Partial Separation of an Azeotropic Mixture of Hydrogen Chloride and Water and Copper (II) Chloride Recovery for Optimization of the Copper-Chlorine Cycle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Partial Separation of an Azeotropic Mixture of Hydrogen Chloride and Water and Copper (II) Chloride Recovery for Optimization of the Copper-Chlorine Cycle Partial Separation of an Azeotropic Mixture of Hydrogen Chloride and Water and Copper (II) Chloride Recovery for Optimization of the Copper-Chlorine Cycle by Matthew P. Lescisin A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Applied Science in The Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Mechanical Engineering University of Ontario Institute of Technology September 2017 © Matthew P. Lescisin, 2017 Contents Contents ii Abstract v Acknowledgments vi List of Figures vii List of Tables viii Nomenclature ix Quantities...................................... ix Greek Letters.................................... x Subscripts...................................... xi Acronyms...................................... xi 1 Introduction1 2 Background4 2.1 Boiling in the Subcooled Liquid Region .................. 4 2.2 Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium (VLE)...................... 5 2.3 Phase Diagrams................................ 5 2.3.1 Tie-Lines ............................... 6 2.4 Distillation .................................. 6 2.5 Azeotropes .................................. 8 3 Literature Review9 3.1 Azeotropic Distillation............................ 9 3.2 Extractive Distillation............................ 10 3.3 Pressure-Swing Distillation .......................... 11 3.4 Batch Mode.................................. 13 3.5 Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns.................... 13 3.5.1 Heat-Integrated PSD......................... 14 ii CONTENTS iii 3.6 Reflux Ratio ................................. 15 3.7 HETP Correlations.............................. 15 3.8 Outcome of the Literature Review ..................... 15 4 The Effect of Metastability on Crystallization 17 4.1 Crystallization Results and Discussion................... 18 4.2 Metastability ................................. 18 4.2.1 Metastability Experimental Method ................ 20 4.2.2 Formulation of Metastability & Equilibrium............ 20 4.2.3 Metastability Results and Discussion................. 21 4.2.4 Metastability Conclusions...................... 25 5 Distillation Simulation 26 5.1 Thermodynamic Models........................... 26 5.2 Simulation Setup................................ 27 5.3 Simulation Results.............................. 28 5.3.1 Pressure-Swing Distillation ..................... 28 5.3.2 Single-Column Distillation...................... 34 5.4 Simulation Conclusion............................ 34 6 Apparatus Design 36 6.1 Column Pressure................................ 37 6.2 Experimental Setup Components....................... 37 6.2.1 Estimation of Mass Loss due to Corrosion............. 38 6.3 Output Analysis ............................... 39 6.3.1 Non-Applicability of Raoult’s Law................. 40 6.3.2 Determining xHCl ........................... 40 7 Column Geometry 42 7.1 Number of Stages............................... 42 7.2 Column Height................................ 43 7.2.1 Method of Transfer Units...................... 43 7.2.2 Empirical Correlations........................ 45 7.3 Column Diameter............................... 48 7.4 Location of Feed Stage............................ 48 8 Measurement and Control 50 8.1 Temperature Measurement ......................... 50 8.2 Column Heating ................................ 51 8.3 Control System................................. 51 8.3.1 Schmitt Trigger............................. 51 8.3.2 PID Control ............................. 52 iv CONTENTS 8.3.3 Electrical Design........................... 56 9 Apparatus Operation 58 9.1 Experimental Procedure........................... 58 10 Distillation Experimental Results and Discussion 60 10.1 Analysis of the Column Outputs ...................... 60 10.1.1 Comparison of Experimental Results and Simulation Results . 62 10.2 Weaknesses & Limitations in the Results.................. 62 10.2.1 Corrosion Product.......................... 62 10.2.2 Vapour Pressure of the Vapour Phase ............... 62 10.3 Uncertainty Analysis............................. 64 10.3.1 Systematic Error........................... 64 10.3.2 Random Error ............................ 64 10.3.3 Method of Kline & McClintock................... 65 10.4 Distillation Conclusions and Recommendations.............. 66 11 Conclusions and Recommendations 68 References 70 Appendix A Scripts 76 A.1 McCabe-Thiele Method ........................... 76 A.2 Method of Kline & McClintock....................... 80 Appendix B Crystallization Results 86 Abstract An atmospheric-pressure distillation system is designed and constructed to partially separate hydrochloric acid and water. The system concentrates HCl(aq) between the electrolyzer and hydrolysis steps of the Copper-Chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle. Thus, the system partially recycles HCl(aq), thereby decreasing the total operating cost of the cycle. The separation is only partial, as the mixture is unable to cross the azeotrope with only a single pressure. The distillation system consists primarily of one packed distillation column, which employs heating tapes and thermocouples to achieve a desired axial temperature profile. The column can be operated in batch or continuous mode. After performing physical distillation experiments, it is found that feeds less than azeotropic concentration are separated into H2O(l) and highly-concentrated HCl(aq) (albeit at less than azeotropic concentration). Feeds greater than azeotropic concentration are not investigated as they are extremely corrosive (rich in HCl) and would likely destroy the apparatus. Corrosion product is prevalent in the bottoms product; it is a source of error that is partially mitigated by filtration. No correlation is found between feed concentration and output concentration. That is, the distillate is H2O(l) and the bottoms is HCl(aq) near azeotropic concentration; as long as the feed concentration is any value less than azeotropic. In other words, the degree of separation is found to be independent of the feed concentration, for feed concentrations less than azeotropic. The bottoms concentration varies from experiment to experiment, but does so randomly, likely the result of corrosion impurities affecting the calculation of its concentration. A simulation of pressure-swing distillation (PSD) is also performed to help determine the feasibility of HCl-H2O separation and the degree of separation. Furthermore, an investigation into metastability and its effect on the crystallization of CuCl2 from HCl(aq) solutions is presented in Chapter4. v Acknowledgments Dr. K. Pope, Dr. M. A. Rosen and Dr. O. A. Jianu are very gratefully acknowledged for their advice and guidance throughout this project. The financial assistance of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Ontario Research Fund (ORF) and Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) is gratefully acknowledged. vi List of Figures 1.1 Schematic of the Cu-Cl cycle [2] ...................... 2 2.1 Example Phase Diagram........................... 6 2.2 Distillation Example.............................. 7 3.1 Azeotropic Distillation Example [7]..................... 10 4.1 Hysteresis Loop of Metastability ...................... 19 4.2 Experimental Data on MSZW of CuCl2 in H2O.............. 22 4.3 Effect of Cooling Rate on MSZW for CuCl2 in H2O ........... 23 4.4 Solubility of CuCl2 Dissolving in HCl Solutions of Different Molarities . 24 5.1 COCO (UNIQUAC) Phase Diagram at 1 bar ................ 27 5.2 Chemcad Phase Diagram .......................... 30 5.3 Chemcad Process Flow Diagram ...................... 30 5.4 Simulation Results: Tray Compositions .................. 33 5.5 Chemcad process flow diagram of single column distillation. 34 6.1 Output Chamber Detail........................... 38 6.2 Bottoms including corrosion product..................... 41 7.1 McCabe-Thiele Method ........................... 43 7.2 Equilibrium Concentrations......................... 44 ∗ 7.3 Plot of 1/(yi − yi) vs. y ........................... 44 8.1 Thermocouple locations and temperature zones.............. 50 8.2 Control diagram for n temperature zones ................. 53 8.3 Schmitt trigger flowchart .......................... 53 8.4 PID control flowchart ............................ 54 8.5 Electrical control schematic.......................... 57 vii List of Tables 4.1 Nucleation Order and Nucleation Rate Constants for Several HCl Concen- trations .................................... 22 4.2 Nucleation Order and Rate for CuCl2 in H2O-HCl............ 23 5.1 Simulation Results: Stream Compositions................. 28 5.2 Simulation Results: LPC Distillation Profile................ 29 5.3 Simulation Results: HPC Distillation Profile................. 31 5.4 Simulation Results: LPC Tray Composition Data.............. 31 5.5 Simulation Results: HPC Tray Composition Data............. 32 5.6 Single-Column Simulation Results ..................... 34 6.1 Corrosion Resistance, Data from [41].................... 38 6.2 Parameters for Calculating mlost ...................... 39 7.1 Parameters for Calculating HTU...................... 46 7.2 Parameters used in Equation 7.9 to Calculate DV . 46 7.3 Values used to Calculate Empirical Correlations for HETP......... 47 7.4 Results of Empirical Correlations for HETP................. 47 7.5 Parameters for Calculating Column Diameter............... 49 8.1 Parameters for Calculating Column Heat Input.............. 52 10.1 Measured Densities and Calculated Concentrations............. 61 10.2 Comparison of Experimental Results and Simulation Results
Recommended publications
  • The Separation of Three Azeotropes by Extractive Distillation by An-I Yeh A
    The separation of three azeotropes by extractive distillation by An-I Yeh A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Chemical Engineering Montana State University © Copyright by An-I Yeh (1983) Abstract: Several different kinds of extractive distillation agents were investigated to affect the separation of three binary liquid mixtures, isopropyl ether - acetone, methyl acetate - methanol, and isopropyl ether - methyl ethyl ketone. Because of the small size of the extractive distillation column, relative volatilities were assumed constant and the Fenske equation was used to calculate the relative volatilities and the number of minimum theoretical plates. Dimethyl sulfoxide was found to be a good extractive distillation agent. Extractive distillation when employing a proper agent not only negated the azeotropes of the above mixtures, but also improved the efficiency of separation. This process could reverse the relative volatility of isopropyl ether and acetone. This reversion was also found in the system of methyl acetate and methanol when nitrobenzene was the agent. However, normal distillation curves were obtained for the system of isopropyl ether and methyl ethyl ketone undergoing extractive distillation. In the system of methyl acetate and methanol, the relative volatility decreased as the agents' carbon number increased when glycols were used as the agents. In addition, the oxygen number and the locations of hydroxyl groups in the glycols used were believed to affect the values of relative volatility. An appreciable amount of agent must be maintained in the column to affect separation. When dimethyl sulfoxide was an agent for the three systems studied, the relative volatility increased as the addition rate increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Process for N-Butanol Recovery from Abe
    937 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 74, 2019 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.cetjournal.it Guest Editors: Sauro Pierucci, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Laura Piazza Copyright © 2019, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. ISBN 978-88-95608-71-6; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1974157 Development of a Process for N-Butanol Recovery from Abe Wastewater Streams by Membrane Technology * Marco Stoller , Marco Bravi, Paola Russo, Roberto Bubbico, Barbara Mazzarotta Sapienza University of Rome, Dept. of Chemical Materials Environmental Engineering, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy [email protected] The aceton-butyl-ethanolic fermentation process (ABE) is a biotechnological process that leads to the production of acetone, n-butanol and ethanol (ABE compounds) from glucose sources and amides by use of certain biomasses. The process was developed initially during the middle of the last century and suffers from decline due to the greater petrochemical production of products and the lowering of the costs of the sector. Nowadays, the ABE process is regaining great interest because the fraction with the highest concentration, i.e. n-butanol, is an excellent constituent for biofuels. The ABE process has been optimized over time to obtain maximum yields of n-butanol, but the problem of separating and concentrating the butanol in the outlet stream of the ABE process persists. To allow an adequate use, often distillation by use of more columns is required. Moreover, the contained biomasses and suspended solids, in high quantity, must be eliminated, leading to overall high treatment costs. This work will report the main idea and some preliminary experimental results for the development and application of a process based on membrane technologies, to separate and concentrate the butanol from ABE process streams to sensibly reduce the difficulty to perform a final distillation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Azeotropic Dehydration for the Preservation of Shrimp. James Edward Rutledge Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1969 Evaluation of Azeotropic Dehydration for the Preservation of Shrimp. James Edward Rutledge Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Rutledge, James Edward, "Evaluation of Azeotropic Dehydration for the Preservation of Shrimp." (1969). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1689. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1689 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 70-9089 microfilmed exactly as received RUTLEDGE, James Edward, 1941- EVALUATION OF AZEOTROPIC DEHYDRATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF SHRIMP. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, PhJD., 1969 Food Technology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Evaluation of Azeotropic Dehydration for the Preservation of Shrimp A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Food Science and Technology by James Edward Rutledge B.S., Texas A&M University, 1963 M.S., Texas A&M University, 1966 August, 1969 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to his major professor, Dr, Fred H. Hoskins, for the guidance which he supplied not only in respect to this dissertation but also in regard to the author’s graduate career at Louisiana State University, Gratitude is also extended to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • FUGACITY It Is Simply a Measure of Molar Gibbs Energy of a Real Gas
    FUGACITY It is simply a measure of molar Gibbs energy of a real gas . Modifying the simple equation for the chemical potential of an ideal gas by introducing the concept of a fugacity (f). The fugacity is an “ effective pressure” which forces the equation below to be true for real gases: θθθ f µµµ ,p( T) === µµµ (T) +++ RT ln where pθ = 1 atm pθθθ A plot of the chemical potential for an ideal and real gas is shown as a function of the pressure at constant temperature. The fugacity has the units of pressure. As the pressure approaches zero, the real gas approach the ideal gas behavior and f approaches the pressure. 1 If fugacity is an “effective pressure” i.e, the pressure that gives the right value for the chemical potential of a real gas. So, the only way we can get a value for it and hence for µµµ is from the gas pressure. Thus we must find the relation between the effective pressure f and the measured pressure p. let f = φ p φ is defined as the fugacity coefficient. φφφ is the “fudge factor” that modifies the actual measured pressure to give the true chemical potential of the real gas. By introducing φ we have just put off finding f directly. Thus, now we have to find φ. Substituting for φφφ in the above equation gives: p µ=µ+(p,T)θ (T) RT ln + RT ln φ=µ (ideal gas) + RT ln φ pθ µµµ(p,T) −−− µµµ(ideal gas ) === RT ln φφφ This equation shows that the difference in chemical potential between the real and ideal gas lies in the term RT ln φφφ.φ This is the term due to molecular interaction effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Extractive Distillation. Process Design, Operation
    Review of Extractive Distillation. Process design, operation optimization and control Vincent Gerbaud, Ivonne Rodríguez-Donis, Laszlo Hegely, Péter Láng, Ferenc Dénes, Xinqiang You To cite this version: Vincent Gerbaud, Ivonne Rodríguez-Donis, Laszlo Hegely, Péter Láng, Ferenc Dénes, et al.. Review of Extractive Distillation. Process design, operation optimization and control. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Elsevier, 2019, 141, pp.229-271. 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.020. hal-02161920 HAL Id: hal-02161920 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02161920 Submitted on 21 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible This is an author’s version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/239894 Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.020 To cite this version: Gerbaud, Vincent and Rodríguez-Donis, Ivonne and Hegely, Laszlo and Láng, Péter and Dénes, Ferenc and You, Xinqiang Review of Extractive Distillation. Process design, operation optimization and control. (2018) Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 141.
    [Show full text]
  • By a 965% ATT'ys
    July 19, 1960 A. WATZL ETAL 2,945,788 PROCESS FOR THE PURIFICATION OF DIMETHYLTEREPHTHALATE Filed Nov. 19, l956 AZEOTROPE DISTILLATE CONDENSER CONDENSED WACUUM DISTILLATE DRY DISTILLATION MXTURE N2 COLUMN MPURE - SOD WACUUMFILTER ETHYLENE DMETHYL DMETHYL GLYCOL TEREPHTHALATE TEREPHTHALATE ETHYLENE GLYCOL INVENTORS: ANTON WATZL by aERHARD 965% SIGGEL ATT'YS 2,945,788 Patented July 19, 1960 2 phthalate is immediately suitable for reesterification or Subsequent polycondensation to polyethylene terephthal 2,945,788 ate. There are gained polycondensates of high degree of PROCESS FOR THE PURIFICATION OF viscosity with K values from 50 to 57. DMETHYLTEREPHTHALATE The best mode contemplated for practicing the inven Anton Watz, Kleinwallstadt (Ufr), and Erhard Siggel, tion involves the use of ethylene glycol as the aliphatic Laudenbach (Main), Germany, assignors to Vereinigte glycol. The following is a specific illustration thereof. Glanzstoff-Fabriken A.G., Wuppertal-Elberfeld, Ger Example many Thirty grams of crude dimethylterephthalate are mixed Filed Nov.19, 1956, Ser. No. 622,778 in a flask with 270 grams of ethylene glycol and azeo tropically distilled with the introduction of dry nitrogen 4 Claims. (C. 202-42) in a column of 30 cm. at about 44 Torr (1 Torr equals 1 mm. Hg). The azeotrope goes over at about 120° C. i This invention, in general, relates to production of into a cooled condenser. The dimethylterephthalate dimethylterephthalate and more particularly to the puri 5 separated from the glycol by vacuum filtering can be fication thereof. used immediately for reesterification or for polyconden The purification of dimethylterephthalate can be car sation. This process is illustrated in the flow sheet of ried out either by distillation or by recrystallization from the accompanying drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneous Azeotropic Distillation
    PROSIMPLUS APPLICATION EXAMPLE HETEROGENEOUS AZEOTROPIC DISTILLATION EXAMPLE PURPOSE This example illustrates a high purity separation process of an azeotropic mixture (ethanol-water) through heterogeneous azeotropic distillation. This process includes distillation columns. Additionally these rigorous multi- stage separation modules are part of a recycling stream, demonstrating the efficiency of ProSimPlus convergence methods. Specifications are set on output streams in order to insure the required purity. This example illustrates the way to set "non-standard" specifications in the multi-stage separation modules. Three phase calculations (vapor-liquid- liquid) are done with the taken into account of possible liquid phase splitting. ACCESS Free-Internet Restricted to ProSim clients Restricted Confidential CORRESPONDING PROSIMPLUS FILE PSPS_EX_EN-Heterogeneous-Azeotropic-Distillation.pmp3 . Reader is reminded that this use case is only an example and should not be used for other purposes. Although this example is based on actual case it may not be considered as typical nor are the data used always the most accurate available. ProSim shall have no responsibility or liability for damages arising out of or related to the use of the results of calculations based on this example. Copyright © 2009 ProSim, Labège, France - All rights reserved www.prosim.net Heterogeneous azeotropic distillation Version: March, 2009 Page: 2 / 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROCESS MODELING 3 1.1. Process description 3 1.2. Process flowsheet 5 1.3. Specifications 6 1.4. Components 6 1.5. Thermodynamic model 7 1.6. Operating conditions 7 1.7. "Hints and Tips" 9 2. RESULTS 9 2.1. Comments on results 9 2.2. Mass and energy balances 10 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Distillation ­ Accessscience from Mcgraw­Hill Education
    6/19/2017 Distillation ­ AccessScience from McGraw­Hill Education (http://www.accessscience.com/) Distillation Article by: King, C. Judson University of California, Berkeley, California. Last updated: 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1036/1097­8542.201100 (https://doi.org/10.1036/1097­8542.201100) Content Hide Simple distillations Fractional distillation Vapor­liquid equilibria Distillation pressure Molecular distillation Extractive and azeotropic distillation Enhancing energy efficiency Computational methods Stage efficiency Links to Primary Literature Additional Readings A method for separating homogeneous mixtures based upon equilibration of liquid and vapor phases. Substances that differ in volatility appear in different proportions in vapor and liquid phases at equilibrium with one another. Thus, vaporizing part of a volatile liquid produces vapor and liquid products that differ in composition. This outcome constitutes a separation among the components in the original liquid. Through appropriate configurations of repeated vapor­liquid contactings, the degree of separation among components differing in volatility can be increased manyfold. See also: Phase equilibrium (/content/phase­equilibrium/505500) Distillation is by far the most common method of separation in the petroleum, natural gas, and petrochemical industries. Its many applications in other industries include air fractionation, solvent recovery and recycling, separation of light isotopes such as hydrogen and deuterium, and production of alcoholic beverages, flavors, fatty acids, and food oils. Simple distillations The two most elementary forms of distillation are a continuous equilibrium distillation and a simple batch distillation (Fig. 1). http://www.accessscience.com/content/distillation/201100 1/10 6/19/2017 Distillation ­ AccessScience from McGraw­Hill Education Fig. 1 Simple distillations. (a) Continuous equilibrium distillation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue Free Water Tritium Separation from Foodstuffs by Azeotropic Distillation
    140 SK98K0361 21st RHDJasna podChopkom TISSUE FREE WATER TRITIUM SEPARATION FROM FOODSTUFFS BY AZEOTROPIC DISTILLATION Florentina Constantin, Ariadna Ciubotaru, DecebalPopa Inspectorate of Public Health of Bucharest, Romania 1. INTRODUCTION The actual tritium content in the environment is due to both natural production by cosmic ray interactions in the upper atmosphere and to varying amount of man- made tritium. Tritium, the radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is one of the most important radionuclide released to the environment during the normal operation of a typical nuclear power reactor. Tritiated water constitutes almost the entire radioactivity in liquid waste discharged to the environment from heavy water reactors. Therefore, monitoring tritium in air, precipitation, drinking water and vegetation is necessary for assessing the environmental impact of tritium releases in gaseous and liquid effluents from nuclear plants. The use for agricultural purposes of river water receiving releases of tritium, results in contamination of irrigated crops and then in the contamination of the food chain. ? Tritium is everywhere in living matter, has a long physical half-time (T= 12.26 y) and is known to follow protium pathways in biological material. Tritium in liquid or solid biota samples can not be easily determined quantitatively by any kind of nondestructive analysis because its beta radiation energy (E =18 keV) is so weak that the most part is absorbed in the sample. Therefore, most non-aqueous samples must be treated chemically or physically to be suitable for counting. The choice of preparation method will depend on the type of samples, number and quantities of samples to be processed and availability of measurement equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Distillation • Use of Triangular Graphs
    Lecture 15. Enhanced Distillation and Supercritical Extraction (1) [Ch. 11] • Enhanced Distillation • Use of Triangular Graphs - Zeotropic mixture -Mixture forming one minimum-boiling azeotrope - Mixture forming two minimum-boiling azeotropes • Residue-Curve Maps • Distillation-Curve Maps • Product-Composition Regions at Total Reflux Enhanced Distillation • Cases when ordinary distillation is not economical - Boiling point difference between components is less than 50℃ - Relative volatility is less than 1.10 - Mixture forms an azeotrope • Enhanced distillation - Extractive distillation : adding a large amount of solvent - Salt distillation : adding a soluble , ionic salt - Pressure-swing distillation : operating at two different pressures - Homogeneous azeotropic distillation : adding an entrainer - Heterogeneous azeotropic distillation : adding an entrainer - Reactive distillation : adding a separating agent to react selectively and reversibly with feed component(s) Zeotropic vs. Azeotropic Systems Binary zeotropic system Binary azeotropic system P = constant AtAzeotrope C T-y T-x Pure B xA, yA Pure A Use of Triangular Graphs • Triangular vapor-liquid diagram for ternary mixture - Too complex to understand • Plot with only equilibr ium liquid composition fofoatenayr a ternary mixture - Easy to understand -Convenient to use - Provide useful information in distillation of ternary components . Residue curve . Distill ati on curve Distillation Curves for Ternary Systems Each curve in each diagram is the locus of possible equilibrium liquid-phase
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Complete Extractive and Azeotropic Distillation Processes for Anhydrous Ethanol Production Using Aspen Plustm Simu
    43 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 80, 2020 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.cetjournal.it Guest Editors: Eliseo Maria Ranzi, Rubens Maciel Filho Copyright © 2020, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. DOI: 10.3303/CET2080008 ISBN 978-88-95608-78-5; ISSN 2283-9216 Comparison of Complete Extractive and Azeotropic Distillation Processes for Anhydrous Ethanol Production using Aspen PlusTM Simulator Nahieh T. Miranda*, Rubens Maciel Filho, Maria Regina Wolf Maciel Laboratory of Optimization, Design, and Advanced Control (LOPCA)/Laboratory of Development of Separation Processes (LDPS), School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Brazil. [email protected] Performance of the extractive and azeotropic distillation processes using ethylene glycol and cyclohexane as solvents, respectively, for anhydrous ethanol production, were investigated using 02 RadFrac columns each and solvent recycling streams via simulation in Aspen Plus™ Simulator. Both operate at 1 atm, and feed flow -1 rate equals to 100 kmol.h (ethanol – 0.896 and water – 0.104 in mole fractions at the azeotropic point). The NRTL-RK was the model used for extractive and azeotropic distillations. The anhydrous ethanol purity from top of the 1st column of the extractive distillation (22 stages) was 99.50 % (on a mole basis) and water with nd st 99.20 % of purity at the top of the 2 column. On the other hand, in the azeotropic distillation, the 1 column (30 stages) had a bottom product of anhydrous ethanol purity of 99.99 % and water with 99.99 % of purity in the 2nd column, also at the bottom. Both processes produced anhydrous ethanol with a high-grade purity required by the standard norms ASTM D4806, EN 15376, and ANP 36.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Dimethyl Carbonate and Methanol Mixture by Pervaporation Using Hybsi Ceramic Membrane
    Separation of dimethyl carbonate and methanol mixture by pervaporation using HybSi ceramic membrane Dissertation presented by Antoine GOFFINET for obtaining the master's degree in Chemical and Materials Engineering Supervisors Patricia LUIS ALCONERO Readers Iwona CYBULSKA, Denis DOCHAIN, Wenqi LI Academic year 2017-2018 Abstract In the current context of high biodiesel production, some by-products are created partic- ularly glycerol. Glycerol has a wide range of applications however its market is supersatu- rated as its production is very high. A solution found is the production of a value added com- ponent from glycerol. This value added component is the glycerol carbonate (GC) produced by transesterification reaction of glycerol with dimethyl carbonate (DMC). The reaction in- cludes four components: glycerol, DMC, GC and methanol. As methanol and DMC make up an azeotropic mixture, it is not possible to separate them by distillation. Pervaporation is a solution for this separation as it can break the azeotrope mixture and have other advantages especially energy saving. The pervaporation using polymeric membrane presents disadvan- tages as the low thermally and chemically resistance. Therefore another kind of membrane is needed. As ceramic membrane resistance is higher, the commercial HybSi ceramic is se- lected for this thesis experiments. This study aim to analyse the separation of DMC and methanol by pervaporation. The separation performance of HybSi membrane is evaluated at 40-50-60◦C with binary mixture of different concentrations. The permeation through the membrane is analysed by the solution-diffusion model. h kg i The results showed low permeate flux between 0 and 0.86 hm2 .
    [Show full text]