentialities, of these flora are highlighted due to its appealing addiction and accurate searching plants. The present study suggested that this work will help the researchers and people who are interested in ornamental plants. Keywords: Apocynaceae; Ornamental; Kanyakumari district INTRODUCTION group of plants, including both native and alien species, which are extremely variable in terms of their life form and cultivation needs. Angiosperms, the dominating group of flowering plants in the They form an important component of the human environment, present world are further expanding with the unending addition of because they are grown in a broad spectrum of habitats such as newer taxa, one of the reasons possibly being the critical evaluation gardens, public spaces (e.g. town squares or cemeteries), indoors and exploration of the existing biota. India is blessed by nature (as houseplants), open land (e.g. in belts along roads), floriculture with one of the richest floras on the earth and is considered as the plantations and specialist garden collections [5]. -
Lausd Approved Plant List
L.A.U.S.D. APPROVED PLANT LIST - TREES Climate Climate Sunset Botanical Name Common Name CA Native Deciduous, Semi Evergreen, Height x Width (feet) L.A. City ParKway Size (feet) L.A. Zones Water Use: LA Basin Climate Zones 22-24 Water Use: Inland Climate Zones 18-21 Needs Sun Needs Soil Root Damage Potential Allergy Potential (1 Low to 10 High) Branch Strength Notes 20-40 x Tolerates seasonal flooding. Heavy leaf Acacia stenophylla Shoestring acacia E 15-25 - 18-24 L L S-P C,L,S M 10 W litter. Light shade. 30-70 x S- 10-12" leaves, yellow-brown in fall. Thrives Acer macrophyllum Big leaf maple x D 30-50 8+ 18-24 M H Sh L,S H 8 M in cool, moist locations. Afrocarpus falcatus 40-60 x WD m9, Very little leaf litter. Pest and disease free. (Podocarpus gracilior) Fern pine E 25-40 6-8 18-24 M M S-P C,L,S L f1 M Prefers moist soil. 25-40 x Peppermint-scent weeping leaves. White Agonis flexuosa Peppermint tree E 25-40 4-6 19-24 L L S-P C,L,S M 6 S flowers. Likes moist sandy soil. Agonis flexuosa After Dark peppermint 15-20 x Dark purple leaves that are more narrow 'Jervis Bay After Dark' tree E 10-15 4-6 19-24 L L S-P C,L,S L-M 6 S than A. flexuosa; red stems. 20-40 x Pink, fluffy flowers; ferny leaves; umbrella Albizia julibrissin Silk tree D 20-50 4-6 18-23 L L S-P C,L,S M 8 W canopy. -
Canterbury Naturalised Vascular Plant Checklist
Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist JUNE 2007 Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist D.J. Mahon JUNE 2007 Published by Canterbury Conservancy Department of Conservation Private Bag 4715 Christchurch 8140 Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist Cover: Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) Photo: D.J. Mahon © Copyright June 2007 New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN: 978-0-478-14214-3 ISBN: 978-0-478-14214-0 (PDF) Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist CONTENTS Summary 1 Definition of Canterbury 1 Taxa included in the list 2 Assessment of Canterbury distribution 2 Additional information included in the list 3 Summary statistics 4 Limitations 6 Excluded taxa 7 Canterbury range extensions of fully naturalised taxa 11 Canterbury casual range extensions of taxa fully naturalised in New Zealand 16 Canterbury range extensions of minor and zeta records (casual taxa) 26 Acknowledgements 29 References 29 Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist 31 Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist Canterbury naturalised vascular plant checklist SUMMARY This checklist presents the naturalised vascular plants of Canterbury (1366 taxa). Taxa were drawn from the New Zealand Naturalised Vascu- lar Plant Checklist (Howell & Sawyer 2006) which includes all adventive taxa published as wild in New Zealand prior to December 2005. The checklist provides citations to the publication of wild status for each taxa and in some cases additional supporting references to herbarium accessions are included. A number of taxa collected wild in Canterbury have not had Canterbury included in their previously published range. This is addressed through the presentation of range extensions for 89 taxa. DEFINITION OF CANTERBURY The definition of Canterbury used in this publication is the traditional Canterbury Land District, as used in the Flora of New Zealand series, shown in Figure 1. -
WRA Species Report
Family: Apocynaceae Taxon: Mandevilla boliviensis Synonym: Dipladenia boliviensis Hook. f. (basionym) Common Name: white dipladenia white mandevilla Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: EVALUATE Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 1 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 405 Toxic to animals