The Expression and Nuclear Deposition of Histone H3.1 In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Reproduction and Development, Vol. 58, No 5, 2012 —Original Article— The Expression and Nuclear Deposition of Histone H3.1 in Murine Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos Machika KAWAMURA1), Tomohiko AKIYAMA1)#, Satoshi TSUKAmoto2), Masataka G. SUZUKI1) and Fugaku AokI1) 1)Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8562, Japan 2)Laboratory of Animal and Genome Science Section, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-8555, Japan #Present: Laboratory of Genetics, NIH Biomedical Research Center, Baltimore, MD 21224, U.S.A. Abstract. Differentiated oocytes acquire totipotency through fertilization. During this transition, genome-wide chromatin remodeling occurs, which leads to change in gene expression. However, the mechanism that underlies this global change in chromatin structure has not been fully elucidated. Histone variants play a key role in defining chromatin structure and are implicated in inheritance of epigenetic information. In this study, we analyzed the nuclear localization and expression of H3.1 to elucidate the role of this histone variant in chromatin remodeling during oogenesis and preimplantation development. Analysis using Flag-tagged H3.1 transgenic mice revealed that Flag-H3.1 was not present in differentiated oocytes or early preimplantation embryos before the morula stage, although Flag-H3.1 mRNA was expressed at all stages examined. In addition, the expression levels of endogenous H3.1 genes were low at the stages where H3.1 was not present in chromatin. These results suggest that H3.1 is not incorporated into chromatin due to the inactivity of the histone chaperone and low mRNA expression level. The significance of the dynamics of H3.1 is evaluated in terms of chromatin remodeling that takes place during development. Key words: H3.1, H3 variants, Oocyte, Preimplantation embryo, Reprogramming (J. Reprod. Dev. 58: 557–562, 2012) ifferentiated gametes, eggs and sperm, acquire totipotency is incorporated into chromatin by histone regulator A (HIRA) and Dthrough fertilization [1, 2]. During this developmental process, DAXX-ATRX [9, 11–13]. Since each H3 variant is associated with genome-wide chromatin remodeling takes place that alters the gene different histone modifications and genome regions, this suggests that expression pattern and begins differentiation [1–3]. This chromatin each variant serves a unique role in chromatin structure [6, 7, 10]. remodeling is essential in erasing previous epigenetic markers Although H3.3 and its role in chromatin remodeling have been and forming and transmitting new ones to the next generation [1, extensively studied in different model organisms, the role of H3.1 is 4]. However, the mechanism that underlies this global change in not well known. For example, the dynamics of H3.3 during oogenesis chromatin structure during development has not been fully elucidated. and preimplantation development have been studied in mice [10, Recent studies have shown that in addition to histone modifications 14]. Although H3.3 is incorporated in oocytes, this histone variant and transcription factors, histone variants play a key role in defining rapidly disappears and then reappears just after fertilization [10]. and altering chromatin structure [5]. Nucleosomes consist of 4 different Defects in heterochromatin formation have been reported in embryos histones, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Notably, the association between H3 expressing mutated H3.3 [14]. In addition, in Arabidopsis, H3.3 is variants and chromatin remodeling has been extensively studied. In present in both gametes but rapidly disappears after fertilization, mammals, there are five histone H3 variants, i.e., centromere-specific and only the paternal H3.3 remains in the zygote [15]. Finally, CENP-A, testis-specific H3.1t and three major H3 variants, H3.1, H3.3 is associated with decondensation of the paternal genome after H3.2 and H3.3 [6–9]. H3.1 and H3.2, which differ by 1 amino acid, fertilization in Drosophila melanogaster [16]. Consequently, these are canonical histones expressed and incorporated into chromatin in altogether suggest that H3.3 is essential for chromatin remodeling a DNA replication-dependent manner. Although H3.1 and H3.2 are and for acquiring a totipotent characteristic in 1-cell embryos, but associated with heterochromatin, they differ in histone modifications little is known about the role of H3.1 in chromatin remodeling before [6–8]. In contrast, H3.3 is expressed and incorporated into chromatin and after fertilization. throughout the cell cycle and is associated with euchromatin [6, 8, In this study, we analyzed the nuclear localization and expression 10]. H3.1 is deposited into chromatin via the histone chaperone of H3.1 to elucidate the role of this histone variant in chromatin called chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) [9–11], whereas H3.3 remodeling during oogenesis and preimplantation development. H3 variants are similar in amino acid sequence, and currently, there are no antibodies that recognize each variant. Therefore, we generated Received: April 20, 2012 Flag-tagged H3.1 transgenic mice that ubiquitously express Flag-H3.1 Accepted: May 15, 2012 Published online in J-STAGE: June 14, 2012 to analyze the presence of Flag-H3.1 in the chromatin. In addition, ©2012 by the Society for Reproduction and Development the expression of H3.1 genes was analyzed. Finally, the biological Correspondence: F Aoki (e-mail: [email protected]) significance and mechanisms concerning nuclear incorporation of 558 KAWAMURA et al. H3.1 are discussed. Tween 20 (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, U.S.A.) overnight at 4 C. After being washed in 1% BSA/PBS three times, they were incubated Materials and Methods with the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated mouse IgG secondary antibody diluted 1:100 with 1% BSA/PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 for 1 h at Transgenic mouse room temperature. The cells were then mounted on VECTASHIELD The pCAGGS vector [17], which contains the CAG promoter (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, U.S.A.), an anti-bleaching and a 3’UTR region of rabbit β-globin, was used to generate CAG reagent, and were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope promoter-driven Flag-tagged H3.1 transgenic mice. For microinjection, (Carl Zeiss 510, Oberkochen, Germany). the transgene was diluted to 4 ng/μl in Tris/EDTA buffer (pH7.5) and microinjected into the pronucleus of C57 BL/6 1-cell embryos (Japan Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) SLC, Shizuoka, Japan). One day after microinjection, normal 2-cell For RT-PCR analyses to detect the expression of Flag-H3.1 embryos were collected and transferred to day 0.5 pseudopregnant transgene, 10 oocytes/embryos were placed in 400 μl ISOGEN ICR (MCH) females (Japan SLC). Thirty-four mice were screened, (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). RNA was extracted by following the and seven of them were positive for the transgene. The founder manufacturer’s protocol (Nippon Gene), and reverse transcription transgenic mouse was backcrossed twice with C57 BL/6 female was carried out with an Oligo dT Primer using a PrimeScript RT- mice (Japan SLC). The pups were subjected to genotyping of the PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). PCR was carried out using Ex transgene by PCR. Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa) and 0.4 oocytes/embryos cDNA in a tube as a template. Flag-H3.1 was detected with the follow- Oocyte collection ing primers: 5’ATGACGACGATAAGGGAGGA3’ (forward) and Growing oocytes were collected from nine-day-old mice. The 5’CTCGGTCGACTTCTGGTAGC3’ (reverse). PCR conditions were ovaries were dissected in HEPES-buffered KSOM (potassium as follows: 95 C for 30 sec (denaturation), 57 C for 30 sec (annealing) simplex optimized medium) [18]. The ovaries were further dissected and then 72 C for 30 sec (elongation). Fifty pg of Rabbit α-globin after trypsin treatment to obtain additional growing oocytes. The mRNA (Sigma-Aldrich) was added into the samples before RNA growing oocytes were placed in α-minimum essential medium extraction as an external control and was detected with the following (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, U.S.A.) supplemented with 5% primers: 5’GTGGGACAGGAGCTTGAAAT3’ (forward) and 5’ fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) and 10 GCAGCCACGGTGGCGAGTAT3’ (reverse). The PCR conditions ng/μl epidermal growth factor (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) were: 95 C for 20 sec (denaturation), 58 C for 30 sec (annealing), until use for immunocytochemistry or RT-PCR analysis. Full-grown and 72 C for 30 sec (elongation). oocytes were collected from three- to five-week-old mice 48 h after For real-time PCR analyses to examine the expression levels of injection of 5 IU pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Aska endogenous histone H3 variants, 40 oocytes/embryos from three- Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan). week-old ddY mice (Japan SLC) were placed in 400 μl ISOGEN (Nippon Gene), and RNA was extracted. The contaminated DNA In vitro fertilization and embryo culture was digested with DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.) for 40 To obtain mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes, three- to five-week- min at 37 C, and then RNA was purified with phenol/chloroform or old mice were superovulated by injection of 5 IU of human chorionic ISOGEN. Primers were based on the common sequences of several gonadotropin (hCG; Aska Pharmaceutical) 48 h after injection of genes encoding H3.1 as well as to the individual sequences of H3.1 PMSG. The oocytes were collected in human tubal fluid (HTF) genes (Table 1). The primers of common sequences in each of H3.2 medium [19] from the ampulla of the oviduct 16 h after injection and H3.3 were also prepared. Two-step PCR reactions were carried of hCG. Sperm was collected from ICR mice (Japan SLC). In vitro out with the following conditions using a Thermal Cycler Dice Real fertilization was carried out in the HTF medium by fertilizing the Time System (TaKaRa): 95 C for 5 sec (denaturation) and 60 C for MII stage oocytes with the sperm, which had been preincubated 30 sec (annealing/elongation).