Cartometro London Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rail Accident Report
Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis -
The Operator's Story Appendix
Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation. -
110 Years of the Great Northern & City
110 YEARS OF THE GREAT NORTHERN & CITY 110 years ago, on 14 February 1904, the short Great Northern & City Railway opened between Finsbury Park and Moorgate with intermediate stations at Drayton Park, Essex Road and Old Street. Highbury opened later, on 28 June 1904, becoming Highbury & Islington on 20 July 1922. Despite aspirations of things much grander (through trains to Moorgate from the Great Northern main line Railway) it remained a relatively quiet backwater, although it did have its moments at peak times with a 2½-minute service of five or six-car trains scheduled – and with skip-stop operation. For the most part, however, two-car trains sufficed at off-peak times. The Metropolitan Railway took over the GN&C in 1913, although the line remained ‘isolated’ until the line was absorbed into British Rail’s Great Northern Electrification scheme in the 1970s. After London Transport was formed in 1933, it became the Northern City Line but in later years (and after the closure of the Finsbury Park – Drayton Park section) became known as the Highbury Branch (of the Northern Line). Of course the line’s history has been told in various publications before, so this will be a short pictorial look at the early days. Above: A line up of GN&C Stock on the stock connection ramp at Drayton Park, comprising mostly the original wooden-bodied stock. However, the fourth car from the camera is one of the all-steel cars. This photo shows the GN&C’s outside current rail system. The brick-built ‘hut’ seen beneath the third car survived until a few years ago. -
The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2. -
Barking and Dagenham Report 2021 Barking and Dagenham Report 2021
Housing supply analysis Connectivity Development pipeline Focus on: Barking and knightfrank.com/research Dagenham Research 2021 BARKING AND DAGENHAM REPORT 2021 BARKING AND DAGENHAM REPORT 2021 50% below asking prices 1km around Average disposable income is expected developments coming forward including Poplar Station. to rise 51% over the next decade. Growth at urban village Abbey Quay which is WHAT DOES THE NEXT On the rental side, a similar story in GVA, a measure of goods and services adjacent to Barking town centre by the emerges with average asking rents produced in an area, is expected to climb River Roding, and as part of the 440-acre DECADE LOOK LIKE FOR for a two-bedroom flat in the vicinity around a fifth. Barking Riverside masterplan. of Barking Station currently £1,261 BARKING & DAGENHAM? per month and £975 per month for Buyer preferences Dagenham Dock. This is 10% lower than The pandemic has encouraged Fig 3. Housing delivery test: asking rents around Limehouse Station, homebuyers to seek more space both Barking & Dagenham inside and out, while the experience of 2,500 uu the past year has, for some individuals, The level of new highlighted the importance of having 2,000 Faster transport connections and a growing local economy are development in Barking better access to riverside locations or supporting extensive regeneration in the area. & Dagenham has not kept green space. 1,500 pace with housing need Our latest residential client survey confirmed this, with 66% of respondents 1,000 uu Freeport status and new film studios More homes are planned, with around over that same period and a 3% rise in now viewing having access to a garden Annual Housing Target combined with the imminent arrival of 13,500 units in the development pipeline, nearby Tower Hamlets, which includes or outdoor space as a higher priority 500 historic City of London markets, Crossrail according to Molior, whichwill be delivered Canary Wharf. -
Crossrail - the Application of Advanced Engineering and Science to Grow London's Transport Network
1 Crossrail - the Application of Advanced Engineering and Science to Grow London's Transport Network 1. Introduction Crossrail is a rail network which goes under London and aims both to improve journey times and to link East and West London by creating an extra 42 kilometres of twin-bore tunnels, 21 kilometres of which will be under central London. It is currently the largest civil engineering project in Europe1, has over 10,000 people working on it and will have cost £16 billion2 by the time it opens to the public in 20183. While there have been plans to connect East to West London since the 1880s, it was first officially proposed in 1974 by the Department for Environment and the Greater London Council4. Currently over 1 billion tube journeys are undertaken each year and as an extra million people are expected to use London's public transport in the next 10 to 15 years, the various stations and train lines will soon be reaching their maximum capacity5. Crossrail is expected to be used by 200 million people each year and to provide a 10% increase to London's rail capacity6. This essay sets out the principal scientific and engineering problems the engineers faced while planning the route and constructing the tunnels and discusses how they creatively solved them using advanced engineering and science. 2. Planning the route Determining the optimum route and depth of a tunnel through an environment such as the City of London is an extremely complex task. Engineers are looking to minimise the cost and timetable for construction while taking into account underground obstacles and hazards; minimising damage to archaeological sites and historic buildings; taking advantage of the most consistent and easy to tunnel sub-soil conditions; satisfying UK safety authorities7 and of course linking up with existing infrastructure so as to create a coherent travel network. -
More Than Just a Driver
More than just a driver 44 ........... Other road users 46 ........... Using the public address (PA) system 49 ...........Pre-recorded announcements 43 More than just a driver More than just a driver Being a professional bus driver requires more than just giving your passengers a safe, smooth ride. This section gives you guidance on other aspects of your job which will help you keep up your status as a professional. More than just a driver Other road users 44 Other road users There are many more cyclists using London’s roads and you should take special care to ensure you are aware of cyclists at all times. Look out for Barclays Cycle Superhighways across the Capital, and Barclays Cycle Hire users in central and eastern areas. 1. Give all cyclists space as you overtake (about half the width of your bus, or 1.2m) and do not cut in on cyclists as you approach bus stops. 45 More than just a driver Other road users 2. Do not stop in the Advanced Stop Box. It must be left clear for cyclists. 3. Remember to watch out for motorcyclists, who can now use certain bus lanes. 4. Watch out for pedestrians and keep your speed low. Use dipped headlights, especially in contra-flow bus lanes and central areas, such as Oxford Street or Piccadilly. Your company may ask you to use dipped headlights at all times. 5. At road junctions, be aware of other large vehicles such as lorries. Like buses, they need a wide area to turn. 6. Remember, taxis can use bus lanes so be prepared to stop if they are picking up or setting down passengers. -
Minutes Document for Winchmore Hill Ward Forum, 19/01/2016 19:30
Public Document Pack WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM - 19.1.2016 MINIUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM HELD ON TUESDAY, 19TH JANUARY, 2016 Present: Cllr. Dinah Barry (chair), Cllr. Ertan Hurer Apologies: Cllr. Elaine Hayward, Cllr. Bambos Charalambous (arriving late from an earlier meeting), Andy Barker (FLDRA), Notes: DB 1. REPORT FROM LOCAL POLICE PC Denise Thorpe gave a report covering the last three months. • Burglaries and car crime: theft of and from vehicles, is lower than for the same period last year. • Most burglaries are taking place between five and six o’clock when residents are still out at work and it is dark. • PC Thorpe has been taking measures to help us to be more secure: - delivering notices to houses if they have been left in darkness, making it evident that no one is home, - delivering notices advising people who have UPVC doors how to lock them securely, - checking motor vehicles to ensure that valuables are not left on display, - Checking car doors are locked - they often aren’t. In one road PC Thorpe found three unlocked cars. Residents should make sure that their automatic locking systems are actually working! 2. LOCAL RAILWAY AND TRAIN SERVICE Graham Smith, Infrastructure Maintenance Delivery Manager at Network Rail (NR) answered questions and listened to concerns. • He is looking to improve the trackside planting near Palmers Green. Trackside clearance is needed for safety but he will make sure it is more sensitively managed in future, • He is looking into the possibility of some planting to screen the track near the skew bridge in Hoppers Road, • He is meeting with Cllr. -
Buses from Barking
Barking Station – Zone 4 i Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map 1 Buses from Barking 74 400 LAVENDER PLACE FORSYTHIA CLOSE 2 56 Uphall School 5 BANKSIDE ROAD Playing Field 397 WISTERIA CLOSE 1 SOUTHBOURNE GARDENS 22 54 4 3 Y R O A D 2 55 Loxford 4 HARVE 37 Hall 70 LOXFORD LANE 16 24 Barking Abbey 36 The Lake Comprehensive School 23 B MEDWAY CLOSE U 169 1 T 415 T 1 FAN 1 S Other buses from Barking 12 SB Clayhall ROAD B 64 LAVENDER PLACE N U AZALEA CLOSE 11 EB R 1 3 NORMA SH for Hurstleigh Gardens 32 R Y 2 ST. LEONARDS GARDENS r 1 e RTHE Schoolday services: R t Barking Park ING NO RN R O RK E A PITTMAN GDNS a L A A JASMINE CLOSE 86 IEF WE N Loxford D W B D A N E R O A D R 48 W O Q Polyclinic rd A 687 towards Dagenham Park School o D A 13 f D x A VE Lo A WB O K 16 Barking Park R 44 24 1 F E UPHALL ROAD E R Fullwell Avenue S A X O N R O A D Tennis Courts I I 11 N 14 72 L E N G 10 S 15 E N 34 ROAD TULI D R O 18 I R D G A P G A R D E N S A S H L L M A I A H O R C G T 54 N A R T. -
Report Consultation Point
Consultation Point: Foreword Person ID 1214453 Full Name Mr Steven Fayers ID 41 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Individual/Resident Date Received - Date Received: 2016-11-29 Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate No Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to Legally Compliant be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the No Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to Please see attached letter describing the reasons for the plan being unsound. -
Standard Schedule UL25-43096-Ssu-SN-1-1
Schedule UL25-43096-sSu-SN-1-1 Schedule information Route: UL25 No. of vehicles used on 16 schedule: Service change: 43096 - SCHEDULE Implementation date: 13 February 2016 Day type: sSu - Special Sunday Operator: SN - SULLIVAN BUSES Option: 1 Version: 1 Schedule comment: Copy from Schedule: UL25-41666-sSu-SN-1-1 Option comment: Option 1 Timing points Timing point Transit node Stop BARKAR S Barking, Abbey Road Temporary Stand J4839 ABBEY ROAD, LONDON ROAD BARKAR Barking, Abbey Road Temporary Stand S BARKSN Barking Station W401 BARKING STATION BP5755 Barking Station BARKSN Barking Station W401 BARKING STATION RR06 Barking Station DAGESN Dagenham East Station WF01 DAGENHAM EAST STATION 18308 Dagenham East Station DAGESN Dagenham East Station WF01 DAGENHAM EAST STATION 18309 Dagenham East Station ELMPSN Elm Park Station V604 ELM PK STN 18380 Elm Park Station ELMPSN Elm Park Station V604 ELM PK STN 18381 Elm Park Station HORNSN Hornchurch Station V516 STN LN HORNCHURCH STN 8531 Hornchurch Station HORNSN Hornchurch Station V516 STN LN HORNCHURCH STN BP1789 Hornchurch Station SN SOUTH MIMMS J8337 SOUTH MIMMS BUS GARAGE SN SOUTH MIMMS UPBGSN Upminster Bridge Station V511 UPMINSTER BRIDGE STN 9766 Upminster Bridge Station UPBGSN Upminster Bridge Station V511 UPMINSTER BRIDGE STN 9767 Upminster Bridge Station UPMNSC S Upminster Station Car Park Temporary Stand J4127 UPMINSTER STATION CAR PARK UPMNSCUpminster Station Car Park Temporary Stand S UPMNSN Upminster Station VQ04 UPMINSTER STN 25139 Upminster Stn / St Lawrence Road UPMNSN Upminster Station VQ05 UPMINSTER STN 25138 Upminster Station Crosslinks Page 1 of 10 UL25-43096-sSu-SN-1-1 This schedule has no trips with crosslinks. -
Tfl's REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION
Draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy Statutory consultation with the public and stakeholders TfL’S REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION: Appendices 1, 2 and 3 Annexes B and C March 2010 Contents Appendix 1 - List of Stakeholders consulted .............................................................. 3 Appendix 2 - List of Stakeholders who responded to the consultation ..................... 14 Appendix 3 – List of meetings relevant to the development of the draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy.................................................................................................... 19 Annex B – Summary for each stakeholder response received ................................. 24 Annex C - TfL’s consideration of late responses to the consultation ........................