DOCSLIB.ORG

Nouns, Verbs and Sentences 98-348: Lecture 2 Any Questions About the Homework? Everyone Read One Word

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nouns, Verbs and Sentences 98-348: Lecture 2 Any Questions About the Homework? Everyone Read One Word Nouns, Verbs, and Sentences 98-348: Lecture 2 Nouns, verbs and sentences 98-348: Lecture 2 Any questions about the homework? Everyone read one word • Þat var snimma í ǫndverða bygð goðanna, þá er goðin hǫfðu sett Miðgarð ok gǫrt Valhǫ́ll, þá kom þar smiðr nǫkkurr ok bauð at gøra þeim borg á þrim misserum svá góða at trú ok ørugg væri fyrir bergrisum ok hrímþursum, þótt þeir kœmi inn um Miðgarð; en hann mælti sér þat til kaups, at hann skyldi eignask Freyju, ok hafa vildi hann sól ok mána. How do we build sentences with words? • English • The king slays the serpent. • The serpent slays the king. • OI • Konungr vegr orm. king slays serpent (What does this mean?) • Orm vegr konugr. serpent slays king (What does this mean?) How do we build sentences with words? • English • The king slays the serpent. • The serpent slays the king. They have the • OI same meaning! • Konungr vegr orm. But why? king slays serpent ‘The king slays the serpent.’ • Orm vegr konugr. serpent slays king ‘The king slays the serpent.’ Different strategies to mark subjects/objects • English uses word order: (whatever noun) slays (whatever noun) This noun is a subject! This noun is a subject! • OI uses inflection: konung r konung This noun is a subject! This noun is an object! Inflection • Words change their forms to encode information. • This happens in a lot of languages! • English: • the kid one kid • the kids more than one kid • We say that English nouns inflect for number, i.e. English nouns change forms based on what number they have. • The suffix –s marks nouns as plural. • What about other languages? Inflection in OI • Remember: • konungr with r ”king” as a subject konung no r ”king” as an object • If we say English nouns inflect for number, what do OI nouns inflect for? Case Property Property Weight Number Value Value 60kg Singular konungr Property Property Height Case Value Value 170cm Nominative Forms of konungr ”king” in all 4 cases of OI • Nominative case konungr • Dative case konungi • Genitive case konungs • Accusative case konung or konung-∅ • The suffixes r, i, s and the empty suffix (∅) are case-markers • The names of these cases are pretty arbitrary, we could have called them Case 1, Case 2, … What are these cases used for? • Nominative: for subjects Accusative: for objects • Konungr vegr orm. king[NOM] slays serpent[ACC] ‘The king slays the serpent.’ • Which one is in the nominative? Accusative? • Dative: for indirect objects • Dvergr gefr konungi brand dwarf[NOM] gives king[DAT] sword[ACC] ’The dwarf gives the sword to the king.’ • Translates roughly to English ”to …” What are these cases used for? • Genitive: indicate possession • konungr noregs king[NOM] Norway[GEN] ‘king of Norway’ • The possessor is in the genitive, not the possessee! The beginner’s vocabulary list • All of the listed nouns follow the same inflectional paradigm: • Nominative Stem + r hestr • Genitive Stem + s hests • Dative Stem + i hesti • Accusative Stem hest • Also contains a few verbs Practice! Endings álfr “elf” hjálmr “helmet” knífr “knife” Nominative r Genitive s Dative i Accusative Translate! 1. Draugr sér álf. 2. Hest á konungr. 3. Álfr gefr baug dvergi. 4. Ormr Sigurðs vegr hest Óláfs. 5. Hjálm Hauks á Tyrfingr. Translate! a. The horse sees the wolf. b. The king takes the knife. c. The dwarf slays the ghost. d. The dwarf gives the sword to the elf. e. Tyrfing’s hawk kills Olaf’s serpent. Inflection for number • a king vs. kings Singular Plural Nominative konungr konungar • konungr vs. konungar Genitive konungs konunga Dative konungi konungum • Our inflection paradigm is now a Accusative konung konunga combination of case and number Singular Plural Nominative r ar Genitive s a Dative i um Accusative a Practice! Endings Singular Plural dvergr “dwarf” Singular Plural Nominative r ar Nominative Genitive s a Genitive Dative i um Dative Accusative a Accusative úlfr “wolf” Singular Plural haukr “hawk” Singular Plural Nominative Nominative Genitive Genitive Dative Dative Accusative Accusative Translate! 1. brandar Sigurds a. the king’s rings 2. Hesta konunga sér draugr. b. The hawk takes the knife. 3. Tyrfingr gefr úlfum hjálma. c. Hauk gives swords to the dwarves. Inflection for definiteness • a king vs. the king Singular def Plural def Nominative konungrinn konungarnir • kings vs. the kings Genitive konungsins konungana Dative konunginum konungunum Accusative konunginn konunganna konung-r inn ”king-NOM” ”the[NOM]” Singular def Plural def Nominative rinn arnir Genitive sins ana konung-rinn Dative inum unum ”king-NOM;DEF” Accusative inn anna One note about glosses • Previously: 1st line = words, 2nd line = word-by-word translation: • Konungrinn vegr orminn. the.king[NOM;DEF] slays the.serpent[ACC;DEF] • When the word can be clearly broken apart into morphemes, i.e. parts that each contribute a meaning/grammatical function (e.g. case, number, definiteness, etc.): • Konung-rinn vegr orm-inn. 1st line = words separated by king-NOM;DEF slays serpent-ACC;DEF morphemes 2nd line = morpheme-by- morpheme translation Marking definiteness: English vs. OI • What’s the difference? Marking definiteness: English vs. OI • What’s the difference? • English uses a separate word that indicates definiteness • OI changes nouns to indicate definiteness • English uses an analytical approach • OI uses a synthetic approach English is analytic when it comes to… • Positional/temporal relations • Prepositions: I go to Carnegie Mellon. above the average What did you do during the summer? • Finnish does this synthetically with case marking (talo “house”) • Menen hänen talo-on-sa. go his/her house-ILLATIVE-his/her The illative case is used to ‘I’m going to his/her house.’ indicate towardness. • viime joulu-sta lähtien last Christmas-ELATIVE since The elative case is used to ‘since last Christmas’ indicate fromness. English has an analytic/synthetic split for… • Tense We’ll avoid the debate about if • Past tense is synthetic: I walked. English future is She thought of something. really a tense • Future tense is analytic: John will be there. per se… The train is going to be late. • Inuktitut (spoken in Nunavut, Canada) is very synthetic • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Inuit_grammar#Modifiers_of_tense English is synthetic when it comes to… • Plurals! • Mandarin Chinese is analytic: • book → books • ren2 ren2 men • knife → knives person person PLURAL • sheep → sheep ‘a/the person’ ‘(the) people’ • foot → feet • tu4zi tu4zi men rabbit rabbit PLURAL • child → children ‘a/the rabbit’ ‘(the) rabbits’ • formula → formulae • gong1shi4 • scheme → schemata formula • cherub → cherubim ‘a/the formula(e)’ • … No plural if the noun is inanimate One problem • How do we say: • The king slays the orms. ? • The kings slay the orm. ? One problem • How do we say: • The king slays the orms. Konugrinn vegr ormarna. • The kings slay the orm. Konungarinn vegr vegum orminn. • Why? Verbs inflect too! • English: vega “slay” Singular Plural • I/we/you/they/y’all think 1st person veg vegum • He/she/it thinks 2nd person vegr vegið • OI: 3rd person vegr vega • veg ”(I) slay” • vegr ”(you/he/she/it) slays” • vegum ”(we) slay” • vegið „(y‘all) slay“ • vega „(they) slay“ • Verbs inflect for person and number • Your list has 3sg and 3pl forms Now we can make sentences! • We just need to build our vocab and we can read anything… • Really? Not just one declension/conjugation pattern… • Inflection of nouns is called declension • Inflection of verbs is called conjugation • These are just one among the many… • There are about 4 declension and 11 conjugation patterns Sg indef Pl indef Sg def Pl def Sg Pl Nominative r ar rinn arnir 1 um Genitive s a sins ana 2 r ið Dative i um inum unum 3 r a Accusative a inn anna Thank you Any questions? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functional Projections in Finnish Non-Finite Constructions
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 2 Issue 1 Working Papers Article 8 1-1-1995 Functional Projections in Finnish Non-Finite Constructions Anne Vainikka Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Vainikka, Anne (1995) "Functional Projections in Finnish Non-Finite Constructions," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol2/iss1/8 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol2/iss1/8 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Functional Projections in Finnish Non-Finite Constructions This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol2/iss1/8 Functional Projections in Finnish Non-Finite Constructions Anne Vainikka 1 Introduction It is an open question whether the functional projections above the VP projection are the same, either across languages or within a single language. Based on the morphosyntactic evidence in Finnish, and following Baker’s (1985) Mirror Principle, the functional projec- tions of the non-finite clause differ from those of the finite clause, although both types of clauses contain a VP projection. This suggests that UG allows for more than one possible combination of functional projections as an extended projection of VP. The structure of the non-finite clause in Finnish indicates, however, that projections are not combined in an arbitrary manner. Rather, all of the five productively used non-finite constructions can be analyzed as instances of the following pattern: V + infinitival suffix (+ case suffix (+ possessive suffix)).
    [Show full text]
  • Language Interaction in Emergent Grammars: Morphology and Word Order in Bilingual Children’S Code-Switching
    languages Article Language Interaction in Emergent Grammars: Morphology and Word Order in Bilingual Children’s Code-Switching Virve-Anneli Vihman 1,2 1 Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, University of Tartu, 50090 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected] 2 Department of Language and Linguistics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK Received: 13 February 2018; Accepted: 19 October 2018; Published: 31 October 2018 Abstract: This paper examines the morphological integration of nouns in bilingual children’s code-switching to investigate whether children adhere to constraints posited for adult code-switching. The changing nature of grammars in development makes the Matrix Language Frame a moving target; permeability between languages in bilinguals undermines the concept of a monolingual grammatical frame. The data analysed consist of 630 diary entries with code-switching and structural transfer from two children (aged 2;10–7;2 and 6;6–11;0) bilingual in Estonian and English, languages which differ in morphological richness and the inflectional role of stem changes. The data reveal code-switching with late system morphemes, variability in stem selection and word order incongruence. Constituent order is analysed in utterances with and without code-switching, and the frame is shown to draw sometimes on both languages, raising questions about the MLF, which is meant to derive from the grammar of one language. If clauses without code-switched elements display non-standard morpheme order, then there is no reason to expect code-switching to follow a standard order, nor is it reasonable to assume a monolingual target grammar. Complex morphological integration of code-switches and interaction between the two languages are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Young Children Acquire Case Marking?
    INVESTIGATING FINNISH-SPEAKING CHILDREN’S NOUN MORPHOLOGY: HOW DO YOUNG CHILDREN ACQUIRE CASE MARKING? Thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences 2015 HENNA PAULIINA LEMETYINEN SCHOOL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 8 DECLARATION .......................................................................................................................... 9 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT .......................................................................................................... 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: General introduction to language acquisition research ...................................... 11 1.1. Generativist approaches to child language............................................................ 11 1.2. Usage-based approaches to child language........................................................... 14 1.3. The acquisition of morphology .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ongoing Eclipse of Possessive Suffixes in North Saami
    Te ongoing eclipse of possessive sufxes in North Saami A case study in reduction of morphological complexity Laura A. Janda & Lene Antonsen UiT Te Arctic University of Norway North Saami is replacing the use of possessive sufxes on nouns with a morphologically simpler analytic construction. Our data (>2K examples culled from >.5M words) track this change through three generations, covering parameters of semantics, syntax and geography. Intense contact pressure on this minority language probably promotes morphological simplifcation, yielding an advantage for the innovative construction. Te innovative construction is additionally advantaged because it has a wider syntactic and semantic range and is indispensable, whereas its competitor can always be replaced. Te one environment where the possessive sufx is most strongly retained even in the youngest generation is in the Nominative singular case, and here we fnd evidence that the possessive sufx is being reinterpreted as a Vocative case marker. Keywords: North Saami; possessive sufx; morphological simplifcation; vocative; language contact; minority language 1. Te linguistic landscape of North Saami1 North Saami is a Uralic language spoken by approximately 20,000 people spread across a large area in northern parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland. North Saami is in a unique situation as the only minority language in Europe under intense pressure from majority languages from two diferent language families, namely Finnish (Uralic) in the east and Norwegian and Swedish (Indo-European 1. Tis research was supported in part by grant 22506 from the Norwegian Research Council. Te authors would also like to thank their employer, UiT Te Arctic University of Norway, for support of their research.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominal Head-Marking Constructions: Two Case Studies from Luiseno˜ Andreas Kathol UC Berkeley
    Nominal head-marking constructions: two case studies from Luiseno˜ Andreas Kathol UC Berkeley 1 Introduction From the view point of Nichols’ (1986) seminal typological study, most work in formal syntax has concentrated on dependent-marking constructions.1 This kind of construction is illustrated in (1) from Swedish in which the difference in subject vs. object role is expressed exclusively on the dependent nominals while the verb itself does not reflect those dependents. (1) Swedish a. Jag h¨orde dem. I heard them b. De h¨orde mig. they heard me Relatively less work has been done on head-marking constructions of the kind illustrated in (2) from Lakhota (Valin 2001:98). Here the dependents are recorded on the head verb as affixes (in particular, infixes) but the nominal dependents themselves bear no case marking. (2) Lakhota ? j j i a. [Miy´e] i [math´o ki hen´a] na-w´ıchaˇ -wa -x u¸. 1SG bear the those stem-3PL.OBJ-1SG.SUBJ-hear ‘I heard those bears.’ ; ? j j i b. [Math´o ki hen´a]i [miy´e] na-ma´ - -x u¸. bear the those 1SG stem-1SG.OBJ-3PL.SUBJ-hear ‘Those bears heard me.’ As is common in such constructions, the verb does not require any accompanying phrasal material for a clause to count as saturated. If left unexpressed, the dependents are understood pronominally, as illustrated in (3). (3) a. Na-w´ıchaˇ -wa-x ?u¸. stem-3PL.OBJ-1SG.SUBJ-hear ‘I heard them.’ ; ? j b. Na-ma´ - i -x u¸. stem-1SG.OBJ-3PL.SUBJ-hear ‘They heard me.’ 1I would like to thank the audience of the Eighth International Conference on HPSG in Trondheim for comments and discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Positions for Oblique Case-Marked Arguments in Hungarian Noun Phrases1
    17.1-2 (2016): 295-319 UDC 811.511.141'367.4=111 UDC 811.511.411'367.622=111 Original scientific article Received on 10. 07. 2015 Accepted for publication on 12. 04. 2016 Judit Farkas1 Gábor Alberti2 1Hungarian Academy of Sciences 2University of Pécs Positions for oblique case-marked arguments in Hungarian noun phrases1 We argue that there are four positions open to oblique case-marked arguments within the Hungarian noun phrase structure, of which certain ones have never been mentioned in the literature while even the others have been discussed very scarcely (for different reasons, which are also pointed out in the paper). In order to formally account for these four positions and the data “legitimizing” them, we provide a new DP structure integrating the basically morphology-based Hungarian traditions with the cartographic Split-DP Hypothesis (Giusti 1996; Ihsane and Puskás 2001). We point out that, chiefly by means of the four posi- tions for oblique case-marked arguments in Hungarian noun phrases and the operator layers based upon them, this language makes it possible for its speakers to explicitly express every possible scopal order of arguments of verbs, even if the given verbs are deeply embedded in complements of deverbal nominalizers. Key words: Hungarian noun phrase; generative syntax; Split-DP Hypothesis; oblique case-marked arguments; possessive construction. 1 We are grateful to OTKA NK 100804 (Comprehensive Grammar Resources: Hungarian) for their financial support. The present scientific contribution is dedicated to the 650th anniversary of the foundation of the University of Pécs, Hungary. 295 Judit Farkas – Gábor Alberti: Positions for obliques case-marked arguments in Hungarian noun phrases 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Noun Phrase
    Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia Facoltà di Lingue e Letterature Straniere Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Scienze del Linguaggio The Finnish Noun Phrase Relatore: Prof.ssa Giuliana Giusti Correlatore: Prof. Guglielmo Cinque Laureanda: Lena Dal Pozzo Matricola: 803546 ANNO ACCADEMICO: 2006/2007 A mia madre Table of contents Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………….…….…… III Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………........ V Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………VII 1. Word order in Finnish …………………………………………………………………1 1.1 The order of constituents in the clause …………………………………………...2 1.2 Word order and interpretation .......……………………………………………… 8 1.3 The order of constituents in the Nominal Expression ………………………… 11 1.3.1. Determiners and Possessors …………………………………………………12 1.3.2. Adjectives and other modifiers …………………………………………..… 17 1.3.2.1 Adjectival hierarchy…………………………………………………………23 1.3.2.2 Predicative structures and complements …………………………………26 1.3.3 Relative clauses …………………………………………………………….... 28 1.4 Conclusions ............……………………………………………………………. 30 2. Thematic relations in nominal expressions ……………………………………….. 32 2.1 Observations on Argument Structure ………………………………….……. 32 2.1.1 Result and Event nouns…………………………………………………… 36 2.2 Transitive nouns ………………………………………………………………... 38 2.2.1 Compound nouns ……………….……………………………………... 40 2.2.2 Intransitive nouns derived from transitive verbs …………………… 41 2.3 Passive nouns …………………………………………………………………… 42 2.4 Psychological predicates ……………………………………………………….. 46 2.4.1 Psych verbs ……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Linguistics Society
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 7-8, 2015 General Session Special Session Fieldwork Methodology Editors Anna E. Jurgensen Hannah Sande Spencer Lamoureux Kenny Baclawski Alison Zerbe Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright c 2015 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0363-2946 LCCN: 76-640143 Contents Acknowledgments . v Foreword . vii The No Blur Principle Effects as an Emergent Property of Language Systems Farrell Ackerman, Robert Malouf . 1 Intensification and sociolinguistic variation: a corpus study Andrea Beltrama . 15 Tagalog Sluicing Revisited Lena Borise . 31 Phonological Opacity in Pendau: a Local Constraint Conjunction Analysis Yan Chen . 49 Proximal Demonstratives in Predicate NPs Ryan B . Doran, Gregory Ward . 61 Syntax of generic null objects revisited Vera Dvořák . 71 Non-canonical Noun Incorporation in Bzhedug Adyghe Ksenia Ershova . 99 Perceptual distribution of merging phonemes Valerie Freeman . 121 Second Position and “Floating” Clitics in Wakhi Zuzanna Fuchs . 133 Some causative alternations in K’iche’, and a unified syntactic derivation John Gluckman . 155 The ‘Whole’ Story of Partitive Quantification Kristen A . Greer . 175 A Field Method to Describe Spontaneous Motion Events in Japanese Miyuki Ishibashi . 197 i On the Derivation of Relative Clauses in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec Nick Kalivoda, Erik Zyman . 219 Gradability and Mimetic Verbs in Japanese: A Frame-Semantic Account Naoki Kiyama, Kimi Akita . 245 Exhaustivity, Predication and the Semantics of Movement Peter Klecha, Martina Martinović . 267 Reevaluating the Diphthong Mergers in Japono-Ryukyuan Tyler Lau .
    [Show full text]
  • A Few Comments on the Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian Adjectival Declension and the Pronoun *Tos
    07. Res Balticae 13_Layout 1 26/09/2013 17:38 Pagina 91 A FEW COMMENTS ON THE BALTO-SLAVIC AND INDO-IRANIAN ADJECTIVAL DECLENSION AND THE PRONOUN *TOS WILLIAM R. S CHMALSTIEG State College, Pennsylvania [email protected] In this article I start from the assumption that the Indo-European case system was gradually created over a period of time and that the more deve loped systems of Indo-Iranian and Balto-Slavic are innovations. According to Lehmann (1958, 182): “The cases expressing adverbial relationships (in - strumental, dative, ablative, locative and the genitive in some uses) are late...”. 1 He writes further (1958, 202) that the original cases must have been nominative, accusative, genitive and vocative. I subscribe to Leh mann’s view but in place of the term accusative I would use the term ad verbial to describe a case which functioned with meanings which we have become accustomed to calling dative, instrumental, locative and accusative. Rather than assuming deletions performed on morphemic monsters I assume accretions of minimorphemes, the vowels *- i(-) and *- u(-), the con sonants *- s(-), *- m(-), and in Indo-Iranian *- bh (-). (I should mention the no tion that Balto-Slavic and Germanic *- m- < *- bh , see Leskien (1876, 101) and Martinet (1986, 172), although I don’t necessarily support this view). In other words I would assume that the development of the pre historic system was similar to that observed in the creation of the new cases in the Baltic languages, as illustrated by the following Lithuanian examples: the illative (e.g., miškañ ‘into the forest’ < acc.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian and Latvian Verb Government Comparison
    TARTU UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF ESTONIAN AND GENERAL LINGUISTICS DEPARTMENT OF ESTONIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE Miķelis Zeibārts ESTONIAN AND LATVIAN VERB GOVERNMENT COMPARISON Master thesis Supervisor Dr. phil Valts Ernštreits and co-supervisor Mg. phil Ilze Tālberga Tartu 2017 Table of contents Preface ............................................................................................................................... 5 1. Method of research .................................................................................................... 8 2. Description of research sources and theoretical literature ......................................... 9 2.1. Research sources ................................................................................................ 9 2.2. Theoretical literature ........................................................................................ 10 3. Theoretical research background ............................................................................. 12 3.1. Cases in Estonian and Latvian .......................................................................... 12 3.1.1. Estonian noun cases .................................................................................. 12 3.1.2. Latvian noun cases .................................................................................... 13 3.2. The differences and similarities between Estonian and Latvian cases ............. 14 3.2.1. The differences between Estonian and Latvian case systems ................... 14 3.2.2. The similarities
    [Show full text]
  • Syntax of Hungarian. Nouns and Noun Phrases, Volume 2
    Comprehensive Grammar Resources Series editors: Henk van Riemsdijk, István Kenesei and Hans Broekhuis Syntax of Hungarian Nouns and Noun Phrases Volume 2 Edited by Gábor Alberti and Tibor Laczkó Syntax of Hungarian Nouns and Noun Phrases Volume II Comprehensive Grammar Resources With the rapid development of linguistic theory, the art of grammar writing has changed. Modern research on grammatical structures has tended to uncover many constructions, many in depth properties, many insights that are generally not found in the type of grammar books that are used in schools and in fields related to linguistics. The new factual and analytical body of knowledge that is being built up for many languages is, unfortunately, often buried in articles and books that concentrate on theoretical issues and are, therefore, not available in a systematized way. The Comprehensive Grammar Resources (CGR) series intends to make up for this lacuna by publishing extensive grammars that are solidly based on recent theoretical and empirical advances. They intend to present the facts as completely as possible and in a way that will “speak” to modern linguists but will also and increasingly become a new type of grammatical resource for the semi- and non- specialist. Such grammar works are, of necessity, quite voluminous. And compiling them is a huge task. Furthermore, no grammar can ever be complete. Instead new subdomains can always come under scientific scrutiny and lead to additional volumes. We therefore intend to build up these grammars incrementally, volume by volume. In view of the encyclopaedic nature of grammars, and in view of the size of the works, adequate search facilities must be provided in the form of good indices and extensive cross-referencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammatical Case in Estonian
    Grammatical Case in Estonian Merilin Miljan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh September 2008 Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is of my own composition, and that it contains no material previously submitted for the award of any other degree. The work reported in this thesis has been executed by myself, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. Merilin Miljan ii Abstract The aim of this thesis is to show that standard approaches to grammatical case fail to provide an explanatory account of such cases in Estonian. In Estonian, grammatical cases form a complex system of semantic contrasts, with the case-marking on nouns alternating with each other in certain constructions, even though the apparent grammatical functions of the noun phrases themselves are not changed. This thesis demonstrates that such alternations, and the differences in interpretation which they induce, are context dependent. This means that the semantic contrasts which the alternating grammatical cases express are available in some linguistic contexts and not in others, being dependent, among other factors, on the semantics of the case- marked noun and the semantics of the verb it occurs with. Hence, traditional approaches which treat grammatical case as markers of syntactic dependencies and account for associated semantic interpretations by matching cases directly to semantics not only fall short in predicting the distribution of cases in Estonian but also result in over-analysis due to the static nature of the theories which the standard approach to case marking comprises.
    [Show full text]