DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Creek Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big Creek Environmental Assessment BIG CREEK NATIONAL DISASTER RESILIENCE DESIGN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Prepared for: Shelby County, Tennessee Mayor Lee Harris Prepared By: Barge Design Solutions, Inc. October 2019 For further information, contact: Jim Vazquez Administrator Shelby County Office of Resilience 125 North Main Street Room 443 Memphis, Tennessee 38103 Phone: 901-636-7170 E-mail: [email protected] Big Creek National Disaster Resilience Design Project Tables of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................................... 3 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 3 1.4 DESIRED FUTURE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 3 1.5 SCOPE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 4 1.6 REQUIRED PERMITS AND LICENSES ...................................................................................... 4 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................ 6 2.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 PROPOSED ACTION ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................... 6 2.3 ALTERNATIVES ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION ................................ 11 2.4 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC MODELING ....................................................................... 13 2.5 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................................... 17 2.6 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................................... 19 2.7 THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ............................................................................................ 19 2.8 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .............................................................................................................. 19 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .................... 22 3.1 PLANNING, LAND USE, AND ZONING .................................................................................... 22 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 22 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 23 3.2 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND PRIME FARMLAND......................................................................... 23 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 23 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 28 3.3 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 29 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 29 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 33 3.4 FLOODPLAINS .............................................................................................................................. 36 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 36 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 36 3.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 39 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 39 i Big Creek National Disaster Resilience Design Project Tables of Contents Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 40 3.6 VISUAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 41 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 41 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 41 3.7 NOISE ............................................................................................................................................. 41 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 42 Environment Consequences .......................................................................................................... 42 3.8 AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ......................................................... 42 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 43 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 44 3.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................... 45 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 45 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 46 3.10 SOLID WASTE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................. 47 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 47 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 48 3.11 SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ................................................... 49 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 49 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 51 3.12 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES .................................................................................................. 51 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 51 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 52 3.13 AIRPORT HAZARDS .................................................................................................................. 52 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 52 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 53 3.14 PUBLIC SAFETY ......................................................................................................................... 53 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 53 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 53 3.15 UTILITIES ..................................................................................................................................... 55 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 55 Environmental Consequences ....................................................................................................... 55 3.16 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... 56 4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................................................... 58 ii Big Creek National Disaster Resilience Design Project Tables of Contents 5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 59 List of Tables Table 1. Summary and Comparison of Alternatives by Resource Area .................................. 18 Table 2. Site Soils – Main
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bradley Parker 2018 Green Camp Paper
    Bradley parker MEMPHIS STORM WATER GREEN CAMP 2018 “Water Quality Affect Upon Wildlife Populations found within Natural and Man-made Wetlands Located in the Memphis and Surrounding Areas” A ct the Wildlife WETLAND Exploration Week of June 11 - 15 SUMMER - 2018 “Does pollution and Water Quality Affect the Wildlife Populations found within both Natural, Man-made, and Channelized Wetlands found within the Memphis and Surrounding Areas?” Types of Wetlands: Natural and Man-made A wetland is one of several types of biomes found in areas having high humidity, may or may not contain large amounts of animal and plant life that is diverse and expresses characteristics adapted to the dryness and wetness of the habitats. Wetlands occur in depressed land areas called basins that are natural a result of land topography or are designed by man, created to house organisms while working as a greenway for improved human health conditions and pollution controls. Trees grow where the ground is wet part of the year and as the ground dries, new life enters and co-exist within a cycle of seasonal rainfall conditions. All wetlands are imperative for the filtration processes working to decrease toxins and chemical pollution found on both land and in water. Wetlands serve as a pollution interception, toxic residue processing and removal of waste. Wetlands are also used for recreational, aesthetics, and educational purposes and provide homes called habitats for many diverse species of organisms. The flora and fauna thrive and adapt within a wetland environment that consist by seasonal conditions produced by weather conditions of dryness and wetness and are associated with storm and rainwater runoff, drainage, pond, river, and pool overflows, man- induced water channeling, flooding and some processes associated with drainage waste collection and disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Stormwater Monitoring Plan Unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee May 1, 2018
    2018 Stormwater Monitoring Plan Unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee May 1, 2018 The Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) encompassed by unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee (Tracking No. TNS075663) includes portions of four (4) distinct HUC_8 Watersheds, as shown on Figure 1. These watersheds include the following: 1. The Loosahatchie River Watershed (HUC_8 08010209) 2. the Wolf River Watershed (HUC_8 08010210) 3. the Nonconnah Creek Watershed (HUC_8 08010211), and 4. the Mississippi River Watershed (HUC_8 08010100) Figure 1 HUC_8 Watersheds Shelby County, Tennessee The land uses present in each of these watersheds are extremely diverse, including agricultural/pastures, woodlands, both low and high density residential, and commercial/industrial. In addition to the various land uses encountered within the Shelby County MS4, a large percentage of the runoff in the watersheds can be attributed to MS4’s belonging to other government entities. The Loosahatchie River Watershed receives runoff from Fayette County and Tipton County in Tennessee, Naval Support Activities Mid South, and from the municipalities of Memphis, Arlington, Lakeland, Bartlett and Millington, TN. The Wolf River Watershed receives runoff from Fayette County, TN, northern Mississippi, and from the municipalities of Memphis, Bartlett, Lakeland, Germantown, and Collierville, TN. The Nonconnah Creek Watershed receives runoff from Fayette County, TN, from Marshall and Desoto 2018 Stormwater Monitoring Plan Unincorporated Shelby County, Tennessee Counties in Mississippi, from the municipalities of Germantown, and Collierville, TN. The Mississippi River Watershed receives runoff from the eastern floodplain of the Mississippi River from the southwest corner of Shelby County, TN to the confluence of the Ohio River at Cairo, IL.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelby County, Tennessee and Incorporated Areas
    SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 3 SHELBY COUNTY Community Name Community Number ARLINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF 470262 BARTLETT, CITY OF 470175 COLLIERVILLE, TOWN OF 470263 GERMANTOWN, CITY OF 470353 LAKELAND, CITY OF 470402 MEMPHIS, CITY OF 470177 MILLINGTON, CITY OF 470178 SHELBY COUNTY 470214 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) REVISED: February 6, 2013 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 47157CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS report may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS report may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. A listing of the Community Map Repositories can be found on the Index Map. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: December 2, 1994 First Revised Countywide FIS Revision Date: September 28, 2007 Second Revised Countywide FIS Revision Date: February 6, 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ± Volume 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Great River Road Tennessee
    Great River Road Tennessee Corridor Management Plan Corridor Management Plan Recognitions Mayor AC Wharton Shelby County Byway Consultant Mayor Jeff Huffman Tipton County David L. Dahlquist Mayor Rod Schuh Lauderdale County Governor Phil Bredesen President Mayor Richard Hill Dyer County State of Tennessee David L. Dahlquist Associates, L.L.C. Mayor Macie Roberson Lake County State Capitol 5204 Shriver Avenue Mayor Benny McGuire Obion County Nashville, TN 37243 Des Moines, IA 50312 Commissioner Susan Whitaker Pickering Firm, Inc Department of Tourist Development Byway Planning Team Architecture – Engineering – Planning – Surveying Wm. Snodgrass/Tennessee Tower 312 8th Avenue North, 25th Floor Bob Pitts, PE Nashville, TN 37243 Mississippi River Corridor – Tennessee, Inc. Principal Owner Board of Directors Director, Civil Engineering Services Ms. Marty Marbry 6775 Lenox Center Court – Suite 300 West Tennessee – Tourist Development Memphis, TN 38115 Regional Marketing & Public Relations John Sheahan Chairman/CEO John Threadgill Secretary Historical Consultant Commissioner Gerald Nicely Dr. Carroll Van West Tennessee Department of Transportation Jim Bondurant Chair – Obion - Task Force Committe Director 505 Deaderick St. Rosemary Bridges Chair – Tipton - Task Force Committee Center for Historic Preservation James K. Polk Bldg. – 7th Floor Peter Brown Chair – Dyer - Task Force Committee Middle Tennessee State University Nashville, TN 37243 Laura Holder Tennessee Civil War National Heritage Area P.O. Box 80 – MTSU Pamela Marshall Public Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Shelby County, TN
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE SITES NEAR ARLINGTON, STATE ROUTE 385 (PAUL BARRETT PARKWAY), SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Archaeological Testing at 40SY525 and 40SY526 and Archaeological Testing and Data Recovery at 40SY527 compiled by Guy G. Weaver authored by Guy G. Weaver C. Andrew Buchner Mitchell R. Childress Mary E. Starr with contributions by Andrea Shea ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLICATIONS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 4 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1999 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE SITES NEAR ARLINGTON, STATE ROUTE 385 (PAUL BARRETT PARKWAY), SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Archaeological Testing at 40SY525 and 40SY526 and Archaeological Testing and Data Recovery at 40SY527 PREPARED FOR The Tennessee Department of Transportation J.K. Polk Building, Suite 900 Nashville, TN 37243 615/741-5257 IN COORDINATION WITH The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration UNDER TDOT Project Number 93-42-04-1230 Tennessee State Archaeological Permit Number 000132R BY GARROW & ASSOCIATES, INC. Memphis, TN 38103 SUBMITTED APRIL 1996 PUBLISHED MARCH 1999 Edited by: Guy G. Weaver Contributions by: Guy G. Weaver C. Andrew Buchner Mitchell R. Childress Mary E. Starr Andrea Shea TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE PUBLICATIONS IN ARCHAEOLOGY NO. 4 STATE OF TENNESSEE POLICY OF NON-DISCRIMINATION Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Transportation does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability in employment nor in access to or participation in any of its activities, programs, or services. Civil rights inquires or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Transportation, Affirmative Action Director, Civil Rights Division, Suite 400, James K.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxins! Tocsin: the North Hollywood Dump in Memphis, Tennessee: a Community's Struggle Against Environmental Racism
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-1996 Toxins! Tocsin: The North Hollywood Dump in Memphis, Tennessee: A Community's Struggle Against Environmental Racism Glenn Steve Johnson University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Glenn Steve, "Toxins! Tocsin: The North Hollywood Dump in Memphis, Tennessee: A Community's Struggle Against Environmental Racism. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1996. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2528 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Glenn Steve Johnson entitled "Toxins! Tocsin: The North Hollywood Dump in Memphis, Tennessee: A Community's Struggle Against Environmental Racism." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Sociology. John Gaventa, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Sherry Cable, Donald Hastings,
    [Show full text]
  • Flood-Frequency Prediction Methods for Unregulated Streams of Tennessee, 2000
    Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Department of Transportation Flood-Frequency Prediction Methods for Unregulated Streams of Tennessee, 2000 Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4176 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Flood-Frequency Prediction Methods for Unregulated Streams of Tennessee, 2000 By George S. Law and Gary D. Tasker U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4176 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Department of Transportation Nashville, Tennessee 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100 Federal Center Nashville, Tennessee 37211 Box 25286 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Somerville Beltway Archaeology Report
    STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION SUITE 900 - JAMES K. POLK BUILDING 505 DEADERICK STREET NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0334 October 4, 2007 Mr. E. Partick McIntyre, Jr. Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Tennessee Historical Commission 2941 Lebanon Road Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0442 Re: The Proposed State Route 460, Somerville Bypass, From State Route 15 West of Somerville to State Route 15 East of Somerville, Fayette County PIN 101607.00; PE# 24092-1203-14 Dear Mr. McIntyre, Enclosed is a draft phase 1 archaeological assessment report of the proposed TDOT State Route 460 Somerville Bypass project in Fayette County. Personnel with Weaver & Associates LLC performed all aspects of the assessment. We have read the report and concur with the conclusion that there are no archaeological historic properties in the project’s area of potential effect (APE). Consequently, it is our opinion that no further archaeological investigations are warranted on the project. Pursuant to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (as amended) and implementing regulations 36 CFR 800, please review the enclosed report and provide me with your comments. If there are any questions, please contact me at 741-5257. I appreciate your assistance. Sincerely, Gerald W. Kline Transportation Specialist I Archaeology Program Manager GWK cc: Ms. Jennifer Barnett, TDOA, w/enclosure Archaeology File: 96080 Final Report A Phase I Archaeological Assessment: State Route 15 (Somerville Beltway) Fayette County, Tennessee TDOT Project No. 24092-1203-14 PIN 101607.00 TDOA Permit No. 000600 Work Order 004 Agreement No. E1062 Submitted to: Tennessee Department of Transportation Environmental Division Suite 900, James K.
    [Show full text]
  • Memphis Public Ledger [Newspaper] Index, 1866
    University of Memphis University of Memphis Digital Commons Early Memphis Newspaper Indices Special Collections 4-6-2021 Memphis Public Ledger [newspaper] index, 1866 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/speccoll-news Recommended Citation "Memphis Public Ledger [newspaper] index, 1866" (2021). Early Memphis Newspaper Indices. 11. https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/speccoll-news/11 This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at University of Memphis Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Early Memphis Newspaper Indices by an authorized administrator of University of Memphis Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Memphis Public Ledger 1866 Compiled by Joyce McKibben University of Memphis Libraries 2015 The Memphis Public Ledger was launched in 1865 and ceased in 1893. It was a Democratic paper with strong pro-Confederate sympathies. The University of Memphis Libraries does not own copies of this newspaper but issues are available at Chronicling America https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/ for the years 1866-1883. A 5th United States Cavalry Regiment July 13, 1866, 3:4 25th United States Infantry Regiment October 20, 1866, 3:5 44th U.S. Colored Infantry Regiment April 30, 1866, 2:2 57th U.S. Colored Infantry Regiment June 6, 1866, 2:3 “A Baptist Friend” June 16, 1866, 3:2 A. Caldwell (Steamboat) June 28, 1866, 3:6 “A Citizen” July 21, 1866, 3:2 (letter) Abandoned buildings - Memphis, Tenn. September 6, 1866, 3:5
    [Show full text]
  • Loosahatchie River Greenway Trail Master Plan July 7, 2014
    Loosahatchie River Greenway Trail Master Plan July 7, 2014 1 Loosahatchie River Greenway Trail Master Plan Table of Contents List of Illustrations 2 4.0.0 Master Plan 24 4.1.0 Trail heads 24 4.2.0 Trail Linkages 24 1.0.0 Introduction 3 4.3.0 Support Improvements 25 1.1.0 Purpose of the Plan 3 1.2.0 Greenprint Context 3 5.0.0 Phasing Plan 27 5.1.0 Phase I: Environmental Awareness Trail Heads 27 2.0.0 Plan Context 5 5.2.0 Phase II: The River Connection 27 2.1.1 Regional context 5 5.3.0 Phase III: The Loosahatchie River Trail Head and Nature Park 27 2.1.2 Loosahatchie River and Loosahatchie River Channel 5 5.4.0 Phase IV: Airline Road Trail Head and Connectors 27 2.1.3 Town of Arlington 6 2.2.0 History of Trail Development 8 2.2.1 Early trails 8 6.0.0 Greenway Design Standards 29 2.2.2 Benefits of trails 8 6.1.0 Trails 29 6.1.1 Pedestrian facilities 29 6.1.2 Bike lane (on-road) facilities 32 3.0.0 The Design Process 9 6.1.3. Shared use paths 33 3.1.0 Overview 9 6.2.0 Support facilities (trail heads) 37 3.2.0 Goals and Objectives 9 6.3.0 Signs, pavement markings and traffic signals 37 3.2.1 Goal 1 – Interconnect with surrounding region. 9 6.4.0 Site furnishings and landscaping 37 3.2.2 Goal 2 – Provide recreational amenity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Slough One of a Kind Recreational Property Located Just Minutes from Downtown Memphis
    FOR SALE Ash Slough One of a kind recreational property located just minutes from downtown Memphis. 268 +/- Acres Shelby County, Tennessee G A Robinson Land Co. LLC is the Exclusive Agent for the property described herein. This brochure and all information contained herein is believed to be correct; however, we make no guarantee as to its accuracy. Prospective buyers are urGed to inspect the property and perform their own independent due diligence. G A Robinson Land Co LLC. and its agents assume no liability as to errors, omissions or investment results. FOR APPOINTMENT PLEASE CONTACT: BERT ROBINSON IV Bert Robinson IV [email protected] 901.526.7631 www.garobinson.com 91 South Front Street • Suite 02 • Memphis, Tennessee 38103 PROPERTY DETAILS Ash Slough Shelby County, Tennessee Description Ash Slough Proper Owned by the Cardosi family for over 40 years, The namesake slough is a 7+/- acre river chute that Ash Slough offers the outdoorsman a myriad of holds water year round. Famous for its outstanding duck opportunities just minutes from the Memphis City limits. hunting, it also offers fishing opportunities. 268 +/- acres of a mixture of bottomland hardwoods, food plots, cypress sloughs, with opportunities for Hunting ducks, turkeys, doves and deer. Waterfowl—Ash Slough offers superb waterfowl hunting in the slough itself and also in the timber when flooded. Location With some minor improvements, several impoundments Located north of Memphis, TN at the confluence of could be created for additional waterfowl opportunities. the Loosahatchie River and the Mississippi River, Ash Slough is easily accessed from Memphis in mere Turkeys and Deer—The entire Shelby Forest ecosystem minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking in the Trail ® Carved by the Mighty Mississippi and Once the Western Boundary of America
    memphis area self-guided driving tour Welcome to the Great River Road National Scenic Byway & Trail. SEE THE DRIVING TOUR MAP ON PAGE 12. Make your way along the western border of Tennessee taKing in the trail ® carved by THE mightY mississippi and once the western boundary of America. The Great River Road National Scenic • These 240 miles are full of historic sites, preserved homes and museums that bring the stories of the Great River Byway & Trail starts in Memphis, the southwestern most Road to life. Many of them require advance reservations, point in the state, and travels to the northwestern border admission or both to experience our history. at legEndarY Reelfoot Lake. The route from corner to • Many historic buildings, like Alex Haley’s boyhood home, corner is a part of the larger Great River Road National Scenic open their doors to visitors. Many properties remain Byway, a designated route spanning 10 states, from the as they have for over a century: private residences. Please be respectful of the private land and homeowners Mississippi River’s headwaters in Minnesota all the way to on our tour. the Gulf of Mexico. RIP? We’ve got • This is a drive that promises an off-the-beaten-path READY FOR A TENNESSEE ROAD T On the Tennessee portion, you’ll encounter small towns Tennessee experience. What we can’t promise is steady you covered on the new, self-guided driving trails of the full of history, local fare bursting with flavor, and Discover Tennessee Trails & Byways. On the Cotton Junction cell phone service.
    [Show full text]