DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Consultation Point

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Consultation Point Consultation Point: Foreword Person ID 1214453 Full Name Mr Steven Fayers ID 41 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Individual/Resident Date Received - Date Received: 2016-11-29 Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate No Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to Legally Compliant be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the No Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to Please see attached letter describing the reasons for the plan being unsound. improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-level upload - Please upload any supporting evidence Plan-Level: Duty to Co-operate - Do you consider the Local Plan to Not Met have met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate in accordance with section 110 of Localism Act 2011 and section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004? Please note that any non-compliance with the Duty to Co-operate is incapable of modification at examination Duty to Co-operate a - Please give details of why you consider the There is no reference in the plan to having co-operated or attempting to Local Plan has met/not met the requirements of the Duty to co-operated with the following neighbouring authorities: Co-operate.Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Hertfordshire County Council Dacorum District Council Three Rivers District Council London Borough of Hillingdon Windsor and Maidenhead Unitary Authority Attendance at the EiP - If your representation is proposing a No modification(s), do you consider is necessary to participate at the examination in public? 2153 Attend EiPb - If you wish to participate at the examination in public, please outline why you consider this to be necessary (please be as precise and succinct as possible Policy Level - PP - If you do not believe this policy to be positively prepared please explain why PP Mods - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 1 - If you do not believe this policy to be justified please explain why Policy 2a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 2 - If you do not believe this policy to be effective please explain why. PAa - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 3 - If you do not believe this policy in consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework Feb 2019 please explain why Policy 3a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy-level file upload - Please attach any supporting evidence Person ID 1216826 Full Name Ms Rachel Padgett ID 88 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to Non-Compliant be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the With the construction of HS2 taking place at the same time it will be in breach Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to of noise and pollution compliance relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the No Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of No Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local The infrastructure cannot sustain extra traffic to include construction traffic of Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, new build and HS2. The roads between Beaconsfield and Amersham are already policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as full to capacity causing road users to divert through smaller villages (including possible. taxis and heavy vehicles) causing noise, disruption and damage to the small roads in the area (notably cosehill, Penn street and Winchmore Hill) 2154 Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-level upload - Please upload any supporting evidence Plan-Level: Duty to Co-operate - Do you consider the Local Plan to have met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate in accordance with section 110 of Localism Act 2011 and section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004? Please note that any non-compliance with the Duty to Co-operate is incapable of modification at examination Duty to Co-operate a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan has met/not met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate.Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Attendance at the EiP - If your representation is proposing a modification(s), do you consider is necessary to participate at the examination in public? Attend EiPb - If you wish to participate at the examination in public, please outline why you consider this to be necessary (please be as precise and succinct as possible Policy Level - PP - If you do not believe this policy to be positively prepared please explain why PP Mods - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 1 - If you do not believe this policy to be justified please explain why Policy 2a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 2 - If you do not believe this policy to be effective please explain why. PAa - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 3 - If you do not believe this policy in consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework Feb 2019 please explain why Policy 3a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy-level file upload - Please attach any supporting evidence Person ID 1217713 Full Name Dr Iain miller ID 97 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details 2155 Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to Non-Compliant be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the I believe that the use of green belt resources is non-compliant, as exceptional Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to circumstances have not been established. A more optimal solution would be to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise delayed until the Unitary Council is in place, when more brownfield sites could and succinct as possible. be considered Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Yes Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) The plan should be delayed below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of No Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local The plan will impose an unreasonable burden on local communities. The Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, development should be more dispersed across a unitary council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wendover Kingshill Chalfont St
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SELECT COMMITTEE HS2 (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL 14 July 2015 Petitioner – The Chiltern Society No. 0761 A1194 (1) 0761 / 1 HOC/00761/0003 Chiltern Society Presentation 1. About the Chiltern Society 2. AONB & Countryside issues 3. Water related issues 4. AONB Planning Policy 5. Three Bore Tunnel Option 6. Mitigation Hierarchy 7. Chiltern Society’s Conclusion A1194 (2) 0761 / 2 HOC/00761/0004 1. About the Chiltern Society o Founded 50 years ago • to conserve and enhance the Chiltern Hills • to campaign for the AONB to be confirmed • to campaign against the M40 cutting • to reinstate footpaths post-WWII o Registered charity o 7,000 members A1194 (3) 0761 / 3 HOC/00761/0005 500 volunteers – the largest group in any AONB A1194 (4) 0761 / 4 HOC/00761/0006 Chiltern Society - interest groups o Rights of Way o Site management o Walking o Cycling o Rivers & wetlands o Planning o Heritage o Photographic A1194 (5) 0761 / 5 HOC/00761/0007 Chiltern Society - what we do o Maintain rights of way o Manage 13 nature reserves and heritage sites o Participate at all levels of the UK planning system o Work with a wide range of national, regional and local environmental organisations o Work on chalk streams and wetlands o Provide opportunities to volunteer and learn new skills o Support local community groups A1194 (6) 0761 / 6 HOC/00761/0008 Chiltern Society – some notable achievements o Founded Chiltern Open Air Museum o Restored Lacey Green Windmill and Ewelme Watercress Beds o Created the Chiltern Way long distance circular footpath
    [Show full text]
  • Bledlow Beechwoods and Bledda’S Rest
    point your feet on a new path Bledlow Beechwoods and Bledda’s Rest Distance: 16 km=10 miles moderate walking Region: Chilterns Date written: 2-sep-2010 Author: Phegophilos Date revised: 27-aug-2018 Refreshments: Bledlow, Bennett End Last update: 17-nov-2020 Maps: Explorer 181 (Chiltern Hills North), Explorer 171 (Chiltern Hills West) (hopefully not needed) Problems, changes? We depend on your feedback: [email protected] Public rights are restricted to printing, copying or distributing this document exactly as seen here, complete and without any cutting or editing. See Principles on main webpage. Village, woodland, nature reserves, hills, views In Brief This truly unforgettable walk shows you all that is best in the Chiltern Hills. You go through great beechwoods, along valleys and over the Bledlow Ridge with terrific views. The walk begins and ends in a snug Chiltern village which holds its own surprises. The village has one of the iconic pubs of the Chilterns (to enquire at the Lions of Bledlow , ring 01844-343345). Along the way, you can stop at the Boot in the Ridge (ring 01494-481499). You also pass one of the great foodie pubs (see text), requiring long advance booking. This walk is a tribute to Raymond Hugh’s Adventurous Walks books, since it follows the same route as one of his walks. These books are out of print but still possibly available by mail order and the other nine walks are also a pleasure to do. There are only a few nettles on this walk and sensible shoes should be adequate in dry weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire Report to the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions November 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 257 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 33 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for South Bucks: Detailed Mapping 35 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for the parishes of Denham and Gerrards Cross is inserted inside the back cover of this report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey Appendix: South Bucks District
    Ancient Woodland Inventory for the Chilterns Appendix - South Bucks District Chiltern Woodlands CONSERVATION BOARD Project Chiltern District Council WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 1. Introduction his appendix summarises results from the Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey for the whole of South Bucks District in the County of Buckinghamshire (see map 1 for details). For more information on the project and Tits methodology, please refer to the main report, 1which can be downloaded from www.chilternsaonb.org The Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey area includes parts of Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire. The extent of the project area included, but was not confined to, the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). 2 The work follows on from previous revisions in the South East. The Chilterns survey was hosted by the Chilterns Conservation Board with support from the Chiltern Woodlands Project, Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and Surrey Biodiversity Information Centre (SBIC). The work was funded by Buckinghamshire County Council, Chilterns Conservation Board, Chiltern District Council, Dacorum Borough Council, Forestry Commission, Hertfordshire County Council, Natural England and Wycombe District Council. Map 1: Project aims The Survey Area, showing Local Authority areas covered and the Chilterns AONB The primary aim of the County Boundaries survey was to revise and Chilterns AONB update the Ancient Entire Districts Woodland Inventory and Chiltern District
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Providing a Tourism Baseline in the HS2 Corridor
    The volume and value of tourism in the HS2 corridor of the Chilterns AONB A baseline study Prepared by: TSE Research Services 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH Contributors and dedication Dedication This report is dedicated to Shirley Judges, (1949-2014), a passionate supporter and ardent protector of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Without Shirley’s infectious enthusiasm this project would not have happened. Shirley gave unstintingly of her time and energy to protect the area she loved from HS2, but she also knew the importance of assembling robust evidence, using recognised research methods and arming oneself with the relevant facts and figures to fight a cause. Drive and determination had to matched by the evidence. Shirley wanted a proper baseline study on the value of tourism threatened by HS2. At her specific request we raised the money and commissioned Tourism South East, a specialist tourist organisation with a research arm, to undertake the study. The Chilterns Conservation Board, where Shirley had been a dedicated board member for 10 years, kindly agreed to manage the project. Shirley’s wish was to petition to the Select Committee. Through this report she will. Acknowledgements The following organisations provided a financial contribution to the study: Amersham HS2 Action Group Chesham Society Chilterns Conservation Board Chiltern Ridges Action Group Chiltern Society Great Missenden HS2 Action Group Great Missenden Parish Council Great Missenden Revitalisation Group Great Missenden Village Association Private donation (on behalf of Chalfont St Giles) Residents’ Environmental Protection Association Wendover Action Group Wendover Parish Council Thanks With thanks to the many people who contributed to the local tourism business audits, in particular Hilary Wharf and Jean Slater.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartometro London Edition
    @g A B C How Wood (Herts) D E F G H I J King's Cross - St. Pancras Detail Level crossing Pad 22/08/1865 London Underground : 25/09/1949 removed from London Underground : 30/03/1994 2 1 1 2 Blake Hall Closed 31/10/1981 North Weald Loco Pit Ron's Siding Spur Version 3.4 3 Hotel Curve 2 1 York Road Curve Ongar Metropolitan Kings Langley h tt Maiden p Lane Chesham Bricket Wood : Curve 1 / r 2 Goods yard August 2015 /c f . GREATER LONDON ar e t re Redland Road o. .f Level crossing Stone Siding metro Cheshunt Kings Cross Tunnel Overground y g y Kings Cross loop Cheshunt Junction 1 Up Goods Loop Underground, Central 27 1 Epping Theobalds Grove 2 1 Transport Tracks Map Overground, DLR, Level crossing Level crossing Garston (Hertfordshire) Radlett Tracks map with platforms, connections & depots Tramlink & National Rail Waltham Cross Watford Tunnels 24/04/1865 London Underground : 25/09/1949 to Brill & VerneyJunction © 2015 - Franklin JARRIER - Reproduction prohibited without the permission of the author - [email protected] - http://carto.metro.free.fr (part of the metropolitan from 1892 to 1936) Metropolitan Amersham Radlett Junction 31 32 Watford North 3 2 34 NR / LUL 1 Turkey Street boudary 01/09/1892 Hadley Wood North tunnels 2 Theydon Bois 1 Level crossing Enfield Lock Chalfont & Latimer Hadley Wood 3 2 1 Watford north Junction Hadley Wood South tunnels 11 10 Gordon Hill 7 6 9 8 Overground Watford Yard 3 5 1 4 Watford Junction 2 Watford 08/07/1889 south Junction Metropolitan 21 22 1 Watford 23 2 24 Level crossing Elstree & Borehamwood
    [Show full text]
  • REQUESTS from PARISH COUNCILS, GENERAL PUBLIC Etc PRIORITY for COMMENTS 25 JANUARY 2001 : SOUTH BUCKS LOCAL COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION 1
    APPENDIX A REQUESTS FROM PARISH COUNCILS, GENERAL PUBLIC etc PRIORITY FOR COMMENTS 25 JANUARY 2001 : SOUTH BUCKS LOCAL COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION 1. HGV Restrictions Farnham Common Templewood Lane – A request has been received from a local resident L 4 PIA’s. 2 occurred in 1998. Possible asking for a weight restriction in Templewood Lane introduction of a weight restriction could be considered following the signalisation of the Templewood crossroads junction. 2. Miscellaneous Beaconsfield Various roads in the vicinity of St Mary’s School, Maxwell Road - A L1 PIA petition has been received from local residents requesting better lighting Petition – see report and footways in the Candlemas Meads, Ronald Road, Waller Road and Hyde Green areas Denham Denham Village to Denham Green – A request has been received from M 21 PIA’s along A40 Oxford Road and Denham Parish Council for a segregated cycle path between Oxford A412 North Orbital Road between Gardens and Denham Station Oxford Gardens and Denham Station Farnham Common Parsonage Lane - A request has been received from a local resident L0 PIA’s asking for a layby near the Purton Lane junction Stoke Poges B416 Grays Park Road – A request has been received from Stoke Poges L 2 PIA’s – 1 involved intoxicated driver. Parish Council for a mini-roundabout at the Park Road junction. Due to site constraints, a mini- roundabout is not possible 3. Pedestrian Crossings Beaconsfield A40 London Road / Wycombe End – A request has been received from * 0 PIA’s. This site will be considered in Beaconsfield Town Council for a pedestrian refuge near Butlers Court the Pedestrian Crossings Annual Road to assist school children in crossing to and from the Bus Stop on the Review south side of the A40 Beaconsfield A40 Oxford Road – A request has been received via the Area Manager * 0 PIA’s.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Tring and Wigginton
    Walk 5 Walk 5 Tring and Wigginton A varied and more challenging walk along undulating chalk hills, through beech to woodlands and back along the Grand Union Canal. The walk follows a section of Aldbury the Ridgeway through Wigginton, one of the highest villages in the Chilterns with P Tring wonderful views. 9 Tring Station Distance: 4¼ miles (allow 2¼ hours) 1 Grand Pendley Manor Start: Tring Station (or the Greyhound Inn, Wigginton, with permission). Union Canal Access Information: There is a moderate climb from the footbridge over the A41 to Wigginton, otherwise the route is relatively level. Refreshments: Both the Cow Roast pub and the Greyhound Inn serve food. 2 Route: A4251 8 Starting from Tring Station, turn left along Lewin's Farm. Follow this across fields and the road over the canal bridge and take the through a wood, (signed Chiltern Way) until Tring Park first turn on your left into Beggars Lane, you reach another footpath at a ‘T’ junction. 3 also signposted the Ridgeway. After about Turn right (signposted ‘Public Footpath to 4 200 yards, take the footpath on your right. 1 Cow Roast’) and down a concrete track to Wigginton Follow Ridgeway signs to reach the A4251 the road. Turn left to go through the tunnel 6 road, crossing over the road at the traffic under the A41, then immediately right along Cow 7 island 2 then over the bridge to cross the a byway to go past Tinker's Lodge on your Roast A41 below. Follow the Ridgeway uphill until left and continue to the A4251 and the Cow PH you reach a lane 'The Twist'; 3 cross over Roast pub, once a stop-off for cattle on their and continue along a footpath until you way to London markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Walks on Commons Between Ewelme and Ibstone
    ea of Outstanding Natural Beauty Natural Outstanding of ea Ar an © ovided by Clive Ormonde and Phil Gibbs Phil and Ormonde Clive by ovided pr kindly aphs Photogr stmas Common stmas Chri or een Gr Cookley Ewelme, om om fr miles 18 and 8 between s walk cular Cir s. volunteer om fr ide s country the ough thr outes r storic hi funding by the Heritage Lottery Fund and help help and Fund Lottery Heritage the by funding s and and s view open wide of e mixtur a om om fr benefits oject Pr The oject. Pr Commons s while enjoying enjoying while s walk cular cir these in d as part of the Chilterns Chilterns the of part as d Boar Conservation oduced by the Chilterns Chilterns the by oduced pr been has leaflet This s s common Chiltern some scover Di s g/common .or aonb s .chiltern www e about Chilterns commons at at commons Chilterns about e mor Learn alley V urville T . Society the join to or maps footpath Society Chiltern obtain amme, to to amme, ogr pr walk Society's Chiltern the on information eatwestern.co.uk eatwestern.co.uk stgr .fir www g.uk .or society .chiltern www • • 1250 for for 1250 77 1494 0 call or Visit 165 or visit visit or 165 5 600 0845 Chilterns Country walks. Country Chilterns Blue Fleabane Blue Call National Rail Enquiries Enquiries Rail National Call g .or aonb s .chiltern www 1844 355500 for other other for 355500 1844 0 call or Visit • e many other wonderful walks in the Chilterns: the in walks wonderful other many e ar e Ther Henley-on-Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report
    Society Climate Change Transport Economy Environment Housing Open Space Spatial Development Strategy Annual Monitoring Report 2013/14 Part Two: Technical Appendices January 2015 0 South Bucks District Council AMR 2013/14 Part two: Technical Appendix Contents Appendix Title Page No Appendix A Outstanding Permissions for Housing Development 2 Appendix B Density of Completed Housing Development 8 Appendix C Density of New Permissions 10 Appendix D Dwelling Type and Size of New Permissions 13 Appendix E Dwelling Type and Size of Completions 16 Sites Under Construction (update of the SHLAA Appendix F 19 report Appendix 5) Sites with Outstanding Planning Permission Appendix G 21 (update of the SHLAA report Appendix 6) SHLAA Sites (update of the SHLAA report Appendix Appendix H 26 7) SHLAA Sites with previous refusal (update of the Appendix I 40 SHLAA report Appendix 8) 1 Appendix A(a): Outstanding Permissions for Housing Developments 2013/14 PDL: Previously Developed Land Total No. of Units in GF: Green Field Land Net gain in new units GF/PDL Status scheme NYS: Not Yet Started UC: Under Construction Market Affordable Market Affordable BEACONSFIELD Small sites <0.4 ha. 12/00257/XOUT Avela, 72 Ledborough Lane PDL NYS 1 0 2 0 11/00099/OUT 3 Penington Road PDL NYS 1 0 2 0 14/00137/FUL 22 Westfield Road PDL NYS 1 0 2 0 11/00879/FUL 72 London End PDL UC 1 0 2 0 Oakwood, 50 Ledborough 13/00293/FUL PDL UC 1 0 1 0 Lane Oakwood, 50 Ledborough 11/00925/FUL PDL UC 1 0 1 0 Lane Oakwood, 50 Ledborough 11/00926/FUL PDL UC 0 0 1 0 Lane Telephone Rep Station, 11/01007/FUL PDL NYS 2 0 2 0 Oxford Road Revital Health and Beauty, 11/01219/FUL PDL NYS 3 0 3 0 12 The Highway 12/00032/FUL Beaconsfield High School PDL UC 4 0 4 0 12/00371/FUL 111 Wattleton Road PDL UC 1 0 2 0 12/00799/FUL 157 Amersham Road PDL UC 1 0 2 0 12/00855/FUL Portway, 41 Candlemas Lane GF NYS 1 0 1 0 12/01498/FUL York House, Wycombe End PDL NYS 1 0 1 0 12/00767/FUL 22-24 Grove Road PDL UC 6 0 8 0 12/01817/OUT Land rear of 49 Lakes Lane GF NYS 1 0 1 0 Greenacres, 119 Station 12/01707/FUL PDL NYS 10 0 11 0 Road Land Adj.
    [Show full text]