DOCSLIB.ORG

Extradition - a Review of Australia’S Law and Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extradition - a Review of Australia’S Law and Policy The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia 5HSRUW Extradition - a review of Australia’s law and policy Joint Standing Committee on Treaties August 2001 © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ISBN &RQWHQWV Foreword..............................................................................................................................................vii Membership of the Committee..............................................................................................................ix Terms of reference ..............................................................................................................................xii Abbreviations and glossary................................................................................................................. xiii Recommendations...............................................................................................................................xv 1 Introduction...........................................................................................................1 The purpose of this report......................................................................................................... 1 The origins of this inquiry ......................................................................................................... 2 The conduct of our inquiry........................................................................................................ 3 The scope of this report ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Extradition: how it works.....................................................................................5 What is extradition? ................................................................................................................... 5 How Australia’s extradition scheme works ............................................................................. 7 Extradition from Australia ............................................................................................................. 7 Extradition to Australia.................................................................................................................. 8 Development of extradition law and policy ............................................................................. 8 General......................................................................................................................................... 8 Development of Australia’s extradition scheme ......................................................................... 11 Who decides on extradition........................................................................................................ 13 Exceptions to extradition ............................................................................................................ 14 Extradition in practice.............................................................................................................. 15 Australia’s main extradition partners .......................................................................................... 15 iv Refusal of extradition requests................................................................................................... 18 Types of offences ....................................................................................................................... 19 Conclusion................................................................................................................................ 21 3 The appropriate standard of evidence..............................................................21 Support for the move to “no evidence” ................................................................................. 22 Arguments in favour of the “no evidence” model ....................................................................... 22 Developments in the United Kingdom........................................................................................ 24 Criticism of the prima facie test .................................................................................................. 26 Criticism of the “no evidence” model .................................................................................... 28 Possible alternatives to the “no evidence” model................................................................ 32 Reinstitution of the prima facie case .......................................................................................... 33 Support for the existing test........................................................................................................ 33 Adding a right to cross-examine witnesses................................................................................ 34 More relaxed rules of evidence ..................................................................................................36 The Canadian model: ‘record of the case’.................................................................................. 36 A similar option under the London Scheme ............................................................................... 37 The US model: probable cause.................................................................................................. 38 The Committee’s comments ................................................................................................... 41 Our preferred approach.............................................................................................................. 42 The practical implications of requiring more proof ..................................................................... 43 Should Australian nationals be treated any differently?...................................................... 47 Conclusion.................................................................................................................................. 51 4 Other issues........................................................................................................53 Who should decide? ................................................................................................................ 53 Inability to present exculpatory evidence.............................................................................. 57 Establishing an extradition objection.......................................................................................... 59 Defences and excuses, including alibi evidence........................................................................ 60 The presumption against bail ................................................................................................. 61 Type of offence......................................................................................................................... 66 Who should pay?...................................................................................................................... 68 Determining an ‘extraditable person’..................................................................................... 69 Conclusion................................................................................................................................ 70 v Appendix A - Submissions and exhibits .................................................................73 List of submissions ..................................................................................................................... 73 List of exhibits............................................................................................................................. 74 Appendix B - Witnesses at public hearings ............................................................75 Tuesday 13 February 2001 - Sydney......................................................................................... 75 Monday 26 February 2001 - Canberra....................................................................................... 75 Wednesday 14 March 2001 - Melbourne ................................................................................... 76 Monday 26 March 2001 - Canberra ........................................................................................... 76 Appendix C - Australia’s Model Treaty ....................................................................77 Appendix D - Australia’s extradition relations........................................................89 Bibliography.............................................................................................................103 List of figures Figure 2.1 Process of extradition from Australia under the Extradition Act 1988 ................. 11 Figure 2.2 Extradition from Australia by requesting country 1980-81 to 1999-2000............. 17 Figure 2.3 Extradition to Australia 1980-81 to 1999-2000 .................................................... 18 Figure 2.4 Extradition requests granted 1980-81 to 1999-2000 ........................................... 19 Figure 2.5 Extraditions from Australia by type of offence 1990-91 to 1999-2000................. 21 List of tables Table 2.1 Refusal of extradition by Australia July 1991 to April 2001 ................................. 20 vi )RUHZRUG Crime is increasingly becoming an international concern, as the barriers to trade and the mass movement of people have diminished and as communication technologies have become more sophisticated. Money laundering, drug trafficking and people smuggling have become issues of major
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-Cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Case 2:17-Cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 194
    Case 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 194 1 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California 2 TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON, State Bar No. 207650 JOHN D. ECHEVERRIA, State Bar No. 268843 4 Deputy Attorneys General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 5 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5509 6 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 WILLIAM WIESE, et al., 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN 14 Plaintiff, EXHIBITS 7 THROUGH 17 TO THE DECLARATION OF ALEXANDRA 15 v. ROBERT GORDON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 16 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER XAVIER BECERRA, et al., AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 17 Defendant. Date: June 16, 2017 18 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 5 19 Judge: The Honorable William B. Shubb Action Filed: April 28, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Case 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 194 Exhibit 7 Gordon Declaration 00351 __ Case 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN Document 35-2 Filed 06/15/17 Page 3 of 194 SENIOR PARTNER OF COUNSEL C. D, MICHEL* MA1-THEW M. HORECZKO LOS ANGELES, CA MANAGING PARTNER JOSHUA ROBERT DALE A I SPECIAL COUNSEL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report on Trends in Police Corruption
    COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 COMMITTEE ON THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE POLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT ON TRENDS IN POLICE CORRUPTION December 2002 Parliament House Macquarie Street Sydney 2000 Tel: (02) 9230 2737 Fax: (02) 9230 3309 ISBN 0 7347 6899 0 Table Of Contents COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP .........................................................................................................i CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD..........................................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE – A TYPOLOGY OF POLICE CORRUPTION........................................................ 3 1.1 A BRIEF REVIEW OF POLICING AND ETHICS LITERATURE.............................................................. 3 1.2 DEFINING POLICE CORRUPTION.............................................................................................. 6 1.3 ROTTEN APPLE VS ROTTEN BARREL ...................................................................................... 10 1.4 CYCLES OF CORRUPTION.................................................................................................... 12 1.5 CORRUPTION – AN ETHICAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEM?....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Without Notice Friday,2 November
    Questions without Notice 2 November 1984 ASSEMBLY 1781 Friday,2 November 1984 COSTIGAN ROYAL COMMISSION REPORT The SPEAKER (the Hon. C. T. Edmunds) Mr ROSS-EDWARDS (Leader of the took the chair at 10.35 a.m. and read the National Party)-I refer the Premier to the prayer. many recommendations made by Mr Cos­ tigan in his report regarding legislative changes, which are necessary and urgent, QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE and the fact that ready acceptance of those recommendations was reached in principle by the Premier. In the light of those recom­ FEDERAL GOVERNMENT mendations, will the Premier give further PAMPHLET ON SCHOOLS consideration to this Parliament meeting in Mr JONA (Hawthorn)-On my last day's the first fortnight of December to bring sitting in Parliament, I raise with the Min­ about these legislative changes. I refer him ister of Education the 2015th issue I have to four particular areas where the need is raised in this Parliament, over the past 21 obvious: The Lotteries Gaming and Betting years. I ask the Minister whether he is aware Act, the Crimes Act, the Building Societies that the Federal Government pamphlet Act and the Bail Act. entitled "Improving Australian Schools" has Mr CAIN (Premier)-The Government been banned by the Western Australian responded quickly to the recommendations Labor Government for distribution within that were made. As I recollect, some 24 of Government schools in that State on the those recommendations affected Victoria ground that it is mere Federal election solely or in part, and the Government made propaganda, and that there have been moves decisions in respect of some eighteen of to ban the distribution of that booklet in them.
    [Show full text]
  • 17-56081, 10/12/2017, ID: 10616291, Dktentry: 13-4, Page 1 of 285
    Case: 17-56081, 10/12/2017, ID: 10616291, DktEntry: 13-4, Page 1 of 285 17-56081 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN, et al, Plaintiff and Appellees, v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendant and Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California No. 17-cv-1017-BEN-JLB The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, Judge APPELLANT’S EXCERPTS OF RECORD, VOLUME IV, ER 0650-0921 XAVIER BECERRA ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON Attorney General of California Deputy Attorney General THOMAS S. PATTERSON State Bar No. 207650 Senior Assistant Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 TAMAR PACHTER San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Supervising Deputy Attorney Telephone: (415) 703-5509 General Fax: (415) 703-5480 NELSON R. RICHARDS Email: ANTHONY P. O’BRIEN [email protected] Deputy Attorneys General Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Case: 17-56081, 10/12/2017, ID: 10616291, DktEntry: 13-4, Page 2 of 285 TABLE OF CONTENTS Date Page VOLUME I 6/29/17 Order Granting Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 28) ER0001 7/27/17 Notice of Appeal (Docket No. 32) ER0067 6/13/17 Reporter’s Transcript of Proceedings (Hearing on Motion for ER0069 Preliminary Injunction) 6/12/17 Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s Answer (Docket No. 25) ER0134 5/26/17 Order Granting Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening ER0148 Time (Docket No. 5) 5/25/17 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time ER0150 to Hear Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Marijuana Australiana
    Marijuana Australiana Marijuana Australiana: Cannabis Use, Popular Culture, and the Americanisation of Drugs Policy in Australia, 1938 - 1988 John Lawrence Jiggens, BA Centre for Social Change Research Carseldine Campus QUT Submitted in requirement for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy, April 2004 1 Marijuana Australiana KEY WORDS: Narcotics, Control of—Australia, Narcotics and crime—Australia, Cannabis use— Australia, Popular Culture—Australia, Drugs policy—Australia, Organised crime— Queensland, New South Wales, Cannabis prohibition—Australia, Police corruption—Queensland, New South Wales, the counter-culture—Australia, Reefer Madness—Australia, the War on Drugs—Australia, Woodward Royal Commission (the Royal Commission into Drug Trafficking), the Williams Royal Commission (Australian Royal Commission into Drugs), the Fitzgerald Inquiry, the Stewart Royal Commission (Royal Commission into Nugan Hand), Chlorodyne, Cannabis— medical use, cannabis indica, cannabis sativa, Gough Whitlam, Richard Nixon, Donald Mackay, Johannes Bjelke- Petersen, Terry Lewis, Ray Whitrod, Fast Buck$, Chris Masters, John Wesley Egan, the Corset Gang, Murray Stewart Riley, Bela Csidei, Maurice Bernard 'Bernie' Houghton, Frank Nugan, Michael Jon Hand, Sir Peter Abeles, Merv Wood, Sir Robert Askin, Theodore (Ted) Shackley, Fred Krahe, James (Jimmy) Bazley, Gianfranco Tizzoni, Ken Nugan, Brian Alexander. 2 Marijuana Australiana ABSTRACT The word ‘marijuana’ was introduced to Australia by the US Bureau of Narcotics via the Diggers newspaper, Smith’s Weekly, in 1938. Marijuana was said to be ‘a new drug that maddens victims’ and it was sensationally described as an ‘evil sex drug’. The resulting tabloid furore saw the plant cannabis sativa banned in Australia, even though cannabis had been a well-known and widely used drug in Australia for many decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreams of a Media Man
    DREAMS OF A MEDIA MAN by Brian M inards ’VE always considered myself a fairly Having taken my first business tele­ cision endorsed by my wife who sugges­ mild, well-mannered individual, but phone call at home at about 6 a.m. that ted that it was a good idea because II must confess, if Alexander Graham day the young man’s attitude was akin to Alexander Graham Bell could not hear Bell were alive today I would be of a the effect of the potion on Dr Jekyll — I me anyway. mind to seek him out and extract a became something of a Mr Hyde. Sleep began to overtake me but not degree of retribution. With hair bristling and quietly cursing before I realised, somewhat surprisingly, Since joining the Australian Federal I grasped the telephone and told this that my wife’s wisdom resembled that of Police as Media Liaison Officer in 1984 journalist — and I must confess in not so Sybil Fawlty. his cursed invention has caused me a fair diplomatic parlance — that I had news Actually my love-hate relationship amount of heartburn. for him and it was not all necessarily with the telephone began long before 1 One night recently, for instance, my good. joined the staff of the AFP. son had to deal with an over-enthusiastic, Such is the lot of a media liaison It was one of my tools of trade during objectionable Melbourne journalist at officer. my time as a broadcaster with two radio about 11 o’clock, who demanded to I got back into bed muttering about stations in Canberra — the ABC and speak to me despite being told that I had what dire consequences a meeting be­ 2CA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Bookie Robbery
    The Great Bookie Robbery Horse Racing Article by Pro Group Racing click here The Great Bookie Robbery is one of the most daring and dazzling robberies in modern history and Australian crime folklore. The robbery captured the imagination of ordinary law abiding Australian citizens while the victims were even forced to compliment on the robbery. The stolen cash was never recovered while none of the perpetrators were caught. A group of men walked into the Victoria Club in Melbourne on April 21, 1976. They took out their guns and told the cashier to hand over all the cash. The group of six men stole between $6 and $12 million from the club. The men had rented an office in the building in which the club was based on Queen Street in Melbourne where they hid the money they had robbed and made their getaway in a van. The men involved in the crime were Raymond Bennett, Ian Carroll, Laurence Prendergast, Brian and Leslie Kane and Norman Lee. The police could never find the money that was robbed. Norman Lee was charged and later acquitted. None of the other people were convicted. In 1992, Norman Lee was killed in a heist at Melbourne Airport. The details of the crime were revealed by Norman Lee’s lawyer, Phillip Dunn, QC, who revealed the details of the crime in the mid-1990s. Laurence Prendergast disappeared in 1985 and by 1987 the rest of the gang was murdered. The crime caught the imagination of the electronic media and in 1986 a miniseries of three 90 minute episodes was released showing the robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of Successful Criminal Entrepreneurs
    THE THEORY OF SUCCESSFUL CRIMINAL ENTREPRENEURS Khaled Alnkhailan BA Criminology and Criminal Justice MA Sociology Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law Queensland University of Technology 2017 Keywords Criminal entrepreneurs, organised crime, non-hierarchical structured organised crime, modus essendi, modus operandi, modus vivendi, leadership, vision, brokerage, bribery, blackmail, mentors, role models, human capital, the theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs. The theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs i ABSTRACT As typological category, criminal entrepreneurs have a different modus operandi from most traditional criminals. This study develops a theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs, operating in non-hierarchically structured organised crime. Successful criminal entrepreneurs cannot be described through classic criminological theories such as low self-control theory. The theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs provides an understanding of the leadership of criminal entrepreneurs which includes vision, leadership style and orientation, in addition to their identity. The theory also provides an understanding of the operational approaches used by successful criminal entrepreneurs in addition to the use of their social networks. The theory of successful criminal entrepreneurs argues that successful criminal entrepreneurs start their careers with a clearly defined vision. Criminal entrepreneurs then lead people towards their vision with a charismatic leadership
    [Show full text]
  • Final Appendices
    Appendices Independent Scientific Panel Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia Final Report to the Western Australian Government September 2018 Independent Scientific Panel Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia Locked Bag 33 Cloisters Square, Perth WA 6850 Phone: 08 6364 7306 Email: [email protected] There is no objection to this report being copied in whole or part, provided there is due acknowledgement of any material quoted or reproduced from the report. ISBN 978-0-646-99339-3 (online) This report is available on our website www.frackinginquiry.wa.gov.au Disclaimer The Independent Scientific Panel Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia is committed to quality service to its customers and makes every attempt to ensure accuracy, currency and reliability of the data contained in this document. However, changes in circumstances after time of publication may impact the quality of this information. Confirmation of the information may be sought from originating bodies or departments providing the information. Appendix 1 Findings and Recommendations of the Standing Committee on Environment and Public Affairs of the Western Australian Parliament 2015 Independent Scientific Panel Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation in Western Australia Fracking Inquiry Report_Appendices.indd 3 29/08/2018 2:02:21 PM This page has been intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 The Standing Committee on Environment and Public Affairs (Committee) identified in August 2013 that the emergence of an unconventional gas industry in Western Australia was a source of community interest and concern. 2 We resolved to investigate hydraulic fracturing and its implications for our State, with particular emphasis on environmental considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Proceedings
    PROOF ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/ E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (07) 3406 7314 Fax: (07) 3210 0182 Subject FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-SECOND PARLIAMENT Page Tuesday, 10 February 2009 MOTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders ........................................................................................................................ 1 ASSENT TO BILLS .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 4 December 2008, from Her Excellency the Governor to the Speaker advising of assent to a bill on 4 December 2008. ........................................................................................................................... 1 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 11 December 2008, from Her Excellency the Governor to the Speaker advising of assent to bills on 11 December 2008. .......................................................................................................................... 2 MOTION OF CONDOLENCE ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Murray, Mr
    [Show full text]
  • The Henry Lawson Festival of Arts
    The Henry Lawson Festival of Arts Walk of Fame Main Street Grenfell www.grenfell.org.au/walkoffame [email protected] 1958 Professor Colin Roderick CBE A graduate of Queensland and Melbourne Universities. Prominent author, academic and historian on Australian literature and a world authority on the works of Henry Lawson. He was involved in establishing, and subsequently became chair of, Australian Literature at Sydney University for which he earned his CBE. Also awarded the gold medal of the Australian Literature Society for his work on Lawson. 1959 Hon Ray S Maher MLA Born in Grenfell 1st April 1911. Despite being a talented student and completing an Arts Degree, the Depression forced Maher to give up plans of becoming a lawyer. Instead he developed a cementing business. This lead to involvement in trade unions and the Labor Party which he joined in 1927. Maher was elected to the Legislative Assembly from 1953 to 1965 and was speaker from 1959 to 1965. After politics one of many positions included adjudicator in public speaking in the City of Sydney eisteddfod. 1960 Olav Nordland The Norwegian Consul to Australia opened the festival in recognition of Henry Lawson’s Norwegian heritage. Nordland was delighted to see the festival as a centre of the arts, allowing expression through music, literature and poetry. He praised the hospitality of Grenfell and said the festival was one of his most delightful official duties. Nordland declared he would carry the memory of his visit to Grenfell for the rest of his life. 1961 Sir Eric Woodward KCVO Born on 21st July 1899 at Hay, he grew up on various properties in NSW and Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce PROVOST Retired Detective Superintendent AFP740 Page 1 Of
    Bruce PROVOST Retired Detective Superintendent AFP740 Bruce grew up on a farm in Macksville and was an active member of his local surf lifesaving club. He was a vintage car enthusiast and had an old 1936 Fargo Dodge Ute, from his Uncle Ernie’s property at Taylors Arms transported to Sydney, so that he could restore it. Such was his passion and as a means of relaxation, it was not uncommon for Bruce to rise out of bed early and put a few hours in restoring his Fargo before heading off to work. Retired Superintendent Ron CRAMP, (AFP541), put together his memories of his time working together with Bruce for his Eulogy; and the following insights were extracted from Ron’s notes. “In late 1982 I was attached to the Organised Crime Branch, Sydney. I was pleasantly surprised to be told that I would be working with Bruce PROVOST, along with other Detectives, investigating False Passport matters and Italian Organised Crime. During our investigations, Bruce, who was in charge of my team at Organised Crime Branch, developed an informant who was registered under the code name of “Tack”. This person later became known as a “Supergrass”. “Tack’s” information was invaluable as it gave an insider’s view of the activities of Robert TRIMBOLE and his associates. One valuable piece of “Tack’s” information identified a person working in the Sydney Passports Office who arranged false passports for TRIMBOLE. That person was subsequently prosecuted and imprisoned. About this same time the Stewart Royal Commission into Drug Trafficking into Australia commenced.
    [Show full text]