Ministry of Defence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ministry of Defence Ministry of Defence SSSI unit condition (ha) UNFAVOURABLE UNFAVOURABLE NO UNFAVOURABLE Percent SSSI held by SSSI name Whole SSSI area (ha) FAVOURABLE PART DESTROYED DESTROYED MoD area RECOVERING CHANGE DECLINING MoD ALKHAM, LYDDEN AND SWINGFIELD WOODS 228.33 99.1 7.5 106.6 46.69% APPLEBY FELLS 10,693.02 453.7 4,532.2 4,985.8 46.63% ASH TO BROOKWOOD HEATHS 1,576.12 482.4 830.8 94.4 1,407.6 89.31% ASHDOWN FOREST 3,209.28 92.0 201.1 293.1 9.13% BARNHAMCROSS COMMON 69.08 0.1 0.1 0.16% BARROW BURN MEADOWS 5.18 2.9 2.3 5.2 100.00% BARROW MEADOW 5.67 5.6 5.6 99.29% BASINGSTOKE CANAL 101.15 5.3 8.6 19.1 0.2 33.1 32.76% BENFLEET AND SOUTHEND MARSHES 2,373.69 98.6 98.6 4.15% BILLSMOOR PARK AND GRASSLEES WOOD 112.58 4.3 0.3 4.6 4.09% BIRKLANDS AND BILHAUGH 505.73 206.1 1.5 207.6 41.05% BIRKLANDS WEST AND OLLERTON CORNER 414.64 61.7 6.6 68.2 16.46% BLANDFORD CAMP 28.69 3.6 25.1 28.7 99.97% BOURLEY AND LONG VALLEY 823.90 7.1 783.1 32.1 822.3 99.80% BOWES MOOR 4,489.89 0.3 0.3 0.01% BOWNESS COMMON 803.29 26.5 26.5 3.30% BOX MINE 58.74 0.2 0.2 0.39% BRADENHAM WOODS, PARK WOOD & THE COPPICE 134.93 0.0 0.0 0.01% BRAMSHOTT AND LUDSHOTT COMMONS 371.14 0.3 102.2 102.5 27.61% BRATTON DOWNS 400.08 119.1 44.7 0.2 0.0 164.1 41.01% BRAUNTON BURROWS 1,339.74 1.2 589.8 9.0 600.0 44.78% BRECKLAND FARMLAND 13,392.58 1,552.4 1,552.4 11.59% BRECKLAND FOREST 18,126.08 462.5 462.5 2.55% BRIDGHAM & BRETTENHAM HEATHS 441.70 200.9 200.9 45.48% BROADMOOR TO BAGSHOT WOODS AND HEATHS 1,696.33 81.2 495.7 576.9 34.01% BROWNDOWN 66.47 61.4 61.4 92.36% BROXHEAD AND KINGSLEY COMMONS 104.22 24.1 38.3 62.5 59.93% CASTLE BOTTOM TO YATELEY AND HAWLEY COMMONS 922.71 331.1 331.1 35.89% CAUDBECK FLOW 456.73 1.0 18.2 19.2 4.20% CHANCELLOR'S FARM 32.53 32.4 32.4 99.69% CHATTENDEN WOODS AND LODGE HILL 351.03 246.8 19.6 266.4 75.88% CHEQUER'S WOOD AND OLD PARK 106.87 70.5 33.9 104.4 97.68% CHESIL & THE FLEET 983.14 3.9 19.6 23.6 2.40% CHICHESTER HARBOUR 3,732.53 83.5 150.6 234.1 6.27% CHILMARK QUARRIES 9.78 1.5 0.0 1.1 2.7 27.20% COLLYWESTON GREAT WOOD AND EASTON HORNSTOCKS 151.51 0.1 0.1 0.04% COLNE ESTUARY 2,986.47 93.0 433.2 526.2 17.62% COLONY BOG AND BAGSHOT HEATH 1,129.83 68.3 901.7 4.6 974.7 86.27% COTTONSHOPE HEAD QUARRY 14.42 14.4 14.4 100.00% DANEBURY HILL 13.91 0.0 0.0 0.22% DEE ESTUARY 6,320.18 301.5 301.5 4.77% DIBDEN BAY 229.41 0.2 0.2 0.08% DRIGG COAST 1,400.02 18.9 63.4 30.7 113.0 8.07% DUNGENESS, ROMNEY MARSH AND RYE BAY 9,089.89 252.0 903.2 1,155.2 12.71% DURHAM COAST 510.78 18.5 18.5 3.61% DURTREES BURN GRASSLAND 4.23 2.2 2.1 4.2 99.76% EAST DEVON PEBBLEBED HEATHS 1,135.00 24.0 24.0 2.11% EAST WRETHAM HEATH 141.05 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.06% EASTERN PEAK DISTRICT MOORS 8,193.35 7.0 7.0 0.08% EELMOOR MARSH 66.34 0.1 0.1 0.08% EXE ESTUARY 2,190.05 0.7 0.7 0.03% FIGSBURY RING 11.16 0.0 0.0 0.27% FOLKESTONE TO ETCHINGHILL ESCARPMENT 267.46 52.8 0.1 0.0 52.9 19.77% FOULNESS 10,946.15 7,473.5 2,450.6 1.6 295.2 10,221.0 93.38% FOXLEASE AND ANCELLS MEADOWS 68.79 56.9 56.9 82.73% FREMINGTON QUAY CLIFFS 12.33 1.4 1.4 11.60% GIBRALTAR POINT 598.24 0.0 0.0 0.01% GODREVY HEAD TO ST AGNES 624.85 37.5 37.5 6.01% GRANTHAM CANAL 9.45 0.0 0.0 0.11% GREAT CHEVERELL HILL 33.69 23.1 10.6 33.7 100.03% GREAT SHUTTLESFIELD DOWN 21.82 21.8 21.8 100.00% GRIME'S GRAVES 66.12 28.0 28.0 42.33% HAM COMMON 32.93 0.9 6.8 7.7 23.32% HARBOTTLE MOORS 934.09 761.9 761.9 81.57% HEATH BROW 1.89 1.9 1.9 100.00% HELBECK WOOD 91.08 31.8 0.1 31.8 34.95% HIGH DYKE 6.77 0.0 0.0 0.30% HOLT AND WEST MOORS HEATHS 766.97 95.5 16.2 1.3 113.0 14.73% HOLYSTONE BURN WOODS 111.17 5.4 24.9 30.3 27.25% HOOKS WELL MEADOWS, GREAT CRESSINGHAM 15.64 4.8 4.8 30.95% HUMBER ESTUARY 37,000.60 891.4 4.8 896.1 2.42% IRTHING GORGE 44.53 5.7 5.7 12.82% ISLE OF PORTLAND 352.05 4.4 1.4 5.7 1.62% KIELDER MIRES 4,801.39 1.3 1.3 0.03% KIELDERHEAD AND EMBLEHOPE MOORS 8,433.76 0.2 5.8 6.0 0.07% KINGSBURY WOOD 60.11 60.1 60.1 100.00% KINGWATER 1.17 0.0 0.0 0.85% LEEK MOORS 3,970.84 66.1 354.0 13.7 433.8 10.93% LINBRIGG 7.34 7.3 7.3 99.73% LORDSWELL FIELD 3.28 0.0 0.0 1.22% LOVELY SEAT - STAINTON MOOR 10,132.52 985.5 985.5 9.73% LOWER SWALEDALE WOODS AND GRASSLANDS 266.88 9.7 22.8 32.5 12.17% LUNE FOREST 6,329.34 0.1 0.1 0.00% LYDDEN AND TEMPLE EWELL DOWNS 62.77 8.5 8.5 13.51% LYMPNE ESCARPMENT 140.17 37.0 37.0 26.36% LYNHER ESTUARY 672.63 21.7 21.7 3.22% MARSLAND TO CLOVELLY COAST 931.72 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.04% MENEAGE COASTAL SECTION 78.46 0.2 0.2 0.22% MIDDLE HOPE 84.39 16.9 16.9 19.97% NEWTOWN HARBOUR 615.81 204.3 41.1 245.4 39.84% NORTH DARTMOOR 13,559.36 1,008.4 1,008.4 7.44% NORTH YORK MOORS 44,095.15 153.3 588.8 742.1 1.68% OLD BODNEY CAMP 32.76 32.6 32.6 99.45% OTMOOR 212.99 26.5 131.4 157.8 74.11% OTTERBURN MIRES 293.58 105.3 188.3 293.6 100.00% PARSONAGE DOWN 187.64 0.8 0.8 0.40% PENHALE DUNES 626.25 0.9 0.9 0.14% PLYMOUTH SOUND SHORES AND CLIFFS 44.29 2.7 2.7 6.12% PORTON DOWN 1,562.32 232.0 1,330.0 1,561.9 99.98% PORTSDOWN 69.15 21.6 21.6 31.19% PORTSMOUTH HARBOUR 1,264.21 2.5 19.4 0.1 21.9 1.73% POVINGTON AND GRANGE HEATHS 1,217.09 111.2 967.7 2.4 1,081.4 88.85% PRESTWICK CARR 50.47 25.3 25.1 50.5 100.00% PURBECK RIDGE (WEST) 144.66 91.0 91.0 62.92% RAF LAKENHEATH 111.00 110.9 110.9 99.87% RAME HEAD & WHITSAND BAY 161.06 50.9 50.9 31.63% RAMSEY'S BURN WOOD 11.88 11.9 11.9 100.00% RIPON PARKS 137.01 16.8 13.5 0.7 31.0 22.61% RIVER AVON SYSTEM 475.94 8.3 20.5 4.7 33.4 7.03% RIVER COQUET AND COQUET VALLEY WOODLANDS 1,185.46 60.2 30.5 90.6 7.65% RIVER EDEN AND TRIBUTARIES 2,448.66 12.6 3.0 15.6 0.64% RIVER FROME 151.45 0.4 0.4 0.26% RIVER TEST 437.75 4.3 3.3 0.6 8.2 1.87% RIVER TILL 34.26 0.7 0.7 2.04% RIVER URE BANK, RIPON PARKS 1.68 0.6 0.6 38.10% RIVER WYE 906.11 24.8 24.8 2.74% ROMAN RIVER 282.00 272.9 272.9 96.77% SALISBURY PLAIN 19,715.99 2,824.0 16,877.2 19,701.2 99.93% SALTFLEETBY - THEDDLETHORPE DUNES 971.86 271.7 79.1 350.8 36.09% SANDLINGS FOREST 2,483.78 0.1 0.1 0.01% SCRATCHBURY & COTLEY HILLS 53.32 49.5 3.8 53.2 99.77% SEABROOK STREAM 24.13 8.1 7.6 15.7 64.94% SEFTON COAST 4,634.05 73.2 55.8 1.2 130.1 2.81% SEVERN ESTUARY 10,001.17 45.0 45.0 0.45% SHORTHEATH COMMON 59.77 0.1 0.1 0.10% SIMONSIDE HILLS 2,082.60 11.5 241.9 253.4 12.17% SOUTH DORSET COAST 1,591.68 308.4 351.0 61.2 720.6 45.27% SOUTH THAMES ESTUARY AND MARSHES 5,288.98 144.2 4.3 148.5 2.81% SPADEADAM MIRES 1,135.94 1,014.5 30.9 1,045.4 92.03% ST JOHN'S LAKE 266.43 125.7 100.8 226.5 85.01% STANFORD TRAINING AREA 4,677.96 1,964.6 1,893.1 210.4 589.8 4,657.9 99.57% STOKEFORD HEATHS 177.27 0.1 0.1 0.03% STONESBY QUARRY 3.22 0.0 0.0 0.93% STRENSALL COMMON 572.00 163.1 364.9 527.9 92.29% SUTTON AND HOLLESLEY HEATHS 483.26 0.1 11.4 11.5 2.38% TAMAR - TAVY ESTUARY 1,413.74 110.3 110.3 7.80% TAW-TORRIDGE ESTUARY 1,375.15 3.3 3.3 0.24% THE WASH 62,045.79 4,560.3 356.9 4,917.1 7.93% THE WILD GROUNDS 28.16 0.0 0.0 0.04% THETFORD HEATHS 270.58 0.2 153.8 154.0 56.91% THORNESS BAY 86.36 8.9 0.1 9.0 10.39% THURSLEY, HANKLEY & FRENSHAM COMMONS 1,880.30 488.7 141.7 630.4 33.53% TIDDESLEY WOOD 80.86 0.1 0.1 0.16% TITTERSTONE CLEE 421.28 0.0 0.0 0.00% TOWER HILL TO COCKHAM WOOD 48.77 18.3 18.3 37.46% TURNERS PUDDLE HEATH 390.99 61.9 279.1 341.0 87.21% UPPER SOLWAY FLATS & MARSHES 12,950.25 0.1 0.1 0.00% UPTON COW DOWN 16.97 6.3 6.3 37.36% WANGFORD WARREN AND CARR 67.79 3.1 3.1 4.56% WEST LIZARD 775.83 133.0 133.0 17.15% WHITEWATER VALLEY 4.30 2.1 2.1 49.30% WHITFIELD MOOR, PLENMELLER AND ASHOLME COMMONS 7,090.46 0.2 0.2 0.00% WICK WOOD AND WORLDHAM HANGERS 91.85 0.0 0.0 0.01% WOOLMER FOREST 1,298.65 28.0 1,046.8 1.1 1,075.9 82.85% YARDLEY CHASE 357.61 11.4 137.1 15.3 163.8 45.81% Grand Total 25,717.0 44,026.6 611.8 1,015.5 2.4 1.3 71,374.6 Highways Agency Latest Condition Description Percent SSSI held UNFAVOURABLE UNFAVOURABLE UNFAVOURABLE Highways SSSI name Whole SSSI area (ha) FAVOURABLE PART DESTROYED DESTROYED by RECOVERING NO CHANGE DECLINING Agency area Highways Agency ASTON ROWANT 126.24 16.9 16.9 13.40% ASTON ROWANT CUTTING 3.78 3.7 3.7 97.88% CASTLETHORPE TUFAS 0.53 0.2 0.2 41.51% DEVIL'S DYKE 39.77 10.3 3.6 13.8 34.75% FOLKESTONE WARREN 316.29 59.1 6.5 65.6 20.75% HOOK MOOR 1.92 1.9 1.9 98.96% KENNET AND LAMBOURN FLOODPLAIN 23.03 0.8 1.7 2.5 11.03% ORWELL ESTUARY 1,335.53 465.6 26.5 492.1 36.85% POTTER & SCARNING FENS, EAST DEREHAM 6.12 3.4 3.4 55.56% RIVER BLYTHE 61.95 33.5 33.5 54.03% RIVER COQUET AND COQUET VALLEY WOODLANDS 1,185.46 10.0 316.6 326.6 27.55% RIVER ITCHEN 748.50 105.8 44.3 150.1 20.05% RIVER KENNET 111.55 16.9 16.9 15.11% RIVER LAMBOURN 28.82 16.3 16.3 56.66% RIVER LUGG 142.43 79.3 79.3 55.68% RIVER SEVERN AT MONTFORD 27.22 14.8 14.8 54.48% RIVER TEST 437.75 2.6 2.8 18.8 24.2 5.52% RIVER WYE 906.11 115.3 637.5 752.8 83.08% SEVERN ESTUARY 10,001.17 1,440.6 19.7 1,460.2 14.60% SHERRARDSPARK WOOD 74.40 18.9 18.9 25.38% SLOP BOG AND UDDENS HEATH 43.91 22.0 12.6 5.1 39.6 90.28% SOUTHFIELD FARM MARSH 9.17 1.9 3.2 1.1 6.2 67.72% SUGWORTH 0.58 0.6 0.6 100.00% TEBAY ROAD CUTTINGS 9.71 9.7 9.7 100.00% THERFIELD HEATH 146.52 55.9 55.9 38.17% THURSLEY, HANKLEY & FRENSHAM COMMONS 1,880.30 314.5 163.4 477.8 25.41% TITSEY WOODS 45.35 5.1 31.5 36.6 80.62% Grand Total 2,492.2 1,433.3 129.8 58.8 6.1 4,120.3 Local Authorities SSSI unit condition (ha) Local Whole SSSI area UNFAVOURABLE UNFAVOURABLE NO UNFAVOURABLE Percent SSSI held by SSSI name FAVOURABLE PART DESTROYED DESTROYED Authorities (ha) RECOVERING CHANGE DECLINING Local Authorities area ABBEY WOOD 6.71 6.7 6.7 100.00% AIRE POINT TO CARRICK DU 598.23 17.6 17.6 2.94% ALDE-ORE ESTUARY 2,533.94 108.7 108.7 4.29% ALDERFORD COMMON 17.49 17.5 17.5 100.00% ALLINGTON QUARRY 0.84 0.8 0.8 100.00% AMBERSHAM COMMON 141.63 0.8
Recommended publications
  • Annex 7: Completed Workbook Trial for New Anglia
    Annex 7: Completed workbook trial for New Anglia RPA | Annexes Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) project researcher workbook April 2013 1 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Organizational details Name of LEP: New Anglia Lead responsible officer for LEP Name: Role: Address: Telephone number: Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: Researcher Name: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Organization: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Role: Address: Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Rd, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT Telephone number: 01508 528465 Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: [email protected] 2 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. One page initial summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. The geographical area of the LEP ............................................................................................ 7 1.2. Description of the economy of the area ................................................................................. 7 1.3. Challenges faced by the economy .......................................................................................... 8 1.4. The plausible future development pathway ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report
    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report Final September 2011 Prepared for South Essex: Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule South Essex Water Cycle Study September 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2011 D132233: S. Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Carl Pelling Essex Outline Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant WCS – First Draft_v1 02 August 2011 Final Draft Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Carl Pelling Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Principal Consultant 03 September Final Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2011 Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Technical Director URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 www.urs-scottwilson.com South Essex Water Cycle Study Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council and Rochford District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Loe Bar to Mullion Cove
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Penzance to St Mawes PSM 4: Loe Bar to Mullion Cove Part 4.1: Introduction Start Point: Loe Bar (grid reference: SW64142425) End Point: Mullion Cove (grid reference: SW66771787) Re le vant M aps: PSM 4a to PSM 4e 4.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between Penzance and St Mawes. 4.1.2 This report covers length PSM 4 of the stretch, which is the coast between Loe Bar and Mullion Cove. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 4.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
    [Show full text]
  • Boxford • Edwardstone • Groton • Little Waldingfield • Newton Green Vol 19 No 8 RBEV Roob Mxov ESR in Iver News
    August 2019 Boxford • Edwardstone • Groton • Little Waldingfield • Newton Green Vol 19 No 8 RBEV RoOB MxOV ESR IN iver News ‘Bishop’s Move’! Revd Rob standing in front of the removals van outside the rectory in Boxford after he moved from Orpington to Boxford on 10th July. In welcoming Rob and his family to the benefice, we hope that his next ‘bishop’s move’ won’t occur for many years yet! TEAM ITFC CYCLE TO AMSTERDAM FOR PROSTATE CHARITY INSTITUTION AND INDUCTION of THE REVD ROBERT PARKER-McGEE as RECTOR OF THE BOX RIVER BENEFICE Tuesday 20 August 2019 at 7.30 pm St Lawrenceʼs Church, Little Waldingfield Guests at Stoke by Nayland Hotel, were joined by a few familiar faces on Friday 7th June, as former ITFC midfielder Simon Milton and his team of ALL ARE WELCOME TO THIS SERVICE charity cyclists rode in for lunch on their way from Ipswich to Amsterdam. WHEN ROB IS FORMALLY COMMISSIONED The annual charity bike ride in aid of Prostate Cancer UK, sees teams of fans and former professional footballers cycle from as far afield as London and TO START HIS MINISTRY AMONG US Yorkshire to Amsterdam. Team ITFC, which comprised of 21 riders including Town legends Titus DO COME ! Bramble and Alan Lee, set off from Ipswich on Friday 7th June. Cycling across the East Anglian countryside on Friday, the team stopped at the Hotel Refreshments will be served after the service. to fill up on an energising lunch, before setting off to Harwich where they arrived safely (though a little wet!) on Friday evening.
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Draft Version June 2006)
    (Internal Draft Version June 2006) THURROCK LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (LDF) SITE SPECIFIC ALLOCATIONS AND POLICIES “ISSUES AND OPTIONS” DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT [DPD] INFORMAL CONSULTATION DRAFT CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. STRATEGIC & POLICY CONTEXT 4 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BOROUGH 6 4. KEY PRINCIPLES 7 5. RELATIONSHIP WITH CORE STRATEGY VISION, 7 OBJECTIVES & ISSUES 6. SITE SPECIFIC PROVISIONS 8 7. MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION 19 8. NEXT STEPS 19 APPENDICES 20 GLOSSARY OF TERMS REFERENCE LIST INTERNAL DRAFT VERSION JUNE 2006 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 We would like to get your views on future development and planning of Thurrock to 2021. A new system of “Spatial Planning” has been introduced that goes beyond traditional land-use planning and seeks to integrate the various uses of land with the various activities that people use land for. The new spatial plans must involve wider community consultation and involvement and be based on principles of sustainable development. 1.2 The main over-arching document within the LDF portfolio is the Core Strategy. This sets out the vision, objectives and strategy for the development of the whole area of the borough. The Site Specific Allocations and Policies is very important as it underpins the delivery of the Core Strategy. It enables the public to be consulted on the various specific site proposals that will guide development in accordance with the Core Strategy. 1.3 Many policies in the plans will be implemented through the day-to-day control of development through consideration of planning applications. This document also looks at the range of such Development Control policies that might be needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation
    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury
    Special Qualities of the Dedham Vale AONB Evaluation of Area Between Bures and Sudbury Final Report July 2016 Alison Farmer Associates 29 Montague Road Cambridge CB4 1BU 01223 461444 [email protected] In association with Julie Martin Associates and Countryscape 2 Contents 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Appointment............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background and Scope of Work.............................................................................. 3 1.3 Natural England Guidance on Assessing Landscapes for Designation ................... 5 1.4 Methodology and Approach to the Review .............................................................. 6 1.5 Format of Report ..................................................................................................... 7 2: The Evaluation Area ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Landscape Character Assessments as a Framework ............................................. 8 2.2 Defining and Reviewing the Evaluation Area Extent ................................................ 9 3: Designation History ..................................................................................................... 10 3.1 References to the Wider Stour Valley in the Designation of the AONB ................. 10 3.2 Countryside Commission Designation
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Yatural Area: 23. Lincolnshire Marsh and Geological Significance: Notable Coast (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the Lincolnshire Marsh and Coast Natural Area is bminated by Cretaceous chalk (approximately 97-83 Ma) although the later Quaternary deposits (the last 2 Ma) give thc area its overall. charactcr. 'The chalk is only well exposed on thc south bank of the Humber, where quarries and cuttings providc exposures of the Upper Cretaceous Chalk. 'me chalk is a very pure limestone deposited on the floor of a tropical sea. During Quaternary timcs, the area was glaciated on several occasions and as a result the area is covered by a variety of glacial deposits, representing an unknown number of glacial ('lcc Age') and interglacial phases. rhe glacial deposits consist mainly of sands, gravels and clays in variable thicknesses. These are derived primarily from the erosion of surrounding bedrock and therefore tend to have similar lithological characteristics, usually with a high chalk content. The glacial deposits are particularly important because of the controversy surrounding their correlation with the timing and sequence in other parts of England, especially East Anglia. The Quaternary deposits are well exposed in coastal cliffs of the area. Key geological features: Coastal cliffs consisting of glacial sands, gravels and clays Exposures of Cretaceous chalk Number of GCR sites: Oxfordian: 1 Kimmeridgian: I Aptian-Rlbian: i Quaternary of Eastern England: 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ GeologicaVgeomorphological SSSI coverage: 'here are 2 (P)SSSIs in the Natural Area covering 4 GCR SlLs which represent 4 different GCR networks. The site coverage includes South Ferriby Chalk Pit SSSI which contains an important Upper Jurassic succession, overlain by Cretaceous deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    EA - Southern EA LEAPs local environment agency plan MEDWAY LEAP ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW JANUARY 1999 EAST GRINSTEAD I En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y Medway Area Key Details General Water Quality Area (sq km) 1780.99 River ecosystem classification as % of the Medway catchment between 1995-1997 Administrative Details Class Councils and % of the RE1 8 Kent Area they Administer RE2 30 Kent CC 67.1 RE3 12 Medway C 9.9 RE4 15 Surrey CC 8.2 RE5 1 East Sussex CC 12.5 Chemical GQA as % of sites in each class for West Sussex CC 2.3 the Medway catchment rivers in 1995 Class Population A 9 Year Population B 35 1991 734 000 C 35 2001 (Estimate) 755 000 D * 14 E 6 F 1 Water Resources Rainfall (mm/yr) Average 729 Pollution Prevention & Control Drought Conditions 571 Licensed Waste Sites 96 Number of licensed abstractions Surface Water 265 Process Industry Regulations Groundwater 201 21 (PIus two proposed) Impoundments 42 Radioactive Substance Regulations Authorised sites to accumulate and dispose of Conservation radioactive waste 8. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 49 Water Dependant SSSIs 30 Special Areas of Conservation 0 Flood Defence Special Protection Areas 0 Length (km) Ramsar Sites 3 Main River including tidal lengths 259.74 National Nature Reserves 2 Sea Defences Agency responsibility 11.66 Local Nature Reserves 0 Tidal Banks 55.33 Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty 0 Length of Inland Navigation 31km Fisheries Length of EC Designated Fisheries (km): Cyprinid Freshwater 87.2 Tidal 0 Salmonid Freshwater Bewl Water Tidal 0 DPC This book is due for return on or before the last date shown below.
    [Show full text]