DOCSLIB.ORG

DEFRA Blanket Bog Review V021107

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEFRA Blanket Bog Review V021107 Review of Blanket Bog Management and Restoration TECHNICAL REPORT TO DEFRA PROJECT No. CTE0513 H O’Brien, J C Labadz & D P Butcher Nottingham Trent University School of Animal Rural & Environmental Sciences Brackenhurst Southwell NG25 0QF [email protected] 01636 817017 April 2007 CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................ 9 1.1 Principal Aims.................................................................................. 9 1.2 Objectives....................................................................................... 9 2 Methodology ......................................................................................... 10 2.1 Published Literature ....................................................................... 10 2.2 Grey Literature .............................................................................. 10 2.3 Interviews..................................................................................... 10 3 Blanket Bog: Definition, Classification and Characteristics........................... 12 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 12 3.2 Definition of Blanket Bog ................................................................ 12 3.3 Classification of Blanket Bogs .......................................................... 14 3.4 Blanket Bog Formation ................................................................... 16 3.5 Hydrology of Blanket Bogs .............................................................. 18 3.5.1 Infiltration and infiltration-excess overland flow.............................. 19 3.5.2 Saturation-excess overland flow ................................................... 20 3.5.3 Pipe flow and macropore flow....................................................... 20 3.5.4 Subsurface flow through the peat matrix ....................................... 21 3.5.5 Runoff generation in blanket bogs ................................................ 21 3.6 Peat Accumulation ......................................................................... 22 3.7 The Age and Origin of Blanket Bog in the British Isles......................... 23 3.8 UK Distribution of Blanket Bog......................................................... 24 3.9 UK Status – Protection and Designation ............................................ 25 3.10 Common Standards Monitoring and Condition Assessment .................. 26 3.10.1 Common Standards Monitoring ................................................ 26 3.10.2 Condition Assessment............................................................. 27 4 Management and Values of Blanket Bog ................................................... 28 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 28 4.2 The Value of Peatlands ................................................................... 28 4.3 Ecosystem Services of Blanket Bog .................................................... 29 4.3.1 Regeneration and Production Services of Blanket Bog ........................ 30 4.3.1.1 Production: Harvesting of Peat for Fuel....................................... 30 4.3.1.2 Production: Forestry................................................................. 31 4.3.1.3 Production: Grazing for Livestock............................................... 32 4.3.1.4 Production: Grouse Shooting ..................................................... 33 4.3.2 Regulation and Stabilsation Services of Blanket Bog .......................... 33 4.3.2.1Physical and Hydrological Function.............................................. 33 4.3.2.2 Potable Water Supply and Water Quality..................................... 34 4.3.3 Habitat Provision Services of Blanket Bog ...................................... 35 4.3.3.1 Wildlife Conservation Value ....................................................... 35 4.3.4 Cycling Services of Blanket Bog: Carbon Sequestration ...................... 35 4.3.5 Information/Life fulfilling Services of Blanket Bog ........................... 38 4.3.5.1 Landscape, Culture and Education Values ................................... 38 4.3.5.2 Visitor Access .......................................................................... 38 4.3.6 Purification and Detoxification ..................................................... 39 5 Blanket Bog Management and Causes of Degradation ................................ 40 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 40 5.2 Measurement of Blanket Bog Degradation......................................... 40 5.3 Causes of Blanket Bog Degradation – Natural Factors......................... 43 5.3.1 Wind Action ............................................................................... 43 5.3.2 Frost Action ............................................................................... 43 5.3.3 Drought .................................................................................... 44 5.3.4 Flowing Water ............................................................................ 46 5.3.4.1 Gully Erosion........................................................................... 47 5.3.5 Climate Change.......................................................................... 48 5.4 Causes of Blanket Bog Degradation Associated with Land Use and Management............................................................................................ 49 5.4.1 Controlled Burning...................................................................... 53 2 5.4.1.1 Methods of Controlled Burning................................................... 53 5.4.1.2 Guidelines for Controlled Burning on Blanket Bog......................... 54 5.4.1.3 Extent of Controlled Burning on Blanket Bog ............................... 56 5.4.1.4 Impact of Controlled Burning on Blanket Bog .............................. 56 5.4.2 Accidental or Wildfires................................................................. 60 5.4.3 Livestock Grazing ....................................................................... 61 5.4.3.1 Overgrazing ............................................................................ 61 5.4.3.2 Cattle .................................................................................... 66 5.4.4 Drainage (Gripping) .................................................................... 67 5.4.4.1 Effects of Drainage (Gripping) on Vegetation............................... 71 5.4.5 Afforestation .............................................................................. 73 5.4.6 Liming and Fertiliser ...................................................................... 76 5.4.7 Recreation ................................................................................. 78 6 Restoration of Blanket Bog...................................................................... 80 6.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 80 6.2 Blanket Bog Restoration ................................................................. 81 6.2.1 Objectives of Blanket Bog Restoration ........................................... 81 6.2.2 Principles of Blanket Bog Restoration ............................................ 81 6.3 Restoration of hydrological function.................................................. 84 6.3.1 Grip/Drain blocking........................................................................ 85 6.3.1.1 Methods of Grip Blocking .......................................................... 85 6.3.1.2 Results of Grip Blocking ............................................................ 93 6.3.2 “Natural” Gully blocking............................................................... 96 6.4 Re-vegetation of bare ground .........................................................100 6.4.1 Lime and Fertiliser Applications ...................................................104 6.4.2 Sphagnum re vegetation .............................................................106 6.5 Prescribed burning ........................................................................108 6.6 Grazing .......................................................................................109 6.7 Mitigation of Forestry Practices and Restoration of Afforested Sites .....111 6.8 Recreation ...................................................................................113 6.9 Agri-Environment Schemes and Policy .............................................114 7 Quanlitative Analysis and Evaluation of Interviews ....................................115 7.1 Introduction ......................................................................................115 7.2 The Definition of Blanket Bog and its Condition.................................116 7.3 The Value of Blanket Bog ...............................................................117 7.4 Threats to Blanket Bog ..................................................................119 7.5 Influence over Threats to Blanket Bog .............................................123 7.6 The Restoration of Blanket Bog.......................................................125 7.7 The Restoration of Hydrological Function and Appropriate Techniques .127 7.8 The Monitoring of Land Management and Restoration ........................128 7.9 Raising Awareness and Publicity .....................................................130 7.10 Knowledge Gaps and Future
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA April 24, 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes ............................................................................................................................................4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes .................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ............................................................................................. 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers .................................................................... 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ...................................................................................................................... 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers.................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure .............................................................................................................................. 30 PG05 – Scie nt if ic Spec ies Code .................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    3.2 Grazing animals used in projects 3.2.1 Species of gradng animals Some sites utilised more than one species of grazing animals so the results in Table 5 are based on 182 records. The majority of sites used sheep and/or cattle and these species were used on an almost equal number of sites, Ponies were also widely used but horses and goats were used infrequently and pigs were used on just 2 sites. No other species of grazing livestock was recorded (a mention of rabbits was taken to refer to wild populations). Table 5. Species of livestock used for grazing Sheep Cattle Equines Goats Pigs Number of Sites 71 72 30 7 2 Percentage of Records 39 40 16 4 I 3.2.2 Breeds of Sheep The breeds and crosses of sheep used are shown in Table 6. A surprisingly large number of 46 breeds or crosses were used on the 71 sites; the majority can be considered as commercial, although hardy, native breeds or crosses including hill breeds such as Cheviot, Derbyshire Gritstone, Herdwick, Scottish Blackface, Swaledale and Welsh Mountain, grassland breeds such as Beulah Speckled Face, Clun Forest, Jacob and Lleyn and down breeds such as Dorset (it was not stated whether this was Dorset Down or Dorset Horn), Hampshire Down and Southdown. Continental breeds were represented by Benichon du Cher, Bleu du Maine and Texel. Rare breeds (i.e. those included on the Rare Breeds Survival Trust’s priority and minority lists) were well represented by Hebridean, Leicester Longwool, Manx Loghtan, Portland, Shetland, Soay, Southdown, Teeswater and Wiltshire Horn.
    [Show full text]
  • St.Kilda Soay Sheep & Mouse Projects
    ST. KILDA SOAY SHEEP & MOUSE PROJECTS: ANNUAL REPORT 2009 J.G. Pilkington 1, S.D. Albon 2, A. Bento 4, D. Beraldi 1, T. Black 1, E. Brown 6, D. Childs 6, T.H. Clutton-Brock 3, T. Coulson 4, M.J. Crawley 4, T. Ezard 4, P. Feulner 6, A. Graham 10 , J. Gratten 6, A. Hayward 1, S. Johnston 6, P. Korsten 1, L. Kruuk 1, A.F. McRae 9, B. Morgan 7, M. Morrissey 1, S. Morrissey 1, F. Pelletier 4, J.M. Pemberton 1, 6 6 8 9 10 1 M.R. Robinson , J. Slate , I.R. Stevenson , P. M. Visscher , K. Watt , A. Wilson , K. Wilson 5. 1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen. 3Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge. 4Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College. 5Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster University. 6 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield. 7 Institute of Maths and Statistics, University of Kent at Canterbury. 8Sunadal Data Solutions, Edinburgh. 9Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia. 10 Institute of Immunity and Infection research, University of Edinburgh POPULATION OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 1 REPORTS ON COMPONENT STUDIES .................................................................................................................... 4 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Weather during population
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Innovation in Livestock Genetics in Scotland: an Agricultural Innovation Systems Perspective
    Dynamics of Innovation in Livestock Genetics in Scotland: An Agricultural Innovation Systems Perspective Md. Mofakkarul. Islam 1, Alan Renwick 2, Chrysa Lamprinopoulou-Kranis 3, Laurens Klerkx 4 1Scottish Agricultural College (SAC), UK [email protected] 2Scottish Agricultural College (SAC), UK [email protected] 3Scottish Agricultural College (SAC), UK [email protected] 4Wageningen University, Netherlands [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the 131st EAAE Seminar ‘Innovation for Agricultural Competitiveness and Sustainability of Rural Areas’, Prague, Czech Republic, September 18-19, 2012 Copyright 2012 by Islam, M. M., Renwick, A., Lamprinopoulou-Kranis, C., and Klerkx, L. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Dynamics of Innovation in Livestock Genetics in Scotland: An Agricultural Innovation Systems Perspective Md. Mofakkarul Islam, Alan Renwick, Chrysa Lamprinopoulou-Kranis, Laurens Klerkx Abstract: The application of genetic selection technologies in livestock breeding offers unique opportunities to enhance the productivity, profitability, and competitiveness of the livestock industry in Scotland. However, there is a concern that the uptake of these technologies has been slower in the sheep and beef sectors in comparison to the dairy, pig and poultry sectors. This is rather paradoxical given the fact that Scotland’s research outputs in farm animal genetics are widely perceived to be excellent. A growing body of literature, popularly known as Innovation Systems theories, suggests that technological transformations require a much broader approach that transcends formal research establishments. Accordingly, this paper reports on preliminary work exploring whether and how an agricultural innovation systems perspective could help identify the dynamics of technology uptake in the livestock sectors in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    "First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources" (SoWAnGR) Country Report of the United Kingdom to the FAO Prepared by the National Consultative Committee appointed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Contents: Executive Summary List of NCC Members 1 Assessing the state of agricultural biodiversity in the farm animal sector in the UK 1.1. Overview of UK agriculture. 1.2. Assessing the state of conservation of farm animal biological diversity. 1.3. Assessing the state of utilisation of farm animal genetic resources. 1.4. Identifying the major features and critical areas of AnGR conservation and utilisation. 1.5. Assessment of Animal Genetic Resources in the UK’s Overseas Territories 2. Analysing the changing demands on national livestock production & their implications for future national policies, strategies & programmes related to AnGR. 2.1. Reviewing past policies, strategies, programmes and management practices (as related to AnGR). 2.2. Analysing future demands and trends. 2.3. Discussion of alternative strategies in the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 2.4. Outlining future national policy, strategy and management plans for the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 3. Reviewing the state of national capacities & assessing future capacity building requirements. 3.1. Assessment of national capacities 4. Identifying national priorities for the conservation and utilisation of AnGR. 4.1. National cross-cutting priorities 4.2. National priorities among animal species, breeds,
    [Show full text]
  • Unworked Crofts in His Article in This Issue of the Crofter
    Scottish Crofting Federation THE CROFTER rooted in our communities SCF is the only organisation solely dedicated to campaigning for crofters and fighting for the future of crofting NOVEMBER 2017 Number 113 Conflict between two endangered species: crofters and geese © Martin Benson – Skye HE UISTS HAVE had a problem with wild population returns to its former numbers. crofters on the machair. And the geese seem to geese damaging crops and grazings for The barnacle population in Uist is escalating. be winning.” Tmany years now. Last year it was 4,000, this year 8,000, next SCF has been fighting for the control of wild The main culprit was the greylag but this is year? It has been predicted that if they are not geese on croft land for many years, with a petition now being overtaken by the Greenland barnacle controlled now, crofting will stop within 10 years. in the Scottish Parliament urging the government goose. The greylags were fairly well controlled in The repercussions will last for generations, to not cut the budget, and the goose issue being an adaptive management pilot scheme run by with some of Europe’s finest high nature value regularly brought to the Cross Party Group on SNH but, despite its success, the scheme has farmland, the esteemed machair habitat, being Crofting. This parliamentary group recently wrote closed. Was this a good investment of £294,858 left to degenerate. As SCF chair Russell Smith to cabinet secretary for environment Roseanna public money? Yes, if you look at the success; no, said recently, “We have a conflict between two if the scheme does not continue and the greylag endangered species – barnacle geese and ...Continued on page 3 Scottish upland sheep INSIDE THIS ISSUE • Crofting law support shenanigans consultation HE SCOTTISH UPLAND differential needed for those crofting to actual replacements.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 Conservation Value of Scrub
    ••••••. a a a a a= 11111. a a aaaalaaaa JNCC Report No 308 The nature conservation value of scrub in Britain SR Mortimer.. AJ Turner' VK Brown', RJ Fuller'. JEG Goods SA Bell'. PA Stevens'. D Norris', N Bayfieldn, & LK Ward' August 2000 This report should be cited as: Mortimer. SR. Turner. Al. Brown, VIC,Fuller, RJ, Good. JEG, Bell, SA. Stevens. PA. Norris. D. Bayfield. N & Ward, LK 2000. TI The nature conservation value of scrub in Britain. JNCC Report No. 308. JNCC. Peterborough 2000 For further information please contact: Habitats Advice Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House. City Road. Peterborough PEI HY. UK ISSN 0963-8091 CYNCOI cm' CWLAD SCOTTISH CYMRU N=77-",\! NATURAL COUNMSIDI HERITAGE COUNCII Mt WU It ENGLISH NATURE 0-4^70, This report was produced as a result of a commission research contract for English Nature with contributions from Scottish Nature Heritage and the Countryside Council for Wales CABI Bioseienee, Sik%ilod Park. A.eoi. Berks. SI.5 7TA 1- British Trust I-or Ornitholouy. The Nunnery. Thcilord. :Sorkin:. IP24 2PU Centre lor EcoioL:y and Hydoilou . Demo! 12ikid. Bangor. Gviy nedd. LL.57 2U1' II Centre tor licidoey and Ilydroloy. I lill uI Brathens. Glasse!. Banchory. Kincardineshire AB3 I 413Y + 53 Nide, Avenue. Sandtord. Wareham. Dorset. 131120 7AS 1 JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE: REPORT DISTRIBUTION Report number 308 Report title: The nature conservation value of scrub Contract number: FIN/CON/VT998 Nominated Officer Jeanette Hall. Woodland Network Liaison Officer Date received: April 20110 Contract title: A review of the nature conservation value of scrub in the UK Contractors: CABI Bioscience.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds
    NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY ARCHIVED FILE Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. This file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Content may not appear in full or in its original format. All links external to the document have been deactivated. For additional information, see http://pubs.nal.usda.gov. Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds United States Department of Agriculture Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds National Agricultural Library September 1991 Animal Welfare Information Center By: Jean Larson Janice Swanson D'Anna Berry Cynthia Smith Animal Welfare Information Center National Agricultural Library U.S. Department of Agriculture And American Minor Breeds Conservancy P.O. Box 477 Pittboro, NC 27312 Acknowledgement: Jennifer Carter for computer and technical support. Published by: U. S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library Animal Welfare Information Center Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Contact us: http://awic.nal.usda.gov/contact-us Web site: www.nal.usda.gov/awic Published in cooperation with the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine Policies and Links Introduction minorbreeds.htm[1/15/2015 2:16:51 PM] Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds For centuries animals have worked with and for people. Cattle, goats, sheep, pigs, poultry and other livestock have been an essential part of agriculture and our history as a nation. With the change of agriculture from a way of life to a successful industry, we are losing our agricultural roots. Although we descend from a nation of farmers, few of us can name more than a handful of livestock breeds that are important to our production of food and fiber.
    [Show full text]
  • Introgression and the Fate of Domesticated Genes in a Wild Mammal
    Adaptive Admixture in Soay Sheep 1 1 Introgression and the Fate of Domesticated Genes in a Wild Mammal This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Feulner PGD, Gratten J, Kijas JW, Visscher 2 Population PM, Pemberton JM & Slate J (2013) Introgression and the fate of domesticated genes in a wild mammal population. Molecular Ecology 22: 4210–4221, which has been published in final form at 10.1111/mec.12378. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with 3 Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. 4 Philine G.D. Feulner*1,2, Jacob Gratten*1,3, James W. Kijas4, Peter M. Visscher1,5, Josephine 5 M. Pemberton6, Jon Slate1 6 *joint first authors 7 8 1 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK 9 2 Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Ploen, 10 Germany 11 3 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 12 4 Livestock Industries, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia 13 5 The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 14 6 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15 Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK 16 17 Keywords: admixture; adaptive introgression; Soay sheep; domesticated alleles; natural 18 selection 19 20 Corresponding author: 21 Philine Feulner 22 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology 23 August-Thienemann-Str. 2 24 24306 Plön 1 Adaptive Admixture in Soay Sheep 2 25 Germany 26 Tel: +49 (0) 4522 763-228 27 Fax: +49 (0) 4522 763-310 28 [email protected] 29 2 Adaptive Admixture in Soay Sheep 3 30 Abstract 31 When domesticated species are not reproductively isolated from their wild relatives, the opportunity 32 arises for artificially selected variants to be re-introduced into the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • SHEEP Blackface Sheep Breeders' Association
    SHEEP Blackface Sheep Breeders’ Association ................. 48 Tay Street, Perth, Scotland. Scottish Blackface Breeders’ Association ............... 1699 H H Hwy., Willow Springs, MO 65793 U.S.A. Bluefaced Leicester Sheep Breeders Association .. Riverside View, Warwick Rd., Carlisle, CA1 2BS Scotland Border Leicester Sheep Breeders ........................... Greenend, St. Boswells, Melrose, TD6 9ES England California Red Sheep Registry ................................ P.O. Box 468, LaPlata, NM 87418 U.S.A. British Charollais, Sheep Society ............................ Youngmans Rd., Wymondham, Norfolk NR18 0RR England Mouton Charollais, Texel & Romanov .................... U.P.R.A., 36, rue du Général Leclerc, 71120 Charolles, France American Cheviot Sheep Society, Inc ..................... R.R. 1, Box 100, Clarks Hill, IN 47930 U.S.A. Cheviot Sheep Society ............................................ 1 Bridge St., Hawick, Scotland North American Clun Forest Association ................ W 5855 Muhlum Rd., Holmen, WI 54636 U.S.A. Columbia Sheep Breeders’ Association of P.O. Box 272, Upper Sandusky, OH America 43351 U.S.A. American Corriedale Association, Inc. .................... Box 391, Clay City, IL 62824 U.S.A. Australian Corriedale Sheep Breeders’ Sydney, N.S.W., Australia. Association Corriedale Sheep Society, Inc. ............................... 154 Hereford St., Christchurch, New Zealand. American Cotswold Record Association ................. 18 Elm St., P.O. Box 59, Plympton, MA 02367 U.S.A. Cotswold Breeders Association .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Progress on Jaagsiekte Diagnositic Tools
    Sheep FarmerMARCH/APRIL 2013 THE JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL SHEEP ASSOCIATION PROGRESS ON JAAGSIEKTE DIAGNOSITIC TOOLS SCHMALLENBERG SURVEY GOES LIVE PREVIEW OF FIVE NSA REGIONAL EVENTS IS LIFE REALLY EASIER FOR KIWI FARMERS? MaximiseMaximise EweEwe PerformancePerformance AndAnd IncreaseIncrease ProfitsProfits Efficient Treatment Combination For Only 28 Day Fluke, Worms And Control Of Scab Meat Ensures Cleaner Pastures For Grazing Withhold! Effectively Kills Fluke From Seven Weeks To Adult Order Closamectin Sheep Injection Today To See The Results At Lambing! www.closamectin.com Please read the product data sheet and seek advice before use. The dosing programme should be established by a veterinary surgeon or suitably qualified person. Manufactured and distributed in NI by: Norbrook Laboratories Ltd, Station Works, Newry, Co. Down, BT35 6JP. Distributed in GB by: Norbrook Laboratories (GB) Ltd, 1 Saxon Way East, Oakley Hay Industrial Estate, Corby, NN18 9EX. Legal Category: POM-VPS. Closamectin Solution for Injection for Sheep contains 0.5%w/v (5mg/ml) Ivermectin and 12.5%w/v (125mg/ml) Closantel. 1788-LA(S)-v1-GB-19/12/12 www.norbrook.com Contact your Norbrook® Has Got It Covered local vet or This Lambing Time trade store KETOSAID for details. CONTENTS Sheep Phil Stocker Writes... ........................................................................................ 2 Farmer News in Brief ...................................................................................................... 3 Vol. 32, No 2 Regional Reports ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]