Celebrating Navy Women: Perseverance & Achievements
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St. -
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions .................................................................................................................. -
Hangar 2 Re-Use Guidelines
Re-Use Guidelines Hangar 2 (Building No. 46) NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California August 30, 2006 Prepared for Integrated Science Solutions, Inc. Moffett Field, California Prepared by page & turnbull, inc. San Francisco, California Reuse Guidelines Hangar 2 Moffett Field, California Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 a. Project Team..................................................................................................................................3 b. Purpose..........................................................................................................................................4 c. Methodology....................................................................................................................................4 d. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................5 II. BUILDING SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 9 a. Description...................................................................................................................................10 b. History ........................................................................................................................................21 c. Construction Chronology ...............................................................................................................33 -
International Programs Key to Security Cooperation an Interview With
SURFACE SITREP Page 1 P PPPPPPPPP PPPPPPPPPPP PP PPP PPPPPPP PPPP PPPPPPPPPP Volume XXXII, Number 3 October 2016 International Programs Key to Security Cooperation An Interview with RADM Jim Shannon, USN, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for International Programs Conducted by CAPT Edward Lundquist, USN (Ret) Tell me about your mission, and what intellectual property of the technology you have — your team —in order to that we developed for our Navy execute that mission? programs – that includes the Marine It’s important to understand what your Corps. These are Department of Navy authorities are in any job you come Programs, for both the Navy and Marine into. You just can’t look at a title and Corps, across all domains – air, surface, determine what your job or authority subsurface, land, cyber, and space, is. In this case, there are Secretary everywhere, where the U.S. Navy or of the Navy (SECNAV) instructions; the Department of the Navy is the lead there’s law; and then there’s federal agent. As the person responsible for government regulations on how to this technology’s security, I obviously do our job. And they all imply certain have a role where I determine “who levels of authority to the military do we share that information with and departments – Army, Navy, and Air how do we disclose that information.” Force. And then the Office of the The way I exercise that is in accordance Secretary of Defense (OSD) has a with the laws, the Arms Export Control separate role, but altogether, we work Act. -
The Army Lawyer (ISSN 0364-1287)
THE ARMY Headquarters, Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-50-222 June 1991 Table of Contents Address tolbe JAG Regimental Workrhop .................................................................................. 3 Major General John L Fugh Article The Persian Oulf War Crimes Trials.. ..................................................................................... 7 Captain R Peter Mastenon USALSA Report.. ........................................................................................................ 18 Unlted States Army bgal Services Agency The Advocate for Military Defense Counsel DAD Notes.. ...................................................................................................... 18 Follow All Leads: COMA Is Watching; What Is a "Breaking"?; The Ever-Widening Scope of Fraternization in the Military Contract Appeals Division Note.. ......................................................................................... 22 Narional Biosystenu and Corporate Jee: Jurisdiction "by Quantity" (Is Any Quantity Enough?) 'r Lkutenant Colonel Chrencc D. Long Clerk of court Note.. .................................................................................................. 25 t The Army Court of Military Review in 1990 TJAGSA Practice Nota ................................................................................................... 26 Instructors, The Judge Advocate General's School Criminal Law Noh.. .................................................................................................. -
D a V Representatives Appear in Plea for Bills Affecting Vets
~ eli e is md for the Ill, as ) wa ble r ,minll spas parts ,ition he cl l asbi-~~~::~:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------______________ . XXX, NO. 17 DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS' SEMI-MONTHLY, APR. 28, 1953 WHOLE NUMBER 807 bs With Good Pay D A V Representatives Appear nd More Secure Future ~isa prentice T raining For Veterans Fhall f f an by ANSEL R. CLEARY In Plea For Bills Affecting Vets r ~~~ . Assistant. Directo~, BUl'eau of Apprenticeship na o!e: For. those mter~st.ed IU reading further along this line there is an Ad" d OF A I Across-the-Board Scale Asked For Veterans effi e '" the ~ovembe~ J9al Is~ue of the ItBAIJI!:R'S DH}1'jST entitled. "Want- I u icatl"on ppea s ~ lore and Better \Iorkcr. 10 the BuihUng Trades," which Is hl/:,hly recom- Short-Changed By Less Than 50 MO Dz'sabz'lz'ty of th e!'. The artIcle, bl' Blake Clark, is a condensation from the Kiwanis 7( nts z~~'~ands of young men just out of the service are asking Under Veterans' PreFerence The DAV representatives appeared before the Radwan ~ equi lselves:. "How can I get a job that will pay me a living Subcommittee of the House Veterans Affairs Committee last I ~'ule e an~ g.lve me an opportunity for a better, more secure Increased attention was given during the fiscal year 1952 week to take a stand on a number of bills affecting vets. co of life m the future?" Their answer to this question will to the problem of speeding up the Commission's appellate DAV representatives brought up nine bills for discussion d r!f~' ably be the most important decision they will ever make. -
Kauffman Sailors Bring U.S. Navy Skills to Angola
www.nsa.naples.navy.mil/panorama/ NSA’S MISSION STATEMENT: “TO PROVIDE QUALITY SUPPORT TO ELIGIBLE PERSONNEL, ACTIVITIES, AND AFLOAT UNITS IN OUR GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY.” Serving the NATO, Naples and Gaeta Military Communities in Italy 52ND YEAR, NO. 10 FRIDAY, MARCH 9, 2007 SPEDIZIONE IN A.P. - 45% - ART. 2 COMMA 20/B LEGGE 662/96 - FILIALE DI NAPOLI Above: After a USS Kauffman (FFG 59) bridge instruments demonstration Feb. 22 by QM2 Scott Coulson, left, an Angolan Navy Sailor explains to his shipmates the importance of propulsion in restricted maneuvering situations. (Photo by MC2 Anthony Dallas) Left: STCGS (SW) Daniel Cook, left, and ET2 (SW) Evan Hall, back left, prac- tice ship-boarding tactics with Angolan Navy Sailors on Feb. 21 aboard Kauffman. The training, in conjunction with Kauffman’s Feb. 20-24 port visit to Luanda, is part of a U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa initiative to improve maritime security by helping African partners build core compe- tencies and capability. A task group comprised of Kauffman, USCGC Legare (WMEC 912) and elements of Destroyer Squadron 60 is currently deployed to the Gulf of Guinea. (Photo by MC2 Anthony Dallas) Kauffman Sailors bring U.S. Navy skills to Angola By MC2 Anthony Dallas strategic commitment by Naval important in many ways, espe- CNE-C6F Public Affairs Forces Europe [and the] 6th cially in developing security Fleet to improve maritime secu- cooperation,” said Efird. “I LUANDA, Angola — USS rity and safety in this region,” think this visit represents hope Kauffman (FFG 59) completed a said Capt. John Nowell, who is in the local community as four-day port visit here Feb. -
Pull Together Fall/Winter 2014
Preservation, Education, and Commemoration Vol. 53, No. 1 Fall-Winter 2013/2014 PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation An AEGIS Legacy: Wayne Meyer’s History War Rooms, Page 3 Remembering September 16, 2013. Page 6 Also in the issue: Olympia update, pp. 9–10 ; Navy Museum News, pp. 12–13; Naval History News, pp. 14–16; News from the NHF, pp. 17–20; Remembering Rear Admiral Kane pp. 22-23. Message From the Chairman Last month, you received the Foundation’s year-end appeal from our president, Rear Adm. John Mitchell. If you sent your donations earlier this year, or in response to this appeal, thank you! For those of you contemplating a gift, I hope you’ll refl ect on our successes in “preserving and honoring the legacy of those who came before us; educating and inspiring the generations who will follow.” We’ve got much left to do, and your support makes all the difference. This is a great time to make that tax-deductible donation or IRA distribution direct to NHF! The year-end appeal featured a 1948 letter from then-NHF Vice President Fleet Adm. Chester W. Nimitz to then-NHF President Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King referring to the budget and political woes encountered 65 years ago in the nation’s capital: “I, for one, am glad to be away from that trouble spot….” Yet despite the challenges King faced, including a series of debilitating strokes, he remained strongly committed to growing the NHF and educating the American public about this nation’s great naval heritage. -
Navy Manpower Planning
Navy Manpower Planning David Rodney March 2017 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 2/28/2017 Other requests for this document shall be referred to CNA Document Center at [email protected]. Photography Credit: http://www.navy.mil/view_single_ad.asp?id=1281 . Approved by: March 2017 Linda Cavalluzzo, Vice President and Director Resource Analysis Division This work was performed under Federal Government Contract No. N00014-16-D-5003. Copyright © 2017 CNA Table of Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of Monograph ......................................................................................................................1 Top-Level View of the Navy Manpower Planning Process ..........................................................2 The Time Dimension in MPT&E ...........................................................................................................5 MPT&E Management Structure ........................................................................................................6 Requirements ............................................................................................................................................12 -
Developing Senior Navy Leaders: Requirements for Flag Officer
THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Developing Senior Navy Leaders Requirements for Flag Officer Expertise Today and in the Future Lawrence M. -
Personal Qualification Standard
NSA MID-SOUTH, MILLINGTON, TENNESEE CHIEF PETTY OFFICERS 365 PHASE I TRAINING PROGRAM (OCTOBER 2016) PERSONAL QUALIFICATION STANDARD For United States Navy First Class Petty Officers and Junior Officers Name (Rate/rank) ___________________________________________ DISTRUBUTION NOTICE: Intended for any E6 and below, E7 or Junior Officer that is interested in their development as a forward-leaning Deckplate Leader. PREFACE Chief Petty Officers are an essential element of our Navy’s Operational Primacy. The objective of the CPO 365 Phase I Program is to provide the First Class Petty Officer or Junior Officer an introduction into the processes and topics necessary to support the junior Sailor, the Chief’s Mess and the wide scope of mission requirements our Navy faces today. This personnel qualification standard will focus on mission effectiveness, combat readiness, individual readiness and an overall understanding of how the unit mission fits into and supports Navy Doctrine. Experience shows it is essential that every Chief Petty Officer in our Navy be totally familiar with the mission of their command and be able to apply this knowledge to support the successful execution of the command’s current and future obligations. 2 Table Of Contents Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Acronyms 7 100 Introduction to Fundamentals 8 101 Unit Level Administration Brilliant on the Basics 27 Evaluations and Fitness Reports 28 Medical and Dental Readiness 29 Defense Travel System/GTCC 30 Mobilization Readiness 31 Family Readiness/Ombudsman Program 32 Recognition -
THE PHILIPPINE NAVY • Four-Fold Mission: 1. National Defense 2
THE PHILIPPINE NAVY Learning Outcomes: After the class discussion, the students are expected to: • Enumerate the mission and role of the Modern Philippine Navy • Develop an appreciation on the short history of the Philippine Navy during its infancy stage Four-fold Mission: 1. National Defense 2. Security Operations 3. Deterrence 4. National Development The Navy's Roles The modern Navy has expanded its roles beyond the initial mandate to protect the country's shores. These roles include: 1. The Navy shall defend the territory from external aggression. 2. The Navy shall continue its role of securing the Philippine maritime areas from all forms of intrusions and encroachment, piracy and drug trafficking. 3. The Navy shall assist other government agencies in protecting our marine resources and environment. 4. The Navy shall continue to assist in the conduct of rescue and relief operations not only during accidents _________________________________________1 at sea but even during natural calamities in land such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and floods. 5. The Navy shall continue assisting in national socio- economic development. 6. The Navy, as it acquires new and more potent assets, will be an effective instrument of government in fulfilling various security-related international commitments. History The Philippines had long been a seafaring nation. Early Filipino inhabitants came from across the seas - from Ancient China, Borneo and Malay Peninsula. For centuries, seafaring natives living along the coastal areas of the country have sailed across the uncharted waters of the surrounding seas in their frail little boats. The Filipino seafarers engaged in a very active trade and made regular voyages to neighboring countries in Southeast Asia and the Far East.