I-269 Tennessee Regional Vision Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I-269 Tennessee Regional Vision Study I-269 TENNESSEE A Regional Vision Study Completed January 2013 This document is available in accessible formats when requested five days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization and is prepared in cooperation with or with financial assistance from all or several of the following public enti- ties: the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, the Tennessee and Mississippi Department of Transportation, the Memphis Area Transit Authority, and the local governments in the MPO region. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the funding agencies. It is the policy of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) not to dis- criminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, national origin or disability in its hiring or employ- ment practices, or in its admission to or operations of its program, services, or activities. All inqui- ries for Title VI and/or the American Disabilities Act, contact John Paul Shaffer at (901) 576-7190 or [email protected]. Table of Contents CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................1 RESUMEN EJECTUTIVO ..........................................................................................9 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................19 CHAPTER 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................27 DESCRIPTION OF THE CORRIDOR ................................................................................ 28 STUDY AREA EXISTING PLANS AND ZONING ............................................................. 52 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 68 CHAPTER 3: FORMING A REGIONAL VISION ........................................................71 IMAGINE 2040 / DIRECTION 2040 ................................................................................ 72 DIRECTION 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN .......................................... 72 IMAGINE 2040 – LAND USE AND SCENARIO PLANNING ............................................ 78 I-269 TN STEERING COMMITTEE .................................................................................. 81 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................................................................. 82 PUBLIC OUTREACH ...................................................................................................... 86 MEDIA OUTREACH ....................................................................................................... 87 DATA DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................... 88 INTERACTIVE DEVICES................................................................................................. 89 PUBLIC QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................. 89 CHAPTER 4: I-269 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ....................................................93 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................ 94 ECONOMIC VITALITY ............................................................................................................95 Table of Contents QUALITY OF LIFE ..................................................................................................................97 LAND USE PATTERNS ...........................................................................................................99 JURISDICTIONAL COLLABORATION ..................................................................................101 VISUAL PREFERENCE SURVEY ................................................................................... 101 I-269 TENNESSEE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ......................................................... 102 BASE GROWTH SCENARIO .................................................................................................103 CITIZEN SCENARIO .............................................................................................................103 HIGH GROWTH SCENARIO .................................................................................................105 FOCUSED GROWTH SCENARIO ..........................................................................................106 LAND USE SUITABILITY AND ALLOCATION RESULTS .......................................................107 EVALUATING THE SCENARIOS ................................................................................... 110 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS .........................................................................................110 PLANNING THEME – LAND USE PATTERN MOE .................................................................111 PLANNING THEME – QUALITY OF LIFE MOE .....................................................................114 PLANNING THEME – ECONOMIC VITALITY ........................................................................115 I-269 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL RESULTS ..........................................................................115 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................129 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 130 TOOLBOX FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 133 APPENDIX A: I-269 STEERING COMMITTEE ........................................................139 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC QUESTIONNAIRE ..............................................................151 APPENDIX C: SCENARIO PLANNING AND PLACE TYPES ....................................177 APPENDIX D: DRAFT REVIEW COMMENTS .........................................................185 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2 Executive Summary CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION In an effort to help shape future development along the I-269 Corridor in Tennessee, the Transportation Policy Board (TPB) of the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) recommended a study to look at how the jurisdictions along the Tennessee portion of I-269, would like to see the corridor developed. This was accomplished using a visioning and scenario planning process that encouraged citizens and communi- ties to explore and debate regional growth visions, trade-offs, and alternative future scenarios related to the I-269 Corridor in Tennessee. CHAPTER 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS The Memphis region has become one of the nation’s top multimodal transportation hubs, due to its inter- connected water, roadway, air, and rail infrastructure. Transportation facilities in the Memphis region must balance serving freight transportation as well as the area’s 1.2 million residents. Additionally, this must be done in a way that designed to reduce negative impacts to the region’s environment, existing communities, businesses, and residents. Interstate 269 was designed as a component of I-69, which will eventually connect Mexico to Canada across the United States, serving both domestic and international trade along the corridor. The I-269 loop was included to respond to local traffic growth and demands of the Memphis region and to provide access between communities in the region. The combination of I-69 through the center of Memphis and the I-269 loop around the city was designed to both alleviate congestion within the city while improving connectivity throughout the region and to provide an interconnected facility that will help attract new jobs to the region. I-269 is an approximately 64 mile long interstate facility through Desoto and Marshall Counties in Missis- sippi and Shelby and Fayette Counties in Tennessee. I-269, which is centered on the city of Memphis, begins in Hernando, Mississippi to the south and connects to Millington in northwest Shelby County, Tennessee. This study will examine only the portion of I-269 that lies within Tennessee, approximately 36.2 miles, and look in more detail at the 15 existing and planned interchanges along I-269 within Tennessee. In Chapter 2 Existing Conditions, an analysis was performed to examine employment, commuting pat- terns, traffic volumes, level of service, and crash data for a study area comprised of a one mile offset in each direction from the I-269 alignment. EMPLOYMENT AND COMMUTING PATTERNS As of 2010, the I-269 TN study area was home to approximately 10,500 workers, the majority of whom (95%) worked outside the study area. For those resident workers commuting outside of the study area to work, roughly 65% commute to the city of Memphis for their primary jobs. A similar commuting pattern is evident for the nearly 8,000 workers employed inside the I-269 Tennessee study area, with 94% of those workers commuting into the study area from residences outside. In contrast to the sectors of employment for residents of the study area, the jobs inside the study area lean somewhat more heavily toward manufac- turing and retail. The top sectors for employment within the I-269 study area in 2010 were: Manufacturing (26.6%); Retail Trade (18.5%); Health Care and Social Assistance (11.3%); Wholesale Trade (8.5%); Administra- tion & Support, Waste Management and Remediation (6.3%); and Construction
Recommended publications
  • 2010 Annual Report • Preserve
    Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park 2010 Annual Report • Preserve. Protect. Provide. Photos by Genia Stadler About This Publication Our 2010 Annual Report exists exclusively in digital format, available on our website at www.FriendsOfTheSmokies.org. In order to further the impact of our donors’ resources for the park’s benefit we chose to publish this report online. If you would like a paper copy, you may print it from home on your computer, or you may request a copy to be mailed to you from our office (800-845-5665). We are committed to conserving natural resources in and around Great Smoky Mountains National Park! The images used on the front and back covers are If your soul can belong to provided through the generosity, time, and talent of a place, mine belongs here. Genia Stadler of Sevierville, Tennessee. Genia Stadler When asked to describe herself and her love for the Smokies, she said, “I was born in Alabama, but Tennessee always felt like home to me. My love for the Smokies started as a small child. My daddy brought me here each summer before he passed away. I was 9 when he died, and by then I had fallen in love with the Smokies. My husband (Gary) and I had the chance to build a cabin and move here in 2002, so we jumped at the chance. Since then, we’ve been exploring the park as often as we can. We’ve probably hiked over 300 miles of the park’s trails (many repeats), and I’m trying to pass my love for this place on to my two children and two grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • With Its Enviable Infrastructure Featuring Runway, Road, Rail, and River Access, Memphis Is a Model of Logistics Diversity
    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION OF THE JOURNAL OF COMMERCE SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION OF THE JOURNAL OF COMMERCE With its enviable infrastructure featuring runway, road, rail, and river access, Memphis is a model of logistics diversity. Shutterstock.com 52 The Journal of Commerce | October 15 2018 www.joc.com www.joc.com SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION OF THE JOURNAL OF COMMERCE SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION OF THE JOURNAL OF COMMERCE MEMPHIS TRADE Trade Nexus Inland potential expands in Memphis By John Powers THE EFFICACY OF inland ports is supported to-common coastal congestion. “Even though America and second-busiest in the world. In by the number being opened by deep-water many ocean carriers are reluctant to have 2017, the airport handled 4.33 million metric ports. Driven by the need to optimize terminal their containers moved to inland points, in tons of cargo. Much of this activity is attributable efficiency, seaports are eager to mitigate the many instances, shippers are able to negotiate to its location as a global hub for FedEx, the threat of on-port congestion by transferring preferential all-in rates to inland destinations,” world’s busiest freight-parcel carrier, as ranked boxes as quickly as possible to strategically McDuffie added. by AirCargo News in July (according to IATA situated inland hubs, in some instances even With its enviable infrastructure featuring 2018 World Air Transport Statistics). No. 3 outside the borders of their home states. “There access via airport runways, interstate roadways, cargo carrier UPS and seven other all-cargo are more and more pressures on port cities to rail networks, and the mighty Mississippi River, airlines also serve Memphis.
    [Show full text]
  • I-69 Implementation Strategy and Update Report
    I-69 Implementation Strategy Update Report February 2018 Transportation Planning and Programming Division Report Revision History The following table tracks revisions and changes made to this report over time. Date Revision Explanation March 2016 First edition of the report February 2018 • Updates Statewide and District Summaries based on fiscal year (FY) 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) and its December 2017 revision as well as TxDOT’s other internal planning and programming systems as of January 3, 2018 • Includes Advisory Committee $2B project prioritization exercise results I-69 Implementation Strategy Update Report – February 2018 ii Table of Contents Page Preface ....................................................................................................................................... iv List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... v Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 I-69 System ............................................................................................................................... 1 Importance of the I-69 System to Texas ........................................................................ 3 I-69 System Project Prioritization ............................................................................................. 6 I-69 System Implementation Strategy Update .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO
    Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Engineering and Technical Committee Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:30 PM UT Health Science Center – Student Alumni Building 800 Madison Avenue - Memphis, Tennessee Note: Please fill out a comment card and return it to an MPO staff member located at the Sign-In Table to be given the opportunity to speak on any of the agenda items. Comment cards must be returned before the agenda item is brought to the floor. You will be given up to two minutes to provide your comments. 1) Call to Order 2) Approval of November 1, 2018 Minutes ACTION 3) Memphis MPO’s Administrator’s Report a) 2018 State of the MPO Annual Report b) 2018 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Biennial Report c) FY 2020-21 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Major Planning Activities List d) MPO Unobligated Balance (TN) – Update e) FY 2020-23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – Update f) 2019 Transportation Management Area (TMA) Certification 4) Memphis Urban Area MPO and West Memphis MPO Cooperative Agreement ACTION Approval of a cooperative agreement between the Memphis MPO and the West Memphis MPO for coordination of transportation planning activities, as required by 23 CFR 450.314 5) Tri-State Umbrella Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) ACTION Approval of an MOU between the Memphis MPO, West Memphis MPO, TDOT, TDEC, MDOT, MDEQ, ARDOT, ADEQ, MATA, and the Shelby County Health Department for coordination of the transportation planning process within the Memphis, TN-MS-AR Urbanized Area, as required by 23 CFR
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Route 66 Auto Tour — Williams to Flagstaff, Arizona Williams Ranger District Kaibab National Forest
    Southwestern Region United States Department of Agriculture RG-3-07-07 Forest Service July 2013 Historic Route 66 Auto Tour — Williams to Flagstaff, Arizona Williams Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Points of Interest Take a trip back in time, to a day when driving across America meant finding adventure and freedom on the open road. Imagine what it was like when Arizona’s first tourists saw scenic wonders like the Navajo Indian Reservation, Petrified Forest, Grand Canyon National Park, and pine-laden Kaibab National Forest. Cruise down memory lane and discover the past on Historic Route 66. Williams served travelers on Route 66 as part of the “Main Street of America.” Now called Bill Williams Avenue in this picturesque western town, the historic road is still lined with businesses dating from the highway’s heyday. In 1984, Williams became the last Route 66 town in America to be bypassed by Interstate 40. The tour winds through beautiful scenery toward Bill Williams Mountain. Interstate 40 now covers this section of Route 66 at Davenport Lake. Pittman Valley was first settled by ranchers in the 1870s. Tourists found guest cabins and a gas station along the road here. Historic Route 66 Auto Tour ― Williams to Flagstaff, AZ 1 Garland Prairie Vista has a beautiful view of the San Francisco Peaks, the highest mountains in Arizona. A favorite with photographers, this view appeared on many Route 66 postcards. Parks is a small community that started out as a railroad stop in the 1880s and later became a wayside for highway tourists. When the highway was thriving, the area had a Forest Service campground, several motels, gas stations, curio shops, and a road that led north to the Grand Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Countdown to December 1, 2019 “On This Day in History” for Johnson City, Tennessee’S Sesquicentennial
    Countdown to December 1, 2019 “On this Day in History” for Johnson City, Tennessee’s Sesquicentennial December On December 1, 1869, Johnson City “received its first charter from the state of Tennessee under the name of Johnson City.” (Source: Greater Johnson City A Pictorial History.) On December 1, 1966, Johnson City native Steve Spurrier won the Heisman Trophy. (Source: “Glimpses of Johnson City, Tennessee,” Community Relations Department, City of Johnson City, Tennessee.) On December 2, 1978, the Statler Brothers appeared with Barbara Mandrel at Freedom Hall. Tickets ranged in price from $5.50 to $7.50. (Source: www.vincestaten.blogspot.com) Between December 3, 4, and 5, 1886, three feet of snow fell in Johnson City. “Activity ground to a halt for days.” (Source: I’d Rather Have a Talking Frog.) On December 3, 1978, Dorothy Hamill reported in her column that the old Science Hill High School would soon be torn down. (Source: Johnson City Press-Chronicle.) On December 4, 1984, an article in the Johnson City Press-Chronicle reported that recently, a day’s tobacco sales at Big Burley, Grower’s Co-Op, and Young’s Warehouse brought tobacco growers more than $1 million. So far that season, more than 2.1 million pounds of tobacco was sold, bringing more than $9 million into the local economy. (Source: Johnson City Press-Chronicle.) On December 5, 1907, children’s letters to Santa Claus, as printed in The Comet, an early Johnson City weekly newspaper, reveals their wishes for such Christmas goodies as fruit, oranges, nuts and other foods. Dolls and books were also popular items.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16B)
    OMB No. 10024-0018 NFS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service FEB | 7 I999 National Register of Historic Places m REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Registration Form NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ** This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic and Architectural Resources of Union City, (Obion County) Tennessee B. Associated Historic Contexts___________________________ (Name each Associated Historic Context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each>) I. Development of Economics and Transportation, 1854 to 1947 II. Development of Domestic Architecture, 1854 -1947 C. Form Prepared by name/title Judi M. Mclntyre, Kate Carouthers, Carroll Van West organization MTSU Center for Historic Preservation date October 1998 street & number PO Box 80, MTSU __ telephone 615-898-2947 city or town Murfreesboro state TN____ zip code 37132 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nail Salon Owner Is on a Quest to Help Ex-Felons
    Public Records & Notices Monitoring local real estate since 1968 View a complete day’s public records Subscribe Presented by and notices today for our at memphisdailynews.com. free report www.chandlerreports.com Tuesday, April 20, 2021 MemphisDailyNews.com Vol. 136 | No. 47 Rack–50¢/Delivery–39¢ Whitehaven school’s ‘store’ rewards positive behavior DAJA E. HENRY bags of chips and basketballs to fourth-grader Jeremiah Haynes the Trailblazer Incentive Store is is a big deal to Phi Beta Sigma,” Courtesy of The Daily Memphian hoverboards and bicycles. said. The initiative started off as packed with prizes. said Dwayne Scott, chair of the Behind a royal blue ribbon and Third grader Maleek McClin- a cart stocked with candy that The goodies are for students chapter’s foundation. “We’re com- a closed door emblazoned with the ton broke out in dance, showing teachers would push around to who model positive behavior and mitted to you as long as Tau Iota school’s logo, students at Robert R. what he would do once he earned incentivize positive behavior. respect, excel in the classroom, Sigma is around. ... We are defi- Church Thursday, April 15, got to enough points for a BeyBlade. Now, after a $10,000 donation have good attendance or any nitely happy to labor with you and see for the first time a new incen- “I’m a gamer so I might as well from the Tau Iota Sigma chapter other behavior that would build tive store with prizes ranging from get a PlayStation 4 and AirPods,” of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity Inc., up their ClassDojo points.
    [Show full text]
  • I-69 Implementation Strategy Report – March 2016 Ii
    I-69 Implementation Strategy Report March 2016 Transportation Planning and Programming Division Table of Contents Page Preface ....................................................................................................................................... iii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ iv I-69 System Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Importance of the I-69 System to Texas ........................................................................ 1 I-69 System Progress ....................................................................................................... 5 I-69 Implementation Strategy .................................................................................................. 6 Development .................................................................................................................... 7 Components ..................................................................................................................... 9 Next Steps - How the Implementation Strategy Will Be Used ..................................... 11 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 12 I-69 Implementation Strategy Summary Information and Data .......................................... 13 Tables Table 1. I-69 System Activities Since September
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Application Prop Designation of I-840.Pdf
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials An Application from the State Highway or Transportation Department of Tennessee for: Elimination of a U.S. (Interstate) Route AASHTO Use Only Establishment of a U.S. (Interstate) Route I-840 Action taken by SCOH: Extension of a U.S. (Interstate)Route Relocation of a U.S. (Interstate) Route Establishment of a U.S. Alternate Route Establishment of a Temporary U.S. Route **Recognition of a Business Route on U.S. (Interstate) Route **Recognition of a By-Pass Route on U.S. Route Between Interstate 40 exit 176 and Interstate 40 exit 235 The following states or states are involved: Tennessee • **“Recognition of…”A local vicinity map needed on page 3. On page 6 a short statement to the effect that there are no deficiencies on proposed routing, if true, will suffice. • If there are deficiencies, they should be indicated in accordance with page 5 instructions. • All applications requesting Interstate establishment or changes are subject to concurrence and approval by the FHWA DATE SUBMITTED: SUBMIT APPLICATION ELECTRONICALLY TO [email protected] • *Bike Routes: this form is not applicable for US Bicycle Route System The purpose of the United States (U.S.) Numbered Highway System is to facilitate travel on the main interstate highways, over the shortest routes and the best available roads. A route should form continuity of available facilities through two or more states that accommodate the most important and heaviest motor traffic flow in the area. The routes comprising the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways will be marked with its own distinctive route marker shield and will have a numbering system that is separate and apart from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 40 Median Regrade Project Initial Study
    Interstate 40 Median Regrade Project San Bernardino County, California District 08-SBd-40 (PM R100.0/R125.0) EA 08-0R141/PN 0815000200 Initial Study [with Proposed] Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation September 2020 This page intentionally left blank. General Information About This Document What’s in this document: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has prepared this Initial Study, which examines the potential environmental impacts of alternatives being considered for the proposed project in San Bernardino County, California. The project is to regrade the existing median cross slope which vary from 2:1 to 6:1 or steeper gradient to 10:1 or flatter on Interstate 40 (I-40) from Post Mile (PM) R100.0 to PM R125.0. The document describes the project, the existing environment that could be affected by the project, potential impacts from the project, and proposed measures. What you should do: • Please read this document. • Additional copies of this document are available for review during regular business hours at the Needles Branch Library, 1111 Bailey Avenue, Needles, CA 92363, and at Caltrans District 8, 464 West 4th Street, San Bernardino, 92401. • We welcome your comments. If you have any comments about the proposed project, please send your written comments to Caltrans by the deadline below. • Submit comments via U.S. mail to Caltrans at the following address: Gabrielle Duff, Senior Environmental Planner California Department of Transportation, District 8 464 West 4th Street San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400 • Submit comments via email to: [email protected] • Submit comments by the deadline: October 26, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Bguide08.Pdf
    MetropolitanMetropolitan Memphis Hotel & Lodging AssociationAssociation MMHLAMMHLA MMHLA MMHLAMMHLAMMHLA& 2009 Buyers' Guide & Membership Directory MMHLAMMHLAMMHLAMMHLAMMHLAMMHLA MMHLAMMHLAMetropolitan Memphis Hotel & Lodging Association Metropolitan Memphis Hotel & Lodging Association The source for information and education, and the advocacy voice for the hotel and lodging industry in the metropolitan Memphis area. One of the most active and involved hotel associations in Tennessee! Bob Mercer, President Metropolitan Memphis Hotel & Lodging Association ANNUAL EVENTS & BENEFITS · Golf Tournament – Supports THLA Political from the University of Memphis, Southwest Action Committee. Tennessee Community College and Wooddale · World Series of Housekeeping – A FUN High School, to enrich the future of our industry. event & great morale booster. · Ronald McDonald Share-A-Night – Over · Christmas Party - Always combined with a $12,000 raised for Ronald McDonald House with community service project. this annual, FedEx St. Jude Golf Tournament · Memphis Lodging Industry Summit – A fundraiser. premiere lodging industry event where the · The Memphis Food Bank – A Share-A- experts examine industry trends and directions. Night program where hotels pledge $1 per night · The Lodging Industry Update – A full for a 2-night period to the Memphis Food Bank. morning of information on industry trends locally Allied Members can also pledge funds and and nationally. canned goods. · Tennessee Hotel & Lodging Association Add to these worthy programs and events: Conference – Held yearly for all state · MMHLA’s growing strength on behalf of the association members. lodging and tourism industry in the political arena. · The Stars of the Industry Awards – · The representation on federal legislation we Recognizing our best. offer to members via the THLA and the AHLA.
    [Show full text]