DOCSLIB.ORG

Aeronautics and Space Report of the President

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 2009 Activities Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 2009 Activities The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 directed the annual Aeronautics and Space Report to include a “comprehensive description of the programmed activities and the accomplishments of all agencies of the United States in the field of aeronautics and space activities during the preceding calendar year.” In recent years, the reports have been prepared on a fiscal-year basis, consistent with the budgetary period now used in programs of the Federal Government. This year’s report covers Aeronautics and SpaceAeronautics Report of the President activities that took place from October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009. TABLE OF CONTENTS National Aeronautics and Space Administration . 1. Fiscal Year 2009 Activities Year Fiscal • Exploration Systems Mission Directorate 1 • Space Operations Mission Directorate 10 • Science Mission Directorate 18 • Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 25 Department of Defense . 41 Federal Aviation Administration . 45 . Department of Commerce . 51. Department of the Interior . 81. Federal Communications Commission . 103 U.S. Department of Agriculture. 107 National Science Foundation . 115 . Department of State. 125 Department of Energy. 129 Smithsonian Institution . 137. Appendices . 149 . • A-1 U S Government Spacecraft Record 150 • A-2 World Record of Space Launches Successful in Attaining Earth Orbit or Beyond 151 • B Successful Launches to Orbit on U S Vehicles 152 • C Human Spaceflights 155 • D-1A Space Activities of the U S Government—Historical Table of Budget Authority in Millions of Real-Year Dollars 156 • D-1B Space Activities of the U S Government—Historical Table of Budget Authority in Millions of Inflation-Adjusted FY 09 Dollars 157 • D-2 Federal Space Activities Budget 158 • D-3 Federal Aeronautics Activities Budget 159 Acronyms . .161 . 1 Fiscal Year 2009 Activities Year Fiscal NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Advanced Capabilities Division Advanced Capabilities In fiscal year 2009 (FY 09), the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate’s (ESMD) Advanced Capabilities Division (ACD) provided critical research and technology products that reduced operational and technical risks for the flight systems being developed by the Constellation Program.1 These products addressed high-priority technology requirements for lunar exploration; risk mitigation related to astronaut health and performance; basic research in life and physical sciences using the International Space Station (ISS), free-flying spacecraft, and ground-based laborato- ries; and lunar robotic missions to gather data relevant to future human lunar missions. Lunar Precursor Robotic Program The Lunar Precursor Robotic Program (LPRP) developed and executed robotic missions to the moon to prepare for future human exploration. Precursor activi- ties included topographical mapping, characterizing the distribution of lunar resources, and measuring the radiation and temperature environments on the 1. President Barack Obama’s FY 11 budget request, announced in February 2010, cancelled the Constellation Program. However, the FY 10 Consolidated Appropriations Act prohibited the cancel- lation of Constellation while the 2010 NASA Authorization Act directed NASA to develop a new approach to human spaceflight. Parts of Constellation were carried into the development of the new program, but please note that this report reflects a historical approach to the data available at the time. 2 lunar surface. Data from Lunar Precursor Robotic Program missions were critical to the Constellation Program’s efforts to return humans to the moon and supported astronaut safety issues, landing site selection, and engineering requirements for lunar surface hardware. The first lunar robotic mission was the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which provided detailed mapping for human landing site selection, valuable infor- mation about the lunar radiation and thermal environments, and the identifica- tion of lunar resource availability. A comanifested mission to LRO, the Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS), impacted a permanently shadowed crater on the lunar surface to investigate the possible presence of water and other volatiles. During FY 09, LRO was successfully launched and the spacecraft was commis- sioned in lunar orbit. All seven scientific instruments on board the spacecraft were activated and returned data. High-resolution optical and radar images of the lunar surface were acquired, including photos of the Apollo landing sites. The LRO spacecraft also measured extremely low temperatures in polar craters, mapped the distribution of hydrogen on the lunar surface, and determined the elevation of terrain features with its laser altimeter. After commissioning, the spacecraft was maneuvered into its mapping orbit to return data for one year. The Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project (LMMP) completed formulation, sys- tems requirements, and preliminary design audits in FY 09. The Project’s goals were Aeronautics and SpaceAeronautics Report of the President to create a comprehensive data archive and portal for all lunar data, including data from LRO and previous missions, such as Lunar Prospector and the Apollo mis- sions, for use by the Constellation Program mission planners for future human and robotic exploration. The lunar data will be presented via an intuitive, integrated, reliable set of mapping and modeling tools. Human Research Program The Human Research Program (HRP) investigates and mitigates the highest risks to astronaut health and performance in support of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) exploration missions. The program’s primary goal is to develop and provide human health and performance countermeasures, knowledge, technologies, and tools that enable safe, reliable, and productive 3 human space exploration. 2009 Activities Year Fiscal During FY 09, HRP recommended potassium citrate as a renal stone counter- measure for ISS astronauts. Flight medical personnel can use potassium citrate as a mitigation strategy for the buildup of calcium in the urine that causes the development of renal stones during long-term exposure to microgravity. The rec- ommendation was reviewed and approved for medical practice by the NASA Chief Health and Medical Officer. HRP also completed two important food system studies in thermostabilized food and nutrient stability. The thermostabilized food study was a three-year accelerated shelf-life test of 13 thermostabilized food items to determine shelf life for extended- duration exploration. Egg products had a shelf life of zero months, indicating that thermostabilized processing cannot be used for egg products. Currently, egg prod- ucts are freeze-dried, with a shelf life of approximately 12 months. Vegetable dishes had a shelf life of 12 to 50 months, while grilled pork chops and salmon were acceptable for 87 to 96 months. Shelf life values were extrapolated for NASA’s 65 thermostabilized items. Results indicated that greater than 50 percent of the current menu items would have a shelf life of less than three years. These analyses suggested that new processing technologies will be needed to improve initial qual- ity and extend the shelf life of food products for use in long-duration missions. The nutrient stability study determined the stability of food and nutritional items, representative of the types and classes typically provided on space missions, after prolonged exposure to the spaceflight environment. Kits were exposed to space for a period of up to 19 months and returned to Earth for nutritional analysis. Results of the study indicated that long-duration storage has a much greater effect on nutrient stability than does spaceflight. This emphasized the need for improved packaging or other means to increase the shelf life of nutrients in the food system and mitigate time-related nutrient degradation. HRP completed the Space Flight Human-System Standard Volume 2 and the Human Integration Design Handbook to support the development of Constellation space vehicles, including the Orion capsule. The handbook contains human- system integration data and lessons learned from previous human programs. Its 4 purpose is to aid interpretation of Volume 2 standards by providing guidance to space vehicle and habitat designers. HRP completed behavioral health and performance studies during the Russian Academy of Sciences’ 105-day Chamber Study, late March through July, in part- nership with the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI). The isolation chamber study served as a simulation of a six-person ISS crew. Three studies sponsored by the National Space Biomedical Research Institute were con- ducted: operational evaluation of a photic countermeasure to improve alertness, performance, and mood during night-shift work; objective monitoring of crew neu- robehavioral functions and crew interactions; and autonomy during long-duration isolation and confinement. HRP delivered a new model of the acute risks from solar particle events, devel- oped in collaboration with the Department of Defense Special Weapons Agency (formerly the Nuclear Agency). The acute radiation risks body organ dose model predicts possible early health effects on crews from exposure to some historically large solar events possible on lunar and/or Mars missions. Based on model assump- tions, exposure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observation of Light Curves of Space Objects Hirohisa Kurosaki Japan
    Observation of Light Curves of Space Objects Hirohisa Kurosaki Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Toshifumi Yanagisawa Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Atsushi Nakajima Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Abstract Geostationary orbit and low earth orbit have many artificial satellites, and the accidents of these satellites affect every area such as weather forecasts and communications. In the optical observation, the periodical change of the brightness which is caused by the type and the shape of the satellite is seen. In the case of LEO debris, since the movement is fast, it crosses the field of view in several seconds. We used an observation method to get the data of LEO debris. In case of the GEO debris, the rate of motion is slow in comparison with LEO debris. Fixed stars are observed by the same position on the image when the telescope is operated in sidereal tracking mode. Then, space objects are recorded on the image with streaks of light. In this paper, the observation and the detection method of light curve of geostationary orbit debris are discussed. Observing the changes of the operative satellites with some time intervals may help to detect the abnormalities and accidents of them. 1. INTRODUCTION Artificial satellites that have finished their missions and used rockets are called space debris. Most of them are not under any control. The space debris problem must be solved to perform future space development and maintain safety. Many artificial satellites indispensable for human activities circle the earth. If one of these satellites malfunctions, many human activities are impacted. An artificial satellite is monitored to control its trajectory while it is in operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Lifetime Predictions
    Orbital LIFETIME PREDICTIONS An ASSESSMENT OF model-based BALLISTIC COEFfiCIENT ESTIMATIONS AND ADJUSTMENT FOR TEMPORAL DRAG co- EFfiCIENT VARIATIONS M.R. HaneVEER MSc Thesis Aerospace Engineering Orbital lifetime predictions An assessment of model-based ballistic coecient estimations and adjustment for temporal drag coecient variations by M.R. Haneveer to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday June 1, 2017 at 14:00 PM. Student number: 4077334 Project duration: September 1, 2016 – June 1, 2017 Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. N. Doornbos, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. E. J. O. Schrama, TU Delft ir. K. J. Cowan MBA TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Summary Objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) experience low levels of drag due to the interaction with the outer layers of Earth’s atmosphere. The atmospheric drag reduces the velocity of the object, resulting in a gradual decrease in altitude. With each decayed kilometer the object enters denser portions of the atmosphere accelerating the orbit decay until eventually the object cannot sustain a stable orbit anymore and either crashes onto Earth’s surface or burns up in its atmosphere. The capability of predicting the time an object stays in orbit, whether that object is space junk or a satellite, allows for an estimate of its orbital lifetime - an estimate satellite op- erators work with to schedule science missions and commercial services, as well as use to prove compliance with international agreements stating no passively controlled object is to orbit in LEO longer than 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • ARC-OVER April
    April Upcoming Events Next Board Meeting: May 6 Next General Meeting: May 12 Field Day: June 27 & 28 Pacificon: October 16 - 18 Dayton Hamvention May 15 TARC Meeting April 14, 2015 Turlock, War Memorial 7:00 p.m. Ron Roos, KJ6KNL, Our honorable President, called the meeting to order Pledge of Allegiance, All members and guests introduced themselves. Dylan Low, KK6SYD, was a first time guest. All were welcomed. Dick Decker, Vice President, K6SUU, gave an interesting presentation on Hams In Space. This was the topic members showed the most interest in. Fox 1 will launch on August 27th, 2015. To contact Space Stations in the past the Uplink was on VHF and the Downlink on UHF. This is now reversed, the Uplink will be UHF and the Downlink will be VHF. For a full copy of the Powerpoint Presentation, Dick announced that those interested could send an email to him and he would send it to those requesting it. Included in the Powerpoint will be the links for further information. Dick explained that Space stations were easier to use than Satellites. A variety of antennas were shown and discussed. They included; The Yagi, Two Elk Antennas (mounted on PVC) and one that really measured up; The Tape Measure Antenna. Dick informed all that he has a radio that members could use to hit the Space Station. Please contact him if you are interested. The process is pretty simple and it is rewarding when you get your card back in the mail! Dick’s email is; [email protected] 1 Ron Roos, asked members if they had read the minutes from our March 10th Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150020985 2019-08-31T05:38:38+00:00Z IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station - We're Part Way up the Mountain John-David F. Bartoe and Thomas Holloway NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA The first phase of the International Space Station construction has been completed, and research has begun. Russian, U.S., and Canadian hardware is on orbit, ard Italian logistics modules have visited often. With the delivery of the U.S. Laboratory, Destiny, significant research capability is in place, and dozens of U.S. and Russian experiments have been conducted. Crew members have been on orbit continuously since November 2000. Several "bumps in the road" have occurred along the way, and each has been systematically overcome. Enormous amounts of hardware and software are being developed by the International Space Station partners and participants around the world and are largely on schedule for launch. Significant progress has been made in the testing of completed elements at launch sites in the United States and Kazakhstan. Over 250,000 kg of flight hardware have been delivered to the Kennedy Space Center and integrated testing of several elements wired together has progressed extremely well. Mission control centers are fully functioning in Houston, Moscow, and Canada, and operations centers Darmstadt, Tsukuba, Turino, and Huntsville will be going on line as they are required. Extensive coordination efforts continue among the space agencies of the five partners and two participants, involving 16 nations. All of them continue to face their own challenges and have achieved significant successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretariat Distr.: General 23 February 2010
    United Nations ST/SG/SER.E/573 Secretariat Distr.: General 23 February 2010 Original: English Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Information furnished in conformity with the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space Note verbale dated 5 August 2009 from the Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations (Vienna) addressed to the Secretary-General The Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations (Vienna) presents its compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and, in accordance with article IV of the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space (General Assembly resolution 3235 (XXIX), annex), has the honour to transmit registration data on space launches by the United States for the period from April to June 2009 (see annexes I-III). V.10-51330 (E) 100310 110310 *1051330* ST/SG/SER.E/573 2 Annex I Registration data on space launches by the United States of America for April 2009* The following report supplements the registration data on United States launches as at 30 April 2009. All launches were made from the territory of the United States unless otherwise specified. Basic orbital characteristics International Location Nodal period Inclination Apogee Perigee designation Name of space object Date of launch of launch (min) (degrees) (km) (km) General function of space object The following objects were launched since the last report and remain in orbit: 2009-017A WGS F2 (USA 204) 4 April 2009 – 116.3 26.9 2 865 168 Spacecraft engaged in practical applications and uses of space technology such as weather or communications 2009-017B Atlas 5 Centaur R/B 4 April 2009 – 1 264.0 20.8 64 248 448 Spent boosters, spent manoeuvring stages, shrouds and other non-functional objects The following objects not previously reported have been identified since the last report: None.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Debris
    IADC-11-04 April 2013 Space Debris IADC Assessment Report for 2010 Issued by the IADC Steering Group Table of Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................... 1 2. IADC Highlights ................................................................ 2 3. Space Debris Activities in the United Nations ................... 4 4. Earth Satellite Population .................................................. 6 5. Satellite Launches, Reentries and Retirements ................ 10 6. Satellite Fragmentations ................................................... 15 7. Collision Avoidance .......................................................... 17 8. Orbital Debris Removal ..................................................... 18 9. Major Meetings Addressing Space Debris ........................ 20 Appendix: Satellite Break-ups, 2000-2010 ............................ 22 IADC Assessment Report for 2010 i Acronyms ADR Active Debris Removal ASI Italian Space Agency CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (France) CNSA China National Space Agency CSA Canadian Space Agency COPUOS Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, United Nations DLR German Aerospace Center ESA European Space Agency GEO Geosynchronous Orbit region (region near 35,786 km altitude where the orbital period of a satellite matches that of the rotation rate of the Earth) IADC Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee ISRO Indian Space Research Organization ISS International Space Station JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency LEO Low
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Legal Issues Paul B
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 82 | Issue 2 Article 3 2017 Small Satellite Legal Issues Paul B. Larsen Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Part of the Air and Space Law Commons Recommended Citation Paul B. Larsen, Small Satellite Legal Issues, 82 J. Air L. & Com. 275 (2017) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol82/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. SMALL SATELLITE LEGAL ISSUES PAUL B. LARSEN* I. INTRODUCTION.................................. 276 II. USES OF SMALL SATELLITES .................... 280 III. LICENSING OF SMALL SATELLITE OPERATIONS ..................................... 281 IV. RADIOFREQUENCIES AND ORBITS MUST BE LICENSED BY THEIR NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS AND REGULATED BY THE INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ............................................ 283 V. SMALL SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING .......... 287 VI. SMALL SATELLITES MUST BE REGISTERED IN THEIR NATIONAL REGISTRY AND IN THE U.N. REGISTRY ......................................... 289 VII. LIABILITY ISSUES OF SMALL SATELLITES ...... 291 VIII. SPACE DEBRIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ............................................. 294 IX. PUBLIC SAFETY EFFECTS OF SMALL SATELLITES ....................................... 299 X. SMALL SATELLITE NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES ............................................. 302 XI. CONCLUSION..................................... 306 * The author taught air and space law for more than forty years respectively at Southern Methodist University and Georgetown University. He is co-author of FRANCIS LYALL & PAUL B. LARSEN, SPACE LAW: A TREATISE (2009) and of PAUL B. LARSEN ET AL., AVIATION LAW: CASES AND RELATED SOURCES (2d ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Security in Space the Next Generation UNITED NATIONS UNITED
    UNIDIR Security in Space: The Next Generation “Security in Space: The Next Generation” is the seventh annual conference held by the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research on the issues of space security, the peaceful uses of outer space and the prevention of an arms race in outer space. This conference looked at ways to build trust in space activities in the future as well as how THE SIMONS to move from confrontation to cooperation as a way to increase space security and improve FOUNDATION access to outer space for peaceful activities. Participants and presenters discussed the need for new international legal instruments, with specific reference to the Chinese–Russian SECURE WORLD FOUNDATION proposal for a Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, the Threat or Use of Force against Outer Space Objects. Conference Report 2008 UNITED NATIONS INSTITUTE FOR DISARMAMENT UNIDIR UNIDIRRESEARCH Security in Space The Next Generation UNITED NATIONS UNITED NATIONS Designed and printed by the Publishing Service, United Nations, Geneva GE.08-02341 — November 2008 — 3,000 — UNIDIR/2008/14 United Nations Publication Conference Report Sales No. GV.E.08.0.3 ISBN 978-92-9045-192-1 31 March –1 April 2008 UNIDIR/2008/14 Security in Space: The Next Generation Conference Report 31 March–1 April 2008 UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva, Switzerland New York and Geneva, 2008 About the cover Cover photograph courtesy of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssc09-Xii-03
    SSC09-XII-03 The Promise of Innovation from University Space Systems: Are We Meeting It? Michael Swartwout St. Louis University 3450 Lindell Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63103; (314) 977-8240 [email protected] ABSTRACT A popular notion among universities is that we are innovation-drivers in the staid, risk-adverse spacecraft industry – we are to professional small satellites what small satellites are to the “battlestars”. By contrast, professional industry takes a much different perspective on university-class spacecraft; these programs are good for attracting students to space and providing valuable pre-career training, but the actual flight missions are ancillary, even unimportant. Which opinion is correct? Both are correct. The vast majority of the 111 student-built spacecraft that have flown have made no innovative contributions. That is not to say that they have been without contribution. In addition to the inarguable benefits to education, many have served as radio Amateur communications, science experiments and even technological demonstrations. But “innovative”? Not so much. However, there have been two innovative contributors, whose contributions are large enough to settle the question: the University of Surrey begat SSTL, which helped create the COTS-based small satellite industry. Stanford and Cal Poly begat CubeSats, whose contributions are still being created today. This paper provides an update to our earlier submissions on the history of student-built spacecraft. Major trends identified in previous years will be re-examined with new data -- especially the bifurcation between larger-scale, larger-scope "flagship" programs and small-scale, reduced-mission "independents". In particular, we will demonstrate that the general history of student-built spacecraft has not been one of innovation, nor of development of new space systems -- with those few, extremely noteworthy, exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesat (Launched Dec 2006), – Pre-Sat/Nanosail-D (Aug 2008) – Pharmasat (Launched May 2009), – O/OREOS (Planned May
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Free Flyer Utilization for Biology Research John W. Hines Chief Technologist, Engineering Directorate Technical Director, Nanosatellite Missions NASA-Ames Research Center NASA Applications of BioScience/BioTechnology HumanHuman ExplorationExploration EmphasisEmphasis FundamentalFundamental ExploratiExploratioonn Subsystems BiologyBiology Subsystems EmphasisEmphasis HumansHumans SmallSmall OrganismsOrganisms (Mice,(Mice, Rats) Rats) TiTissussue,e, O Orrgansgans MammalianMammalian CellsCells Human Health Emphasis ModelModel Organisms, BioMolecules Organisms, BioMolecules MicrobesMicrobes 2 4 Free-Flyer Utilization Free Flyer Features • Advantage: Relatively inexpensive means to increase number of flight opportunities • Capabilities: – Returnable capsule to small secondary non-recoverable satellites, and/or – In-situ measurement and control with autonomous sample management • Command and Control: Fully automated or uplinked command driven investigations. • Research data: Downlink and/or receipt of the samples • Collaborations: Interagency, academic, commercial and international Russian Free Flyers Early Free Flyers NASA Biosatellite I, II, 1966-67 NASA Biosatellite III, 1969 Nominal 3d flights Nominal 20d flight • Response to microgravity & • Spaceflight responses of non-human radiation: various biological species primates • Onboard radiation source Timeline of Russian-NASA Biology Spaceflights Collaborations Bion* Characteristics Bion Rationale • Increases access to space • Proven Platforms
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat Communication Systems 2003-2013: a Historical Look
    CubeSat Communication Systems 2003-2013: A Historical Look Bryan Klofas SRI International [email protected] Nanosatellite Ground Station Workshop San Luis Obispo, California 23 April 2013 Two Survey Papers • “A Survey of CubeSat Communication Systems” – Paper presented at the CubeSat Developers’ Workshop 2008 – By Bryan Klofas, Jason Anderson, and Kyle Leveque – Covers the CubeSats from start of program to 2008 • “A Survey of CubeSat Communication Systems: 2009-2012” – Paper presented at the CubeSat Developers’ Workshop 2013 – By Bryan Klofas and Kyle Leveque – Covers the CubeSats from 2009 to ELaNa-6/NROL-36 launch in 2012 Slide 2 Summary of CubeSat Launches 2003 to 2013 • Eurockot (30 June 2003) • Dnepr Launch 2 (17 Apr 2007) – AAU1 CubeSat – CSTB1 – DTUsat-1 – AeroCube-2 – CanX-1 – CP4 – Cute-1 – Libertad-1 – QuakeSat-1 – CAPE1 – XI-IV – CP3 • SSETI Express (27 Oct 2005) – MAST – XI-V • NLS-4/PSLV-C9 (28 Apr 2008) – NCube-2 – Delfi-C3 – UWE-1 – SEEDS-2 • M-V-8 (22 Feb 2006) – CanX-2 – Cute-1.7+APD – AAUSAT-II • Minotaur 1 (11 Dec 2006) – Compass-1 – GeneSat-1 Slide 3 Summary of CubeSat Launches 2003 to 2013 • Minotaur-1 (19 May 2009) • NLS-6/PSLV-C15 (12 July 2010) – AeroCube-3 – Tisat-1 – CP6 – StudSat – HawkSat-1 • STP-S26 (19 Nov 2010) – PharmaSat – RAX-1 • ISILaunch 01 (23 Sep 2009) – O/OREOS – BEESAT-1 – NanoSail-D2 – UWE-2 • Falcon 9-002 (8 Dec 2010) – ITUpSAT-1 – Perseus (4) – SwissCube – QbX (2) • H-IIA F17 (20 May 2010) – SMDC-ONE – Hayato – Mayflower – Waseda-SAT2 – PSLV-C18 (12 Oct 2011) – Negai-Star – Jugnu Slide 4 Summary
    [Show full text]