DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Regulations Assessment of The: Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (As Recommended for Adoption)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Regulations Assessment of The: Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (As Recommended for Adoption) Habitat Regulations Assessment of the: Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (as recommended for Adoption) (Assessment pursuant to Regulations 61 and 102 of “The Conservation of Species and Habitats Regulations 2010”) February 2014 Wokingham Borough Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (as recommended for Adoption) - Habitat Regulations Assessment (February 2014) Contents Summary ......................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 8 2 Assessment under the 2010 Habitats Regulations ................................... 9 3 Details of the Appropriate Assessment ................................................... 10 Stage 1 – Screening ................................................................................... 10 Is the project or plan directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site? ........................................................................ 10 Map 1: Natura 2000 sites within 15km of Wokingham Borough ..................... 11 Table 3.1 – Natura 2000 sites within 15km (linear) of Wokingham Borough .................................................................................................. 13 Describing the project or plan and description and characterisation of other projects or plans that in combination have the potential for having a significant effect on the Natura 2000 site ................................................ 13 Identifying the potential effects on the Natura 2000 site ......................... 15 Assessing the significance of any effects on the Natura 2000 site ......... 15 4 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 16 Appendix 1 - Organisations consulted on Screening Report .......................... 18 Appendix 2 – Statement of consultation on the Screening Report for the Habitat Regulations Assessment ................................................................... 19 Paragraph ................................................................................................... 19 Appendix 3 - Assessment under the Habitats Regulations 2010 ................... 21 Appendix 4 – Information on where people within Wokingham Borough undertake difference activities........................................................................ 23 Appendix 5 – Details of trips into Wokingham Borough. ................................ 26 Appendix 6 - Natura 2000 sites within 15 km of Wokingham Borough ........... 27 Aston Rowant SAC ..................................................................................... 28 Qualifying Features and Condition .......................................................... 28 Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 28 Activities likely to harm site’s condition ................................................... 29 Significance of impacts of the MDD ........................................................ 29 Conclusions whether MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Aston Rowant SAC ................................................................................. 31 Burnham Beeches SAC.............................................................................. 31 Qualifying Features and Condition .......................................................... 31 2 Wokingham Borough Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (as recommended for Adoption) - Habitat Regulations Assessment (February 2014) Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 31 Activities likely to harm site’s condition ................................................... 32 Significance of impacts of the MDD ........................................................ 32 Conclusions whether MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Burnham Beeches SAC .......................................................................... 33 Chilterns Beechwoods SAC ....................................................................... 33 Qualifying Features and Condition .......................................................... 34 Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 34 Activities likely to harm site’s condition ................................................... 35 Significance of impacts of the MDD ........................................................ 36 Conclusion on whether the MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Chilterns Beechwoods SAC ........................................................... 37 Hartslock Wood SAC .................................................................................. 37 Qualifying Features and condition .......................................................... 37 Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 38 Activities likely to harm site’s condition ................................................... 38 Significance of impacts of the MDD ........................................................ 38 Conclusions on whether MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Hartslock Wood SAC .............................................................................. 40 Thames Basin Heaths SPA ........................................................................ 40 Qualifying Features and conditions ......................................................... 40 Table A7.1: Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and their Wildlife. ........... 42 Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 43 Activities likely to cause harm to sites condition ..................................... 47 Significance of impacts of the MDD ........................................................ 47 Table A7.2 – Distribution of Wokingham Borough visitors according to their proximity to the SPA ....................................................................... 51 Map A7.1: Linear and travel distances zones of influence for the Thames Basin Heaths SPA ......................................................................................... 52 Map A7.2: Wokingham Borough’s visitors to the Thames Basin Heaths SPA 54 Table A7.3 – Thames Basin Heaths distance mitigation standards ........ 55 Conclusions on whether the MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Thames Basin Heaths SPA ........................................................... 58 Thursley, Ash, Pirbright and Chobham SAC .............................................. 58 Qualifying Features and condition .......................................................... 58 Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 59 Activities likely to harm site’s condition ................................................... 61 Significance of impacts of the MDD ........................................................ 61 Conclusions on whether the MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Thursley, Ash, Pirbright and Chobham SAC .................................. 64 Windsor Forest and Great Park SAC ......................................................... 64 Qualifying Features and condition .......................................................... 64 Conservation Objectives ......................................................................... 65 Activities likely to harm sites condition .................................................... 66 3 Wokingham Borough Submitted Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (as recommended for Adoption) - Habitat Regulations Assessment (February 2014) Significance of impacts of the MDD. ....................................................... 66 Conclusions on whether the MDD is likely to generate significant effects upon Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC ................................................ 69 Appendix 8 – Details of plans and projects produced by local authorities within 15km of Wokingham Borough ........................................................................ 70 Appendix 9 – Further examination of air quality issues on Natura 2000 sites 76 Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham SAC .............................................. 76 Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC ......................................................... 78 Thames Basin Heaths SPA .................................................................... 78 Appendix 10 – Summary of potential impacts of proposed and approved plans as required for the supplementary screening ................................................. 80 Appendix 11 – Calculation of potential traffic flows through SACs attributable to development in Wokingham Borough ........................................................ 84 Appendix 12 - Development proposed within the authorities surrounding the Thames Basin Heaths SPA ........................................................................... 86 Appendix 13 – Measures incorporated into Core Strategy and subsequent policy documents (including the MDD) that address impacts upon the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area ........................................................... 87 How each SDL avoids impacts upon the SPA ............................................ 89 Arborfield Garrison SDL (policy CP18) ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter Index May 2021
    Wycombe Wildlife Group (WWG) newsletter index (Revised 26 May 2021) Wycombe Wildlife Group has produced a newsletter 3 times a year since the Group was formed, initially as Wycombe Urban Wildlife Group, in 1989. Copies of all the newsletters issued have been placed on this website to provide a record of the history of the Group and some of its achievements and failures in carrying out its planned objectives. This index includes reports and articles published in the newsletters containing material relating to wildlife species and their conservation, wildlife habitats and their management, as well as listing past activities such as walks, talks and visits. The list is divided into categories to make it easier to find items on particular subjects. Each item on the list shows the number of the newsletter in which it was published.By selecting the relevant issue number from the list of issued newsletters, you can view or, if necessary, download that issue. This index will be updated following the issue of each future newsletter, and amended to take account of any changes considered necessary following the receipt of comments and/or suggested changes from members. Index of WUWG/WWG newsletter items (Revised May 2021) Group activities 24 hour Wildlife Watch Marathon (Issues 5, 6 and 24) Chair Museum wildlife garden (Issue 8) Create a Hedgerow project (Issue 34) Creation of bat hibernaculum at Booker (Issue 6) Grange Farm and Terriers Farm - fauna and flora surveys (Issue 35) Hang on to hedgerows project (Issues 30-32) Hedgehog survey (Issues 5
    [Show full text]
  • Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment
    Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report – including Appropriate Assessment January 2019 Wycombe District Local Plan– Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (January 2019) This page is left intentionally blank. 2 Wycombe District Local Plan– Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (January 2019) Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .................................................................................. 7 HRA and other assessments .......................................................................... 7 Legislative context .......................................................................................... 7 Sites integrity .................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2 – Methodology ............................................................................... 12 Stages of HRA .............................................................................................. 12 Scope of the Report ..................................................................................... 13 Assessment Steps ........................................................................................ 15 Chapter 3 – Special Areas of Conservation ................................................... 17 SACs assessed in this Report - Overview .................................................... 17 Site Improvement Plans ............................................................................... 19 Aston Rowant SAC ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants Group 2009 Newsletter
    Ashmolean Natural History Society of Oxfordshire Rare Plants Group 2009 Newsletter Birthwort, Aristolochia clematitis Photo: Charles Hayward www.oxfordrareplants.org.uk INTRODUCTION It was such a relief not to have a desperately wet summer in 2009 as the last two were, and what a joy when Creeping Marshwort came popping up in sheets on Port Meadow after an absence of 18 months. Photo 1(left): 1 June 2009. Port Meadow showing the flood-water retreating and mud flats exposed. Photo: Camilla Lambrick Photo 2 (right): 1 June 2009. Southern part of Port Meadow, a former Creeping Marshwort area, now drying mud. Graham Scholey of the Environment Agency and Rebecca Tibbetts of Natural England assess the situation. Photo: Camilla Lambrick Alas Fen Violet is still in trouble at Otmoor – perhaps not dry and warm early enough for this very early species. The Fen Violet exercised us most during 2009 by way of a meeting with specialists from Plantlife and Northern Ireland, in a nation-wide discussion of radical actions notably for introduction on RSPB land. True Fox-sedge looks to be well set-up for the future now that extensive introductions by BBOWT have proved successful. Other plants seem to get on well by themselves – Birthwort (see front cover picture and report on page 4) seems to be proliferating in the ditches of a medieval nunnery just north of Oxford city. Progress continues towards the Oxfordshire Rare Plants Register; photographs are being amassed, and thanks to Ellen Lee’s masterly command of the records we now have some 4000 new records beginning to take form as eye-catching maps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literature Review of Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and Their Wildlife
    Report Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife J C Underhill-Day RSPB, Syldata Arne, Wareham Dorset BH20 5BJ Telephone: 01929 550969 email: [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Executive summary Introduction Heather clad lowland heath developed on light, freely draining, acid soils following prehistoric woodland clearance, and down the centuries, has been kept open by grazing, burning and cutting. As the economic value of these uses declined, considerable areas of heath were lost to agriculture, forestry, housing, roads, mineral working and other uses, and today, much of what is left is adjacent to built up areas, especially in Dorset. These lowland heathland fragments can be found across much of southern England on suitable soils. Much of the research on heathlands over the last twenty years has concentrated on the Dorset heaths, which are now almost all SSSIs and mostly within the Dorset Heathland SPA. While this report reflects the bias in the literature towards work in Dorset, the results have wide applicability to urban heathlands that are accessed by the surrounding urban populations for amenity and recreation whether in Dorset or elsewhere. This urban public access places considerable pressures on the heaths, for example through disturbance, wild fires, trampling, predation by domestic pets, pollution and enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reading Naturalist
    The Reading Naturalist No. 53 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 2001 Price to Non Members £2.50 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 53 for the year 2000 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr Rod d’Ayala Honorary General Secretary Mrs Catherine Butcher Honorary Editor Dr Malcolm Storey Editorial Sub-committee The Editor, Dr Alan Brickstock, Mrs Linda Carter, Mr Hugh H. Carter Miss June M. V. Housden, Mr David G. Notton Honorary Recorders Botany: Mrs Linda Carter, Fungi: Dr Alan Brickstock Entomology: Mr David G. Notton Invertebates other than insects: Mr Hugh H. Carter Vertebrates: Mr Hugh H. Carter CONTENTS Obituary 1 Members’ Observations 1 Excursions Meryl Beek 2 Wednesday Afternoon Walks Alan Brickstock 5 Meetings (1999-2000) Catherine Butcher 6 The Fishlock Prize 7 Membership Norman Hall 8 Presidential address: Some Mycological Ramblings Alan Brickstock 9 Natural History Services provided at the Museum of Reading David G. Notton 13 A Mutant Foxglove Malcolm Storey 16 Sehirus dubius (or should that be dubious!) Chris Raper 17 Hartslock – a Local Success Story Chris Raper 17 Recorders’ Reports Malcolm Storey 19 “RDB” and “N” status – The Jargon Explained Rod d’Ayala 19 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2000 Linda Carter 20 The New Berkshire Flora Malcolm Storey 23 Recorder’s Report for Mycology 2000 Alan Brickstock 24 Recorder’s Report for Entomology 2000 David G. Notton 27 Recorder’s Report for Invertebrates other than insects 2000 Hugh H.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword
    Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Submission version Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword Foreword by Leader of the Council and the Lead Member for Planning We are delighted to present the Borough Local Plan for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The Borough Local Plan promotes a sustainable pattern of development for the Borough until 2033. The new development that is proposed in this plan aims to provide for new housing and affordable housing to fulfil the needs of all of our residents, whilst at the same time protecting our valued natural and built historic environment and assets. The plan aims to protect and enhance those elements that make our Borough special in the eyes of not only our residents but all those who choose to visit, work and invest in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. We are privileged to be home to one of the most recognisable and valued historic assets in the country, Windsor Castle and the Windsor Great Park which the Borough Local Plan seeks to protect not only for our own benefit but also for future generations. The Borough Local Plan is based on a substantial and robust evidence base and on the results of the consultation exercises we have carried out in the past, as guided by national policy and legislation. We have worked with partners including our neighbouring local authorities, statutory bodies and local communities and agencies, as well as considering the many emerging and adopted Neighbourhood Development Plans being prepared by parishes and neighbourhood forums. Planning often presents difficult choices and requires a balance of national policy and local wishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access.Cdr
    The Chilterns stretches from the River Thames in What is Access Land? There is no new right to cycle or horse-ride (except on south Oxfordshire through Buckinghamshire and The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 gives people bridleways, restricted byways and byways crossing access Bedfordshire to Hitchin in Hertfordshire. It contains a right to walk and enjoy informal recreation on designated land), drive vehicles (except on byways open to all traffic or some of the finest countryside in the UK, which is open access land. These are places where you are allowed other legal routes crossing access land), camp, hang-glide, recognised by its designation as an Area of to walk, sightsee, picnic, bird-watch and run. paraglide, use a metal detector or light fires. Existing access Outstanding Natural Beauty. From quiet valleys to rights are unaffected; if for example you have always enjoyed dramatic viewpoints, leafy green woodlands to flower- Walking on this land is different to walking on public rights the right to cycle or ride in an area, this will continue. covered meadows, the Chilterns has beautiful of way as you don't have to stick to a defined line. You are countryside to enjoy. free to explore interesting features and can decide your When you see this symbol it shows you are own route. entering open access land. Dogs on Access Land Open Access Landscapes Rights on access land extend to walking with dogs. In the Chilterns there are two types of access land, However, dogs must be kept on a fixed lead of no more Registered Common Land (accounting for two thirds than 2 metres in length whenever livestock are present, of access land) and Chalk Downland.
    [Show full text]
  • Salvia Pratensis Occurs
    Glossary links done & added to Big Glossary. IUCN table dSalviaone. pratensis Meadow clary, Clari’r maes LAMIACEAE SYN.: none Status: Schedule 8 of the Wildlife and Status in Europe: Not threatened Countryside Act 1981 Red Data Book: Lower risk - Nationally 38 (20 native or possibly native) / 233 10-km Scarce squares post 1987 Contents Status:...............................................................................................................1 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics................................................2 1.1 Morphology & Identification ........................................................................2 1.2 Taxonomic considerations ..........................................................................2 1.3 Genetic studies .........................................................................................2 2 Distribution and current status .........................................................................3 2.1 World ......................................................................................................4 2.2 Europe ....................................................................................................4 2.3 United Kingdom ........................................................................................6 2.3.1. England......................................................................................... 11 2.3.2. Scotland........................................................................................ 12 2.3.3. Northern Ireland............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Event Can Be Seen by Clicking Here
    Upper Thames Branch Moth Sightings Archive - January to June 2007 On Friday 29th June Dave Wilton carried out his transect in Finemere Wood and in the evening ran his overnight moth trap in his Westcott garden: "Moths seen in Finemere Wood were Narrow-bordered Five-spot Burnet (3), Clouded Border (2), Marbled White Spot (1) and Silver Y (1). My garden Robinson trap produced my first reasonable catch for a week or two, with more than 400 moths from about 80 species ending up in the trap. Best of the bunch were Lappet and Scarce Silver-lines, with Scarce Footman, Clay, Smoky Wainscot, Olive, Pleuroptya ruralis/Mother of Pearl and Phycitodes binaevella also new for my garden year list. The following evening a Blackneck came to our kitchen window light." Phycitodes binaevella Scarce Silver-lines Blackneck Photo © Dave Wilton Photo © Dave Wilton Photo © Dave Wilton ~ Thursday 28th June 2007 ~ Dave Wilton sent this moth report on 27th June: "On 26th June I was foolish enough to run my actinic trap at Westcott even though the temperature fell to 8 degrees Celsius overnight. The result was a pitiful catch of 64 moths from 17 species. Compare that to the same day last year when I got 800 moths in the Robinson! The poor weather of the past few days seems to have had a drastic effect on catches all across the country although last night did produce one new species for me, the Short-cloaked Moth. Looking on the bright side, thanks to Peter Hall and his microscope I do now have a few additions to the UTB list from back in April: Dichrorampha acuminatana, Elachista canapennella, Dipleurina lacustrata, Eudonia truncicolella and Parornix anglicella were all trapped in my garden, Rhopobota stagnana (B&F 1161, formerly Griselda stagnana) was found in the disused railway cutting west of Westcott Airfield and Pammene argyrana was caught in Rushbeds Wood." Also, while doing a butterfly transect in Finemere Wood on 20th June, Dave kicked up a Crambus perlella from the grass.
    [Show full text]
  • (2008) Morphometric and Population Genetic Analyses
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 157, 687–711. With 11 figures Morphometric and population genetic analyses elucidate the origin, evolutionary significance and conservation implications of Orchis ¥angusticruris (O. purpurea ¥ O. simia), a hybrid orchid new to Britain RICHARD M. BATEMAN*, RHIAN J. SMITH and MICHAEL F. FAY Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK Received 16 January 2008; accepted for publication 17 March 2008 We report the first confirmed occurrence in Britain of Orchis ¥ angusticruris Franch. ex Rouy, a hybrid between two closely related orchid species of anthropomorphic Orchis (O. purpurea Huds. ¥ O. simia Lam.) that hybridize frequently in Continental Europe. Seven individual hybrids, most likely F1 plants representing a single interspe- cific pollination event, first flowered with both parents in May 2006 at a nature reserve in the Chiltern Hills near Goring, Oxfordshire. Univariate and multivariate morphometric analyses (43 characters plus 12 indices), internal transcribed spacer sequencing, plastid microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analyses together readily separate the parents and confirm that O. purpurea was the ovule parent and O. simia the pollen parent, presumably reflecting the greater frequency and/or later flowering period of the latter at the site. This study reinforces a more general observation that, in most orchids, the ovule parent contributes substantially more to the hybrid phenotype than does the pollen parent, perhaps reflecting cytoplasmic inheritance. In contrast, the hybrids are placed closer to O. simia than to O. purpurea in the AFLP tree. Apparently recent arrivals, the few O. purpurea plants at Goring contrast genetically with the two other small populations of this species known in the Chilterns, but rather are consistent with relatively uncommon Continental populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hart Vegetation Retention and Removal Plans
    NOTES PROJECT COMMITMENTS 53 52 1. Intended pipeline alignment is indicative only. Commitment to only utilise a 10m width when crossing 51 50 2. Root Protection Areas are only illustrated within the Order Limits, O1 through boundaries between fields where these include 58 49 48 hedgerows, trees or watercourses. 45 47 except within inset plans. 44 46 43 57 3. Additional scrub and ground cover may also need to be cleared 42 41 40 beneath the canopy of trees in woodland areas, to allow access 39 LOCATION SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS for the pipeline installation. 38 36 37 35 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce the impacts on 34 56 NW4 woodland and landscape within two areas with a combined 33 Montgomery`s 32 NW5 approximate distance of 100m. (Grid ref: SU7849946112 to 31 Farm 30 SU7853046153 and SU7854846176 to SU7857846217) 29 28 Pit 27 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce(disused) the impacts on Lee 26 Priority Habitat woodland with bat roost potential over an 25 NW6 Wood 24 approximate distance of 83m. (Grid ref: SU7877146476 to 23 22 SU7883346529) 21 59 20 19 18 D47 Locate haul road to use existing hedge gap. 17 16 55 15 14 13 12 11 10 54 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Montgomery Lane LOCATION PLAN SCALE 1:500,000 Swanthorpe House LEGEND ORDER LIMITS INTENDED PIPELINE ALIGNMENT O1 LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY BOUNDARY SHEET 27 HEDGEROW SHEET 28 O1 HCX 192 EXISTING CONTEXT HEDGEROW ANCIENT WOODLAND O1 HCX 191 ROOT PROTECTION AREAS WITHIN ORDER LIMITS - Dippenhall Road SEE NOTE 2 HEDGEROW HCX 190 No construction in this area.
    [Show full text]