Countywide Strategic Transport Model
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Countywide Strategic Transport Model Local Model Validation Report 24/10/2014 Document Control Sheet BPP 04 F8 Version 16; October 2013 Project: Countywide Strategic Transport Model Client: Buckinghamshire County Council Project No: B12798A2 Document title: Local Model Validation Report Ref. No: LMVR01 Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME ORIGINAL Tom Withey Csaba Kelen Dudley Morrell NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and Csaba Kelen that I approve them for issue DATE 24/10/2014 Document status: For Client Review REVISION NAME NAME NAME Tom Withey Csaba Kelen Dudley Morrell NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and Csaba Kelen that I approve them for issue DATE 01/12/2014 Document status: Final Document REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Document status REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Document status Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document. This document has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this document. Should the Client wish to release this document to a third party, Jacobs may, at its discretion, agree to such release provided that (a) Jacobs’ written agreement is obtained prior to such release; and (b) by release of the document to the third party, that third party does not acquire any rights, contractual or otherwise, whatsoever against Jacobs and Jacobs, accordingly, assume no duties, liabilities or obligations to that third party; and (c) Jacobs accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by the Client or for any conflict of Jacobs’ interests arising out of the Client's release of this document to the third party. LMVRv4_Client Review.docx Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Model Description 3 2.1 Zone System 3 3 Data Summary 7 3.1 Model data sources 7 3.2 Highway network 7 3.3 Public Transport network 7 3.4 Highway and Public Transport travel demand 7 3.5 Highway assignment calibration and validation 9 3.6 Public transport assignment validation 10 4 Network Model Development 11 4.1 Highway Network 11 4.2 Public Transport Network 18 5 Demand Matrix Creation 35 5.1 Introduction 35 5.2 Demand Segmentation 35 5.3 Land Uses 36 5.4 Trip Ends 38 5.5 Trip Distribution and preparation of O-D matrices 40 5.6 Highway Matrix Calibration 41 5.7 Highway Matrix Estimation of Highway Matrices 45 6 Assignment 49 6.1 Highway Assignment 49 6.2 Public Transport Assignment 49 7 Highway Assignment calibration and validation 59 7.1 Calibration and validation criteria 59 7.2 Modelled flows validation results 62 7.3 Assignment results 72 8 Public Transport Validation 78 8.1 Validation criteria 78 8.2 Assignment results 79 List of Tables Table 2-A Model zone system by geographic area 6 Table 4-A Default values used in ICA 16 Table 4-B Network checks made without an assignment 17 Table 4-C Bus stop clustering examples 19 Table 4-D London Underground Headway Assumptions 26 Table 4-E London Underground Services 27 LMVRv4_Client Review.docx Table 4-F Zone Connector Typology 28 Table 4-G Distance Based Rail Fares 32 Table 4-H Distance Based London Underground Fares 33 Table 4-I Distance based bus fares 34 Table 5-A Purpose, user class and vehicle class relationships 36 Table 5-B Daily Trip Productions by purpose, mode and area, and Daily Trip Attractions by area 39 Table 5-C Peak hour factors for Buckinghamshire town centres 41 Table 5-D Average trip lengths (km) by purpose, mode and area type 42 Table 5-E Prior and post matrix estimation matrix totals 45 Table 5-F Benchmark Criteria for Matrix Estimation Changes 46 2 Table 5-G Slope and R summary of AM, IP and PM trip ends 46 Table 5-H Trip length distribution criteria for prior / post matrix estimation 47 Table 6-A Summary of Recommendations for PT Assignment Model Applicability 50 Table 6-B Impedance Parameters 51 Table 7-A Link flow criteria 59 Table 7-B AM, IP and PM Peak link flow validation Prior Matrix Estimation 60 Table 7-C AM, IP and PM Peak link flow validation Post Matrix Estimation 60 Table 7-D Screenline Flow criteria 60 Table 7-E Screenline Flow Difference 61 Table 7-F AM, IP and PM Peak Journey Time validation - Post Matrix Estimation 61 Table 7-G Difference between modelled and observed Car flows - AM Peak hour 63 Table 7-H Difference between modelled and observed HGV flows - AM Peak hour 64 Table 7-I Difference between modelled and observed LGV flows - AM Peak hour 65 Table 7-J Difference between modelled and observed Car flows - IP Peak hour 66 Table 7-K Difference between modelled and observed HGV flows - IP Peak hour 67 Table 7-L Difference between modelled and observed LGV flows - IP Peak hour 68 Table 7-M Difference between modelled and observed Car flows - PM Peak hour 69 Table 7-N Difference between modelled and observed HGV flows - PM Peak hour 70 Table 7-O Difference between modelled and observed LGV flows - PM Peak hour 71 Table 7-P Highway assignment in the AM peak hour in Year 2013 (veh/hour/direction) 72 Table 7-Q Highway assignment in the IP hour in Year 2013 (veh/hour/direction) 73 Table 7-R Highway assignment in the PM peak hour in Year 2013 (veh/hour/direction) 74 Table 7-S Level of congestion in the AM peak hour in Year 2013 (volume over capacity in %) 75 Table 7-T Level of congestion in the IP hour in Year 2013 (volume over capacity in %) 76 Table 7-U Level of congestion in the PM peak hour in Year 2013 (volume over capacity in %) 77 Table 8-A Modelled and Observed Station boarding and Alighting Comparison 79 LMVRv4_Client Review.docx List of Figures Figure 2-A Basis for the modelled zoning system 3 Figure 2-B Model zone system inside Buckinghamshire County 4 Figure 2-C Model zone system within the “Halo” area 5 Figure 2-D Model zones system of the external area 6 Figure 4-A Volume-Delay functions used in the Countywide model 13 Figure 4-B Excerpt showing observed areas of congestion 14 Figure 4-C Roundabout coding 15 Figure 4-D Line routes and time profile aggregation settings 20 Figure 4-E Bus services 21 Figure 4-F Rail network 23 Figure 4-G Buckinghamshire Rail Stations and Lines 24 Figure 4-H London Underground Services 25 Figure 4-I Metropolitan Line 26 Figure 4-J Aylesbury Rail Stations and Connectors 29 Figure 4-K Bus Connectivity 30 Figure 4-L London Underground Interchange Stations 31 Figure 6-A General Public Transport Assignment Settings 52 Figure 6-B Public Transport Assignment Setting - Basis 53 Figure 6-C Public Transport Assignment Setting - Search 54 Figure 6-D Public Transport Assignment setting - Preselection 55 Figure 6-E Public Transport Assignment Settings - Impedance 56 Figure 6-F Origin Wait Time Settings 57 Figure 6-G Choice Procedure Settings 57 Figure 8-A AM Peak Flows 80 Figure 8-B Public Transport assignment in the Inter Peak Hour (passenger/hr/direction) 81 Figure 8-C PM Peak Flows 82 Appendices Appendix A Zonal system of major towns in Buckinghamshire Appendix B Link types and parameters Appendix C Bus services Appendix D Rail services Appendix E Interchange Stations in Central London Appendix F Highway Traffic Flow Calibration Appendix G Journey Time Validation Appendix H Journey Time Routes Appendix I Scatter Plots of Matrix Trip Ends Appendix J Trip Length Distribution Appendix K Planning Data (2011-2013) LMVRv4_Client Review.docx 1 Introduction Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) is refreshing its countywide investment programme for major capital projects to support delivery of the Economic Strategy for Buckinghamshire.