DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Belt Assessment Part Two Draft Report Appendix 5: Completed Assessment Pro Forma Volume 7 – Section 4 Areas: Site Nominations 4.294 to 4.352

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chiltern District Council and South Bucks District Council Green Belt Assessment Part Two Draft Report Appendix 5: Completed Assessment Pro Forma Volume 7 – Section 4 Areas: Site Nominations 4.294 to 4.352 October 2016 Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.294 Cliveden Stud, Taplow 53.76 Part One General Area No. 73 Boundary Assessment It is not possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements. The proposed site is effectively split into two halves by Huntswood Lane. The northern half is contained on all sides by roads - Cliveden Road to the west, Taplow Common Road to the north/north east, Parliament Lane to the east/south east and Huntswood Lane to the south. However, the southern half of the proposed site lacks the clear definition of the northern half because its long eastern boundary is soft and denoted by a minor track/footpath and the tree line of Hunts Wood. There appears to be no durable defensible boundary along this western edge of the proposed site. Additionally, the proposed site does not abut an existing non-Green Belt settlement and its release would effectively punch a hole in the Green Belt. It is not considered that the proposed boundaries of the identified land would represent an appropriate new Green Belt boundary. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Not Applicable Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.295 Depot, Dropmore Road, Burnham 1.02 Part One General Area No. 71 Boundary Assessment It is not possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements. The site is entirely within the Green Belt. It is bounded to the north by Chalk Pit Lane, to the east by Dropmore Road, to the south by a private dwelling and to the west by a hedgeline and open fields. The boundaries to the west and south are therefore not considered permanent and defensible natural features and as a result it is not possible to identify a NPPF compliant boundary around the site. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Not Applicable Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.296 Land North of Poyle Farm, Burnham 0.69 Part One General Area No. 71 Boundary Assessment It is not possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements. The site is entirely within the Green Belt. It is bounded to the west by Poyle Lane, to the north by Brickfield Lane, to the south by the dwelling and residential curtilage of Poyle Farm and to the east by extensive open field. It is not possible to identify an NPPF compliant boundary as the eastern and southern boundaries are neither permanent nor defensible. The site would not represent an appropriate new boundary for the Green Belt. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Not Applicable Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.297 Ashcroft Towers, Burnham 2.70 Part One General Area No. 73 Boundary Assessment It is possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements, with a slight adjustment. The proposed site occupies the majority of an area of land which directly abuts the non-Green Belt settlement of Burnham and is well-defined on the ground by the encircling roads of Wymers Wood Road, Brickfield Lane and Poyle Lane. By expanding the boundaries to include the currently excluded dwellings of Abbey Cottage and Limewood Gate (in the north-west and south-east of the site respectively) the boundaries would be rationalised and align fully with the encircling roads. It would then be possible to identify permanent and defensible boundaries for the site. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Purpose 1a: PASS Purpose 1b: The land abuts the non-Green Belt settlement of Burnham to the south. Much of the boundary of Burnham is formed by the back gardens of dwellings so it is considered that the settlement’s boundary as a whole lacks permanence. Score: 3+/5 Purpose 2: The land is on the north side of Burnham and therefore faces away from the nearest major settlement of Slough. The land parcel is not proximate to any other nearby settlements and consequently makes no discernible contribution to settlement separation. Score: 0/5 Purpose 3: It is considered that the land parcel does not derive its rural character from a strong sense of openness and connectivity with the surrounding countryside as it appears to be subject to heavy perimeter screening from trees and hedgerows. Additionally, aerial photography suggests relatively dense tree cover on the site itself. However this screening also prevents the land deriving any strong influence from the more urban character of Burnham to the south and the fact that it consists largely of undeveloped woodland means that its character is considered to be strongly unspoilt and rural. Score: 4/5 Purpose 4: The option does not abut the historic core of Burnham. Score: 0/5 Green Belt Purpose Conclusion: The area of land scores strongly against one or more Green Belt purpose(s). Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.298 Land South of Poyle Farm, Burnham 0.75 Part One General Area No. 71 Boundary Assessment It is not possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements. The site abuts the non-Green Belt settlement of Burnham to the south/south east. The site is bounded to the west/ south west by Poyle Lane, to the north/north west by the dwelling and residential curtilage of Poyle Farm and to the north/north east by extensive open field. It is not possible to identify an NPPF compliant boundary for the site as the north/north eastern and north/north western boundaries are neither permanent nor defensible. The site’s boundary with open fields appears particularly arbitrary and is not defined by any visual feature on the ground. The site would not represent an appropriate new boundary for the Green Belt. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Not Applicable Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.299 Land off Wymers Wood Lane, 3.33 Burnham Part One General Area No. 73 Boundary Assessment It is possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements. It is possible to identify a boundary for the option if the area is expanded to meet the surrounding roads. The option would acquire durable and defensible boundaries by using the whole area contained by Wymers Wood Road to the north and east and Taplow Common Road to the south and west as a perimeter. This would rationalise the boundaries of the option sufficiently to bring forward to the next stage of testing. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Purpose 1a: PASS Purpose 1b: The land has a long interface with non-Green Belt Burnham along its eastern side. Score: 5/5 Purpose 2: The land faces away from Slough to the south and does not provide an immediate gap between major settlements. However, it is considered that the land makes an important contribution the wider openness between Burnham/Slough and Maidenhead. Additionally, the land provides a gap between the collection of dwellings at Rose Hill to the north which could have their rural character impacted by development of the option. Score: 3/5 Purpose 3: The land is under considerable influence from Burnham as it faces Burnham across Wymers Wood Road. Additionally, there are 13 existing dwellings which limit the rural character of the land. However, the western side of the option is under a stronger rural influence and contributes to an overall character which is more rural than urban. Score:3/5 Purpose 4: The land does not abut a historic settlement core. Score: 0/5 Green Belt Purpose Conclusion: The area of land scores strongly against one or more Green Belt purpose(s). Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.300 Grove Road, Burnham 4.54 Part One General Area No. 80b Boundary Assessment It is not possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements. The site is entirely within the Green Belt. There are no natural durable features around the site except for a small stretch of Grove Road in the site’s south west corner. The remaining boundary consists of property boundaries, internal access roads and treelines/hedging. It is considered that no permanent defensible boundary to the site can be identified as a result of these soft permeable boundary features. Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Green Belt Purpose Assessment Not Applicable Exceptional Circumstances Assessment Not Applicable Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL Chiltern and South Bucks Green Belt Assessment Part Two Reference No. Area Name Hectares 4.301 Land surrounding Pelham Burn, 1.67 Burnham Part One General Area No. 80b Boundary Assessment It is not possible to identify a boundary that is permanent and defensible in accordance with NPPF requirements.
Recommended publications
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire

    Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire

    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for South Bucks in Buckinghamshire Report to the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions November 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 257 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 33 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for South Bucks: Detailed Mapping 35 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for the parishes of Denham and Gerrards Cross is inserted inside the back cover of this report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
  • General Area 74 Area (Ha) 538.0 Local Authority South Bucks

    General Area 74 Area (Ha) 538.0 Local Authority South Bucks

    General Area 74 Area (ha) 538.0 Local South Bucks Authority Location Plan Description General Area 74 is located to the north and west of Iver Heath and contains land with planning permission for the expanded Pinewood Studios. It is bounded to the west by Black Park Road, Fulmer Common Road, Windmill Road and Fulmer Road, to the south by the A412, to the east by the M25 and to the north by the M40. Parts of the parcel’s eastern and south-eastern boundaries directly adjoin Iver Heath. Purpose Criteria Assessment Score (1) To check (a) Land parcel is at the The land parcel is not at the edge of an identified large built- FAIL the edge of one or more up area. unrestricted distinct large built-up sprawl of areas. large built-up (b) Prevents the outward 0 areas sprawl of a large built- up area into open land, and serves as a barrier at the edge of a large built- up area in the absence of another durable boundary. Purpose 1: Total Score 0/5 (2) To prevent Prevents development The parcel forms part of the wider gap between Gerrards 3 neighbouring that would result in Cross and Iver Heath, and Slough and Iver Heath. The towns from merging of or significant northern and south-western areas of the parcel in particular merging erosion of gap between play a role in maintaining the general scale and openness of neighbouring this gap and preventing the coalescence of the settlements, settlements, including though the south-eastern area is less important for preventing ribbon development coalescence.
  • Iver Motorway Service Area Response, February 2021

    Iver Motorway Service Area Response, February 2021

    President: Rt.Hon. the Lord Randall of Uxbridge Kt.PC. Planning Service Buckinghamshire Council King George V House King George V Road Amersham HP6 5AW February 2021 Dear Sir/Madam Re: Planning application PL/20/4332/0A Motorway Service Area between Junctions 15 and 16 near Iver Heath This application falls within the Colne Valley Regional Park (CVRP) and the Green Belt. Buckinghamshire Council and the former Chiltern and South Bucks Councils have been supporters of the CVRP since its inception. We hope the Council will continue to uphold the six objectives of the CVRP since this application represents the loss of farmland; the loss of 46 Ha of the CVRP and the Green Belt in a sensitive location; harm to recreational rights of way; harm to watercourses which run through the development, and the loss of, and harm to, existing grassland, woodland, hedgerows and their accompanying biodiversity. • This response to the planning application also looks at the case for the Motorway Service Areas affecting the CVRP, including the one in this location • The strategic planning context and the impact on the Green Belt • The extent of the harm arising from the scheme and • The scale of mitigation that should accompany the development if the very special circumstances’ (VSC) were to be accepted by the decision maker (whether the Council or Secretary of State). The case for an MSA in this location This application for a motorway service area is one of three currently being considered by local authorities along the north-western edge of the M25. All the operators state that there is a need for an MSA on this stretch of motorway between the existing Cobham and South Mimms MSAs.
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987

    The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987

    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
  • Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a Resource Assessment

    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a Resource Assessment

    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a resource assessment Inheritance Mobility Although Neolithic populations are thought to have had continued mobility, more and more evidence for Neolithic settlement has come to light. In Buckinghamshire the most important evidence comes from excavations in advance of the construction of Eton Rowing Course (ERC) and the Maidenhead to Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme (MWEFAS), mainly in the parish of Dorney in South Bucks on the Thames. The evidence points to intensive use of the area by people in the Early Neolithic but it is not certain that it represents year-round sedentary occupation rather than seasonal re-use (Allen et al 2004). Other evidence does point to continued mobility, such as the artefact scatters at Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham (Mitchell 2004) and East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990) for example, reflecting visits over a long period of time. Persistent places Mesolithic persistent places continue to have meaning for Early and later Neolithic populations. These persistent places include East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990, 18) and Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age activity at Chessvale Bowling Club nearby (Halsted 2006, 23-8). Another persistent place seems to have been the lower reaches of the River Colne. Recent excavations at the Sanderson Site, Denham (Halsey 2005) continued the activity from nearby Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge (Lewis 1991). Other persistent places include the attractive river valley location at Bancroft in Milton Keynes (Williams 1993, 5), and Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham, where the River Thame meets one of its tributaries (Mitchell 2004, 1). These persistent places may have been the basis of evolving ideas about land tenure.
  • Local Plan by Consultation Point Foreword

    Local Plan by Consultation Point Foreword

    Local Plan by Consultation Point Foreword Person ID 1224143 Full Name Land and Partners ID 5919 Order 1 Number Title Foreword Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID 1224130 Full Name Alex Dalton Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Non-Compliant Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please The Plan is not consistent with national policy as it conflicts with give details of why you the National Planning Policy Framework (ªthe NPPFº), which is national policy and advice that the consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, Councils must have regard to when preparing their Plan (Section 19(2) of the Planning and Compulsory including references to Purchase Act 2004). The Plan is not consistent with the NPPF in the following ways: relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. · It does not deliver sustainable development, which is the NPPF's core concept and is set out in Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the NPPF, particularly in terms of providing sufficient numbers of homes and sufficient land of the right type and in the right place. · It does not meet NPPF paragraphs 136-138 that alteration of Green Belt boundaries are not fully evidenced and justified (having regard to their intended permanence in the long term so they can endure beyond the Plan period) and in terms of promoting sustainable patterns of development, particularly in relation to the town of Slough and transport nodes into London and Heathrow.
  • 582 A4 TT Blue

    582 A4 TT Blue

    582 Windsor - Iver - Denham Saturdays only Village RoadCheapside Lane Windsor Slough Iver Iver Heath Denham Denham Higher DenhamNightingaleWyatts Way CovertDenham GardenDenhamStation Village Parade TfL Bus Passes, Travelcards, Saver Tickets and Oyster pay as you go are not accepted on this service. Cash fares may differ from those charged on other local bus services. Saturday Windsor Parish Church 1510 Slough Wellington Street R 1529 George Green Uxbridge Road 1533 Iver King’s Church 1542 Iver Heath Black Horse 1546 Denham Village Road 1555 Higher Denham Community Centre 1601 Nightingale Way Alex Korda House 1606 Wyatts Covert Caravan Site 1611 Denham Garden Village 1615 Denham Station Parade R 1619 No service on other days or Public Holidays Route 582 is operated on behalf of Buckinghamshire County Council Operated by Carousel Buses (01494 450151) 28.1.13(A)_T582/1 MAYOR OF LONDON *You pay no more than 5p per minute if calling from a BT Landline. There may be a connection charge. Charges from mobiles or other landline providers may vary. 582 Denham - Iver - Windsor Saturdays only Village Road Station ParadeCheapside VillageLane Road Denham Higher DenhamNightingaleWyatts Way CovertDenham GardenPenn DriveVillageDenham Denham Denham Iver HeathIver Slough Windsor TfL Bus Passes, Travelcards, Saver Tickets and Oyster pay as you go are not accepted on this service. Cash fares may differ from those charged on other local bus services. Saturday Denham Village Road 1027 Higher Denham Community Centre 1033 Nightingale Way Alex Korda House 1038 Wyatts Covert Caravan Site 1043 Denham Garden Village 1048 Denham Station Parade R 1051 Denham Village Road 1055 Iver Heath Black Horse 1106 Iver King’s Church 1110 George Green Uxbridge Road 1119 Slough Wellington Street R 1123 Windsor High Street 1141 No service on other days or Public Holidays Route 582 is operated on behalf of Buckinghamshire County Council Operated by Carousel Buses (01494 450151) 28.1.13(A)_T582/2 MAYOR OF LONDON *You pay no more than 5p per minute if calling from a BT Landline.
  • ELECTORAL REVIEW of SOUTH BUCKS Draft Recommendations For

    ELECTORAL REVIEW of SOUTH BUCKS Draft Recommendations For

    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SOUTH BUCKS Draft recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of South Bucks April 2014 BEACONSFIELD NORTH Sheet 1 of 1 B This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2014. Boundary alignments and names shown on the mapping background A may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information applied as part of this review. BEACONSFIELD CP KEY TO PARISH WARDS BEACONSFIELD WEST BEACONSFIELD SOUTH D BEACONSFIELD CP C A CENTRAL B NORTH C SOUTH EAST D WEST BURNHAM CP E BEECHES F CHURCH G LENT RISE GERRARDS CROSS IVER CP GERRARDS CROSS CP H IVER HEATH I IVER VILLAGE AND RICHINGS PARK J SHREDING GREEN K WOOD LANE HEDGERLEY CP WEXHAM CP L GEORGE GREEN AND MIDDLE GREEN M THE ORCHARDS DENHAM N WEXHAM STREET DENHAM CP FARNHAM AND HEDGERLEY FULMER CP BURNHAM CHURCH AND BEECHES E FARNHAM ROYAL CP STOKE POGES STOKE POGES CP WEXHAM AND FULMER BURNHAM CP IVER HEATH TAPLOW CP H N WEXHAM CP F K IVER CP BURNHAM LENT RISE AND TAPLOW L J G IVER VILLAGE AND RICHINGS PARK M I 0 1 2 kilometres 1cm = 0.2090km KEY DISTRICT COUNCIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY DORNEY CP PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY IVER HEATH PROPOSED WARD NAME IVER CP PARISH NAME.
  • Huntercombe Park, Taplow Welcome to Huntercombe Park / About 01 Huntercombe Park

    Huntercombe Park, Taplow Welcome to Huntercombe Park / About 01 Huntercombe Park

    Huntercombe Park, Taplow www.huntercombepark.com Welcome to Huntercombe Park / About 01 Huntercombe Park An impressive new headquarters office building, enjoying a beautifully secluded green belt location. Set in eight acres of mature parkland, but within moments of the M4 motorway and the thriving town centres of Maidenhead, Slough and Windsor. This high quality pre-let development opportunity features two wings arranged over two and three floors, with a unified architectural form arranged around a central glazed atrium. It offers a total of 91,494 square feet of office space, and has been designed to the highest sustainable standards, with a BREEAM rating of Excellent. Huntercombe Park is a rare build to suit opportunity, that promises an exciting future environment for your company. 01: 02: 03: A walk A green space A day in the park in the park in the park Huntercombe Park / Overview 02 Huntercombe Park / Overview 03 91,494 sq ft net internal 3 × thirteen person passenger lifts 298 car parking spaces (1:307 sq ft) Cycle changing / shower facilities Full height atria reception 1.5m planning grid 4 pipe fan coil units fed from air source Green roofs and landscaped terraces heat pumps Lake and jogging trail Full access raised floors (150mm system) 78 secure cycle stands Metal tile suspended ceiling BREEAM rating of Excellent CIBSE LG7 compliant lighting 01: Huntercombe Park / Location 04 Huntercombe Park / Location 05 A green location An accessible location Set within eight acres of private Despite its leafy setting, Huntercombe mature parkland, Huntercombe Park enjoys easy access to the area’s Park offers an oasis of greenery unparalleled transport links.
  • Sustainability Appraisal of the Slough Local Plan

    Sustainability Appraisal of the Slough Local Plan

    Sustainability Appraisal of the Slough Local Plan Scoping Report November 2016 Sustainability Appraisal of the Slough Local Plan Scoping Report LC-246 Document Control Box Client Slough Borough Council Report Title Sustainability Appraisal of the Slough Local Plan Status Draft Filename LC-246_Slough_SA_Scoping_Report_15_231116RB.docx Date November 2016 Author WPE, SBC Reviewed RWB, PJH Approved NJD Front cover: Detail of the roof at Slough Railway Station by Matt Buck Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v1.0 About this report & notes for readers SA is a tool for predicting potential significant effects. The actual effects Lepus Consulting Ltd (Lepus) has prepared this report for the use of may be different from those identified. Prediction of effects is made Slough Borough Council. There are a number of limitations, which using an evidence-based approach and incorporates a judgement. should be borne in mind when considering the results and conclusions of this report. No party should alter or change this report whatsoever without written permission from Lepus. This Scoping Report is based on the best available information, including that provided to Lepus by the Council and information that is © Lepus Consulting Ltd publicly available. No attempt to verify these secondary data sources has been made and they have assumed to be accurate as published. Lepus Consulting This scoping report was prepared in November 2016 and is subject to and limited by the information available during this time. 1 Bath Street, Cheltenham This report has been produced to identify the scope and level of detail Gloucestershire required in the Environmental Report for the Slough Local Plan and GL50 1YE meets the requirements of the SEA Directive.
  • Locality Profile 2016

    Locality Profile 2016

    Locality Profile 2016 Locality Profile Southern Locality Chapters Map of the locality Demographics and Public Health Data Changes over the last 5 years Local Plan Key Communities Who's Who Dr Conan Hassim Transport and Employment Clinical Locality Lead, Southern Locality GP at Threeways Surgery, Stoke Poges Patient Services used, CQC Mrs Helen Ellis Nurse Locality Lead, Southern Locality Community assets, Practice Nurse at Misbourne Surgery Pharmacies Locality GP Practices Dentists Burnham Health Centre Opticians Denham Medical Centre Learning Disability Centers Southmead Surgery Children Centers The Allan Practice Social Care The Hall Practice The Ivers Practice Voluntary sector services The Misbourne Practice Threeways Surgery Prisons, Universities, colleges, Private hospitals, Schools etc. Next 5 Years SWOT Analysis Locality Profile 2016 Demographics and Public Health Data1 Specific issues to consider in the Southern locality The Southern Locality’s population size in 2016 is around 84,033 people around 25% of the total Bucks population. Around 20% of the population is aged 65+ higher than the CCCG average of 18% and Bucks average of 17%. 23% of the population is aged <19 compared to 24% in CCCG and Bucks. The deprivation levels and proportion of ethnic minority population are less than the CCG and Buckinghamshire average as a whole. Life expectancy is better than the national average and similar to Bucks average but there is a difference of 3 years in life expectancy between males and females in South Bucks District Council, compared to a difference of 3.5 years in Bucks. The population of Southern locality experiences similar or worse health outcomes in some areas compared to the Buckinghamshire population.
  • Wexham and Ivers Local Area Forum

    Wexham and Ivers Local Area Forum

    Wexham and Ivers Local Area Forum Local Area Plan February 2016 Contents The purpose of the Area Plan .................................................................................................................. 2 Local Community Areas map .................................................................................................................. 3 Map of The Wexham and Iver Local Area .......................................................................................... 4 The Wexham and Iver Local Area Forum ........................................................................................... 5 The Wexham and Iver Local Area Forum membership ..................................................................... 6 Local Area Forum representatives .......................................................................................................... 8 Local Area Profile .................................................................................................................................... 10 The Wexham and Iver Local Area Forum priorities .......................................................................12 The purpose of the Wexham and Iver Area Plan The purpose of the Wexham and Iver Ar- act as a co-coordinating body and catalyst ea Plan is to set out a clear list of local for action, with the LAF taking a, champi- priorities that can be actively worked on oning and lobbying role. by the Local area Forum and community The Area Plan should be regarded as an members which will endeavor to make initial