DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Plan by Consultation Point Foreword

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Plan by Consultation Point Foreword Local Plan by Consultation Point Foreword Person ID 1224143 Full Name Land and Partners ID 5919 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID 1224130 Full Name Alex Dalton Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Non-Compliant Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please The Plan is not consistent with national policy as it conflicts with give details of why you the National Planning Policy Framework (ªthe NPPFº), which is national policy and advice that the consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, Councils must have regard to when preparing their Plan (Section 19(2) of the Planning and Compulsory including references to Purchase Act 2004). The Plan is not consistent with the NPPF in the following ways: relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. · It does not deliver sustainable development, which is the NPPF's core concept and is set out in Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the NPPF, particularly in terms of providing sufficient numbers of homes and sufficient land of the right type and in the right place. · It does not meet NPPF paragraphs 136-138 that alteration of Green Belt boundaries are not fully evidenced and justified (having regard to their intended permanence in the long term so they can endure beyond the Plan period) and in terms of promoting sustainable patterns of development, particularly in relation to the town of Slough and transport nodes into London and Heathrow. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do No you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? 1 Soundness mods - Please 1.1. The Local Plan does not comply with Section 20(5)a of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act give details of why you 2004 (the Act). Specifically, the Plan does not have regard to the National Policy issued by the Secretary consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including of State as required by Section 19(2)a of the Act. references to relevant legislation, policies and/or 1.2. Paragraph 26 of the NPPF states that effective and on-going joint working is integral to plan making. regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as The Plan is not based on effective and on-going joint working with Slough Borough Council (BC), where possible. there is a strategic cross-border issue that the Plan does not address. The unmet housing need within Slough BC has been brought to the attention of Chiltern and South Bucks throughout the Plan-making process, but has not been taken into account in the spatial strategy. 1.3. Paragraph 27 of the NPPF states that in order to demonstrate effective and on-going joint working, strategic policy- making authorities should prepare and maintain one or more statements of common ground, documenting the cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress in co-operating to address these. There is no statement of common ground with Slough BC supporting this Plan. 1.4. The Plan has not had regard to paragraph 136 of the NPPF which states: ªStrategic policies should establish the need for any changes to Green Belt boundaries, having regard to their intended permanence in the long term, so they can endure beyond the plan period.º 1.5. At paragraph 3.5.7 the Plan refers to a review of the Plan which considers further the Green Belt Boundary north of Slough. The new boundaries' endurance beyond 2036 is conditional on this potential further consideration. The Plan is therefore in conflict with the NPPF as the proposed new boundaries are not permanent in the long term without further consideration. 1.6. These matters also relate to the duty to co-operate and the tests of soundness of the Plan. They are explained in greater detail in the relevant sections. 2.2. The Plan is not positively prepared for the following reasons: · The Plan is not sufficiently informed by agreements with other authorities so that unmet need from neighbouring areas is accommodated where it is practical to do so and is consistent with achieving sustainable development. Specifically, it should have accommodated the unmet needs of Slough - a large town directly on the border of the plan area. · The Plan should have reviewed Green Belt to consider the longer term requirements of Slough rather than defer this decision to a future plan. · The Plan does not provide a strategy which meets area's objectively assessed needs due to errors in its calculation of housing land supply. 2.6. Table LPb on page 53 of the Plan is incorrect. The Total Supply in (K) sets out the housing requirement for the Plan area of 11,099. This is derived from (O) Overall supply needed minus (Q) Requirement needed from Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan. However, the components of supply are 682 homes short as only 10,417 is identified: (B) Completions (1,217) (D-F) Commitments (1,759) (H) Other HELAA sites (1,791) (I) Windfalls (450) (J) Site Allocations (5,200) 2.7. Also completions should actually be 1,217 according to Table LPa on page 51 of the Plan, giving a requirement for a further 46. 2.8. Therefore, the Plan does not provide a strategy which meets the area's objectively assessed needs due to errors in its calculation of 2 housing land supply. This means that its strategy is not deliverable over the Plan period. By not providing sufficient numbers of homes, the Plan will not deliver sustainable development as required by Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the NPPF. The South Bucks and Chiltern Plan preparation has proceeded on the basis of only addressing the housing needs of Buckinghamshire and to ignore those in Berkshire. They were clearly aware of the all the evidence of Slough's unmet need throughout 2017 and RBWM's stated inability to accommodate it, yet did not factor this in to their planmaking process at all. Slough BC had formally requested that South Bucks accommodate some of its unmet need in 2016, as set out in the Duty to Co-operate section below, but there was no political will to do so. · The approach of the Councils has been to assume the export of unmet need to Aylesbury Vale despite agreeing that the need would only be exported if it were impossible to accommodate within the Plan area. · The Plan does not accommodate housing need from Slough, despite Slough's request for it to do so. · The Plan does not demonstrate that the development sites, and thus the overall spatial strategy, has been selected for inclusion in the Plan on a robust, consistent and objective basis. Potential sites have been rejected and sites have been selected without adequate evidence and reasoning. · The influence of the town of Slough, adjoining the southern border of the Plan area, has not sufficiently influenced the spatial strategy. In particular, sustainable settlements close to Slough are not given sufficient consideration for growth, based on this proximity. · The influence of the transport nodes into London has not sufficiently influenced the spatial strategy. In particular, the new Crossrail/Elizabeth Line into London is not given sufficient recognition in terms of opportunities for growth. · Heathrow and its planned expansion has not sufficiently influenced the spatial strategy. The new Crossrail/Elizabeth Line link to this major employment location has not been considered. · The errors in the Plan's calculation of housing land supply in the Plan means that its strategy is not deliverable over the Plan period. · The Plan is not based upon adequate joint working on a critical cross-boundary strategic matter. The development needs of Slough is a cross-boundary strategic matter and a request from Slough BC to assist with meeting this need has been rebuffed. A joint `Wider Area Growth Study' has recently been commenced but this is not taken account of in the Publication Plan. It defers the housing needs of Slough BC and the associated Green Belt implications. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan©s ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify 1.1. In order to demonstrate the Plan has had regard to paragraphs 26 and 27 of the NPPF, it needs to how you would modify this be based upon effective joint working on cross-border issues. The cross-border issue of Slough's policy to improve its alignment to this test of housing needs should be addressed within the Plan period and a statement of common ground between soundness. Please be as the neighbouring authorities should be produced. precise and succinct as possible. 1.2. In order to demonstrate that regard has been had to paragraph 136 of the NPPF, the Plan cannot rely on a review to ensure Green Belt Boundaries can endure beyond the Plan period. Therefore, the Green 3 Belt Part Two Assessment, Green Belt Development Options Appraisal and associated allocations require rewriting based upon ensuring that the revised Green Belt boundary will endure beyond the Plan period. 1.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire Report to the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions November 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 257 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 33 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for South Bucks: Detailed Mapping 35 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for the parishes of Denham and Gerrards Cross is inserted inside the back cover of this report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey Appendix: South Bucks District
    Ancient Woodland Inventory for the Chilterns Appendix - South Bucks District Chiltern Woodlands CONSERVATION BOARD Project Chiltern District Council WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 1. Introduction his appendix summarises results from the Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey for the whole of South Bucks District in the County of Buckinghamshire (see map 1 for details). For more information on the project and Tits methodology, please refer to the main report, 1which can be downloaded from www.chilternsaonb.org The Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey area includes parts of Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire. The extent of the project area included, but was not confined to, the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). 2 The work follows on from previous revisions in the South East. The Chilterns survey was hosted by the Chilterns Conservation Board with support from the Chiltern Woodlands Project, Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and Surrey Biodiversity Information Centre (SBIC). The work was funded by Buckinghamshire County Council, Chilterns Conservation Board, Chiltern District Council, Dacorum Borough Council, Forestry Commission, Hertfordshire County Council, Natural England and Wycombe District Council. Map 1: Project aims The Survey Area, showing Local Authority areas covered and the Chilterns AONB The primary aim of the County Boundaries survey was to revise and Chilterns AONB update the Ancient Entire Districts Woodland Inventory and Chiltern District
    [Show full text]
  • REQUESTS from PARISH COUNCILS, GENERAL PUBLIC Etc PRIORITY for COMMENTS 25 JANUARY 2001 : SOUTH BUCKS LOCAL COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION 1
    APPENDIX A REQUESTS FROM PARISH COUNCILS, GENERAL PUBLIC etc PRIORITY FOR COMMENTS 25 JANUARY 2001 : SOUTH BUCKS LOCAL COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION 1. HGV Restrictions Farnham Common Templewood Lane – A request has been received from a local resident L 4 PIA’s. 2 occurred in 1998. Possible asking for a weight restriction in Templewood Lane introduction of a weight restriction could be considered following the signalisation of the Templewood crossroads junction. 2. Miscellaneous Beaconsfield Various roads in the vicinity of St Mary’s School, Maxwell Road - A L1 PIA petition has been received from local residents requesting better lighting Petition – see report and footways in the Candlemas Meads, Ronald Road, Waller Road and Hyde Green areas Denham Denham Village to Denham Green – A request has been received from M 21 PIA’s along A40 Oxford Road and Denham Parish Council for a segregated cycle path between Oxford A412 North Orbital Road between Gardens and Denham Station Oxford Gardens and Denham Station Farnham Common Parsonage Lane - A request has been received from a local resident L0 PIA’s asking for a layby near the Purton Lane junction Stoke Poges B416 Grays Park Road – A request has been received from Stoke Poges L 2 PIA’s – 1 involved intoxicated driver. Parish Council for a mini-roundabout at the Park Road junction. Due to site constraints, a mini- roundabout is not possible 3. Pedestrian Crossings Beaconsfield A40 London Road / Wycombe End – A request has been received from * 0 PIA’s. This site will be considered in Beaconsfield Town Council for a pedestrian refuge near Butlers Court the Pedestrian Crossings Annual Road to assist school children in crossing to and from the Bus Stop on the Review south side of the A40 Beaconsfield A40 Oxford Road – A request has been received via the Area Manager * 0 PIA’s.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report
    Society Climate Change Transport Economy Environment Housing Open Space Spatial Development Strategy Annual Monitoring Report 2013/14 Part Two: Technical Appendices January 2015 0 South Bucks District Council AMR 2013/14 Part two: Technical Appendix Contents Appendix Title Page No Appendix A Outstanding Permissions for Housing Development 2 Appendix B Density of Completed Housing Development 8 Appendix C Density of New Permissions 10 Appendix D Dwelling Type and Size of New Permissions 13 Appendix E Dwelling Type and Size of Completions 16 Sites Under Construction (update of the SHLAA Appendix F 19 report Appendix 5) Sites with Outstanding Planning Permission Appendix G 21 (update of the SHLAA report Appendix 6) SHLAA Sites (update of the SHLAA report Appendix Appendix H 26 7) SHLAA Sites with previous refusal (update of the Appendix I 40 SHLAA report Appendix 8) 1 Appendix A(a): Outstanding Permissions for Housing Developments 2013/14 PDL: Previously Developed Land Total No. of Units in GF: Green Field Land Net gain in new units GF/PDL Status scheme NYS: Not Yet Started UC: Under Construction Market Affordable Market Affordable BEACONSFIELD Small sites <0.4 ha. 12/00257/XOUT Avela, 72 Ledborough Lane PDL NYS 1 0 2 0 11/00099/OUT 3 Penington Road PDL NYS 1 0 2 0 14/00137/FUL 22 Westfield Road PDL NYS 1 0 2 0 11/00879/FUL 72 London End PDL UC 1 0 2 0 Oakwood, 50 Ledborough 13/00293/FUL PDL UC 1 0 1 0 Lane Oakwood, 50 Ledborough 11/00925/FUL PDL UC 1 0 1 0 Lane Oakwood, 50 Ledborough 11/00926/FUL PDL UC 0 0 1 0 Lane Telephone Rep Station, 11/01007/FUL PDL NYS 2 0 2 0 Oxford Road Revital Health and Beauty, 11/01219/FUL PDL NYS 3 0 3 0 12 The Highway 12/00032/FUL Beaconsfield High School PDL UC 4 0 4 0 12/00371/FUL 111 Wattleton Road PDL UC 1 0 2 0 12/00799/FUL 157 Amersham Road PDL UC 1 0 2 0 12/00855/FUL Portway, 41 Candlemas Lane GF NYS 1 0 1 0 12/01498/FUL York House, Wycombe End PDL NYS 1 0 1 0 12/00767/FUL 22-24 Grove Road PDL UC 6 0 8 0 12/01817/OUT Land rear of 49 Lakes Lane GF NYS 1 0 1 0 Greenacres, 119 Station 12/01707/FUL PDL NYS 10 0 11 0 Road Land Adj.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaconsfield
    Beaconsfield Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Assessment Report Caput House, Old Beaconsfield The Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project was carried out between 2008 and 2012 by Buckinghamshire County Council with the support of English Heritage © Buckinghamshire County Council and English Heritage 2008 Report produced by Ruth Beckley and David Green All the mapping contained in this report is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100021529 (2008) All Historic Photographs are reproduced courtesy of the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies unless otherwise stated. Copies of this report and further information can be obtained from: Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Advisory and Compliance Service, Place Service, Buckinghamshire County Council County Hall Aylesbury Bucks HP20 1UY Tel: 01296 382656 Email: [email protected] Beaconsfield Historic Town Assessment Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Project Background and Purpose ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTORAL REVIEW of SOUTH BUCKS Draft Recommendations For
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SOUTH BUCKS Draft recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of South Bucks April 2014 BEACONSFIELD NORTH Sheet 1 of 1 B This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2014. Boundary alignments and names shown on the mapping background A may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information applied as part of this review. BEACONSFIELD CP KEY TO PARISH WARDS BEACONSFIELD WEST BEACONSFIELD SOUTH D BEACONSFIELD CP C A CENTRAL B NORTH C SOUTH EAST D WEST BURNHAM CP E BEECHES F CHURCH G LENT RISE GERRARDS CROSS IVER CP GERRARDS CROSS CP H IVER HEATH I IVER VILLAGE AND RICHINGS PARK J SHREDING GREEN K WOOD LANE HEDGERLEY CP WEXHAM CP L GEORGE GREEN AND MIDDLE GREEN M THE ORCHARDS DENHAM N WEXHAM STREET DENHAM CP FARNHAM AND HEDGERLEY FULMER CP BURNHAM CHURCH AND BEECHES E FARNHAM ROYAL CP STOKE POGES STOKE POGES CP WEXHAM AND FULMER BURNHAM CP IVER HEATH TAPLOW CP H N WEXHAM CP F K IVER CP BURNHAM LENT RISE AND TAPLOW L J G IVER VILLAGE AND RICHINGS PARK M I 0 1 2 kilometres 1cm = 0.2090km KEY DISTRICT COUNCIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY DORNEY CP PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY IVER HEATH PROPOSED WARD NAME IVER CP PARISH NAME.
    [Show full text]
  • Locality Profile 2016
    Locality Profile 2016 Locality Profile Southern Locality Chapters Map of the locality Demographics and Public Health Data Changes over the last 5 years Local Plan Key Communities Who's Who Dr Conan Hassim Transport and Employment Clinical Locality Lead, Southern Locality GP at Threeways Surgery, Stoke Poges Patient Services used, CQC Mrs Helen Ellis Nurse Locality Lead, Southern Locality Community assets, Practice Nurse at Misbourne Surgery Pharmacies Locality GP Practices Dentists Burnham Health Centre Opticians Denham Medical Centre Learning Disability Centers Southmead Surgery Children Centers The Allan Practice Social Care The Hall Practice The Ivers Practice Voluntary sector services The Misbourne Practice Threeways Surgery Prisons, Universities, colleges, Private hospitals, Schools etc. Next 5 Years SWOT Analysis Locality Profile 2016 Demographics and Public Health Data1 Specific issues to consider in the Southern locality The Southern Locality’s population size in 2016 is around 84,033 people around 25% of the total Bucks population. Around 20% of the population is aged 65+ higher than the CCCG average of 18% and Bucks average of 17%. 23% of the population is aged <19 compared to 24% in CCCG and Bucks. The deprivation levels and proportion of ethnic minority population are less than the CCG and Buckinghamshire average as a whole. Life expectancy is better than the national average and similar to Bucks average but there is a difference of 3 years in life expectancy between males and females in South Bucks District Council, compared to a difference of 3.5 years in Bucks. The population of Southern locality experiences similar or worse health outcomes in some areas compared to the Buckinghamshire population.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Consultation Point
    Consultation Point: Foreword Person ID 1214453 Full Name Mr Steven Fayers ID 41 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Individual/Resident Date Received - Date Received: 2016-11-29 Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate No Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to Legally Compliant be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the No Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to Please see attached letter describing the reasons for the plan being unsound.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the PLANNING COMMITTEE HELD on THURSDAY, 5Th AUGUST 2010 at the TOWN HALL, BEACONSFIELD
    BEACONSFIELD TOWN COUNCIL Action s MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE HELD ON THURSDAY, 5th AUGUST 2010 AT THE TOWN HALL, BEACONSFIELD Present: D.A. Sanders (DS), (Chairman), S. Akther (SA), F. Armstrong (FA), K.M. Brown (KB), G. Grover (GG), A.S. Hardie (AH), R.H. Keith (RK), J.L. Simmonds (JS), A.M. Walters and H.A.V. Wilson Apologies: Cllrs. Corney, Davies, Johnson, Jones and Sacchetti Absent: Cllr. Lowen-Cooper Minutes taken by Maeve Scanlon ITEM 1. Apologies for absence These were as set out above. ITEM 2. Minutes and Observations of Last Meeting The Minutes of the Planning Meeting held on 22 nd July were received, confirmed and DS recommended for approval and signed. ITEM 3. Matters Arising There were no matters arising. ITEM 4. Plans (1) This list of applications has been recommended as applications to be considered by the Committee 10/01046/FUL 3 Burgess Wood Road South – (Mr Coyle – Michael V S Hardiman & Assoc Ltd) Replacement detached dwelling and construction of vehicular access. OBSERVATIONS No objection 10/01053/FUL 110 Gregories Road – (Mr/s Figuero – Heighway Assoc) First floor front extension and part in-fill front extension. OBSERVATIONS No objection 10/01120/FUL 110 Gregories Road – (Mr/s Figuero – Heighway Assoc) Single storey rear extension. OBSERVATIONS No objection 10/01089/REM Oakwood (Plot 1), 50 Ledborough Lane – (Mr & Mrs Warburton – Robin Bretherick Associates) Redevelopment of site (Plot 1) detached dwellinghouse with integral garage, construction of vehicular access and landscaping. OBSERVATIONS Plots 1,2 & 3 were considered together. The Committee objected as the proposed development by virtue of its height, scale, siting and design would appear unduly prominent and obtrusive in this location.
    [Show full text]
  • PUB [BUCKS.] PUBLICANS-Continued
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] 563 PUB [BUCKS.] PUBLICANS-continued. Red Lion, T. Bowen, West street, Great 1\Iarlow Old Swan, W • .Archer, Cheddington, Tring Red Lion, J. Butcher, Mill bank, Buckingham Old Swan, J. C:hapman, 'Voughton-on-the-Green, Red Lion, C. Church, Green, Wooburn, Maidenhead Bletcbley Station Red Lion, L. Clark, Lower marsh, High Wycombe Old Swan, T. Crane, Bletchley, Bletchley Station Red Lion, Mrs. E. Coleman, Stewkley, Leighton Buzzard Old Swan1 W. H. Hale, Lower marsh, Hig·h Wycombe Red Libn, H. Copcutt, Kingsbury Aylesbury Old Swan, Mrs. M • .A. Pinkard, Milton Keynes, Newport Red Lion family ~ commercial hotel ~ posting hoU8e, Pap1ell Thomas Date, High street, High Wycombe Old Thne Crowns, J. Ing, Bledlow, Tring Red Lion, M. Dudley, Grandborough, Winslow Old Wrestler, F. Costin,Northall, Eddlesborough,Dunstable Red Lion, 1\Irs. M. East, Colnbrook, Slough One Pin, H. E. Hammond, Stoke Poges, Slough Red Lion, T. Edmonds, Longwick, Princes Risborough One Star, J. Horton, Blucher street, Chesham Red Lion, E. Fletcher, Cuddington, Aylesbury Orkney Arms, W. Skindle & Son, Taplow, Maidenhead Red Lion, J. Folley, Bledlow, Tring 0Htrich, B. Hopkins, Colnbrook, Slough Red Lion, H. George, Coleshill, Amersham Oxford Arms, Mrs. E. Cole, Loudwater, High Wycombe Red Lion, J. Gill, Monks Risborough, Princes Risborough Oxford Arms, T. Harding, .1\Iarket square, Aylesbury Red Lion, A. Grace, Great Brickhill, Bletchley Station Pack Horse, Mrs. E. Cock, Gerrard's Cross, ~lough Red Lion, J. Green, Swanbourne, Winslow Pack Horse, J. Fantham, Wendover Red Lion, T. Hall, N ewnton Longville, Bletchley Station Palmer•s Arm.~, F. White, Dorney, Windsor Red Lion, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire
    NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Report No. 74/14 ASSESSMENT OF BRITISH SANDAND GRAVEL RESOURCES No. 12 The sand and gravel resources of the country around Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire Description of parts of 7 : 25 000 resource sheets SU 98, SU 99, TO 08 and TO 09 H. C. Squirrell, BSc, PhD with contributions by C. E. Corser, BSc London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1974 The Institute of Geological Sciences was formedby the incorporation of the Geological Surveyof Great Britain and the Museumof Practical Geology with Overseas Geological Surveysand is a constituentbody of the Natural Environment Research Council 0 Crown copyright1974 It is recommended that reference to this report be made in the following form: SQUIRRELL,H. C. 1974. The sand and gravel resources of the country around Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire: Description of parts of 1 : 25 000 resource sheets SU 98, SU 99, TQ 08 and TQ 09. Rep. Znst. Geol. Sci., No.74114. 169 pp. ISBN 0 1 1 8807 10 2 ii PREFACE It has become increasingly clear in recent years that an assessment of resources of many minerals should be undertaken. This is the eleventh report of the Mineral Assessment Unit with was set up in May 1968 to undertake such work. It describes the resources of sand and gravel of 143.5 km2 of country shown on the accompanying 1:25 000 resource sheet. This survey is concerned with assessing sand and gravel resources on a regional scale at the indicated level; the deposits are not outlined completely nor their grade established throughout.
    [Show full text]