HS2AA RAIL CAPACITY BRIEFING

Why HS2 is not needed to solve capacity issues on UK’s railways

9TH September 2013

For more information please contact: Richard Houghton T: 07803 178 037 E: [email protected]

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

Contents Page 1. Summary 3

2. Introduction 4

3. Capacity arguments for HS2 fundamentally flawed 4

4. Future Demand 5

5. Scope to Upgrade WCML 6

6. Euston commuter capacity 7

7. Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds 8

8. Freight Capacity 8

9. Disruption 8

10. Capacity on other routes 9

Page 2 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

1. Summary • WCML will not be full by the mid 2020. figures shows that, expect for HS1, it is the least crowded main line into and out of London • Future demand on WCML will only come from growth in total transport market as switch from road and air has already happened post upgrade • Nationally number of rail journeys fell in the first quarter of 2013 • Commuter capacity issues into Euston can be solved immediately at no cost by allowing commuters to use Virgin trains • Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds will only gain two more trains, on just one route, into each city • HS2 will not provide additional capacity for freight • Disruption caused by 51 alternative would not be comparable with upgrade of WCML • HS2 delivers no benefits to ECML and MML until 2033 at the earliest

Page 3 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

2. Introduction The is the least crowded main line to London, and, unlike many other routes, its capacity can be significantly increased by lengthening and reconfiguring the trains, at a fraction of the cost of HS2.

An Alternative Investment Strategy would provide £43bn for investment in infrastructure across all regions of the country, delivering much greater economic growth, jobs and connectivity than HS2, and far more quickly.

First Group was clear on the spare capacity on the WCML

3. The capacity arguments for HS2 are fundamentally flawed Ministers are constantly quoting Network Rail as saying that “the West Coast Main Line will be full by the mid 2020s” but there has been no objective, independent review of this. Even on Network Rail’s own evidence1, the West Coast Main Line is, except for HS1, the least crowded main line into and out of London:

Morning peak demand and capacity [Network Rail London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy July 2011]

Service group (long distance services into London) Load factor (3 hour morning peak - 2010) Paddington (Main Line and other fast trains) 99% Waterloo (South West Main Line) 91% St.Pancras () 80% Liverpool Street (Great Eastern Main Line) 78% Victoria (fast trains via East Croydon) 72% Kings Cross (ECML long distance) 65% Euston (long distance) 60% St.Pancras (HS1 domestic) 41%

14

There is lots of other evidence that West Coast Main Line services are generally nowhere near full. The average loading of Virgin Trains services in 2012/13 was 1642, much lower than for the (224), but the majority of trains on the route now have 589 seats, giving a “load factor” of 28% - in contrast, airline load factors are typically 80-90%. And routes such as the main lines into Waterloo, Victoria and Liverpool Street and key commuter routes into cities such as Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds are full now – and in many cases the Government has no long term plans to provide extra capacity.

1 London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy July 2011 (page 55) http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/rus%20documents/route%20utilisation%20strategies/r us%20generation%202/london%20and%20south%20east/london%20and%20south%20east%20route%20utilis ation%20strategy.pdf 2 Derived from Office of Rail Regulation statistics http://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/browsereports/9

Page 4 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

The Department of Transport has repeatedly refused to provide data on train loadings for Virgin Trains on the extraordinary grounds of “commercial confidentiality”, even though rail franchises are major government contracts, and there is an obvious public interest in knowing what is being delivered for the taxpayer.

However, some data was released to the High Court as part of the Judicial Review case in December 2012. This data showed that evening peak InterCity departures from Euston in 2011 carried on average just 229, a load factor of only 52.2%.

Furthermore, the 2011 counts were carried out before the programme to lengthen 35 out of 56 Pendolinos from 9 to 11 cars was implemented. This project provided a further 150 standard class seats in each lengthened set. Assuming 20 out of the 29 Pendolinos leaving Euston in the evening peak are now 11 car sets, the standard class load factor drops to 45.8% - peak passengers from other London terminals would think this was commuter heaven.

Standard class on the 0820 Euston – Manchester 12/8/13 – this is a peak morning business train with 589 seats, but carried only 18 first class and 70 standard class passengers

4. Future demand Passenger numbers on the West Coast Main Line grew dramatically after the upgrade of the route was completed in 2008. This isn’t surprising, as frequencies were improved and journey times were slashed. Taking London – Manchester as an example, previously there had been just one train an hour, taking 2 hours 40 minutes, but there is now a train every twenty minutes, taking 2 hours 8 minutes. So there has been a massive switch from air to rail, with almost everyone travelling to now going by train – the remaining air passengers are either inter-lining, or fly because the destination airport is more convenient for them than Euston.

Page 5 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

But the results for Virgin Rail3 show that rapid growth in demand is now over:

Passenger miles growth (%) for Virgin West Coast [Source: Stagecoach Annual reports]

3

The same pattern occurred when the West Coast main Line was electrified in the 1960s – initial rapid growth, then passenger numbers plateaued for many years.

Future growth on the West Coast Main Line is now only likely to come from growth in the total transport market, rather than transfer for road and air, which has already happened. But rail is already dominant for travel to central London, and the Department for Transport’s own statistics show that business travel in declining, almost certainly because businesses are increasingly using IT as a smart, cost effective alternative.

And there are real signs that the growth in rail passenger numbers is stopping nationally – rail journeys for the last reported quarter (January – March 2013) have fallen year on year, by 1.3%4 – shouldn’t the Government make sure it understands what’s happening in the real world rather than just projecting growth going on for ever in a straight line?

5. Scope to upgrade capacity on the West Coast Main Line InterCity capacity The Department for Transport (DfT) forecast 102% “background growth” in long distance demand over the 2008 base in its 2011 consultation documentation. From recent trends, this looks highly unlikely. But even if rail growth does continue, there are much cheaper and quicker ways on increasing long distance capacity on the West Coast Main Line.

3 Data from Stagecoach annual reports – Stagecoach own 50% of Virgin Rail 4 Office of Rail Regulation – Passenger journeys by sector http://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/displayreport/report/html/22c71959-3f97-405f-8342-e4981745d08b

Page 6 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

The alternative developed by 51m5, the group of local authorities opposed to HS2, achieves a major increase in capacity by:

• Changing one first class vehicle to standard (this would still leave three first class coaches in each train). • Lengthening trains from the present 9/11 cars to 12 cars (except for Liverpool trains which would stay at 11 cars because of physical constraints at Liverpool Lime Street).

This approach gives 693 seats on most trains – more than three times the average evening peak loading today

And eliminating three “pinchpoints” between Euston and Crewe would allow an extra 15 InterCity trains in each direction daily, as well as increasing freight capacity by separating InterCity and freight trains throughout.

Buried within the documentation issued by the Government in January 2012 are reports commissioned by DfT from both Network Rail6 and WS Atkins7. While the Network Rail report was clearly intended to “rubbish” the 51m Alternative, it implicitly acknowledges that capacity calculations set out in the alternative are practical and deliverable; the WS Atkins report shows that the alternative has a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of 5.1, compared with 1.4 for HS2 – and the capital cost of the 51m Alternative is £2bn, a fraction of the cost of HS2.

6. Euston commuter capacity There is a major crowding problem today on the fast commuter trains to Milton Keynes and Northampton. Indeed, the DfT have stated that one of the ten most overcrowded trains in the country last year was on this route. However, this could be solved immediately and at no cost by allowing Milton Keynes commuters to use the eight Virgin trains which stop at Milton Keynes in the evening peak period, but only to pick up.

These trains have an average load factor of just 43%, with 1992 empty seats. In the medium to longer term, the 51m alternative would double the fast peak commuter capacity on the route by building a new flyover south of Milton Keynes and introducing faster rolling stock, and this could be done in five years. HS2 would provide no additional capacity until 2026 at the earliest.

Major increases to capacity on the shorter distance commuter services on the route (e.g. to Watford and Hemel Hempstead) can be achieved by increasing all trains to 12 cars, and operation of additional commuter trains by changing stopping patterns and transferring a small number of freight trains to run outside peak periods. But HS2 doesn’t help shorter distance commuters, as these trains would still have to operate on the “slow lines” as DfT’s plans for the route show that the “fast lines” would still be very busy with fast (125/110 mph) after HS2 is built.

5 Optimised Alternative to HS2: the scope for growth on the existing network” http://51m.co.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/App%201%20-%20Optimised%20Alternative%20to%20HS2.pdf 6 Network Rail review of strategic alternatives November 2011 http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2- review-of-strategic-alternatives/hs2-review-of-strategic-alternatives.pdf

7 Atkins strategic alternatives update January 2012 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/3664/hs2-strategic- alternatives-study-update.pdf (page 28)

Page 7 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing

7. Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds The Government is arguing that HS2 is essential to enable rail to meet growing commuter demand in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. In reality, HS2 will only have a marginal benefit in each case. Taking the morning peak as an example, only two trains from London arrive at each of Manchester and Leeds before 9am today, so HS2 would only release capacity for just two more trains, on just one route into each city. So, HS2 provides minimal benefit for Leeds and Manchester commuters despite its £50 billion price tag.

It would be far better to invest £2-3bn in each city region to deliver a comprehensive increase in capacity for all routes into the city centre.

8. Freight capacity HS2 will not provide useful additional capacity for freight trains. • The “fast lines” on the key four track section of the route between London and Rugby will still be very busy with fast (125/100 mph) passenger trains serving stations such as Milton Keynes, Rugby, Coventry, Tamworth, Lichfield, Stoke-on-Trent, and Macclesfield, none of which will directly benefit from HS2. In addition, there will still be services to Chester and North Wales, as well as hourly trains on the existing route to Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester, and Glasgow. So there is no realistic possibility of 60-75 mph freight trains transferring to the “fast lines” – this would be the equivalent of heavy lorries using the fast lane on the M1.

• North of Lichfield, freight trains already have to share tracks with fast InterCity passenger trains on the majority of the route all the way to Scotland. HS2 will make this worse, again because of the differences in speed between freight and high speed trains. Far from providing extra capacity for freight, the additional fast trains on the route, including two trains an hour to Edinburgh carrying passengers transferred from the East Coast Main Line, are likely to result in little or no capacity to run any day-time freight trains between Preston and Glasgow

In contrast, the 51m alternative eliminates the remaining bottlenecks on the route south of Nuneaton and in the Stafford area where freight and InterCity trains have to use the same tracks. These small scale enhancements would separate freight and InterCity trains all the way from London to Crewe, providing genuine additional freight capacity and speeding up transit times.

9. Disruption Supporters of HS2 have constantly argued that the 51m Alternative will cause major disruption because of the infrastructure work required. This simply isn’t true – work is only required at three locations (Ledburn Junction south of Milton Keynes, Brinklow – Nuneaton, and Colwich junction south of Stafford), and this is comparable to the work being carried out on the route at present, for example the recently completed flyover at Nuneaton, Bletchley remodelling, and the new flyover at Norton Bridge. The scale of work proposed is not in any way comparable to the previous West Coast upgrade, which involved comprehensive renewal of the route.

In contrast, HS2 construction work will be very disruptive at Euston, with a permanent reduction in the number of approach tracks (from 6 to 4) and platforms (from 18 to 13/14) at an early stage of the construction programme, almost inevitably resulting in a permanent reduction in peak services. This will also impact on the Scottish sleeper services, which will no longer be able to stand at Euston after arrival in the morning, enabling passengers to remain on the train until 0800, even

Page 8 of 9

HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing for the 0647 arrival; it is quite likely that these trains will have to be permanently transferred to another terminal.

Even away from London, HS2 will require works that will cause as much disruption to exiting services as the 51m Alternative, with construction of new grade separated junctions near Lichfield, south of Crewe and south of Wigan

10. Capacity on other routes HS2 delivers no benefits for the East Coast Main Line or the Midland Main Line until Stage 2 is completed in 2033 at the earliest – at least twenty years away - and the cost of HS2 will inevitably squeeze investment on all other parts of the rail network. Sensible incremental improvements in capacity and reductions in journey times could be delivered within five to ten years across the network delivering national benefits, at much less cost.

Page 9 of 9