DOCSLIB.ORG

Salvia Pratensis Occurs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salvia Pratensis Occurs Glossary links done & added to Big Glossary. IUCN table dSalviaone. pratensis Meadow clary, Clari’r maes LAMIACEAE SYN.: none Status: Schedule 8 of the Wildlife and Status in Europe: Not threatened Countryside Act 1981 Red Data Book: Lower risk - Nationally 38 (20 native or possibly native) / 233 10-km Scarce squares post 1987 Contents Status:...............................................................................................................1 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics................................................2 1.1 Morphology & Identification ........................................................................2 1.2 Taxonomic considerations ..........................................................................2 1.3 Genetic studies .........................................................................................2 2 Distribution and current status .........................................................................3 2.1 World ......................................................................................................4 2.2 Europe ....................................................................................................4 2.3 United Kingdom ........................................................................................6 2.3.1. England......................................................................................... 11 2.3.2. Scotland........................................................................................ 12 2.3.3. Northern Ireland............................................................................. 12 2.3.4. Wales............................................................................................ 12 3 Ecology & Life Cycle...................................................................................... 12 4 Habitat Requirements ................................................................................... 16 4.1 Landscape perspective: Habitats where Salvia pratensis occurs ..................... 16 4.2 Communities & Vegetation ....................................................................... 17 4.3 Summary of habitat requirements ............................................................. 18 5 Management Implications .............................................................................. 19 6 Threats/ Factors leading to loss or decline or limiting recovery ............................ 22 7 Current Conservation Measures ...................................................................... 23 7.1 In Situ Measures.................................................................................... 23 7.2 Ex-Situ Measures ................................................................................... 26 7.3 Research Data ........................................................................................ 26 7.4 Monitoring Salvia pratensis and the common monitoring standard.................. 26 8 References .................................................................................................. 26 9 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 28 10 Contacts................................................................................................... 28 11 Links........................................................................................................ 29 12 Annex 1 - Holly Court Bank Monitoring Form 2002.......................................... 29 1 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics 1.1 MORPHOLOGY & IDENTIFICATION Salvia pratensis is a long-lived, erect perennial herb up to 80cm tall, glandular above; leaves ovate or ovate-oblong, cordate at base, doubly serrate; bracts small, green or tinged purplish; corolla 15-30mm in bisexual flowers, down to 10mm in female flowers, violet-blue. Native; calcareous grassland, scrub and wood-borders. Very local in c. 12 places in Southern England from East Kent to West Gloucs; Mons; naturalised elsewhere in central & southern Britain (Stace, 1991). Salvia pratensis is a striking and easily recognisable member of the Lamiaceae. The only native plant with which it could be confused is Salvia verbenaca, wild clary. The two are differentiated as follows: Bracts green, often tinged violet-blue, much shorter than Salvia pratensis flowers. Longest hairs on calyx white, eglandular; corolla with 0 or few Salvia verbenaca glandular hairs; lower leaves often distinctly lobed. Longest hairs on calyx brownish, glandular; corolla with many Salvia pratensis glandular hairs; leaves at most strongly doubly serrate. Hybrids between the two have been reported from France but not the UK. Figure 1 – Close up of Salvia pratensis flower (Photograph by Tim Rich, 1995). 1.2 TAXONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS None. 1.3 GENETIC STUDIES Some genetic studies have been carried out on Salvia pratensis in the UK (Kay and John, 1995). Additionally the genetics of 32 plant species of lowland grassland in Wales were studied, including Salvia pratensis. Six enzyme systems were studied using electrophoresis. Nine loci were found, of which five were polymorphic and four homozygous. The pattern of heterozygosity was variable and unexpected, suggesting that recombination might be restricted by a degree of structural heterozygosity. Kay and John found a strong correlation between geographic location and genetic identity, and 2 there was a suggestion of a cline of decreasing genetic variability from east to west, with the Monmouthshire population having least variation. Genetic studies on 14 Salvia pratensis populations in the Netherlands found 11 polymorphic loci, and a significant positive correlation was found between population size and both the proportion of polymorphic loci and the average number of alleles observed per locus (Van Treuren et al, 1991). Another study on Dutch Salvia pratensis populations showed a significant positive correlation between phenotypic variation and population size (Ouborg et al, 1991). From this it was inferred that genetic erosion had caused allozyme loss in small populations (Bijlsma et al, 1991 & 1994). Gene flow between populations in the Netherlands was found to be zero or very low (Van Treuren et al, 1991). In order to establish whether the genetic erosion and hence allozyme loss observed was threatening the viability of small populations of Salvia pratensis, a further study examined the relationship between population size and genetic fitness in a number of Salvia pratensis populations in the Netherlands (Ouborg & Van Treuren, 1995). Four populations from the previous studies were examined, and a number of fitness components compared in a common garden experiment. Seed size, germination rates, plant growth and reproductive success were compared between the four populations. The study showed that there was no correlation between population size and any of the fitness traits, although these did vary significantly between populations. The authors concluded that the differences were mainly maternal effects and not genetic. They did raise a note of caution suggesting that although low allozyme diversity in small populations was not currently causing any loss of fitness, this may be because these populations had only recently become small and were therefore at an early stage in the genetic erosion process. They postulated that progressive genetic erosion could lead to increased loss of alleles, increased homozygosity and hence a loss of fitness in the future. Miles King and Plantlife International’s field volunteers known as Flora Guardians collected samples of Salvia pratensis from all available English and Welsh populations in 2001, 2002 and 2003 (Wheeler, 2001; King, 2002). Dr Johannes Vogel at the Natural History Museum in London will investigate the allozyme diversity of these samples of Salvia pratensis from the UK and compare it with that of material from a number of locations in continental Europe. Dr Vogel and his team initially analysed variation across 18 enzymes in one population of Salvia pratensis. They found five enzymes with two or three alleles, and another two enzymes that may contain more than one allele. Given that these results were from just one population, Dr Vogel is confident that it will be possible to build up a comprehensive picture of variation across the UK once material from as many sources as possible has been collected and analysed. 2 Distribution and current status CLIMATIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC LIMITATIONS TO DISTRIBUTION. Salvia pratensis occurs in Britain at the North Western edge of its European range. As a temperate species, it can be expected to cope with hard winters, but also requires warm dry summers, and may have difficulties in very wet years and particularly in wet winters. It favours south or west facing slopes and now only occurs as a probable native as far north as the north Cotswolds (Chipping Campden) and as far west as Monmouthshire. Records from further north, and into the wetter southwest, do not indicate any great length of persistence following introduction, presumably as a hay or grass-seed contaminant. It is interesting to note though that one site, at Rauceby in Lincolnshire, did support a population of two large plants between 1937 and 1951. It can occur in (sub) alpine meadows to 1920m, suggesting that it is well adapted to cold, and to long winters. Perhaps the poor survival of seedlings through wet winters determines how far north and west in Europe Salvia pratensis can occur naturally. 3 2.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critically Endangered - Wikipedia
    Critically endangered - Wikipedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Critically endangered From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents This article is about the conservation designation itself. For lists of critically endangered species, see Lists of IUCN Red List Critically Endangered Featured content species. Current events A critically endangered (CR) species is one which has been categorized by the International Union for Random article Conservation status Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.[1] Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store As of 2014, there are 2464 animal and 2104 plant species with this assessment, compared with 1998 levels of 854 and 909, respectively.[2] Interaction Help As the IUCN Red List does not consider a species extinct until extensive, targeted surveys have been About Wikipedia conducted, species which are possibly extinct are still listed as critically endangered. IUCN maintains a list[3] Community portal of "possibly extinct" CR(PE) and "possibly extinct in the wild" CR(PEW) species, modelled on categories used Recent changes by BirdLife International to categorize these taxa. Contact page Contents Tools Extinct 1 International Union for Conservation of Nature definition What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 2 See also Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 3 Notes Upload file Threatened Special pages 4 References Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants Group 2009 Newsletter
    Ashmolean Natural History Society of Oxfordshire Rare Plants Group 2009 Newsletter Birthwort, Aristolochia clematitis Photo: Charles Hayward www.oxfordrareplants.org.uk INTRODUCTION It was such a relief not to have a desperately wet summer in 2009 as the last two were, and what a joy when Creeping Marshwort came popping up in sheets on Port Meadow after an absence of 18 months. Photo 1(left): 1 June 2009. Port Meadow showing the flood-water retreating and mud flats exposed. Photo: Camilla Lambrick Photo 2 (right): 1 June 2009. Southern part of Port Meadow, a former Creeping Marshwort area, now drying mud. Graham Scholey of the Environment Agency and Rebecca Tibbetts of Natural England assess the situation. Photo: Camilla Lambrick Alas Fen Violet is still in trouble at Otmoor – perhaps not dry and warm early enough for this very early species. The Fen Violet exercised us most during 2009 by way of a meeting with specialists from Plantlife and Northern Ireland, in a nation-wide discussion of radical actions notably for introduction on RSPB land. True Fox-sedge looks to be well set-up for the future now that extensive introductions by BBOWT have proved successful. Other plants seem to get on well by themselves – Birthwort (see front cover picture and report on page 4) seems to be proliferating in the ditches of a medieval nunnery just north of Oxford city. Progress continues towards the Oxfordshire Rare Plants Register; photographs are being amassed, and thanks to Ellen Lee’s masterly command of the records we now have some 4000 new records beginning to take form as eye-catching maps.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamiales Newsletter
    LAMIALES NEWSLETTER LAMIALES Issue number 4 February 1996 ISSN 1358-2305 EDITORIAL CONTENTS R.M. Harley & A. Paton Editorial 1 Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK The Lavender Bag 1 Welcome to the fourth Lamiales Universitaria, Coyoacan 04510, Newsletter. As usual, we still Mexico D.F. Mexico. Tel: Lamiaceae research in require articles for inclusion in the +5256224448. Fax: +525616 22 17. Hungary 1 next edition. If you would like to e-mail: [email protected] receive this or future Newsletters and T.P. Ramamoorthy, 412 Heart- Alien Salvia in Ethiopia 3 and are not already on our mailing wood Dr., Austin, TX 78745, USA. list, or wish to contribute an article, They are anxious to hear from any- Pollination ecology of please do not hesitate to contact us. one willing to help organise the con- Labiatae in Mediterranean 4 The editors’ e-mail addresses are: ference or who have ideas for sym- [email protected] or posium content. Studies on the genus Thymus 6 [email protected]. As reported in the last Newsletter the This edition of the Newsletter and Relationships of Subfamily Instituto de Quimica (UNAM, Mexi- the third edition (October 1994) will Pogostemonoideae 8 co City) have agreed to sponsor the shortly be available on the world Controversies over the next Lamiales conference. Due to wide web (http://www.rbgkew.org. Satureja complex 10 the current economic conditions in uk/science/lamiales). Mexico and to allow potential partici- This also gives a summary of what Obituary - Silvia Botta pants to plan ahead, it has been the Lamiales are and some of their de Miconi 11 decided to delay the conference until uses, details of Lamiales research at November 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison Sage Grouse Biological Opinion
    United States Department of Agriculture December 22, 2014 Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 Programmatic Consultation for the Gunnison Sage-Grouse Attached is the regionally developed Biological Opinion for the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus) in the States of Colorado and Utah. This Opinion takes effect concurrent with the effective date of the grouse’s listing as a threatened species on December 22nd, 2014. This Opinion replaces the 2010 SGI Conference Report for the Gunnison sage-grouse. Continue to use the 2010 SGI Conference Report for the Greater sage-grouse. Section 1.2 describes the Conversion of the Conference Report to a Biological Opinion. Document expires on 07/30/2040. Citation: DOI, 2014. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Biological Opinion for the Natural Resources Conservation Services’ USDA Farm Bill programs, including the Sage Grouse Initiative, and associated procedures, conservation practices, and conservation measures for the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). Denver, Colorado. Contact Chanda Pettie, State Biologist, at 720-544-2804 or [email protected] for information regarding the content of this notice. FOTG, Section II NRCS, CO SEC, T&E December 2014 BIOLOGICAL OPINION 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. [ESA],), and the Interagency Cooperation Regulations (50 CFR 402), this document transmits the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) Biological Opinion (Opinion) for the Natural Resources Conservation Services’ (NRCS) USDA Farm Bill programs, including the Sage Grouse Initiative (SGI), and associated procedures, conservation practices, and conservation measures for the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology Summary
    Pollination Ecology Summary Prof. em. Klaus Ammann, Neuchâtel [email protected] June 2013 Ohne den Pollenübertragungs-Service blütenbesuchender Tiere könnten sich viele Blütenpanzen nicht geschlechtlich fortpanzen. Die komplexen und faszinierenden Bestäubungsvorgänge bei Blütenpanzen sind Ausdruck von Jahrmillionen von Selektionsvorgängen, verbunden mit Selbstorganisation der Lebewesen; eine Sicht, die auch Darwin schon unterstützte. Bei vielen zwischenartlichen Beziehungen haben sich zwei oder auch mehrere Arten in ihrer Entwicklung gegenseitig beeinusst. Man spricht hier von sogenannter Coevolution. Deutlich ist die Coevolution auch bei verschiedenen Bestäubungssystemen und -mechanismen, die von symbiontischer bis parasitischer Natur sein können. Die Art-Entstehung, die Vegetationsökologie und die Entstehung von Kulturpanzen sind eng damit verbunden Veranstalter: Naturforschende Gesellschaft Schaffhausen 1. Pollination Ecology Darwin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollination_syndrome http://www.cas.vanderbilt.edu/bioimages/pages/pollination.htm Fenster, C.B., Armbruster, W.S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M.R., & Thomson, J.D. (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, pp 375-403 http://www.botanischergarten.ch/Pollination/Fenster-Pollination-Syndromes-2004.pdf invitation to browse in the website of the Friends of Charles Darwin http://darwin.gruts.com/weblog/archive/2008/02/ Working Place of Darwin in Downe Village http://www.focus.de/wissen/wissenschaft/wissenschaft-darwin-genoss-ein-suesses-studentenleben_aid_383172.html Darwin as a human being and as a scientist Darwin, C. (1862), On the various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects and on the good effects of intercrossing The Complete Work of Charles Darwin online, Scanned, OCRed and corrected by John van Wyhe 2003; further corrections 8.2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Content of Phenolics in Salvia Species Cultivated in South Moravian Region Hodnotenie Obsahu Fenolov Vo Vybraných Druhoch Rodu Salvia L
    Acta Fac. Pharm. Univ. Comen. LXII, 2015 (Suppl IX): 18-22. ISSN 1338-6786 (online) and ISSN 0301-2298 (print version), DOI: 10.1515/AFPUC-2015-0007 ACTA FACULTATIS PHARMACEUTICAE UNIVERSITATIS COMENIANAE Evaluation of content of phenolics in Salvia species cultivated in South Moravian Region Hodnotenie obsahu fenolov vo vybraných druhoch rodu Salvia L. pestovaných v Juhomoravskom kraji Original research article Muráriková A.1 , Kaffková K.1, Raab S.2, Neugebauerová J.1 1Mendel University in Brno, 1Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zahradnická fakulta, Faculty of Horticulture, Department of Vegetable Ústav zelinářství a květinářství, Česká republika Growing and Floriculture, Czech Republic / 2Agricultural Research, Ltd. Troubsko, Czech Republic 2Zemědělský výzkum, spol. s r.o. Troubsko, Česká republika Received November 30, 2014, accepted January 30, 2015 Abstract In this study, total phenolic content (TPC) and rosmarinic acid (RA) of 37 samples sage (Salvia L.) of extracts were determined using spectrophotometric methods. The amount of total phenols was analysed with Folin-Ciocalteu reagents. Gallic acid was used as a standard compound and the total phenols were expressed as mg.g−1 gallic acid equivalents of dried plant material. The values of the extracts displayed substantial differences. All of the investigated species exceptSalvia jurisicii (990.79 mg GAE. g−1 d.w.) exhibited higher content of phenolics. Among the studies, species demonstrated the highest content of phenol, followed in sequence by Salvia tomentosa, Salvia fruticosa, Salvia triloba, Salvia officinalis ‘Extrakta’, Salvia officinalis. TPC varied from 990.79 to 4459.88 mg GAE. g−1 d.w. in the extracts. The total amount of RA was between 0.88 and 8.04% among species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reading Naturalist
    The Reading Naturalist No. 53 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 2001 Price to Non Members £2.50 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 53 for the year 2000 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr Rod d’Ayala Honorary General Secretary Mrs Catherine Butcher Honorary Editor Dr Malcolm Storey Editorial Sub-committee The Editor, Dr Alan Brickstock, Mrs Linda Carter, Mr Hugh H. Carter Miss June M. V. Housden, Mr David G. Notton Honorary Recorders Botany: Mrs Linda Carter, Fungi: Dr Alan Brickstock Entomology: Mr David G. Notton Invertebates other than insects: Mr Hugh H. Carter Vertebrates: Mr Hugh H. Carter CONTENTS Obituary 1 Members’ Observations 1 Excursions Meryl Beek 2 Wednesday Afternoon Walks Alan Brickstock 5 Meetings (1999-2000) Catherine Butcher 6 The Fishlock Prize 7 Membership Norman Hall 8 Presidential address: Some Mycological Ramblings Alan Brickstock 9 Natural History Services provided at the Museum of Reading David G. Notton 13 A Mutant Foxglove Malcolm Storey 16 Sehirus dubius (or should that be dubious!) Chris Raper 17 Hartslock – a Local Success Story Chris Raper 17 Recorders’ Reports Malcolm Storey 19 “RDB” and “N” status – The Jargon Explained Rod d’Ayala 19 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2000 Linda Carter 20 The New Berkshire Flora Malcolm Storey 23 Recorder’s Report for Mycology 2000 Alan Brickstock 24 Recorder’s Report for Entomology 2000 David G. Notton 27 Recorder’s Report for Invertebrates other than insects 2000 Hugh H.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access.Cdr
    The Chilterns stretches from the River Thames in What is Access Land? There is no new right to cycle or horse-ride (except on south Oxfordshire through Buckinghamshire and The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 gives people bridleways, restricted byways and byways crossing access Bedfordshire to Hitchin in Hertfordshire. It contains a right to walk and enjoy informal recreation on designated land), drive vehicles (except on byways open to all traffic or some of the finest countryside in the UK, which is open access land. These are places where you are allowed other legal routes crossing access land), camp, hang-glide, recognised by its designation as an Area of to walk, sightsee, picnic, bird-watch and run. paraglide, use a metal detector or light fires. Existing access Outstanding Natural Beauty. From quiet valleys to rights are unaffected; if for example you have always enjoyed dramatic viewpoints, leafy green woodlands to flower- Walking on this land is different to walking on public rights the right to cycle or ride in an area, this will continue. covered meadows, the Chilterns has beautiful of way as you don't have to stick to a defined line. You are countryside to enjoy. free to explore interesting features and can decide your When you see this symbol it shows you are own route. entering open access land. Dogs on Access Land Open Access Landscapes Rights on access land extend to walking with dogs. In the Chilterns there are two types of access land, However, dogs must be kept on a fixed lead of no more Registered Common Land (accounting for two thirds than 2 metres in length whenever livestock are present, of access land) and Chalk Downland.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to Identify the Level of Threat to Plants
    Ex-Situ Conservation at Scott Arboretum Public gardens and arboreta are more than just pretty places. They serve as an insurance policy for the future through their well managed ex situ collections. Ex situ conservation focuses on safeguarding species by keeping them in places such as seed banks or living collections. In situ means "on site", so in situ conservation is the conservation of species diversity within normal and natural habitats and ecosystems. The Scott Arboretum is a member of Botanical Gardens Conservation International (BGCI), which works with botanic gardens around the world and other conservation partners to secure plant diversity for the benefit of people and the planet. The aim of BGCI is to ensure that threatened species are secure in botanic garden collections as an insurance policy against loss in the wild. Their work encompasses supporting botanic garden development where this is needed and addressing capacity building needs. They support ex situ conservation for priority species, with a focus on linking ex situ conservation with species conservation in natural habitats and they work with botanic gardens on the development and implementation of habitat restoration and education projects. BGCI uses the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to identify the level of threat to plants. In-depth analyses of the data contained in the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List are published periodically (usually at least once every four years). The results from the analysis of the data contained in the 2008 update of the IUCN Red List are published in The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; see www.iucn.org/redlist for further details.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk Act
    Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Government of Canada’s copyright administrator, Public Works and Government Services of Canada (PWGSC). For more information, please contact PWGSC at 613-996-6886 or at [email protected]. Cover photo credits: Olive Clubtail © Jim Johnson Peacock Vinyl Lichen © Timothy B. Wheeler Cerulean Warbler © Carl Savignac Title page photo credits: Background photo: Dune Tachinid Fly habitat © Sydney Cannings Foreground, large photo: Dwarf Lake Iris © Jessie M. Harris Small photos, left to right: Butler’s Gartersnake © Daniel W.A. Noble Hungerford’s Crawling Water Beetle © Steve Marshall Barn Swallow © Gordon Court Spring Salamander © David Green Available also on the Internet. ISSN: 1710-3029 Cat. no.: EN1-36/2011E-PDF © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2011 Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act Terrestrial Species November 2011 Please submit your comments by February 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing normal consultations and by November 8, 2012, for terrestrial species undergoing extended consultations.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants
    THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants T.G.F.Curtis & H.N. McGough Wildlife Service Ireland DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE 1988 ISBN 0 7076 0032 4 This version of the Red Data Book was scanned from the original book. The original book is A5-format, with 168 pages. Some changes have been made as follows: NOMENCLATURE has been updated, with the name used in the 1988 edition in brackets. Irish Names and family names have also been added. STATUS: There have been three Flora Protection Orders (1980, 1987, 1999) to date. If a species is currently protected (i.e. 1999) this is stated as PROTECTED, if it was previously protected, the year(s) of the relevant orders are given. IUCN categories have been updated as follows: EN to CR, V to EN, R to V. The original (1988) rating is given in brackets thus: “CR (EN)”. This takes account of the fact that a rare plant is not necessarily threatened. The European IUCN rating was given in the original book, here it is changed to the UK IUCN category as given in the 2005 Red Data Book listing. MAPS and APPENDIX have not been reproduced here. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are most grateful to the following for their help in the preparation of the Irish Red Data Book:- Christine Leon, CMC, Kew for writing the Preface to this Red Data Book and for helpful discussions on the European aspects of rare plant conservation; Edwin Wymer, who designed the cover and who, as part of his contract duties in the Wildlife Service, organised the computer applications to the data in an efficient and thorough manner.
    [Show full text]