DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia's National Security Strategy Lead in 1. What Is Meant by the Term National Security? Read the Variety of Definitions An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia's National Security Strategy Lead in 1. What Is Meant by the Term National Security? Read the Variety of Definitions An Russia’s National Security Strategy Lead in 1. What is meant by the term national security? Read the variety of definitions and decide which of them is the most comprehensive and precise. 1. The protection or the safety of a country’s secrets and its citizens. 2. National security objectively means the absence of threats to acquired values and subjectively, the absence of fear that such values will be attacked. 3 National security is an appropriate and aggressive blend of political resilience and maturity, human resources, economic structure and capacity, technological competence, industrial base and availability of natural resources and finally the military might. 4. National security then is the ability to preserve the nation's physical integrity and territory; to maintain its economic relations with the rest of the world on reasonable terms; to preserve its nature, institution, and governance from disruption from outside; and to control its borders. 5. National security ... is best described as a capacity to control those domestic and foreign conditions that the public opinion of a given community believes necessary to enjoy its own self-determination or autonomy, prosperity and wellbeing. 2. Why is providing national security essential for any state? 3. What aspects of social life does national security cover? National Security Economic Socio-Political Security Military Environmental Security Security Security Foreign External Information Security EconomicSecurity External Component of National Security 1 Text 1 Russia’s National Security Strategy 02.01.2016 On the very last day of 2015, President Putin signed Russia’s National Security Strategy for 2016, updating the existing strategic planning document, which established the country’s national priorities until 2020. The Strategy is a key strategic planning document that establishes the national interests and strategic national priorities of the Russian Federation, and home and foreign policy goals, targets and measures directed at strengthening national security and ensuring the country’s stable long-term development. The National Security Strategy until 2020, which was approved by the president back in 2009, was a rather short list of priorities and apparently needed an update due to the changing environment Russia has found itself in. Here are the major points of the new edition. Russia in the Modern World The document acknowledges that the strengthening of Russia, its independent foreign and internal policy prompts the US and its allies to initiate counteraction, as they are striving to maintain their dominant position in the world. Thus they pursue a policy of constrain of Russia, which envisages exerting political, economic, military and information pressure. Therefore, Russia’s national priority is consolidating its position as one of the leading world powers. The country’s long-term national interests are: consolidating the Russian Federation’s status as one of the leading world powers, whose actions are aimed at ensuring strategic stability and mutually beneficial partnerships in the context of a multi-polar world. When it comes to national priorities, it emphasizes strengthening the country’s defenses protecting its constitutional system, sovereignty and territorial integrity, strengthening the national consensus, raising the quality of life, preserving and developing culture, improving economic competitiveness, and other principles of national security. Strategic tasks include ensuring food security through “ensuring Russia’s food independence”. In addition, the document calls for the accelerated development of Russia’s agriculture, increasing the effectiveness of government support for agribusiness, preventing the uncontrolled traffic of GMO foods, and also training highly prepared specialists for the agricultural sector. Forming a New Polycentric World Order The process of forming a new polycentric world order is accompanied by a rise in global and regional instability. Conflicts are escalating due to the uneven global development and the growing differences between various countries’ levels of well-being, the struggle over resources and market access, [and] control over trade routes. Competition between states is being extended to values and societal development models, human, technological, and scientific potential. 2 The struggle for influence in the international arena involves the whole range of political, financial/economic, and information instruments. The potential of secret services is being utilized more actively. Role of Force, Relations with NATO and Block Approach The document acknowledges that the role of force continues to dominate in the international relationship. The strive to increase and modernize the offensive weapons only weakens the global security system and the system of international treaties and agreements on arms control. The principles of equal and indivisible security are not being observed in the Euro-Atlantic, Eurasian and Asia-Pacific regions. The expansion of NATO and its approach to Russia’s borders has created a threat to national security. Expanding the force potential of NATO and endowing it with global functions which are implemented in violation of international legal norms, the block’s military activation, its continued expansion, and the approach of its military infrastructure to Russian borders, all create a threat to national security. The still-evident block approach to resolving international problems is not facilitating their response to a whole range of challenges and threats. The growth of migration from Africa and the Middle East to Europe has revealed the bankruptcy of the regional system of security in the Euro-Atlantic region that was built on the basis of NATO and the EU. The instigation of “color revolutions” is one of the main threats to Russia’s security. The regions neighboring Russia are characterized by growing militarization and arms race. The most important threats to Russia’s state and societal security are “the activity of radical societal groups and organizations which are using nationalist and extremist religious ideology, of foreign and international NGOs and financial and economic organizations, as well as private individuals, aimed at undermining the unity and territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, destabilizing the political and social situation inside the country, including through inspiring ‘color revolutions’ and destroying traditional Russian spiritual and moral values.” The document notes that the practice of overthrowing legitimate political authorities is becoming more widespread. The practice of overthrowing legitimate political authorities, provoking internal instability and conflict, is becoming more widespread. In addition to the still-existing areas of instability in the Middle and Far East, in Africa, South Asia, and the Korean Peninsula, new “hot spots” have appeared and the territory not controlled by any government authority has expanded. The US Military-Biological Lab Network The document states that the US is expanding its network of military- biological laboratories on the territory of countries neighboring Russia. The world still faces a high risk of proliferation and use of chemical weapons, and also the uncertainty as to which foreign countries have biological weaponry or the means to develop and produce it. 3 There is also the danger that the number of nuclear weapons states will increase. Politically unstable countries run a high risk of seeing conventional weapons fall into terrorist hands, and the “physical protection of dangerous objects and materials” is in a critical state. US and EU support for the anti-constitutional coup d’etat in Ukraine led to a deep schism in the Ukrainian society and an armed conflict. The document notes that the West’s effort to counter the integration processes and to create hot spots in the Eurasian region is having a negative influence on Russia’s pursuit of its national interests. The document emphasizes that the consolidation of an extreme right nationalist ideology, the deliberate effort to create a public image of Russia as an enemy is turning Ukraine into a long-term source of European instability located right next to Russia’s borders. 1. Answer the following questions. 1. What kind of document is the Strategy of 2015? 2. How does the document describe Russia? 3. Why is consolidating Russia’s position as one of the leading world powers so important for the state? 4. How is it possible to ensure food security? 5. Why are conflicts escalating? 6. What is the significance of force for the state security? 2. Translate the following word combination from English into Russian. 1. to establish national interests 2. the country’s stable long-term development 3. changing environment 4. to strive to maintain the dominant position in the world 5. ensuring Russia’s food independence 6. to escalate conflicts 7. to dominate in the international relationship 8. the still evident block approach 9. aimed at undermining the unity and territorial integrity 10. physical protection of dangerous objects and materials 3. Find in the text English equivalents to the following Russian word combinations. 1. территориальная целостность 2. предусматривать внешнеполитическое давление 3. обеспечить взаимовыгодное партнерство 4. укрепление национального согласия 5. ускоренное развитие 6. региональная нестабильность 7. ослабить глобальную (всеобщую) систему безопасности 4 8. нарушение международно-правовых норм 9. подстрекательство к совершению
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Russia You Never Met
    The Russia You Never Met MATT BIVENS AND JONAS BERNSTEIN fter staggering to reelection in summer 1996, President Boris Yeltsin A announced what had long been obvious: that he had a bad heart and needed surgery. Then he disappeared from view, leaving his prime minister, Viktor Cher- nomyrdin, and his chief of staff, Anatoly Chubais, to mind the Kremlin. For the next few months, Russians would tune in the morning news to learn if the presi- dent was still alive. Evenings they would tune in Chubais and Chernomyrdin to hear about a national emergency—no one was paying their taxes. Summer turned to autumn, but as Yeltsin’s by-pass operation approached, strange things began to happen. Chubais and Chernomyrdin suddenly announced the creation of a new body, the Cheka, to help the government collect taxes. In Lenin’s day, the Cheka was the secret police force—the forerunner of the KGB— that, among other things, forcibly wrested food and money from the peasantry and drove some of them into collective farms or concentration camps. Chubais made no apologies, saying that he had chosen such a historically weighted name to communicate the seriousness of the tax emergency.1 Western governments nod- ded their collective heads in solemn agreement. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank both confirmed that Russia was experiencing a tax collec- tion emergency and insisted that serious steps be taken.2 Never mind that the Russian government had been granting enormous tax breaks to the politically connected, including billions to Chernomyrdin’s favorite, Gazprom, the natural gas monopoly,3 and around $1 billion to Chubais’s favorite, Uneximbank,4 never mind the horrendous corruption that had been bleeding the treasury dry for years, or the nihilistic and pointless (and expensive) destruction of Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Surge? Russia’S Power Ministries from Yeltsin to Putin and Beyond
    Power Surge? Russia’s Power Ministries from Yeltsin to Putin and Beyond PONARS Policy Memo No. 414 Brian D. Taylor Syracuse University December 2006 The “rise of the siloviki ” has become a standard framework for analyzing Russian politics under President Vladimir Putin . According to this view, the main difference between Putin’s rule and that of former president Boris Yeltsin is the triumph of guns (the siloviki ) over money (the oligarchs). This approach has a lot to recommend it, but it also raises sever al important questions . One is the ambiguity embedded in the term siloviki itself . Taken from the Russian phrase for the power ministries ( silovie ministerstva ) or power structures ( silovie strukturi ), the word is sometimes used to refer to those ministrie s and agencies ; sometimes to personnel from those structures ; and sometimes to a specific “clan” in Russian politics centered around the deputy head of the presidential administration, former KGB official Igor Sechin . A second issue , often glossed over in the “rise of the siloviki ” story , is whether the increase in political power of men with guns has necessarily led to the strengthening of the state, Putin’s central policy goal . Finally, as many observers have pointed out, treating the siloviki as a unit – particularly when the term is used to apply to all power ministries or power ministry personnel – seriously overstates the coherence of this group. In this memo, I break down the rise of the siloviki narrative into multiple parts, focusing on three issues . First, I look at change over time, from the early 1990s to the present .
    [Show full text]
  • Chechnya. Calamity in the Caucasus' and Goltz, 'Azerbaijan Diary
    H-Russia Mannteufel on Gall and Waal, 'Chechnya. Calamity in the Caucasus' and Goltz, 'Azerbaijan Diary. A Rogue Reporter's Adventures in an Oil-Rich, War-Torn, Post-Soviet-Republic' Review published on Wednesday, November 1, 2000 Carlotta Gall, Thomas de Waal. Chechnya. Calamity in the Caucasus. New York: New York University Press, 1998. xiv + 416 pp. $26.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8147-3132-1.Thomas Goltz. Azerbaijan Diary. A Rogue Reporter's Adventures in an Oil-Rich, War-Torn, Post-Soviet-Republic. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1998. xxx + 528 pp. $39.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-7656-0244-2. Reviewed by Ingo Mannteufel (Journal OSTEUROPA. Zeitschrift für Gegenwartsfragen des Ostens, Aachen, Germany) Published on H-Russia (November, 2000) The Caucasus in the 1990s from the Perspective of War Correspondents The Caucasus in the 1990s from the Perspective of War Correspondents Since the last years of the Soviet Union the region around the Caucasus mountains has become an area of violent ethnic conflicts. The Armenian-Azerbaijan War for Nagorno-Karabakh, the hostilities in Georgia (South-Ossetia, Abkhazia), the clashes between Ossetians and Ingush within the Russian Federation, and last but not least the two large-scale Russian-Chechen Wars have drawn the attention of the international public to this up to then unknown region at the edge of Europe. But it was precisely this dangerous atmosphere that attracted journalists from all over the world to report directly from this new hot spot. Thomas Goltz, an American journalist who worked in Turkey during the 1980s, was one of these journalists.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghansi Terrorists Behind the Chechen Outrage
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 23, Number 4, January 19, 1996 �r1illIntemational Mghansi terrorists behind the Chechen outrage by Konstantin George On Jan. 9, a group of 150-200 Chechen terrorists attacked It must be added and emphasized that the Kizlyar terror­ the town of Kizlyar in the neighboring Russian Federation ism was made possible also by forces on the Russian side, autonomous republic of Daghestan, and seized the town hospi­ who, for their own neo-imperial reasons, are content to engage tal, holding at one point up to 3,000 civilians hostage. The in a new round of what in the 19th century had been called operation was led by Salman Raduyev, the son-in-law of the the "Great Game" between Britain and Russia for control notorious Gen. Dzhokhar Dudayev, the renegade president of and dominance in Central Asia. As the Russian media had "independent" Chechnya. The operation left at least 30 people reported, citing Interfax, Russian military intelligence, the dead, 13 civilians and 7 policemen, plus some 10- 15 terrorists, GRU, had warnedon Dec. 23 that a terrorist attack on Kizlyar most of whom died in a failed attack on the military airfield. was possible. For reasons still not explained, despite this time­ The terrorist operationis not over, following their pullout from ly warning, no measures were taken, either concerning Kiz­ Kizlyar in a bus and truck convoy with 160 civilian hostages. lyar, or along the Chechen-Daghestan border. The convoy got only as far the Daghestan-Chechnya bor­ der, stopped when Russian forces blew up the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Governors, Oligarchs, and Siloviki: Oil and Power in Russia
    Governors, Oligarchs, and Siloviki: Oil and Power in Russia Ahmed Mehdi, Shamil Yenikeyeff February 2013 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2013 ISBN: 978-2-36567-103-3 IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection of articles dedicated to the study of Russia and other former Soviet states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy- oriented papers deal with strategic, political and economic issues.
    [Show full text]
  • David Sheldon Boone Charging Him with Selling the Security Apparatus
    CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION In the early 1990s, the new Russian in the Leningrad KGB.1 Putin also quietly replaced counterintelligence service embarked on a mission fourteen presidential representatives in the regions to reclaim the former KGB’s internal security with former security offi cers. power, which had been diminished with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. A spate of press FSB director Patrushev said that, in 1999, his service articles in early 1996 by spokesmen for the Federal stopped the activities of 65 foreign individual Security Service (FSB) boasted the service’s role in offi cers and prevented 30 Russian citizens from protecting the state from foreign subversion. FSB passing secrets to foreign intelligence services. In offi cers noted that the service has the responsibility 1998, the FSB foiled the activities of 11 intelligence to monitor foreign astronauts at “Star City” and to offi cers and caught 19 Russian citizens attempting to prevent the emigration of Russian scientists. The sell classifi ed information to foreign secret services. FSB has also bragged about the arrest of Israeli, And in 1996, then-FSB chief Nikolai Kovalyov said Turkish, and North Korean spies and the expulsion the FSB had exposed 400 employees of foreign of a British businessman and an Israeli diplomat. intelligence services and 39 Russians working for The government moves against ecologists further them during the period 1994-96. revealed a resurgence of FSB internal power. The Sutyagin case follows the sentencing in Although there continues to be mutually benefi cial December 2000 of retired US Navy offi cer Edmund cooperation between Washington and Moscow, Pope to 20 years for spying.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Gradaute College
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADAUTE COLLEGE OPPOSITION TO AUTHORITARIANISM: IDEATIONAL AND MATERIAL RESOURCES IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPY By BURCU F. DEGIRMEN Norman, Oklahoma 2017 OPPOSITION TO AUTHORITARIANISM: IDEATIONAL AND MATERIAL RESOURCES IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY _____________________________ Dr. Charles D. Kenney, Chair _____________________________ Dr. Ann-Marie E. Szymanski ______________________________ Dr. Eric Heinze ______________________________ Dr. Katerina Tsetsura ______________________________ Dr. Jill A. Irvine © Copyright by BURCU F. DEGIRMEN 2017 All Rights Reserved. For my mentor, Dr. Charles D. Kenney Acknowledgments When I started my doctoral studies eight years ago, I could have hardly imagined this would be one of the greatest challenges and adventures of my adult life. I am very grateful to the Fulbright Commission for giving me this opportunity to pursue my PhD in the US. I must also thank OU Political Science Department and Graduate College for funding my work throughout the years. There have been many people who helped me along through my doctorate. First of all, I am enormously grateful to my adviser, Charles Kenney. Without his support, guidance, and encouragement, this dissertation would not be possible. Thank you, Prof. Kenney, for teaching and cultivating my interest in democratization and authoritarianism, providing me with constant feedback in the writing of this dissertation, and pushing me to become a better scholar. Thank you for always lending me a hand when I struggled to navigate through academe, research, and writing. Thank you for setting a great example as a teacher and mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Power in Russia: the Institutional Presidency
    TITLE : PRESIDENTIAL POWER IN RUSSIA : THE INSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENCY AUTHOR: EUGENE HUSKEY, Stetson University THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEA N RESEARC H TITLE Vlll PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 NCSEER NOTE This Report is an advance copy of Chapter 3 of a book manuscript currentl y in preparation, and is for discussion purposes only . It is being distributed b y the Council at this time with the author's permission because of it s timeliness. Chapter 2, which traces the evolution of the Russian presidenc y and the forces which shaped it, was distributed on August 9, 1996 . PROJECT INFORMATION : ' CONTRACTOR : Stetson University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Eugene Huskey COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 810-28 DATE : August 12, 199 6 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Counci l Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and othe r materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U .S . Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and material s available, outside the Council or U .S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except a s may be required under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law. The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council fo r Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U.
    [Show full text]
  • 8Organized Crime
    Darkness at Dawn Darkness The Rise of the Russian Criminal State at Dawn david satter Yale University Press / New Haven & London Published with assistance from the Louis Stern Memorial Fund. Copyright ∫ 2003 by David Satter. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustra- tions, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Printed in the United States of America by R. R. Donnelley & Sons. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Satter, David, 1947– Darkness at dawn : the rise of the Russian criminal state / David Satter. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-300-09892-8 (alk. paper) 1. Organized crime—Russia (Federation) 2. Russia (Federa- tion)—Social conditions—1991– I. Title. HV6453.R8 S27 2003 364.1%06%0947—dc21 2002015754 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. 10987654321 To the honest people of Russia For nothing is hidden except to be known and nothing is secret except to be revealed. —Mark 4:22 Contents Preface ix List of Abbreviations and Administrative Delineations x Introduction 1 1 The Kursk 5 2 Ryazan 24 3 The Young Reformers 34 4 The History of Reform 45 5 The Gold Seekers 72 6 The Workers 93 7 Law Enforcement 112 8 Organized Crime 127 9 Ulyanovsk 156 10 Vladivostok 165 11 Krasnoyarsk 182 12 The Value of Human Life 198 13 The Criminalization of Consciousness 222 Conclusion: Does Russia Have a Future? 248 Notes 257 Bibliography 289 Acknowledgments 303 Index 305 Illustrations follow page 126 Preface In Darkness at Dawn, I have tried to describe the rise of a business criminal elite and its takeover of the machinery of the Russian state, leading to the impoverishment and demoralization of the great majority of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Role in the Emerging Eurasian Security
    RUSSIA’S ROLE IN THE EMERGING EURASIAN SECURITY ENVIRONMENT David Sacko 2008 INSS RESEARCH PAPER US AIR FORCE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES USAF ACADEMY, COLORADO RUSSIA’S ROLE IN THE EMERGING EURASIAN SECURITY ENVIRONMENT By David Sacko* 2008 OVERVIEW Russian foreign policy has taken an interesting turn during the administration of President Vladimir Putin. Following the proposed deployment of a strategic ballistic missile defense system in Central Europe, Mr. Putin threatened withdrawal from both the Conventional Forces Europe (CFE) and Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty in addition to retargeting nuclear missiles to Poland and the United States. Beyond rhetoric, concrete acts of Russian aggression include attempting to claim resource rich elements of the Arctic region, resuming bomber patrols, and invading Georgian airspace culminating in the invasion of Georgia itself. While these seemingly hostile acts are occurring, a great deal of cooperation exists between the United States and Russia in the US-led global war on terrorism. On other fronts, such as relations with the Chinese and Iranian nuclear ambitions, Russian policies seem much more ambivalent and even contradictory What might possibly explain this seemingly contradictory series of policies? Tip O‘Neill says, ―All politics is (are) local.‖ It is the thesis of this project that Russian foreign policy is best understood through an understanding of Russian domestic politics and the dominant interests that supports Mr. Putin‘s policies: the military, the oligarchs, the Russian popular nationalist imperative and Putin‘s political machine itself. This paper will begin with an overview of basic Russian strategic thinking, but will probe more into the construction of Russian ideas and how those ideas have been made manifest within the Russian political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Unforeseen Consequences of a Soviet Intervention: the Movement of the "Afghans" in Militant Islamism Borcke, Astrid Von
    www.ssoar.info Unforeseen consequences of a Soviet intervention: the movement of the "Afghans" in militant Islamism Borcke, Astrid von Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Monographie / monograph Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Borcke, A. v. (1996). Unforeseen consequences of a Soviet intervention: the movement of the "Afghans" in militant Islamism. (Sonderveröffentlichung / BIOst). Köln: Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49019 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Intelligence and State Security Services
    Russian Intelligence and State Security Services From Wikipedia related-articles and www.tridentmilitary.com GRU GRU Generalnovo Shtaba Glavnoje Razvedyvatel'noje Upravlenije Главное Разведывательное Управление From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia GRU or Glavnoje Razvedyvatel'noje Upravlenije is the acronym for the foreign military intelligence directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, (formerly the Red Army General Staff of the Soviet Union). GRU is the English transliteration of the Russian acronym ГРУ , which stands for "Главное Разведывательное Управление", meaning Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian Armed Forces General Staff. The full name is GRU GSh (GRU Generalnovo Shtaba (or "GenShtaba"), i.e. "GRU of the General Staff"). The GRU is Russia's largest intelligence agency. It deploys six times as many agents in foreign countries as the SVR which is the KGB intelligence successor. It also commanded 25,000 spetsnaz troops in 1997. [1] The current GRU Director is General of the Army Valentin Vladimirovich Korabelnikov. History The GRU was created in 1918 by the Bolshevik Communist Party under Lenin, and given the task of handling all military intelligence, particularly the collection of intelligence of military or political significance from sources outside the Soviet Union. The GRU operated residencies all over the world, along with the SIGINT (signals intelligence) station in Lourdes, Cuba, and throughout the former Soviet bloc countries, especially in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. The first head of the GRU was Janis Karlovich Berzin, a Latvian Communist and former member of the Cheka, who remained in the post until 28 November 1937, when he was arrested and subsequently liquidated during Stalin's purges.
    [Show full text]