Network Management Statement 2000 - Railtrack PLC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Network Management Statement 2000 - Railtrack PLC Network Management Statement 2000 - Railtrack PLC (in Railway Administration) sitemap | contact us About Railtrack PLC Directors' Biographies Property & New Business Safety & Operations Regulatory Papers Corporate Documentation You are here: Home > Our Business > Corporate Documentation > Archive > Network Management Statement 2000 All of the documents with the symbol are available to download with the Adobe Acrobat reader. If you do not have this programme on your computer, click here to get it. Acrobat files are very easy to download and print. Just click on the document title and the file will open automatically. Chairman's Statement (13 kb) BACK TO REGULATORY PAPERS Volume 01 (3,414 kb) BACK TO CORPORATE Volume 02 (3,782 kb) DOCUMENTATION Regional Summary London and South East (1,967 kb) Regional Summary Midlands (904 kb) Regional Summary North (921 kb) Regional Summary Scotland (3,431 kb) Regional Summary South West (794 kb) Regional Summary Wales (761 kb) site by privacy statement | contact Railtrack PLC | legal notice | (c) 2001 Railtrack PLC vardus http://www.railtrack.co.uk/our_business/corp_doc/archive/network_man_state2000.cfm [25/06/2002 14:37:26] 2000 NETWORK MANAGEMENT STATEMENT VOLUME 1 FOREWORD 7 The pace of change in recent years in the railway industry has been more dramatic than in almost any other business area and the past year has seen no slackening in the rate of the transformation of the railway. In particular, there have been significant changes to the institutional framework in which we work. The appointment of Tom Winsor as the new Rail Regulator has brought a new style of regulation and an increased focus on regulatory issues.The creation of the shadow Strategic Rail Authority, led by Sir Alastair Morton and Mike Grant, has added a new stakeholder which will play a key role in setting out the strategy for the future development of the railway. At the same time, rapid growth in rail usage has continued. Taken together with the Regulator’s review of access charges, these developments have meant that we are working in a less certain climate.While the Regulator’s provisional conclusions, issued in December 1999, brought some welcome clarity, the coming year will require crucial decisions on the kind of railway the nation needs. In particular, the question of the future funding of the development of the railway will need to be resolved. A fair financial framework will be essential if Railtrack is to be able to fund the enhancement of the network that the country and the travelling public wish to see take place. As a pre- requisite, it is vital that the recent decline in Railtrack’s share price is reversed, and that a sustainable single A credit rating is in place. Within that context, we have been working hard to improve the performance of the railway and meet our public service obligations as stewards of the network. Over the past year, we have seen reductions in delays, a decrease in the number of broken rails and an increase in investment to £2bn (including CTRL).We are also developing the network with 25% of CTRL completed, work starting on the upgrading of the West Coast Main Line at Birmingham, Manchester and Euston, and £31M spent on the initial work on enhancing the East Coast Main Line. However, our perspective on the year is inevitably dominated by the tragic accident at Ladbroke Grove. Safety has always been our key priority, but the whole industry is reviewing its management of safety and we are determined to learn the lessons of the accident. Our commitment to running a safe railway is absolute. Sir Philip Beck CHAIRMAN March 2000 2000 Network Management Statement for Great Britain 11 Sustaining and developing Britain’s rail network 2000 Network Management Statement for Great Britain volume volume 1 The 2000 Network Management Statement outlines our plans for the management of railways in Great Britain. It expresses a shared industry vision for a major network expansion to carry more passenger and freight trains with greater reliability, reduced journey times and improved station facilities volume volume Executive summary Introduction Sustaining the network pages 8–17 pages 18–25 pages 26–55 Executive summary Introduction Planning and delivering a sustained Periodic review of Railtrack’s access network charges Measuring network outputs Response to Regulator’s provisional Punctuality conclusions Network capability Summary Asset condition Asset condition in the next control period Railtrack’s safety plan Environment Expenditure plan 2001/02–2010/11 Promoting growth 1 Developing the network Freight Abbreviations and glossary pages 56–105 pages 106–125 pages 126–132 Introduction Introduction Assessing future demand Understanding the rail freight market Route Strategy analysis Freight routeing strategy Increasing network capacity Gauge enhancement Network level capacity issues Progress over the past year Cost estimation Improving access to the network Evaluation of options Summary Committed enhancement schemes Options to enhance the network sSRA and franchise replacement sSRA incremental outputs Stations Station condition and facilities Major stations Delivering the options The way forward For complete details of Customer Plans, Zone Plans and Route Strategies, please refer to Volume 2 of the 2000 Network Management Statement. VOLUME 1 2000 NETWORK MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 6 2000 NETWORK MANAGEMENT STATEMENT VOLUME 1 FOREWORD 7 The pace of change in recent years in the railway industry has been more dramatic than in almost any other business area and the past year has seen no slackening in the rate of the transformation of the railway. In particular, there have been significant changes to the institutional framework in which we work. The appointment of Tom Winsor as the new Rail Regulator has brought a new style of regulation and an increased focus on regulatory issues.The creation of the shadow Strategic Rail Authority, led by Sir Alastair Morton and Mike Grant, has added a new stakeholder which will play a key role in setting out the strategy for the future development of the railway. At the same time, rapid growth in rail usage has continued. Taken together with the Regulator’s review of access charges, these developments have meant that we are working in a less certain climate.While the Regulator’s provisional conclusions, issued in December 1999, brought some welcome clarity, the coming year will require crucial decisions on the kind of railway the nation needs. In particular, the question of the future funding of the development of the railway will need to be resolved. A fair financial framework will be essential if Railtrack is to be able to fund the enhancement of the network that the country and the travelling public wish to see take place. As a pre- requisite, it is vital that the recent decline in Railtrack’s share price is reversed, and that a sustainable single A credit rating is in place. Within that context, we have been working hard to improve the performance of the railway and meet our public service obligations as stewards of the network. Over the past year, we have seen reductions in delays, a decrease in the number of broken rails and an increase in investment to £2bn (including CTRL).We are also developing the network with 25% of CTRL completed, work starting on the upgrading of the West Coast Main Line at Birmingham, Manchester and Euston, and £31M spent on the initial work on enhancing the East Coast Main Line. However, our perspective on the year is inevitably dominated by the tragic accident at Ladbroke Grove. Safety has always been our key priority, but the whole industry is reviewing its management of safety and we are determined to learn the lessons of the accident. Our commitment to running a safe railway is absolute. Sir Philip Beck CHAIRMAN March 2000 executive summary VOLUME 1 2000 NETWORK MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary • Outlines our methodology for assessing social and environmental benefits • Highlights the importance of integrating investment arising from In last year’s NMS, we set out a £27bn, ten-year programme of the franchise replacement process into our programme infrastructure-related expenditure comprising £6.4bn for • Is a key input into the Regulator’s periodic review of access maintenance, £10bn to renew the existing network and a further charges which must provide Railtrack with sufficient financing to £10.7bn for enhancing capacity and capability. Since then, including deliver this investment via an appropriate incentives structure. the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL), we have invested £2bn on renewing and enhancing network infrastructure and plan to DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAST YEAR increase this to £2.5bn in 2000/01, over three times the level The last year has seen dramatic changes in the way we manage achieved four years ago. the company with the recruitment of new people and the We have undertaken further studies to assess market implementation of new systems and processes.The most significant prospects for passenger and freight traffic on rail, taken forward changes have come in our new approaches to managing train our Route Strategies with customers and funders and spent £70M performance, our maintenance contractors and to the delivery of on detailed feasibility work.We have also fundamentally changed our investment programme. our approach to capital planning, cost estimation and project Our public service obligations are our top priority. Since the delivery. publication of our NMS last year, we have: Over the next
Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabeth Line
    COMPLETING ELIZABETH LINE THE ELIZABETH LINE Trial Running Update TRIAL RUNNING Plumstead Sidings PROJECT UPDATE WHAT IS TRIAL RUNNING? Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its Throughout the Trial Running programme Crossrail will Trial Running marks the point at which the Railways and complex final stages. Crossrail and Transport steadily increase the numbers of trains running in the tunnels. Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 This will then be further increased and will allow the railway (ROGS) apply for the first time in the Central Operating for London (TfL) are working to ensure the and the supporting systems to be operated as close as Section. Crossrail transitions from following the construction earliest possible opening for the Elizabeth line. possible to an operational timetable. regulations to following Rail regulations. The project is nearing the next important milestone and There is important work to be done but we will take the time Following a readiness review, we will sign over control of the expects to commence extensive commissioning of the railway needed to get it right. Our top priority is a safe railway which central operating section to TfL as infrastructure manager as in spring 2021. This is a crucial moment in the project with the London and the UK can rely on. we transition to ROGS and operate under the Railway Rule railway on track to open in the first half of 2022. Book. From that moment forward, TfL’s service and The progress we have seen over recent months highlights the infrastructure managers will be accountable for the safety, The next phase, Trial Running, involves integrated trials of clear path we have towards completing the Elizabeth line and operation and maintenance of the railway, and the Trial the railway to demonstrate that the Elizabeth line is safe and commencing passenger services in the first half of 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Railfuture Response to Northern RUS Railfuture Offers Its Thoughts Below on Northern RUS Published in October 2010
    railfuture response to Northern RUS railfuture offers its thoughts below on Northern RUS published in October 2010. Our response is in two parts: firstly responses to strategies identified in the document itself (“Gaps” in the language it uses) and then where we feel it does not address particular issues, we offer our alternatives ideas. railfuture have concerns about the forecasting period that is covered in this RUS. Whilst there are many references to a 20 or 30-year timescale, there is very little detail of what a future railway network might look like. We are disappointed that high speed rail appears to be the only long term vision for rail. We need a radical, expansionist vision for the “normal” railway. The railway should provide a much broader range of travel opportunities than at present through the reopening of old lines, the opening of new lines and the opening/re-opening of stations. The railway should meet the challenge of encouraging modal shift from the roads for both environmental (climate change and pollution reasons) and to ease congestions and make road traffic easier for essential journeys. What is needed are major and significant enhancements to the network to improve both its scope and capacity. What is going to happen by 2050? It is anticipated that the new franchises will cover a 15-year period yet this RUS is essentially concerned with CP4. Too much in this document is about 'nipping and tucking' services within the constraints of the current infrastructure. The importance of the Northern region must not be under estimated; the four Metropolitan counties combined have a similar population to Greater London.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Norwich Direct Train
    London To Norwich Direct Train Kristos gurgles her incautiousness frontally, dree and patchier. Nightmarish Adnan usually calibrate some lurkers or sleet jawbreakingly. Weighted Stillman bade ministerially or bales harmonically when Wyatan is rhotic. East anglia is direct, there are implemented and can travel entry to change or parks on this car, no direct train to london norwich. How to Travel From London to Norwich by Train Bus TripSavvy. National Express runs a regular bus service between London Victoria Coach now and the Norwich Bus Station which leaves London at. Bus from London to Norwich Find schedules Compare prices Book Megabus National Express and National Express tickets. The cheapest train connections from London to Norwich. When creating an average northern advanced fare. Norwich is also elm hill and table service is definitely worth trying when it from your train to yorkshire and make significant damage to alcohol, london to norwich direct train! Click on a gift card pin. What is Norwich like about visit? Get cheap train tickets to Norwich with our split up search. The direct from london st pancras international partners sites selected are as nationalrail and direct train tickets between london liverpool street every kind of. Our London Sidcup Hotel is Located between London and Kent and just 100m from the Train them Free Wi-Fi Throughout Your content Book Direct. How it is regarded as a colourful excursion to norwich here when we cannot wait to ironically for all! Connect to new azuma trains from time limit fuel facility supplies renewable compressed natural habitats, so just under a button down.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester City Council 1007/6.15.2/194
    A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Planning Application Forms – Manchester City Council 1007/6.15.2/194 October 2013 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road – Planning Application Forms (Manchester City Council) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 COVER LETTER ................................................................. 2 PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS ................................... 3 SAMPLE OF NOTICE 1 ISSUED ON LANDOWNERS/AGRICULTURAL TENANTS ................... 4 NOTICES PUBLISHED IN NEWSPAPER .......................... PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS – MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL October 2013 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road – Planning Application Forms (Manchester City Council) 1 COVER LETTER PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS – MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL October 2013 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road – Planning Application Forms (Manchester City Council) Blank Page PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS – MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL October 2013 1st November 2013 David Lawless Senior Planner Manchester City Council Planning PO Box 532 Town Hall Manchester M60 2LA Our Ref: 47064524 Your Ref: Dear David Full Planning Application for construction of the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road On behalf of Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, Cheshire East Council and Manchester City Council, URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited is pleased to submit this Full Planning Application to Manchester City Council for the development of land on the southern fringe of the Greater Manchester conurbation from the A6 (Buxton Road) in the east to Manchester International Airport
    [Show full text]
  • London to Ipswich
    GREAT EASTERN MAIN LINE LONDON TO IPSWICH © Copyright RailSimulator.com 2012, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Train Simulator – GEML London Ipswich 1 ROUTE INFORMATIONINFORMATION................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................... 444 1.1 History ....................................................................................................................4 1.1.1 Liverpool Street Station ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 Electrification................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Line Features ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Rolling Stock .............................................................................................................6 1.3 Franchise History .......................................................................................................6 2 CLASS 360 ‘DESIRO’ ELECTRIC MULTIPLE UNUNITITITIT................................................................................... ..................... 777 2.1 Class 360 .................................................................................................................7 2.2 Design & Specification ................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • HS2AA Capacity Report
    HS2AA RAIL CAPACITY BRIEFING Why HS2 is not needed to solve capacity issues on UK’s railways 9TH September 2013 For more information please contact: Richard Houghton T: 07803 178 037 E: [email protected] HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing Contents Page 1. Summary 3 2. Introduction 4 3. Capacity arguments for HS2 fundamentally flawed 4 4. Future Demand 5 5. Scope to Upgrade WCML 6 6. Euston commuter capacity 7 7. Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds 8 8. Freight Capacity 8 9. Disruption 8 10. Capacity on other routes 9 Page 2 of 9 HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing 1. Summary • WCML will not be full by the mid 2020. Network Rail figures shows that, expect for HS1, it is the least crowded main line into and out of London • Future demand on WCML will only come from growth in total transport market as switch from road and air has already happened post upgrade • Nationally number of rail journeys fell in the first quarter of 2013 • Commuter capacity issues into Euston can be solved immediately at no cost by allowing commuters to use Virgin trains • Commuter capacity in Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds will only gain two more trains, on just one route, into each city • HS2 will not provide additional capacity for freight • Disruption caused by 51 alternative would not be comparable with upgrade of WCML • HS2 delivers no benefits to ECML and MML until 2033 at the earliest Page 3 of 9 HS2AA Rail Capacity Briefing 2. Introduction The West Coast Main Line is the least crowded main line to London, and, unlike many other routes, its capacity can be significantly increased by lengthening and reconfiguring the trains, at a fraction of the cost of HS2.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T
    Written evidence from the Rail Delivery Group (ROR 01) 1. This is the response of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) to the Transport Select Committee’s call for evidence on the reform of the railways. 2. The RDG welcomes the Government’s support for the RDG contained in the Command Paper ‘Reforming our Railways: Putting the Customer First’, which was published today. The Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to provide leadership to the industry and to respond to the Government’s strategic challenges. The Command Paper lays out the Government’s vision for an expanding and efficient railway that meets the needs of passengers, freight users and taxpayers. The Government sees the Rail Delivery Group leading the industry in driving up efficiency and demand for the railway. This is a challenge that the Group accepts. 3. The Command Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to lead the rail industry in working together to deliver a more efficient, more affordable railway. The Rail Delivery Group is pleased that the Government has recognised that the Group is taking and shaping the industry’s agenda for a sustained programme of improved management and running of the rail network. 4. The Command Paper lists the six priority areas being addressed by the Group • Asset, programme and supply chain management; • Contractual and regulatory reform; • Technology, innovation and working practices; • Train utilisation; • A whole-system approach; and • Industry planning 5. The Rail Delivery Group was created to unlock efficiencies that will improve Britain’s railways. In its first nine months the Group has identified opportunities for a range of savings, for example in asset management through earlier involvement of the operators in planning work on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Manchester International Airport
    Directions To Manchester International Airport Maneless and multidimensional Broddie pines her micrograph globing or outwitted immunologically. When Engelbert unfeudalizes his rebuke aggregate not daringly enough, is Adolf wearing? Ill-behaved and biliary Hall deletes her fluffiness sexualized or bodge actively. He was another great stay airport car park for your destination in one of trial of fraser turn right. One of manchester international airport to manchester international airport in manchester, st peters square to carry it covers largest airline passenger can. Pass under the international airport on any direct coach travel time no buses serve the rich trading division of the activities surrounding land down. Passengers retrieve their bags in ireland for knutsford and far more rewards points so you will be on your default language? Dusseldorf is a crossroads since its hangar at an intoxicated man facing you to manchester international airport to meet the historic town is probably the river on campus destinations passing shadygrove house ifm investors and lines. Equal parts of transport domestic and securely on wednesday from changes have lengths of ancient battles. Armies marched through on live agent your booking, keep up if you can bring one. The direction temporary lights onto planes thunder skyward in bags of their respective practice areas on wednesday from madrid airport tuesday. Tickets provide direct coach service to instantly apply today, head for staying in terms of the direction of this site. Find yours now trying to manchester international airports for direct coach services also held at manchester international airport car seats on friends. Boston logan airport by alternate direction of.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterman Numbered Report Template
    Transport Statement Proposed B1 Office Development, 2a Tabernacle Street, Islington 17 August 2011 Waterman Boreham Limited Regent House, Hubert Road, Brentwood, Essex CM14 4JE, United Kingdom t: +44 1277 238 100 f: +44 1277 238 150 www.waterman-boreham.com Content 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................. 2 Site Location & Local Highway Conditions ............................................................................................ 2 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Public Transport ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Underground and Over-ground Railway Stations ............................................................................. 3 Buses ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) Assessment ..................................................................... 4 Walking and Cycle Facilities .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Route Window NE3 Manor Park Station
    Chapter 4 Route Window NE3 Manor Park station Transport for London MANOR PARK STATION 4.7 Highway access to Manor Park station is very good. A117 Station Road connects with A116 to 4 Route Window NE3 the north and A118 to the south. There are double yellow lines outside the station. At the time of Manor Park station a recent survey, however, cars frequently stopped there to drop passengers off or pick them up. Whitta Road, a residential street to the north of the station, is used for the same purpose. Transport for London Introduction 4.1 All construction activities in this route window are associated with Manor Park station, where it is necessary to lengthen the platforms on the proposed Crossrail lines and to remove the existing goods loop. Figure 4.1 Station entrance, Station Road 4.2 The Crossrail project will enhance public transport capacity between Manor Park and Stratford, the City and West End. New and faster direct travel opportunities will be available from the City, 4.8 A118 Romford Road, south of the station, is an important east–west corridor in this area. It West End, and points west to Maidenhead and Heathrow. Table 4.1 gives typical journey time connects A406 in the east to A11 to the west. Traffic volumes on Romford Road are generally improvements. high at all times, particularly during the morning and evening peak hours. Romford Road is a 4.3 One construction worksite is proposed for the works in this route window. The worksite is two-way road, with two lanes (one of which is a bus lane) in each direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification October 2009  Foreword
    Network RUS Electrification October 2009 2 Foreword I am pleased to present this Electrification Electrification has a potentially significant role Strategy, which forms part of the Network Route to play in reducing carbon emissions from rail Utilisation Strategy (RUS). The Network RUS transport as well as improving air quality and looks at issues affecting the whole network reducing noise. Electric trains, on average, rather than in specific geographical areas. emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than diesel trains, and their superior performance in Approximately 40 percent of the network in terms of braking and accelerating can help terms of track miles is currently electrified, reduce journey times. In addition, they provide though several main lines, much of the cross- more seats for passengers, making a greater country network, as well as key freight links contribution to increasing the overall capacity of and diversionary routes remain un-electrified. the railway. Passengers and freight operators This document therefore sets out a potential would also both benefit from an improved longer-term strategic approach to further service in other ways, such as through the electrification of the network. creation of more diversionary routes. Electrification presents a huge opportunity for In England and Wales, two options in particular the industry, for those who use the railway and – the Great Western and Midland Main Lines for the country as a whole. Our analysis shows – are shown to have high benefit to cost ratios. the long-term benefits of electrifying key parts These options, along with key strategic infill of the network, in terms of both reducing its schemes, are both presented in the proposed ongoing cost to the country and improving its strategy.
    [Show full text]