DOCSLIB.ORG

Hangar 2 Re-Use Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hangar 2 Re-Use Guidelines Re-Use Guidelines Hangar 2 (Building No. 46) NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California August 30, 2006 Prepared for Integrated Science Solutions, Inc. Moffett Field, California Prepared by page & turnbull, inc. San Francisco, California Reuse Guidelines Hangar 2 Moffett Field, California Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 a. Project Team..................................................................................................................................3 b. Purpose..........................................................................................................................................4 c. Methodology....................................................................................................................................4 d. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................5 II. BUILDING SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 9 a. Description...................................................................................................................................10 b. History ........................................................................................................................................21 c. Construction Chronology ...............................................................................................................33 d. Conditions Assessment.................................................................................................................35 III. HISTORICAL STATUS ............................................................................................ 47 a. National Register of Historic Places .............................................................................................47 b. California Register of Historical Resources....................................................................................50 c. National Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks .........................................................................51 IV. SIGNIFICANCE ...................................................................................................... 52 a. Significance Statement ..................................................................................................................52 b. Significant Features and Elements................................................................................................52 c. Significance Diagrams...................................................................................................................57 V. BUILDING STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS ......................................................................... 62 a. Description of Hangars ................................................................................................................62 b. Physical Condition of Hangars and Past-Repair Work ................................................................68 c. Seismic Assessment.......................................................................................................................72 d. Wind Assessment ........................................................................................................................79 e. Structural Conclusions and Recommendations ...............................................................................80 f. Bibliography..................................................................................................................................82 VI. BUILDING MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS ..................... 84 a. Mechanical...................................................................................................................................84 b. Electrical......................................................................................................................................87 c. Fire Protection System ..................................................................................................................90 d. Plumbing Systems ........................................................................................................................95 VII. SAFETY/STABILITY ............................................................................................. 97 a. Foreword......................................................................................................................................97 b. Code Issue Matrix.................................................................................................................... 100 c. Summary................................................................................................................................... 101 VIII. REUSE GUIDELINES .........................................................................................107 a. Appropriate Uses...................................................................................................................... 107 b. Use Diagrams........................................................................................................................... 117 c. Common Considerations ............................................................................................................ 118 August 30, 2006 Page & Turnbull, Inc. 1 Reuse Guidelines Hangar 2 Moffett Field, California d. Architectural Treatments and Improvements.............................................................................. 121 e. Example Hangars..................................................................................................................... 126 f. Concluding Remarks.................................................................................................................. 130 IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................... 131 a. Books ....................................................................................................................................... 131 b. Articles..................................................................................................................................... 132 c. Unpublished and Other Resources.............................................................................................. 133 d. Internet Resources...................................................................................................................... 133 August 30, 2006 Page & Turnbull, Inc. 2 Reuse Guidelines Hangar 2 Moffett Field, California I. INTRODUCTION a. Project Team At the request of NASA Ames Research Center, Page & Turnbull has developed the following reuse guidelines for Hangar 2 at Moffett Field, California. The document identifies and evaluates historically significant and contributing elements at Hangar 2, analyzes code compliance concerns and provides recommendations and guidelines for its rehabilitation and reuse. Page & Turnbull has prepared a similar document for Hangar 3, a nearly identical hangar located adjacent and parallel to Hangar 2. NASA project managers, facility managers and archive curators have assisted Page & Turnbull in the preparation of this report. The project team consists of: • Page & Turnbull, Inc. 724 Pine Street San Francisco, CA 94108 J. Gordon Turnbull, Principal-In-Charge Melisa Gaudreau, Project Manager Elisa Skaggs, Designer Mark McMillan, Architectural Conservator Elizabeth Milnarik, Designer/Architectural Historian Richard Sucré, Architectural Historian Michael Tornabene, Designer • Degenkolb Engineers 225 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 John Dal Pino, Principal Andrew Mitchell, Design Engineer • Flack + Kurtz 405 Howard Street, Ste. 500 San Francisco, CA 94105 Todd M. See, PE, LEED AP Peter G. Samaras, PE, IALD, LC, LEED AP • NASA Ames Research Center/Integrated Science Solutions Inc. (ISSi) Thomas Anderson, Project Manager, ISSi Keith Venter, Federal Preservation Officer, NASA Ames Roger Ashbaugh, Historic Preservation Code QE, NASA Ames Michael Makinen, Former Federal Preservation Officer, NASA Ames Rocci Caringello, NASA Planning Office August 30, 2006 Page & Turnbull, Inc. 3 Reuse Guidelines Hangar 2 Moffett Field, California b. Purpose These reuse guidelines establish parameters for rehabilitation work and building reuse. They are intended to serve as a tool for entities engaged in evaluation and planning for Hangar 2, so that the historic character may be considered and preserved in conjunction with necessary changes to accommodate reuse. Included is a building description, an historical analysis, a conditions assessment, a discussion of historic significance, an evaluation of the significant features and elements, an analysis of the structural system by Degenkolb Engineers, an analysis of the mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems by Flack + Kurtz, a review of code issues and reuse guidelines that analyze three scenarios, in light of the historically significant nature of the structure. Reuse guidelines exist for many buildings within the designated historic district at Moffett Field and with the completion of reuse guidelines for Hangars 2 and 3; all contributing resources to the Shenandoah Plaza Historic will have been addressed. c. Methodology The following reuse guidelines are informed by historical information and plans supplied by NASA, site visits conducted by Page
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 7 49 12 23 43 57 75 34 Dpi.Usmc.Mil .Mcr Www Postal Servicespostal
    Welcome 4 Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island ....4 Naval Hospital Beaufort ....................................5 Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort ................4 6th Marine Corps District ..................................6 Information to Assist You 7 Reporting In..................................................7 Law Enforcement................................................8 Vehicle Registration......................................7 Traffic Regulations ..............................................8 Weapons Registration ..................................8 Housing 9 Applications ................................................9 Naval Hospital Beaufort ..................................11 What’s Available at Parris Island ................10 Household Goods Shipments ..........................11 What’s Available at MCAS Beaufort ............11 Services and Facilities 12 Religious Services ......................................12 Postal Services ................................................16 Permanent Personnel Worship ....................12 Thrift Shops ....................................................16 Public Affairs Offices ..................................12 Veterinary Services..........................................16 Legal Assistance..........................................13 Parris Island Museum......................................16 Financial Assistance....................................13 MCCS-SC Business Operations ......................17 Table of Contents Table Finance Office............................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Senior Navy Leaders: Requirements for Flag Officer
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Developing Senior Navy Leaders Requirements for Flag Officer Expertise Today and in the Future Lawrence M.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Terms and Acronyms
    Navy Terms and Acronyms — A — A-SCHOOL Vocational school that Sailors attend to train for their respective ratings. AD Active Duty Full-time Navy members. ADRIFT Loose from moorings and out of control. Applied to anything lost or out of hand. AE Aviation Electrician’s Mate. AEDO Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer. AEF Advanced Electronics Field Program. AFT Toward the stern (tail) of a ship. AIRR Aviation Rescue Swimmer Executes demanding rescues in all operational environments. ALL HANDS The entire ship’s company, both Officer and Enlisted. ALLOTMENT An amount of money a Sailor has coming out of regular pay. AMDO Aviation Maintenance Duty Officer An Officer who performs clerical, administrative and managerial duties necessary to keep aircraft maintenance activities running smoothly. AO Aviation Ordnanceman Aircraft armament specialists responsible for the storage, service, inspection and handling of weapons and ammunition carried on Navy aircraft. APG Advanced Pay Grade Opportunity to advance to a higher pay grade based on previously obtained experience. ASVAB Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery Test administered by the military to determine qualification for enlistment in the armed forces. Learn more > AT Annual Training Two weeks of training per year that a Reservist is required to fulfill. AYE, AYE Response acknowledging the understanding of a command/statement. — B — BARRACKS A building where Sailors live when ashore. BELOW Downstairs, like the next deck below. BLACKSHOE Non-aviation rate for Enlisted personnel as well as Officers. A “shoe” is a ship driver/Surface Warfare Officer. BLUE ANGELS The U.S. Navy and Marine Corps flight demonstration team. BLUE NOSE A Sailor who has crossed either the Arctic or Antarctic Circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Jun 0 2 2003 Barker Libraries
    Leveraging Information Technology to Enable Network Centric Engineer Reconnaissance Operations by Keith W. Barton, P. E. B.S., Civil Engineering Cornell University, 1994 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2003 @2003 Keith W. Barton All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 9, 2003 Certified by John B. Miller Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by_ Oral Buyukozturk Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 0 2 2003 BARKER LIBRARIES Leveraging Information Technology to Enable Network Centric Engineer Reconnaissance Operations by Keith W. Barton, P. E. Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering On May 9, 2003 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering Abstract The Naval Construction Force has traditionally depended on outside sources to obtain and analyze engineering data in contingency situations. The Navy has embarked on an initiative to develop Seabee Engineer Reconnaissance Teams to perform this function, both as a basis for projects slated for in-house construction and as a product to deliver to other organizations. Exercises and operations have thus far shown that the concept is viable, but Seabee Engineer Reconnaissance Teams have encountered problems with data gathering and reporting, and transmission of data and images.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Navy Women: Perseverance & Achievements
    Celebrating Navy Women: Perseverance & Achievements omen have profoundly impacted our Navy for more than a century, since being Wallowed to join in 1917. To honor those pioneers who have led the way, along with the more than 60,000 women who serve today, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday and Mrs. Linda Gilday, in coordination with Navy History and Heritage Command, created a display in CNO’s residence, Tingey House, as well as this e-book, which is organized into the following groupings: WWII era and prior; a selection of women ‘firsts’ in the Navy; and some photos of today’s Sailors. Where additional information is available, the photos are hyperlinked to articles, videos, and oral histories (click the photo to access the files). While we know this is a small representation of the women who serve today and the millions who have served, it is our hope it sparks conversation that honors women who wear the cloth of this nation. As a Navy, we celebrate the many accomplishments that women have achieved through hard work, grit and determination. Chief Yeoman (F) Loretta Perfectus Walsh After enlisting on March 17, 1917, Chief Walsh became not only the woman to serve in the Navy and its first female Chief Petty Officer, but also the first woman to serve in a non-nursing capacity in any branch of the armed forces. She served as a Yeoman (F) in the U.S. Naval Reserve during WWI. The first enlisted women in the Navy. Recruited to serve for the duration of WWI in order to free up male personnel for duty at sea, nearly 11,000 women were in uniform by Armistice Day (November 11, 1918).
    [Show full text]
  • Women Ashore: the Contribution of WAVES to US Naval Science and Technology in World War II
    Women Ashore: The Contribution of WAVES to US Naval Science and Technology in World War II Kathleen Broome Williams On 30 July 1947, US Navy (USN) women celebrated their fifth anniversary as WAVES: Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Se rv ice. In ceremonies across the count ry, flags snapped and crisp young women saluted. Congratulatory messages arrived from navy brass around the globe. The Commander-in-Chief (C-in-C) of the Atlantic Fleet, Admiral William H.P. Blandy, noted (perhaps too optimistically) that "the splendid serv ices rendered by the WAVES...and their uncomplaining spirit of sacrifice and devotion to duty at all times" would never be forgotten by "a grateful navy."' Admiral Louis E. Denfeld, C-in-C Pacific, wrote more perceptively that "the vital role" played by the WAVES "in the defeat of the Axis nations is known to all and, though often unsung in peacetime, their importance has not decreased." Significantly, Admiral Denfeld added that he would welcome the addition of the WAVES "to the Regular Naval Establishment," an issue then hanging in the balance.' Indeed, for all the anniversary praise, the WAVES' contribution to wartime successes did not even guarantee them a permanent place in the navy once peace returned nor, until recently, has their "vital role" in the Allied victory received much scholarly attention. This article helps to round out the historical record by briefly surveying one aspect of the role of the WAVES: their contribution to naval science and technology. The navy has always been a technical service but World War II was the first truly technological war.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy's Construction Arms Mark Anniversaries
    m 'HE U. S. Naval Base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba COVERS GTMO LIKE THE SUNSHINE Navy's Construction Arms Mark Anniversaries This past week the Civil Engineer Corps marked two outstanding events in their history. One was the 92nd Anniversary of the establishment of the Rescue Plane Civil Engineer Corps on the 2nd of March, and the other was the 17th Birthday of the Seabees on the 5th of March. The Bureau of Yards and Docks - was established on 31 August 1842 DChiefs at which time it consisted entirely of line officers. Though civil engineers were connected with the Navy as Voice Support early as 1802, the date Congress passed the Act authorizing commis- sioning of Civil Engineer Corps Offi- cers is considered as marking the beginning of the Civil Engineer Corps. Washington (AFPS)-Civilian and From that humble beginning, the military leaders of the Defense estab- Civil Engineer Corps expanded as the lishment have called on men and Navy grew and during World War women of the Armed Forces for generous support of the American .. II, it reached its peak of 10,186 offi- _ - cers in 1945. Construction work Red Cross during its annual fund planned and supervised by Civil Engi- campaign this month. omw 0 neer Corps Officers and completed by Secretary of Defense Neil McElroy, the Seabees has been valued at eight voicing his unqualified endorsement billion dollars. At the present time of the drive, said, "The work of the the number of Civil Engineer Corps Red Cross, like that pertaining to Officers on active duty, regular and national defense, is a responsibility of Two Men Saved By NAS reserve, is maintained at approxi- every American who has the interests mately 1500.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVY Safety & Occupational Health Manual OPNAV M-5100.23 of 5 Jun
    OPNAV M-5100.23 5 Jun 2020 NAVY SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH MANUAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OPNAV M-5100.23 5 Jun 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION A0101. Purpose……………………………………………………………………..... A1-2 A0102. Scope and Applicability……………………………………………………… A1-2 A0103. Definition of Terms………………………………………………………….. A1-4 A0104. Background…………………………………………………………………... A1-4 A0105. Discussion……………………………………………………………………. A1-5 A0106. Introduction to the Navy SMS Framework………………………………….. A1-6 A0107. Responsibilities………………………………………………………………. A1-7 Chapter 2. POLICY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT A0201. Introduction………………………………………………………………….. A2-1 A0202. Methodology………………………………………………………………… A2-1 A0203. Organizational Commitment and Accountability…………………………… A2-3 A0204. Appointment of SMS Personnel……………………………………………… A2-4 Chapter 3. RISK MANAGEMENT A0301. Introduction………………………………………………………………….. A3-1 A0302. Methodology………………………………………………………………… A3-1 A0303. Error Tolerance……………………………………………………………… A3-1 A0304. Principles…………………………………………………………………..... A3-2 A0305. Requirements………………………………………………………………… A3-3 Chapter 4. ASSURANCE A0401. Introduction………………………………………………………………….. A4-1 A0402. Methodology………………………………………………………………… A4-1 A0403. Requirements……………………………………………………..................... A4-1 A0404. Continuous Improvement………………………………………………….… A4-2 A0405. Management Review……………………………………………………….... A4-2 Chapter 5. PROMOTION A0501. Introduction………………………………………………………………….. A5-1
    [Show full text]
  • El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Oral History Project Abstracts 1 OH 3541 Narrator
    El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Oral History Project Abstracts OH 3541 Narrator: Nelson, Clarence (b. 1923) Interviewer: Robert Miller Title: “An Oral History with Clarence Nelson” Date: April 27, 2007 Language: English Location: Oceanside, California Project: El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Status: completed; 28 pages This oral history spans 1923-2007. Bulk dates: 1940s-1950s. An oral history with Clarence Nelson, resident of Oceanside, California, retired member of the United States Marine Corps (USMC), and husband of former member of the USMC Women’s Reserve, Vera Nelson (OH 3547). This interview was conducted as part of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Oral History Project for California State University, Fullerton and the Center for Oral and Public History. The purpose of this interview was to gather information regarding Nelson’s experiences at and around El Toro. This interview includes discussion about growing up on a farm in Idaho during the Depression; discusses different jobs he held before World War II, including a position with the Civilian Conservation Corps; discusses Pearl Harbor and his decision to join the USMC; describes training in San Diego and his eventual assignment to special services; details his work developing recreational activities; recalls deployment to Guadalcanal; remembers being hospitalized for malaria; discusses housing and transportation difficulties at El Toro MCAS; reflects on the Japanese American internment and the fear of Japanese bombing at San Diego; discusses the debate to terminate the USMC; details the changing of the ranking designations in the USMC during the 1950s, and his reinstatement for the Korean War; describes the restoration of the Lighter-than-Air (LTA) base for helicopter storage; recounts his son’s contraction of the polio and involvement in a March of Dimes fundraiser during a 1953 Polio epidemic; comments on El Toro’s closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol Price and the Founders of Fedmart and Price Club
    The Journal of Volume 56 Fall 2010 Number 4 • The Number Journal of San Diego History 2010 56 Fall Volume San Diego History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fund raising events; PRESERVE A SAN DIEGO TREASURE membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Your $100 contribution will help to create an endowment for Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The Journal of San Diego History The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American Please make your check payable to The San Diego Foundation. Indicate on National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed the bottom of your check that your donation is for The Journal of San Diego Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. History Fund. The San Diego Foundation accepts contributions of $100 and up. Your contribution is tax-deductible. The San Diego Foundation 2508 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92106 (619) 235-2300 or (858) 385-1595 [email protected] Cover: A collage of photos featuring Sol Price and the founders of FedMart and Price Club.
    [Show full text]
  • (B) Inserting "Except the Supply Corps and the Civil Engineer Corps" After "Any Staff Corps of the Navy"
    82 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 90-503-SEPT. 21, 1968 853 (B) inserting "except the Supply Corps and the Civil Engineer Corps" after "any staff corps of the Navy". (2) Subsection (b) is redesignated as subsection "(c)" and is amended by inserting "or (b)" after "subsection (a)". (3) Subsection (c) is redesignated as subsection "(d)" and is amended by striking out "(b)" and inserting "(c)" in place thereof. (4) Subsection (d) is redesignated as subsection "(e)". (5) Subsection (e) is redesignated as subsection "(f)" and is amended by striking out "(d)" and inserting "(e)" in place thereof. (6) A new subsection (a) is inserted readmg as follows: "(a) For the purpose of the preceding sections of this chapter, the total commissioned service of each officer on the active list of the Navy in the Supply Corps or the Civil Engineer Corps who was ini­ tially appointed as a Eegular or as a Reserve in the grade of ensign in the line or any staff corps or in the grade of lieutenant (junior grade) in the Civil Engineer Corps and who has served continuously on active duty since that appointment shall be computed from June 30, of the fiscal year in which he accepted that appointment." SEC*. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an officer of the Navy in the Supply Corps or the Civil Engineer Corps who is not selected for promotion to a higher grade after the enactment of this Act may not be retired under chapter 573 of title 10, United States Code, earlier than he would have been retired had this Act not been ^ lo use 637i- ,' T 6410.
    [Show full text]