Lecture 36. The Rule

P = number of phases C = number of components (chemically independent constituents) F = number of degrees of freedom xC,P = the mole fraction of component C in phase P

The variables used to describe a system in equilibrium:

x11, x21, x31,...,xC −1,1 phase 1

x12 , x22 , x32 ,..., xC−1,2 phase 2

x1P , x2P , x3P ,...,xC−1,P phase P T,P

Total number of variables = P(C-1) + 2

Constraints on the system: m11 = m12 = m13 =…= m1,P P - 1 relations m21 = m22 = m23 =…= m2,P P - 1 relations mC,1 = mC,2 = mC,3 =…= mC,P P - 1 relations 1 Total number of constraints = C(P - 1)

Degrees of freedom = variables - constraints

F=P(C- 1) + 2 - C(P - 1) F=C- P+2

Single Component Systems: F = 3 - P

In single phase regions, F = 2. Both T and P may vary.

At the equilibrium between two phases, F = 1. Changing T requires a change in P, and vice versa.

At the , F = 0. Tt and Pt are unique.

2 Four phases cannot be in equilibrium (for a single component.)

Two Component Systems: F = 4 - P

The possible phases are the , two immiscible (or partially miscible) phases, and two phases. (Of course, they don’t have to all exist. The might turn out to be miscible for all compositions.)

3 Liquid-Vapor Equilibrium

Possible degrees of freedom: T, P, mole fraction of A xA = mole fraction of A in the liquid yA = mole fraction of A in the vapor zA = overall mole fraction of A (for the entire system)

We can plot either T vs zA holding P constant, or P vs zA holding T constant.

Let A be the more volatile substance:

* * PA >PB and Tb,A

Pressure-composition diagrams Fix the at some value, T. Assume Raoult’s Law:

* * P=PA xA +PB xB

* * * * * P=PA xA +PB (1 - xA)=PB + (PA - PB )xA

4 Composition of the vapor

P x P* y = A = A A > x A * + ()* − * A P PB PA PB x A

P x P* y = B = B B < x B * + ()* − * B P PB PA PB xA

Point a: One phase, F = 3 (T, P, xA)

Point b: Liquid starts to vaporize, F = 2 (T,P; xA not free.) xA = zb,yA = yb” Vapor is rich in A. Point c: Liquid has lost so much A that its composition is xA = xc’. The vapor is now poorer in A, yA = yc”

Ratio of moles in the two phases is given by the lever rule: n ′′ liq = cc ′ nvap cc

5 Pointd:Liquidisalmostallgone,xA = xd’,yA = yd =zA

For points below d, only the vapor is present (F=3).

Numerical example: -toluene at 20 C Exercise 8.4b. Let B = toluene and A = benzene.

* * Given: PA = 74 Torr, PB = 22 Torr, zA =0.5

Q. At what does the begin to boil? A. At point b, P = 0.5x22 + 0.5x74 = 48 Torr.

Q. What is the composition of the vapor at this point? A. PB = 0.5x22 = 11, PA = 0.5x74 = 37, yA = 37/48 = 0.77

Q. What is the composition and of the liquid when the last few drops of liquid boil? A. Point d.

74x y = z = 0.5 = A A A + − 74xA 22(1 xA )

xA = 0.229, xB =0.771

P = 0.229x74 + 0.771x22= 33.9 Torr

6 Lecture 37. Construction of the Temperature- Composition Diagram

Fix the total pressure at some chosen value, P. does not occur at a unique temperature, but rather over a range of . (Contrast with a pure substance.)

The vapor pressure curve is determined by the liquid composition:

P=PA(T) + PB(T)

PA(T) is the vapor pressure of pure A at temperature T.

7 Assume Raoult’s Law:

= * + * P xA PA (T) xB PB (T) = * + − * xAPA (T) (1 xA )PB (T) = * + * − * PB (T ) xA (PA (T ) PB (T ))

The vapor pressure pure liquid A at any temperature T is given by the Clapeyron-Clausius equation:

 *  ∆H    PA (T)  = − vap,A  1 − 1  ln *     PA (T0 )  R T T0 

* PA (T0 ) =1atm,T0 = normal of A. The same reasoning applies to substance B.

* * Once we have PA (T ) and PB (T ) , Raoult’s Law gives us xA as a unique function of T and P. This allows us to construct the liquid curve.

8 Composition of the vapor:

P x P* (T) y = A = A A A P P ∆H  1 1  * − vap  −  y P (T ) RT  T T  A = A = e  b, A  xA P

This result is equivalent to

µ * + = µ * + A,vap RT ln y A A,liq RT ln xA

This last result is the starting point for the boiling point elevation formula, except that there we assume yA =1.

9 Recipe for construction of the :

1. Calculate Tb,A and Tb,B at the pressure of the diagram.

2. Choose a temperature Tb,A

* * 3. Calculate PA (T ) and PB (T ).

P − P* (T ) x = B 4. A * − * PA (T ) PB (T )

= * 5. y A x APA (T)/P.

10 Cooling of a vapor mixture

Point a. Pure vapor, yA =zA

Point b. Vapor begins to condense at xA =zb’,yA =zA =zb

Point c. Comparable amounts of the two phases are n ′ vapor = cc present. Lever rule: ′′ nliquid cc

Point d. Vapor is almost all gone; xA =zd’ =zA,yA =zd”

Point e. Only liquid is present.

11

Point a. Mixture starts to boil, with xA =zA,yA =zb

Points b-c. Vapor is condensed to form a liquid with xA=zb =zc

Point c. The liquid that was collected in the previous step is boiled to form a vapor with xA=zd

Condensation of the last bit of vapor produces a liquid very rich in either A (if Tb,A Tb,B on the right).

12 Non-ideal

Left: Impossible phase diagram, because at Pmax,where the liquid of this composition just starts to boil, there is no corresponding point on the vapor curve. (There is no tie line.)

The vapor should always lie below the liquid in a pressure-composition diagram. At an extremum they must touch.

Center: Vapor pressure reaches a maximum because of repulsion between A and B. This is an , where the liquid and vapor have the same composition. (Note an error in the drawing: The vapor curve does not have a cusp, but rather is tangent to the liquid curve.)

Right: Vapor pressure reaches a minimum because of attraction between A and B. This is also an azeotrope.

13 Distillation of non-ideal solutions

Left diagram: low boiling azeotrope. A of composition za first boils at Ta. The vapor comes off with composition zb. It is condensed and then boils at Tc

The final vapor to come off has the azeotropic composition, and the remaining liquid is enriched in B (or A, depending on which side of the azeotrope the process started).

Right diagram: high boiling azeotrope. As before, za first boils at Ta

The final vapor to come off is enriched in B (or A), and the remaining liquid has the azeotropic composition.

14 Equilibrium between immiscible liquids

Upper Critical Lower Critical Double Critical Temperature Temperature Temperature

The two phase region is always described by a tie line. It is a “no man’s land.”

15 Boiling of immiscible liquids

Melting of immiscible

Mixture of non-reactive Solids A and B react to solids. form compound AB.

16 Lecture 38. Equilibrium Constants

Consider the following reaction:

H2 +Cl2 Ø 2HCl

Does it occur spontaneously? Let’s calculate DG for one mole of reaction.

∆ 0 = G f (H 2 ) 0 ∆ 0 = G f (Cl2 ) 0 ∆ 0 = − G f (HCl) 95.30kJ / mol ∆ 0 = − Gr 190.6

It seems that the reaction occurs spontaneously. But what if we start with pure HCl. Shouldn’t some of it react to form H2 and Cl2?

17 To determine when the reaction occurs spontaneously, we must take the partial into account:

 P  ∆G (Cl ) = 0 + RT ln Cl2  f 2  P o   Cl2   P  ∆ = − +  HCl  G f (HCl) 95.30 RT ln o   PHCl   P 2  P   P  ∆ = − + HCl −  H 2  −  Cl2  Gr 190.6 RT ln  RT ln  RT ln   P0   Po   Po 

At equilibrium, DGr =0.Thatis,

 2   PHCl   (P o ) 2   P 2  190.6 = −∆G o = RT ln = RT ln HCl  r  P P    H 2 Cl2  PH PCl    2 2  P o P o 

= −∆ 0 RT ln K P Gr

ln KP = 76.93 at 298 K

33 KP =2.57x10

18 So what happens if we start with pure HCl?

P P = P = 0 Suppose that initially HCl =1barand H2 Cl2

P = 1− 2z P = P = z At equilibrium, HCl and H 2 Cl2

()1− 2z 2 = 2.57x1033 z2

1 ≈ 2.57x1033 z2

z=1.97 x 10-17

This reaction goes nearly to completion. But this won’t be the case at higher T.

19 Another example:

N2O4 F 2NO2

∆ 0 = G f 97.89 and 51.31 kJ/mol

∆ 0 = − = Gr 2x51.31 97.89 47.30

ln KP = -4.730/RT = 1.909

 2 PNO  2   Po  P2 = = = NO2 K P 0.148 o PN O P P 2 4 N2O4 Po

What is the composition of 2 bar of this material?

Let x be the mole fraction of NO2.

()xP 2 K = P ()1− x PPo

Noting that Po =1bar,

20 2 2 x P =KPP - KPxP

2 2 P x +KPPx - KPP=0

− K P ± K 2 P2 + 4K P3 x = P P P 2P2

For P = 2 bar, x = 0.238. (Only the + sign is physically meaningful.)ForP=0.01bar,x=0.940

What is the composition of a very low pressure ?

− K P + K P 1+ 4P / K x = P P P 2P2

− + ()+ − 2 2 ≈ K P P KP P 1 2P / KP P / 2K P = − P x 2 1 2P 2K P

(Here we used the series (1+e)1/2 =1+e/2 -e2/8 + …)

For P = 0.01 bar bar, x ≈ 0.966

21 Suppose you somehow arranged to start with pure N2O4. What is the composition of an equilibrium mixture?

N2O4 NO2 Initial P0 0 Final P0-z 2z

(2z)2 K = P − P0 z

For KP = 0.148 and P0 =1bar,z=0.175 P = 1− 0.175 = 0.825 N 2O4 P = 2x0.175 = 0.349 NO2

Ptot =1.1744 x = 0.349 /1.1744 = 0.297 NO2

22 The book defines the fraction of dissociation, a.

N2O4 NO2 Initial no. N0 moles Final no. (1-a)n 2an moles −α −α α Final mole 1 = 1 2 fraction 1−α + 2α 1+α 1+α

P2 x2 P2 4α 2P K = NO2 = NO2 = P P x P 1−α 2 N 2O4 N 2O4

But P = (1+ a)P0

Substituting this result gives the same equation as before. This method is useful if the total pressure is specified.

How does KP change if P is increased?

How does the composition change if P is increased?

23 More complex stochiometry:

2H2S+CH4 F 4H2 +CS2

4  P   P  CS  H 2   2   o   o   P   P  K = P 2  P   P  CH  H 2 S   4   o   o   P   P  Set Po =1bar,sothat

P4 P K = H 2 CS 2 P P P H 2 S CH 4

Problem: Given that T = 700 C and P = 762 Torr Initial Final H2S 11.02 mmol CH4 5.48 H2 0 CS2 00.711

o Find KP and DGr

24 Solution:

2H2S+CH4 F 4H2 +CS2

4    P  PCS  H2   2   o   o  4  P   P  x x P2 K = = H2 CS2 P  2  P  x2 x (P0 )2 P CH H2S CH4  H2S   4   o   o   P   P  Set Po =1bar,sothat

= 2 KP KxP

Problem: Given that T = 700 C and P = 762 Torr = 1.012 bar Initial Final x H2S 11.02 mmol 9.598 0.536 CH4 5.48 4.769 0.266 H2 0 2.844 0.159 CS2 00.7110.040

o Find KP and DGr -4 Kx = 3.34x10 -4 KP = 3.43 x10 0 DGr = -RT lnKP = 94.5 kJ/mol

25 Lecture 39. Equilibrium Constants II

Derivation of KP for H2 +Cl2 F 2HCl

G = µ n + µ n + 2µ n m H 2 H 2 Cl2 Cl2 HCl HCl dG = µ dn + µ dn + 2µ dn m H 2 H 2 Cl2 Cl2 HCl HCl

Let x indicate the “extent” of reaction.Itisadevicefor handling the stochiometry of the reaction. dn = −dξ H 2 dn = −dξ Cl2 = ξ dnHCl 2d

The chemical potentials are  P  µ = ∆ o +  H 2  H G f ,m (H 2 ) RT ln  2  P o   P  µ = ∆ o +  Cl2  Cl G f ,m (Cl2 ) RT ln  2  Po   P  µ = ∆Go (HCl) + RT ln HCl  HCl f ,m  Po 

26 Putting all the pieces together:

 P   P  = −∆ o −  H 2  − ∆ o −  Cl2  dGm { G f ,m (H 2 ) RT ln  G f ,m (Cl2 ) RT ln   P o   P o   P  + 2∆G o (HCl) + 2RT ln HCl }dξ f ,m  P o  dG  P 2  m = ∆G o + RT ln HCl  dξ r  P P   H 2 Cl2 

At equilibrium, dG m = 0 dξ = −∆ o RT ln K P Gr

 P2  K =  HCl  P  P P   H2 Cl2 

27 Note that KP is independent of pressure (for ideal ). This does not mean that the equilibrium ratios of mole fractions or concentrations are independent of P.

Let’s use 2H2S+CH4 as an example.

P = x P CS 2 CS 2 etc.

4 4  P   P  x   x   2 H2 o CS2 o   =  P   P  = P K P K x    P 2  P   Po  x2   x   H2S  Po  CH4  Po 

In general, ∆ν  P  K = K   P x  Po 

28 For example, for N2O4 F 2N2O  P  K = K   P x  Po  2 −∆ o x K e Gr ,m / RT K = N2O = P = − x x P P N2O4

= lim xN O 0 P→0 2 4

= lim xNO 0 P→∞ 2

Increasing the pressure reduces the total number of moles, in accord with le Chatlier’s principle.

29 Temperature dependence of KP

∆Go ln K = − r,m P RT

d(∆G o / T ) d ln K P = − 1 r,m dT R dT

Gibbs-Helmholtz equation:

∆H o d ln K P = 1 r,m dT R T 2

∆H o dT d ln K = r,m P R T 2

Van’t Hoff equation:

  ∆ o   K (T ) H r,m 1 1 ln P 2  = −  −   K P (T1 )  R  T2 T1 

30 ∆ o < Suppose that the reaction is exothermic, so that H r 0. For T2 >T1,

 K (T )  ln P 2  < 0  K P (T1 ) 

In other words, increasing T shifts the reaction to the left. Otherwise, the reaction would “run away,” in accord with le Chatlier.

31 Example of H2 +Cl2 F 2HCl

∆ o = − H r,m 184.62 kJ/mol

At 5000 K (assuming that DHisconstant),

184,620  1 1  ln K (5000K) = 76.93 +  −  = 6.86 P 8.31451 5000 298 

KP = 952

Nowifwestartoffwith1barofpureHCl,the equilibrium mixture contains 0.032 bar of H2 and 0.032 bar of Cl2.

32 How do real gases and condensed phases behave?

µ = µ o + i i RT ln ai

o = lim f i Pi Gases:ai =fi/P , P→0

lim a = x Solvent: a = g x , → A A A A A x A 1

lim a = x Solute:a =P /K = g x , → B B B B B B B xB 0

= γ ′ We can also write aB BbB

Note: n x = B B + nA nB

= nB bB nAM A

The activity of a pure solid or liquid is 1. Why? Because its activity doesn’t change, and no “correction term” is needed.

33 Example: Liquid-vapor equilibrium:

CCl4(liq) F CCl4(vapor) at 298 K

a P / P o K = vapor = vapor = P vapor in bar aliq 1

o DG vap,m(298) = 4.46 kJ/mol

∆Go 4460 ln K = − vap,m = − = −1.80 RT 8.314x298

K = 0.165 fl vapor pressure = 124 Torr

Note: From the van’t Hoff equation,

∆G 0 (T )   vap = ∆ 0  1 − 1  H vap   RT  T Tb 

This is the same result that we get from the Clapeyron- Clausius equation.

34 Lecture 40. Equilibrium of Elecytrolytes

Solubility Product

For a saturated solution,

AgCl(s) Ø Ag+(aq) + Cl-(aq)

γ +b + γ −b − K = Ag Cl SP (bo )2

-10 b + = b − Given that K=1.8x10 and Ag Cl , and assuming that g+g- =1,

b + Ag = K bo SP −5 + = bAg 1.35x10 mol/Kg

35 Debye-Híckel limiting law:

γ = − log`10 ± | z+ z− | A I

I = ionic strength of the solution (dimensionless) A = 0.50926 for at 25 C.

= 1 2 o I ∑ zi (bi / b ) 2 i zi = charge number of ion i

-5 Here, z+ =1,z- = -1, I = b @ 1.35x10 log10 g≤ = -0.00187 g≤ = 0.9957

−5 + = bAg 1.35x10 mol/Kg

36 Example: Determine the solubility of Ni3(PO4)2,given -32 that KSP = 4.74x10 . Assume first that g≤ =1.

One mole of electrolyte produces 3 moles of Ni+ and 2+ two moles of PO4 . Let b = the molality of the Ni3(PO4)2 that gets dissolved. The activity of the 2+ dissolved Ni is 3g+b, and the activity of the 2- dissolved PO4 is 3g-b.

3 2 5   b    b   b  K = 3γ +   2γ −   =108  SP   bo    bo   bo 

b = 2.13x10-7 mol/kg

Now calculate the ionic strength. 2 2 -6 z+ =2,z- = 3I = 0.5{3b(2) + 2b(3) } = 3.196x10

logγ ± = −0.50926(2)(3) I = −0.005463

γ 5 = γ 3γ 2 ± + − g≤ =0.9875  5 5  b  K = 108γ ±   SP  bo 

b = 2.16x10-7 mol/kg

37 Ionization of water

Water: + - 2H2O F H3O +OH

+ − a(H O )a(OH ) + − + = 3 = = 2 Kw 2 [H3O ][OH ] [H3O ] [a(H 2O)]

Note: pH meters are calibrated for activity.

+ = [H3O ] KW

0 -13.997 -14 KW(25 C) = 10 @ 10

+ -7 [H3O ]=10 M

+ pH = -log10[H3O ]=7

0 What is Kw at 0 C?

We need DG(00C) for acid dissociation. Must correct for DCP.

 ∆  ∆  G  = − H d 2 dT  T  T

38 ∆ = ∆ + ∆ ()− H (T ) H (T0 ) CP T T0

     ∆ = T ∆ + ∆ − T + ∆ − −  T  G(T ) G(T0 ) H (T0 )1  CP T T0 T ln  T0  T0    T0 

DG(250C) = 79.868 kj/mol

DH(250C) = 56.563 kj/mol

0 DCP(25 C) = 19.7 j/mol/deg

DG(00C) = 78.127 kj/mol

-15 Kw = 1.198x10

pH = 7.47

39 Lecture 42. Acid-Base Equilibria

Strong acid: + - HA + H2O Ø H3O +A

+ -7 [H3O ]=[HA]0 >> 10

pH = - log[HA]0

Strong base: - + [OH ]>>[H3O ]

+ - [H3O ]=KW/[OH ]

pH = pKW +log[B]

Weak acid: + - HA + H2O F H3O +A

+ − + 2 = [H3O ][A ] ≈ [H3O ] Ka [HA] [HA]0

+ = >> −7 [H3O ] Ka[HA]0 10

pH = ½ pKa - ½ logA0

40 Weak base:

- + - A +H2O Ø H3O +OH

[HA][OH − ] [OH − ]2 K = ≈ b [A− ] [A− ]

KaKb =Kw

− = = [OH ] KbB0 B0Kw / Ka

+ = − = [H3O ] Kw /[OH ] KwKa / B0

pH = ½ pKw +½pKa - log B0

41 Problem 9.16: Acid rain. Calculate the pH of rainwater caused by dissolved CO2,given:

P = 3.6x10−4 atm CO2 6 KH =1.25x10 Torr pKa =6.37

The reaction involved is

- + H2CO3(aq) + H2O(liq) F H2CO3 (aq) + H3O (aq)

− + + 2 K = [H 2CO3 ][H3O ] ≈ [H3O ] a [H 2CO3 ] [H 2CO3 ]

pKa = 2pH + log[H2CO3]

Assume that [H2CO3]=[CO2] in the liquid phase.

n n [CO ] [CO ] x = CO2 ≈ CO2 = 2 = 2 CO2 n + n n [H O] 1000/18.015 CO2 H 2O H 2O 2

[CO ] = x / 0.018015 2 CO2

42 x We calculate CO2 using Henry’s law.

P = K x CO2 H CO2

−4 P 3.6x10 x760 − x = CO2 = = 2.2x10 7 CO2 6 K H 1.25x10

−7 2.2x10 − [CO ] = =1.2x10 5 M 2 0.018015

43 Exact solution: 4 equations with 4 unknowns

+ - - x=[H3O ], y = [OH ], z = [A ], A = [AH]

Kw =xy

Ka =xz/A

x=y+z

A=A0 - z

Solution: y=x- z

Kw =x(x-z) fl z=x- Kw/x

x 2 − K x 3 − K x K = w = w a K A x − x 2 + K K A − x − w 0 a w 0 x

3 − = − 2 + x K w x K a A0 x K a x K a K w

pH= ½ pKa - ½log(1.2x10-5)=5.645

44 Titration of a Weak Acid with a Strong Base

Chemical equations:

BOH Ø B+ +OH-

- - OH +HAØ H2O+A

+ - HA + H2O F H3O +A

- - A +H2O F HA + OH

+ - + - Unknowns: HA, H3O ,A ,B,OH

Algebraic equations: [H O + ][A− ] K = 3 a [HA]

[HA][OH − ] K = b [A− ]

(note: KaKb =Kw)

+ + - - H3O +B =A +OH

- [HA] = [HA]0 +[A ]

45 + [B ] = [BOH]0 =S

Initial point: pH = ½ pKa - ½logA0

Before the equivalence point:

- - OH +HAØ H2O+A

+ - HA + H2O F H3O +A

[A-]=S

[HA] = A0 - S

(S is the concentration of produced by + - BOH + HA Ø H2O+BA )

+ − [H O ][A ] + S K = 3 = [H O ] a 3 − [HA] A0 S

pH = pKa - log((A0 - S)/S)

46 At the equivalence point:

HA has been all converted, and the relevant chemical - - equation is A +H2O F HA + OH

[HA][OH − ] [OH − ]2 K = = b [A− ] S

− = = 1/ 2 [OH ] SKb [S(K w / K a )]

pOH = ½ pKw - ½pKa - ½logS=pKw - pH

pH = ½ pKa +½pKw +½logS

(Exercise: Work out the corresponding equation for titration of a weak base by a strong acid.)

End point:

+ - [H3O ]=Kw/[OH ]=Kw/(B0-A0)

pH = pKw +log(B0-A0)

47 Lecture 43. Standard States

The choice of standard state is arbitrary. It affects the value of K, but not what you actually observe in the lab.

Gas: 1 bar Liquid or solid: the pure material Solute, including H+:1M H+ in biochemical reactions: 10-7 M(i.e.,pH7)

Suppose you lived on a planet where the atmospheric pressure is l bar. You my choose to use as your standard a pressure of l bar. How does this affect m and KP?  λPo  µ′o = µ o + RT ln  = µ o + RT lnλ  Po 

48 For the conditions of your experiment,  P  µ = µ o + RT ln   Po   P λPo  = µ′o − RT ln λ + RT ln   λPo Po   P  = µ′o − RT ln λ + RT ln  + RT ln λ  λPo   P  = µ′o + RT ln   P′o 

For the reaction aA + bB F cC + dD ,

∆ ′o = ∆ o + + − − λ = ∆ o + ∆ν λ Gr,m Gr,m (c d a b)RT ln Gr,m RT ln

 P c  P d  C   D  λ o λ o ′ =  P   P  = λ−∆ν KP K P  P a  P b  A   B   λPo   λPo  A reaction that is at equilibrium at Po will not be at equilibrium at P′o. \ This idea applies also to ionic equilibria. Normally we choose for the standard state co =1M. But for biochemical systems, we choose for H+

c′o = 10−7 M

49 + + +  []H  µ(H ) = µ o (H ) + RT ln a = 0 + RT ln  = −2.302RT ⋅ pH  co 

 []+  µ′ + =  H  = µ + − (H ) RT ln −  (H ) 2.302RT 10 7 co 

For a reaction A + nH+ Ø P

∆ ′o = ∆ o + ν ⋅ Gr,m Gr,m 7 2.303RT

50 LN–10

3.091 – Introduction to Solid State Chemistry

Lecture Notes No. 10

PHASE EQUILIBRIA AND PHASE DIAGRAMS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Sources for Further Reading: 1. Campbell, J.A., Why Do Chemical Reactions Occur?, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965. (Paperback) 2. Barrow, G.M., , McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973. 3. Hägg, G., General and Inorganic Chemistry, Wiley, 1969. 4. Henish, H., Roy, R., and Cross, L.E., Phase Transitions, Pergamon, 1973. 5. Reisman, A., Phase Equilibria, Academic Press, 1970. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

PART A: PHASE EQUILIBRIA AND PHASE DIAGRAMS

Phase diagrams are one of the most important sources of information concerning the behavior of elements, compounds and solutions. They provide us with the knowledge of phase composition and phase stability as a function of temperature (T), pressure (P) and composition (C). Furthermore, they permit us to study and control important processes such as , solidification, sintering, purification, growth and doping of single crystals for technological and other applications. Although phase diagrams provide information about systems at equilibrium, they can also assist in predicting phase relations, compositional changes and structures in systems not at equilibrium.

1. GASES, LIQUIDS AND SOLIDS

Any material (elemental or compound) can exist as a gas, a liquid or a solid, depending on the relative magnitude of the attractive interatomic or intermolecular forces vs the disruptive thermal forces. It is thus clear that the stability (existence) of the different

1 LN–10

states of aggregation, which are referred to as phases, is a function of temperature and pressure (since with increased pressure the atoms, for exampled of a gas phase, are closer spaced and thus subject to increased interatomic attraction).

In general terms, a “phase” is a homogeneous, physically distinct, mechanically separable portion of a material with a given chemical composition. To illustrate this definition, let us look at a few examples of common multi-phase systems. Ice cubes in water constitute a two-phase system (ice and liquid water), unless we include the vapor above the glass in our system, which would make it a three-phase system. A mixture of oil and water would also be a two-phase system. Just as oil and water represent two distinct liquid phases, two regions of a solid with distinctly different composition or structure separated by boundaries represent two solid phases.

If we look at a one-component system, such as liquid water, we recognize that because of the energy distribution of the water molecules, some water molecules will always

possess sufficient energy to overcome the attractive forces on the surface of H2O and enter into the gas phase. If thermal energy is continuously supplied to a liquid in an open container, the supply of high energy molecules (which leave the liquid phase) is replenished and the temperature remains constant – otherwise the loss of high energy molecules will lower the temperature of the system. The total quantity of necessary to completely “vaporize” one mole of a liquid at its boiling point is called its

molar heat of vaporization, designated by ΔHV. Similarly, the heat required to completely melt one mole of a solid (the heat required to break the bonds established in the solid phase) is called the (latent) heat of fusion (ΔHV).

Visualize a liquid in a sealed container with some space above the liquid surface. Again, some of the most energetic liquid molecules will leave the liquid phase and form a “gas phase” above the liquid. Since gas molecules will thus accumulate in the gas phase (at a constant temperature), it is inevitable that as a result of collisions in the gas

2 LN–10

phase some molecules will re-enter the liquid phase and a situation will be established whereby the rate of evaporation will equal the rate of condensation – i.e., a dynamic equilibrium between the liquid and gas phase will exist. The established pressure in the gas phase is referred to as the equilibrium vapor pressure, which is normally significantly less for solids than for liquids.

For obvious reasons it is desirable to know for any given material the conditions (P, T) under which the solid state, the liquid state and the gaseous state are stable, as well as the conditions under which the solid and liquid phases may coexist. These conditions

are graphically presented in equilibrium phase diagrams, which can be experimentally determined.

2. THE ONE-COMPONENT PHASE DIAGRAM

Figure 1 illustrates the temperatures and pressures at which water can exist as a solid, liquid or vapor. The curves represent the points at which two of the phases coexist in equilibrium. At the point Tt vapor, liquid and solid coexist in equilibrium. In the fields of the diagram (phase fields) only one phase exists. Although a diagram of this kind delineates the boundaries of the phase fields, it does not indicate the quantity of any phase present.

It is of interest to consider the slope of the liquid/solid phase line of the H2O phase diagram. It can readily be seen that if ice – say at –2°C – is subjected to high

pressures, it will transform to liquid H2O. (An ice skater will skate not on ice, but on water.) This particular pressure sensitivity (reflected in the slope of the solid/liquid phase line) is characteristic for materials which have a higher coordination number in

the liquid than in the solid phase (H2O, Bi, Si, Ge). Metals, for example have an opposite slope of the solid/liquid phase line, and the liquid phase will condense under pressure to a solid phase.

3 LN–10

Phase Diagram of Water

Supercritical fluid 217.7 Critical point ) m t a (

e

r Normal u s s Solid Liquid e r

P 1 Normal boiling point

-3 6.0 x 10 Gas Triple point (Tt)

0 0.0098 100 374.4 Temperature (oC)

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Fig. 1 Pressure/Temperature Diagram for Water. (Not drawn to scale.)

3. AND EQUILIBRIUM

The phase rule, also known as the Gibbs phase rule, relates the number of components and the number of degrees of freedom in a system at equilibrium by the formula F = C – P + 2 [1] where F equals the number of degrees of freedom or the number of independent variables, C equals the number of components in a system in equilibrium and P equals the number of phases. The digit 2 stands for the two variables, temperature and pressure.

4 LN–10

The number of degrees of freedom of a system is the number of variables that may be changed independently without causing the appearance of a new phase or disappearance of an existing phase. The number of chemical constituents that must be specified in order to describe the composition of each phase present. For example, in the reaction involving the decomposition of calcium carbonate on heating, there are three phases – two solid phases and one gaseous phase.

CaCO3 (s) � CaO (s) + CO2 (g) [2]

There are also three different chemical constituents, but the number of components is only two because any two constituents completely define the system in equilibrium. Any third constituent may be determined if the concentration of the other two is known. Substituting into the phase rule (eq. [1]) we can see that the system is univariant, since F = C – P + 2 = 2 – 3 + 2 = 1. Therefore only one variable, either temperature or pressure, can be changed independently. (The number of components is not always easy to determine at first glance, and it may require careful examination of the physical conditions of the system at equilibrium.)

The phase rule applies to dynamic and reversible processes where a system is heterogeneous and in equilibrium and where the only external variables are temperature, pressure and concentration. For one-component systems the maximum number of variables to be considered is two – pressure and temperature. Such systems can easily be represented graphically by ordinary rectangular coordinates. For two-component (or binary) systems the maximum number of variables is three – pressure, temperature and concentration. Only one concentration is required to define the composition since the second component is found by subtracting from unity. A graphical representation of such a system requires a three-dimensional diagram. This, however, is not well suited to illustration and consequently separate two-coordinate diagrams, such as pressure vs temperature, pressure vs composition and temperature

5 LN–10

vs composition, are mostly used. Solid/liquid systems are usually investigated at constant pressure, and thus only two variables need to be considered – the vapor pressure for such systems can be neglected. This is called a condensed system and finds considerable application in studying phase equilibria in various engineering materials. A condensed system will be represented by the following modified phase rule equation: F = C – P + 1 [3] where all symbols are the same as before, but (because of a constant pressure) the digit 2 is replaced by the digit 1, which stands for temperature as variable. The graphical representation of a solid/liquid binary system can be simplified by representing it on ordinary rectangular coordinates: temperature vs concentration or composition.

4. H vs T PHASE DIAGRAM

With the aid of a suitable calorimeter and energy reservoir, it is possible to measure the heat required to melt and evaporate a pure substance like ice. The experimental data obtainable for a mole of ice is shown schematically in fig. 2. As heat is added to the

solid, the temperature rises along line “a” until the temperature of fusion (Tf) is reached. The amount of heat absorbed per mole during melting is represented by the length of

line “b”, or ΔHF. The amount of heat absorbed per mole during evaporation at the boiling point is represented by line “d”. The reciprocal of the slope of line “a”, (dH/dT), is the heat required to change the temperature of one mole of substance (at constant

pressure) by 1°CF. (dH/dT) is the molar heat capacity of a material, referred to as “Cp”.

As the reciprocal of line “a” is Cp (solid), the reciprocals of lines “c” and “e” are

Cp (liquid) and Cp (vapor) respectively.

6 LN–10

Fig. 2 H vs T Diagram for Pure H2O. (Not to scale.)

From a thermodynamic standpoint, it is important to realize that fig. 2 illustrates the energy changes that occur in the system during heating. Actual quantitative measurements show that 5.98 kJ of heat are absorbed at the melting point (latent heat of fusion) and 40.5 kJ per mole (latent heat of evaporation) at the boiling point. The latent of fusion and evaporation are unique characteristics of all pure substances.

Substances like Fe, Co, Ti and others, which are allotropic (exhibit different structures at different temperatures), also exhibit latent heats of transformation as they change from one solid state crystal modification to another.

5. ENERGY CHANGES

When heat is added from the surroundings to a material system (as described above), the energy of the system changes. Likewise, if work is done on the surroundings by the material system, its energy changes. The difference in energy (ΔE) that the system

7 LN–10

experiences must be the difference between the heat absorbed (Q) by the system and the work (W) done on the surroundings. The energy change may therefore be written as: ΔE = Q – W [4]

If heat is liberated by the system, the sign of Q is negative and work done is positive. Q and W depend on the direction of change, but ΔE does not. The above relation is one way of representing the First Law of which states that the energy of a system and its surroundings is always conserved while a change in energy of the system takes place. The energy change, ΔE, for a process is independent of the path taken in going from the initial to the final state.

In the laboratory most reactions and phase changes are studied at constant pressure. The work is then done solely by the pressure (P), acting through the change, ΔV. W = PΔV and ΔP = 0 [5] Hence: Q = ΔE + PΔV [6] Since the heat content of a system, or the enthalpy H, is defined by: H = E + PV [7] ΔH = ΔE + PΔV [8] so that: ΔH = Q – W + PΔV [9] or ΔH = Q [10]

Reactions in which ΔH is negative are called exothermic since they liberate heat, whereas endothermic reactions absorb heat. Fusion is an endothermic process, but the reverse reaction, , is an exothermic one.

8 LN–10

6. ENTROPY AND FREE ENERGY

When a gas condenses to form a liquid and a liquid freezes to form a crystalline solid, the degree of internal order increases. Likewise, atomic vibrations decrease to zero when a perfect crystal is cooled to 0°K. Since the term entropy, designated by S, is considered a measure of the degree of disorder of a system, a perfect crystal at 0°K has zero entropy.

The product of the absolute temperature, T, and the change in entropy, ΔS, is called the entropy factor, TΔS. This product has the same units (Joules/mole) as the change in enthalpy, ΔH, of a system. At constant pressure, P, the two energy changes are related to one another by the Gibbs free energy relation: ΔF = ΔH – TΔS[ 11] where F = H – TS [12]

The natural tendency exhibited by all materials systems is to change from one of higher to one of lower free energy. Materials systems also tend to assume a state of greater disorder whereby the entropy factor TΔS is increased. The free energy change, ΔF, expresses the balance between the two opposing tendencies, the change in heat content (ΔH) and the change in the entropy factor (TΔS).

If a system at constant pressure is in an equilibrium state, such as ice and water at 0°C, for example, at atmospheric pressure it cannot reach a lower energy state. At equilibrium in the ice-water system, the opposing tendencies, ΔH and TΔS, equal one another so that ΔF = 0. At the fusion temperature, TF: �H � � F SF [13] TF Similarly, at the boiling point:

9 LN–10

�H � � V SV [14] TV Thus melting or evaporation only proceed if energy is supplied to the system from the surroundings.

The entropy of a pure substance at constant pressure increases with temperature according to the expression:

C �T �S � p (since : �H � C �T) [15] T p where Cp is the heat capacity at constant pressure, ΔCp, ΔH, T and ΔT are all measurable quantities from which ΔS and ΔF can be calculated.

7. F vs T

Any system can change spontaneously if the accompanying free energy change is negative. This may be shown graphically by making use of F vs T curves such as those shown in fig. 3.

Fig. 3 Free energy is a function of temperature for ice and water.

10 LN–10

The general decrease in free energy of all the phases with increasing temperature is the result of the increasing dominance of the temperature-entropy term. The increasingly negative slope for phases which are stable at increasingly higher temperatures is the result of the greater entropy of these phases.

PART B: PHASE DIAGRAMS (TWO-COMPONENT SYSTEMS)

1. SOLID SOLUTIONS

A solution can be defined as a homogeneous mixture in which the atoms or molecules of one substance are dispersed at random into another substance. If this definition is applied to solids, we have a solid solution. The term “solid solution” is used just as “liquid solution” is used because the solute and solvent atoms (applying the term solvent to the element in excess) are arranged at random. The properties and composition of a solid solution are, however, uniform as long as it is not examined at the atomic or molecular level.

Solid solutions in alloy systems may be of two kinds: substitutional and interstitial. A substitutional solid solution results when the solute atoms take up the positions of the solvent metal in the crystal lattice. Solid solubility is governed by the comparative size of the atoms of the two elements, their structure and the difference in electronegativity.

If the atomic radii of a solvent and solute differ by more than 15% of the radius of the solvent, the range of solubility is very small. When the atomic radii of two elements are equal or differ by less than 15% in size and when they have the same number of valency electrons, substitution of one kind of atom for another may occur with no distortion or negligible distortion of the crystal lattice, resulting in a series of homogeneous solid solutions. For an unlimited solubility in the solid state, the radii of the two elements must not differ by more than 8% and both the solute and the solvent elements must have the same crystal structure.

11 LN–10

In addition to the atomic size factor, the solid solution is also greatly affected by the electronegativity of elements and by the relative valency factor. The greater the difference between electronegativities, the greater is the tendency to form compounds and the smaller is the solid solubility. Regarding valency effect, a metal of lower valency is more likely to dissolve a metal of higher valency. Solubility usually increases with increasing temperature and decreases with decreasing temperature. This causes precipitation within a homogeneous solid solution phase, resulting in hardening effect of an alloy. When ionic solids are considered, the valency of ions is a very important factor.

2. CONSTRUCTION OF EQUILIBRIUM PHASE DIAGRAMS OF TWO-COMPONENT SYSTEMS

To construct an equilibrium phase diagram of a binary system, it is a necessary and sufficient condition that the boundaries of one-phase regions be known. In other words, the equilibrium diagram is a plot of solubility relations between components of the system. It shows the number and composition of phases present in any system under equilibrium conditions at any given temperature. Construction of the diagram is often based on solubility limits determined by thermal analysis – i.e., using cooling curves. Changes in volume, electrical conductivity, crystal structure and dimensions can also be used in constructing phase diagrams.

The solubility of two-component (or binary) systems can range from essential insolubility to complete solubility in both liquid and solid states, as mentioned above. Water and oil, for example, are substantially insoluble in each other while water and

12 LN–10

alcohol are completely intersoluble. Let us visualize an experiment on the water-ether system in which a series of of water and ether in various proportions is placed in test tubes. After shaking the test tubes vigorously and allowing the mixtures to settle, we find present in them only one phase of a few percent of ether in water or water in ether, whereas for fairly large percentages of either one in the other there are two phases. These two phases separate into layers, the upper layer being ether saturated with water and the lower layers being water saturated with ether. After sufficiently increasing the temperature, we find, regardless of the proportions of ether and water, that the two phases become one. If we plot solubility limit with temperature as ordinate and composition as abscissa, we have an isobaric [constant pressure (atmospheric in this case)] phase diagram, as shown in fig. 4. This system exhibits a solubility gap.

One phase Temperature Two phases

0 20 40 60 80 100 Composition percent, water 100 80 60 40 20 0 Composition percent, ether

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Fig. 4 Schematic representation of the solubilities of ether and water in each other.

13 LN–10

3. COOLING CURVES

Fig. 5 Cooling curves: (a) pure compound; (b) binary solid solution; (c) binary .

Source: Jastrzebski, Z. The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials. 2nd edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1976. Courtesy of John Wiley & Sons. Used with permission.

4. SOLID SOLUTION EQUILIBRIUM DIAGRAMS

Read in Jastrzebski: First two paragraphs and Figure 3-4 in Chapter 3-8, "Solid Solutions Equilibrium Diagrams," pp. 91-92.

Read in Smith, C. O. The Science of Engineering Materials. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986. ISBN: 9780137948840. Last two paragraphs and Figure 7-8 in Chapter 7-3-1, "Construction of a Simple Equilibrium Diagram," pp. 247-248.

14 LN–10

Fig. 6 Plotting equilibrium diagrams from cooling curves for Cu-Ni solid solution alloys. (a) Cooling curves; (b) equilibrium diagram. Source: Jastrzebski, Z. The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials. 2nd edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1976. Courtesy of John Wiley & Sons. Used with permission.

Fig. 7 15 LN–10

5. INTERPRETATION OF PHASE DIAGRAMS

From the above discussion we can draw two useful conclusions which are the only rules necessary for interpreting equilibrium diagrams of binary systems.

Rule 1 - Phase composition: To determine the composition of phases which are stable at a given temperature we draw a horizontal line at the given temperature. The projections (upon the abscissa) of the intersections of the isothermal line with the liquidus and the solidus give the compositions of the liquid and solid, respectively, which coexist in equilibrium at that temperature. For example, draw a horizontal temperature

line through temperature Te in fig. 7. The Te line intersects the solidus at f and the liquidus at g, indicating solid composition of f% of B and (100–f)% of A. The liquid composition at this temperature is g% of B and (100–g)% of A. This line in a two-phase region is known as a tie line because it connects or “ties” together lines of one-fold saturation – i.e., the solid is saturated with respect to B and the liquid is saturated with respect to A.

Rule 2 - The Lever Rule: To determine the relative amounts of the two phases, erect an ordinate at a point on the composition scale which gives the total or overall composition of the alloy. The intersection of this composition vertical and a given isothermal line is the fulcrum of a simple lever system. The relative lengths of the lever arms multiplied by the amounts of the phase present must balance. As an illustration, consider alloy � in fig. 7. The composition vertical is erected at alloy � with a composition of e% of B and (100–e)% of A. This composition vertical intersects the

temperature horizontal (Te) at point e. The length of the line “f–e–g” indicates the total amount of the two phases present. The length of line “e–g” indicates the amount of

16 LN–10

solid. In other words: eg x 100 � % of solid present fg fg x 100 � % of liquid present fg

These two rules give both the composition and the relative quantity of each phase present in a two-phase region in any binary system in equilibrium regardless of physical form of the two phases. The two rules apply only to two-phase regions.

6. ISOMORPHOUS SYSTEMS

An isomorphous system is one in which there is complete intersolubility between the two components in the vapor, liquid and solid phases, as shown in fig. 9. The Cu-Ni system is both a classical and a practical example since the monels, which enjoy extensive commercial use, are Cu-Ni alloys. Many practical materials systems are isomorphous.

Fig. 9 Schematic phase diagram for a binary system, A-B, showing complete intersolubility (isomorphism) in all phases.

17 LN–10

7. INCOMPLETE SOLUBILITY

Read in Smith, C. O. The Science of Engineering Materials. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986. ISBN: 9780137948840. Chapter 7-3-5, "Incomplete Solubility," pp. 252-253.

8. EUTECTIC SYSTEMS

Read in Smith: Chapter 7-3-6, "Eutectic," pp. 253-256.

9. EQUILIBRIUM DIAGRAMS WITH INTERMEDIATE COMPOUNDS

Read in Jastrzebski, Z. D. The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1976. ISBN: 9780471440895.

Chapter 3-11,"Equilibrium Diagrams with Intermediate Compounds," pp. 102-103.

18 LN–10

Fig. 15 Binary system showing an intermediate compound. C is the melting point (maximum) of the compound AB having the composition C’. E is the eutectic of solid A and solid AB. E’ is the eutectic of solid AB and solid B.

Source: Jastrzebski, Z. The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials. 2nd edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1976. Courtesy of John Wiley & Sons. Used with permission.

19 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu

3.091SC Introduction to Solid State Chemistry Fall 2009

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. TERNARY PHASE DIAGRAMS Credit forscanning thephasediagrams: Credit forPhase DiagramDrawings: San JoseStateUniversity Guna Selvaduray An Introduction Richard Brindos Richard rne Croom Brenden

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Utility ofTernary PhaseDiagrams ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Solder metallurgy Stainless steels Aluminum alloys Refractories Glass compositions Several other applications

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 .Rimn PhaseEquilibria A. Reisman, .N hns PhaseDiagrams inMetallurgy F. N.Rhines, G. Masing,TernarySystems A. Prince,AlloyPhaseEquilibria C. G. Bergeron andS.H.Ri C. G.Bergeron .F eadandD.R.Wilder,Fundamentals ofPhaseEquilibria M. F.Berard D. R.F.West,TernaryEquilibrium Diagrams York, 1956 New York,1982 in CeramicSystems inCeramics Equilibria New York,1944 1984 New York,1966 References on Ternary Phase , R.A.N.Publishers, Ohio,1990 Diagrams , TheAmerican CeramicSociety,Ohio, sbud, IntroductiontoPhase , ReinholdPublishingCompany, , Academic Press,1970 , ElsevierPublishingCompany, , McGraw-Hill, New , Chapman and Hall, , ChapmanandHall,

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 What areTernary PhaseDiagrams? Normally, pressure isnotaviable variablein Diagrams thatrepresent theequilibrium therefore held constantat1atm. ternary phase diagramconstruction, andis temperature. between threecomponents, asafunctionof between thevarious phases thatareformed

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Components are “independent components” P =4when C=3andF0 For C=3, the maximumnumber ofphaseswill P F =C+1- For isobaricsystems: P F =C+2- co-exist when F=0 The GibbsPhaseRulefor 3-Component Systems

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Solidification sequence Amount ofeachphase Chemical composition ofindividualphases Number ofphases Overall composition Some Important Terms

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 The Gibbs Triangle:Anequilateral triangleon The Gibbs Triangleisalwaysused todetermine Sum oftheconcentration ofthethree or Can beexpressedas either“wt.%” The concentrationof eachofthethree by each corner which thepure components arerepresented the overall composition components mustaddupto100% components “molar %” vrl opsto 1 Overall Composition -

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 The concentrations ofAand C,inX, canbe intersectsthe side ABtells Where the line A’C’ Draw lines passingthroughX, and parallelto Let theoverallcomposition berepresentedby Refer toFiguresOC1 andOC2 Method 1 There arethreeways ofdeterminingtheoverall determined inan identical manner us theconcentration ofcomponent BinX each ofthe sides the pointX composition vrl opsto 2 Overall Composition -

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 This method can besomewhat confusing, and Concentration ofA=B’B Concentration ofC=A’B’ Concentration ofB=AA’ intersectsABatB’ B’C” intersectsABatA’ A’C’ Draw linesthroughX, paralleltothesidesof Method Two is not recommended Gibbs Triangle vrl opsto 3 Overall Composition - :

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 %A =AX Draw straightlinesfrom eachcorner,throughX Application oftheInverse LeverRule Method 3 Always determine theconcentration ofthe Important Note: adding themup toobtain100% components independently, thencheck by MB CL BN AM vrl opsto 4 Overall Composition - %B =BX %C =CX

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 h iudsSurface The Liquidus System Isomorphous h oiu Surface The Solidus solid solubility made upofthreebinaries thatexhibittotal components. Theternary systemistherefore components aretotally solubleintheother case) thathasonlyone solidphase.All composition solid phase forms forany givenoverall temperatures below which a(homogeneous) liquid forms foranygivenoverall composition temperatures abovewhichahomogeneous enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous : Aplotof the : Aplotof the : Asystem(ternaryin this

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System iudsSurface Liquidus

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System oiu Surface Solidus

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System Identify temperature of interest,T Refer toFiguresBT1A, BT1BandBT1C Isothermal Section Connect points 3&4with curvature reflecting Connect points 1&2withcurvature reflecting Draw thehorizontal, intersecting theliquidus temperature through thespacediagram ataspecified ternary phasediagram obtainedbycutting h oiu surface the solidus surface the liquidus surfacesatpoints 1,2,3&4 and solidus enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous A“oiotl sectionofa : A“horizontal” 1 here

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System ra1234 topaergo liquid +solid Area 1-2-3-4: twophaseregion - Area C-3-4: homogeneoussolid phase Area A-B-1-2: homogeneousliquid phase The lineconnectingpoints 3&4representsthe The lineconnectingpoints 1&2representsthe surface intersection oftheisotherm withthesolidus surface intersection oftheisotherm withtheliquidus enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System Temperature =T Isothermal Section Area 1-2-3-4: two phase region - liquid +solid liquid Area 1-2-3-4: twophaseregion - Area B-C-4-3:homogeneous solidphase Area A-1-2:homogeneous liquidphase B, butabovemelting pointofC enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous 2 , belowmeltingpoints ofA& continued -

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System when theoverall compositionis inatwophase ofeachphasepresent Amount (b) compositionofphases present Chemical (a) Determination of: region enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System 4. Thechemical compositionof thesolidphase 3. Thechemicalcomposition oftheliquidphase 2. Drawtie-linepassing throughX,tointersect 1. Locateoverallcomposition usingtheGibbs the Gibbs Triangle is givenby thelocationofpoint Zwithin the Gibbs Triangle is givenby thelocationofpoint Ywithin the phaseboundaries atYandZ triangle enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System 6. Fraction ofliquid=ZX/YZ 5. Fraction ofsolid=YX/YZ Amount ofeachphase presentisdeterminedby Tie line using theInverseLever Rule compositions enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous : Astraightlinejoining anytwoternary

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Isomorphous System 3. Exceptfor thetwobounding tie-lines,they 2. Theymust runbetweentwo one-phase 1. Thedirectionsoftie linesvarygraduallyfrom Drawing tie-linesintwo phaseregions corners ofthecompositional triangle are notnecessarily pointedtoward the regions other, withoutcrossing eachother that ofoneboundary tielinetothatofthe enr smrhu System Ternary Isomorphous

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility L = The TernaryEutectic Reaction: Made upof threebinaryeutectic systems,allof A liquidphase solidifiesintothree separate which exhibitno solidsolubility solid phases α Ternary Eutectic System + βγ (No SolidSolubility)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Three solid phases Liquid +two solidphases Liquid +onesolidphase Homogeneous liquid phase Phase regions Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) :

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility l onsi pc,blwtelqiu surface, All pointsin space,belowtheliquidus surface, All pointsinspace,above theliquidus somewherein surface “dipsdown” The liquidus Surface The Liquidus phases ( represent the existenceoftwo or more liquid phase represent the existenceofahomogeneous all threebinaryeutectic temperatures which wouldbeata temperature lowerthan the middle,toternary eutecticpoint, Ternary Eutectic System more onthislater (No SolidSolubility) )

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility h iudssurface alsorepresentsthe The liquidus a projection ofthe Projection- The Liquidus Surface The Liquidus regions region and the(liquid+onesolid phase) boundary between thesinglephase liquid of isothermsandphase regions surfaceontoaplane, withindications liquidus Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) (continued)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility The surfaces P-E-G-I-PandP-J-H-I-J-P The surfaceP-E-F-Jrepresents theboundary With referencetoFigure EB1: Boundaries between 2phaseregions&3 solid phases) regions one solidphase) regionandthe (liquid+two represent the boundarybetween the(liquid+ one solidphase) region between theliquidregion andthe(liquid+ regions Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility The boundary betweenthesetwo regionsisa anda We havetworegions: aregionof“liquid” Isothermal Sectionat T ihtelqiu surface with theliquidus line, thecurvature ofwhichisin accordance region of“liquid+A” A, butabovemelting pointsofBandC Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 1 , belowmeltingpoint of

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility The boundary betweenLandL+A isdetermined L, This isothermal sectionhasthree regions- Isothermal Sectionat T iudssurface liquidus by where theisothermal plane cuts the L+A, andL +C the systemA-C of B,andabovetheeutectic temperatureof points ofAandC,but abovethemeltingpoint Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 2 , belowthemelting

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Note thatpoints 2and4haveconverged and The isothermalsection nowhasfourregions: Isothermal sectionat temperatureT eutectic pointto theternary eutectic point represents thepath thatconnects the A-C moved into theGibbsTriangle; this L, L+A,L+ C,L+AC abovethemelting pointofB eutectic temperature ofthesystemA-C,but Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 3 , belowthe

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility h he-hs eini rage-calleda The three-phase regionisatriangle - The boundariesbetween theone-phaseand tie-triangle at apoint phase regionandthe three-phaseregionmeet three-phase regions are lines,but two-phase regions,and thetwo-phaseand Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) the one-

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility D R: dimensionofthe concerned diagramor R R D (for isothermalsections ofternaryphasediagrams) 1 1 + - section of a ternary,R=2 section of a diagram;foranisothermal contact contact, 1forlinecontact and2forsurface neighboring phaseregions; 0forpoint to another crossing theboundary from onephase region to another crossing the boundaryfromone phaseregion : numberof phasesthatdisappear : dimensionofboundary between : number ofphases thatappear D = R- Law ofAdjoining Phases - -D + >= 0 when when

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility 1-phase region with1-phaseregion: point 2-phase regionwith region:point 2-phase regionwith3-phase region:tie-line 1-phase regionwith3-phase region:point 1-phase regionwith2-phase region:line Law ofAdjoiningPhases (continued)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Point 2has movedfurtherinto the Gibbs The isothermal sectionnowhas fiveregions: Isothermal sectionat temperatureT Triangle, towards theternary eutectic point L, L+A,L+B, L+C,L+A+C above theA-BandB-C eutectictemperatures eutectic temperature oftheA-Csystem,but melting pointsofA,B andC,belowthe Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 4 , belowthe

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility In addition toPoint2,1has alsomoved The isothermal sectionnowhas sixregions: Isothermal sectionat temperatureT eutectic into the GibbsTriangle, towards the ternary L, L+A,L+B, L+C,L+A+B,L+A+C points below allothermelting pointsandeutectic eutectic temperature oftheB-Csystem,but Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 5 , abovethe

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Note that theliquid regions isslowly In addition toPoints1&2,Point 3hasalso The isothermalsection nowhassevenregions: Isothermal sectionat temperatureT converging towards theternary eutectic point ternary eutectic moved into theGibbsTriangle, towardsthe L, L+A,L+B,L+C,L+A+B, L+A+C,L+B+C other meltingpoints and eutecticpoints ternary eutectictemperature, butbelowall Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 6 , abovethe

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility e hsln nesc h iudssurface ata Let this lineintersect theliquidus Imagine a line, orthogonaltothe planeofthe Let theoverall compositionbe given bythe Given anoverallcomposition, determinethe Solidification Sequence temperature T projection, passingthroughX liquidus point X equilibrium conditions sequence ofsolidification, assuming Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 1

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility For alltemperatures T > Solidification Sequence The firstsolid toappearis:A begins whenT= Solidification homogeneous liquid phase Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) (continued) 1 , thereisone 1

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility When T< Solidification Sequence At temperatures ofT Let thetemperature atYbeT As thetemperaturedrops, thecompositionof phases in equilibrium - A andL A phases in equilibrium - surface, towards Y. on theliquidus along thelineXY, the liquidphase“travels” Ternary Eutectic System 1 , thenprecipitationof Aoccurs (No SolidSolubility) 2 < T (continued) 1 2 , thereare two

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Chemical composition oftheliquid phaseis Fraction of A=XZ/AZ Fraction of L=AX/AZ We usetheInverseLever Rule Let T=T’,beingatpoint Z In ordertodetermine theamountofeachphase Solidification Sequence within theGibbs Triangle determined bythecomposition ofpointZ present, weneedtofix thetemperaturefirst. Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) (continued)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility At pointY,whereT= T Solidification Sequence Over thetemperature rangeof T - Both solid phases, A and B, coprecipitate as as solid phases, AandB, coprecipitate Both - The solidphasesAand Bexistinequilibrium - the temperature islowered with L phase, B,beginstoprecipitate Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 2 , thesecondsolid (continued) 2 > T E :

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility e eprtr ”correspond to thepointM Let temperature T” How dowe determinetheamounts ofA,Band Composition ofLisgiven bythecompositionof Analysis whenT=T”, i.e.,atpointM Solidification Sequence L? M withintheGibbsTriangle Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) (continued)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Fraction of L= Fraction of B= Fraction of A= This triangleisaternary systeminwhichthe Construct thetriangle A-B-M Solidification Sequence terms ofthe threeconstituents overall composition X canberepresentedin Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) RX/RM QX/QB PX/PA (continued)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility For alloverall compositionsthat fallwithinthe Isothermal Sectionat T= Phase analysisatagiven temperature composition the liquidphase isthesameas theoverall region marked L,thechemical composition of reference Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) 4 will beusedas

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility 3. Usethe Inverse LeverRuleto determinethe 2. Drawtie lines,inthiscaseconnecting pointC 1. Locatetheposition oftheoverall If theoverallcomposition fallswithinatwo Phase analysisatagiven temperature amounts of LandC intersecting line2-3atY to line2-3, andpassingthrough X,and composition, X,within theGibbsTriangle phase region,e.g.,L + C,then: Fraction ofC= Fraction ofL= Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility) CX/CY YX/CY

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility The chemical compositionofL isgivenby The chemicalcomposition ofCinthiscaseis Phase analysisatagiven temperature represents withintheGibbsTriangle determining thecomposition pointY 100% C Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility Fraction ofL =YR/MR Fraction ofC= PY/PC Fraction ofA= QY/QA 3. Usethe Inverse LeverRuleto determinethe 2. Construct thefollowingstraight lines: 1. Locatetheposition oftheoverall If theoverallcomposition fallswithinathree Phase analysisatagiven temperature amounts of L,AandC composition, Y,within theGibbsTriangle phase region,e.g.,L + AC A-Y-Q, M-Y-R andC-Y-P Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility The chemical compositionofL isgivenby The chemical compositionofC inthiscaseis The chemicalcomposition ofAinthiscaseis Phase analysisatagiven temperature represents withintheGibbsTriangle determining thecomposition pointY 100% C 100% A Ternary Eutectic System (No SolidSolubility)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – No Solid Solubility The BoundaryCurvature Rule The BoundaryRule The Solubility Rule phases. phases, wherepdenotes thenumberof 1 bounded onlybyregions containingp+/- soluble to some degreeinallphases adjacent two-phase regions. such thatthe boundariesextrapolate intothe one-phase regionsmustmeetwith curvatures Some UsefulRulesregarding Phase Diagrams : Allcomponents are : Anyp-phaseregion canbe : Boundariesof

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System (With SolidSolubility)

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Source: Bergeron &Risbud Bergeron Source: h laaeLine. the Alkamade boundary line andatemperature minimumon represents atemperaturemaximum onthat line line withitsCorresponding Alkamade Theorem Alkamade a commonboundary line. primary crystalsoftwo areashaving A joinconnectingthe compositionofthe laaelines nevercross oneanother Alkamade lmd Lines Alamade : Theintersectionof a boundary

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 B lmd Lines Alamade BC A C laaeLines: Alkamade A-BC B-BC BC-C A-B B-CC-A

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Ternary Eutectic System – With Solid Solubility

G. Selvaduray - SJSU - Oct 2004 Colligative Properties- Page 1 Lecture 4: Colligative Properties

• By definition a colligative property is a solution property (a property of mixtures) for which it is the amount of solute dissolved in the solvent matters but the kind of solute does not matter.

• Coming to grips with this concept should immediately remind you of kinetic molecular theory of gases—in that case we treated gas molecules as indistinguishable hard spheres and (ideally) it was the number of them, rather than the type of molecules, that determined gas properties.

• This means that when considering the impact of solute on a colligative property, 1 mole of sugar ≡ 1 mole Na + ≡ 1 mole O 2− ≡ 1 mole urea ≡ 1 mole pickles do exactly the same thing

Listed below are the four colligative properties we will examine during this lecture—each is kind of fun because it is associated with fairly famous physical phenomena that you might like to explain to a friend .

♦Vapor Pressure Lowering—explains the value of putting antifreeze in your radiator to keep a car from overheating

Colligative Properties ♦Boiling Point Raising—explains how you can cook spaghetti faster in salt water

♦Freezing Point Lowering explains why salt is placed on roads to keep ice from forming

♦Osmotic Pressure explains why your little brother killed the family fish when he placed them in pure water while cleaning the tank.

For each of these properties you will be introduced to the physical phenomenon behind the property and learn how to perform simple calculations to determine the magnitude the change in solution state function associated with a colligative property.

Colligative Properties- Page 2

Concentration and Colligative Properties

If colligative properties depend on the amount of the solute in the solvent, then the equations defining them must include a concentration term, and sure enough, they do. Over the next few pages you will be introduced to the equations in the context of the specific properties, but for now, simply note the similarities in structure for the equations: each equation includes a colligative property on the left side of the equation that is set equal to a concentration term and a solvent constant.

ΔP vapor pressure ΔT temperature raising or lowering π osmotic pressure

ΔT f = -mK f 0 ΔP = χP ΔT f = -mK f π = MRT

Three properties set equal to three different concentrations terms times a solvent constant

Let’s practice performing concentration calculations. Two of these, molarity, M, and mole fraction, X, should be familiar to you. A third, molality, m, may be new. But all are useful ways to define the amount of stuff in solution—the more stuff, the larger the concentration.

Let’s start by imagining that we are placing 50 g (0.146 mole) of the solute, sugar, in 117 g (6.5 mole) of the solvent, H 2 O.

♦What is χ (mole fraction) of 50g of sugar in 117 g of water?

molesA 0.146sugar χ = = = 0.022 mole fraction sugar molesA + molesB 0.146sugar + 6.5H 2O

♦What is m (molality) of 50g of sugar in 117 g of water? Note that the moloaity calculation is similar to a molarity calculation except that we divide by the mass of the solvent in kg rather than the liters of solution.

molesA 0.146mole, sugar m = = = 1.25 molal kg, solvent 0.117kg, H 2O Colligative Properties- Page 3

♦What is M (molarity) of 50g of sugar in 117 g of water? First we need to find the volume of solution from a density calculation. 1mL V = (mass)(density) = (50 g + 117 g)( ) = 125 mL solution 1.34g 0.146moles M = molesA = = 1.17 Molar Vsolution 0.125L

So we have 3 ways to describe 50g of sugar in 117 g of water, each of which is used in a colligative property calculation.

0.022 mole fraction ≡ 1.25 m ≡ 1.17 M

Colligative Properties- Page 4 Time out for the Van’t Hoff equation. Every test on colligative properties includes a question that employs the Van’t Hoff equation. Text books make this seem a lot harder than it is. Very simply, Van’t Hoff corrects for the fact that the number of particles you thrown into solution is not always the number of particles that determine the magnitude of the property. For example, think about what happens when you put the following one mole quantities into a liter of water. Which one raises the boiling point the most?

1. 1 mole NaCl 2. 1 mole Na 2 S 3. 1 mole CaS 4. 1 mole sugar

You might think 1 mole is 1 mole is 1 mole, and they are all the same. But 1 mole NaCl 1 mole Na 2 S 1 mole CaS 1 mole sugar

1 mole Na + 1 mole and 1 mole 2 moles 0 moles sugar + Cl − Na CaS 1 mole insoluble S 2−

In fact each produces a different number of dissolved particles in solution.

• 1mole of NaCl is 2 moles of particles in the solvent • 1 mole of Na2S is 3 moles of particles in the solvent • 1 mole of insoluble CaS is 0 moles of particles in the solvent • 1 mole of sugar is 1 mole of particles in solution

What we need is a correction factor for each compound, i, the Van’t Hoff factor, which is i = 2, 3, 0 and 1, respectively for the four solutions. i is simply inserted into every colligative property equation to make the correction.

Oh, and the answer to the original question about the change in boiling point for the four one mole samples?

1 mole Na 2 S > 1 mole NaCl > 1 mole sugar > 1 mole CaS Colligative Properties- Page 5 So how big of an effect does a solute concentration have on a colligative property?

Now time for some math with the four different equations for colligative properties. Suppose we wanted to measure just how much 50 grams of sugar in 117 grams of water changed the magnitude of a state function.

Colligative property 1: Vapor pressure depression 0 ΔP = P χ mole fraction which is the amount of solute added

depression constant which is the vapor pressure of pure solvent at a given T. of pure solvent in vapor pressure

o For H 2 O at 25 C the pure vapor pressure is 23.8 torr

So the vapor pressure depression in ΔP = 23.8 torr (0.022) = 0.524 torr

And the new vapor pressure is now about 23.3 torr.

By the way, this equation is referred to as Raoult’s Law which says simply that the vapor pressure above a solution is proportional to the mole fraction of the solute. Colligative Properties- Page 6 Time out for a famous vapor pressure calculation.

Calculating the total vapor pressure of a binary mixture of two volatile solvents.

Note that in the problem above, we determined the reduction in vapor pressure of the solvent. It decreased from 23.8 torr to 23.3 torr. But what if two volatile compounds were mixed together. Each would contribute to the other having a vapor pressure lowering, but the overall vapor pressure would have to be determined by adding together the individual vapor pressures of the two compounds.

Sample problem. Suppose you combine two compounds, A and B, in a mole ratio of 0.25 to 0.75. At a given temperature, the pure vapor pressure of compound A is 100 torr and the pure vapor pressure of compounds B is 50 torr. What are the new vapor pressures for A and B combined.

Calculation.

First, determine the vapor pressure for each compound:

0 For compound A-- Pa = Pa χ = 100 torr x 0.25 = 25 torr contribution for A.

0 For compound B—Pb = Pb χ = 50 torr x 0.75 = 37.5 torr contribution for B.

Total vapor pressure above the solution (assuming gas ideality and using Dalton’s Law of partial Pressures)

Ptot = Pa + Pb = 25 + 37.5 torr = 62.5 torr.

Note this problem can be made more complicated by making you work to calculate a mole fraction (I started by having a mole fraction.) Colligative Properties- Page 7 Colligative Property 2: boiling point elevation

ΔT b = K b m molality which is the amount of solute added

temperature constant which is the boiling point elevation constant for water increase because of solute

o For water, K b is 0.512 C/molal

o So the boiling point elevation is ΔT b = K b m = (0.512)(1.25 m) = 0.64 And the new b.p. of water with a heck of a lot of sugar in it is 100.64 o C

Colligative Property 3: freezing point depression

ΔTf = Kfm molality which is the amount of solute added

temperature constant which is the boiling point elevation constant for water decrease because of solute

o For water, K b 1.86 C/molal

o So the boiling point elevation is ΔT f = -K f m = -(1.86)(1.25) = 2.32 C And the new f.p. of water with a heck of a lot of sugar in it is -2.32 o C

Colligative Properties- Page 8

Colligative Property 4: osmotic pressure

π = MRT molarity which is the amount of solute added

Osmotic pressure constant, RT, which seems to pop up everywhere increase because of solute

The constants R and T are the ideal gas law constant and the system temperature

So the osmotic pressure change is π = MRT = (1.17 M)(0.082)(298 K) = 28.6 atm

Colligative Properties- Page 9 Comparison of magnitudes of colligative property changes.

Let’s look at how much the colligative property change was for the same solute/solvent combination—note that what determines the magnitude of the overall change is the amplification by the constant term—in other words, the bigger the constant, the bigger the change, and the clear winner is the RT term for osmotic pressure. Sample values for freezing and boiling points constants for different solvents also give you an idea of what kind of changes to expect for different solvents.

• ΔP lowers pressure from 23.8 to 23.3 torr o o • ΔT b raises boiling point of water from 100 C to 100.64 C o o • ΔT f lowers freezing point of water from 0 C to -2.32 C • π raises osmotic pressure from 1 atm to 28.6 atm

While the temperature was changing by a degree or so for boiling point elevation or freezing point depression, there was a near 30-fold increase in osmotic pressure—no wonder fish are so sensitive.

Not that even with small changes, significant impacts can occur in the real world, as we will see:

• Vapor pressure lowering explains why we add ethylene glycol to water. • Boiling point elevation explains how adding salt to water speeds up cooking pasta. • Freezing point depression explains how putting salt on icy roads melts ice. • Osmotic pressure change explains lysing of cells or why you can’t put salt water fish in fresh water.

Colligative Properties- Page 10 A bit of theory with bad pictures to explain colligative properties

Colligative property 1: V.P depression and B.P elevation. What happens when y ou add to pure ? Look at the drawing below to see a simple explanation.

Mixture 75 % to 25% compared to Pure solution of 100%

Surface molecules

ΔP = χP 0 ΔP = χP 0

25% pure solvent 0% pure solvent

Since we know that vapor pressure is a surface phenomenon, we see that one obvious reason for the reduction in vapor pressure is that there are fewer surface locations to put a molecule. So the solvent will have to have a reduction in vapor pressure because fewer molecules are present to leave the surface. The plot of mole fraction versus vapor pressure shows this obvious consequence.

A second reason for the reduction in vapor pressure is an entropic effect. Recall that highly ordered systems are not favored, and so for example, pure liquids will have a larger driving force from the change in entropy compared to mixtures which have a smaller entropy change.

Finally, note that the same argument that explains vapor pressure lowering also explains boiling point elevation. If the definition of boiling is that the vapor pressure exceeds atmospheric pressure, and the vapor pressure is lowered, then you need to raise temperature to achieve boiling. Colligative Properties- Page 11 Examples of vapor pressure lowering in action—your car radiator While you may not know a lot about the car daddy bought you, one thing that would make sense is that you want the liquid in your radiator to remain a liquid. Turning into a solid at really cold temperature, or turning into a vapor at high temperature, probably isn’t the best way to get the cooling action of recirculating fluid in a radiator going.

So what happens if you decide to use pure water as your radiator coolant:

f.p. b.p. o H 2 O 0 100

Or maybe you gould use a different solvent like pure ethylene glycol—that green stuff you buy in stores. f.p. b.p. ethylene -12 o 135 o glycol

Note that this isn’t the greatest temperature range for people who live in Canada and vacation in Florida. Your car radiator can freeze or overheat pretty easily with these pure liquids. But what happens if we take advantage of vapor pressure lowering by creating a mixture of two solvents.

f.p. b.p. o o 50-50 H 2 O, E.G. -34 265 o o o 30-70 H 2 O, E.G. -84 276 Wow a Δ of >350

A three order of magnitude increase in temperature range!! A couple of points:

• That 50-50 mixture they tell you to use isn’t as good as a 30-70 ratio—try impressing your Dad by telling him he can get an extra 50oC of liquid range (especially useful in cold climates) by using a little less water.

• The incredible temperature range achieved isn’t explained by anything we have mentioned but rather on interesting non-ideal effects that occur in mixtures, something you don’t learn about unless you take upper division physical chemistry. Colligative Properties- Page 12 Colligative Property 2—freezing point depression is explained

Freezing point depression is again thermodynamic effect. In order to make ice, which is a pure crystal, extra work must be done to separate the solute from the solvent—NaCl from water, for example. This means you need to reduce the freezing point to thermodynamically drive the reaction. This has the advantage of allowing for the deicing of streets by requiring that a temperature lower than 0oC be reached for ice to form. By the way, a lot of different kinds of compounds can be used to achieve this lower of the freezing point of ice. Salt is not the best candidate not only because it can cause only about a temperature drop of -15oC (making it useless when it gets colder) but also because it is so corrosive for automobiles. But it is cheap.

liquid creating ice in a mixture frozen

` liquid creating ice in pure solvent

Frozen

-

Colligative Properties- Page 13

Colligative property 3: Osmotic pressure.

Osmotic pressure in action with good pictures.

The movement of solvent across a semi-permeable membrane to establish equal concentration. Note that whenever you give solutes a chance, they will distribute evenly across a solvent—for example, a few drops of food coloring to water and over time, a homogeneity of color results from equal concentration of the dye in the solvent.

Now imagine that you create a barrier so that there is a selective ability to pass material throughout the solution. Semi- permeable membranes do this—they selectively allow one kind of molecule or another to cross the membrane. In the example shown, the membrane is cellulose acetate that selectively allows water to pass through to create the pressure differential.

Scientists are very creative at creating materials that allow one compound or another to selectively pass and so as you move along in science you will see many examples of selective mobility like this.

Of course the most famous example of a semipermeable membrane is the membrane in cells. There is an elaborate process by which water and various electrolytes cross the cell membrane barrier—(I have tried to forget all this because I couldn’t get into medical school and no longer care about electrolyte imbalance. But all of you in biology probably know this and could explain it to me if I cared.)

Colligative Properties- Page 14 So in the picture of red blood cells below, note that just like the porridge in Goldilocks and the Three Bears, the solution around the cells be just the right concentration making for nice healthy cells (first picture), too high a concentration in which case the water flows out of the cell and they shrivel up (second picture), or too low a concentration in which case water flows into the cells and they lyse or rupture (third picture.)

Osmotic pressure in action with bad pictures..

In Figure A, note the concentration imbalance inside the baggie formed by the semi-permeable membrane. The concentration gradient that results drives selectively into the baggie across the membrane (the cannot penetrate the baggie and leave. Consequently the large influx of to achieve a concentration balance results in an increase in pressure (osmotic pressure) inside the baggie.

Now imagine this happening in a cell, or heaven forbid, a fish. Your pet guppie, Toto, is happily swimming around in a dirty container of liquid in Figure C. Feeling badly for the fish and his dirty confines, you decide to place the fish in some clean water in Figure D. The water selectively enters the fish to ease the concentration gradient, and the increase in osmotic pressure, while a cleansing sort of thing in one respect, causes the fish to explode and die.

So now you know, it was you that killed your favorite pet. Colligative Properties- Page 15

Figure A— Figure C—dirty water

Figure D-clean water Figure E—R.I.P.

Figure B

Chem 467 Supplement to Lectures 33 Phase Equilibrium

Chemical Potential Revisited We introduced the as the conjugate variable to amount. Briefly reviewing, the total Gibbs energy of a system consisting of multiple chemical species and/or multiple phases is given by

G=GT , p , n1, n2,. . . The total differential of the Gibbs energy is written as

dG=−S dT V dp∑ i dni i where we have used the Gibbs equation for the Gibbs energy and the definition of chemical potential ∂ G i= ∂ni T , p ,n   j≠i As we will see in the coming days, the chemical potential is probably the single most powerful quantity we will use in our discussion of thermodynamics. We will use the chemical potential to describe such things as: Single component phase transitions Simple mixtures and binary phase diagrams Electrochemistry

Other areas we won't discuss in as much detail, but also depend on the chemical potential, include: Separation science and retention Adhesion and wetting phenomena Biochemical processes, such as enzymes and metabolism Fuel cells and alternative fuel sources

Chemical Potential of a Single Component System Now, let's consider a single component system for a while. We can write the following relation for the total Gibbs energy in terms of the molar Gibbs energy at some particular T and p: G=nG dG If we take the derivative of this expression, we can write dG=G dn or =G dn If we look at the definition of the chemical potential, we can see that ∂G = =G  ∂ n T , p For a pure material, the chemical potential is equivalent to the molar Gibbs energy. If we continue with a pure material, we can write d =d G =−S dTV dp We also conclude that ∂  ∂  =−S =V ∂ T  p ∂ p T

Because we have criteria for spontaneity in terms of the Gibbs energy, we can write that a spontaneous process is one that reduces the chemical potential.

d G T , p=d 0 With this information, we are prepared to discuss the phase equilibrium of a pure substance.

Phase Transitions of a Pure Component You are all familiar with phase equilibrium. You have seen ice melt and liquid water boil. You should also be familiar with phase diagrams, that indicate the temperature and pressure conditions under which different phases are stable. A generic phase diagram is given in the figure at right. These types of diagrams are generally based on empirical data. We will now develop the underlying thermodynamics that cause these phase transitions to take place.

Let's take a closed system of one component at constant T and p, but allow for two different phases, which we'll call  and  . We would then write the differential of the total Gibbs energy as

dG T , p= dn dn Now, because this is a pure material, any increase in the moles of phase  must have an accompanying decrease in the moles of phase  . Thus, we can write

dn=−dn and dG T , p=−dn Recall our criterion for a spontaneous process, that dGT, p < 0. This means that if dn0 then

−0 or  This tells us that we will have spontaneous conversion from phase  to phase  if this inequality holds. Thus the thermodynamically stable phase is the one with the lower chemical potential. If the chemical potentials are equal, then dGT, p = 0 and the system is at equilibrium.

Changes with T The result we just derived is general; at any given temperature and pressure, the stable phase is the one with the lower chemical potential. If the chemical potentials of the two phases are equal, the two phases exist in equilibrium. When we look at a phase diagram, we see a boundary between the two phases. How does that boundary depend on changes in conditions? We will first look at how the equilibrium boundary depends on temperature.

∂  We already have the general result =−S ∂ T  p Since entropy is always a positive quantity, the chemical potential must decrease as the temperature increases. Let's consider the chemical potential of the solid, liquid and gas phases of a pure substance. We know that the entropy of a condensed phase is less than for the gaseous phase, and the entropy of a solid is less than a liquid. Or, mathematically

Sgas > Sliq > Ssolid Therefore, the chemical potential of a gas will drop more rapidly than that of a liquid, which drops faster than the chemical potential of a solid. Assuming that the entropy of the individual phase is constant with respect to T, we would plot the temperature dependence of the chemical potential (or the Gibbs energy) as seen in the figure.

According to the figure, what happens in terms of phase transitions as the temperature increases?

How would this plot be different for CO2 at 1 atm? The temperature at which the transition occurs from liquid to solid is known at the melting point. If the pressure is our standard pressure, then this is the standard melting point. Likewise, the temperature where a liquid transitions to a gas at the standard pressure is the standard boiling point. It is possible, depending on the chemical potentials of the different species, to go directly from solid to vapor, and if that happens, the temperature at which it occurs is the sublimation point.

Response of Melting to Applied Pressure Let's consider what happens to our melting point as we change the pressure. We know that at a given temperature, the change in chemical potential with changes in pressure is given by ∂  =V ∂ p T Since the molar volume is always a positive quantity, the chemical potential will increase with increasing pressure. If we do this at each temperature, we will see our line of µ vs T move to higher µ. To a first approximation, S won't change much with these changes in pressure, so the slope doesn't change. But, we also have to consider the fact that the molar volume of the different phases can be different. If the molar volume of the liquid is greater than that of the solid, or the density of the liquid is less than the solid, the liquid line will move up more than the solid line. This means the temperature at which they intersect, the melting point, will increase with increasing pressure. However, for water we have the reverse case. The density of the solid is less than the density of the liquid, meaning the molar volume of the solid is greater than that of the liquid and so the solid curve will move up more than the liquid curve. This means that the melting point will decrease as the pressure increases. Response of Boiling to Applied Pressure Using the same logic as we did for melting, what happens to the boiling point as the pressure changes?

Phase Boundaries Now that we have qualitatively discussed how phase transitions depend on the temperature and pressure, we can develop a more quantitative treatment. Let's consider the case of two phases,  and  present in equilibrium at some particular T and p. In order to be at equilibrium, the chemical potential of the two phases must be equal.

  p ,T = p ,T  It is also necessary that T, p and dµ be the same for both phases if we are staying on the phase boundary. We can write for each phase d =−S dT V dp This let's us write

−S dTV dp=−S dT V dp We can collect the pressure and temperature terms and write

V−V dp= S−SdT We now define the entropy and volume changes of the phase transition as

trs S =S−S trs V =V−V This let's us write

dp trs S = dT trs V This is known as the Clapeyron equation. This expression is exact and applies to any phase boundary of a pure substance. We have not made any assumptions in deriving this relation. Keep in mind that we are allowing temperature and pressure to vary and in principle the volume and the entropy of the transition will vary with the conditions. Assuming we know these quantities, this expression gives us the slope of the phase boundary at that point. Now let's look a little more at this equation for particular cases.

Solid-Liquid Phase Boundary – A melting (fusion) process is accompanied by an enthalpy change ∆fusH at any particular temperature. If we know this quantity per mole of material, we know the heat at the pressure of the phase transition. Thus we can write for the entropy

qtrs trs H  S = = trs T T

dp trs H We can put this into our expression to write = dT T trs V If we have data for the enthalpy and the volume of the transition as a function of temperature, we can determine a formula for the phase boundary, which will be a curve on our p-T plot.

p T  fus H  fus H T dT dp dT ∫p∗ =∫T ∗ ≈ ∫T ∗ T  fus V  fus V T Here we have assumed that the enthalpy and volume changes are constant over our temperature range. We then write the approximate phase boundary as

∗  fus H T p≈ p  ln ∗  fus V T If the temperature range is narrow, we can approximate the ln term as

T T −T ∗ T−T ∗ ln =ln 1 ≈ T ∗  T ∗  T ∗ This let's us write

∗  fus H ∗ p≈ p  ∗ T −T  T  fus V So if we start at some temperature T *, the phase boundary is a steep straight line on a p-T plot. What about the slope of this line? ∆fusH > 0 is always true; it always takes heat to make a solid melt.

However, ∆fusV can be positive or negative, depending on the relative density of the liquid and solid. For most materials, the solid is more dense than the liquid, so the volume increases upon melting. Thus the p-T line will have a positive slope. With water, however, the liquid density is greater than that of the solid, so this line has a negative slope. The completely agrees with our result from above, as it should. Liquid-Vapor Boundary – Let's go back to our earlier statement of the Clapeyron equation, but now write it for a liquid-vapor phase boundary.

dp vap H = dT T vap V Because the molar volume of a gas is much larger than that of the liquid, we can treat the volume change as simply the volume of the gas; vap V ≈V g . If we then treat the gas as ideal, we can write

dp vap H 1 dp d ln p vap H = or = = dT T RT / p p dT dT RT 2 This is known as the Clausius – Clapeyron equation and is an approximation for the liquid-vapor phase boundary. How would we get a better expression for this phase boundary?

As we did before, we can determine a formula for the phase boundary by integrating this expression

ln p T p vap H dT −vap H 1 1 d ln p ln ∫ln p∗ = ∗ = ∫T ∗ 2 = − ∗ p R T R  T T  ∗ p −vap H 1 1 vap H T −T  ln = − = p∗ R T T ∗  R T T ∗

This is only an approximation, based on the assumption that we can treat ∆vapH as a constant. If we want to evaluate this boundary over a wider temperature range, we have to account for the temperature dependence on the enthalpy of vaporization. It should be noted that ∆vapH approaches zero as T approaches the critical temperature. Thus, there is no phase boundary above Tc.

Solid-Vapor Phase Boundary – The Clausius – Clapeyron equation also applies to the boundary between the solid and vapor phases, again because the volume of the vapor is much greater than the volume of the solid. Also, recall that ∆subH = ∆fusıH + ∆vapH, so we would write

∗ p subl H T −T  ln = p∗ R T T ∗ and the solid-vapor line should be steeper than the liquid-vapor line at similar temperatures.

Note on standard states – It should be noted that all pressures should be defined relative to our standard pressure. This makes sense from a consideration of the units of our expressions. In deriving the Clausius – Clapeyron equation, we switched from p to ln p, but you may be concerned about the units when we do this. Because we are writing a differential equation, we can always add a constant factor and not change the derivative. Thus, in the step when we used 1 dp=d ln p p we should technically write 1 p dp=d ln p−d ln po=d ln p po where p° is our standard pressure. Because p° is a fixed point, its derivative is zero, so we can add it, or the derivative of its ln, without changing our equation. Writing the expression in this way keeps our units constant. Because p° is usually taken to be 1 bar, it is often dropped in the expression of the Clausius – Clapeyron equation. When we integrate the equation, the standard state is removed from the expression. So, the way we wrote it works and is a simpler notation, but you need to keep in mind that all pressures are with respect to the standard state pressure.

Vapor Pressure and Liquid/Gas Coexistence We know from our own observations that when we have a sample of liquid there exists some amount of vapor of that material. For example, if we have a closed container of a particular liquid and we remove all the gas from it, there will be some pressure still in the container, from the vapor of the substance. This amount of pressure is known as the vapor pressure. We can use the chemical potential to determine the vapor pressure of a pure material at conditions other than the equilibrium phase boundary. We define the standard boiling point as the temperature at which a liquid boils at 1 bar pressure. If we know these points, we can approximately determine the vapor pressure at any other temperature by evaluating the Clausius – Clapeyron equation for the temperature of interest. An alternate form of this equation is

d ln p −vap H = d 1/T  R (You will derive this form of the equation in the homework.) This equation tells us that the ln of the vapor pressure should decrease linearly with the reciprocal temperature. This is what is experimentally observed sufficiently far from the critical point. As with many properties, vapor pressures for many liquids are tabulated.

Degrees of Freedom and the Triple Point For a pure material, keeping amount fixed constant, we have three variables, or degrees of freedom, T, p and Vm. However, because of the equation of state, we can only independently vary two of them. If we require that we keep two phases in equilibrium, that brings in an additional constraint. Now, we can only vary one parameter, such as the pressure. The temperature is fixed by the Clapeyron equation and the volume is fixed by the equation of state. Each constraint removes a degree of freedom. If we want to have three phases in equilibrium with each other, that adds another constraint, meaning we can't change any of the state variables. This is why phase diagrams have triple points, which are invariant. This is also why you can't have a point in a single component phase diagram where more than three phase are in equilibrium; that would require negative degrees of freedom, which doesn't make physical sense. PHASE EQUILIBRIUM

 Component : is either pure metal and/or compound of which an alloy is composed. They refer to the independent chemical species that comprise the system.  Solid Solution : It consists of atoms of at least two different types where solute atoms occupy either substitutional or interstitial positions in the solvent lattice and the crystal structure of the solvent is maintained.  Solubility limit : for almost all alloy systems, at specific temperature, a maximum of solute atoms can dissolve in solvent phase to form a solid solution. The limit is known as solubility limit.  Phase : defined as a homogenous portion of a system that has uniform physical and chemical characteristics i.e. it is a physically distinct from other phases, chemically homogenous and mechanically separable portion of a system.  Variable of a system : theses include two external variables namely temperature and pressure along with internal variable such as composition © and number of phases (P). Number of independent variable among these gives the degree of freedom (F).  They are given by Gibbs Phase rule

P + F = C + 2 EQUILIBRIUM PHASE DIAGRAM

 A diagram that depicts existence of different phases of a system under equilibrium is termed as phase diagram. Equilibrium phase diagrams represent the relationships between temperature and the compositions and the quantities of phases at equilibrium. In general practice it is sufficient to consider only solid and liquid phases, thus pressure is assumed to be constant (1 atm.) in most applications. CONTD …

 Important information obtainable from a phase diagram can be summarized as follows:

 To show phases are present at different compositions and temperatures under slow cooling (equilibrium) conditions.  To indicate equilibrium solid solubility of one element/compound in another.  To indicate temperature at which an alloy starts to solidify and the range of solidification.  To indicate the temperature at which different phases start to melt.  Amount of each phase in a twophase mixture can be obtained.  A phase diagram is actually a collection of solubility limit curves. Set of solubility curves that represents locus of temperatures above which all compositions are liquid are called liquidus, while solidus represents set of solubility curves that denotes the locus of temperatures below which all compositions are solid. Every phase diagram for two or more components must show a liquidus and a solidus. Phase diagrams are classified based on the number of components in the system. Single component systems have unary diagrams, twocomponent systems have binary diagrams, threecomponent systems are represented by ternary diagrams, and so on. When more than two components are present, phase diagrams become extremely complicated and difficult to represent. UNARY PHASE DIAGRAM

 In these systems there is no composition change (C=1), thus only variables are temperature and pressure. Thus in region of single phase two variables (temperature and pressure) can be varied independently. If two phases coexist then, according to Phase rule, either temperature or pressure can be varied independently, but not both. At triple points, three phases can coexist at a particular set of temperature and pressure. At these points, neither temperature nor the pressure can be changed without disrupting the equilibrium i.e. one of the phases may disappear.

BINARY PHASE DIAGRAM

 Binary phase diagrams are maps that represent the relationships between temperature and the compositions and quantities of phases at equilibrium, which influence the microstructure of an alloy. Many microstructures develop from phase transformations, the changes that occur when the temperature is altered (ordinarily upon cooling).This may involve the transition from one phase to another, or the appearance or disappearance of a phase. Binary phase diagrams are helpful in predicting phase transformations and the resulting microstructures, which may have equilibrium or nonequilibrium character.

DETERMINATION OF PHASE AMOUNTS  The tie line must be utilized in conjunction with a procedure that is often called the lever rule , which is applied as follows:  1. The tie line is constructed across the twophase region at the temperature of the alloy.  2. The overall alloy composition is located on the tie line.  3. The fraction of one phase is computed by taking the length of tie line from the overall alloy composition to the phase boundary for the other phase, and dividing by the total tie line length.  4. The fraction of the other phase determined in the same manner.  The tie line has been constructed that was used for the determination of and L phase compositions. Let the overall alloy composition be located along the tie line and denoted as and mass fractions be represented by

WL and Wa for the respective phases. From the lever rule, WL may be computed according to DEVELOPMENT OF MICROSTRUCTURE IN ISOMORPHOUS ALLOYS BINARY EUTECTIC SYSTEMS

 A number of features of this phase diagram are important: First, three singlephase regions are found on the diagram: , b, and liquid. The phase is a solid solution rich in copper; it has silver as the solute component and an FCC crystal structure. The b phase solid solution also has an FCC structure, but copper is the solute. Pure copper and pure silver are also considered to be and b phases, respectively.  Thus, the solubility in each of these solid phases is limited, in that at any temperature below line BEG only a limited concentration of silver will dissolve in Copper and similarly for copper in silver. CUAG BINARY EUTECTIC SYSTEM PBSN BINARY EUTECTIC SYSTEM

IRON CARBON SYSTEM

 Of all binary alloy systems, the one that is possibly the most important is that for iron and carbon. Both steels and cast irons, primary structural materials in every technologically advanced culture, are essentially iron– carbon alloys. Pure iron, upon heating, experiences two changes in crystal structure before it melts. At room temperature the stable form, called ferrite, or iron, has a BCC crystal structure. Ferrite experiences a polymorphic transformation to FCC austenite, or γ iron, at 912°C or (1674F). This austenite persists to 1394°C (2541F), at which temperature the FCC austenite reverts back to a BCC phase known as δ ferrite, which finally melts at 1538°C. All these changes are apparent along the left vertical axis of the phase diagram. INVARIANT REACTION