DOCSLIB.ORG

Hart Vegetation Retention and Removal Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hart Vegetation Retention and Removal Plans NOTES PROJECT COMMITMENTS 53 52 1. Intended pipeline alignment is indicative only. Commitment to only utilise a 10m width when crossing 51 50 2. Root Protection Areas are only illustrated within the Order Limits, O1 through boundaries between fields where these include 58 49 48 hedgerows, trees or watercourses. 45 47 except within inset plans. 44 46 43 57 3. Additional scrub and ground cover may also need to be cleared 42 41 40 beneath the canopy of trees in woodland areas, to allow access 39 LOCATION SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS for the pipeline installation. 38 36 37 35 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce the impacts on 34 56 NW4 woodland and landscape within two areas with a combined 33 Montgomery`s 32 NW5 approximate distance of 100m. (Grid ref: SU7849946112 to 31 Farm 30 SU7853046153 and SU7854846176 to SU7857846217) 29 28 Pit 27 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce(disused) the impacts on Lee 26 Priority Habitat woodland with bat roost potential over an 25 NW6 Wood 24 approximate distance of 83m. (Grid ref: SU7877146476 to 23 22 SU7883346529) 21 59 20 19 18 D47 Locate haul road to use existing hedge gap. 17 16 55 15 14 13 12 11 10 54 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Montgomery Lane LOCATION PLAN SCALE 1:500,000 Swanthorpe House LEGEND ORDER LIMITS INTENDED PIPELINE ALIGNMENT O1 LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY BOUNDARY SHEET 27 HEDGEROW SHEET 28 O1 HCX 192 EXISTING CONTEXT HEDGEROW ANCIENT WOODLAND O1 HCX 191 ROOT PROTECTION AREAS WITHIN ORDER LIMITS - Dippenhall Road SEE NOTE 2 HEDGEROW HCX 190 No construction in this area. EXISTING FEATURES TO BE RETAINED Pits (disused) TREES AND WOODLAND TO BE RETAINED Hart District LINE CUT East Hampshire District HEDGEROWS TO BE RETAINED D47 NW6 IMPROVED GRASSLAND PASTURE TO BE NW4 RETAINED NW5 ARABLE LAND TO BE RETAINED EXISTING FEATURES TO BE REMOVED Roman Villa SHEET 26 SHEET 27 Environmental Mitigation Area (site Of) TREES AND WOODLAND TO BE REMOVED EM39 (Hedgerow infilling) No construction. HEDGEROWS TO BE REMOVED Ground protection to be AREA TO BE TOPSOIL STRIPPED installed within Root Protection Area. HEDGEROW HCX 189 LamberR - O1 CUT LINE CUT Land within adjoining Relevant Planning Authority. A1Frame - Dick`s Wood 19/05/2021 16:43:04 - Final for issue 3.0 17/05/21 DR/LD SK SN Rev Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Checkd Rev'd Apprv'd 1180 Eskdale Road, Winnersh, Wokingham, RG41 5TU Tel:+44(0)118 946 7000 1180Tel:+44(0)118 Eskdale Road, 946 7000Winnersh, Fax:+44(0)118 Wokingham,www.jacobs.com 946 RG41 7001 5TU Fax:+44(0)118 946 7001 Barley Pound www.jacobs.com Dippenhall Road Client Esso Petroleum Company, Limited Ermyn House, Barley Ermyn Way, Copse Leatherhead, Pound Surrey. KT22 8UX Project Locks Grove Drawing title VEGETATION RETENTION AND REMOVAL PLANS Earthworks SHEET 27B Drawing status Fit for Information Scale 1:2500 DO NOT SCALE Jacobs No. B2325301 Rev Client no. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown 3.0 copyright and database rights 2021. Drawing number B2325301-JAC-000-ENV-DRG-000068 0 50 100 150 200 250 m © Crown copyright and database rights © Copyright 2020 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. C:\pwworking\jacobs_uk_water&utilities_ss4\lamberr\dms53919\B2325301-JAC-000-ENV-DRG-000068.dwg Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of G 2021 OS Licence Number AL100005237. copyright. Limitation: This drawing has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs' Client, and is subject D N A C I to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or W O T A SCALE 1 : 2500 @ A1 U A D R responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this drawing by any third party. 0 10 20 30 40 50 m NOTES PROJECT COMMITMENTS 53 Location where the 52 Contractor will assess the SCALE 1 : 500 1. Intended pipeline alignment is indicative only. Commitment to only utilise a 10m width when crossing 51 through boundaries between fields where these include risk for windthrow prior to 50 2. Root Protection Areas are only illustrated within the Order Limits, O1 58 49 vegetation removal. Location where the 48 except within inset plans. hedgerows, trees or watercourses. Ground protection to be Ground protection to be 45 47 44 46 Contractor will assess the 43 3. Additional scrub and ground cover may also need to be cleared installed within Root installed within Root 57 42 41 risk for windthrow prior to 40 beneath the canopy of trees in woodland areas, to allow access Protection Area. Protection Area. 39 LOCATION SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS for the pipeline installation. NW7 vegetation removal. 38 36 37 35 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce the impacts on 34 56 33 woodland blocks within Oak Park Golf Course, some with bat TS 32 NW7 roost potential and connection to Ancient Woodland. The 31 30 approximate distance would be 305m. (Grid ref: 29 SU8038548477 to SU8053248738) 28 27 26 25 Turf to be stripped above trench and stored to be re-laid. 24 TS Ground protection to be installed for the remainder of the 23 22 10m width working area. 21 59 20 19 River bank and in-channel vegetation would be retained 18 G131 17 where not directly affected by installation works. 16 55 15 14 13 12 11 10 54 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 LOCATION PLAN SCALE 1:500,000 LEGEND ENLARGED PLAN - WOODLAND AT OAK PARK GOLF COURSE ORDER LIMITS SCALE 1:500 INTENDED PIPELINE ALIGNMENT EXISTING CONTEXT CONSERVATION AREA ANCIENT WOODLAND TREE PRESERVATION ORDER (TPO) INDIVIDUAL CENTRES OF NOTABLE TREES ROOT PROTECTION AREAS WITHIN ORDER LIMITS - SEE NOTE 2 PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY WATERCOURSE WATERCOURSE CROSSING PONDS O1 EXISTING FEATURES TO BE RETAINED HEDGEROW HCX 195 TREES AND WOODLAND TO BE RETAINED HEDGEROWS TO BE RETAINED O1 Ground protection to be IMPROVED GRASSLAND PASTURE TO BE installed within Root HEDGEROW RETAINED Protection Area. Ground protection to be HCX 194 AMENITY GRASSLAND TO BE RETAINED installed within Root Protection Area. HEDGEROW ARABLE LAND TO BE RETAINED HCX 196 O1 NW7 EXISTING FEATURES TO BE REMOVED HEDGEROW TREES AND WOODLAND TO BE REMOVED LamberR TS - HCX 197 HEDGEROWS TO BE REMOVED SHEET 28 SHEET 29 AREA TO BE TOPSOIL STRIPPED A1Frame - SHEET 27 SHEET 28 HEDGEROW HCX 193 O1 02/02/2021 20:37:14 - Final for issue Location where the Contractor 2.0 01/02/21 JS/RL DR/LD SK SN will assess the risk for windthrow prior to vegetation Rev Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Checkd Rev'd Apprv'd removal. CUT LINE CUT CUT LINE CUT SEE ENLARGED PLAN - 1180 Eskdale Road, Winnersh, Wokingham, RG41 5TU WOODLAND AT OAK PARK Tel:+44(0)118 946 7000 1180Tel:+44(0)118www.jacobs.com Eskdale Road, 946 7000Winnersh, Fax:+44(0)118 Wokingham, 946 RG41 7001 5TU Fax:+44(0)118 946 7001 GOLF COURSE www.jacobs.com Client Esso Petroleum Company, Limited G131 Ermyn House, Ermyn Way, Leatherhead, Surrey. KT22 8UX Project Drawing title VEGETATION RETENTION AND REMOVAL PLANS SHEET 28 Drawing status Fit for Information Scale 1:2500 DO NOT SCALE Jacobs No. B2325301 Rev Client no. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown 2.0 copyright and database rights 2021. Drawing number B2325301-JAC-000-ENV-DRG-000031 0 50 100 150 200 250 m © Crown copyright and database rights © Copyright 2020 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. C:\pwworking\jacobs_uk_water&utilities_ss4\lamberr\dms53919\B2325301-JAC-000-ENV-DRG-000031.dwg Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of G 2021 OS Licence Number AL100005237. copyright. Limitation: This drawing has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs' Client, and is subject D N A C I to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or W O T A SCALE 1 : 2500 @ A1 U A D R responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this drawing by any third party. PROJECT COMMITMENTS 0 10 20 30 40 50 m NOTES ANCIENT WOODLAND MITIGATION HIERARCHY¹ 53 D58 52 SCALE 1 : 500 1. Intended pipeline alignment is indicative only. Commitment to only utilise a 10m width when crossing A minimum buffer width of 15m shall be maintained between A3 TS 51 through boundaries between fields where these include 50 2. Root Protection Areas are only illustrated within the Order Limits, O1 58 49 the pipeline trench and the Ancient Woodland Inventory 48 except within inset plans. hedgerows, trees or watercourses. 45 47 boundary or the surveyed edge of potential ancient woodland. 44 46 43 3. Additional scrub and ground cover may also need to be cleared 57 Appropriate and readily visible demarcation shall be 42 41 40 beneath the canopy of trees in woodland areas, to allow access maintained to define the 15m buffer where this extends within 39 LOCATION SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS 38 for the pipeline installation. 60 A1 the Order Limits and to control access during construction. 36 37 Installation of the pipeline will be kept outside of this 15m 35 61 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce the impacts on 34 buffer. Where not practicable to exclude all potentially 56 33 woodland blocks within Oak Park Golf Course, some with bat 32 NW7 roost potential and connection to Ancient Woodland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Literature Review of Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and Their Wildlife
    Report Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife J C Underhill-Day RSPB, Syldata Arne, Wareham Dorset BH20 5BJ Telephone: 01929 550969 email: [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Executive summary Introduction Heather clad lowland heath developed on light, freely draining, acid soils following prehistoric woodland clearance, and down the centuries, has been kept open by grazing, burning and cutting. As the economic value of these uses declined, considerable areas of heath were lost to agriculture, forestry, housing, roads, mineral working and other uses, and today, much of what is left is adjacent to built up areas, especially in Dorset. These lowland heathland fragments can be found across much of southern England on suitable soils. Much of the research on heathlands over the last twenty years has concentrated on the Dorset heaths, which are now almost all SSSIs and mostly within the Dorset Heathland SPA. While this report reflects the bias in the literature towards work in Dorset, the results have wide applicability to urban heathlands that are accessed by the surrounding urban populations for amenity and recreation whether in Dorset or elsewhere. This urban public access places considerable pressures on the heaths, for example through disturbance, wild fires, trampling, predation by domestic pets, pollution and enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Report – Consultation Draft
    PUBLIC ACCESS CONSULTANCY FOR THE ARMY TRAINING ESTATE Regional Report – Consultation Draft ATE Home Counties Prepared by: RPS, Oxford August 2003 RPS Mallams Court 18 Milton Park Abingdon Oxfordshire OX14 4RP Tel 01235 821888 Fax 01235 820351 Email [email protected] Contents Page No 1 Introduction 1 2 Army Training Estate Home Counties 4 3 Public Access to the Home Counties 7 4 Access to the Army Training Estate Home Counties 15 RPS i R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft Figures & Appendices Figures 1 Map of Army Training Estate, highlighting ATE Home Counties 2 Map of ATE Home Counties Tables 1 Details of Training Areas and Ranges 2 Utilisation Rates 3 Length of Public Rights of Way (PROW) by Type in each Highway Authority Area 4 Indicator of Supply and Demand for PROW 5 International, National and Regional Walking, Riding and Cycling Trails 6 Indicative List of Licensed Activities 7 Timetable for CROW Act Mapping 8 Summary of Proposals and Recommendations RPS ii R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft Appendices Appendix A Proforma for Site Visits Appendix B Site Reports • Barton Stacey Training Area • Chilcomb Range • Moody’s Down Range and Barton Stacey DTA • Browndown Training Area • Otmoor Range • Bramley Training Area • Aldershot Training Area • Ash Ranges • Pirbright Ranges • Sandhurst (RMAS) • Minley Training Area • Longmoor Training Area • Longmoor Range and Training Area • Bordon Training Area • Bramshott • Hankley and Elstead Appendix C Sources of Information Appendix D Glossary of Terms/Abbreviation RPS iii R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft 1 Introduction Overall Aims of the Study 1.1 RPS has been commissioned by Headquarters Land Command (HQ Land) and Defence Estates (DE), to undertake a study of Public Access across the Army Training Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • 20101019-MOD SSSI List-U
    SSSIs on MOD Land - England Interest WITHIN Sum of Overlap Area Country MOD Site SSSI Name Special Protection Area Special Area of Conservation Ramsar Site Total ENGLAND ALTCAR TRAINING CAMP Sefton Coast RIBBLE & ALT ESTUARIES SEFTON COAST RIBBLE & ALT ESTUARIES 122.53 ATTURM INSTOW Taw-Torridge Estuary 5.01 BEACHLEY BARRACKS RIVER WYE 24.80 Severn Estuary SEVERN ESTUARY SEVERN ESTUARY SEVERN ESTUARY 28.93 BLANDFORD Blandford Camp 28.69 CANNOCK CHASE: STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY ARMY CADET FORCE WEEKEND TRAINING CENTRE CANNOCK CHASE CANNOCK CHASE 7.66 CHILMARK Chilmark Quarries CHILMARK QUARRIES 2.62 BATH & BRADFORD ON CORSHAM Box Mine AVON BATS 0.22 DCSA RADIO PENHALE SANDS Penhale Dunes PENHALE DUNES 0.87 DFG WEST MOORS Holt And West Moors Heaths DORSET HEATHLANDS DORSET HEATHS DORSET HEATHLANDS 112.25 TAMAR ESTUARIES PLYMOUTH SOUND & DMC ERNESETTLE Tamar - Tavy Estuary COMPLEX ESTUARIES 154.53 DMC GOSPORT Portsmouth Harbour PORTSMOUTH HARBOUR PORTSMOUTH HARBOUR 2.24 DSTL BINCLEAVES DSTL BINCLEAVES Portland Harbour Shore 1.37 DSTL PORTON DOWN Porton Down PORTON DOWN SALISBURY PLAIN 1561.97 DTE E: BARNHAM Thetford Heaths BRECKLAND BRECKLAND 153.83 DTE E: COLCHESTER Roman River 270.53 DTE E: COLCHESTER / FINGRINGHOE Colne Estuary COLNE ESTUARY ESSEX ESTUARIES COLNE ESTUARY 528.74 Roman River 2.48 SALTFLEETBY - DTE E: DONNA NOOK AIR WEAPONS THEDDLETHORPE DUNES RANGE Humber Estuary HUMBER ESTUARY & GIBRALTAR POINT Humber Estuary 895.05 DTE E: DUKERIES Birklands And Bilhaugh BIRKLANDS & BILHAUGH 5.54 201.13 Birklands West And Ollerton Corner 68.24
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Bird Report 2012
    Hampshire Bird Report 2012 Hampshire Ornithological Society Published November 2013 Published November 2013 by the Hampshire Ornithological Society Registered Charity no. 1042309 www.hos.org.uk ISBN 978-0-9567712-3-0 £10.50 Text, photographs and artwork copyright © the Hampshire Ornithological Society and named authors and contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. The views expressed in this report are not necessarily those held by the Hampshire Ornithological Society. Printed by Hampshire Printing Services, Winchester, Hampshire. HOS is pleased to acknowledge the help of Hampshire County Council and Portsmouth City Council in the publication of this Report. Front cover: Wryneck at Pennington Marsh, Sep 13th 2012 by John Hilton. Frontispiece: Short-eared Owls by Dan Powell. Additional artwork by David Thelwell (www.dathelwell.co.uk) and Dan & Rosemary Powell (www.powellwildlifeart.com). AIMS OF THE SOCIETY The Hampshire Ornithological Society has three broad aims: • To promote the recording and study of bird life in Hampshire and to publish the results in its annual Bird Report. • To use these results to encourage and support the conservation of wild birds and their habitats in the County. • To foster a wider interest in the recording and preservation of Hampshire bird life by organising a programme of indoor and outdoor meetings, by publishing a quarterly magazine and other forms of publicity. MEMBERSHIP The annual subscription is £12 for Ordinary, Joint or Family membership; £5 for Junior membership (under 18s).
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Basin Heaths SPA Technical Background Document Appendix 8
    Thames Basin Heaths SPA – Technical Background Document to the Core Strategy DPD JUNE 2007 Appendix 8 – Full assessment of open space 111 Thames Basin Heaths SPA – Technical Background Document to the Core Strategy DPD JUNE 2007 The following sites are those which have been considered to be suitable as alternative areas of recreation to the SPA. ‘THE CUT’ CLUSTER The Cut Cluster consists of: Jock's Copse, Tinker's Copse, The Cut (south), Garth Meadows, Larks Hill and Piggy Wood. The size of the ‘Cut Cluster’ lends itelf to a 5km catchment zone as shown below: 112 Thames Basin Heaths SPA – Technical Background Document to the Core Strategy DPD JUNE 2007 Site Name Jock's Copse / Tinker's Copse / The Cut (south) OS Co-ordinates SU 857 704 Area 3.63 hectares Typology E / F (urban woodland / green corridor) Ward Binfield With Warfield PPG17 Ref No’s 70, 141, 135 PPG17 Audit Jocks Copse – 40% Average Tinkers Copse – 45% Average The Cut (South) – 39% Average Features A generally naturalistic site (Bracknell Forest Borough Council, 2002) comprising a small copse (100% wooded cover) in a residential area combined with linear open space alongside the Cut river corridor (40% wooded). Both Tinkers Copse and Jock’s Copse consist of areas of ancient woodland which used to be set in an open rural farmland landscape. House building in the 1990s enclosed the copses, which had been derelict and unmanaged for quite some time prior to this. Nature Conservation Interests The area now provides a valuable wildlife oasis within the urban area, with primroses and carpets of bluebells in the Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Calthorpe Park
    Friends of Calthorpe Park CALTHORPE PARK DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2013–2018 Calthorpe Park Development Plan Adopted at RLA on 17 July 2013 Calthorpe Park Development Plan 10 July 2013 Contents PART 1 – MANAGEMENT AND FACILITIES 1. Introduction 2. Site Description and Information Base 2.1 Name of site 2.2 Location 2.3 Park users 2.4 Grid reference 2.5 Area 2.6 Byelaws 2.7 Land ownership of Calthorpe Park 3. History of the site 3.1 Lady Calthorpe’s Deed of Gift and Covenant 3.2 Fleet Cricket Club 3.3 Fleet Town Football Club 3.4 Football training 3.5 Odiham District Scouts 4. Features of the site 4.1 Existing sporting provision 4.1.1 Football pitches 4.1.2 Tennis courts 4.1.3 Sports pavilion 4.1.4 Other users of the Park 4.2 Swan structure 4.3 Jubilee wood 4.4 Cycle route 5. Annual events 6. Current management practices 7. Management issues 7.1 User requirements 7.2 Conflicts between interest groups 7.3 Car parking 7.4 Vandalism 8. SWOT analysis 9. Action plan on general issues for Calthorpe Park 2 Calthorpe Park Development Plan 10 July 2013 9.1 Vision and Objectives 9.2 Community involvement 9.2.1 Action days 9.3 Utilising the Park 9.3.1 CCTV 9.3.2 Multi-User Games Area 9.3.3 Wildflower Meadow 9.3.4 Children’s Play Area 9.3.5 Resurface playing fields 9.3.6 Manage the woodland 9.3.7 Outdoor Table Tennis Tables 9.3.8 Wet field adjoining Merivale 9.3.9 Adult Fitness Equipment 9.3.10 Develop an Orienteering Course in the Park 9.3.11 Upgrade Jubilee Garden 9.3.12 Sensory garden 9.3.13 Additional Parking 9.3.14 New Park Pavilion 9.4 A Welcoming Place 9.4.1 Increase Car Parking 9.4.2 Upgrade the pavilion 9.4.3 Signage 9.5 Health and Safety/security 9.5.1 Install CCTV in the Park 9.6 Maintenance of Equipment, Buildings and Landscape 9.6.1 Annual maintenance 9.6.2 Woodland management 3 Calthorpe Park Development Plan 10 July 2013 PART 2 ECOLOGY AND WILDLIFE Calthorpe Park - Key Objectives and Areas of Operation Summary of Management Plan 10.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC ACCESS CONSULTANCY for the ARMY TRAINING ESTATE Regional Report
    PUBLIC ACCESS CONSULTANCY FOR THE ARMY TRAINING ESTATE Regional Report – Consultation Draft ATE Home Counties Prepared by: RPS, Oxford August 2003 RPS Mallams Court 18 Milton Park Abingdon Oxfordshire OX14 4RP Tel 01235 821888 Fax 01235 820351 Email [email protected] Contents Page No 1 Introduction 1 2 Army Training Estate Home Counties 4 3 Public Access to the Home Counties 7 4 Access to the Army Training Estate Home Counties 15 RPS i R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft Figures & Appendices Figures 1 Map of Army Training Estate, highlighting ATE Home Counties 2 Map of ATE Home Counties Tables 1 Details of Training Areas and Ranges 2 Utilisation Rates 3 Length of Public Rights of Way (PROW) by Type in each Highway Authority Area 4 Indicator of Supply and Demand for PROW 5 International, National and Regional Walking, Riding and Cycling Trails 6 Indicative List of Licensed Activities 7 Timetable for CROW Act Mapping 8 Summary of Proposals and Recommendations RPS ii R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft Appendices Appendix A Proforma for Site Visits Appendix B Site Reports • Barton Stacey Training Area • Chilcomb Range • Moody’s Down Range and Barton Stacey DTA • Browndown Training Area • Otmoor Range • Bramley Training Area • Aldershot Training Area • Ash Ranges • Pirbright Ranges • Sandhurst (RMAS) • Minley Training Area • Longmoor Training Area • Longmoor Range and Training Area • Bordon Training Area • Bramshott • Hankley and Elstead Appendix C Sources of Information Appendix D Glossary of Terms/Abbreviation RPS iii R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft 1 Introduction Overall Aims of the Study 1.1 RPS has been commissioned by Headquarters Land Command (HQ Land) and Defence Estates (DE), to undertake a study of Public Access across the Army Training Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Strategy the Loddon Catchment
    Biodiversity Strategy The Loddon catchment Biodiversity Strategy: The Loddon catchment 2003 Protecting Wildlife for the Future Cover photograph: Foxlease and Ancells Meadow SSSI Acknowledgements Courtesy of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust This strategy has been produced by the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust with funding from Dormouse by Phil McLean the Environment Agency. Support and advice was Adder by Phil McLean provided by the Loddon catchment Biodiversity Silver Studded Blue by David Purslow Strategy Steering Group, comprising the following Lapwing by Dennis Garratt organisations: ! Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust ! Environment Agency ! Wokingham Unitary Authority ! Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust ! Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership ! Surrey Wildlife Trust Data for the strategy was provided by: ! Hampshire County Council ! Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre ! Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust ! Environment Agency ! Surrey Wildlife Trust ! Wokingham Unitary Authority ! Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership ! Hampshire Ornithological Society ! Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust This data has been analysed for the purposes of this project but remains the copyright of the data providers. Maps within the strategy have been produced by Naomi Ewald and remain the copyright of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust and the Environment Agency. Written by: Naomi Ewald, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Published by: Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Beechcroft House, Vicarage Lane, Curdridge, Hampshire, SO32 2DP. Company limited by guarantee and registered in England, no. 676313. Registered charity no. 201081. Maps have been reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • 24Th October 2006 Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area
    24th October 2006 Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA) Study Final Report by Environmental Dimension Partnership (EDP) On Behalf of Thames Valley New Homes Coalition (TVNHC) and Home Builders Federation (HBF) Volume I - Text Rep_215_02_MJL_RR_AW_RT_hkl Author MJL/RR/AW/RT Date 24/10/06 Approved Checked Copyright : No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of EDP Thames Basin Heaths SPA Final Report and Study Findings Rep215_02_241006_MJL_RR_AW_RT_hkl Contents Executive Summary........................................................................... i Section 1 Introduction and Background Information ........................ 1 Section 2 Ecological Review ............................................................ 8 Section 3 Recreational Review ....................................................... 13 Section 4 Thames Basin Heaths SPA Research ................................ 26 Section 5 Conclusions ................................................................... 61 Section 6 Proposed Strategy .......................................................... 64 Copyright : No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of EDP Thames Basin Heaths SPA Final Report and Study Findings Rep215_02_241006_MJL_RR_AW_RT_hkl Appendices EDP 1 Finalised scope of study EDP 2 Publications related to heathland / SPA issues under review by EDP EDP 3 SPA Analysis for Dorset and TBH EDP 4 EDP Briefing Note for 3 rd May 2006 meeting between
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment of The: Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (As Recommended for Adoption)
    Habitat Regulations Assessment of the: Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (as recommended for Adoption) (Assessment pursuant to Regulations 61 and 102 of “The Conservation of Species and Habitats Regulations 2010”) February 2014 Wokingham Borough Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (as recommended for Adoption) - Habitat Regulations Assessment (February 2014) Contents Summary ......................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 8 2 Assessment under the 2010 Habitats Regulations ................................... 9 3 Details of the Appropriate Assessment ................................................... 10 Stage 1 – Screening ................................................................................... 10 Is the project or plan directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site? ........................................................................ 10 Map 1: Natura 2000 sites within 15km of Wokingham Borough ..................... 11 Table 3.1 – Natura 2000 sites within 15km (linear) of Wokingham Borough .................................................................................................. 13 Describing the project or plan and description and characterisation of other projects or plans that in combination have the potential for having a significant effect on the Natura 2000 site ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC ACCESS CONSULTANCY for the ARMY TRAINING ESTATE Regional Report
    PUBLIC ACCESS CONSULTANCY FOR THE ARMY TRAINING ESTATE Regional Report – Consultation Draft ATE Home Counties Prepared by: RPS, Oxford August 2003 RPS Mallams Court 18 Milton Park Abingdon Oxfordshire OX14 4RP Tel 01235 821888 Fax 01235 820351 Email [email protected] Contents Page No 1 Introduction 1 2 Army Training Estate Home Counties 4 3 Public Access to the Home Counties 7 4 Access to the Army Training Estate Home Counties 15 RPS i R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft Figures & Appendices Figures 1 Map of Army Training Estate, highlighting ATE Home Counties 2 Map of ATE Home Counties Tables 1 Details of Training Areas and Ranges 2 Utilisation Rates 3 Length of Public Rights of Way (PROW) by Type in each Highway Authority Area 4 Indicator of Supply and Demand for PROW 5 International, National and Regional Walking, Riding and Cycling Trails 6 Indicative List of Licensed Activities 7 Timetable for CROW Act Mapping 8 Summary of Proposals and Recommendations RPS ii R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft Appendices Appendix A Proforma for Site Visits Appendix B Site Reports • Barton Stacey Training Area • Chilcomb Range • Moody’s Down Range and Barton Stacey DTA • Browndown Training Area • Otmoor Range • Bramley Training Area • Aldershot Training Area • Ash Ranges • Pirbright Ranges • Sandhurst (RMAS) • Minley Training Area • Longmoor Training Area • Longmoor Range and Training Area • Bordon Training Area • Bramshott • Hankley and Elstead Appendix C Sources of Information Appendix D Glossary of Terms/Abbreviation RPS iii R4078B/ATE HC/Regional Report August 2003 Consultation Draft 1 Introduction Overall Aims of the Study 1.1 RPS has been commissioned by Headquarters Land Command (HQ Land) and Defence Estates (DE), to undertake a study of Public Access across the Army Training Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Panel for the Draft South East Plan Examination in Public on My Findings
    REPORT TO THE PANEL FOR THE DRAFT SOUTH EAST PLAN EXAMINATION IN PUBLIC ON THE THAMES BASIN HEATHS SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA AND NATURAL ENGLAND’S DRAFT DELIVERY PLAN ASSESSOR: PETER BURLEY MA BPhil DipTP MLI MRTPI DATE: 19 FEBRUARY 2007 ASSESSOR’S REPORT ON THAMES BASIN HEATHS SPA AND THE DRAFT DELIVERY PLAN CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Terms of Reference…………………………………………………………………………. 4 Background……………………………………………………………………………….… 6 The Draft Delivery Plan a) Legal background and its interpretation……………………………………….….. 8 b) Conservation objectives……………………………………………………….….. 17 c) The evidence base ………………………………………………………………... 18 d) Future housing and recreational pressure on the SPA……………………………. 26 e) The impact of different forms of residential development …………………….… 35 f) The provision and delivery of SANGs…………………………………………… 36 g) The zonal approach…………………………………………………………….…. 44 h) SANGs standards……………………………………………………………….… 47 i) Habitat management…………………………………………………………….… 51 j) Access management…………………………………………………………….… 52 k) Other techniques…………………………………………………………………... 55 l) Role of Delivery Plan in the planning system and period it should cover………... 55 m) Funding……………………………………………………………………………. 56 n) Monitoring………………………………………………………………………… 57 Other matters………………………………………………………………………………… 58 Future management of the SPA……………………………………………………………... 58 Further research…………………………………………………………………………….. 59 Conclusions ………………………………………………………………………………..... 59 The implications for the South East Plan..……………………………………………….….. 60 Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………...
    [Show full text]