DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Specialist Report for the Upgrade of Road D4407 Between Hluvukani and Timbavati (7.82 Km), Road D4409 at Welverdiend (6.88

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Specialist Report for the Upgrade of Road D4407 Between Hluvukani and Timbavati (7.82 Km), Road D4409 at Welverdiend (6.88 ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIST REPORT FOR THE UPGRADE OF ROAD D4407 BETWEEN HLUVUKANI AND TIMBAVATI (7.82 KM), ROAD D4409 AT WELVERDIEND (6.88 KM) AND ROAD D4416/2 BETWEEN WELVERDIEND AND _v001 ROAD P194/1 (1.19 KM) FOR THE ROAD D4416 DEVIATION 007 _ OPS IN THE EHLANZENI REGION OF THE MPUMALANGA PROVINCE PREPARED FOR: DATED: 22 January 2021 PREPARED BY: Ronaldo Retief Pr.Sci.Nat. Pr. EAPASA M · 072 666 6348 E · [email protected] T · +27 21 702 2884 26 Bell Close, Westlake Business Park F · +27 86 555 0693 Westlake 7945, Cape Town NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd | Reg No: 2007/023691/07 | VAT No. 4450208915 REAL GROWTH FOR PEOPLE, PLANET AND BUSINESS www.ncc-group.co.za 1 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE Specialist Name Nico-Ronaldo Retief Declaration of I declare, as a specialist appointed in terms of the National Environmental Management Independence Act (Act No 108 of 1998) and the associated 2014 Amended Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, that: • I act as the independent specialist in this application. • I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant. • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work. • I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the Act, Regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity. • I will comply with the Act, Regulations, and all other applicable legislation. • I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity. • I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and - the objectivity of any report, plan, or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority. • All the furnished by me in this form are true and correct; and • I realise that a false declaration is an offence in terms of regulation 48 and is punishable in terms of section 24F of the Act. Signature Date 8 March 2021 NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd Timbavati Biodiversity Report – Mar 2021 Page 2 of 83 Reg. No: 2007/023691/07 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the case of this study site, the primary grasslands have been minimally disturbed by anthropogenic activities. • Anthropogenic impacts identified within the sub-quaternary catchment included alien vegetation, creation of district roads, vegetation removal along the road, erosion due to bare road surface and edge of road reserve, and instream sedimentation as well as illegal dumping around existing road upgrade and lastly a borrow pit to supply sediment for the road upgrade between Hluvhukani and Welverdiend. • A seasonal wetland system was identified within the study area. • The study site still has a functional role to play in regional ecological functioning and biological functions at the site even though it has been influenced by human-related impacts. The area for the proposed deviation has not been impacted by any antropogenic activity as yet and can be classified as near pristine bushveld. • A 32-m buffer around the wetlands has been allowed as prescribed by NEMA, 1998. These fulfil ecological functions and serve as natural corridors for fauna species and breeding grounds. • According to the DEFF Screening Tool for the proposed site, the plant species combined sensitivity was rated as Medium, while the Combined Terrestrial Biodiversity of the site is Very High. • The wetland was assigned High sensitivity as well as the vegetation sensitivity. • Ecological connectivity between the wetland and grasslands cannot be excluded and culverts should be utilised that allow movement of reptilian and mammalian species. • A water use license should be undertaken as part of the proposed development. Based on the results and conclusions presented in this report, and the outcomes of the field survey, it is the opinion of the specialists that the proposed project can be favourably considered. All mitigation measures provided in this report must nonetheless be adhered to. Even though the site falls within high sensitivity, the deviation if constructed correctly and mitigation measures followed for construction and operational phases will be limited or even negligible. NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd Timbavati Biodiversity Report – Mar 2021 Page 3 of 83 Reg. No: 2007/023691/07 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ..................................................................................... 2 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 3 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 STUDY SITE ........................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3.1 Granite Lowveld .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.4 Scope of work and objectives ............................................................................................................ 12 3.4.1 Biodiversity Assessment ................................................................................................................ 12 3.5 Overview of the Specialist ................................................................................................................. 13 3.6 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................. 14 4 LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES ........................................................................................ 20 4.1 International Legislation and Policy .................................................................................................. 21 4.2 National Level .................................................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Provincial and Municipal Level .......................................................................................................... 23 5 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 24 5.1 Desktop assessment .......................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Biodiversity Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................. 24 5.2.1 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Mapping .......................................................................... 24 5.2.2 Botanical Assessment.................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.3 Faunal Assessment (Mammals & Avifauna) .................................................................................. 26 5.2.4 Herpetology (Reptiles & Amphibians)........................................................................................... 26 5.3 Impact Assessment Methodology ..................................................................................................... 28 5.3.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 28 5.3.2 Identification of Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................... 31 NCC Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd Timbavati Biodiversity Report – Mar 2021 Page 4 of 83 Reg. No: 2007/023691/07 5.3.3 Ascribing Significance to Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................. 32 5.4 Biodiversity and conservation importance ........................................................................................ 32 5.4.1 Conservation Status ...................................................................................................................... 33 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND GAPS ............................................................................................... 34 7 FINDINGS AND RESULTS .................................................................................................. 35 7.1 Habitat and Vegetation Characteristics ............................................................................................. 35 7.2 Assessment of Plant Species of Conservation Concern ..................................................................... 36 7.3 Assessment of Vertebrate Species of Conservation Concern ........................................................... 42 7.3.1 Mammals of high conservation priority ........................................................................................ 42 7.3.2 Birds of high conservation priority ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENDOGENOUS RETROVIRUSES in PRIMATES Katherine Brown Bsc
    ENDOGENOUS RETROVIRUSES IN PRIMATES Katherine Brown BSc, MSc Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 Abstract Numerous endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are found in all mammalian genomes, for example, they are the source of approximately 8% of all human and chimpanzee genetic material. These insertions represent retroviruses which have, by chance, integrated into the germline and so are transmitted vertically from parents to offspring. The human genome is rich in ERVs, which have been characterised in some detail. However, in many non-human primates these insertions have not been well- studied. ERVs are subject to the mutation rate of their host, rather than the faster retrovirus mutation rate, so they change much more slowly than exogenous retroviruses. This means ERVs provide a snapshot of the retroviruses a host has been exposed to during its evolutionary history, including retroviruses which are no longer circulating and for which sequence information would otherwise be lost. ERVs have many effects on their hosts; they can be co-opted for functional roles, they provide regions of sequence similarity where mispairing can occur, their insertion can disrupt genes and they provide regulatory elements for existing genes. Accurate annotation and characterisation of these regions is an important step in interpreting the huge amount of genetic information available for increasing numbers of organisms. This project represents an extensive study into the diversity of ERVs in the genomes of primates and related ERVs in rodents. Lagomorphs (rabbits and hares) and tree shrews are also analysed, as the closest relatives of primates and rodents.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuleaf Kapama 24G Ecology Report
    KAPAMA GAME RESERVE TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT APRIL 2019 REVISED MAY 2021 Prepared for: Peter Velcich NuLeaf Planning and Environmental PostNet Suite 168 Private Bag X 844 Silverton 0127 Prepared by: ECOREX Consulting Ecologists CC Postnet Suite #192, Private Bag X2 Raslouw 0109 Author: Duncan McKenzie Reviewer: Warren McCleland (ECOREX) KAPAMA GAME RESERVE ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT - REVISION (ECOREX) MAY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ 3 ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 4 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ....................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 6 2. OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3. STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Responding to An
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENT PLANT PEST-PATHOGEN COMPLEX ACROSS SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SCALES A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES with an emphasis in ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY by Shannon Colleen Lynch December 2020 The Dissertation of Shannon Colleen Lynch is approved: Professor Gregory S. Gilbert, chair Professor Stacy M. Philpott Professor Andrew Szasz Professor Ingrid M. Parker Quentin Williams Acting Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Shannon Colleen Lynch 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv List of Figures vii Abstract x Dedication xiii Acknowledgements xiv Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 References 10 Chapter 2 – Host Evolutionary Relationships Explain 12 Tree Mortality Caused by a Generalist Pest– Pathogen Complex References 38 Chapter 3 – Microbiome Variation Across a 66 Phylogeographic Range of Tree Hosts Affected by an Emergent Pest–Pathogen Complex References 110 Chapter 4 – On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on 180 Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action References 243 iii LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 Table I Insect vectors and corresponding fungal pathogens causing 47 Fusarium dieback on tree hosts in California, Israel, and South Africa. Table II Phylogenetic signal for each host type measured by D statistic. 48 Table SI Native range and infested distribution of tree and shrub FD- 49 ISHB host species. Chapter 3 Table I Study site attributes. 124 Table II Mean and median richness of microbiota in wood samples 128 collected from FD-ISHB host trees. Table III Fungal endophyte-Fusarium in vitro interaction outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others
    Staude et al. / Metamorphosis 27: S165–S188 S165 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others Reference/ Lepidoptera Host plant Locality rearing no. Taxon Subfamily Family Taxon Family M1148 Anoba angulilinea Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Tshukudu Game melanoxylon Reserve, Hoedspruit M998 Anoba atripuncta Anobinae Erebidae Ormocarpum Fabaceae Tshukudu Game trichocarpum Reserve, Hoedspruit Gv71 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 14HSS52 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 13HSS84 Plecoptera arctinotata Anobinae Erebidae Senegalia caffra Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, Magaliesburg M1020a Plecoptera flaviceps Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Casketts, farm, melanoxylon Hoedspruit M317 Bareia incidens Calpinae Erebidae Ficus lutea Moraceae Casketts, farm, (unplaced as to Hoedspruit tribe) 14HSS87 Egnasia vicaria Calpinae Erebidae Afrocanthium Rubiaceae Dlinsa Forest, (unplaced as to mundianum Eshowe tribe) 12HSS163 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Celtis africana Cannabaceae Golden Valley, (unplaced as to Magaliesburg tribe) M416 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Trema orientalis Cannabaceae Sekororo, Tzaneen (unplaced as to (Fed on Celtis tribe) africana) M743 Lacera alope Calpinae Erebidae Pterolobium Fabaceae Moholoholo Rehab (unplaced as to stellatum Centre, Hoedspruit tribe)
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society and National Museum
    JOURNAL OF THE EAST AFRICA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM 15 October, 1978 Vol. 31 No. 167 A CHECKLIST OF mE SNAKES OF KENYA Stephen Spawls 35 WQodland Rise, Muswell Hill, London NIO, England ABSTRACT Loveridge (1957) lists 161 species and subspecies of snake from East Mrica. Eighty-nine of these belonging to some 41 genera were recorded from Kenya. The new list contains some 106 forms of 46 genera. - Three full species have been deleted from Loveridge's original checklist. Typhlops b. blanfordii has been synonymised with Typhlops I. lineolatus, Typhlops kaimosae has been synonymised with Typhlops angolensis (Roux-Esteve 1974) and Co/uber citeroii has been synonymised with Meizodon semiornatus (Lanza 1963). Of the 20 forms added to the list, 12 are forms collected for the first time in Kenya but occurring outside its political boundaries and one, Atheris desaixi is a new species, the holotype and paratypes being collected within Kenya. There has also been a large number of changes amongst the 89 original species as a result of revisionary systematic studies. This accounts for the other additions to the list. INTRODUCTION The most recent checklist dealing with the snakes of Kenya is Loveridge (1957). Since that date there has been a significant number of developments in the Kenyan herpetological field. This paper intends to update the nomenclature in the part of the checklist that concerns the snakes of Kenya and to extend the list to include all the species now known to occur within the political boundaries of Kenya. It also provides the range of each species within Kenya with specific locality records .
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
    Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated
    [Show full text]
  • Olympus AH Eco Assessment
    FAUNAL AND FLORAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED ERASMUS PARK PHASE 2 TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT, ERASMUSRAND, GAUTENG. Prepared for Nali Sustainability Solutions February 2019 Section C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report author: C. Hooton Report reviewer: K. Marais (Pr. Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 180084 Date: February 2019 Scientific Terrestrial Services CC CC Reg No 2005/122329/23 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 E-mail: [email protected] STS 180084 February 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From the faunal assessment it can be concluded that there are four habitat units encompassed within the study area, namely Senegalia caffra – Vachellia karroo Woodland, Rocky Grassland, Degraded Hyparrhenia Grassland and Freshwater Habitat. These habitat range from moderately-low to moderately high sensitivities Based on the impact assessment, the impacts on faunal habitat, diversity and SCC within the different habitat units varies from low to high significance during the construction and the operational phase of the project prior to mitigation taking place. With effective mitigation implemented, all impacts may be reduced to very-low to medium-low levels. It is the opinion of the ecologists that this study provides the relevant information required in order to implement an Integrated Environmental Management (IEM) plan and to ensure that the best long-term use of the ecological resources in the study area will be made in support of the principle of sustainable development. Scientific Terrestrial Services (STS) was appointed to conduct a faunal and floral ecological assessment for the proposed Erasmus Park development on the remaining extent of the farm Waterkloof 378 JR, Erasmusrand, Gauteng Province (hereafter referred to as the ‘study area’).
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Zambia Malawi Species Checklist Africa Vegetation Map
    ZIMBABWE ZAMBIA MALAWI SPECIES CHECKLIST AFRICA VEGETATION MAP BIOMES DeserT (Namib; Sahara; Danakil) Semi-deserT (Karoo; Sahel; Chalbi) Arid SAvannah (Kalahari; Masai Steppe; Ogaden) Grassland (Highveld; Abyssinian) SEYCHELLES Mediterranean SCruB / Fynbos East AFrican Coastal FOrest & SCruB DrY Woodland (including Mopane) Moist woodland (including Miombo) Tropical Rainforest (Congo Basin; upper Guinea) AFrO-Montane FOrest & Grassland (Drakensberg; Nyika; Albertine rift; Abyssinian Highlands) Granitic Indian Ocean IslandS (Seychelles) INTRODUCTION The idea of this booklet is to enable you, as a Wilderness guest, to keep a detailed record of the mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians that you observe during your travels. It also serves as a compact record of your African journey for future reference that hopefully sparks interest in other wildlife spheres when you return home or when travelling elsewhere on our fragile planet. Although always exciting to see, especially for the first-time Africa visitor, once you move beyond the cliché of the ‘Big Five’ you will soon realise that our wilderness areas offer much more than certain flagship animal species. Africa’s large mammals are certainly a big attraction that one never tires of, but it’s often the smaller mammals, diverse birdlife and incredible reptiles that draw one back again and again for another unparalleled visit. Seeing a breeding herd of elephant for instance will always be special but there is a certain thrill in seeing a Lichtenstein’s hartebeest, cheetah or a Lilian’s lovebird – to name but a few. As a globally discerning traveller, look beyond the obvious, and challenge yourself to learn as much about all wildlife aspects and the ecosystems through which you will travel on your safari.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Density of Galago Moholi at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, South Africa
    African Primates 12: 1-8 (2017)/ 1 Species Density of Galago moholi at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, South Africa Ian S. Ray1,2,3, Brandi T. Wren2,4, and Evelyn J. Bowers1 1Department of Anthropology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN USA; 2Applied Behavioural Ecology and Ecosystem Research Unit, University of South Africa; 3Department of Social Sciences, Community College of Aurora, Aurora, Colorado USA;4Department of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA Abstract: Galagos are a poorly studied group of nocturnal primates endemic to sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in regard to distribution in southern Africa. We conducted a population survey of Galago moholi along the road system of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve in Mpumalanga, South Africa, during the winter months of June and July, 2011. Results from 151 km of transects that were driven over 23 survey hours indicate that the population density of G. moholi is several times lower than previously reported in similar areas. We estimate the population density at Loskop Dam to be between 1.4 and 5.1 animals/km2, suggesting a population estimate for the entire reserve of 296-1029 animals. This number is substantially lower than the expected density of 95 animals/km2 and total population of 20,000 animals based on previously published density estimates. Low population density may be due to an unknown environmental condition that, in addition, excludes other Galago species from the reserve. Key words: Galago, population density, strepsirrhine, bushbaby INTRODUCTION Bushbabies, or galagos, are small nocturnal Galago moholi averages 158 g and 438 mm in primates endemic to sub-Saharan Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats 0-Year
    Table S1: The total number of recorded species per habitat (in brackets) and the number of shared species across habitats. 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- Restored Habitats Reference old old old combined 0-year-old (36 spp.) - 25 spp. 24 spp. - 25 spp. 3-year-old (40 spp.) 25 spp. - 28 spp. - 30 spp. 5-year-old (44 spp.) 24 spp. 28 spp. - - 40 spp. Restored combined (59 - - - - 49 spp. spp.) Reference (70 spp.) 25 spp. 30 spp. 40 spp. 49 spp. - Table S2: Checklist of plant species found in the restored and reference habitats. Species Family Upland area Lowland area 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- 0-year- 3-year- 5-year- old old old Reference old old old Reference habitat habitat habitat habiat habitat habitat habitat habitat Harpephyllum caffrum Bernh. Anacardiaceae X X X X X X X - Protorhus longifolia (Bernh.) Engl. Anacardiaceae - X X X - - - X Sclerocrya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro Anacardiaceae - - - - - - - - Searsia chirindensis (Baker f.) Moffett Anacardiaceae - - X X - X X X Searsia dentata (Thunb.) F.A.Barkley Anacardiaceae - - - - - - - - Searsia lucida (L.) F.A.Barkley Anacardiaceae X - - - - X - - Searsia pentheri (Zahlbr.) Moffett Anacardiaceae - - X - - - - X Searsia rehmanniana (Engl.) Moffet Anacardiaceae X - - X - X X - Annona senegalensi Pers. Annonaceae - - - - - - - - Rauvolfia caffra Sond. Apocynaceae X X - X - - - X Tabernaemontana ventricosa Hochst. ex A.DC. Apocynaceae X X - X - - - X Cussonia spicata Thunb. Araliaceae - - - - - - - - Cussonia zuluensis Strey Araliaceae - - - X - - X - Phoenix reclinata Jacq. Arecaceae X X - - - - X X Aloe ferox Mill. Asphodelaceae - - X - - - X - Brachylaena discolor DC. Asteraceae X X X - - X - - Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Flora Species Recorded
    APPENDIX A FLORA SPECIES RECORDED Environmental Scoping Report Plant Species Identified During Field Survey (April 2017) Trees Shrubs Forbs Grasses Cyperoids Acacia sieberiana Gnidia kraussiana Achyranthes Andropogon Cyperus digitatus aspera eucomus Albizia antunesiana Blumea alata Amaranthus Andropogon Cyperus hybridus gayanus esculentus Brachystegia Eriosema ellipticum Bidens biternata Aristida junciformis Cyperus tenax spiciformis Burkea africana Eriosema Bidens pilosa Arundinella Kylinga erecta engleranum nepalensis Combretum molle Euclea crispa C. albida Brachiaria deflexa Pycreus aethiops Cussonia arborea Gnidia kraussiana Ceratotheca triloba Cynodon dactylon Typha latifolius Ekebergia Helichrysum Conyza albida Dactyloctenium benguelensis kraussii aegyptium Faurea speciosa Indigofera arrecta Conyza welwitschii Digitaria scalarum Julbemardia Lantana camara Datura stramonium Eleusine indica globiflora Kigellia africana Leptactina Euphorbia Eragrostis benguelensis cyparissoides capensis Ochna puhra Lippia javanica Haumaniastrum Eragrostis sericeum chapelieri Ozoroa insignis Lopholaena Helichrysum Eragrostis spp. coriifolia species Parinari Maytenus Kniphofia Hemarthria curatellifolia heterophylla linearifolia altissima Strychnos spinosa Maytenus Oldenlandia Heteropogon senegalensis corymbosa contortus Vangueria infausta Pavetta Oldenlandia Hyparrhenia schumanniana herbacea filipendula Senna Rhynchosia Polygonum Hyperthelia didymobotrya resinosa senegalense dissoluta Ranunculus Melinis repens multifidus Senecio strictifolius Monocymbium
    [Show full text]
  • Eleutherodactylus Ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) Predation Tobias Eisenberg
    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Biology Faculty Publications Biology 9-2007 Eleutherodactylus ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) Predation Tobias Eisenberg Twan Leenders Sacred Heart University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/bio_fac Part of the Population Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Eisenberg, T. & Leenders, T. (2007). Eleutherodactylus ridens (Pygmy Rainfrog) predation. Herpetological Review, 38(3), 323. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. SSAR Officers (2007) HERPETOLOGICAL REVIEW President The Quarterly News-Journal of the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles ROY MCDIARMID USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Editor Managing Editor National Museum of Natural History ROBERT W. HANSEN THOMAS F. TYNING Washington, DC 20560, USA 16333 Deer Path Lane Berkshire Community College Clovis, California 93619-9735, USA 1350 West Street President-elect [email protected] Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201, USA BRIAN CROTHER [email protected] Department of Biological Sciences Southeastern Louisiana University Associate Editors Hammond, Louisiana 70402, USA ROBERT E. ESPINOZA CHRISTOPHER A. PHILLIPS DEANNA H. OLSON California State University, Northridge Illinois Natural History Survey USDA Forestry Science Lab Secretary MARION R. PREEST ROBERT N. REED MICHAEL S. GRACE R. BRENT THOMAS Joint Science Department USGS Fort Collins Science Center Florida Institute of Technology Emporia State University The Claremont Colleges Claremont, California 91711, USA EMILY N. TAYLOR GUNTHER KÖHLER MEREDITH J. MAHONEY California Polytechnic State University Forschungsinstitut und Illinois State Museum Naturmuseum Senckenberg Treasurer KIRSTEN E.
    [Show full text]