Site Improvement Plan Thames Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Site Improvement Plan Thames Basin Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Thames Basin Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway. The information in the SIPs will be used to update England's contribution to the UK's Prioritised Action Framework (PAF). The SIPs are not formal consultation documents, but if you have any comments about the SIP or would like more information please email us at [email protected], or contact Natural England's Responsible Officer for the site via our enquiry service 0300 060 3900, or [email protected] This Site Improvement Plan covers the following Natura 2000 site(s) UK9012141 Thames Basin Heaths SPA UK0012793 Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham SAC UK9012131 Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons SPA 1/20 Site description This is an extensive complex of lowland heathland, acid grassland, mire and commercial conifer plantations in south east England. The complex is made up by 14 component SSSIs and includes the Thames Basin Heaths SPA, Thursley, Ash, Pirbright and Chobham SAC and Thursley, Hankley and Frensham Commons SPA. The qualifying features present are Dartford warbler, woodlark, nightjar, depressions on peat, dry heath and wet heath. Plan Summary This table shows the prioritised issues for the site(s), the features they affect, the proposed measures to address the issues and the delivery bodies whose involvement is required to deliver the measures. The list of delivery bodies will include those who have agreed to the actions as well as those where discussions over their role in delivering the actions is on-going. Priority & Issue Pressure Feature(s) affected Measure Delivery Bodies or Threat 1 Public Pressure/ A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Agree and implement an Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Access/Disturbance Threat Dartford Warbler over-arching access Trust, Crown Estate (Rural), management strategy Forest Enterprise, Forestry Commission, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Local Authorities, National Trust, Natural England, RSPB, Surrey County Council, Surrey Heath Borough Council, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO), Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust (ARCT), Horsell Common Preservation Society, Local partnership 2 Undergrazing Pressure A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Agree and implement an National Trust, Natural England, Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved over-arching habitat RSPB, Defence Infrastructure heath, H4030 European dry heaths, H7150 Depressions on management strategy Organisation (DIO) peat substrates 3 Forestry and woodland Pressure A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Review and agree forestry Forest Enterprise, Natural management Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved plans/policies to ensure England, Defence Infrastructure heath, H4030 European dry heaths compatability with objectives Organisation (DIO), Crown Estate 2/20 4 Hydrological changes Threat H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved heath, H7150 Hydrological investigations Natural England, Surrey Wildlife Depressions on peat substrates Trust, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) 5 Inappropriate scrub Pressure A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Agree habitat management Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife control Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved stategies for all sites Trust, Bracknell Forest Borough heath, H4030 European dry heaths Council, Crown Estate (Rural), Forestry Commission, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Natural England, RSPB, Surrey County Council, Surrey Heath Borough Council, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Windsor and Maidenhead Royal Borough Council, Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust (ARCT) 6 Invasive species Pressure/ H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved heath, H4030 Agree and implement Hampshire and Isle of Wight Threat European dry heaths invasive control stategies at Wildlife Trust, Natural England, all relevant sites Surrey Wildlife Trust, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) 7 Wildfire/ arson Pressure A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Agree and implement fire risk Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved reduction stategies at all sites Trust, Forestry Commission, heath, H4030 European dry heaths, H7150 Depressions on Hampshire and Isle of Wight peat substrates Wildlife Trust, Hampshire County Council, Local Authorities, Natural England, Surrey County Council, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO), Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service, Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service , Surrey Fire and Rescue Service , Wildfire, Horsell Common Preservation Society, South East England Wildfire Group 3/20 8 Air Pollution: impact of Pressure/ A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Agree and implement Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife atmospheric nitrogen Threat Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved Nitrogen Trust, Hampshire and Isle of deposition heath, H4030 European dry heaths, H7150 Depressions on management/mitigation Wight Wildlife Trust, Hampshire peat substrates strategies at all sites County Council, Natural England, Surrey Heath Borough Council, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) 9 Feature location/ extent/ Threat A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Develop and implement Hampshire and Isle of Wight condition unknown Dartford Warbler improved bird monitoring Wildlife Trust, Natural England, strategy RSPB, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO), Surrey Bird Club 10 Military Threat A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Agree and implement Hampshire and Isle of Wight Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved integrated management Wildlife Trust, Natural England, heath, H4030 European dry heaths, H7150 Depressions on plans for military sites Surrey Wildlife Trust, Defence peat substrates Infrastructure Organisation (DIO), Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust (ARCT) 11 Habitat fragmentation Pressure A224(B) European nightjar, A246(B) Woodlark, A302(B) Commission study to identify Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Dartford Warbler, H4010 Wet heathland with cross-leaved habitat management priorities Trust, Bracknell Forest Borough heath, H4030 European dry heaths, H7150 Depressions on to reduce fragmentation Council, Crown Estate (Rural), peat substrates Forestry Commission, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Natural England, RSPB, Surrey Heath Borough Council, Surrey Wildlife Trust, Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust (ARCT) 4/20 Issues and Actions This table outlines the prioritised issues that are currently impacting or threatening the condition of the features, and the outstanding actions required to address them. It also shows, where possible, the estimated cost of the action and the delivery bodies whose involvement will be required to implement the action. Lead delivery bodies will be responsible for coordinating the implementation of the action, but not necessarily funding it. Delivery partners will need to support the lead delivery body in implementing the action. In the process of developing the SIPs Natural England has approached the delivery bodies to seek agreement on the actions and their roles in delivering them, although in some cases these discussions have not yet been concluded. Other interested parties, including landowners and managers, will be involved as the detailed actions are agreed and delivered. Funding options are indicated as potential (but not necessarily agreed or secured) sources to fund the actions. 1 Public Access/Disturbance Parts of Thames Basin Heaths (and Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons SPA) are subject to high levels of recreational use and dog walkers make up a large proportion of visitors. This is likely to be affecting the distribution and overall numbers of ground-nesting Annex 1 birds (and breeding success). An 'avoidance strategy'
Recommended publications
  • A Literature Review of Urban Effects on Lowland Heaths and Their Wildlife
    Report Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 623 A literature review of urban effects on lowland heaths and their wildlife J C Underhill-Day RSPB, Syldata Arne, Wareham Dorset BH20 5BJ Telephone: 01929 550969 email: [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Executive summary Introduction Heather clad lowland heath developed on light, freely draining, acid soils following prehistoric woodland clearance, and down the centuries, has been kept open by grazing, burning and cutting. As the economic value of these uses declined, considerable areas of heath were lost to agriculture, forestry, housing, roads, mineral working and other uses, and today, much of what is left is adjacent to built up areas, especially in Dorset. These lowland heathland fragments can be found across much of southern England on suitable soils. Much of the research on heathlands over the last twenty years has concentrated on the Dorset heaths, which are now almost all SSSIs and mostly within the Dorset Heathland SPA. While this report reflects the bias in the literature towards work in Dorset, the results have wide applicability to urban heathlands that are accessed by the surrounding urban populations for amenity and recreation whether in Dorset or elsewhere. This urban public access places considerable pressures on the heaths, for example through disturbance, wild fires, trampling, predation by domestic pets, pollution and enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening of Woking Borough Council's Draft Core Strategy Policies with Potential for Impacts on Natura 2000 and Ramsar Sites
    HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT SCREENING OF WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL'S DRAFT CORE STRATEGY POLICIES WITH POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL HRA SCREENING REPORT December 2011 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT SCREENING OF WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL'S DRAFT CORE STRATEGY POLICIES WITH POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL HRA SCREENING REPORT December 2011 Project Code: WBCSAC11B.9 Prepared by: Andrea Hughes – Mayer Brown/Chris Stapleton – Environmental Planner/Derek Finnie - Bioscan Issue Date: December 2011 . Status: FINAL Rev 4 Mayer Brown Limited, Lion House, Oriental Road, Wok ing, Surrey GU22 8AP Telephone 01483 750508 Fax 01483 767113 [email protected] www.MayerBrown.co.uk HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT SCREENING OF WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL'S DRAFT CORE STRATEGY POLICIES WITH POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR HRA SCREENING REPORT HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT SCREENING OF WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL'S DRAFT CORE STRATEGY POLICIES WITH POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES HRA SCREENING REPORT Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2. BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 8 3. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY – PHASE I .................................................................. 24 4. SCREENING ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation
    Get involved • Join Butterfly Conservation and help save butterflies and moths • Visit the website and subscribe to our Facebook and Twitter feeds Butterfly Conservation • Record your sightings and submit them, e.g. using the iRecord Surrey & SW London Branch Butterflies smartphone app • Join a field trip to see butterflies in their natural habitat • Take part in the Big Butterfly Count in July-August • Help the Branch survey for butterflies and moths • Have fun volunteering and get fit on a conservation work party • Help publicise the Branch’s work at public events • Walk a transect to monitor butterflies through the season • Take part in the Garden Moths Scheme • Get involved in helping to run the Branch © Bill Downey Bill © Conservation work party for the Small Blue Stepping Stones project About Butterfly Conservation Butterfly Conservation is the UK charity dedicated to saving butterflies and moths, which are key indicators of the health of our environment. Butterfly Conservation improves landscapes for butterflies and moths, creating a better environment for us all. Join at www.butterfly-conservation.org The Surrey & SW London Branch area covers the present county of Surrey (excluding Spelthorne) and the London Boroughs of Richmond, Wandsworth, Lambeth, Southwark, Kingston, Merton, Sutton and Croydon. See www.butterfly-conservation.org/surrey or phone 07572 612722. Butterfly Conservation is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468). Tel: 01929 400 209. Registered Office: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Dorset, BH20 5QP. Charity registered in England & Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268). Published by the Surrey & SW London Branch of Butterfly Conservation © 2018 Where to go What we do Everyone loves butterflies and we Monitoring and surveying are fortunate that 41 species can Volunteers walk weekly routes, be seen in Surrey, along with 500 called “transects”, on around 100 moths and 1,100 micro-moths.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)
    Runnymede 2030 Local Plan Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) April 2021 This page is intentionally blank 2 Foreword Guidance on the Council’s strategy to avoid and mitigate the impacts of development upon the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area is set out within this SPD, along with details of how Section 106 planning agreements and undertakings will operate once planning permission has been granted. This SPD has been subject to Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) screening which found no likely significant effects on designated habitats or any other significant environmental effects. The screening document produced by the Council can be found alongside this SPD. In line with regulation 9 of the Environmental Assessment of Plans & Programmes Regulations, the Environment Agency, Natural England and Historic England have been consulted on the findings of the screening document. This SPD was adopted on the 14th April 2021 with implementation on the 15th April 2021 and replaces the existing Thames Basin Heaths SPA Supplementary Planning Guidance dated February 2009. 3 This page is intentionally blank 4 Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 7 Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Supplementary Planning Document
    Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Supplementary Planning Document Bracknell Forest Council www.bracknell-forest.gov.uk/spa April 2018 1 Summary 1 1 Introduction 4 1.1 The Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area 4 1.2 Purpose and Scope of the SPD 4 1.3 Spatial Policy Framework 4 1.4 Sustainability Appraisal 7 1.5 Sub-Regional Working 7 1.6 Consultation 8 2 Background 9 2.1 Habitats Regulations 9 2.2 Potential Adverse Effects on the Integrity of the SPA 10 3 SPA Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy 12 3.1 Introduction 12 3.2 Zones of Influence 12 3.3 Types of Development Covered 15 3.4 Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspaces (SANGs) 16 3.5 Strategic SANGs 18 3.6 Bespoke SANGs 19 3.7 Third Party Private SANGs 20 3.8 Agreed and Emerging SANGs 20 3.9 Strategic Access Management and Monitoring (SAMM) 26 3.10 Air Quality 27 4 Implementation and Monitoring 28 4.1 Introduction 28 4.2 Strategic SANG Contributions 28 4.3 Bespoke SANGs 31 4.4 Private Third Party SANGS 31 4.5 SAMM Contributions 32 4.6 Timing of Mitigation 32 4.7 Monitoring 33 www.bracknell-forest.gov.uk/spa 4.8 Review 33 Appendix 1: Thames Basin Heaths SPA 34 Appendix 2: Consideration of Development Proposals Affecting Internationally Designated Sites 35 Appendix 3: Strategic SANGs 36 Appendix 4: Bespoke SANGs 43 Appendix 5: Private Third Party SANGs 46 Appendix 6 SANG Maps and Catchment Areas 49 Appendix 7: SPA Avoidance and Mitigation Contributions 76 8 Glossary and Abbreviations 83 Figure 1 Thames Basin Heaths SPA and SPA Buffer Zones 14 Figure 2 SANGs in Bracknell Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Version 3 | July 2018 Contents
    Volunteer handbook Version 3 | July 2018 Contents 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 7. Important information 9. The social aspect 10. Map of managed sites 11. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2018 Registered Charity No 208123 Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be... SAVING THREATENED HABITATS… SURVEYING PROTECTED SPECIES INSPIRING A THE NEXT GENERAtion… RAISING AWARENESS IN YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation. We hope that you enjoy volunteering with us and feel part of our team. Founded by volunteers in 1959 the same ideals still remain at the core of the organisation today, with volunteers working alongside our staff in just about every aspect of the Trust. The partnership between the Trust and its volunteers has enabled us to advance nature conservation and awareness in the county and we are committed to continuing this vital work. This handbook has been produced by the Volunteer Development team and includes the main information you’ll need to know about volunteering with Surrey Wildlife Trust. Welcome and thank you for your support! Surrey Wildlife Trust Volunteer Handbook | 3 About Surrey Wildlife Trust Surrey Wildlife Trust is committed to helping wildlife to survive and thrive across the county Surrey Wildlife Trust is one of 46 Wildlife Trusts working across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Hart Vegetation Retention and Removal Plans
    NOTES PROJECT COMMITMENTS 53 52 1. Intended pipeline alignment is indicative only. Commitment to only utilise a 10m width when crossing 51 50 2. Root Protection Areas are only illustrated within the Order Limits, O1 through boundaries between fields where these include 58 49 48 hedgerows, trees or watercourses. 45 47 except within inset plans. 44 46 43 57 3. Additional scrub and ground cover may also need to be cleared 42 41 40 beneath the canopy of trees in woodland areas, to allow access 39 LOCATION SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS for the pipeline installation. 38 36 37 35 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce the impacts on 34 56 NW4 woodland and landscape within two areas with a combined 33 Montgomery`s 32 NW5 approximate distance of 100m. (Grid ref: SU7849946112 to 31 Farm 30 SU7853046153 and SU7854846176 to SU7857846217) 29 28 Pit 27 Working width reduced to 15m to reduce(disused) the impacts on Lee 26 Priority Habitat woodland with bat roost potential over an 25 NW6 Wood 24 approximate distance of 83m. (Grid ref: SU7877146476 to 23 22 SU7883346529) 21 59 20 19 18 D47 Locate haul road to use existing hedge gap. 17 16 55 15 14 13 12 11 10 54 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Montgomery Lane LOCATION PLAN SCALE 1:500,000 Swanthorpe House LEGEND ORDER LIMITS INTENDED PIPELINE ALIGNMENT O1 LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY BOUNDARY SHEET 27 HEDGEROW SHEET 28 O1 HCX 192 EXISTING CONTEXT HEDGEROW ANCIENT WOODLAND O1 HCX 191 ROOT PROTECTION AREAS WITHIN ORDER LIMITS - Dippenhall Road SEE NOTE 2 HEDGEROW HCX 190 No construction in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • R E S U L T S F R O M 2 0 1 3 D R I V I N G T R a N S E C T S a C R O S S T H E T H a M E S B a S I N H E a T H S S P
    Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA 1 Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA 2 Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Date: September 2013 Version: Final Recommended Citation: Fearnley, H. (2013). Results from the June 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Footprint Ecology. 3 Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Summary Car parking provision across the SPA Across the SPA 160 car parking areas were identified with a space for an estimated 2,118 parked vehicles. Three parking areas had been closed since the last count and two previously unmapped parking areas were identified. Car park transects Three weekday and three weekend driving transects were conducted counting all parked vehicles in the 161 car parking areas over a 2 hour time window. In total 3,164 parked vehicles were recorded with an average of 527 per count. Significantly more vehicles were recorded on the weekend (1,881) compared to the weekday (1,283) counts. There was a significant relationship between the capacity of a car park and the number of parked vehicles. In total 8 commercial dog walking vans were observed parked adjacent to SPA access points and 79 parked vehicles had bike racks. Estimation of visitors from car park transect data The car park transect data were scaled up using the mean vehicle occupancy value calculated from the face to face visitor work in 2012 (Fearnley & Liley 2012). We estimate the car park transect data captures visitor information from 5,219 people and their 3,179 dogs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowland Mosaic
    15. LANDSCAPE TYPE 8: LOWLAND MOSAIC Location and Boundaries 15.1. The landscape type comprises a lowland area in the eastern part of the AONB intervening between the two main chalk upland blocks to the north and south and lying to either side of the Kennet Valley (7A). The boundaries are essentially defined by geology with the change from the chalk to the Tertiary deposits of the Reading Beds, the Bagshot Beds and London Clay. In the north the chalk descends as a gradual dipslope (2A: Brightwalton Downs & 2B: Ashampstead Downs), while to the south it rises as a dramatic escarpment (2D: Walbury Hill - Watership Downs Scarp). The geological transition within this landscape type is clearly marked by the lower topography and the land cover of woodland and pasture. Overview The lowland mosaic is a distinct landscape in the eastern part of the North Wessex Downs occupying the low lying basin of gravel beds and clays which rise either side of the Kennet Valley. The area has a strong woodland character, with its origins as part of the medieval forests. In the early 17th century the forests were subject to gradual piecemeal enclosure, the legacy of which is reflected in numerous dispersed small settlements and farms. Today the area is characterised by irregular fields, cut out from the woodland during the medieval or post medieval period, interspersed with parcels of woodland and commons. Although in some areas, a more open landscape dominated by large-scale arable farmland is found. One of the most densely inhabited parts of the North Wessex Downs, this lowland area has a diverse range of settlements ranging from large manor houses associated with the many parklands to the network of hamlets, lines of houses and villages that occur along the lanes and roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Ornithological Club Conservation Subcommittee 7.30Pm Tuesday 2Nd February 2021 on Zoom
    Berkshire Ornithological Club Conservation Subcommittee 7.30pm Tuesday 2nd February 2021 on Zoom 1. Present: Neil Bucknell, Patrick Crowley, Chris Foster, Renton Righelato, Des Sussex, Marek Walford. Apologies: Fraser Cottington, Roger Frankum, Ken Moore. 2. Minutes of meeting of 20th October 2020: approved. 3. Matter arising not covered elsewhere: a. Lower Farm potential sale: no further news has been received. b. Grebe survey report: incomplete action: Chris Foster, Renton Righelato c. Conservation fund: £2k held for conservation at Fobney island has been transferred from the BOC General Reserve to the Conservation Fund (now £36k). 4. Summary of main actions since the last meeting: in response to a request from Sean Murphy (BTO rep for Berkshire), the BTO advice on its surveys has been put on the BOC website. Its interpretation of government guidance states “…this entails limiting your survey activities to within the boundary of the property in which you reside.” No BOC surveys are being carried out this winter. A meeting will be held in early March (provisionally set for 9th) to plan breeding season surveys in the light of government guidance expected by then (Renton to organise). 5. Planning: response to West Berkshire Council consultation on NE Thatcham development proposal As background, Neil explained that the UK government now requires developers in England to create a net gain in biodiversity of at least 10%. [see https://www.biodiversityinplanning.org/news/bd-net-gain/]. He suggested that Biodiversity Action Plans of the Berkshire Local Nature Partnership and local authorities be reviewed to take account of this opportunity. Des noted that the current Environment Bill has a requirement for Nature Recovery Networks to be established by Natural England.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer - Handbook
    Volunteer - handbook - Version 2 | May 2017 Contents Volunteer Handbook 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 5. What do volunteers do? 5. Who can volunteer? 5. Why volunteer with us? 5. Do volunteers have to be members? 5. Do you need prior experience? 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 6. Our responsibilities to you 7. Important information 7.Registration and induction 7. Being a Trust representative 7. Expenses and timesheets 7. Supervision and support 8. Training and development 8. Voluntary Conservation Trainees 8. Policies and procedures 10. The social aspect 11. Managed sites 12. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2016 Registered Charity No 208123, Surrey Wildlife Trust Ltd. is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no. 645176, VAT No 791.3799.78 Scrub control, Water Vole, Grass Snake, Jon Hawkins; Dormouse, Tom Marshall; Muddy hands, Julie Norman; Heather, Tom Marshall; Grassland survey, woodland survey, family pond dipping, Matthew Roberts; Bee Orchid, P. Precey; River survey, Karen Lloyd; Box checking, Lizzie Wilberforce; Otter, Elliott Neep Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of over 1000 volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be saving threatened habitats… ….Or surveying protected species You could be inspiring a child to try pond dipping… ….Or raising awareness in your local community Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation.
    [Show full text]