DOCSLIB.ORG

Sanctuary Team the Defence Estates Lands Is That I Don’T Know Them

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SUSTAINABILITY MAGAZINE Number 46 • 2017 HMS QE AIRCRAFT CARRIER Mud, mines and mitigation OPERATION NIGHTINGALE Archaeological projects benefit recovery of service personnel DIO DELIVERS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE OVERSEAS in support of new military requirements Foreword by Chris Packham Naturalist and Broadcaster Editors Paradoxically what I like most about DIO Sanctuary Team the Defence Estates lands is that I don’t know them. I’ve visited most Editorial Board of the nature reserves and parks Jane Hallett (Chair) across the UK but only on a handful Richard Brooks of times have I enjoyed access to the vast swathes of countryside Contact managed by the military. And all Defence Infrastructure have been such a treat. I recall with Organisation (DIO), Building enormous fondness a damp day 21, Westdown Camp, Tilshead, on Porton Down in Wiltshire in the Salisbury, SP3 4RS 1980’s when I was shown a fabulous roost of short-eared owls and more [email protected] juniper scrub than I’d ever seen. 01980 674807 You see, I approve of their lack of access, their level of protection in Sanctuary is an annual publication our overcrowded, over-trampled age about sustainable development in and I am reassured that they remain the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and properly protected and managed the sustainable management of with the natural environment in the natural and built assets across mind. Indeed this years Sanctuary the Defence estate. It illustrates Award winners celebrate the how the MOD is undertaking its conservation of Natterjack toads responsibility for stewardship of on Longmoor Camp, the superb educational resource at Foxglove Covert and the the estate in the UK and overseas. extraordinary long term commitment of Roy Canham safeguarding the archaeological It is designed for a wide audience, treasures on Salisbury Plain. Congratulations and thanks to these and all the other from the general public, to worthy nominees. the people who work for us or volunteer as members of the MOD However, this magazine also throws focus on the considerable and successful Conservation Groups. efforts of MOD staff and partners working overseas. I’m particularly drawn to the potentially positive aspects of the reactivation of military training in Belize, a country Sanctuary is produced for the with significant but imperilled natural resources. Reduction of illegal logging and MOD by the Defence Infrastructure hunting and protecting the endangered scarlet macaw, a rain forest icon , would be Organisation. an enormously beneficial aspect of the British Army’s renewed presence. Likewise in Laikipia - Kenya, where a training exercise helped consolidate economic security in a Sanctuary has been printed region fraught with conflict and difficulties. Conservation management and sustainable by the kind sponsorship of the building in the Falklands also exemplify the expanding and flourishing stewardship of Industry Partners below: the Defence Estates, not only at home but all over the world. Top work! I salute you! (If civilians are allowed to do that!) SANCTUARY 46 • 2017 59 Recording the Unique Built Heritage at AWE Sanctuary Awards 60 Breeding Birds of Conservation Concern on the Otterburn Training Area 2 The Sanctuary Awards 2016 62 Public Access on the MOD Estate. The Importance of 2 The Sanctuary Awards 2017 Working Together 64 Seals, sea shells and shifting shorelines. A partnership Sanctuary Features approach to Marine Protected Area management 66 Waste Management Innovations 8 UK Military Training in Belize, considering 67 Powered by Nature – vehicles overseas the Environment 68 Acacia Management on the British Sovereign 11 Operation Nightingale Bases Cyprus 12 A Room with a View. East Chisenbury in the Iron Age 70 The Dstl Porton Down Stone-curlew Conservation Project 14 Climate Change Resilience across the Defence Estate 72 Headley’s Roman Sarcophagus 16 Yardley Chase – A hidden jewel 74 Studying dolphins of the kelp. Falkland Islands 18 Assuring the Future of Britain’s Military Sites of Historic Importance 76 Tree Health. Sennybridge and the wider MOD Estate 20 Pippingford Park CPTA. 30 years of bird surveying 78 Aspire creates a new Dukedom at Larkhill Garrison 22 Defence Munitions Environmental Risk Assessments 24 Provision of Bare Ground Patches for Insects on Sanctuary Around the Regions Lowland Heathland Sites 26 New Pine Rows at Stanford Training Area 80 Spotlight on Foxglove Covert 27 Without a Trace. Safeguarding the Defence 83 Monmouthshire, Caerwent Training Estate 84 Pembrokeshire, Castlemartin 28 Maximising MOD Energy Efficient Behaviours 85 Gibraltar, Raptor Unit 30 Bourley and Long Valley SSSI Turf Stripping Project 86 Isle of Wight, Newtown Range 32 The Ancient Akrotiri Project Dreamer’s Bay and its Environs 87 Wiltshire, Larkhill and Westdown 34 A Matter of Holes and Ditches. New Archaeological 88 Wiltshire, Porton Down Discoveries at Larkhill 89 Anglesey, RAF Valley 36 Mud, mines and the MOD, making space for nature and HMS Queen Elizabeth 90 Kent and East Sussex, SD Training South East 39 Microplastics. Stemming the Tide at Tregantle 91 Scotland, Moray, RAF Lossiemouth 40 Space for Giants and Soldiers on Loisaba 92 Home Counties, SD Training 43 Conservation at East Cove Port 94 Oxfordshire, Bicester 44 The Roman Eagle and the White Ensign 95 Germany, Senne Training Area 46 Making Plants Count on the Defence Estate 96 Cornwall, Penhale 48 Project ANEMOI delivering sustainability remotely 97 Essex, Fingringhoe Ranges 50 Water Consumption reduction. Managing a 98 Devon, Britannia Royal Naval College precious resource 99 Wiltshire, Imber Conservation Group 52 The Return of the Native 100 Environmental Support & Compliance Update 54 MOD Shoeburyness Sea Defences 101 Contacts 56 Operation MARMAT SANCTUARY 46 • 2017 1 SANCTUARY Awards Recognition for outstanding achievement The Ceremony 2016 Each year the launch of Sanctuary Magazine coincides with the Award Ceremony, which is held at Main Building in London and co- hosted by the Minister for Defence, Veterans, Reserves and Personnel and the Defence Infrastructure Organisation Chief Executive Officer, with the Head Office and Commissioning Services (Sustainability Lead for MOD), senior military staff and Sustainability Champions from across all of the armed services and other MOD departments in attendance. Looking back, last year’s ceremony was a great success with the Minister Mark Lancaster presenting the Awards to the winners on stage, he said: ”Today is all about celebrating the men and women responsible for a remarkable and diverse range of sustainability, conservation and environmental projects and initiatives delivered across the Defence estate on behalf of the MOD each year. The diversity of these brilliant projects is dazzling.” The Sanctuary Awards board for 2017 comprised of: FINANCE AND MILITARY CAPABILITY (FMC) Jane Hallett Deputy Head Estates Policy Pippa Morrison Sustainable MOD Policy DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION (DIO) Award winners of 2016 with co-hosts Mark Lancaster MP and Graham Dalton DIO CEO © Crown Alan Mayes Chief of Staff Service Delivery Richard Brooks Sanctuary Awards 2017 Principal Environmental Advisor at ES&C The Ministry of Defence (MOD) prestigious Sanctuary Awards recognises and encourages group and individual efforts that benefit sustainable development, Mark Hill energy saving measures, wildlife, archaeology, environmental improvement or Deputy Head community awareness of conservation on or within land and property that the MOD Energy, Utilities & Sustainability owns or uses in the UK and overseas. EXTERNAL JUDGES The 2017 Awards were divided into five categories: Environmental Project, Heritage Martin Baxter Project, Sustainability Project, Utilities Project and Individual Achievement. The Chief Policy Advisor at the Institute winners of each category were then considered for two further awards. of Environmental Management & Assessment (IEMA) The coveted Silver Otter is awarded to Conservation Groups or individuals, MOD personnel or MOD-led projects. The Sustainable Business Award is awarded to more Marcus Yeo commercial projects who have achieved a particular success in ensuring sustainable Managing Director of the Joint solutions that deliver against the commitment to the armed forces by enabling them Nature Conservation Council (JNCC) to live, train and work. The Judges would like to thank The Sanctuary Award board would like to congratulate, on behalf of the MOD, the Samantha Bevan-Talbot Commerce following winners and runners-up for 2017. Decisions QinetiQ for her assistance with the Award Tool. For further information on entering the 2018 Awards please contact the Sanctuary Team [email protected] 2 SANCTUARY 46 • 2017 INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT AWARD WINNER Roy Canham MBE. Without Roy the 2200 sites – each given their own unique measures. Roy was never less than archaeological landscape of Salisbury SPTA (Salisbury Plain Training Area) persistent and dogged in ensuring that Plain would have looked very different. In number on his database. all of these measures were adhered the 1970 increasing incidents of damage to - embarking, like a latter-day Daniel to monuments from armoured training Roy participated in often quite heated Defoe, on countless visits across the were being reported. As the County meetings with military commanders to Plain to audit signs and palisades, to Archaeologist for Wiltshire, Roy was well design measures to protect these sites check grazing, or to examine scrub aware not only of the
Recommended publications
  • Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment

    Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment

    Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment Project Name Aerodrome Road, Hawkinge Client Enzygo Site Address Hawkinge, Folkestone CT18 7AG Report Reference DA5936-00 th Date 6 March 2018 Originator JM Find us on Twitter and Facebook st 1 Line Defence Limited Company No: 7717863 VAT No: 128 8833 79 Unit 3, Maple Park, Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Herts. EN11 0EX www.1stlinedefence.co.uk Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 [email protected] Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment Aerodrome Road, Hawkinge Enzygo Executive Summary Site Location The site is located in Hawkinge, Kent. Aerodrome Road borders the site to the north, while Elvington Lane forms the eastern boundary. Areas of open ground border to the south and west. The boundary comprises areas of open ground and the foundations of previously demolished structures. The site is approximately centred on the OS grid reference: TR 2044639485. Proposed Works The proposed works are understood to involve the excavation of trial pits to a depth of up to 3m. Boreholes will also be drilled to a depth of 4m-6m below ground level depending on ground conditions. Geology and Bomb Penetration Depth The British Geological Survey (BGS) map shows the bedrock geology of the site to be underlain by the Pit Chalk Formation – chalk and sedimentary bedrock of the Cretaceous Period. The superficial deposits are comprised of Clay-with-flints Formation - clay, silt, sand and gravel of the Quaternary Period. Site specific geotechnical information was not available to 1st Line Defence at the time of the production of this report. An assessment of maximum bomb penetration depth can be made once such data becomes available, or by a UXO specialist during on-site support.
  • Downloadable Content the Supermarine

    Downloadable Content the Supermarine

    AIRFRAME & MINIATURE No.12 The Supermarine Spitfire Part 1 (Merlin-powered) including the Seafire Downloadable Content v1.0 August 2018 II Airframe & Miniature No.12 Spitfire – Foreign Service Foreign Service Depot, where it was scrapped around 1968. One other Spitfire went to Argentina, that being PR Mk XI PL972, which was sold back to Vickers Argentina in March 1947, fitted with three F.24 cameras with The only official interest in the Spitfire from the 8in focal length lens, a 170Imp. Gal ventral tank Argentine Air Force (Fuerca Aerea Argentina) was and two wing tanks. In this form it was bought by an attempt to buy two-seat T Mk 9s in the 1950s, James and Jack Storey Aerial Photography Com- PR Mk XI, LV-NMZ with but in the end they went ahead and bought Fiat pany and taken by James Storey (an ex-RAF Flt Lt) a 170Imp. Gal. slipper G.55Bs instead. F Mk IXc BS116 was allocated to on the 15th April 1947. After being issued with tank installed, it also had the Fuerca Aerea Argentina, but this allocation was the CofA it was flown to Argentina via London, additional fuel in the cancelled and the airframe scrapped by the RAF Gibraltar, Dakar, Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Montevi- wings and fuselage before it was ever sent. deo and finally Buenos Aires, arriving at Morón airport on the 7th May 1947 (the exhausts had burnt out en route and were replaced with those taken from JF275). Storey hoped to gain an aerial mapping contract from the Argentine Government but on arrival was told that his ‘contract’ was not recognised and that his services were not required.
  • A Literature Review of Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and Their Wildlife

    A Literature Review of Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and Their Wildlife

    Report Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife J C Underhill-Day RSPB, Syldata Arne, Wareham Dorset BH20 5BJ Telephone: 01929 550969 email: [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Executive summary Introduction Heather clad lowland heath developed on light, freely draining, acid soils following prehistoric woodland clearance, and down the centuries, has been kept open by grazing, burning and cutting. As the economic value of these uses declined, considerable areas of heath were lost to agriculture, forestry, housing, roads, mineral working and other uses, and today, much of what is left is adjacent to built up areas, especially in Dorset. These lowland heathland fragments can be found across much of southern England on suitable soils. Much of the research on heathlands over the last twenty years has concentrated on the Dorset heaths, which are now almost all SSSIs and mostly within the Dorset Heathland SPA. While this report reflects the bias in the literature towards work in Dorset, the results have wide applicability to urban heathlands that are accessed by the surrounding urban populations for amenity and recreation whether in Dorset or elsewhere. This urban public access places considerable pressures on the heaths, for example through disturbance, wild fires, trampling, predation by domestic pets, pollution and enrichment.
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report

    Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report

    Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report Appendix A: Consultee responses to the scoping report and amendments made as a consequence November 30, 2017 Version 1 Appendix A Statement of Response Southern Water issued its Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping Report for its Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 for public consultation from 28th April 2017 to 2nd June 2017. Comments on the SEA Scoping Report were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England Howard Taylor, Upstream Dry Fly Sussex Wildlife Trust The Test & Itchen Association Ltd Wessex Chalk Stream Rivers Trust Forestry Commission England Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Longdown Management Limited Amanda Barker-Mill C. H. Layman These comments are set out in Table 1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it intends to take account of them in developing the SEA of the Draft Water Resources Management Plan. Table 1 Draft Water Resources Management Plan: SEA Scoping Report – responses to comments received How comments have been addressed in the Ref Consultee Comment Draft Water Resources Management Plan Environmental Report Plans programmes or policies I recommend you add the following to your list of plans programmes or policies: National. - Defra strategy for the environment creating a great place for These policies, plans and programmes have Natural living. been included in the SEA Environmental Report 1 England - The national conservation strategy conservation-21 and considered in the assessment of potential effects of the WRMP. - The 5 point plan to salmon conservation in the UK National Nature Reserve Management Plans (though you may not be able to, or need to, list all of these, please just reference them as a source of information for assessment of any relevant options).
  • Nepal, November 2005

    Nepal, November 2005

    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Nepal, November 2005 COUNTRY PROFILE: NEPAL November 2005 COUNTRY Formal Name: Kingdom of Nepal (“Nepal Adhirajya” in Nepali). Short Form: Nepal. Term for Citizen(s): Nepalese. Click to Enlarge Image Capital: Kathmandu. Major Cities: According to the 2001 census, only Kathmandu had a population of more than 500,000. The only other cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants were Biratnagar, Birgunj, Lalitpur, and Pokhara. Independence: In 1768 Prithvi Narayan Shah unified a number of states in the Kathmandu Valley under the Kingdom of Gorkha. Nepal recognizes National Unity Day (January 11) to commemorate this achievement. Public Holidays: Numerous holidays and religious festivals are observed in particular regions and by particular religions. Holiday dates also may vary by year and locality as a result of the multiple calendars in use—including two solar and three lunar calendars—and different astrological calculations by religious authorities. In fact, holidays may not be observed if religious authorities deem the date to be inauspicious for a specific year. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Sahid Diwash (Martyrs’ Day; movable date in January); National Unity Day and birthday of Prithvi Narayan Shah (January 11); Maha Shiva Ratri (Great Shiva’s Night, movable date in February or March); Rashtriya Prajatantra Diwash (National Democracy Day, movable date in February); Falgu Purnima, or Holi (movable date in February or March); Ram Nawami (Rama’s Birthday, movable date in March or April); Nepali New Year (movable date in April); Buddha’s Birthday (movable date in April or May); King Gyanendra’s Birthday (July 7); Janai Purnima (Sacred Thread Ceremony, movable date in August); Children’s Day (movable date in August); Dashain (Durga Puja Festival, movable set of five days over a 15-day period in September or October); Diwali/Tihar (Festival of Lights and Laxmi Puja, movable set of five days in October); and Sambhidhan Diwash (Constitution Day, movable date in November).
  • Conservation Grazing.Pdf

    Conservation Grazing.Pdf

    MINNESOTA WETLAND RESTORATION GUIDE CONSERVATION GRAZING TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Document No.: WRG 6A-5 Publication Date: 1/30/2014 Table of Contents Introduction Application Other Considerations Costs Additional References INTRODUCTION Grazing by bison, elk and deer was historically a natural occurrence in grassland and shrubland plant communities in Minnesota. This grazing tended to be nomadic in nature and its intensity depended on the type of grazers, herd sizes, climate conditions, fire frequency, and the composition and structure of individual plant communities. Today conservation grazing is conducted by a variety of species including cattle, bison, horses, sheep, and goats to target specific invasive plants, or to replicate the grassland plant community structure and diversity that historically resulted from grazing. When grazing is conducted to control invasive species the intensity and duration of grazing is carefully monitored to ensure that target species are managed effectively, and that the integrity of the plant community is maintained. Most conservation grazing involves a short pulse of grazing followed by a long rest. Grazing can have benefits as well as negative impacts, so it is important to involve experienced professionals. Detailed grazing plans are an important component in the planning and implementation of prescribed grazing. Equipment that may be needed for grazing includes watering systems, electric, or barb”ed” wire fences around rotational grazing areas, moveable fencing to concentrate grazing and to ensure that areas are not overgrazed, and in some cases salt licks to concentrate animals (Tu et al. 2001). The following is a list of species commonly used for conservation grazing and their general characteristics.
  • Myth and Reality in the Battle Between the Pygmies and the Cranes in the Greek and Roman Worlds

    Myth and Reality in the Battle Between the Pygmies and the Cranes in the Greek and Roman Worlds

    ARTÍCULOS Gerión. Revista de historia Antigua ISSN: 0213-0181 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/GERI.56960 Myth and Reality in the Battle between the Pygmies and the Cranes in the Greek and Roman Worlds Asher Ovadiah1; Sonia Mucznik2 Recibido: 19 de septiembre de 2016 / Aceptado: 23 de marzo de 2017 Abstract. Ancient writers, such as Homer, Aesop, Hecataeus of Miletus, Herodotus, Aristotle, Philostratus, Pliny the Elder, Juvenal and others have often referred to the enmity and struggle between the Pygmies and the Cranes. It seems that this folk-tale was conveyed to the Greeks through Egyptian sources. Greek and Roman visual works of art depict the Pygmies fighting against the vigorous and violent attack of the birds, which in some cases was vicious. This article sets out to examine the reasons for the literary and artistic portrayals of the Battle between the Pygmies and the Cranes (Geranomachy) in the context of the migration of the cranes in the autumn from the Caucasus (Scythian plains) to Central (Equatorial) Africa. In addition, an attempt will be made to clarify whether the literary sources and visual works of art reflect myth and/or reality. Keywords: Egypt; Ethiopia; Geranomachy; Migration; Nile; Scythia; Trojans. [en] Mito y realidad en la batalla entre los pigmeos y las grullas en el mundo griego y romano Resumen. Escritores antiguos, tales como Homero, Esopo, Hecateo de Mileto, Herodoto, Aristóteles, Filóstrato, Plinio el Viejo, Juvenal y otros se refirieron frecuentemente a la enemistad y guerra entre los pigmeos y las grullas. Es posible que este cuento popular fuese transmitido a los griegos a través de fuentes egipcias.
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02

    Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02

    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
  • Management of Grazing Animals for Environmental Quality

    Management of Grazing Animals for Environmental Quality

    Management of grazing animals for environmental quality Etienne M. in Molina Alcaide E. (ed.), Ben Salem H. (ed.), Biala K. (ed.), Morand-Fehr P. (ed.). Sustainable grazing, nutritional utilization and quality of sheep and goat products Zaragoza : CIHEAM Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 67 2005 pages 225-235 Article available on line / Article disponible en ligne à l’adresse : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=6600046 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ To cite this article / Pour citer cet article -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Etienne M. Management of grazing animals for environmental quality. In : Molina Alcaide E. (ed.), Ben Salem H. (ed.), Biala K. (ed.), Morand-Fehr P. (ed.). Sustainable grazing, nutritional utilization and quality of sheep and goat products . Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 2005. p. 225-235 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 67) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ http://www.ciheam.org/
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf

    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf

    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
  • Rvk-Diss Digi

    Rvk-Diss Digi

    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Kurzfassungen Der Vorträge Der Mikrolepidopteren-Tagung: 8-12, Schwerin

    Kurzfassungen Der Vorträge Der Mikrolepidopteren-Tagung: 8-12, Schwerin

    Virgo, Mitteilungsblatt des Entomologischen Vereins Mecklenburg, 12. Jahrgang (2009), Heft 1: Kurzfassungen der Vorträge der Mikrolepidopteren-Tagung: 8-12, Schwerin Kurzfassungen der Vorträge der Mikrolepidopteren-Tagung Stand der Erforschung der Unter ihnen waren auch folgende Bearbeiter für die Kleinschmetterlinge in Mecklenburg- „Kleinschmetterlinge“: Ab den 60-iger Jahren des vergangenen Vorpommern Jahrhunderts bis heute wurden unter anderen auch Kleinschmetterlinge in oder um die Urlaubsorte UWE DEUTSCHMANN, Buchholz durch Entomologen aus allen Teilen Deutschlands in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern nachgewiesen. Die Erforschung der mecklenburgischen Ab 1980 beschäftigt sich der Autor mit den Schmetterlingsfauna wurde von Gerrit Friese im Kleinschmetterlingen von Mecklenburg. Möglich „Archiv der Freunde der Naturgeschichte in war das auch durch die freundliche Unterstützung Mecklenburg“, Teil V, im Jahre 1959 erfahrener Entomologen, wie Herr Dr. Steuer aus veröffentlicht. Blankenburg, Herr Dr. Petersen und Herr Dr. Herr G. Friese stellte in seinem Beitrag die ihm Gaedicke aus Eberswalde oder Herr Patzak aus bekannten Schmetterlingssammler vor, die seit dem Aschersleben und Herrn Sutter aus Bitterfeld. 18. Jahrhundert auf dem Gebiet von Mecklenburg Durch die Veröffentlichungen von Sonderdrucken und Vorpommern Schmetterlinge gesammelt der im Rahmen der „Entomologischen Nachrichten haben. und Berichte“ erschienenen Bestimmungsliteratur Insgesamt konnte er das Leben und Wirken von 67 war es nun möglich, die gefangenen Tiere auch Schmetterlingssammlern, die er als die relativ sicher zu bestimmen. „bedeutendsten mecklenburgischen Lepidopterologen“ bezeichnete, in seinem Werk beschreiben. Name, Vorname Zeitraum der Sammeltätigkeit/ Sammelgebiet Sammeltätigkeit Dr. Herbert Buhr 1. Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts Minierinsekten Mecklenburgs, Nachweis von ca. 400 minierenden Kleinschmetterlingsarten in M. gemeinsam mit Prof. Dr. Hering,Berlin Dr. Gerrit Friese In den 50er Jahren des 20.