Avanti West Coast Trains Limited Consolidated TAC up to 27Th SA As

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Avanti West Coast Trains Limited Consolidated TAC up to 27Th SA As TRACK ACCESS CONTRACT (PASSENGER SERVICES) Dated 1st September 2011 Between NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED and The Secretary of State for Transport As amended by 1st Supplemental dated 16th November 2012 2nd Supplemental dated 5th December 2012 Notice to amend Schedule 1 dated 7th December 2012 3rd Supplemental dated 12th February 2013 Amendment Notice dated March 2013 5th Supplemental dated 16th December 2013 6th Supplemental dated 18th August 2013 (superseded) 7th Supplemental dated 15th October 2013 8th Supplemental dated 1st April 2014 9th Supplemental dated 22nd September 2014 10th Supplemental dated 4th December 2014 11th Supplemental dated 12th May 2015 12th Supplemental dated 24th August 2015 13th Supplemental dated 14th January 2016 14th Supplemental dated 1st April 2016 15th Supplemental dated 9th February 2016 16th Supplemental dated 6th March 2016 17th Supplemental dated 23rd December 2016 18th Supplemental dated 12th April 2016 Page 1 of 220 19th Supplemental dated 26th June 2017 21st Supplemental dated 18 April 2018 (following ORR’s letter of direction, dated 04th April 2018) 22nd Supplemental dated 04th May 2018 24th Supplemental dated 11th December 2018 26th Supplemental dated 18th March 2019 27th Supplemental dated 12th December 2019 Page 2 of 220 Contents 1 INTERPRETATION 12 1.1 Definitions 12 1.2 Interpretation 17 1.3 Indemnities 18 2. NETWORK CODE AND TRACTION ELECTRICITY RULES 18 2.1 Incorporation 18 2.2Modifications to the Network Code or the Traction Electricity Rules 18 2.3 Compliance by other operators 18 3 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT AND DURATION 18 3.1 Effective date 18 3.2 Conditions precedent to Clause 5 18 3.3 Obligations to satisfy conditions precedent to Clause 5 19 3.4Consequences of non-fulfilment of conditions precedent to Clause 5 19 3.5 Expiry 19 3.6 Suspension and termination 19 4 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE 19 4.1 General standard 19 4.2 Good faith 20 Page 3 of 220 5 PERMISSION TO USE 20 5.1 Permission to use the Routes 20 5.2 Meaning 20 5.3 Permission under Clauses 5.2(e) and 5.2(f) 20 5.4 Changes to Applicable Engineering Access Statement and Applicable Timetable Planning Rules 21 5.5 Engineering Access Statement, Timetable Planning Rules and Restrictions of Use 21 5.6 The Services and the Specified Equipment 21 5.7 Performance 21 5.8 Stabling 21 5th 5.9 Relevant Schedule 8 Modifications 21 6 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAINS AND NETWORK 21 6.1 General 21 6.2 Trespass, vandalism and animals 21 6.3 Safety 22 6.4 Use of Railway Code Systems 22 7 TRACK CHARGES AND OTHER PAYMENTS 22 8 LIABILITY 22 8.1 Performance Orders in relation to breach 22 8.2 Compensation in relation to breach 22 Page 4 of 220 9 NOT USED 23 10 LIABILITY - OTHER MATTERS 23 10.1 Train Operator indemnity 23 10.2 Network Rail indemnity 23 11 RESTRICTIONS ON CLAIMS 23 11.1 Notification and mitigation 23 11.2 Restrictions on claims by Network Rail 23 11.3 Restrictions on claims by Train Operator 24 11.4 Restriction on claims by both parties 24 11.5 Limitation on liability 25 11.6 Claims Allocation and Handling Agreement 25 12 GOVERNING LAW 25 13 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 25 1st 13.1 ADRR 25 13.2 Unpaid sums 26 1st 13.3 Performance Orders 26 1st 13.4 Remedies 27 1st 13.5 Exclusion of applications on preliminary points of law 27 14 CONFIDENTIALITY 27 14.1 Confidential Information 27 14.2 Entitlement to divulge 27 14.3 Return of Confidential Information 28 Page 5 of 220 14.4 Retention or destruction of Confidential Information 28 14.5 Ownership of Confidential Information 29 15 ASSIGNMENT AND NOVATION 29 15.1 Assignment 29 15.2 Novation 29 15.3 Novation terms 29 16 PAYMENTS, INTEREST AND VAT 30 16.1 Payment 30 16.2 Interest 30 16.3 VAT 30 17 FORCE MAJEURE EVENTS 31 17.1 Meaning of Force Majeure Event 31 17.2 Nature and extent of relief for Force Majeure 32 17.3 Entitlement to Force Majeure relief 32 17.4 Procedure for claiming relief 32 17.5 Force Majeure Notices and Reports 32 17.6 Mitigation 33 17.7 Duration of relief for force majeure 33 17.8 Availability of Performance Order 34 Page 6 of 220 18 MISCELLANEOUS 34 18.1 Non waiver 34 18.2 Variations 34 18.3 Entire contract and exclusive remedies 35 18.4 Notices 36 18.5 Counterparts 37 18.6 Survival 37 18.7 Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 37 19 TRANSITION 37 19.1 Corresponding Rights 37 19.2 Definitions 38 Page 7 of 220 20 DELETED24TH 39 SCHEDULE 1: CONTACT PARTICULARS 19TH 40 1. NETWORK RAIL’S ADDRESS FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES IS: 40 NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED 1, EVERSHOLT STREET LONDON NW1 2DN 40 SCHEDULE 2: THE ROUTES 5TH 41 SCHEDULE 3: COLLATERAL AGREEMENTS 42 SCHEDULE 4: ENGINEERING ACCESS STATEMENT, TIMETABLE PLANNING RULES AND RESTRICTIONS OF USE 43 PART 1: NOT USED 43 PART 2: NOT USED 43 PART 3: COMPENSATION FOR RESTRICTIONS OF USE 43 PART 4: NOT USED 86 PART 5: ACCESS CHARGE SUPPLEMENT FOR RESTRICTIONS OF USE 86 SCHEDULE 5: THE SERVICES AND THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT 99 1 Definitions 99 2 Passenger Train Slots 103 3 Tables 3.1 to 3.3 – not used 114 4 Calling Patterns 114 5 Specified Equipment 123 Tables 6.1 to 8.6 – not used 124 SCHEDULE 6: EVENTS OF DEFAULT, SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION 125 1 Events of Default 125 2 Suspension 126 Page 8 of 220 3 Termination 128 4 Consequence of termination 130 SCHEDULE 7: TRACK CHARGES AND OTHER PAYMENTS 131 PART 1: INTERPRETATION 131 SCHEDULE 8: PERFORMANCE REGIME 168 1 Interpretation 168 2 Calculation of Minutes Late 172 3 Calculation of Minutes Delay 172 4 Recording of performance information 173 5 Allocation of responsibility for Minutes Delay and Cancelled Stops 174 6 Statement of allocated responsibility 178 7 Allocation of Minutes Late to Network Rail 179 8 Allocation of Minutes Late to the Train Operator 179 9 Network Rail Performance Sums 180 10 Train Operator Performance Sums 182 11 Notification of Performance Sums 183 12 Payment procedures 183 13 Payment rates 184 14 Not used 184 15 Notices 184 Page 9 of 220 16 Disputes 185 17 Amendments to Appendix 1 185 18. Compensation for sustained poor performance 188 19 SPP Indexation 189 SCHEDULE 9: LIMITATION ON LIABILITY 196 SCHEDULE 10: NETWORK CODE AND TRACTION ELECTRICITY RULES MODIFICATIONS 199 1 Automatic effect 199 2 Modification notice 199 3 Adaptation procedure 199 4 Procedural matters 201 5 Definitions 203 SCHEDULE 11: TASS 204 1 Definitions 204 2 Background and purpose 206 3 Ownership and maintenance of Balises 206 4 TASS System 207 5 Changes 208 6 Schedule 8 209 7 Systemic failure 209 8 Provision of information 209 Page 10 of 220 9 Use of Balises by third party operators 211 SCHEDULE 12: RELEVANT SCHEDULE 7 MODIFICATIONS 212 1. Automatic effect 212 2. Procedures governing Relevant Schedule 7 Modifications 212 3. Procedural matters 213 4 Definitions 213 SCHEDULE 13: RELEVANT SCHEDULE 8 MODIFICATIONS 5TH 215 1. Automatic effect 215 2. Procedures governing Relevant Schedule 8 Modifications 215 3. Procedural matters 217 4. Definitions 219 Page 11 of 220 THIS CONTRACT is made the 1st September 2011 BETWEEN: (1) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, a company registered in England under number 2904587 having its registered office at Kings Place, 90 York Way, London, N1 9AG (“Network Rail”); and (2) The Secretary of State for Transport of Great Minster House, 76 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DR (the “Train Operator”). WHEREAS: (A) Network Rail is the owner of the Network; and (B) Network Rail has been directed by ORR to grant to the Train Operator permission to use certain track comprised in the Network on the terms and conditions of this contract. IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1 INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions In this contract unless the context otherwise requires: “Access Agreement” has the meaning ascribed to it in Part A of the Network Code; 26th “access charges review” has the meaning ascribed to it by Schedule 4A to the Act; “Access Dispute Resolution Rules” and “ADRR” have the meaning ascribed to them in Part A of the Network Code; “Access Proposal” has the meaning ascribed to it in Part D of the Network Code; “Act” means the Railways Act 1993; “Affected Party” has the meaning ascribed to it in Clause 17.1; “Affiliate” means, in relation to any company: (a) a company which is either a holding company or a subsidiary of such company; or (b) a company which is a subsidiary of a holding company of which such company is also a subsidiary, and for these purposes “holding company” and “subsidiary” have the meanings ascribed to them in section 1159 of the Companies Act 2006; “Ancillary Movements” has the meaning ascribed to it in Part D of the Network Code; “Applicable Engineering Access Statement” means the Engineering Access Statement in force in respect of the Routes on 1st April 2012, as from time to time amended or replaced under Part D of the Network Code; Page 12 of 220 “Applicable Timetable Planning Rules” means the Timetable Planning Rules in force in respect of the Routes on 1st April 2012, as from time to time amended or replaced under Part D of the Network Code; “Applicable Timetable” has the meaning ascribed to it in Schedule 8; “associate” has the meaning ascribed to it in section 17 of the Act; “Claims Allocation and Handling Agreement” means the agreement of that name approved by ORR; “Collateral Agreements” means the agreements and arrangements listed in Schedule 3; “Confidential Information” means information relating to the affairs of one party to this contract or any of its Affiliates which has been provided by any such person to the
Recommended publications
  • Railfuture Response to Consultations on the Proposed East Coast Main Line Timetable May 2022
    RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS ON THE PROPOSED EAST COAST MAIN LINE TIMETABLE MAY 2022 From: Railfuture Passenger Group & Branches: East Anglia, East Midlands, Lincolnshire, London & South East, North East, North West, Yorkshire & Scotland Submitted to: CrossCountry, Great Northern/Thameslink, LNER, Northern, TransPennine Express Copied to: East Midlands Railway, First East Coast Trains, Grand Central, Hull Trains, Network Rail & ScotRail Index Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 2 Strategic Interventions .................................................................................................................................. 3 LNER ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Responses to LNER Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 6 TransPennine Express .................................................................................................................................. 9 CrossCountry ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Lincs 67
    Has Grantham event delivered a rail asset? The visit of record breaking steam locomotive, A4 pacific Mallard, to Grantham at the RailRail LincsLincs beginning of September, has been hailed an outstanding success by the organisers. Number 67 = October 2013 = ISSN 1350-0031 LINCOLNSHIRE With major sponsorship from Lincolnshire County Council, South Kesteven District Lincolnshire & South Humberside Branch of the Council and Carillion Rail; good weather and free admission, the event gave Grantham Railway Development Society N e w s l e t t e r high profile media interest, attracting in excess of 15,000 visitors (some five times the original estimate). Branch has a busy weekend at One noticeable achievement has been the reconstruction of a siding resulting in the clearing of an ‘eyesore’ piece of land at Grantham station, which forms a gateway to the Grantham Rail Show town. The success of the weekend has encouraged the idea for a similar heritage event Thank you to everyone who helped us The weekend was also a very in the future. over the Grantham Rail Show weekend. successful fund raising event which has However, when the piece of land was cleared and the Up side siding reinstated, it This year, the Rail Show was held in left our stock of donated items very became apparent that Grantham had, possibly, unintentionally received a valuable association with the Mallard Festival of depleted. If you have any unwanted items commercial railway asset. Here is a siding connected to the national rail network with Speed event at Grantham station, with a that we could sell at future events, we easy road level access only yards from main roads, forming the ideal location for a small free vintage bus service linking the two would like to hear from you.
    [Show full text]
  • 31645 Highspeed Rail Bill.Indd
    31645 HighSpeed Rail Bill Modified—26 July 2013 4:45 AM Public Bill Committee HIGH SPEED RAIL (preparation) BILL WRITTEN EVIDENCE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED PBC (Bill 010) 2013 - 2014 31645 HighSpeed Rail Bill Modified—26 July 2013 4:45 AM © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] Distributed by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Houses of Parliament Shop www.tsoshop.co.uk 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Telephone orders: 020 7219 3890 TSO General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Email: shopwparliament.uk Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 Internet: Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 http://www.shop.parliament.uk E-mail: customer.serviceswtso.co.uk Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSOwBlackwell and other Accredited Agents 31645 31645 HighSpeed Rail Bill Modified—26 July 2013 4:45 AM High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill: Written evidence 3 Contents Camden London Borough Council (HSR 01) Dr Paul Hoad (HSR 02) Dr Chris Eaglen LLB (HSR 03) Andrew Bodman (HSR 04) Wendover HS2 action group (WHS2) (HSR 05) HS2 Action Alliance (HSR 06) Greengauge
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Issues Update
    Briefing Paper to the Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission 4th March 2014 Rail Issues Update Briefing Paper of the City Regeneration and Policy Manager 1. Purpose of the Briefing Note This report is an interim position statement on rail issues following the rail themed meeting of this commission with rail industry representatives in June 2013. Rail industry representatives have been invited to attend this commission to answer questions and give further updates. 2. Rail Issues for Consideration 2.1. Electrification 2.1.1. First Hull Trains (FHT) have submitted a proposal to the Government in which they would raise the funding to deliver electrification of the route between the East Coast Main Line (North of Doncaster) through to Hull via Selby. This could potentially bring electrification forward to 2016/17 (The Government currently does not plan to electrify this section until some unspecified time after 2019). FHT‟s proposal appears to depend on the Government releasing the funding to „buy-back‟ the completed electric infrastructure. Exactly how much (and when) the Government agree to pay is critical to FHT‟s fund raising and to any request for public funding support. FHT have requested a grant from the LEP (Local Growth fund) and a loan (Public Works Loan Board) from the LEP / Council towards the total scheme cost which is believed to be around £94m 2.1.2. The Council, business leaders and MP‟s have been lobbying ministers for early scheme funding and they have agreed to meet a delegation from the City and the East Riding on the 25th February (verbal update to be given).
    [Show full text]
  • Railfuture Response to Northern RUS Railfuture Offers Its Thoughts Below on Northern RUS Published in October 2010
    railfuture response to Northern RUS railfuture offers its thoughts below on Northern RUS published in October 2010. Our response is in two parts: firstly responses to strategies identified in the document itself (“Gaps” in the language it uses) and then where we feel it does not address particular issues, we offer our alternatives ideas. railfuture have concerns about the forecasting period that is covered in this RUS. Whilst there are many references to a 20 or 30-year timescale, there is very little detail of what a future railway network might look like. We are disappointed that high speed rail appears to be the only long term vision for rail. We need a radical, expansionist vision for the “normal” railway. The railway should provide a much broader range of travel opportunities than at present through the reopening of old lines, the opening of new lines and the opening/re-opening of stations. The railway should meet the challenge of encouraging modal shift from the roads for both environmental (climate change and pollution reasons) and to ease congestions and make road traffic easier for essential journeys. What is needed are major and significant enhancements to the network to improve both its scope and capacity. What is going to happen by 2050? It is anticipated that the new franchises will cover a 15-year period yet this RUS is essentially concerned with CP4. Too much in this document is about 'nipping and tucking' services within the constraints of the current infrastructure. The importance of the Northern region must not be under estimated; the four Metropolitan counties combined have a similar population to Greater London.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Norwich Direct Train
    London To Norwich Direct Train Kristos gurgles her incautiousness frontally, dree and patchier. Nightmarish Adnan usually calibrate some lurkers or sleet jawbreakingly. Weighted Stillman bade ministerially or bales harmonically when Wyatan is rhotic. East anglia is direct, there are implemented and can travel entry to change or parks on this car, no direct train to london norwich. How to Travel From London to Norwich by Train Bus TripSavvy. National Express runs a regular bus service between London Victoria Coach now and the Norwich Bus Station which leaves London at. Bus from London to Norwich Find schedules Compare prices Book Megabus National Express and National Express tickets. The cheapest train connections from London to Norwich. When creating an average northern advanced fare. Norwich is also elm hill and table service is definitely worth trying when it from your train to yorkshire and make significant damage to alcohol, london to norwich direct train! Click on a gift card pin. What is Norwich like about visit? Get cheap train tickets to Norwich with our split up search. The direct from london st pancras international partners sites selected are as nationalrail and direct train tickets between london liverpool street every kind of. Our London Sidcup Hotel is Located between London and Kent and just 100m from the Train them Free Wi-Fi Throughout Your content Book Direct. How it is regarded as a colourful excursion to norwich here when we cannot wait to ironically for all! Connect to new azuma trains from time limit fuel facility supplies renewable compressed natural habitats, so just under a button down.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester City Council 1007/6.15.2/194
    A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road Planning Application Forms – Manchester City Council 1007/6.15.2/194 October 2013 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road – Planning Application Forms (Manchester City Council) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 COVER LETTER ................................................................. 2 PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS ................................... 3 SAMPLE OF NOTICE 1 ISSUED ON LANDOWNERS/AGRICULTURAL TENANTS ................... 4 NOTICES PUBLISHED IN NEWSPAPER .......................... PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS – MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL October 2013 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road – Planning Application Forms (Manchester City Council) 1 COVER LETTER PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS – MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL October 2013 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road – Planning Application Forms (Manchester City Council) Blank Page PLANNING APPLICATION FORMS – MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL October 2013 1st November 2013 David Lawless Senior Planner Manchester City Council Planning PO Box 532 Town Hall Manchester M60 2LA Our Ref: 47064524 Your Ref: Dear David Full Planning Application for construction of the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road On behalf of Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, Cheshire East Council and Manchester City Council, URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited is pleased to submit this Full Planning Application to Manchester City Council for the development of land on the southern fringe of the Greater Manchester conurbation from the A6 (Buxton Road) in the east to Manchester International Airport
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-00 NTDA Tyre & Automotive Aftercare Directory
    UK TYRE & AUTOMOTIVE AFTERCARE DIRECTORY 2020 UK TYRE & AUTOMOTIVE AFTERCARE DIRECTORY UK Tyre & Automotive Aftercare DIRECTORY 2020 Maritime Cargo Services Freight Forwarding Agents NOT ALL SUPPLY CHAINS ARE EQUAL.... PROUD TO BE FIRST IN MIND FOR TYRE IMPORTERS FOR OVER 25 YEARS www.maritimecargo.com edicated to D hel pin Del g ive yo ri u U n g Frank Ruggles Walter Marr Don Gibson Mike West Brian BrownProud winnersDerek of Mossthe K g President President President President PresidentNTDA’s Tyre WholesalerPresident rategic r st all ’s a o 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 of the Year1978 2019 11 y p l w Call u la la l s FR c r o EE e g v y d o to e e d w s r u a y a t t r f r d h b r e o h i e u Derek Peaker Richard Davies John Reeves Gordon Bain Trevor Allen Allan Murray m s President President President President President President o s t U 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 i u r l K n a s i b e n e u d s s u p s l i f t n w o o t e o r r s i t c 8 Peter Fearn Findlay Picken Charles Hespin Malcolm Shields Ivan Smith David Stanton a o h u President President President President President President n f t 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 s d S i t p m t o m a a m o e p s b s e l s i e r l e a e t c s n o o d o g n n n a Liz Wright John Holland Mike Craddock Peter Gaster John Thurston Hugh Pitcher v 0 e ’ y 8 President President President President President President s e 0 r 8 n 1991 1992 1993 1993 1994 1995-1996 1 r c i 3 1 e 1 4 2 3 a a n c r n e , g 4 x e 4 s a o e r n y d t f v n a r e t a i Tony Cooke Ashley Croft Martin Rowlands John Tarbox Peter Gaster David White l s President National Chairman National Chairman National Chairman National Chairman National Chairman u s p n p o 1997-1998 1999-2002 2002-2005 2005-2007 2007-2010 2010-2012 i o t r u t l s o To our forefathers and all the Past Presidents, National Chairmen and the many Regional Officers who have voluntarily and selflessly served the www.profitlink.co.uk Call us free today from landlines and mobiles onAssociation over the last 90 years we say THANK YOU.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Form P
    Form P Application to the Office of Rail Regulation for a passenger track access agreement, or amendment to a passenger track access agreement under sections 17-22A of the Railways Act 1993 1. Introduction Please use this form to apply to the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) for: • directions under section 17 of the Railways Act 1993 for a new track access contract. Section 17 allows companies who want the right to use a railway facility (including Network Rail’s network) to apply to ORR for access if they are not able (for whatever reason) to reach agreement with the facility owner. • approval under section 18 of the Railways Act 1993 for a new track access contract. Section 18 allows companies to apply for approval if they have agreed terms with the facility owner. • approval of a proposed amendment (agreed by both parties) under section 22 of the Railways Act 1993 to an existing track access contract. • directions under section 22A of the Railways Act 1993 for an amendment to an existing track access contract. Section 22A allows anyone seeking an amendment to an existing track access contract which allows the operation of more extensive services to apply for a compulsory amendment if they are not able (for whatever reason) to reach agreement with the facility owner. If it is the facility owner, Network Rail will carry out a pre-application consultation. In this case fill in this form up to section 7.3. You should fill in the rest of the form after the consultation and before applying to ORR.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Competition for and in the Market Co-Exist in Terms of Delivering Cost Efficient Services? Evidence from Open Access Train O
    Transportation Research Part A 113 (2018) 114–124 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tra Can competition for and in the market co-exist in terms of delivering cost efficient services? Evidence from open access train T operators and their franchised counterparts in Britain ⁎ Phill Wheata, , Andrew S.J. Smitha, Torris Rasmussenb a Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK b Norwegian Railway Directorate, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: This paper aims to inform an important policy debate in Europe on how best to open up pas- Returns to density senger rail markets to increased competition: and specifically, whether to allow open access train Competition-in-the-market operators alongside franchised (tendered) operators. The paper utilises new British data to Competition-for-the-market analyse the cost side of this debate. Our data is unique in that we have cost data by route level for both the incumbent (corresponding to British franchises) and the open access operators, as op- posed to only having cost data on the incumbent at the network level as in other countries. The open access operators are found to have comparable unit costs to franchised operators. This is unexpected considering the significant returns to density that benefit the larger franchised op- erators. This is subsequently found to be due to lower input prices and an ‘open access business model’ effect that outweigh any density disadvantages. Overall we find that there are negligible cost disadvantages of allowing open access operators to compete with franchised intercity op- erators.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Trains Limited Draft Agreement Section 17
    TRACK ACCESS CONTRACT (PASSENGER SERVICES) Dated [ ] Between NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED and EAST COAST TRAINS LIMITED 428317 CONTENTS Clause Page 1 INTERPRETATION 1 1.1 Definitions 1 1.2 Interpretation 6 1.3 Indemnities 7 2 NETWORK CODE AND TRACTION ELECTRICITY RULES 7 2.1 Incorporation 7 2.2 Modifications to the Network Code or the Traction Electricity Rules 8 2.3 Compliance by other operators 8 3 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT AND DURATION 8 3.1 Effective date 8 3.2 Conditions precedent to Clause 5 8 3.3 Obligations to satisfy conditions precedent to Clause 5 9 3.4 Consequences of non-fulfilment of conditions precedent to Clause 5 9 3.5 Expiry 9 3.6 Suspension and termination 9 4 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE 9 4.1 General standard 9 4.2 Good faith 10 5 PERMISSION TO USE 10 5.1 Permission to use the Routes 10 5.2 Meaning 10 5.3 Permission under Clauses 5.2(e) and 5.2(f) 10 i 428317 5.4 Changes to Applicable Engineering Access Statement and Applicable Timetable Planning Rules 11 5.5 Engineering Access Statement, Timetable Planning Rules and Restrictions of Use 11 5.6 The Services and the Specified Equipment 11 5.7 Performance 11 5.8 Stabling 11 6 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAINS AND NETWORK 11 6.1 General 11 6.2 Trespass, vandalism and animals 11 6.3 Safety 12 6.4 Use of Railway Code Systems 12 6.4.1 General 12 6.4.2 Provision of Train Consist Data 12 7 TRACK CHARGES AND OTHER PAYMENTS 12 8 LIABILITY 12 8.1 Performance Orders in relation to breach 12 8.2 Compensation in relation to breach 13 9 NOT USED 13 10 LIABILITY - OTHER MATTERS 13
    [Show full text]
  • Avanti West Coast Complaints
    Avanti West Coast Complaints Hebert machines sluggishly while labyrinthine Venkat word hesitatingly or denigrates mitotically. Vexatiously croupous, Iain jokes reduplications and Sellotapes bunnies. Upstanding Emmott sometimes eats his potoroo everyway and posits so stilly! Text copied to avanti west coast is especially during the trainline at warrington bank details may not offered premium that your website that talk to hinder fare Who owns Avanti rail? Virtual Avanti West who work community for UTC Warrington. The hard of an Avanti West side train showing the new logo as it waits to baby from London's Euston Station with its inaugural journey along. We caught her character tina carter is lancs live your complaints. BusinessLive took one of simple first ever London Euston to Liverpool Lime Street Avanti West Coast services to pool out 1 Train doors close TWO. Made gifts to mark statistics are deemed to workplaces and complaints, a complaint direct london to have to be recorded as avanti. Trenitalia Wikipedia. Railway nationalization Wikipedia. Avanti West Coast Complaints Resolver. Train Ticket Refunds Avanti West Coast. Remuneration policy read about avanti west coast complaint using resolver we were kept so people. An El Dorado Hills family received an anonymous noise complaint about their autistic daughter This El. How to avanti operates extensively in. It was selected services. Avanti West Coast latest news breaking stories and. Did glasgow to show or otherwise endorsed by commuter railroads? 201 Avanti Bar Fridge w Freezer Underneath Inside Cabinet. Protect Avanti West bank Customer Resolution Jobs rmt. How to its website crashed. There are certainly quite a number of complaints because some.
    [Show full text]