DOCSLIB.ORG

Questions Without Notice Friday,2 November

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Questions Without Notice Friday,2 November Questions without Notice 2 November 1984 ASSEMBLY 1781 Friday,2 November 1984 COSTIGAN ROYAL COMMISSION REPORT The SPEAKER (the Hon. C. T. Edmunds) Mr ROSS-EDWARDS (Leader of the took the chair at 10.35 a.m. and read the National Party)-I refer the Premier to the prayer. many recommendations made by Mr Cos­ tigan in his report regarding legislative changes, which are necessary and urgent, QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE and the fact that ready acceptance of those recommendations was reached in principle by the Premier. In the light of those recom­ FEDERAL GOVERNMENT mendations, will the Premier give further PAMPHLET ON SCHOOLS consideration to this Parliament meeting in Mr JONA (Hawthorn)-On my last day's the first fortnight of December to bring sitting in Parliament, I raise with the Min­ about these legislative changes. I refer him ister of Education the 2015th issue I have to four particular areas where the need is raised in this Parliament, over the past 21 obvious: The Lotteries Gaming and Betting years. I ask the Minister whether he is aware Act, the Crimes Act, the Building Societies that the Federal Government pamphlet Act and the Bail Act. entitled "Improving Australian Schools" has Mr CAIN (Premier)-The Government been banned by the Western Australian responded quickly to the recommendations Labor Government for distribution within that were made. As I recollect, some 24 of Government schools in that State on the those recommendations affected Victoria ground that it is mere Federal election solely or in part, and the Government made propaganda, and that there have been moves decisions in respect of some eighteen of to ban the distribution of that booklet in them. As for the remainder of the recom­ other States. Will the Minister ban this mendations, consultation will take place. I highly political and offensive document am not prepared to reconsider the decision from distribution to Government schools that was made in regard to the sitting of this within Victoria? Parliament. I would not believe, even in Mr FORDHAM (Minister of Educa­ those areas where a decision has been made tion)-I thank the honourable member for by the Government with regard to the what I expect to be his final question after recommendations, that the consideration many, many years of service to the Vic­ and consultation as to the detail could prop­ erly be given within the time frame sug­ torian Parliament. I wish him well in his gested by the Leader of the National Party. retirement. I am sure his decision was a wise one. In relation to the matter the The matters dealt with in the recommen­ honourable member raises, I am not famil­ dations are complex in almost all regards. iar with the pamphlet to which he refers, or, The only one which I could say would indeed, with any decision being made by require a simplistic approach is in the area the Western Australian Government. of the penalties for starting-price bookmak­ ing offences. That is the only area in which However, I am conscious of the efforts there could be a seat-of-the-pants judgment being made by Governments throughout should the maximum fine be $5000 or Australia to keep very much in touch with $25 000. As for the remainder of the mat­ their communities to ensure that people are ters, they require proper consultation with aware and informed of initiatives and atti­ the agencies concerned. tudes of Governments so that they are bet­ ter informed when making judgments about Having heard numerous complaints from the present and future. I have no doubt that the opposition parties about supposed lack the document to which the honourable of consultation, if the Government were to member refers, as prepared by the Com­ do what is suggested, the opposition parties monwealth Government, is in that line. would complain about lack of time to con­ However, I shall examine the matter and, if sider the issues involved. I do not intend to there are any difficulties, I shall inform the rush into these matters. honourable member further. Mr Ross-Edwards-Do nothing! 1782 ASSEMBLY 2 November 1984 Questions without Notice Mr CAIN-That is not a fair comment there shortly. This is good news for all Vic­ the Government has moved Quickly to put torians and it is good news for the people at in place a whole range of recommendations Portland. It emphasizes that the Govern­ that have been made already. It has acted ment's policy of moderation, conciliation, Quickly on prosecutions. There have been and following the processes, ensured that a ongoing prosecutions with spectacular suc­ successful conclusion was reached. cess. The Government has acted Quickly to indicate its response to the various and con­ HOSPITALS siderable recommendations that have been Mr LIEBERMAN (Benambra)-In view made. of the deepening industrial crisis in Vic­ toria's public hospitals, including the cur­ EMPLOYMENT rent strike at the Alfred Hospital, bans at Mr MILLER (Prahran)-The Premier other hospitals, a stopwork meeting being has shown himself to be the most outstand­ held this morning at the Royal Women's ing Premier in the history of the State. In Hospital, and the fact that the Premier view of the significant increases in employ­ intends closing down Parliament now, will ment in Victoria recently, will the Premier the Premier detail measures that the Gov­ inform the House of additional steps that ernment proposes to take to restore hospital have been taken to further improve patient services? employment in the State? Specifically, will he proclaim Victorian Mr CAIN (Premier)-I am very pleased hospitals as essential services under the to be able to say, at the end of the sitting of Act if there is nota total return to work by Parliament, that the Government has in its 2 p.m. today? first term Quite successfully turned the Mr CAIN (Premier)-The last day of the economy around from what it was when it session really is desperation day! Honour­ came to office. I acknowledge that the reces­ able members saw that last night when a sion did not bottom out until April 1983 or motion of want of confidence in the Gov­ thereabouts and, since that time, the Gov­ ernment was moved. The Government's life ernment has created 100 500 new jobs. The was on the line. Three Opposition speakers trend appears to be continuing. spoke, and the Opposition ran away from Money has been set aside in the Budget the motion! That is how seriously the specifically to create new jobs in the State. Opposition takes the Government of this State! Last night's performance was the most It is important that there are good signs of disgraceful performance in the history of expansion occurring throughout the private this State. For the Leader of the Opposition sector. The Government has a very impres­ to move a want of confidence motion and sive record on economic achievement. If walk away from it after two and half or members of the Opposition look out their three hours is nothing short of disgraceful. windows they will see the cranes now springing up around the skyline. Not a word that has been said by the Opposition would lead me to believe the l\tlr Kennett-Where? industrial record of the present Govern­ Mr CAIN-A whole range of projects is ment does not distinguish the present Gov­ under way, or approved to be under way. ernment above all its predecessors. The The record of building approvals over the honourable member should well know that past six months in the central business dis- the matter he raises is in hand. It is under trict alone speaks for itself. - consideration by the two Ministers con­ The most significant of those projects cerned-the Minister for Industrial Affairs singly is the Alcoa aluminium smelter at and the Minister of Health. The honourable Portland. I was pleased to learn that this member should also know that the Govern­ morning the Full Bench of the Conciliation ment has the track record in the resolution and Arbitration Commission handed down of industrial disputes. its decision on demarcation of the work for I ask honourable members to consider the smelter. The joint venturers are confi­ just one set of figures-the Government's dent that decision will be accepted without record as compared with that of the pre­ problems and that work will recommence vious Government, and the number of days Questions without Notice 2 November 1984 ASSEMBLY 1783 lost in the present Government's term of COMMONWEALTH-STATE office as compared with the days lost under FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS the former Government. I am confident that Mr ROWE (Essendon)-My question any industrial dispute in this State can and without notice is directed to the most out­ will be resolved in accordance with the standing Treasurer of this State. Can he practices followed by the Government. inform the House what progress is being made in improvin~ Commonwealth-State PROMOTION CAMPAIGN OF ROAD financial relationshIps? CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY Mr JOLLY (Treasurer)-I thank the Mr HANN (Rodney)-Can the Minister honourable member for his question. He of Transport advise the House who author­ takes an active interest in economic matters ized the television promotion campaign by and is an asset to the Government. As honourable members are aware, Victoria has the Road Construction Authority? long been discriminated against in tax-shar­ Honourable members interjecting. ing arran~ements, as has been recognized The SPEAKER-Order! The House will by both LIberal and Labor Governments in come to order. I ask the honourable mem­ this State.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-Cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Case 2:17-Cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 194
    Case 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 194 1 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California 2 TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON, State Bar No. 207650 JOHN D. ECHEVERRIA, State Bar No. 268843 4 Deputy Attorneys General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 5 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5509 6 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 WILLIAM WIESE, et al., 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN 14 Plaintiff, EXHIBITS 7 THROUGH 17 TO THE DECLARATION OF ALEXANDRA 15 v. ROBERT GORDON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 16 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER XAVIER BECERRA, et al., AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 17 Defendant. Date: June 16, 2017 18 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 5 19 Judge: The Honorable William B. Shubb Action Filed: April 28, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Case 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 194 Exhibit 7 Gordon Declaration 00351 __ Case 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 3 of 194 SENIOR PARTNER OF COUNSEL C. D, MICHEL* MA1-THEW M. HORECZKO LOS ANGELES, CA MANAGING PARTNER JOSHUA ROBERT DALE A I SPECIAL COUNSEL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Privatisation in Au Stralia
    The University of Sydney sydney.edu.au Associate Professor Prison Privatisation Jane Andrew, Dr Max Baker and in Australia: Dr Philip Roberts The State of the Nation 2016 Prison Privatisation in Australia: The State of the Nation Accountability, Costs, Performance and Efficiency Associate Professor Jane Andrew, Dr Max Baker and Dr Philip Roberts Contents Background 1 Purpose 2 Part 1: Prison Privatisation: The State of the Nation Findings 4 Limitations 5 Challenges for the Future 5 Part 2: Prison Privatisation: State-by-State Private Prisons in Queensland 8 Private Prisons in New South Wales 20 Private Prisons in South Australia 31 Private Prisons in Victoria 38 Private Prisons in Western Australia 49 Bibliography 60 Biographies 69 The project was partly funded by an industry partnership grant between The University of Sydney Business School and the Western Australian Prison Officers Union (WAPOU). The researchers independently determined the research design and analysis associated with this project. Neither funding body has had any influence on the findings of this report. Contact Associate Professor Jane Andrew [email protected] +61 2 90366277 Dr Max Baker [email protected] +61 2 90367084 Background Australia now imprisons more people than at any point in its history. As of June 2015, 36,134 people were incarcerated across eight states, and the national imprisonment rate stood at 196 prisoners per 100,000 people (ABS, 2015: Table 2). The total annual net cost of Australia’s prison system stands at $3.4 billion (Productivity Commission, 2014: Table 8A.12). As a result of the growth in prisoner numbers and a variety of pressures on the sector, state governments continue to look for new ways to deliver prison services that are thought to be both socially and fiscally responsible, including various forms of privatisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report on Trends in Police Corruption
    COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 Parliament House Macquarie Street Sydney 2000 Tel: (02) 9230 2737 Fax: (02) 9230 3309 ISBN 0 7347 6899 0 Table Of Contents COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP .........................................................................................................i CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD..........................................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE – A TYPOLOGY OF POLICE CORRUPTION........................................................ 3 1.1 A BRIEF REVIEW OF POLICING AND ETHICS LITERATURE.............................................................. 3 1.2 DEFINING POLICE CORRUPTION.............................................................................................. 6 1.3 ROTTEN APPLE VS ROTTEN BARREL ...................................................................................... 10 1.4 CYCLES OF CORRUPTION.................................................................................................... 12 1.5 CORRUPTION – AN ETHICAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEM?....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes from the Structural Trasnformation of the Public Sphere
    Communicating Courts: an Analysis of the Changing Interface Between the Courts and the Media Author Johnston, Jane Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Arts, Media and Culture DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3332 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367566 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Communicating courts: an analysis of the changing interface between the courts and the media Submitted by Jane Louise Johnston B Bus (Comm) MA School of Arts, Media and Culture Faculty of Arts Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2004 Abstract This research investigates the changing relationship between the courts and the news media in Australia. While providing a broad historical context for this relationship, it focuses specifically on the past decade and the significant changes in communications practice within many Australian court jurisdictions. The study critically examines the role of public information officers (PIOs) in the Australian court system from 1993. It also investigates debates around experimentation with television cameras in Australian courts. It further critically examines other initiatives, undertaken by the courts through the PIO, including the development of court-media liaison committees, judgment summaries, websites and standardised request forms. This investigation brings together a range of perspectives about the court-media relationship. The findings are based on responses from 32 semi-structured interviews, conducted across seven jurisdictions in Australia over 28 months. Those interviewed include judges, PIOs, television reporters, news directors and newspaper reporters.
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia Juvenile Justice and Criminal Justice Research on Conferencing and Sentencing
    SAJJ-CJ South Australia Juvenile Justice and Criminal Justice Research on Conferencing and Sentencing Technical Report No. 3 3rd Edition Sexual Assault Archival Study (SAAS): An Archival Study of Sexual Offence Cases Disposed in Youth Court and by Conference and Formal Caution in South Australia by Kathleen Daly, Project Director Brigitte Bouhours Sarah Curtis-Fawley with the assistance of Leanne Weber Rita Scholl Revised, Expanded, and Updated July 2007 1 SAJJ-CJ Technical Report No. 3, 3rd Edition Preface to the Third Edition This third edition of Technical Report No. 3 updates the second edition published in September 2005 (Daly et al. 2005). It describes studies that has been carried out and completed since the second edition and gives up to date citations to recently published papers. Unlike the second edition, this edition does not introduce new results. In December 2003, we published the first edition of Technical Report No. 3 (Daly et al. 2003a), which described the materials gathered and how they were coded, and presented selected results from the Sexual Assault Archival Study (SAAS) in the Final Report (Daly et al. 2003b). During 2004, after further cleaning of the data, the dataset was revised. The revisions were prompted by an analysis of sentencing remarks for 55 finalised, judge-sentenced court cases. The remarks revealed some inaccuracies in the data we had received from the South Australia Justice Data Warehouse for cases that went to trial, and they filled some gaps in the court’s Certificates of Record and the Police Apprehension Reports. The changes made to the dataset had a negligible effect on the results presented in early publications (Daly 2005a; Daly and Curtis-Fawley 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • 17-56081, 10/12/2017, ID: 10616291, Dktentry: 13-4, Page 1 of 285
    Case: 17-56081, 10/12/2017, ID: 10616291, DktEntry: 13-4, Page 1 of 285 17-56081 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN, et al, Plaintiff and Appellees, v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendant and Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California No. 17-cv-1017-BEN-JLB The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, Judge APPELLANT’S EXCERPTS OF RECORD, VOLUME IV, ER 0650-0921 XAVIER BECERRA ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON Attorney General of California Deputy Attorney General THOMAS S. PATTERSON State Bar No. 207650 Senior Assistant Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 TAMAR PACHTER San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Supervising Deputy Attorney Telephone: (415) 703-5509 General Fax: (415) 703-5480 NELSON R. RICHARDS Email: ANTHONY P. O’BRIEN [email protected] Deputy Attorneys General Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Case: 17-56081, 10/12/2017, ID: 10616291, DktEntry: 13-4, Page 2 of 285 TABLE OF CONTENTS Date Page VOLUME I 6/29/17 Order Granting Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 28) ER0001 7/27/17 Notice of Appeal (Docket No. 32) ER0067 6/13/17 Reporter’s Transcript of Proceedings (Hearing on Motion for ER0069 Preliminary Injunction) 6/12/17 Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s Answer (Docket No. 25) ER0134 5/26/17 Order Granting Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening ER0148 Time (Docket No. 5) 5/25/17 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time ER0150 to Hear Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting Costs and Reducing Reoffending Redesigning Private Prison Contracts for Better Results
    September 2019 CUTTING COSTS AND REDUCING REOFFENDING REDESIGNING PRIVATE PRISON CONTRACTS FOR BETTER RESULTS Institute of Public Aairs CRIMINALJUSTICE Project Andrew Bushnell, Research Fellow Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction 6 1. Key facts: private prisons in Australia 8 2. Incentive design 14 3. Competition 20 4. The case for the reform 26 Conclusion 32 References 33 2 Institute of Public Affairs www.ipa.org.au Executive summary Key messages Criminal justice reform is about making communities safer by reducing crime and reoffending, reforming punishment for nonviolent and low risk offenders, and eliminating waste. Focusing scarce resources on violent criminals and recidivists will improve community safety. Private prisons are responsible for almost one fifth of Australian prison capacity and therefore have a key role in breaking the cycle of offending. Governments can focus private prison operators on this task by tying their profits to their performance in reducing recidivism, measured in simple and absolute terms that are consistent across all prisons and reported publicly. The goal must be to make rehabilitation and cost reduction integral to the business model of prisons by moving from privatisation to marketisation, so that all prisons (private and public) are subject to competitive pressure regarding their performance in rehabilitating offenders. Narrative Australia has a growing prison population and incarceration rate. This has led to massive costs: $15 billion annually on criminal justice, including $4 billion on prisons alone. However, despite this expenditure, almost half of those incarcerated will return to prison within two years of their release. Recidivism is therefore a key driver of the trend towards mass incarceration.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Illicit Drug Policy Timeline
    The Australian (illicit) drug policy timeline: 1985-2019 The Australian (illicit) drug policy timeline provides a list of key events, policy and legislative changes that have occurred in Australia between 1985 and 31 December 2019. Events are listed by jurisdiction, at the federal and state/ territory level. The first table includes events at the federal level. Events in the state and territories are split into two parts. The second table includes events from the Australian Capital Territory, Queensland, New South Wales and the Northern Territory. Events from South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia are listed in the third table. The timeline will continue to be updated bi-annually. Please email through comments or suggested inclusions. Suggested citation: Hughes, Caitlin. (2020). The Australian (illicit) drug policy timeline: 1985-2019, Drug Policy Modelling Program, UNSW and Centre for Crime Policy and Research, Flinders University. Last updated 15 January 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/sprc/research/drug-policy-modelling-program/drug-policy-timeline Year Federal 2019 Large increase in peak bodies – including the Australian Medical Association, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and the Ambulance Union State Council - formally endorsing a pill testing trial (Jan-Feb). QandA host a special episode on pill testing, drug law reform and drug policy. Panelists included Dr Marianne Jauncey, Dr David Caldicott, Acting Assistant Commissioner Stuart Smith, Former AFP Police Commissioner Mick Palmer and Kerryn Redpath (Feb 18). New report released: “Alcohol and other drug use in regional and remote Australia: consumption, harms and access to treatment” in the aim of identifying trends in alcohol and other drug use in Regional and remote Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Marijuana Australiana
    Marijuana Australiana Marijuana Australiana: Cannabis Use, Popular Culture, and the Americanisation of Drugs Policy in Australia, 1938 - 1988 John Lawrence Jiggens, BA Centre for Social Change Research Carseldine Campus QUT Submitted in requirement for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy, April 2004 1 Marijuana Australiana KEY WORDS: Narcotics, Control of—Australia, Narcotics and crime—Australia, Cannabis use— Australia, Popular Culture—Australia, Drugs policy—Australia, Organised crime— Queensland, New South Wales, Cannabis prohibition—Australia, Police corruption—Queensland, New South Wales, the counter-culture—Australia, Reefer Madness—Australia, the War on Drugs—Australia, Woodward Royal Commission (the Royal Commission into Drug Trafficking), the Williams Royal Commission (Australian Royal Commission into Drugs), the Fitzgerald Inquiry, the Stewart Royal Commission (Royal Commission into Nugan Hand), Chlorodyne, Cannabis— medical use, cannabis indica, cannabis sativa, Gough Whitlam, Richard Nixon, Donald Mackay, Johannes Bjelke- Petersen, Terry Lewis, Ray Whitrod, Fast Buck$, Chris Masters, John Wesley Egan, the Corset Gang, Murray Stewart Riley, Bela Csidei, Maurice Bernard 'Bernie' Houghton, Frank Nugan, Michael Jon Hand, Sir Peter Abeles, Merv Wood, Sir Robert Askin, Theodore (Ted) Shackley, Fred Krahe, James (Jimmy) Bazley, Gianfranco Tizzoni, Ken Nugan, Brian Alexander. 2 Marijuana Australiana ABSTRACT The word ‘marijuana’ was introduced to Australia by the US Bureau of Narcotics via the Diggers newspaper, Smith’s Weekly, in 1938. Marijuana was said to be ‘a new drug that maddens victims’ and it was sensationally described as an ‘evil sex drug’. The resulting tabloid furore saw the plant cannabis sativa banned in Australia, even though cannabis had been a well-known and widely used drug in Australia for many decades.
    [Show full text]
  • I0by20 Progress Report 2020 Update
    I0BY20 PROGRESS REPORT 2020 UPDATE 1 I0BY20 PROGRESS REPORT 2020 UPDATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COUNTRY The State Government would like to preface this report with an Acknowledgement of Country. The State Government acknowledge the Kaurna people as the custodians of the Adelaide region and that their cultural and heritage beliefs are still as important to the living Kaurna people today. The State Government would also like to pay respects to the cultural authority of Aboriginal people from other areas of South Australia and Australia who have contributed to the development of the Report and who will be involved in, or impacted by, the ongoing delivery of its recommendations. CONTENTS Minister’s Foreword 4 The Six Strategic Directions 7 1. Successful Return to Community 8 2. Employment and Industry 10 3. Prioritising Target Cohorts 12 4. Strategy for Aboriginal Offenders 16 5. DCS Agency and Staff Response 18 6. Partnerships and Collaboration 20 Acronyms List 22 I0BY20 PROGRESS REPORT 2020 UPDATE 3 MINISTER’S FOREWORD The 10by20 Progress Report 2020 touches on the achievements undertaken by the Department for Correctional Services (DCS) and provides an overview of progress in 2019. It also lists upcoming actions for 2020 against the six strategic directions taken by DCS to improve rehabilitative and organisational outcomes. These directions are grouped under the headings of successful return to community; employment and industry; prioritising target cohorts; strategy for Aboriginal offenders; DCS agency and staff response; and partnerships and collaboration. Since the election of the Marshall Liberal Government, I am proud to say that more than $200 million has been invested in corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreams of a Media Man
    DREAMS OF A MEDIA MAN by Brian M inards ’VE always considered myself a fairly Having taken my first business tele­ cision endorsed by my wife who sugges­ mild, well-mannered individual, but phone call at home at about 6 a.m. that ted that it was a good idea because II must confess, if Alexander Graham day the young man’s attitude was akin to Alexander Graham Bell could not hear Bell were alive today I would be of a the effect of the potion on Dr Jekyll — I me anyway. mind to seek him out and extract a became something of a Mr Hyde. Sleep began to overtake me but not degree of retribution. With hair bristling and quietly cursing before I realised, somewhat surprisingly, Since joining the Australian Federal I grasped the telephone and told this that my wife’s wisdom resembled that of Police as Media Liaison Officer in 1984 journalist — and I must confess in not so Sybil Fawlty. his cursed invention has caused me a fair diplomatic parlance — that I had news Actually my love-hate relationship amount of heartburn. for him and it was not all necessarily with the telephone began long before 1 One night recently, for instance, my good. joined the staff of the AFP. son had to deal with an over-enthusiastic, Such is the lot of a media liaison It was one of my tools of trade during objectionable Melbourne journalist at officer. my time as a broadcaster with two radio about 11 o’clock, who demanded to I got back into bed muttering about stations in Canberra — the ABC and speak to me despite being told that I had what dire consequences a meeting be­ 2CA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Bookie Robbery
    The Great Bookie Robbery Horse Racing Article by Pro Group Racing click here The Great Bookie Robbery is one of the most daring and dazzling robberies in modern history and Australian crime folklore. The robbery captured the imagination of ordinary law abiding Australian citizens while the victims were even forced to compliment on the robbery. The stolen cash was never recovered while none of the perpetrators were caught. A group of men walked into the Victoria Club in Melbourne on April 21, 1976. They took out their guns and told the cashier to hand over all the cash. The group of six men stole between $6 and $12 million from the club. The men had rented an office in the building in which the club was based on Queen Street in Melbourne where they hid the money they had robbed and made their getaway in a van. The men involved in the crime were Raymond Bennett, Ian Carroll, Laurence Prendergast, Brian and Leslie Kane and Norman Lee. The police could never find the money that was robbed. Norman Lee was charged and later acquitted. None of the other people were convicted. In 1992, Norman Lee was killed in a heist at Melbourne Airport. The details of the crime were revealed by Norman Lee’s lawyer, Phillip Dunn, QC, who revealed the details of the crime in the mid-1990s. Laurence Prendergast disappeared in 1985 and by 1987 the rest of the gang was murdered. The crime caught the imagination of the electronic media and in 1986 a miniseries of three 90 minute episodes was released showing the robbery.
    [Show full text]