DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 10/Friday, January 15, 2021/Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 10/Friday, January 15, 2021/Rules Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 3769 Adjusted maximum civil Law Penalty description penalty amount 12 U.S.C. 5565(c)(2)(A) ............................................................. Tier 1 penalty ............................................................................. $5,953 12 U.S.C. 5565(c)(2)(B) ............................................................. Tier 2 penalty ............................................................................. 29,764 12 U.S.C. 5565(c)(2)(C) ............................................................. Tier 3 penalty ............................................................................. 1,190,546 15 U.S.C. 1717a(a)(2) ................................................................ Per violation ................................................................................ 2,074 15 U.S.C. 1717a(a)(2) ................................................................ Annual cap ................................................................................. 2,073,133 12 U.S.C. 2609(d)(1) .................................................................. Per failure ................................................................................... 97 12 U.S.C. 2609(d)(1) .................................................................. Annual cap ................................................................................. 195,047 12 U.S.C. 2609(d)(2)(A) ............................................................. Per failure, where intentional ...................................................... 195 12 U.S.C. 5113(d)(2) .................................................................. Per violation ................................................................................ 30,058 15 U.S.C. 1639e(k)(1) ................................................................ First violation .............................................................................. 11,906 15 U.S.C. 1639e(k)(2) ................................................................ Subsequent violations ................................................................ 23,811 (b) The adjustments in paragraph (a) DATES: This AD is effective February 16, apply to certain Piper Models PA–28– of this section shall apply to civil 2021. 140, PA–28–150, PA–28–151, PA–28– penalties assessed after January 15, The Director of the Federal Register 160, PA–28–161, PA–28–180, PA–28– 2021, whose associated violations approved the incorporation by reference 181, PA–28–235, PA–28R–180, PA– occurred on or after November 2, 2015. of a certain publication listed in this AD 28R–200, PA–28R–201, PA–28R–201T, Dated: January 12, 2021. as of February 16, 2021. PA–28RT–201, PA–28RT–201T, PA–32– 260, and PA–32–300 airplanes. The Grace Feola, ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact NPRM published in the Federal Federal Register Liaison, Bureau of Consumer Register on December 21, 2018 (83 FR Financial Protection. Piper Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, 65592). The NPRM was prompted by a [FR Doc. 2021–00925 Filed 1–14–21; 8:45 am] Vero Beach, Florida 32960; phone: (772) 567–4361; website: https:// fatal accident involving wing separation BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P www.piper.com. You may view this on a Piper Model PA–28R–201 airplane. service information at the FAA, An investigation revealed a fatigue crack Airworthiness Products Section, in a visually inaccessible area of the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, lower main wing spar cap. The NPRM included other model airplanes with Federal Aviation Administration Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this similar wing spar structures as the Model PA–28R–201. Based on airplane 14 CFR Part 39 material at the FAA, call (816) 329– 4148. It is also available at https:// usage history, the FAA determined that [Docket No. FAA–2018–1046; Product www.regulations.gov by searching for only those airplanes with higher risk for Identifier 2018–CE–049–AD; Amendment and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– fatigue cracks (airplanes with a 39–21371; AD 2020–26–16] 1046. significant history of operation in flight training or other high-load RIN 2120–AA64 Examining the AD Docket environments) should be subject to the Airworthiness Directives; Piper You may examine the AD docket at inspection requirements proposed in the Aircraft, Inc. Airplanes https://www.regulations.gov by NPRM. searching for and locating Docket No. Because airplanes used in training AGENCY: Federal Aviation FAA–2018–1046; or in person at Docket and other high-load environments are Administration (FAA), DOT. Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., typically operated for hire and have ACTION: Final rule. Monday through Friday, except Federal inspection programs that require 100- holidays. The AD docket contains this hour inspections, the FAA determined SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new final rule, any comments received, and the number of 100-hour inspections an airworthiness directive (AD) for certain other information. The address for airplane has undergone would be the Piper Aircraft, Inc. (Piper) Models PA– Docket Operations is U.S. Department of best indicator of the airplane’s usage 28–151, PA–28–161, PA–28–181, PA– Transportation, Docket Operations, M– history. Accordingly, the FAA 28–235, PA–28R–180, PA–28R–200, 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room developed a factored service hours PA–28R–201, PA–28R–201T, PA–28RT– W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, formula based on the number of 100- 201, PA–28RT–201T, PA–32–260, PA– Washington, DC 20590. hour inspections completed on the 32–300, PA–32R–300, PA–32RT–300, airplane. and PA–32RT–300T airplanes. This AD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to was prompted by a report of a wing McCully, Aviation Safety Engineer, require a review of the airplane separation caused by fatigue cracking in Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701 maintenance records to determine the a visually inaccessible area of the lower Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia number of 100-hour inspections and the main wing spar cap. This AD requires 30337; phone: (404) 474–5548; fax: (404) application of the factored service hours calculating the factored service hours 474–5605; email: william.mccully@ formula to identify when an airplane for each main wing spar to determine faa.gov. meets the criteria for the proposed eddy when an inspection is required, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: current inspection of the lower main inspecting the lower main wing spar wing spar bolt holes. The FAA also bolt holes for cracks, and replacing any Background proposed to require inspecting the lower cracked main wing spar. The FAA is The FAA issued a notice of proposed main wing spar bolt holes for cracks issuing this AD to address the unsafe rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR once a main wing spar exceeds the condition on these products. part 39 by adding an AD that would specified factored service hours and VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:59 Jan 14, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM 15JAR1 3770 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2021 / Rules and Regulations replacing any main wing spar when a included Piper, governmental agencies wing separations at the outboard bolt crack is indicated. The maintenance such as the National Transportation holes of the lower spar cap. The NTSB records review to determine the factored Safety Board (NTSB) and the Civil Metallurgist’s Factual Report in the service hours proposed in the NPRM Aviation Safety Authority of Australia 1987 accident, Materials Laboratory would only apply when an airplane has (CASA), and organizations such as the Report No. 87–89, dated August 17, either accumulated 5,000 or more hours Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association 1987, found that fatigue had initiated at time-in-service (TIS); has had either (AOPA), the General Aviation and two locations on the lower surface of the main wing spar replaced with a Manufacturer’s Association (GAMA), left wing spar cap near the forward most serviceable (more than zero hours TIS) the Experimental Aircraft Association outboard, spar to carry through, bolt main wing spar; or has missing and/or (EAA), and the Piper Flying hole. The report further found the incomplete maintenance records. Association. The following presents the fatigue had propagated completely The FAA issued a supplemental comments received on the SNPRM and through the forward flange and partially notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) the FAA’s response to each comment. into the aft flange and spar web.2 The to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an A. Supportive Comments Metallurgist’s Factual Report in the AD that would apply to certain Piper 1993 accident, Report No. 93–34, dated Models PA–28–151, PA–28–181, PA– The NTSB and two individual December 15, 1993, found that the lower 28–235, PA–28R–180, PA–28R–200, commenters supported the AD without cap was fractured through the most PA–28R–201, PA–28R–201T, PA–28RT– any recommended changes. Three other outboard pair of bolts connecting the 201, PA–28RT–201T, PA–32–260, PA– individual commenters supported the spar and carry-through.3 The FAA notes 32–300, PA–32R–300, PA–32RT–300, AD but requested changes discussed that the NTSB Final Report for the 1993 and PA–32RT–300T airplanes. The below. accident states the investigation could SNPRM published in the Federal B. Requests for Additional Information not
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Certificated Aircraft Engines
    CERTIFICATED AIRCRAFT ENGINES SSP­110­1 DECEMBER 2013 652 Oliver Street Williamsport, PA 17701 U.S.A. Phone: Main OfficeU.S. and Canada Toll Free +1 (800) 258­3279 Direct +1 (570) 323­6181 Sales Department +1 (570) 327­7278 Facsimile +1 (570) 327­7101 Visit us on the World Wide Web at: http://www.lycoming.com ©2013 Avco Corporation All Rights Reserved. Lycoming Engines is a division of Avco Corporation. TABLE OF CONTENTS PISTON CERTIFICATED ENGINES – (4) Four Cylinder Series ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 (6) Six Cylinder Series ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 (8) Eight Cylinder Series .................................................................................................................................................... 32 PISTON ENGINE INSTALLATIONS (4) Four Cylinder Installations............................................................................................................................................ 33 (6) Six Cylinder Installations.............................................................................................................................................. 42 TURBOCHARGED .................................................................................................................................................... 46 GEARED...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PA46-350P Pilot's Operating Handbook
    MALIBU MIRAGE MALIBU MIRAGE PA-46-350P PA-46-350P SN 4636196 AND UP SN 4636196 AND UP PILOT’S PILOT’S OPERATING OPERATING HANDBOOK HANDBOOK AND AND FAA APPROVED FAA APPROVED AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL AIRPLANE AIRPLANE AIRPLANE AIRPLANE SERIAL NO. ___________________________ REGIST. NO. _______________________ SERIAL NO. ___________________________ REGIST. NO. _______________________ PA-46-350P PA-46-350P REPORT: VB-1710 FAA APPROVED BY: REPORT: VB-1710 FAA APPROVED BY: PETER E. PECK FOR REFERENCEPETER E. PECK ONLY D.O.A. NO. SO-1 D.O.A. NO. SO-1 DATE OF APPROVAL: THE NEW PIPER AIRCRAFT, INC. DATE OF APPROVAL:NOT FOR FLIGHT THE NEW PIPER AIRCRAFT, INC. FEBRUARY 23, 1999 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 23, 1999 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA THIS HANDBOOK INCLUDES THE MATERIAL REQUIRED TO BE FURNISHED TO THE THIS HANDBOOK INCLUDES THE MATERIAL REQUIRED TO BE FURNISHED TO THE PILOT BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PILOT BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER AND CONSTITUTES THE FAA APPROVED PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER AND CONSTITUTES THE FAA APPROVED AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL. THIS HANDBOOK MUST BE CARRIED IN THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL. THIS HANDBOOK MUST BE CARRIED IN THE AIRPLANE AT ALL TIMES. AIRPLANE AT ALL TIMES. TM TM WARNING WARNING EXTREME CARE MUST BE EXERCISED TO LIMIT THE EXTREME CARE MUST BE EXERCISED TO LIMIT THE USE OF THIS HANDBOOK TO APPLICABLE AIRCRAFT. USE OF THIS HANDBOOK TO APPLICABLE AIRCRAFT. THIS HAND- BOOK IS VALID FOR USE WITH THE THIS HAND- BOOK IS VALID FOR USE WITH THE AIRPLANE IDENTIFIED ON THE FACE OF THE TITLE AIRPLANE IDENTIFIED ON THE FACE OF THE TITLE PAGE.
    [Show full text]
  • WINGS of SILVER PIPER J-3 Cub OPERATIONS MANUAL &
    WINGS OF SILVER PIPER J-3 Cub OPERATIONS MANUAL & POH (this Manual and POH is not intended for flight and is intended only for flight simulation use) Written by Mitchell Glicksman, © 2009 i Table of Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The 747 Captain Who Forgot How to Fly................................................................................................................................................................8 A Short History of a Small Airplane......................................................................................................................................................................13 Quick Start Guide...................................................................................................................................................................................................18 System Requirements........................................................................................................................................................................................18 Installation.........................................................................................................................................................................................................20 Settings..............................................................................................................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Garmin Reveals Autoland Feature Rotorcraft Industry Slams Possible by Matt Thurber NYC Helo Ban Page 45
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.50 | No.12 $9.00 DECEMBER 2019 | ainonline.com Flying Short-field landings in the Falcon 8X page 24 Regulations UK Labour calls for bizjet ban page 14 Industry Forecast sees deliveries rise in 2020 page 36 Gratitude for Service Honor flight brings vets to D.C. page 41 Air Transport Lion Air report cites multiple failures page 51 Rotorcraft Garmin reveals Autoland feature Industry slams possible by Matt Thurber NYC helo ban page 45 For the past eight years, Garmin has secretly Mode. The Autoland system is designed to Autoland and how it works, I visited been working on a fascinating new capabil- safely fly an airplane from cruising altitude Garmin’s Olathe, Kansas, headquarters for ity, an autoland function that can rescue an to a suitable runway, then land the airplane, a briefing and demo flight in the M600 with airplane with an incapacitated pilot or save apply brakes, and stop the engine. Autoland flight test pilot and engineer Eric Sargent. a pilot when weather conditions present can even switch on anti-/deicing systems if The project began in 2011 with a Garmin no other safe option. Autoland should soon necessary. engineer testing some algorithms that could receive its first FAA approval, with certifi- Autoland is available for aircraft manu- make an autolanding possible, and in 2014 cation expected shortly in the Piper M600, facturers to incorporate in their airplanes Garmin accomplished a first autolanding in followed by the Cirrus Vision Jet. equipped with Garmin G3000 avionics and a Columbia 400 piston single. In September The Garmin Autoland system is part of autothrottle.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS RELEASE Continental Aerospace Technologies
    NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release Continental Aerospace Technologies™ announces partnership with Piper Aircraft® to launch the Pilot 100 training aircraft Mobile, Alabama, April 2, 2019 — Continental®, an AVIC International Holding (HK) LTD company (HKEX: 232.HK), announces the partnership with Piper Aircraft® to launch the Pilot 100 and Pilot 100i training aircraft. Piper Aircraft® has selected the certified Continental IO-370-DA3A engine for the new Pilot 100/100i single engine trainer. After careful consideration, Piper® determined that the engine met their requirements to answer increasing requests from flight schools of all sizes for a robust, proven trainer platform at a lower price point in both VFR and IFR configurations With an all-time high demand for new pilots, Piper Aircraft® has announced the Pilot 100/100i, to meet the needs of a wide variety of training schools and curriculums. Based on the PA-28 airframe, one of the most successful training platforms in the history of general aviation, Piper® combined an airframe, avionics and engine package that allows the aircraft to be very aggressively priced and fills the need for a trainer tailored to the primary single- engine training needs of these schools. The Pilot 100/100i allows schools to invest in new initial trainers at a price point that is compatible with their needs while relying on a proven and tried design. “We congratulate Piper Aircraft® for their vision, ability to gauge the market trends, and their commitment to the training market. We are very excited to collaborate with Piper® on the new certified engine design. We worked with the Piper® engineering team to make sure that they benefit not only from an outstanding value, but also from all the enhancements that we have incorporated in our new engine line.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Specification No. A-691
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION A-691 Revision 32 PIPER J3C-40 J3C-50 J3C-50S J3C-65 J3C-65S PA-11 PA-11S October 1, 1997 AIRCRAFT SPECIFICATION NO. A-691 Type Certificate Holder The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. 2926 Piper Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 I - Model J3C-40, 2 PCLM, Approved July 14, 1938. Engine Continental A-40-4 (See Item 311A for optional engine) Fuel 73 minimum octane aviation gasoline Engine Limits For all operations, 2575 r.p.m. (40 hp) Airspeed Limits (CAS) Level flight or climb 85 mph ( 74 knots) Glide or dive 115 mph (100 knots) Propeller Limits Maximum permissible diameter 81 inches C. G. Range (+10.6) to (+22.7) See NOTE 3 for restricted limits on certain Serial Nos. below 4502. Empty Weight C. G. Range If placard "Solo flying in rear seat only" is installed (See NOTE 2): (+7.8) to (+20.0) When empty weight C. G. falls within range given, computation of critical fore and aft C. G. positions is unnecessary. Range is not valid for non-standard arrangements. Maximum Weight 1025 lb. Number of Seats 2 (one at +9 and one at +36) Maximum Baggage 20 lb. (+49) Fuel Capacity 12 gallons (-18) Oil Capacity 1 gallon (-39) Page No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Rev. No. 32 31 31 31 31 31 31 32 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 A-691 Page 2 of 21 I - Model J3C-40 (cont'd) Control Surface Movements Elevator 34° Up 29° Down Rudder 30° Left 30° Right Aileron 18° Up 18° Down Stabilizer 2.5° Up 4° Down Serial Numbers Eligible 2325, 2327, 2339, 2340, 2342, 2344, 2345, 2347, 2349, 2351 and up; 2356-A and up; and 8277-1 through 8277-40.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Cub Clues Newsletters #1 - #183 • December 2014
    Index to Cub Clues Newsletters #1 - #183 • December 2014 Articles, Books, Videos about Cubs or Pipers...............................................................1 FAA - Rules & Procedures........................................................................................1-2 Flying - Places to Go/Noteworthy Flights .................................................................2-3 Flying Techniques - Including Aerobatics.....................................................................3 Fuel & Oil................................................................................................................3-4 Hangaring, Towing, Pushing, Lifting, Tying Down ........................................................4 History - Aircraft Exploits ...........................................................................................4 History - Company ..................................................................................................4-5 History - War Time……………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Maintenance, Repair, Alteration ...........................................................................5-21 Cockpit - doors, windows, floors..................................................................5-6 Cockpit - seat belts, harnesses........................................................................6 Cockpit - seat, upholstery, baggage area.........................................................6 Controls & control surfaces .........................................................................6-7 Converting
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Issue the PIPER
    Vol 63, No. 3 Official SILVER WINGS FRATERNITY Newsletter Summer Issue 2020 Copyright © 2020 Silver Wings Fraternity Aviation Scholarship Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved July-Sept 2020 Summer Issue Editor’s Column The MOST Influential Aircraft Will Jensen IN AVIATION HISTORY We lived through a lot this year. Coronavirus, quarantine, rioting in the streets including business de- THE PIPER CUB struction, inability, or unwillingness of many elected officials to do their elected jobs, not to mention cancel- lation of Sun & Fun and Oshkosh. The whole of Silver Wings Fraterni- ty has been canceled this year in- cluding our membership lunches, greeting old friends and new, even our Convention. Except, perhaps, for Slipstream. We looked back through history for some subjects to hold your interest, perhaps to even do some research or reading on your own. So, hail to the Piper Cub, the most significant aircraft in aviation history according, at least to Flying Magazine. A workhorse in training pilots—over 430,000 Pilots in WWII— for anti-submarine tracking, artillery spotting, tank busting, bazooka firing, even shooting down the last Germain aircraft on Photo by D. Miller the day the war ended. So, all you Bonanza, Cessna, Mooney, Likely there is no aircraft that’s been in or Yankee American pilots, just remember your first solo and your place in history. Likely in a J-3 Cub. continual flying for some 90 years. An aircraft in use by the military of 21 differ- Then, some of our hopefully not forgotten heroes like Eddie ent countries, in general aviation and for Rickenbacker adrift on a raft, or Clarence “Kelly” Johnson, the “Babe Ruth of aero engineering and Ben Rich, his successor commercial use for everything from towing who created “Stealth” and pushed up the ceiling of aerospace advertising banners to gliders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danish Cub Aircraft Co. Ltd
    1 The Danish Cub Aircraft Co. Ltd. By the mid-thirties the recession in Denmark had receded to such a degree that some business people felt that private flying might start to take of. In 1937, Jack Hedegaard, a Danish/American engineer returned from the U.S. with a license from the Taylor Aircraft Company to build the Taylor Cub aircraft in Scandinavia and a specimen Taylor J-2 aircraft. The aircraft with c/n 339 was assembled by the Kramme workshops and registered on 10.7.37 as OY-DUL, but Hedegaard, had problems with financing, so in 1937 a consortium led by automobile dealer Chr. Bohnstedt-Petersen, who had already founded a car assembly factory for Chrysler and Daimler-Benz in Copenhagen and who since 1919 had a flying license, signed a contract with the Piper Aircraft Company to take over the agency for Scandinavia (the American company had changed its name to Piper Aircraft Company, after the director in USA, Mr. Piper, procured Mr. Taylors share in the company.) The former military airfield at Lundtofte north of Copenhagen, including two hangars was rented from the Ministry of War for 20 years. The plan for the new company named “Cub Aircraft Co.Ltd” called for using the airfield, the two hangars there and the old Rohrbach hangar from Copenhagen Airport to assemble the Cub-sports aircraft. The Danish company would assemble aircraft from kits supplied from USA and it was planned to re-export the majority of the aircraft to the Scandinavian countries. In September 1937 Jack Hedegaard went to USA in order to procure tools and kits and to obtain experience in assembling the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Jets: 1 Dassault, 2 Embraer, 3 Gulfstream, 4 Textron, 5 Bombardier. Turboprops: 1 Pilatus, 2 Daher TBM, 3 Textron
    2019 CORPORATE AIRCRAFT PRODUCT SUPPORT SURVEY Jets: 1 Dassault, 2 Embraer, 3 Gulfstream, 4 Textron, 5 Bombardier. Turboprops: 1 Pilatus, 2 Daher TBM, 3 Textron. Pro Pilot staff report the crown for the first time ever. It suc- this year down from 8.55 in 2018. Em- Data compiled by Conklin & de Decker ceeded with an overall score of 8.26 braer ranked 1st in cost of parts, tech this year up from 8.13 in 2018. It takes manuals and tech reps. Embraer’s Tech- ftersale product support is a 1st place in spares availability and ser- Care Center team are ready to assist op- vital activity among aircraft vice satisfaction and 2nd in company erators 24/7/365. Aowners and operators. Once response time, cost of parts, speed in aircraft have been selected and ac- AOG service, tech manuals and tech Gulfstream takes 3rd spot this year quired by flight departments and own- reps. Dassault’s biggest increase was after being 2nd in 2018 and 1st in ers based on their missions it is up in tech manuals with 8.42 in 2019 2017. Its overall score is 8.14 down the OEMs to keep satisfied users. It’s up from 8.18 in 2018, a difference from 8.36 in 2018. Big G is 1st in com- essential that operators receive the as- of 0.24. DJF and its FalconResponse pany response time and speed in AOG sistance needed to continue flying and program, together with Falcon Spares, service categories and 2nd in spares accomplish their missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Norges Luftfartøyregister Norwegian Civil Aircraft Register
    NORGES LUFTFARTØYREGISTER NORWEGIAN CIVIL AIRCRAFT REGISTER UTDRAG AV NORGES LUFTFARTØYREGISTER PR. 01. JULI 2006 Summary of Norwegian Civil Aircraft Register showing the actual status on 01 July 2006 Type luftfartøy Antall Type of Aircraft Number Motordrevne fly 720 Engined-powered airplanes Helikoptre 168 Helicopters Seil-/motorfly 161 Gliders/motor-gliders Ballonger 13 Balloons Denne listen er en fortegnelse over samtlige luftfartøy registrert i Norges Luftfartøyregister. This is a list of all aircraft registered in the Norwegian Civil Aircraft Register. POSTADRESSE: Postboks 243, NO-8001 BODØ, Norway BESØKSADRESSER : Bodø: Bodø lufthavn TELEPHONE: +47 926 46 387, TELEFAX: +47 75 58 50 05 E-POST: [email protected], INTERNETT: www.luftfartstilsynet.no, AFTN: ENCAYAYA BANKGIRO: 7694 05 07681, SWIFT: PGINNOKK, ORG.NR: 981 105 516 Side/Page - 2 - Registr. Owner Manufacturer Maximum Cert. of marks Aircraft type Weight (kg) Airw.ness Serial number expires LN-AAB Sørgård Trond SAAB-Scania AB 1165 28.09.2008 Burkhovdane 6 91B 5914 ISDALSTØ 91-262 LN-AAC Reitås Hans Olaf The New Piper Aircraft, Inc 1111 28.09.2008 PA-28-180 28-7305486 7530 MERÅKER LN-AAD Moen Einar Lake Aircraft Corporation 1220 31.05.2005 Brattemoen 8 LA-4-200 837 4870 FEVIK LN-AAE Ødemark Kurt Vegar Cessna Aircraft Company 1111 28.09.2008 Gamleveien 6 175C 175-57093 3531 KROKKLEIVA LN-AAF Piper Saratoga DA The New Piper Aircraft, Inc 1633 28.09.2008 Stokkamyrveien 15 PA-32R-301T 4313 SANDNES 3257292 LN-AAG * Gjengedal Hans The New Piper Aircraft, Inc 1999 28.09.2008 Gjengedal
    [Show full text]
  • Jets: 1 Embraer, 2 Dassault, 3 Gulfstream, 4 Textron, 5 Bombardier. Turboprops: 1 Daher TBM, 2 Pilatus, 3 Piper, 4 Textron
    2021 CORPORATE AIRCRAFT PRODUCT SUPPORT SURVEY Jets: 1 Embraer, 2 Dassault, 3 Gulfstream, 4 Textron, 5 Bombardier. Turboprops: 1 Daher TBM, 2 Pilatus, 3 Piper, 4 Textron. Embraer wins 1st place in jet division for 2nd consecutive year. Daher earns 1st place in TP support for 1st time. Results are based on 1082 line evaluations and 1257 survey forms received – a 16.1% return. Pro Pilot staff report Dassault earns 2nd place, moving up Gulfstream ranks 3rd in 2021 after Data compiled by Conklin & de Decker from 3rd last year. They were 1st in 2019. placing 2nd in 2020, with an over- Overall score is 8.28 this year – up from all score of 8.24. Gulfstream takes 8.22 in 2020. Dassault obtains 1st place the 1st spot in company response uality in aftersale product support in speed in AOG service, 2nd in spares time and spares availability, and 3rd Qis what operators and business availability, cost of parts, tech manuals, in cost of parts, speed in AOG ser- owners need for their aircraft in order to tech reps, and service satisfaction, and vice, tech manuals, tech reps, and accomplish their missions successfully. 3rd in company response time. Best im- service satisfaction. Biggest improve- It’s the continuous efforts, diligent work, provement is in cost of parts, with a 6.79 ment was in cost of parts, with 6.28 and focus on customers from OEMs score this year compared to 6.61 in 2020 this year – a 0.22 increase from its that allow flight departments to achieve – an advance of 0.18.
    [Show full text]