DOCSLIB.ORG

The War of 1812 TEKS 5A, 5C, 5D, 5E, 13A, 14B, If YOU Were There

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The War of 1812 TEKS 5A, 5C, 5D, 5E, 13A, 14B, If YOU Were There DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A SECTION 4 The War of 1812 TEKS 5A, 5C, 5D, 5E, 13A, 14B, If YOU were there... 20C, 22B It’s 1812, and the United States and Great Britain are at war. What You Will Learn… You are a sailor on an American merchant ship that has been Main Ideas licensed as a privateer. Your ship’s mission will be to chase and 1. American forces held their capture ships of the mighty British navy. Even with the help of mer- own against the British in chant ships like yours, the American navy is badly outnumbered. the early battles of the war. 2. U.S. forces stopped British You know you face danger and may not survive. offensives in the East and South. 3. The effects of the war included Do you think your mission will succeed? prosperity and national pride. The Big Idea Great Britain and the United BUILDING BACKGROUND Anger against Great Britain’s actions States went to battle in the finally provoked the United States into the War of 1812. Britain’s great War of 1812. navy gave it a clear advantage at sea, but the war was also fought on several other fronts. Victories in major battles along the frontier gave Key Terms and People Americans a new sense of unity. Oliver Hazard Perry, p. 285 Battle of Lake Erie, p. 285 Andrew Jackson, p. 286 Treaty of Fort Jackson, p. 286 Early Battles Battle of New Orleans, p. 286 In the summer of 1812 the United States found itself in a war with Hartford Convention, p. 287 one of the world’s most powerful nations. Despite the claims by the Treaty of Ghent, p. 287 War Hawks, the War of 1812 would not be a quick and easy fight. War at Sea When the war began, the British navy had hundreds of ships. In Use the graphic organizer online contrast, the U.S. Navy had fewer than 20 ships. None of them was to take notes on the sequence of as powerful as the greatest British warships. events in the War of 1812, from beginning to end. Most of the British navy’s ships, however, were scattered around the globe. Although small, the U.S. Navy had well-trained sailors and powerful new warships such as the USS Constitution. American vessels defeated British ships several times in one-on-one duels. Such victories embarrassed the British and raised American morale. Eventually, the British ships blockaded America’s seaports. Battles Along the Canadian Border American leaders hoped to follow up victories at sea with an overland invasion of Canada. Three attacks were planned—from Detroit, from Niagara Falls, and from up the Hudson River valley toward Montreal. 284 CHAPTER 8 DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A e The War of 1812 c n Disputed re aw L er ME BRITISH TERRITORY . iv t R (PART OF MA) Disputed Supe S ke rior La Montreal Plattsburg VT L ak e Lake NH ILLINOIS H u Ontario n r York Boston o TERRITORY a n g MA i Thames NY h Fort Niagara c American forces i MICHIGAN Lake Erie CT M RI e TERR. American victories k a Fort Detroit RY New York 40N L ER PA British forces P NJ City H HARRISON British victories U Philadelphia Fort L L Lake Baltimore British blockades Dearborn Erie DE Creek victory INDIANA OH Washington, TERRITORY D.C. MD 0 150 300 Miles 0 150 300 Kilometers VA KY 35N MISSOURI TERRITORY NC TN N JACKSON SC E Tallapoosa W MISSISSIPPI River S Horseshoe Bend HRW American History TERRITORY ah06se_c07map021a Alabama 30N River GA War of 1812 LA Fort 1ST revision: 5/2/05SPANISH Mims TERRITORY GEOGRAPHY Disputed ATLANTIC SPANISH SKILLS INTERPRETING MAPS New Orleans TERRITORY OCEAN 1. Location According to the map, what major southern port was affected by the British Gulf of 85W 75W blockade? Mexico 25N 2. Region Which battles took place in the 90W 80W Great Lakes region? The attack from Detroit failed when Brit- message to General William Henry Harrison: ish soldiers and Indians led by Tecumseh cap- “We have met the enemy and they are ours.” HRW American History ah06se_c07map021a tured Fort Detroit. The other American attacks Perry’s brilliant victory forced the British to War of 1812 2nd proof: 11/4/04 failed when state militia troops refused to withdraw, giving the U.S. Army control of Approved: 11/11/04 cross the Canadian border, arguing that they the lake and new hope. did not have to fight in a foreign country. With American control of Lake Erie estab- In 1813 the United States went on the lished, General Harrison marched his army attack again. A key goal was to break Britain’s into Canada. At the Battle of the Thames Riv- control of Lake Erie. The navy gave the task er in October 1813, he defeated a combined to Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry. After force of British troops and Native Americans. building a small fleet,Perry sailed out to Harrison’s victory ended British power in meet the British on September 10, beginning the Northwest. Tecumseh’s death during the the Battle of Lake Erie . The battle ended fighting also dealt a blow to the British alli- when the British surrendered. Perry sent a ance with Native Americans in the region. THE JEFFERSON ERA 285 DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A The Creek War worse. After defeating France in April 1814, Meanwhile, war with American Indians the British sent more troops to America. THE IMPACT erupted in the South. Creek Indians, angry British Attacks in the East TODAY at American settlers for pushing into their One witness to lands, took up arms in 1813. A large force Now reinforced, the British attacked Washing- the shelling was attacked Fort Mims on the Alabama River, ton, D.C. President Madison was forced to flee a lawyer named when the British broke through U.S. defenses. Francis Scott destroying the fort and killing close to 250 Key. He was so of its defenders. In response, the commander The British set fire to the White House, the inspired by what of the Tennessee militia, Andrew Jackson, Capitol, and other government buildings. he witnessed and The British sailed on to Baltimore, Mary- the Americans’ gathered about 2,000 volunteers to move land, which was guarded by Fort McHenry. refusal to surren- against the Creek nation. der that he wrote In the spring of 1814 Jackson attacked They shelled the fort for 25 hours. The Amer- the poem that icans refused to surrender Fort McHenry. The would become the Creek along the Tallapoosa River in Ala- British chose to retreat instead of continuing the song “The bama. Jackson’s troops won this battle, the Star-Spangled Battle of Horseshoe Bend. The Treaty of Fort to fight. Banner.” The Jackson, signed late in 1814, ended the Creek phrases “rockets’ The Battle of New Orleans red glare” and War and forced the Creek to give up millions After the attack on Washington, the British “bombs bursting of acres of their land. in air” describe moved against New Orleans. British com- the intense manders hoped to capture the city and thus shelling the fort READING CHECK Comparing What advan- endured. The tages did Great Britain and the United States have take control of the Mississippi River. bombing was so at the start of the war? Andrew Jackson commanded the U.S. heavy that it was forces around New Orleans. His troops were heard in Phila- delphia, 90 miles a mix of regular soldiers, including two away. The song Britain on the Offensive battalions of free African Americans, a group became the U.S. of Choctaw Indians, state militia, and pirates national anthem Despite U.S. success on the western and south- led by Jean Lafitte. in 1931. ern frontiers, the situation in the East grew The battle began on the morning of January 8, 1815. Some 5,300 British troops attacked Jackson’s force of about 4,500. The British began marching toward the U.S. First Lady Saves Washington’s Portrait defenses, but they were caught on an open field. The British were cut down with fright- ening speed. More than 2,000 British soldiers were killed or wounded. The Americans, for their part, had suffered about 70 casualties. The Battle of New Orleans made Andrew Jackson a hero and was the last major con- flict of the War of 1812. READING CHECK Finding Main Ideas Dolley Madison What happened at the Battle of New Orleans? refused to leave Washington, D.C., until a famous portrait of Effects of the War the first president was Before the battle of New Orleans, a group of saved from the execu- tive mansion. New England Federalists gathered secretly 286 DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A Analyzing the War of 1812 • Impressment of American sailors • Interference with American shipping • Increased sense of national pride • British military aid to Native Americans • American manufacturing boosted • Native American resistance weakened at Hartford, Connecticut. At the Hartford dence. The war also broke the power of many Convention, Federalists agreed to oppose the Native American groups. During the war, war and send delegates to meet with Congress. American manufacturers produced more to Before the delegates reached Washington, replace goods that could not be imported. however, news arrived that the war had ended. When the war ended and trade resumed, Some critics now laughed at the Federalists, American manufacturing grew even more as and the party lost much of its political power.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EXHIBIT a to KING DECLARATION: Second Amended Complaint
    Case 2:12-cv-01079-MHT-CSC Document 159-2 Filed 06/05/19 Page 1 of 80 EXHIBIT A TO KING DECLARATION: Second Amended Complaint Case 2:12-cv-01079-MHT-CSC Document 159-2 Filed 06/05/19 Page 2 of 80 The Honorable Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe, HICKORY GROUND TRIBAL TOWN, and MEKKO GEORGE THOMPSON, individually and as traditional 2:12-cv-1079-MHT-CSC representative of the lineal descendants of those buried at Hickory Ground Tribal Town in Wetumpka, Alabama. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND Plaintiffs, SUPPLEMENTAL v. COMPLAINT POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, a federally recognized tribe; STEPHANIE A. BRYAN, individually and in her official capacity as Chair of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (“Poarch”) Tribal Council; ROBERT R. MCGHEE, individually and in his official capacity as Vice Chair of Poarch Tribal Council; EDDIE L. TULLIS, individually and in his official capacity as Treasurer of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; CHARLOTTE MECKEL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; DEWITT CARTER, in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; SANDY HOLLINGER, individually and in her official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; KEITH MARTIN, individually and in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; ARTHUR MOTHERSHED, individually and in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; GARVIS SELLS, individually and in his official capacity as At Large member of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council; BUFORD ROLIN, an individual; DAVID GEHMAN, an individual; LARRY HAIKEY, in his official capacity as Acting Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Historic Preservation Officer; PCI GAMING AUTHORITY d/b/a WIND CREEK HOSPITALITY; WESTLY L.
    [Show full text]
  • PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS
    'l PETITION rOR,RECOGNITION OF THE FLORIDA TRIBE or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS TH;: FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS and the Administra­ tive Council, THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA CREEK INDIAN COUNCIL brings this, thew petition to the DEPARTMENT Or THE INTERIOR OF THE FEDERAL GOVERN- MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and prays this honorable nation will honor their petition, which is a petition for recognition by this great nation that THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is an Indian Tribe. In support of this plea for recognition THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS herewith avers: (1) THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS nor any of its members, is the subject of Congressional legislation which has expressly terminated or forbidden the Federal relationship sought. (2) The membership of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is composed principally of persons who are not members of any other North American Indian tribe. (3) A list of all known current members of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS, based on the tribes acceptance of these members and the tribes own defined membership criteria is attached to this petition and made a part of it. SEE APPENDIX----- A The membership consists of individuals who are descendants of the CREEK NATION which existed in aboriginal times, using and occuping this present georgraphical location alone, and in conjunction with other people since that time. - l - MNF-PFD-V001-D0002 Page 1of4 (4) Attached herewith and made a part of this petition is the present governing Constitution of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEKS INDIANS.
    [Show full text]
  • Available to Download
    A Desert Between Us & Them INTRODUCTION The activities and projects in this guide have been developed to compliment the themes of the A Desert Between Us & Them documentary series. These ideas are meant to be an inspiration for teachers and students to become engaged with the material, exercise their creative instincts, and empower their critical thinking. You will be able to adapt the activities and projects based on the grade level and readiness of your students. The International Society for Technology in Education (http://www.iste.org) sets out standards for students to “learn effectively and live productively in an increasingly global and digital world.” These standards, as described in the following pages, were used to develop the activities and projects in this guide. The Ontario Visual Heritage Project offers robust resources on the A Desert Between Us & Them website http://1812.visualheritage.ca. There is a link to additional A Desert Between Us & Them stories posted on our YouTube Channel, plus the new APP for the iPad, iPhone and iPod. A Desert Between Us & Them is one in a series of documentaries produced by the Ontario Visual Heritage Project about Ontario’s history. Find out more at www.visualheritage.ca. HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS GUIDE In this guide, you will find a complete transcript of each episode of A Desert Between Us & Them. The transcripts are broken down into chapters, which correspond with the chapters menus on the DVD. Notable details are highlighted in orange, which may dovetail with some of the projects and activities that you have already planned for your course unit.
    [Show full text]
  • River Raisin National Battlefield Park Lesson Plan Template
    River Raisin National Battlefield Park 3rd to 5th Grade Lesson Plans Unit Title: “It’s Not My Fault”: Engaging Point of View and Historical Perspective through Social Media – The War of 1812 Battles of the River Raisin Overview: This collection of four lessons engage students in learning about the War of 1812. Students will use point of view and historical perspective to make connections to American history and geography in the Old Northwest Territory. Students will learn about the War of 1812 and study personal stories of the Battles of the River Raisin. Students will read and analyze informational texts and explore maps as they organize information. A culminating project will include students making a fake social networking page where personalities from the Battles will interact with one another as the students apply their learning in fun and engaging ways. Topic or Era: War of 1812 and Battles of River Raisin, United States History Standard Era 3, 1754-1820 Curriculum Fit: Social Studies and English Language Arts Grade Level: 3rd to 5th Grade (can be used for lower graded gifted and talented students) Time Required: Four to Eight Class Periods (3 to 6 hours) Lessons: 1. “It’s Not My Fault”: Point of View and Historical Perspective 2. “It’s Not My Fault”: Battle Perspectives 3. “It’s Not My Fault”: Character Analysis and Jigsaw 4. “It’s Not My Fault”: Historical Conversations Using Social Media Lesson One “It’s Not My Fault!”: Point of View and Historical Perspective Overview: This lesson provides students with background information on point of view and perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw and Creek Removals
    Chapter 6 Choctaw and Creek Removals The idea of indian removal as a government obligation first reared its head in 1802 when officials of the state of Georgia made an agreement with federal government officials. In the Georgia Compact, the state of Georgia gave up its claims to territorial lands west of that state in exchange for $1,250,000 and a promise that the federal government would abolish Indian title to Georgia lands as soon as possible. How seriously the government took its obligation to Georgia at the time of the agreement is unknown. The following year, however, the Louisiana Purchase was made, and almost immedi- ately, the trans-Mississippi area was seen by some as the answer to “The Indian Problem.” Not everyone agreed. Some congress- men argued that removal to the West was impractical because of land-hungry whites who could not be restrained from crossing the mighty river to obtain land. Although their conclusion was correct, it was probably made more in opposition to President Jefferson than from any real con- cern about the Indians or about practicality. Although some offers were made by government officials to officials of various tribes, little Pushmataha, Choctaw was done about removing the southeastern tribes before the War of 1812. warrior During that war several Indian tribes supported the British. After the war ended, many whites demanded that tribal lands be confiscated by Removals 67 the government as punishment for Indians’ treasonous activities. Many Americans included all tribes in their confiscationdemands , evidently feeling that all Indians were guilty, despite the fact that many tribes did not participate in the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge Bowl 2020
    Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide
    S u sq u eh a n n a 1 Westminster R 40 r e iv v e i r 272 R 15 anal & Delaware C 70 ke Chesapea cy a Northeast River c o Elk River n 140 Havre de Chesapeake o 97 Grace City 49 M 26 40 Susquehanna 213 32 Flats 301 13 795 95 1 r e Liberty Reservoir v i R Frederick h 26 s 9 u B 695 Elk River G 70 u 340 n Sa p ssaf 695 rass 83 o Riv w er r e d 40 e v i r R R Baltimore i 13 95 v e r y M c i 213 a dd c le o B R n 70 ac iv o k e R r M 270 iv e 301 r P o to m ac 15 ster Che River 95 P 32 a R t i v a 9 e r p Chestertown 695 s 13 co R 20 1 i 213 300 1 ve r 100 97 Rock Hall 8 Leesburg 97 177 213 Dover 2 301 r ive r R e 32 iv M R 7 a r k got n hy te Ri s a v t 95 er e 295 h r p 189 S e o e C v 313 h ve i r C n R R e iv o er h 13 ka 267 495 uc 113 T Whitehall Bay Bay Bridge 50 495 Greensboro 193 495 Queen Milford Anne 7 14 50 Selby 404 Harrington Bay 1 14 Denton 66 4 113 y P 258 a a B t u rn 404 x te 66 Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport
    The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport The Last Battle of the Revolution Less than a quarter of a century after the close of the American Revolution, Great Britain and the United States were again in conflict. Britain and her allies were engaged in a long war with Napoleonic France. The shipping-related industries of the neutral United States benefited hugely, conducting trade with both sides. Hundreds of ships, built in yards on America’s Atlantic coast and manned by American sailors, carried goods, including foodstuffs and raw materials, to Europe and the West Indies. Merchants and farmers alike reaped the profits. In Cambridge, men made plans to profit from this brisk trade. “[T]he soaring hopes of expansionist-minded promoters and speculators in Cambridge were based solidly on the assumption that the economic future of Cambridge rested on its potential as a shipping center.” The very name, Cambridgeport, reflected “the expectation that several miles of waterfront could be developed into a port with an intricate system of canals.” In January 1805, Congress designated Cambridge as a “port of delivery” and “canal dredging began [and] prices of dock lots soared." [1] Judge Francis Dana, a lawyer, diplomat, and Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, was one of the primary investors in the development of Cambridgeport. He and his large family lived in a handsome mansion on what is now Dana Hill. Dana lost heavily when Jefferson declared an embargo in 1807. Britain and France objected to America’s commercial relationship with their respective enemies and took steps to curtail trade with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Maiden National Historic Park Amherstburg, Ontario Canada
    Fort Maiden National Historic Park Amherstburg, Ontario Canada A WISE NATION PRESERVES ITS RECORDS GATHERS UP ITS MUNIMENTS DECORATES THE TOMBS OF ITS ILLUS­ TRIOUS DEAD REPAIRS ITS GREAT PUBLIC STRUCTURES AND FOSTERS NA­ TIONAL PRIDE AND LOVE OF COUNTRY BY PERPETUAL REFERENCE TO THE SACRIFICES AND GLORIES OF THE PAST. Joseph Howe Issued under the authority of THE HONOURABLE JEAN LESAGE, Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources Interior of Museum, Fort Maiden National Historic Park Fort Maiden National Historic Park Amherstburg—Ontario ORT MALDEN NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK, Amherstburg, Ontario, is situated F on the east bank of the Detroit River and is easily accessible from the cities of Windsor and Detroit, distant eighteen miles to the north. The Park contains part of the remaining earthworks of Fort Maiden, and on the grounds stands a fireproof museum built in 1939. An adjoining property was purchased in 1946 to allow expansion of the Park facilities. Fort Maiden was built in 1797-99 by the Second Battalion of the Royal Can­ adian Volunteers, under Captain Hector McLean, to replace Fort Lernoult at Detroit, one of the posts evacuated by the British in 1796 as a result of the Jay Treaty. The town of Amherstburg came into existence at the same time, a portion of the Military Reserve being laid out as a townsite. As the successor to Fort Lernoult at Detroit, which in turn had replaced the old French fort of Pontchartrain, Maiden fell heir to a history going back more than two centuries. Sanson's Map of New France, 1650, gives details of the region and it is generally believed that the information it contains was furnished by Father Bre- beuf.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscogee Or Creek Indians. Letter from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, in Reference to the Affairs of the Creek Indians
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 1-17-1853 Muscogee or Creek Indians. Letter from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, in reference to the affairs of the Creek Indians Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Misc. Doc. No. 10, 32nd Congress, 2nd Sess. (1853) This House Miscellaneous Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 32d CoNGREss, [HO. OF REPS.] J.\'frsCELLANEOUS, 2d Session. No. 10. ~IUSCOGEE OR CREEK INDIANS. LETTER J.'ROI\1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, In reference to the affairs cf the Creek Indians. J.L'IUARY 17, 1853.-0rdered to be printed. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Office Indian Affairs, January 17, 1853. SIR: I have the honor to communicate the information desired by you in your letter of the 28th ultimo, respecting the origin and history of the claim of the Creek nation for compensation for the lands talen from the "friendly Creeks," by the treaty of Fort Jackson, made on the 8th of August, 1814. In 1813 a portion of the "upper Creeks" commenced a civil war against the "lower Creeks," and those of their own people \vho were friendly to the whites, and also commenced hostilities against the neighboring white settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-8-2020 "The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812 Joseph R. Miller University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Joseph R., ""The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3208. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3208 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THE MEN WERE SICK OF THE PLACE”: SOLDIER ILLNESS AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE WAR OF 1812 By Joseph R. Miller B.A. North Georgia University, 2003 M.A. University of Maine, 2012 A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Liam Riordan, Professor of History Kathryn Shively, Associate Professor of History, Virginia Commonwealth University James Campbell, Professor of Joint, Air War College, Brigadier General (ret) Michael Robbins, Associate Research Professor of Psychology Copyright 2020 Joseph R.
    [Show full text]