DOCSLIB.ORG

What's Wrong With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What's Wrong With O N N D G R O O L U P N E W S E R No 28 SEPTEMBER 2016 L E T T Our Newsletter is sent out to our London members and other contacts. The group exists to campaign for sustainable transport solutions in London and to support the work of the Campaign nationally. If you have not already done so we would be pleased if you would also join our group and take part in our London What’s based activities. To contact the group write to Chris Barker, wrong Campaign for Better Transport, 46 Redston Road, London N8 7HJ. with HS2 - E-mail: chrisjbark- [email protected]: the CBT phone 020 8347 7684. Regular meetings of EUSTON the group are held in view STATION central London. The Newsletter is edited by Chris Barker. Contribu- New high speed rail lines can to Scotland and Wales are rope with regular commuters connection at Old Oak Com- tors are welcomed. be a means of providing extra unclear making it difficult to hit the hardest by annual mon must be given serious Opinions expressed capacity and freeing up space on see how HS2 will compete season ticket hikes. Passen- consideration urgently. are those of the au- thors and not neces- existing lines for increased with short-distance aviation. gers travelling on the existing Ongoing investment in There has been insufficient HS1 line pay a premium and if public transport is vital to the sarily those of the freight and local passenger Campaign for Better services. work on the options for using this formula is applied to HS2, success of our country so the the capacity on the existing many people could be ex- very substantial government Transport. Previous issues of However, there are currently lines released by HS2, and the cluded from using HS2 ser- and industry support already some major problems with the newsletter can potential benefits that this vices and it will become a committed to the rail network be found at the plans for the HS2 project capacity could bring by ena- railway for the rich. should be celebrated. New as they stand, not least for the http://bettertransport- bling lower carbon develop- But in London, there are lines can, if developed properly, london.org.uk. London end of it. First things ment based around the current particular problems. The be vital in helping increase first: the project proposals do rail network. Also crucially, plans for connections at Old capacity where it’s needed not form part of a coherent too many of the proposed Oak Common and Euston and enabling significant fur- national transport strategy. HS2 stations are in out of could not unreasonably be ther shift from private car use, At the same time as prom- town locations with only described as a mess. It is as- road freight and aviation to oting HS2 the Government is vague plans for connections tonishing that the plans can rail and connected sustaina- also embarking upon a major to other public transport. have got so far without some ble transport. That’s why programme of road building on HS2 could, if linked to other major operational issues we’re currently working to try the strategic road network, transport and planning policies, having been resolved. Even to get Parliament to amend promoting car-based develop- help spread economic activity the new Mayor has called on the High Speed Rail Bill, ment and reducing funds around the country, but pursued the Euston HS2 development which confers the powers to available for local authorities to in isolation, it could simply to be halted till a solution can construct the scheme and support important bus services. reinforce the imbalance be- be found. The construction of sets out the plans. We hope It is still unclear how HS2 tween London and the South the HS2 terminus there would that the Government will en- will connect with the rest of East and the rest of the UK. cause interminable disruption sure that HS2 will achieve the transport network and how Neither has the Government without apparently creating these aims long before any it will benefit areas of the yet set out its policy on HS2 a satisfactory connection to construction begins. country not directly connected fares. We already have some HS1 and other transport. Al- James MacColl to it. In particular, future links of the highest rail fares in Eu- ternatives for improving the CBT Head of Campaigns WE HAVE A NEW WEBSITE AT: BETTERTRANSPORTLONDON.ORG.UK, AND A TWITTER ACCOUNT: @CBTransportLDN rural areas, many suburban areas education and health services. and towns where buses disappear Safer London streets that are fit in the evenings and on Sundays. for humans require a significant re- The wages Those without a car, the majority, duction in traffic says ‘Human are excluded from access to further Streets - The Mayors Vision for Cy- education, employment, access to cling three years on’. In Oslo, car- public and other services and free plans aim for ‘as little as possi- many aspects of public and social ble’ motorised traffic, including of pollution activity. They are in fact discrimi- electric cars, ‘they just take up too nated against. Those most affected much space’. come within the scope of the Of course minimising motorised The new Mayor of London Sadiq Equality Act and of much human traffic in London won’t make mon- Khan, who suffers from adult onset rights law. ey for the automobile industry but asthma, says he is determined to There should be a right to public then again you never see broccoli cut air pollution. He has an- transport. It is as important to the being advertised on TV! nounced the introduction of a Tox- majority of the population and to Rosalind Readhead and icity Charge which will charge a normal modern life as access to Margherita Rendel pre-Euro4 diesel vehicles (mostly registered before 2005) an addi- tional £10 to enter the Congestion zone by 2017. He is also bringing It has been nearly a year since forward and possibly expanding Volkswagen admitted they had the ULEZ to Greater London. Mean- intentionally programmed 11 while he is lobbying the Govern- ment for a new Clean Air Act which million cars to cheat emissions will control pollution from traffic. testing. Experts say diesel will have to be VW had invested heavily in flawed banned from the streets of London diesel technology and wanted to to realistically bring air quality to max out its investment. Cheating WHO safe limits. allowed them to market fraudulent Electric vehicles are often re- ‘clean diesel’ passenger cars as the ferred to as ‘zero-emission vehi- way forward. Tax incentives and cles’ . However in 2010 a Renault encouragement by Government to advert claiming its Electric vehicles go ‘green’ contributed to London were ‘zero-emission’ was banned licenced diesel vehicles reaching a by the Advertising Standards Au- record 774,513 in 2015. Diesel fuel thority. It was pointed out that a is responsible for 40% of air vehicle charged using energy pollution in London. sourced from the UK national grid Cars are even now responsible would be majority coal and gas for more than half, 53 per cent, of powered as renewables only make all transport generated green- up a very small proportion of the Pedestrianising Oxford house gas emissions including par- Electric Grid, so just polluting ticulates and the production of en- somewhere else. There is also ad- ergy (oil refineries and power ditional non-tailpipe air pollution Street by 2020 stations) for transport (DECC stats). caused by brake and tyre wear and In comparison, public transport Following Sadiq Khan’s manifesto commitment that he would ‘work production. As Jenny Bates of with Westminster council, local businesses, Transport for London and produces only 6.7 per cent. Any in- Friends of the Earth has comment- taxis, to pedestrianise Oxford Street, Deputy Mayor Val Shawcross has crease in the production of green- ed, ‘There is no such thing as a lost no time in announcing that Oxford Street will be pedestrianised by house gases from cars increases clean car’. 2020. Joe Irvin, CEO of Living Streets, which has been in the forefront of the existing damage occurring A University of Leeds report fore- the campaign said: ‘This is a brilliant start to transforming London into from climate change such as casts that driverless cars will lead a world-leading walking city, improving the health of those living and floods and droughts throughout to a substantial mode shift from working in it.’ the world leading to the destruc- public transport to cars. As the re- At a recent meeting of the GLA Transport Committee there was general tion of livelihoods and migration. port acknowledges, this would agreement that the present environment in Oxford Street is unaccept- There are 1.1 million people in lead to an increase in the use of able citing congestion, safety and air quality. However many objections London who suffer from respiratory energy despite improvements in were raised to full pedestrianisation. Alex Williams, TfL’s planning conditions and are vulnerable to the design of vehicles. Apart from director, referred to the difficulties for finding terminating space for unhealthy air pollution levels, ac- the creation of more pollution and buses at each end of the street and suggested that there was a need to cording to the British Lung Founda- health problems there is also a look at the entire bus network in central London. He suggested that tion. High spikes in air pollution consequence for people who don’t Crossrail would make a reduction in bus numbers possible.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
    [Show full text]
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • 110 Years of the Great Northern & City
    110 YEARS OF THE GREAT NORTHERN & CITY 110 years ago, on 14 February 1904, the short Great Northern & City Railway opened between Finsbury Park and Moorgate with intermediate stations at Drayton Park, Essex Road and Old Street. Highbury opened later, on 28 June 1904, becoming Highbury & Islington on 20 July 1922. Despite aspirations of things much grander (through trains to Moorgate from the Great Northern main line Railway) it remained a relatively quiet backwater, although it did have its moments at peak times with a 2½-minute service of five or six-car trains scheduled – and with skip-stop operation. For the most part, however, two-car trains sufficed at off-peak times. The Metropolitan Railway took over the GN&C in 1913, although the line remained ‘isolated’ until the line was absorbed into British Rail’s Great Northern Electrification scheme in the 1970s. After London Transport was formed in 1933, it became the Northern City Line but in later years (and after the closure of the Finsbury Park – Drayton Park section) became known as the Highbury Branch (of the Northern Line). Of course the line’s history has been told in various publications before, so this will be a short pictorial look at the early days. Above: A line up of GN&C Stock on the stock connection ramp at Drayton Park, comprising mostly the original wooden-bodied stock. However, the fourth car from the camera is one of the all-steel cars. This photo shows the GN&C’s outside current rail system. The brick-built ‘hut’ seen beneath the third car survived until a few years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail - the Application of Advanced Engineering and Science to Grow London's Transport Network
    1 Crossrail - the Application of Advanced Engineering and Science to Grow London's Transport Network 1. Introduction Crossrail is a rail network which goes under London and aims both to improve journey times and to link East and West London by creating an extra 42 kilometres of twin-bore tunnels, 21 kilometres of which will be under central London. It is currently the largest civil engineering project in Europe1, has over 10,000 people working on it and will have cost £16 billion2 by the time it opens to the public in 20183. While there have been plans to connect East to West London since the 1880s, it was first officially proposed in 1974 by the Department for Environment and the Greater London Council4. Currently over 1 billion tube journeys are undertaken each year and as an extra million people are expected to use London's public transport in the next 10 to 15 years, the various stations and train lines will soon be reaching their maximum capacity5. Crossrail is expected to be used by 200 million people each year and to provide a 10% increase to London's rail capacity6. This essay sets out the principal scientific and engineering problems the engineers faced while planning the route and constructing the tunnels and discusses how they creatively solved them using advanced engineering and science. 2. Planning the route Determining the optimum route and depth of a tunnel through an environment such as the City of London is an extremely complex task. Engineers are looking to minimise the cost and timetable for construction while taking into account underground obstacles and hazards; minimising damage to archaeological sites and historic buildings; taking advantage of the most consistent and easy to tunnel sub-soil conditions; satisfying UK safety authorities7 and of course linking up with existing infrastructure so as to create a coherent travel network.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartometro London Edition
    @g A B C How Wood (Herts) D E F G H I J King's Cross - St. Pancras Detail Level crossing Pad 22/08/1865 London Underground : 25/09/1949 removed from London Underground : 30/03/1994 2 1 1 2 Blake Hall Closed 31/10/1981 North Weald Loco Pit Ron's Siding Spur Version 3.4 3 Hotel Curve 2 1 York Road Curve Ongar Metropolitan Kings Langley h tt Maiden p Lane Chesham Bricket Wood : Curve 1 / r 2 Goods yard August 2015 /c f . GREATER LONDON ar e t re Redland Road o. .f Level crossing Stone Siding metro Cheshunt Kings Cross Tunnel Overground y g y Kings Cross loop Cheshunt Junction 1 Up Goods Loop Underground, Central 27 1 Epping Theobalds Grove 2 1 Transport Tracks Map Overground, DLR, Level crossing Level crossing Garston (Hertfordshire) Radlett Tracks map with platforms, connections & depots Tramlink & National Rail Waltham Cross Watford Tunnels 24/04/1865 London Underground : 25/09/1949 to Brill & VerneyJunction © 2015 - Franklin JARRIER - Reproduction prohibited without the permission of the author - [email protected] - http://carto.metro.free.fr (part of the metropolitan from 1892 to 1936) Metropolitan Amersham Radlett Junction 31 32 Watford North 3 2 34 NR / LUL 1 Turkey Street boudary 01/09/1892 Hadley Wood North tunnels 2 Theydon Bois 1 Level crossing Enfield Lock Chalfont & Latimer Hadley Wood 3 2 1 Watford north Junction Hadley Wood South tunnels 11 10 Gordon Hill 7 6 9 8 Overground Watford Yard 3 5 1 4 Watford Junction 2 Watford 08/07/1889 south Junction Metropolitan 21 22 1 Watford 23 2 24 Level crossing Elstree & Borehamwood
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Document for Winchmore Hill Ward Forum, 19/01/2016 19:30
    Public Document Pack WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM - 19.1.2016 MINIUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM HELD ON TUESDAY, 19TH JANUARY, 2016 Present: Cllr. Dinah Barry (chair), Cllr. Ertan Hurer Apologies: Cllr. Elaine Hayward, Cllr. Bambos Charalambous (arriving late from an earlier meeting), Andy Barker (FLDRA), Notes: DB 1. REPORT FROM LOCAL POLICE PC Denise Thorpe gave a report covering the last three months. • Burglaries and car crime: theft of and from vehicles, is lower than for the same period last year. • Most burglaries are taking place between five and six o’clock when residents are still out at work and it is dark. • PC Thorpe has been taking measures to help us to be more secure: - delivering notices to houses if they have been left in darkness, making it evident that no one is home, - delivering notices advising people who have UPVC doors how to lock them securely, - checking motor vehicles to ensure that valuables are not left on display, - Checking car doors are locked - they often aren’t. In one road PC Thorpe found three unlocked cars. Residents should make sure that their automatic locking systems are actually working! 2. LOCAL RAILWAY AND TRAIN SERVICE Graham Smith, Infrastructure Maintenance Delivery Manager at Network Rail (NR) answered questions and listened to concerns. • He is looking to improve the trackside planting near Palmers Green. Trackside clearance is needed for safety but he will make sure it is more sensitively managed in future, • He is looking into the possibility of some planting to screen the track near the skew bridge in Hoppers Road, • He is meeting with Cllr.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterman Numbered Report Template
    Transport Statement Proposed B1 Office Development, 2a Tabernacle Street, Islington 17 August 2011 Waterman Boreham Limited Regent House, Hubert Road, Brentwood, Essex CM14 4JE, United Kingdom t: +44 1277 238 100 f: +44 1277 238 150 www.waterman-boreham.com Content 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................. 2 Site Location & Local Highway Conditions ............................................................................................ 2 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Public Transport ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Underground and Over-ground Railway Stations ............................................................................. 3 Buses ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) Assessment ..................................................................... 4 Walking and Cycle Facilities .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Transport Records at the Public Record Office
    CONTENTS Introduction Page 4 Abbreviations used in this book Page 3 Accidents on the London Underground Page 4 Staff Records Pages 6-7 PART A - List of former ‘British Transport Historical Records’ related to London Transport, which have been transferred to the Greater London Record Office - continued from Part One (additional notes regarding this location) Page 8 PART C - List of former ‘British Transport Historical Records’ related to London Transport, which are still at the Public Record Office - continued from Part One Pages 9-12 PART D - Other records related to London Transport including Government Departments - continued from Part One Pages 13-66 PART E - List of former ‘Department of Education and Science’ records transferred from the PRO to the Victoria & Albert Museum Pages 67 APPENDIX 1 - PRO Class AN2 Pages to follow APPENDIX 2 - PRO Class MT29 Page 51- (on disc) APPENDIX 3 - Other places which have LT related records Pages 68-71 PRO document class headings: AH (Location of Offices Bureau) Page 13 AN (Railway Executive Committee/BTC/British Railways Board) - continued from Part One Pages 14-26 AN2 (Railway Executive Committee, War of 1939. Records cover period from 1939-1947) Pages to follow AT (Department of the Environment and Predecessors) Page 27 AVIA (Ministry of Aviation/Ministry of Aircraft Production) Page 27 AY (Records of various research institutes) Page 27 BL (Council on Tribunals) Page 27 BT (Board of Trade) - continued from Part One Page 28-34 CAB (Cabinet Papers) Page 35-36 CK (Commission for Racial Equality/Race
    [Show full text]
  • How Can This Happen? Railway Tunnel Penetrated by Piles
    How Can This Happen? Railway Tunnel penetrated by Piles. BB – Extracts from RAIB report. Summarised by : Steven Harper - Balfour Beatty Rail Nick Cook – Balfour Beatty Major Projects What Happened? 1. A seven storey residential building commenced piled foundations on 6 March 2013,13m above an undetected railway tunnel. 2. At 10:09 hrs on Friday 8 March 2013 Driver reported that water was flowing from the roof of the tunnel. (Old Street and Essex Road stations on the Northern City line.) 3. Inspection train deployed and 2 x 350mm dia Auger drills had come through the tunnel wall and had fallen onto the track. 4. The piling team were unaware that they had penetrated a tunnel. 5. Attempted to locate the missing sections of auger using metal bars. 6. No accidents or injuries. History 1. The site was vacant since the 1970s. 2. Developer engaged an Architect, Engineer and Land Searches. 3. GI Bore holes done in November 2011 – possible obstructions 4. Planned bore hole depth of 20m, one refused at 14m. 5. The Structural Engineer’s research – no tunnels or sewers. 6. Planning permission was granted for the scheme in March 2012. 7. Principal Contractor passed responsibility onto Piling Contractor. 8. Unknown to the designers, 19 of the planned 39 piles would clash. 9. The longest piles would have extended over 9 metres below rail level How did this happen? 1. In 1967 London Borough of Hackney, intended to issue a covenant. 2. This did not happen and did arise clearly on the land searches. 3. Ordnance Survey do not plot London Underground network.
    [Show full text]
  • LPTB NEW WORKS PROGRAMME 80TH ANNIVERSARY a TRIBUTE to a MAJOR EXPANSION of the UNDERGROUND NETWORK by John P Mccrickard
    LPTB NEW WORKS PROGRAMME 80TH ANNIVERSARY A TRIBUTE TO A MAJOR EXPANSION OF THE UNDERGROUND NETWORK by John P McCrickard Eighty years ago, on the 5 June 1935, Chancellor of the Exchequer Neville Chamberlain in the National (Coalition) Government announced to Parliament that “the London Passenger Transport Board, London and North Eastern Railway and the Great Western Railway will enter at once upon a programme of great improvements and extensions of London transport”. This bold and ambitious plan comprised several LPTB tube railway extensions out of the London central area to connect with various suburban lines of the LNER and GWR, which would be electrified for the purpose allowing direct Underground services to the City and West End. Also included were a number of station reconstructions in the central area to deal with burgeoning traffic, together with ancillary works such as power supply enhancements. Overall, the prime aim was to deal with serious problems of congestion afflicting the existing transport services, especially from the North-East London area into Liverpool Street, where severe peak-hour overcrowding reigned. A supplementary Commons statement by Chamberlain on 18 June 1935 clarified further details of the plan. Funding of the expected total cost of £40m would be by loans raised by a Finance Company on which the Government would guarantee both the principal and interest. This so-called “cheap money” would enable these important public transport schemes to be executed – such improvements by the railway companies had previously proved well-nigh impossible due to high costs of borrowing the required capital on the open market.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Project to Create UK's First Intercity Digital
    Major project to create UK’s first intercity digital railway continues June 8, 2021 Great Northern passengers on the Northern City Line, one of the most important routes into the City of London, will enjoy more reliable journeys by summer next year. The reliability boost will come from work to upgrade track and signalling on the route, in a key stage of the East Coast Digital Programme, which will create the first intercity digital railway in the UK, fitting trains with the latest in-cab signalling technology and removing the old lineside signals. This will mean that signallers will be able to communicate with trains continuously rather than only at fixed signal points, responding in real time, which will benefit passengers by reducing delays and significantly improving performance. However, to carry out this vital work, there will be some temporary service changes for passengers. There will be six weekends of track closures between Finsbury Park and Moorgate this summer as Network Rail teams work to install new equipment. These closures will be in place on the following dates: Saturday, 19 and Sunday, 20 June Saturday, 26 and Sunday, 27 June Saturday, 10 and Sunday, 11 July Saturday, 7 and Sunday, 8 August Saturday, 28, Sunday, 29 and Monday, 30 August Saturday, 4 September and Sunday, 5 September During these closures, trains will be diverted into King’s Cross station. Passengers who need to travel during this time are advised to plan ahead via National Rail Enquiries or via greatnorthernrail.com. There may be further dates when work is required and Great Northern and Network Rail will keep passengers informed of any additional impact on services.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartometro London Edition
    © 2011 - Franklin JARRIER Contact : [email protected] http://carto.metro.free.fr ThisDocument is cop A B C D E F G H I J o.free.fr Former goods yard 22/08/1856 London Underground : 25/09/1949 removed from London Underground : 30/03/1994 2 1 Blake Hall Closed 31/10/1981 North Weald Version 2.0 Ongar Metropolitan h t tp Chesham : 1 / r 2 Goods yard May 2011 /c f a . GREATER LONDON rto ree .metro.f 1 yrighted,you arenot 27 com http://carto.metr Central 1 Epping 2 Underground, Overground, DLR 1 Tracks map with platforms, connections & depots 25/09/1949 allowed tous import, 24/04/1865 &Tramlink Map London Underground : to Brill & VerneyJunction (part of the metropolitan © 2011 - Franklin JARRIER - Reproduction prohibited without the permission of the author - [email protected] - http://carto.metro.free.fr from 1892 to 1936) Metropolitan Amersham : carto.metro@gmail. 31 32 3 2 34 1 01/09/1892 2 Theydon Bois 1 Chalfont & Latimer 3 2 1 Overground Watford Junction 11 10 7 6 9 8 3 1 4 2 08/07/1889 e or extractany data Metropolitan 21 22 1 Watford 23 2 24 lin JARRIERlin Contact 2 Chorleywood Watford 1 High Street Piccadilly 2 Cockfosters 1 3 4 24 23 25 2 Croxley Green 26 1 22 22 27 23 34 28 High Barnet Watford High Street 21 35 36 29 21 30 26 Northern 2 31 02/11/1925 3 Junction 1 Sidings 31/07/1933 27 30 28 31 32 29 33 53 54 High Barnet 29A 51 52 50 48 49 Goods yard 46 47 45 43 44 41 42 39 40 Colne 37 38 36 32 33 34 35 15/06/1906 Junction 1 Watford Oakwood 2 Croxley 1 2 Croxley West Junction Closed 30/03/2003 Cockfosters Depot 22 Loughton
    [Show full text]