DOCSLIB.ORG

Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T Written evidence from the Rail Delivery Group (ROR 01) 1. This is the response of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) to the Transport Select Committee’s call for evidence on the reform of the railways. 2. The RDG welcomes the Government’s support for the RDG contained in the Command Paper ‘Reforming our Railways: Putting the Customer First’, which was published today. The Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to provide leadership to the industry and to respond to the Government’s strategic challenges. The Command Paper lays out the Government’s vision for an expanding and efficient railway that meets the needs of passengers, freight users and taxpayers. The Government sees the Rail Delivery Group leading the industry in driving up efficiency and demand for the railway. This is a challenge that the Group accepts. 3. The Command Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to lead the rail industry in working together to deliver a more efficient, more affordable railway. The Rail Delivery Group is pleased that the Government has recognised that the Group is taking and shaping the industry’s agenda for a sustained programme of improved management and running of the rail network. 4. The Command Paper lists the six priority areas being addressed by the Group • Asset, programme and supply chain management; • Contractual and regulatory reform; • Technology, innovation and working practices; • Train utilisation; • A whole-system approach; and • Industry planning 5. The Rail Delivery Group was created to unlock efficiencies that will improve Britain’s railways. In its first nine months the Group has identified opportunities for a range of savings, for example in asset management through earlier involvement of the operators in planning work on the network. The RDG has also identified efficiencies in major project implementation by involving operators in the early specification 6. The Rail Delivery Group shares the Government’s desire for an affordable and efficient railway. In bringing the industry together the Rail Delivery Group will provide the leadership to capture efficiency opportunities and ensure that the railways have earned their licence to grow. 7. The Rail Delivery Group brings together the owners of Britain's Train Operating Companies, Freight Operating Companies and Network Rail to provide leadership to Britain's rail industry. The Group was set up in May 2011 in response to the call by the Rail Value for Money Study, chaired by Sir Roy McNulty, for the rail industry to demonstrate leadership 8. The Rail Delivery Group is focusing on the recommendations contained in the Rail Value for Money Study for reducing the costs and improving the efficiency of Britain's railways. It is concentrating on industry-wide issues in the context of the need for improved services to rail users and value for money for taxpayers. 9. The priorities being pursued by the Rail Delivery Group are • Improving the asset, programme and supply-chain management of the rail industry through closer co-operation between Network Rail, operators and suppliers; • Encouraging contractual and regulatory reform that increases flexibility and allows the industry to respond to the needs of users and taxpayers; • Embracing technology and innovation in the working environment to enhance the contribution made by one of the industry’s key assets, its workforce; • Identifying ways to improve the utilisation of the train fleet by reviewing demand management, service specification and operating practices; • Achieving a quicker implementation of major technical projects by removing blockages and resolving commercial issues through taking a whole system approach; and • Making a full contribution to rail industry planning by guiding the production of the industry’s Strategic Business Plan in response to the High Level Output Specification. 10. RDG members are representatives from the owning groups of the passenger and freight train operators and Network Rail. The Chairman is Tim O’Toole, Chief Executive of First Group, the vice Chairman is Sir David Higgins, Chief Executive of Network Rail and the Secretary is Graham Smith. A list of the Member companies and representatives is attached at Appendix A 11. The Terms of Reference of the Rail Delivery Group are published on its website and an extract is attached at Appendix B April 2012 Appendix B Membership of the Rail Delivery Group Membership Abellio Anton Valk Dominic Booth (alternate) Arriva David Martin Bob Holland (alternate) DB Schenker Alain Thauvette Nigel Jones (alternate) Directly Operated Railways Doug Sutherland First Group Tim O’Toole Vernon Barker (alternate) Freightliner Peter Maybury Lindsay Durham (alternate) Go-Ahead David Brown Charles Horton (alternate) National Express Dean Finch Andrew Chivers (alternate) Network Rail Sir David Higgins Paul Plummer Stagecoach Martin Griffiths Sir Brian Souter (alternate) Virgin Tony Collins Patrick McCall (alternate) Secretary Graham Smith ATOC Michael Roberts The website of the Rail Delivery Group is www.raildeliverygroup.org The Rail Delivery Group can be contacted at [email protected] Appendix B Extract from the Terms of Reference (established in June 2011) of the Rail Delivery Group RDG will focus on industry-wide issues in the context of the need for improved service to rail users and value for money to the taxpayer. RDG will not duplicate or over-ride the primary accountability for delivery in the UK rail industry (which remains with the passenger and freight train operators and Network Rail) or the need for much stronger collaboration between these companies at a local level. RDG will co-ordinate the objectives for key cross-industry groups including National Task Force (NTF), Planning Oversight Group (POG) and Technical Strategy Leadership Group (TSLG). A key initial priority for RDG will be to review and sponsor cross-industry work by POG in preparation for the Initial Industry Plan (IIP) which [was] published in September 2011 including the scope for improvements in Value for Money and overall industry costs. RDG members will be representatives from the owning groups of the passenger and freight train operators and Network Rail. RDG attendees will be nominated Chief Executives or Board Directors from each of these groups - alternates will not be accepted without prior agreement of the members. The Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) will attend the meetings but will not be a member of the Group Support for RDG will be provided by the Members and by the cross industry groups which RDG steers. The Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC), the Rail Freight Operators’ Association (RFOA) and the Railway Industry Association (RIA) would also provide support to the cross-industry groups and provide input to RDG as appropriate. The Chairmanship and vice-Chairmanship of RDG will be from the group’s membership and would rotate on an annual basis. The initial Chairman of the Group will be Tim O’Toole and the initial vice-Chairman will be David Higgins. The role of the Chairman will be to chair meetings of the group, establish its agenda and represent the views of the group as appropriate. The role of the vice-Chairman will be to deputise for the Chairman when necessary and to represent the views of the group as appropriate. A part time Secretary will be appointed potentially on secondment from one of the industry members. The initial Secretary will be Graham Smith. The role of the Secretary will be to coordinate support required by the group and transmit its views to cross-industry groups about their objectives and priorities, making use of resources from member organisations as appropriate. Government and ORR will not be members of RDG but they will be invited to provide input to the group on key issues as appropriate and representatives from RDG will engage periodically with Ministers on key cross-industry issues or on progress with industry reform. It is recognised that the suppliers to those with a primary accountability for delivery as well as trade unions have a critical role to play and RDG will consider further how their input can be formalised. Written evidence from Angel Trains Ltd (ROR 02) Angel Trains Ltd owns, leases and maintains trains for Train Operating Companies. We are the largest Rolling Stock Operating Company (ROSCO) in the country and make a significant contribution to the UK economy. Angel Trains Ltd owns and maintains more than 4,450 passenger vehicles and 280 freight locomotives in the UK, about 37% of the nation’s rolling stock. Its customers include all 19 franchised train operating companies (TOCs) and two open access operators. Since 1996 we have invested over £3.5 billion in new trains and the refurbishment of existing trains, and are one of the largest private investors in UK Rail. Our workforce consists of over 100 individuals who are specialists in many aspects of train leasing, from finance and engineering to commercial and customer service. From our offices in London and Derby, Angel Trains Ltd provides expertise in the procurement of maintenance for our leased trains and know-how on the purchase of new rolling stock. In addition to our own resources, we have a network of suppliers and contractors, from large companies through to specialist SMEs, who are sustained by the work we generate for them. Every year we channel over £60m through our supply chain. One of the roles of the ROSCO is to act as a conduit between the international capital markets and the UK rail industry. The ability to secure financing against a diverse portfolio of assets also offers Angel Trains Ltd, and other ROSCOs, a significant degree of choice in determining the optimal sources of finance to arrive at the most cost effective solution for the industry. More information about our company is available on our website: www.angeltrains.co.uk Question - What should be the Government’s vision for the railways in 2020, taking account of likely spending constraints? Figures released last year by the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) show that passengers are increasingly choosing to travel between Britain's major cities by railway.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taking Britain Further Heathrow’S Plan for Connecting the UK to Growth
    VOLUME 1 Taking Britain further Heathrow’s plan for connecting the UK to growth #BritainsHeathrow Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited solely in response to an invitation from the Airports Commission. It should not be used for any other purpose or in any other context and Heathrow Airport Limited accepts no responsibility for its use in that regard Contents Volume 1 - Technical submission Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 11 Connecting for growth ................................................................................................................... 12 Listening to what our stakeholders say ........................................................................................... 18 Our vision for a world-class hub airport ........................................................................................... 20 Connecting all of the UK ................................................................................................................ 24 Building a sustainable Heathrow ..................................................................................................... 29 The deliverable solution .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point
    www.pwc.co.uk Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) Prepared for Rail Delivery Group (RDG) and Cancellation November 2017 Minutes (CMs) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Context 3 2 Methodology 4 2.1 General approach 4 2.2 Principles for recalibrating MPWs and CMs 4 2.3 MPWs 8 2.4 CMs 9 3 Modelling 12 3.1 Process 12 3.2 Data sources and data cleansing 12 TOC engagement 12 MOIRA 12 PEARS 12 TOC specific data 13 3.3 Modelling MPWs 13 3.4 Modelling CMs 13 3.5 Model Review 14 Appendix 1 15 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Context The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is currently in the process of reviewing the access charges and related matters for Network Rail for Control Period 6 (CP6), which runs from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2024. As part of this review, the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) is leading the recalibration of Schedule 8, the performance regime which compensates train operators for the impact of unplanned service disruption. RDG commissioned PwC to undertake Phase 1 of the review, which focused on two key parameters used in the Schedule 8 performance regime1: Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) A Monitoring Point is a point on the network (almost always a station) at which the lateness of trains in a Service Code within a Service Group in a given direction (forward/reverse) is measured. MPWs are calculated for each Monitoring Point. They reflect the proportion of a Service Group’s passengers alighting and interchanging at that Monitoring Point and any preceding stations which are not captured by a Monitoring Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States
    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
    [Show full text]
  • Heathrow Economics Study Expansion of Heathrow Airport
    Heathrow Economics Study Expansion of Heathrow airport GLA September 2006 Heathrow Economics Study Expansion of Heathrow airport Heathrow Economics Study Expansion of Heathrow airport Contents Page FOREWORD I SUMMARY II Background ii Methodology ii Main Findings ii 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Objective of the study 3 1.3 Methodology 4 1.4 Structure of report 4 2. TRANSPORT COSTS AND BENEFITS 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 General Assumptions 5 2.3 Passenger Demand Forecasts 7 2.4 Capacity Constraint 8 2.5 Benefits 10 2.6 Costs 12 2.7 Government Revenue 12 2.8 Conclusions 13 3. WIDER ECONOMIC BENEFITS 14 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Employment and regeneration 14 3.3 Agglomeration (Productivity and Business) 15 3.4 Tourism 15 3.5 Conclusion 15 4. EFFECTS ON THE SCALE OF CAPACITY REQUIRED 17 4.1 Introduction 17 4.2 Transport appraisal 17 4.3 Making more efficient use of existing capacity 17 4.4 Conclusion 20 5. EFFECTS ON THE CHOICE OF LOCATION 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 Transport benefits 21 5.3 Environmental issues 22 5.4 The need for a transport hub 22 5.5 Conclusion 23 6. IMPACT ON THE AVIATION INDUSTRY AND REGIONS 24 6.1 Introduction 24 6.2 The impact of a third runway at Heathrow compared to an additional runway elsewhere in the South East 24 6.3 The impact of providing additional capacity in the South East compared to constrained capacity 24 Heathrow Economics Study Expansion of Heathrow airport 6.4 Conclusion 25 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabeth Line
    COMPLETING ELIZABETH LINE THE ELIZABETH LINE Trial Running Update TRIAL RUNNING Plumstead Sidings PROJECT UPDATE WHAT IS TRIAL RUNNING? Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its Throughout the Trial Running programme Crossrail will Trial Running marks the point at which the Railways and complex final stages. Crossrail and Transport steadily increase the numbers of trains running in the tunnels. Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 This will then be further increased and will allow the railway (ROGS) apply for the first time in the Central Operating for London (TfL) are working to ensure the and the supporting systems to be operated as close as Section. Crossrail transitions from following the construction earliest possible opening for the Elizabeth line. possible to an operational timetable. regulations to following Rail regulations. The project is nearing the next important milestone and There is important work to be done but we will take the time Following a readiness review, we will sign over control of the expects to commence extensive commissioning of the railway needed to get it right. Our top priority is a safe railway which central operating section to TfL as infrastructure manager as in spring 2021. This is a crucial moment in the project with the London and the UK can rely on. we transition to ROGS and operate under the Railway Rule railway on track to open in the first half of 2022. Book. From that moment forward, TfL’s service and The progress we have seen over recent months highlights the infrastructure managers will be accountable for the safety, The next phase, Trial Running, involves integrated trials of clear path we have towards completing the Elizabeth line and operation and maintenance of the railway, and the Trial the railway to demonstrate that the Elizabeth line is safe and commencing passenger services in the first half of 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme
    LANCASHIRE HISTORIC TOWN SURVEY PROGRAMME BURNLEY HISTORIC TOWN ASSESSMENT REPORT MAY 2005 Lancashire County Council and Egerton Lea Consultancy with the support of English Heritage and Burnley Borough Council Lancashire Historic Town Survey Burnley The Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme was carried out between 2000 and 2006 by Lancashire County Council and Egerton Lea Consultancy with the support of English Heritage. This document has been prepared by Lesley Mitchell and Suzanne Hartley of the Lancashire County Archaeology Service, and is based on an original report written by Richard Newman and Caron Newman, who undertook the documentary research and field study. The illustrations were prepared and processed by Caron Newman, Lesley Mitchell, Suzanne Hartley, Nik Bruce and Peter Iles. Copyright © Lancashire County Council 2005 Contact: Lancashire County Archaeology Service Environment Directorate Lancashire County Council Guild House Cross Street Preston PR1 8RD Mapping in this volume is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Lancashire County Council Licence No. 100023320 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lancashire County Council would like to acknowledge the advice and assistance provided by Graham Fairclough, Jennie Stopford, Andrew Davison, Roger Thomas, Judith Nelson and Darren Ratcliffe at English Heritage, Paul Mason, John Trippier, and all the staff at Lancashire County Council, in particular Nik Bruce, Jenny Hayward, Jo Clark, Peter Iles, Peter McCrone and Lynda Sutton. Egerton Lea Consultancy Ltd wishes to thank the staff of the Lancashire Record Office, particularly Sue Goodwin, for all their assistance during the course of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Norwich Direct Train
    London To Norwich Direct Train Kristos gurgles her incautiousness frontally, dree and patchier. Nightmarish Adnan usually calibrate some lurkers or sleet jawbreakingly. Weighted Stillman bade ministerially or bales harmonically when Wyatan is rhotic. East anglia is direct, there are implemented and can travel entry to change or parks on this car, no direct train to london norwich. How to Travel From London to Norwich by Train Bus TripSavvy. National Express runs a regular bus service between London Victoria Coach now and the Norwich Bus Station which leaves London at. Bus from London to Norwich Find schedules Compare prices Book Megabus National Express and National Express tickets. The cheapest train connections from London to Norwich. When creating an average northern advanced fare. Norwich is also elm hill and table service is definitely worth trying when it from your train to yorkshire and make significant damage to alcohol, london to norwich direct train! Click on a gift card pin. What is Norwich like about visit? Get cheap train tickets to Norwich with our split up search. The direct from london st pancras international partners sites selected are as nationalrail and direct train tickets between london liverpool street every kind of. Our London Sidcup Hotel is Located between London and Kent and just 100m from the Train them Free Wi-Fi Throughout Your content Book Direct. How it is regarded as a colourful excursion to norwich here when we cannot wait to ironically for all! Connect to new azuma trains from time limit fuel facility supplies renewable compressed natural habitats, so just under a button down.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan London Borough Of
    SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAIN LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD FINAL DRAFT v2.0 Quality Management Quality Management DOCUMENT INFORMATION Title: Surface Water Management Plan for London Borough of Enfield Owner: Ian Russell Version: v3.0 Status: Final Project Number: CS/046913 File Name: DLT2_GP4_Enfield_SWMP Final_V3.0 REVISION HISTORY Date of Summary of Changes Completed By Version Issue Initial draft SI 12/06/2011 1.0 Final Draft SI 01/08/2011 2.0 Final IR 05/01/2012 3.0 AUTHOR Name Organisation and Role Stephanie Ip Senior Consultant, Capita Symonds Ruth Farrar Consultant, Capita Symonds APPROVALS Name Title Signature Date Ruth Goodall Director, Capita Symonds Principal Consultant, Capita Michael Arthur Symonds Ian Russell Senior Engineer, LB Enfield Kevin Reid Programme Manager DISTRIBUTION Name Organisation and Role Ian Russell Senior Engineer, LB Enfield Kevin Reid Programme Manager, GLA RELATED DOCUMENTS Date of Doc Ref Document Title Author Version Issue i Acknowledgements Acknowledgements A number of people and organisations outside Enfield Council have contributed to this Surface Water Management Plan. Their assistance is greatly appreciated, and in particularly inputs and information provided by: • The British Geological Survey • British Waterways • Drain London Group 4 boroughs: o London Borough of Haringey o London Borough of Hackney o London Borough of Waltham Forest o London Borough of Newham o London Borough of Tower Hamlets • The Environment Agency • The Greater London Authority • London Councils • The London Fire Brigade • Network Rail • Thames Water • Transport for London and London Underground ii Executive Summary Executive Summary This document forms the Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) for the London Borough (LB) of Enfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley Barracks S
    ’S HISTORICAL COMM HIRE UNI AS TY NC STA LA TI ST ON EA BURNLEY BARRACKS S BURNLEY BARRACKS STATION Burnley Westgate station was built and opened by the East Lancashire Railway Company on the 18th September 1848. It opened as the terminus for the East Lancashire Railway Companies trains from Accrington. The engineers in charge of building the line from Accrington to Burnley and onwards to Colne were Mr J.S. Perring and Mr J.A. Donaldson. The following year with the imposing stone Burnley viaduct completed the Colne extension was opened on 1st February 1849. Burnley Westgate closed on this date and the larger Burnley Barracks Station - photo courtesy LYRS Burnley Bank Top station came into use. The area around the former Burnley Westgate station however developed quickly with housing, mills and a cavalry barracks. The demand for the station to re open was quickly acted on by the railway company and the station re opened in September 1851 with a new name, Burnley Barracks, refl ecting the close proximity of the cavalry barracks. The 1881 census fi gures show that seventy six soldiers were based at the barracks and only three of them were from Burnley so soldiers would travel from far and wide to the barracks using the station. The station was listed Burnley Barracks Station - photo courtesy LYRS as dealing with passenger trains only, goods were dealt with at Rose Grove or Burnley Bank Top the adjacent stations. The station is close to the Leeds Liverpool canal which can be used to access the new Padiham Greenway.
    [Show full text]
  • Avelia Pendolino Sheet Single Deck Hst
    HIGH SPEED TRAINS PRODUCT AVELIA PENDOLINO SHEET SINGLE DECK HST Pendolino, designed for high-speed lines as well as for conventional networks, provides great flexibility, smooth cross-border operations and enhanced passenger comfort. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Avelia Pendolino is part of the Avelia range, based on proven technology used in more than 1,450 high-speed trains in service worldwide. The train is designed to run at up to 250 km/h and optimized for both conventional lines and high-speed lines. Its distributed traction offers a great flexibility, in terms of length and number of cars. Pendolino can be equipped with Tiltronix, Alstom's tilting technology, to reduce journey time on winding networks. CUSTOMER BENEFITS Great versatility Enhanced passenger experience Avelia Pendolino can be fully customized Pendolino offers flexible configurations: from interior layout to the number of cars Different ambiances, areas dedicated to (from 4 to 11), voltage power supplies, persons with reduced mobility, catering loading and track gauges. Furthermore, facilities, areas for children, dynamic Alstom’s expertise allows operators to even passenger information systems, wide plan the future evolution of their train and to corridors and gangways. Pendolino provides modernize them with minimum impact on optimum traveling experience even under operation. extreme climate conditions. It offers high- Pendolino can reach speeds of 250 km/h, on performance air conditioning, thermal KEY BENEFITS / KEY FIGURES dedicated high-speed track, with only 75% of insulation systems, winterization (up to - its available traction power and track-friendly 45°C) and protection against snow. • Alstom Avelia’s proven technology: bogies. used in 1/4 high speed trains in Truly cross-border service in the world Short-time delivery AveliaFOR trains MORE are already running in 21 • Over 400 Pendolino HST running in differentINFORMATION: countries, crossing 16 borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Competition for and in the Market Co-Exist in Terms of Delivering Cost Efficient Services? Evidence from Open Access Train O
    Transportation Research Part A 113 (2018) 114–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tra Can competition for and in the market co-exist in terms of delivering cost efficient services? Evidence from open access train T operators and their franchised counterparts in Britain ⁎ Phill Wheata, , Andrew S.J. Smitha, Torris Rasmussenb a Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK b Norwegian Railway Directorate, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper aims to inform an important policy debate in Europe on how best to open up pas- Returns to density senger rail markets to increased competition: and specifically, whether to allow open access train Competition-in-the-market operators alongside franchised (tendered) operators. The paper utilises new British data to Competition-for-the-market analyse the cost side of this debate. Our data is unique in that we have cost data by route level for both the incumbent (corresponding to British franchises) and the open access operators, as op- posed to only having cost data on the incumbent at the network level as in other countries. The open access operators are found to have comparable unit costs to franchised operators. This is unexpected considering the significant returns to density that benefit the larger franchised op- erators. This is subsequently found to be due to lower input prices and an ‘open access business model’ effect that outweigh any density disadvantages. Overall we find that there are negligible cost disadvantages of allowing open access operators to compete with franchised intercity op- erators.
    [Show full text]