DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterman Numbered Report Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterman Numbered Report Template Transport Statement Proposed B1 Office Development, 2a Tabernacle Street, Islington 17 August 2011 Waterman Boreham Limited Regent House, Hubert Road, Brentwood, Essex CM14 4JE, United Kingdom t: +44 1277 238 100 f: +44 1277 238 150 www.waterman-boreham.com Content 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................. 2 Site Location & Local Highway Conditions ............................................................................................ 2 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Public Transport ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Underground and Over-ground Railway Stations ............................................................................. 3 Buses ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) Assessment ..................................................................... 4 Walking and Cycle Facilities .................................................................................................................. 5 Barclays Cycle Hire................................................................................................................................ 5 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 5 3. Local and National Policy ................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Policy Guidance Note 13: Transport (PPG13)........................................................................ 6 The London Plan July 2011 ................................................................................................................... 6 The London Borough of Islington Core Strategy (February 2011) ........................................................ 7 4. Development Proposals ...................................................................................................................... 8 Parking Provision ................................................................................................................................... 8 Cycle Parking ......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Traffic Generation and Servicing ....................................................................................................... 9 Traffic Generation .................................................................................................................................. 9 Servicing ................................................................................................................................................ 9 6. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Tables Table 1: 2a Tabernacle Street : Existing Uses and Floor Area ................................................................. 2 Table 2: Bus Stops and Services within Walking Distance of the Proposed Office Development ............ 3 Table 3: 2a Tabernacle Street : Proposed Uses and Floor Areas ............................................................ 8 Table 4: Predicted Modal Split / Daily Trip Generation – Proposed B1 Office, 1,428sq.m GEA .............. 9 Appendices A. Site Location Plan B. PTAL Calculation C. TRAVL Database Transport Statement Project Number: MB/MS/D/TRN 10573 Document Reference: Final R:\Projects\Team_D\Team_D\TRN10573 - 2a Tabernacle Steet, Islington\Reports\17.8.11_Final_ Transport Statement_MB.docx 1. Introduction 1.1. Waterman Boreham Ltd have been instructed by Durley Investment Corporation to produce a Transport Statement (TS) to assess the transport and highways impacts of 1,754sqm B1 Office development on the site of the existing building at 2a Tabernacle Street in the London Borough of Islington. 1.2. The site comprises of existing property number 2a Tabernacle Street which used to be occupied by a bar, restaurant and a private members club and office. The building has been damaged by fire and the development proposal is to redevelop the site and change the use in order to bring the vacant site back into use as a modern B1 Office. The property is located on the eastern side of Tabernacle Street to the north of the junction with Worship Street. 1.3. This report provides a detailed description of the site and the surrounding highway network including accessibility by public transport, by cycle and by foot. No parking provision will be provided as part of this development proposal, as such no highway capacity analysis has been undertaken. On the same basis a Travel Plan has not been produced for this development due to there being no car parking associated with the site, and the site being afforded exceptional public transport accessibility with the highest Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) of 6b which is the highest. In addition, the report considers how the proposed development will be serviced and sets out the likely number of associated delivery vehicles. 1 Transport Statement Project Number: MB/MS/D/TRN 10573 Document Reference: Final R:\Projects\Team_D\Team_D\TRN10573 - 2a Tabernacle Steet, Islington\Reports\17.8.11_Final_ Transport Statement_MB.docx 2. Existing Conditions Site Location & Local Highway Conditions 2.1. The site comprises of property number 2a located on the eastern side of Tabernacle Street to the north of the junction with Worship Street, in the London Borough of Islington. The site used to be occupied by a bar, restaurant and private members club and office, however the building has been damaged by fire and is currently vacant. There is no car parking provision associated with the existing site or associated traffic generation as the site is vacant. The existing floor areas associated with the site are detailed below: Table 1: 2a Tabernacle Street : Existing Uses and Floor Area Floors Existing Use / Area sq.m GEA Basement A3 / A4 (Restaurant / Bar) 320sq.m (3,444sq.ft) Ground A4 / A4 (Restaurant / Bar) 326sq.m (3,509sq.ft) First A4 in association with Private Member Club 239sq.m (2,573sq.ft) Second A4 in association with Private Member Club 239sq.m (2,573sq.ft) Third B1 (Office) 239sq.m (2,573sq.ft) Fourth N/A Total 1,363sq.m (14,671sq.ft) 2.2. A plan detailing the site location in relation to the local highway network, bus stops, Underground Stations / Train Stations and Barclay’s cycle hire points is provided at Appendix A of this report. 2.3. Tabernacle Street is a one-way street and runs in a northerly direction between Worship Street to the south and Paul Street to the north. Footways are provided on both sides of Tabernacle Street and limited waiting parking restrictions (single yellow line) also operate on both sides of the carriageway between 7am and 11pm Monday to Saturday. A parking bay is located just to the north of the development site on the eastern side of Tabernacle Street fronting properties 4-14 and provides parking for permit holders only between 08:30am – 6:30pm Monday to Friday and 08:30am – 1:30 pm on Saturdays. 2.4. Worship Street forms a priority junction with the A501 City Road to the west of the site which in turn provides access to bus stops and access to Old Street underground station to the north and Moorgate Underground Station to the south. Accessibility 2.5. The modal choice for travel for a particular journey is dependent on a number of factors. These include the type of development, trip purpose, and availability of public transport, and distance from the development. This section of the report considers the sustainability of the site in terms of accessibility to public transport infrastructure as well as opportunities for cycling and walking. 2 Transport Statement Project Number: MB/MS/D/TRN 10573 Document Reference: Final R:\Projects\Team_D\Team_D\TRN10573 - 2a Tabernacle Steet, Islington\Reports\17.8.11_Final_ Transport Statement_MB.docx Public Transport Underground and Over-ground Railway Stations 2.6. The nearest underground station is Old Street, which is approximately 500 metres walking distance to the north of the site. Old Street Station is a central London National Rail and London Underground Station located at the junction of Old Street and City Road just north of the City of London boundary. The station is on the Bank branch of London Undergrounds Northern Line, between Moorgate and Angel Stations. It is also between Moorgate and Essex Road stations on National Rail Northern City Line. The Northern City Line is a railway line from Moorgate to Finsbury Park operates between Monday – Friday. 2.7. Moorgate station is located approximately 530 metres walking distance to the south of the site. Moorgate station is a Central London railway terminus and London Underground station, it provides National Rail services by First Capital Connect for Hertford, Welwyn Garden City and Letchworth and also serves
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Report 03/2014 February 2014 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London 8 March 2013 Contents Summary 5 Introduction 6 Preface 6 Key definitions 6 The incident 7 Summary of the incident 7 Context 7 Events preceding the incident 9 Events following the incident 11 Consequences of the incident 11 The investigation 12 Sources of evidence 12 Key facts and analysis
    [Show full text]
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • 110 Years of the Great Northern & City
    110 YEARS OF THE GREAT NORTHERN & CITY 110 years ago, on 14 February 1904, the short Great Northern & City Railway opened between Finsbury Park and Moorgate with intermediate stations at Drayton Park, Essex Road and Old Street. Highbury opened later, on 28 June 1904, becoming Highbury & Islington on 20 July 1922. Despite aspirations of things much grander (through trains to Moorgate from the Great Northern main line Railway) it remained a relatively quiet backwater, although it did have its moments at peak times with a 2½-minute service of five or six-car trains scheduled – and with skip-stop operation. For the most part, however, two-car trains sufficed at off-peak times. The Metropolitan Railway took over the GN&C in 1913, although the line remained ‘isolated’ until the line was absorbed into British Rail’s Great Northern Electrification scheme in the 1970s. After London Transport was formed in 1933, it became the Northern City Line but in later years (and after the closure of the Finsbury Park – Drayton Park section) became known as the Highbury Branch (of the Northern Line). Of course the line’s history has been told in various publications before, so this will be a short pictorial look at the early days. Above: A line up of GN&C Stock on the stock connection ramp at Drayton Park, comprising mostly the original wooden-bodied stock. However, the fourth car from the camera is one of the all-steel cars. This photo shows the GN&C’s outside current rail system. The brick-built ‘hut’ seen beneath the third car survived until a few years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabeth Line
    COMPLETING ELIZABETH LINE THE ELIZABETH LINE Trial Running Update TRIAL RUNNING Plumstead Sidings PROJECT UPDATE WHAT IS TRIAL RUNNING? Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its Throughout the Trial Running programme Crossrail will Trial Running marks the point at which the Railways and complex final stages. Crossrail and Transport steadily increase the numbers of trains running in the tunnels. Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 This will then be further increased and will allow the railway (ROGS) apply for the first time in the Central Operating for London (TfL) are working to ensure the and the supporting systems to be operated as close as Section. Crossrail transitions from following the construction earliest possible opening for the Elizabeth line. possible to an operational timetable. regulations to following Rail regulations. The project is nearing the next important milestone and There is important work to be done but we will take the time Following a readiness review, we will sign over control of the expects to commence extensive commissioning of the railway needed to get it right. Our top priority is a safe railway which central operating section to TfL as infrastructure manager as in spring 2021. This is a crucial moment in the project with the London and the UK can rely on. we transition to ROGS and operate under the Railway Rule railway on track to open in the first half of 2022. Book. From that moment forward, TfL’s service and The progress we have seen over recent months highlights the infrastructure managers will be accountable for the safety, The next phase, Trial Running, involves integrated trials of clear path we have towards completing the Elizabeth line and operation and maintenance of the railway, and the Trial the railway to demonstrate that the Elizabeth line is safe and commencing passenger services in the first half of 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Norwich Direct Train
    London To Norwich Direct Train Kristos gurgles her incautiousness frontally, dree and patchier. Nightmarish Adnan usually calibrate some lurkers or sleet jawbreakingly. Weighted Stillman bade ministerially or bales harmonically when Wyatan is rhotic. East anglia is direct, there are implemented and can travel entry to change or parks on this car, no direct train to london norwich. How to Travel From London to Norwich by Train Bus TripSavvy. National Express runs a regular bus service between London Victoria Coach now and the Norwich Bus Station which leaves London at. Bus from London to Norwich Find schedules Compare prices Book Megabus National Express and National Express tickets. The cheapest train connections from London to Norwich. When creating an average northern advanced fare. Norwich is also elm hill and table service is definitely worth trying when it from your train to yorkshire and make significant damage to alcohol, london to norwich direct train! Click on a gift card pin. What is Norwich like about visit? Get cheap train tickets to Norwich with our split up search. The direct from london st pancras international partners sites selected are as nationalrail and direct train tickets between london liverpool street every kind of. Our London Sidcup Hotel is Located between London and Kent and just 100m from the Train them Free Wi-Fi Throughout Your content Book Direct. How it is regarded as a colourful excursion to norwich here when we cannot wait to ironically for all! Connect to new azuma trains from time limit fuel facility supplies renewable compressed natural habitats, so just under a button down.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail - the Application of Advanced Engineering and Science to Grow London's Transport Network
    1 Crossrail - the Application of Advanced Engineering and Science to Grow London's Transport Network 1. Introduction Crossrail is a rail network which goes under London and aims both to improve journey times and to link East and West London by creating an extra 42 kilometres of twin-bore tunnels, 21 kilometres of which will be under central London. It is currently the largest civil engineering project in Europe1, has over 10,000 people working on it and will have cost £16 billion2 by the time it opens to the public in 20183. While there have been plans to connect East to West London since the 1880s, it was first officially proposed in 1974 by the Department for Environment and the Greater London Council4. Currently over 1 billion tube journeys are undertaken each year and as an extra million people are expected to use London's public transport in the next 10 to 15 years, the various stations and train lines will soon be reaching their maximum capacity5. Crossrail is expected to be used by 200 million people each year and to provide a 10% increase to London's rail capacity6. This essay sets out the principal scientific and engineering problems the engineers faced while planning the route and constructing the tunnels and discusses how they creatively solved them using advanced engineering and science. 2. Planning the route Determining the optimum route and depth of a tunnel through an environment such as the City of London is an extremely complex task. Engineers are looking to minimise the cost and timetable for construction while taking into account underground obstacles and hazards; minimising damage to archaeological sites and historic buildings; taking advantage of the most consistent and easy to tunnel sub-soil conditions; satisfying UK safety authorities7 and of course linking up with existing infrastructure so as to create a coherent travel network.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Ipswich
    GREAT EASTERN MAIN LINE LONDON TO IPSWICH © Copyright RailSimulator.com 2012, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Train Simulator – GEML London Ipswich 1 ROUTE INFORMATIONINFORMATION................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................... 444 1.1 History ....................................................................................................................4 1.1.1 Liverpool Street Station ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 Electrification................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Line Features ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Rolling Stock .............................................................................................................6 1.3 Franchise History .......................................................................................................6 2 CLASS 360 ‘DESIRO’ ELECTRIC MULTIPLE UNUNITITITIT................................................................................... ..................... 777 2.1 Class 360 .................................................................................................................7 2.2 Design & Specification ................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Cartometro London Edition
    @g A B C How Wood (Herts) D E F G H I J King's Cross - St. Pancras Detail Level crossing Pad 22/08/1865 London Underground : 25/09/1949 removed from London Underground : 30/03/1994 2 1 1 2 Blake Hall Closed 31/10/1981 North Weald Loco Pit Ron's Siding Spur Version 3.4 3 Hotel Curve 2 1 York Road Curve Ongar Metropolitan Kings Langley h tt Maiden p Lane Chesham Bricket Wood : Curve 1 / r 2 Goods yard August 2015 /c f . GREATER LONDON ar e t re Redland Road o. .f Level crossing Stone Siding metro Cheshunt Kings Cross Tunnel Overground y g y Kings Cross loop Cheshunt Junction 1 Up Goods Loop Underground, Central 27 1 Epping Theobalds Grove 2 1 Transport Tracks Map Overground, DLR, Level crossing Level crossing Garston (Hertfordshire) Radlett Tracks map with platforms, connections & depots Tramlink & National Rail Waltham Cross Watford Tunnels 24/04/1865 London Underground : 25/09/1949 to Brill & VerneyJunction © 2015 - Franklin JARRIER - Reproduction prohibited without the permission of the author - [email protected] - http://carto.metro.free.fr (part of the metropolitan from 1892 to 1936) Metropolitan Amersham Radlett Junction 31 32 Watford North 3 2 34 NR / LUL 1 Turkey Street boudary 01/09/1892 Hadley Wood North tunnels 2 Theydon Bois 1 Level crossing Enfield Lock Chalfont & Latimer Hadley Wood 3 2 1 Watford north Junction Hadley Wood South tunnels 11 10 Gordon Hill 7 6 9 8 Overground Watford Yard 3 5 1 4 Watford Junction 2 Watford 08/07/1889 south Junction Metropolitan 21 22 1 Watford 23 2 24 Level crossing Elstree & Borehamwood
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Document for Winchmore Hill Ward Forum, 19/01/2016 19:30
    Public Document Pack WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM - 19.1.2016 MINIUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WINCHMORE HILL WARD FORUM HELD ON TUESDAY, 19TH JANUARY, 2016 Present: Cllr. Dinah Barry (chair), Cllr. Ertan Hurer Apologies: Cllr. Elaine Hayward, Cllr. Bambos Charalambous (arriving late from an earlier meeting), Andy Barker (FLDRA), Notes: DB 1. REPORT FROM LOCAL POLICE PC Denise Thorpe gave a report covering the last three months. • Burglaries and car crime: theft of and from vehicles, is lower than for the same period last year. • Most burglaries are taking place between five and six o’clock when residents are still out at work and it is dark. • PC Thorpe has been taking measures to help us to be more secure: - delivering notices to houses if they have been left in darkness, making it evident that no one is home, - delivering notices advising people who have UPVC doors how to lock them securely, - checking motor vehicles to ensure that valuables are not left on display, - Checking car doors are locked - they often aren’t. In one road PC Thorpe found three unlocked cars. Residents should make sure that their automatic locking systems are actually working! 2. LOCAL RAILWAY AND TRAIN SERVICE Graham Smith, Infrastructure Maintenance Delivery Manager at Network Rail (NR) answered questions and listened to concerns. • He is looking to improve the trackside planting near Palmers Green. Trackside clearance is needed for safety but he will make sure it is more sensitively managed in future, • He is looking into the possibility of some planting to screen the track near the skew bridge in Hoppers Road, • He is meeting with Cllr.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2AA Capacity Report
    HS2AA RAIL CAPACITY BRIEFING Why HS2 is not needed to solve capacity issues on UK’s railways 9TH September 2013 For more information please contact: Richard Houghton T: 07803 178 037 E: [email protected] HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing Contents Page 1. Summary 3 2. Introduction 4 3. Capacity arguments for HS2 fundamentally flawed 4 4. Future Demand 5 5. Scope to Upgrade WCML 6 6. Euston commuter capacity 7 7. Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds 8 8. Freight Capacity 8 9. Disruption 8 10. Capacity on other routes 9 Page 2 of 9 HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing 1. Summary • WCML will not be full by the mid 2020. Network Rail figures shows that, expect for HS1, it is the least crowded main line into and out of London • Future demand on WCML will only come from growth in total transport market as switch from road and air has already happened post upgrade • Nationally number of rail journeys fell in the first quarter of 2013 • Commuter capacity issues into Euston can be solved immediately at no cost by allowing commuters to use Virgin trains • Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds will only gain two more trains, on just one route, into each city • HS2 will not provide additional capacity for freight • Disruption caused by 51 alternative would not be comparable with upgrade of WCML • HS2 delivers no benefits to ECML and MML until 2033 at the earliest Page 3 of 9 HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing 2. Introduction The West Coast Main Line is the least crowded main line to London, and, unlike many other routes, its capacity can be significantly increased by lengthening and reconfiguring the trains, at a fraction of the cost of HS2.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T
    Written evidence from the Rail Delivery Group (ROR 01) 1. This is the response of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) to the Transport Select Committee’s call for evidence on the reform of the railways. 2. The RDG welcomes the Government’s support for the RDG contained in the Command Paper ‘Reforming our Railways: Putting the Customer First’, which was published today. The Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to provide leadership to the industry and to respond to the Government’s strategic challenges. The Command Paper lays out the Government’s vision for an expanding and efficient railway that meets the needs of passengers, freight users and taxpayers. The Government sees the Rail Delivery Group leading the industry in driving up efficiency and demand for the railway. This is a challenge that the Group accepts. 3. The Command Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to lead the rail industry in working together to deliver a more efficient, more affordable railway. The Rail Delivery Group is pleased that the Government has recognised that the Group is taking and shaping the industry’s agenda for a sustained programme of improved management and running of the rail network. 4. The Command Paper lists the six priority areas being addressed by the Group • Asset, programme and supply chain management; • Contractual and regulatory reform; • Technology, innovation and working practices; • Train utilisation; • A whole-system approach; and • Industry planning 5. The Rail Delivery Group was created to unlock efficiencies that will improve Britain’s railways. In its first nine months the Group has identified opportunities for a range of savings, for example in asset management through earlier involvement of the operators in planning work on the network.
    [Show full text]