Original Report Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Broken Lt 18 Con 6

orIgInAl rePort

stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Broken lt 18 con 6 jones; Broken lt 19 con 6 jones; lt 20 con 6 jones except Pts 1 & 2, 49r11289; S/T Jo206 Municipality Of The Township Of Madawaska Valley

Report Author: Luke Dalla Bona Woodland Heritage Services Limited 308 Queen Street E Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 1Z1 Telephone: 705-256-5418 E-Mail: [email protected] Province of Ontario, Licence to Conduct Consultng Archaeology P065-2015 (Woodland Heritage Services Limited)

Project Informaton: Stage 1, Litle Bark Lake PIF # P065-0255-2016

Proponent Informaton: Mr. Neil Enright Natonal Fur Farms Inc 118 Annie Mayhew Road Combermere,Ontario K0J 1L0

p: 480 363 6558 e: [email protected]

Report Completed: February 29, 2016

Project Personnel ...... 1

Project Background ...... 2

Development Context ...... 2

Historical Context ...... 2

Archaeological Context ...... 6

Recommendatons...... 8

Advice on Compliance with Legislaton ...... 9

References Cited ...... 10

Figure 1. Locaton of the Litle Bark Lake study area, Renfrew County, Ontario...... 11 Figure 2. Property index map for the subject property at Litle Bark Lake...... 12 Figure 3. 1:8000 scale topographic map of the Litle Bark Lake study area, Renfrew County, Ontario...... 13 Figure 4. 1:8000 scale aerial photography of the Litle Bark Lake study area, Renfrew County, Ontario...... 14 Figure 5. Original 1862 survey map of Jones Township. Litle Bark Lake is highlighted in red...... 15 Figure 6. Proponent’s proposed development map for the subject property...... 16 Figure 7. Development map showing the original road allowance around Scot’s Lake and fooded lands between the original Scot’s Lake shoreline and the current shoreline of Litle Bark Lake/Bark Lake...... 17 Figure 8. Areas of archaeology potental that require Stage 2 archaeological assessment...... 18

Mr. Neil Enright of Natonal Fur Farms Inc of Combermere, Ontario contracted Woodland Heritage Services Limited to conduct a Stage 1 archaeological assessment of their property located at Broken Lt 18 Con 6 Jones; Broken Lt 19 Con 6 Jones; Lt 20 Con 6 Jones Except Pts 1 & 2, 49R11289; S/T Jo206 Municipality Of The Township Of Madawaska Valley in Renfrew County.

The proponent is planning to sub-divide the property.

The archaeological assessment was undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990), the The Planning Act, and the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (2011). All archaeological consultng actvites were performed under the Professional Archaeological License of Luke Dalla Bona (P065).

The subject property is located on the Canadian Shield (Secton 1.3.3, Standard 1).

As a result of the Stage 1 archaeological assessment at Litle Bark Lake, archaeology potental was determined to exist. It is recommended that Stage 2 archaeological assessment take place in those areas identfed as having archaeological potental as shown on Figure 8 in this report.

Due to the fact that a site inspecton did not occur, determinaton of archaeological potental was conservatve.

Luke Dalla Bona, M.A. Partner Woodland Heritage Services Limited 308 Queen Street E Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 1Z1 Licence Holder (P065)

Licensee Informaton: Luke Dalla Bona Woodland Heritage Services Limited 308 Queen Street E Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 1Z1 Telephone: 705-256-5418 E-Mail: [email protected] Province of Ontario, Licence to Conduct Consultng Archaeology P065 (Woodland Heritage Services Limited)

Project Informaton: Stage 1, Litle Bark Lake PIF # P065-0255-2016

Proponent Informaton: Mr. Neil Enright Natonal Fur Farms Inc 118 Annie Mayhew Road Combermere,Ontario K0J 1L0 p: 480 363 6558 e: [email protected]

Development context

The proponent is planning to sub-divide the property.

The subject property is located on the Canadian Shield (Secton 1.3.3, Standard 1).

All records pertaining to this project area currently housed in the corporate ofce of Woodland Heritage Services, Limited in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

Historical context

Record Review Site fles at the ofces of the Archaeological Data Coordinator Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS) and Woodland Heritage Services Limited site fles were checked to determine if any prehistoric sites had been previously recorded and registered either in or near the study area.

Cultural Prehistory People have been living in the study area since the tme glaciers receded and the land could support plants and animals. Archaeologists have divided the precontact era (that is, before the tme of European arrival) into tme periods, described briefy below.

Paleo-Indian Period (ca. 10,000 - 7,000 B.P. [before present tme]) These precontact peoples were the frst inhabitants of the area. Most likely, they arrived by following herds of caribou across the tundra/parkland environment of newly opened lands lef by the retreatng glaciers. Within a few hundred years, the Boreal forest moved in, causing an adaptaton to a forest environment and setlement concentratons along lakes and river systems. Several types of early spear points indicate that diferent groups of these early hunters moved in at various tmes. In the Thunder Bay region, Paleo-Indian sites are commonly associated with the glacial Lake Minong shoreline.

However, because of the later retreat of the glaciers in the northern part of the province and subsequent fooding of the glacially-compressed landscape by pre and post glacial lakes, there Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /2 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. was a tme delay in the setlement of northern regions by colonizing vegetaton, animals and humans. It appears that people may have entered the eastern Lake Superior/northern Lake Huron area about 9,000 years ago, while archaeological work farther north in the Hudson’s Bay Lowlands suggests that human occupaton there may be limited to about the last 6,000 years.

Archaic Period (ca. 7,000 B.P. - 2,500 B.P.) An environmental transiton brought about warmer, drier conditons resultng in a change in the plant and animal communites, which consequently impacted the subsistence paterns of humans living in the region now represented by north-central Ontario. These alteratons of subsistence paterns are refected in the artfact assemblages. For instance, in response to the huntng of smaller game, large spear points were replaced by smaller, notched projectle points and stone knives generally became smaller. A new technology involving the producton of stone tools by grinding rather than chipping was also utlized.

About 5,000 B.P., people started to make use of copper, which was cold-hammered to form spear points, knives, gaf hooks and elaborate jewelry. One of the most complete copper assemblages for northwestern Ontario comes from a burial south of Lake Nipigon, datng to about 3,500 B.P.

Inital Woodland Period (ca. 2,500 B.P. - 1,100 B.P.) The Inital Woodland Period marks the frst appearance of ceramics in the archaeological record, a technological development which becomes increasingly important to the archaeologist as a means of determining the age and occupaton of a site. Just as projectle points in the preceding Archaic and Paleo stages underwent stylistc alteratons through tme, which permited the determinaton of the age of a site, ceramics also refect changes: in vessel form, method of constructon, decoratve motf (design) and mode of decoraton (method). The evoluton of ceramic constructon was gradual and subtle enough to allow archaeologists to determine the placement of a site within a cultural chronology on the basis of the ceramics recovered from it.

Archaeologists refer to the frst potery-using period in northern Ontario as the Laurel Traditon. Laurel peoples sites are marked by the introducton of fred clay potery vessels. These vessels were made by the coil method, had conical bases and were smooth, with the excepton of the neck and rim which were decorated with distnctve toothed or sinuous-edged tools. The Laurel peoples also practsed a way of life similar to the Archaic peoples who lived in the region before them: fshing, huntng and collectng wild plants on the major waterways.

There are two major theories concerning the origin of the Laurel culture. One is that it arose out of an Archaic base, difering only by the adopton of potery. The other is that the people moved into the region following the expansion of wild rice habitats about 2500 B.P.

Terminal Woodland (ca. 1,100 B.P. - 400 B.P.) Two distnctve cultures, both of which appear to have developed from a Laurel cultural base, are present in the Terminal Woodland Period. One of these cultures is referred to as the Blackduck traditon; the other distnct culture is the Selkirk traditon.

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /3 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. The Blackduck culture is characterized by unique globular potery vessels. The body of these vessels is textured by cord-wrapped paddles and the rim is decorated with cord-wrapped object impression. Some archaeologists believe the Blackduck traditon was ancestral to the modern Ojibway (Anishnabek) Aboriginal Peoples and First Natons.

The other Terminal Woodland culture, the Selkirk traditon, is distnguished by their fabric- impressed globular vessels. They are found farther north. According to many archaeologists, the Selkirk peoples are ancestral to the Cree Aboriginal Peoples and First Natons.

Historic Period (ca. 400 B.P. to present) This period begins with the arrival of Europeans and setlers to the area, specifcally French, then English traders, bringing with them trade goods such as axes, guns, beads and metal products.

The following history of the Barry’s Bay area is excerpted from Barry’s Bay, The Centre Of The Madawaska Valley by Angela Lorbetskie (1983).

In 1857, in order to encourage setlement of the region of the County of Renfrew, the Otawa and Opeongo Roads, the Addington Road, and the Hastngs Roads were built. “The constructon of the frst of these roads started in 1854. It ran roughly westward along the Bonnechere River and Madawaska River to the Great Opeongo Lake. On completon, it extended 100 miles inland from the Otawa River.” (Makowsk, 1967). The frst men who worked on the road constructon were ofered 100-200 acres of land for setlement and thus, the Opeongo Road was a catalyst for the arrival of immigrants heading towards the forests of the Madawaska Valley in 1860.

By the end of the 19th century, immigrants had setled in Siberia; in Sherwood, Jones & Burns Townships; in and around Lake Kamaniskeg and what is now known as Barry’s Bay. These setlers were predominantly of Polish and Irish extracton. The employment brought about by the major road constructon, in additon to the land grants, and the concurrent lumber boom were the primary reasons for setlement in this porton of the Otawa Valley. In a report dated June 23, 1862, Provincial Land Surveyor A.J. Forrest recommended the head of Barry’s Bay as an eligible site for a town plot statng that the proposed site could be approached by the Opeongo Road and was well toward the centre of the Township of Sherwood. It also had the advantage of water communicaton with the country on the south side of the Madawaska River.

McLaughlin’s Lumber Company had its lumbering operatons in progress for some years and ‘a depot for that company had been erected within the area now within the village. A stage coach depot and a post ofce which was used a lot by lumbermen writng leters to their families were situated at Cuthbertson’s Inn on Bark Lake six miles west of Barry’s Bay. Later this post ofce was moved to Kavolski’s farm and then again to Barry’s Bay.

In 1879 the frst hotel (also the frst established permanent dwelling) was built in the with the modern limits of the Village of Barry’s Bay. This hotel (the Blueberry Hotel) served as a stopover for travelers, lumbermen and setlers. It was later named the Windsor and served spirits untl 1916 when prohibiton came into force. The Hotel converted to a restaurant and apartment house. The Blueberry Hotel, owned by James Drohan, was the nucleus for the village setlement.

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /4 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. Untl the 1920s, the main means of employment was farming, lumbering and some mining at the Craigmont mines. During this tme transportaton consisted of the railroad, stage coach, horses, and the Mayfower steamer which provided a seasonal daily communicaton link, mail and passenger and freight service between Barry’s Bay and Combermere.

In 1888, at the tme when the frst school in the district was founded at Siberia Forks, the J.R. Booth Lumber Company of Otawa incorporated the Otawa-Arnprior and Parry Sound Railroad Company, (this was later sold to Grand Trunk in 1905). In 1894 the arrival of the railway train was a major milestone in the history of the area. It almost immediately replaced the Opeongo Line stage coach and the telegraph service and it stretched from its origin in the east to Arnprior and Golden Lake to Barry’s Bay and Madawaska. Barry’s Bay became a supply depot and a site for a sawmill. During the 1890s, the tmber industry underwent changes and Booth sold out to smaller companies.

The coming of the railroad had a great infuence on the development of the area since the new services gave it economic stability and the founding more business establishments. 1893 saw the frst general store in Barry’s Bay. A second hotel was built but was destroyed in 1899 by fre and rebuilt. It is now called the Balmoral Hotel. The post ofce was located in this hotel for a tme untl it was moved to a new locaton on Opeongo Line in 1936. A blacksmith shop was also located opposite Drohan’s Hotel to shoe the many horses which were used by farmers and lumbermen alike. In 1895 County Council designated Barry’s Bay for a town site.

1896 saw the founding of the frst mission church for Barry’s Bay; the Church of the Assumpton of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 2 miles southwest of the village. In the following year the St. Lawrence O’Toole chapel was constructed. In 1914, when the congregaton increased in size, St. Hedwig’s Church was constructed on the north shore of Kamaniskeg Lake and the St. Lawrence O’Toole Church was built in 1907.

Two schools within the village were also in existence by this tme: a school built in 1902 and the St. Joseph’s separate school which was built in 1928.

In 1905, Barry’s Bay was an actve community. Approximately twenty daily trains passed through carrying passengers and lumber. Just three years before, Mick and Tom Murray had formed M & T Murray Lumber and received their frst tmber limit. J.R. Booth, an Otawa Valley lumberman, had been restructuring his operatons out of the valley since the 1890s due to the fact that the big stands of pine had almost all disappeared and the square tmber trade was dwindling. A smaller, more localized lumber industry sprung up. M & T Lumber had their logs sawed at Martn’s sawmill on Cybulskie’s Pond. In 1911 they went into partnership with J. Omanique and by the winter of 1914 were employing about 150 men. This partnership lasted untl 1929 and the following year saw the beginning of the Murray Brothers Lumber Company as we know it today. A mill was erected at Cross Lake and business was carried out there untl 1952 when they built a sawmill at Madawaska and an ofce in Barry’s Bay. This company is now one of the largest employers in the area and their planer is situated in Barry’s Bay. The lumber industry which played such an

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /5 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. important part in the development of the village in the early part of the twenteth century, stll plays a vital role in the economic situaton of Barry’s Bay and the surrounding area.

In 1912, the area lost an important link in the chain of communicaton and transport between Barry’s Bay and Combermere. The Mayfower, a sternwheeler which had been carrying mail, passengers and freight sank in Lake Kamaniskeg taking all lives on board with the excepton of three people who survived. However, within the following ten years, road services had improved. By the tme the Dominion Government had purchased and merged the Grand Trunk and the Canadian Atlantc Railway into the Canadian Natonal Railway, the improved roads and the depleton of the tmber resources were steadily contributng to the decline of rail service. The divisional headquarters had been dismantled at Madawaska and the engine house and turning facilites had been constructed at Barry’s Bay. The railway staton (now owned by the village and used by the Opeongo Trailblazer’s Senior Citzen’s Club) stll stands in Barry’s Bay as does the water tower, possibly the only remaining wooden water tank in Eastern Canada or in all Canada.

The telegraph ofce ceased operatons in the area in 1894 but it wasn’t too long before the People’s Telephone Service installed a switchboard at the post ofce operated by W. Kerwin in the building where Donna Chapeskie’s gif shop is now located. In 1922, a small group of citzens purchased this service and installed a switchboard at Skebo’s store where it was called the Sherwood Municipal Telephone Company, later the Madawaska Valley Telephone System. In 1958 it became part of Bell Telephone and moved to its new locaton where the Barry’s Bay Public Library stands today. Hydro was also introduced in the area in the 1920s and 1930s.

With respect to the subject property, a ttle search indicates that the original patent was granted on December 14, 1928. A transfer easement was registered on April 30, 1942. The current owners registered their ttle to the land on August 14, 2015.

Archaeological context

Known/registered Archaeological sites The registered site database maintained by the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS) was queried for informaton about sites on and near the study area. There are no registered archaeological sites within two kilometres of the subject property.

Conditon of the Property The subject property is located at Broken Lt 18 Con 6 Jones; Broken Lt 19 Con 6 Jones; Lt 20 Con 6 Jones Except Pts 1 & 2, 49R11289 ; S/T Jo206, Municipality Of The Township Of Madawaska Valley in Renfrew County.

The property is located within the Canadian Shield and the surrounding vegetaton is a Great- Lakes St. Lawrence overstory. The terrain is rolling, exposed bedrock knob, with moderate relief. The property gently slopes downward to the north to an arm of Bark Lake. There is a small seasonal creek that fows northeast from into Bark Lake. This creek drains Norwalk Lake and does not appear to be navigable (from aerial photography there is no break in the trees) but regardless

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /6 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. of this, it does not lead to/from anywhere. Bark Lake/Madawaska River system is the primary drainage in this area.

It is important to note that Bark Lake is an artfcially raised water body that was dammed in 1942. The original Survey of the Township of Jones (1862) illustrates Scot’s Lake and Bark Lake to be 2 separate and distnct water bodies connected only by a creek. Scot’s Lake was illustrated to be located approximately 1 mile east of Bark Lake. The Bark Lake Dam was constructed in 1942, resultng in extensive fooding - raising the water levels into the creek and joining permanently joining Scot’s Lake with Bark Lake. The original survey lines are stll apparent on modern assessment maps indicatng where the original shorelines were.

There is no urban, residental, commercial or industrial development on this property. Apart from recreatonal use, the property is in a more-or-less natural state.

Dates of Fieldwork No property inspecton was conducted at this property.

Previous Archaeological Fieldwork No previous feldwork is known to have been carried out within this project boundary.

Previous Findings & Recommendatons n/a

Unusual Physical Features Afectng Fieldwork Strategy Decisions n/a

Field Methods Project plans were provided by the proponent. The Stage 1 assessment determined whether there are any undisturbed portons of the property and/or whether the property contains areas of archaeological potental.

Analysis and Conclusions There are no features normally associated with archaeological potental occurring within the project area (glacial beach lines, eskers etc).

There are no topographic features (escarpments, topographic highs) normally associated with archaeological potental occurring on the property.

The property is in a natural state with no residental, commercial or industrial disturbances. There is no doubt that logging has occurred on the property during the past 150 years signifcantly altering the standing vegetaton. This logging has created impacts to the mineral soils but there has been no signifcant removal or impacts to the mineral soil that would have removed/destroyed any potental archaeological sites.

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /7 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. The primary disturbance to the property afectng archaeological potental is the raising of Bark Lake in 1942. Prior to 1942, the northern boundary of the property was defned by Scot’s Lake - a small shallow lake connected to Bark Lake (to the west) by a small creek. The raising of Bark Lake resulted in water fowing into this ‘arm’ of Bark Lake, fooding Scot’s Lake and creatng one seamless waterbody.

Thus the original shoreline of the subject property is now fooded although, some portons of the property remain with 50m of the original shoreline of Scot’s Lake.

There are no registered archaeological sites on or within 2km of the subject property. There are no other natural or cultural features on the subject property associated with archaeological sites.

This property is located within northern Ontario as defned by MTCS and no property inspecton was carried out. Therefore, the evaluaton of archaeological potental must be conservatve. MTCS guidelines indicate that areas of undisturbed land within 50m of a signifcant water body should be considered to have archaeology potental. From a conservatve perspectve, Scot’s Lake (pre-1942 fooding boundaries) should be considered to be a signifcant water body. It was connected to Bark Lake by a creek that was likely navigable during most of the ice-free year.

Areas within 75m of the original boundaries of Scot’s Lake that are above the modern shoreline of Bark Lake should be subjected to Stage 2 archaeological assessment. This is a conservatve measure as the levels of Bark Lake vary throughout the year. recoMMenDAtIons As a result of the Stage 1 archaeological assessment at Litle Bark Lake, archaeology potental was determined to exist. It is recommended that Stage 2 archaeological assessment take place in those areas identfed as having archaeological potental as shown on Figure 8 in this report.

Due to the fact that a site inspecton did not occur, determinaton of archaeological potental was conservatve.

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /8 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. ADvIce on coMPlIAnce wItH legIslAtIon This report is submited to the Minister of Tourism and Culture as a conditon of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18. The report is reviewed to ensure that it complies with the standards and guidelines that are issued by the Minister, and that the archaeological feldwork and report recommendatons ensure the conservaton, protecton and preservaton of the cultural heritage of Ontario. When all maters relatng to archaeological sites within the project area of a development proposal have been addressed to the satsfacton of the Ministry of Tourism and Culture, a leter will be issued by the ministry statng that there are no further concerns with regard to alteratons to archaeological sites by the proposed development.

It is an ofence under Sectons 48 and 69 of the Ontario Heritage Act for any party other than a licensed archaeologist to make any alteraton to a known archaeological site or to remove any artfact or other physical evidence of past human use or actvity from the site, untl such tme as a licensed archaeologist has completed archaeological feldwork on the site, submited a report to the Minister statng that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest , and the report has been fled in the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports referred to in Secton 65.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Should previously undocumented archaeological resources be discovered, they may be a new archaeological site and therefore subject to Secton 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteraton of the site immediately and engage a licensed consultant archaeologist to carry out archaeological feldwork, in compliance with Secton 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

The Cemeteries Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. C.4 and the Funeral, Burial and Crematon Services Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.33 (when proclaimed in force) require that any person discovering human remains must notfy the police or coroner and the Registrar of Cemeteries at the Ministry of Consumer Services.

Archaeological sites recommended for further archaeological feldwork or protecton remain subject to Secton 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act and may not be altered, or have artfacts removed from them, except by a person holding an archaeological licence.”

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /9 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. reFerences cIteD Lorbetskie, Angela 1983 Barry’s Bay, The Centre Of The Madawaska Valley. Barry’s Bay Public Library, Barry’s Bay, Ontario.

Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists. Toronto: Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport.

Figure 1. Locaton of the Litle Bark Lake study area, Renfrew County, Ontario. PRINTED ON 09 DEC, 2015 AT 11:59:14 ± FOR PETER001 SCALE 0 120 240 360 480 meters

PROPERTY INDEX MAP RENFREW(No. 49)

LEGEND

FREEHOLD PROPERTY LEASEHOLD PROPERTY LIMITED INTEREST PROPERTY CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY RETIRED PIN (MAP UPDATE PENDING) PROPERTY NUMBER 0449 BLOCK NUMBER 08050 GEOGRAPHIC FABRIC EASEMENT

THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY

NOTES

REVIEW THE TITLE RECORDS FOR COMPLETE PROPERTY INFORMATION AS THIS MAP MAY NOT REFLECT RECENT REGISTRATIONS

THIS MAP WAS COMPILED FROM PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RECORDED IN THE LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM AND HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR PROPERTY INDEXING PURPOSES ONLY

FOR DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTIES BOUNDARIES SEE RECORDED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS

ONLY MAJOR EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN

REFERENCE PLANS UNDERLYING MORE RECENT REFERENCE PLANS ARE NOT ILLUSTRATED

Figure 2. Property index map for the subject property at Litle Bark Lake.. Pecors Lake Notes: Little Bark Lake Locality

Legend

0 0.6 km Projection: Web Mercator

The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry shall not be liable in any way for Imagery Copyright Notices: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; NASA Landsat the use of, or reliance upon, this map or any information on this map. This map should Program; First Base Solutions Inc.; Aéro-Photo (1961) Inc.; DigitalGlobe Inc.; U.S. Geological not be used for: navigation, a plan of survey, routes, nor locations. Survey. © Copyright for Ontario Parcel data is held by Queen’s Printer for Ontario and its licensors and may © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2015 not be reproduced without permission.

Figure 3. 1:8000 scale topographic map of the Litle Bark Lake study area, Renfrew County, Ontario. Notes: Little Bark Lake Locality

Legend

0 0.6 km Projection: Web Mercator

Figure 4. 1:8000 scale aerial photography of the Litle Bark Lake study area, Renfrew County, Ontario. Figure 5. Original 1862 survey map of Jones Township. Litle Bark Lake is highlighted in red.

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment, Mun. of Township of Madawaska Valley, Renfrew County. /15 © 2016 Woodland Heritage Services Limited. All Rights Reserved. ¯ Legend Future Subdivision Back Lot Street Bark Lake Watercourse Lakes Future 6 50 Subdivision m (10.3 ha)

Babinski Road m 1 .

4 S tr 1 e ee 6 t rs " u A" co er at Back Lot W (16.2 ha)

m Vacant Woodlands 8 1

Vacant Woodlands 3

Street "A"

542.2 m 20 m Vacant Woodlands

Map Layers Obtained from LIO

0 2040 80 120 160 200 Meters Little Bark Bay Site Plan 1:5,000 Date: February 16, 2016 Project No. 2157602A

Figure 6. Proponent’s proposed development map for the subject property. Pecors Lake DWG NAME: P:\DRAWINGS\7 - PLANNING & LAND DEVELOPMENT\2157602A LITTLE BARK LAKE\7602A_SITEPLAN 12 LOT REVISION.DWG

THE POSITION OF POLE LINES, CONDUITS, WATERMAINS, SEWERS AND OTHER UNDERGROUND AND OVERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWING, AND, WHERE SHOWN, THE ACCURACY OF THE POSITION OF SUCH UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IS NOT GUARANTEED. BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INFORM THEMSELVES OF THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SUCH UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES, AND SHALL ASSUME ALL LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO THEM. LAYOUT: C1

30.0m WATER SETBACK SAVED ON 15.0m WATER SETBACK Wednesday, February 17, 2016

30.0m 30.0m WATER SETBACK BY MARIELLEM

30.0m

No. DATE ENG/DRFT REVISION COMMENTS MARIELLEM BY Wednesday, February 17, 2016 SAVED ON C1 LITTLE BARK LAKE LAYOUT: LOCATION, ONTARIO ~ SITE PLAN

Jp2g Consultants Inc. ENGINEERS ▪ PLANNERS ▪ PROJECT MANAGERS

12 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE, PEMBROKE, ON Phone: (613)735-2507, Fax:(613)735-4513

1150 MORRISON DRIVE, SUITE 410, OTTAWA, ON Phone: (613)828-7800, Fax: (613)828-2600

DESIGNED: BW PROJECT No.: 2157602A

DRAFTED: MJM REVISION DATE:

CHECKED: BW APPROVED: SGW REVISION No.: . SCALE: 1:1000

P:\DRAWINGS\7 - PLANNING & LAND DEVELOPMENT\2157602A LITTLE BARK LAKE\7602A_SITEPLAN 12 LOT REVISION.DWG C-1

7602A_SITEPLAN 12 LOT REVISION.DWG DWG NAME:

Figure 7. Development map showing the original road allowance around Scot’s Lake and fooded lands between the original Scot’s Lake shoreline and the current shoreline of Litle Bark Lake/Bark Lake. Archaeology Potental due to proximity ¯ to original lake shoreline Legend Future Subdivision Back Lot Street Bark Lake Watercourse Lakes Future Archaeology Potental 65 Subdivision 0 m (10.3 ha) No Archaeology Potental

Babinski Road m 1 .

4 S tr 1 e ee 6 t rs " u A" No archaeology potental co er at Back Lot due to distance from W (16.2 ha) original water source,

m lackVac ofan tlandscapeWoodlands 8

1 features associated with Vacant Woodlands 3 archaeological sites.

Street "A"

542.2 m 20 m Vacant Woodlands

Map Layers Obtained from LIO

0 2040 80 120 160 200 Meters Little Bark Bay Site Plan 1:5,000 Date: February 16, 2016 Project No. 2157602A Figure 8. Areas of archaeology potental that require Stage 2 archaeological assessment.